Misplaced Pages

Talk:Korean Air: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:44, 2 June 2018 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,269 editsm Fix CB3 template.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:24, 3 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,975 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Korean Air/Archive 2) (bot 
(32 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Aviation|class=B|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Airlines-project=yes}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Aviation|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Airlines-project=yes}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Korea|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Korea|importance=High}}
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Korean Air/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
| algo = old(365d)
| archive = Talk:Korean Air/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 2
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}

== Split ==

Many, many other airlines on Misplaced Pages, including much smaller airlines, feature their own fleet page. Why not Korean? ] (]) 15:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
:Make your case, people will chip in with their opinion. Just for the record, ] is not a sufficient argument. See ] for some reasons why a split might be appropriate, as well as the way to start a discussion that people might notice. ] (]) 20:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
::Seconding ], and I'd also point out my comment at ] <nowiki>:</nowiki>3 ] (]]) 02:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
:Any updates on this? Discussion seems to have virtually stopped and there doesn't seem to be strong momentum to split. I may close soon if nothing ] (]) 02:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
::Necessity of splitting has not gone away, i might take a stab at it again ] (]) 04:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
:::Keep in mind based on the Asiana thread it seemed like there was consensus objection to splitting; you're welcome to open second discussion but I predict it'll end similarly ] (]) 07:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
:::Simply objecting that "there needs to be a split" does not provide an adequate reason to split. ~ ] (] • ]) 21:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
:: Refer to the WP:Guideline (]) only article with over 50 kB or 8000 words may be considered for ]. As of now, current article prose size is only 15 kB (2512 words). So, no need to even to consider split article. ] (]) 09:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

== Fleet ==

I found only two sources across the internet that Korean Air is going to retire their 747-8is by 2031. But the rest of the internet says that there is no such evidence that Korean Air will retire their 747-8is by 2031. From my opinion, it does not provide enough evidence that Korean Air is going to retire 747-8i fleet by 2031. ] (]) 10:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


:Found the same problem. ] (]) 20:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
== External links modified (January 2018) ==


== Fleet ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


Greetings from fellow Wikipedian BuddyHeigh!
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
Found lots of problems regarding the fleet information about Korean Air fleet. The fleet information shows that KAL's going to phase out the Airbus A380s by 2026 and and the Boeing 747-8is by 2031. This information is only found in the internet other Misplaced Pages is SimpleFlying, who shares the same information. But SimpleFlying still needs some fixing as it sometimes gives wrong information. The fleet information needs proper source to claim that the fleet information is correct. One website is not enough to provide enough source for the fleet information. If any other Wikipedian finds my topic useful, please make sure to keep watch that no one shares such wrong information.
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929071031/http://www.kal-asd.com/ to http://www.kal-asd.com/
Thanks Wikipedians,
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929071031/http://www.kal-asd.com/ to http://www.kal-asd.com/
BuddyHeigh ] (]) 20:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


: Hello ], we would need to find a ] for those numbers. However, SimpleFlying is not reliable. They have been found to copy the content from other websites including Misplaced Pages without an checks. --] (]) 19:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
::Thank you Wikipedian McSly for agreeing with me.
::BuddyHeigh ] (]) 15:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


== Korean Air A350 images? ==
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}


Can someone add in the Korean Air A350-900 images to the Wiki? At least one of the two delivered aircraft has been spotted, see: . ] (]) 17:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:24, 3 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Korean Air article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAviation: Airlines
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airline project.
WikiProject iconCompanies High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconKorea High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split

Many, many other airlines on Misplaced Pages, including much smaller airlines, feature their own fleet page. Why not Korean? SurferSquall (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Make your case, people will chip in with their opinion. Just for the record, other stuff exists is not a sufficient argument. See WP:SPLIT for some reasons why a split might be appropriate, as well as the way to start a discussion that people might notice. Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Seconding Lithopsian, and I'd also point out my comment at Talk:Asiana_Airlines#Split :3 F4U (they/it) 02:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Any updates on this? Discussion seems to have virtually stopped and there doesn't seem to be strong momentum to split. I may close soon if nothing toobigtokale (talk) 02:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Necessity of splitting has not gone away, i might take a stab at it again SurferSquall (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep in mind based on the Asiana thread it seemed like there was consensus objection to splitting; you're welcome to open second discussion but I predict it'll end similarly toobigtokale (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Simply objecting that "there needs to be a split" does not provide an adequate reason to split. ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 21:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Refer to the WP:Guideline (WP:SIZERULE) only article with over 50 kB or 8000 words may be considered for split. As of now, current article prose size is only 15 kB (2512 words). So, no need to even to consider split article. Ckfasdf (talk) 09:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Fleet

I found only two sources across the internet that Korean Air is going to retire their 747-8is by 2031. But the rest of the internet says that there is no such evidence that Korean Air will retire their 747-8is by 2031. From my opinion, it does not provide enough evidence that Korean Air is going to retire 747-8i fleet by 2031. Good Highlights (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Found the same problem. BuddyHeigh (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Fleet

Greetings from fellow Wikipedian BuddyHeigh! Found lots of problems regarding the fleet information about Korean Air fleet. The fleet information shows that KAL's going to phase out the Airbus A380s by 2026 and and the Boeing 747-8is by 2031. This information is only found in the internet other Misplaced Pages is SimpleFlying, who shares the same information. But SimpleFlying still needs some fixing as it sometimes gives wrong information. The fleet information needs proper source to claim that the fleet information is correct. One website is not enough to provide enough source for the fleet information. If any other Wikipedian finds my topic useful, please make sure to keep watch that no one shares such wrong information. Thanks Wikipedians, BuddyHeigh BuddyHeigh (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello BuddyHeigh, we would need to find a reliable source for those numbers. However, SimpleFlying is not reliable. They have been found to copy the content from other websites including Misplaced Pages without an checks. --McSly (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Wikipedian McSly for agreeing with me.
BuddyHeigh BuddyHeigh (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Korean Air A350 images?

Can someone add in the Korean Air A350-900 images to the Wiki? At least one of the two delivered aircraft has been spotted, see: . GalacticOrbits (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: