User talk:Dlthewave: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:41, 11 May 2018 editDlthewave (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,588 edits →Please comment on Talk:Jeff Novitzky: cleanupTag: Visual edit ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 20:30, 19 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,974 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Dlthewave/Archive 3) (bot
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{hat\|Discretionary Sanctions Awareness:}}
	''To submit a Personal Attack or Baseless Accusation, please ].''
			{{Ds/aware\|9/11\|a-a\|a-i\|ab\|acu\|aerc\|ap\|at\|mos\|b\|blp\|cam\|cc\|cid\|e-e\|ecig\|fg\|gc\|gg\|gmo\|ipa\|lr\|lw\|muh-im\|old\|pr\|ps\|r-i\|saq\|sen\|sci\|tm\|tpm\|tt\|we}}
		⚫	–] ] 20:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
			{{hab}}

	{{Archive box \|auto=yes \|search=no \|title=]\|collapsible=no}}		{{Archive box \|auto=yes \|search=no \|title=]\|collapsible=no}}

	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\| algo=old(60d)
⚫	\|counter = 1
		⚫	\| archive=User talk:Dlthewave/Archive %(counter)d
⚫	\|archiveheader = {{Aan}}
		⚫	\| counter=3
	\|maxarchivesize = ~~999K~~		\| maxarchivesize=300K
⚫	\|archive = User talk:Dlthewave/Archive %(counter)d
		⚫	\| archiveheader={{Aan}}
	\|headerlevel = 2
			\| minthreadsleft=6
			\| minthreadstoarchive=1
	}}		}}

			==Confederate monuments==
	== AR-15 talk ==
			I was hoping you'd comment on a matter at the ] talk page.--MagicatthemovieS

			== Lookout, Wyoming ==
	I had a feeling you'd be the one to respond to that, and thanks by the way, but as a suggestion, wouldn't ] be more suitable than ]? Just a thought... - <span style="text-shadow:#E05FFF 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">'']''</span> 03:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

			Hello Dlthewave, i answered you on the page's '']''. I'm at your disposal to clarify issues related to the matter.<br>
	== Off topic? ==
			Your sincerely, <br>
			], '']''. 21 May 2020, 02:37

			== Contentious topics ==
	Do you have the right editor? I asked that editor to not derail that thread with off-topic comments (which they were). I invited him to continue discussing his edits if he were willing, (but not in that thead), and of everything on that page, that is the one post you characterize as a "rant"? (kind of insulting). Why is it you are following my edits and posting these admin-like warnings and even hatting some in a 'clerking-type fashion? Can you explain this ongoing behavior of yours? Thank you - <span style="text-shadow:#E05FFF 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">'']''</span> 04:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

			== Introduction to contentious topics ==
	== Please comment on ] ==
			{{ivmbox \| image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg \|imagesize=50px \| bg = #E5F8FF \| text = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

			A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 86668 --> ] (]) 04:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

			Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
	== This looks like campaigning ==
			*adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
			*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
			*follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
			*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
			*refrain from gaming the system.

			<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl\|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->
	Dlthewave, I would be careful about edits like this ]. That discussion isn't a RfC and the members of the gun politics project are almost all sympathetic with inclusion of such material and at a rate far more so vs the participants we've seen at similar RfCs. Also, you didn't notify the more obvious Project Firearms. The article in question is clearly about a gun, not politics related to guns. I would ask that you either remove the notice or make it a RfC and go through the normal notification process.
			== ''The Signpost'': 12 December 2024 ==

			<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-12-12}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 17, manually published--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 21:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC) </div></div>
	I know you are doing this in good faith but this was one of my concerns with the gun politics project. My concern grew when I saw that the project tags weren't just added to obvious articles about gun politics (gun laws, stand your ground etc) but was extended to many articles about guns themselves. Edit: I just noticed that the M1911 article is of interest to three projects which weren't notified but not listed as "of interest" to the Gun Politic's project. ] (]) 15:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Bri@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1262352523 -->
	::Thanks for the reminder, I will add the project tag.
	::It is up to project participants to decide which topics are within scope, and we've determined that criminal use is within the realm of gun politics. I find it useful and appropriate to include a list of open discussions on the project page. –] ] 16:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
	:::I would suggest you notify all the projects or none. Like I said, when we look at the list of Gun Politic's participants I think the prevailing POV is clear. Yes, people have made a similar claim about Project Firearms but it does have a much larger list of editors. Please be sure to notify the other projects if you wish to keep the notification at Project Gun Politics. It should eliminate the appearance of favoritism or campaigning. ] (]) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
	:::I would also ask that you do the same with this notification. ]. ] (]) 16:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
	::::I'm going to keep it as is for now, but I'm open to discussing it if uninvolved editors will weigh in. –] ] 17:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
	:::::I would suggest asking... I'm not sure where. The AR-15 discussion isn't important enough to bother with but the M1911 discussion hits on a core issue that has been the subject of a number of RfCs etc. Notifying a single project that you created and is followed almost exclusively by editors who historically share your POV on articles looks really bad to me. I know you aren't doing this in bad faith but the results may be the same. ] (]) 17:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
⚫	~~::::::I'll leave it to you to raise your concerns at the appropriate forum.~~ –] ] 18:19, 4 ~~May~~ ~~2018~~ (UTC)

			== ''The Signpost'': 24 December 2024 ==
	== Please comment on ] ==

			<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-12-24}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 18--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 00:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div>
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 87101 --> ] (]) 04:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1263792399 -->

			== ''The Signpost'': 15 January 2025 ==
	== Talk page ==
	As I have already ask you nicely, please keep all comment to article talk pages. You can be sanction for violating this request. I will let this one slide, but if you violate this again I will bring it to the attention of the admins on a noticeboard. Thank you. -] (]) 14:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

			<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15}} </div><!--Volume 21, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 07:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div>
	:I have not read whatever you placed on my talk page. I am now going to take this to a noticeboard for sanction against you. You clearly do not understand Wiki policy of user talk pages. You have been clearly warned many times to not post on my personal talk page and keep comments to article talk pages ,. -] (]) 16:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1269316164 -->

	I've taken this issue to ANi so here is the notification. ] (]) 18:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:30, 19 January 2025

Discretionary Sanctions Awareness:

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:

Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts
the Arab–Israeli conflict
abortion
complementary and alternative medicine
post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people
the English Misplaced Pages article titles policy and Manual of Style
the English Misplaced Pages Manual of Style and article titles policy
the Balkans or Eastern Europe
articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
complementary and alternative medicine
climate change
discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes
the Balkans or Eastern Europe
Falun Gong
governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed
India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
pseudoscience and fringe science
the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour
post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people
the Troubles

They should not be given alerts for those areas.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present.

Confederate monuments

I was hoping you'd comment on a matter at the Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials talk page.--MagicatthemovieS

Lookout, Wyoming

Hello Dlthewave, i answered you on the page's talk section. I'm at your disposal to clarify issues related to the matter.
Your sincerely,
Faqu, talk. 21 May 2020, 02:37

Contentious topics

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.