| Revision as of 08:21, 25 May 2018 editThe Transhumanist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers302,803 edits Thank you← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:37, 8 February 2022 edit undoNigej (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers115,636 edits add notification | ||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | ||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| You've been changing this to change the original co-designers to a single designer, with the aid of this ref: {{Cite web | |||
| <blockquote>None of the sources cited come close to being [[WP:RS</blockquote> | |||
| |url=http://toolsandtoys.net/reviews/a-review-of-the-remastered-herman-miller-aeron-office-chair/ | |||
| |title=Tools and Toys | |||
| |quote=Back in 1994, Bill Stumpf and Don Chadwick envisioned a new type of office chair that featured engineering over design. | |||
| }} | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Do you see the problem? There's plenty to support Chadwick doing the redesign later, and alone (Stumpf having died), but nothing supports Stumpf being the solo designer for the original. ] (]) 23:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Thank you very much == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 07:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC). | |||
| The ] was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about ]. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I'd also like to let you know that the ] is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 12:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC). | |||
| Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the ], or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them. | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
| If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the ] receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted ], for your convenience. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 15:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, <span class="nowrap"> — '']'' </span> 08:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{tl|ping}} me. Thank you. ''-TT'' | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 19:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 8 February 2022
Proposed deletion of Olde Boston Bulldogge
The article Olde Boston Bulldogge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
None of the sources cited come close to being [[WP:RS
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavalryman (talk) 07:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC).
Nomination of SC-76 Thunderbolt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SC-76 Thunderbolt is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/SC-76 Thunderbolt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cavalryman (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC).
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Extinct dog breeds of Brazil
A tag has been placed on Category:Extinct dog breeds of Brazil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 15:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Extinct dog breeds of Ireland
A tag has been placed on Category:Extinct dog breeds of Ireland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Cryptid simians
Template:Cryptid simians has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)