User talk:Cla68: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:56, 2 November 2006 editMantanmoreland (talk \| contribs)5,801 edits →Your comment ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 18:32, 28 December 2024 edit undoGog the Mild (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers97,023 edits Fixing style/layout errors
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXX, March 2016 ==
	== Response to your comment ==
	]

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	== Links ==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
	No problem friend. Don't feel some guilt or something like that. I've just done some maintenance. Btw, I am watching your professional edits for some time and must say you look like an expert for World War II. Do you study a history or something similar ? - ] 19:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
			{\|
	:I feel the same satisfaction creating and editing all these articles. Surely it will help many people. I believe Misplaced Pages will become really a huge encyclopedia in a few years. It just started in 2001, I am here since 2004 and must say it's every year twice larger. Anyway, if you will need some help or assistance in future (I am an admin), just let me know. :) - ] 07:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=709407236 -->

	==~~Shut~~ ~~out~~==		== Indeffed ==

			If Cla68 is indeffed blocked, why does it not say that on his user page ? Just wondering, like <span style="border:1px solid #333333;padding:1px;">]</span> 10:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
	Hi, I saw your comment at ] and was wondering if you'd like to participate in WikiProject on shoring up one of Misplaced Pages's great weaknesses (how ideas can be "ganged-up" on and effectively shut-out), as .
			:] are not required. Don't post on this page again, as the user can't respond here — take concerns somewhere else. ] \| ] 10:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC).

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXI, April 2016 ==
	If I can drum up enough interest, I'll start a project like ], but hopefully it will attract more participants, last longer, and have greater effect. --] 14:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	==Ooops==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=712255772 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXII, May–June 2016 ==
	Forgot to say thanks for all your help on sources, etc - which was why I awarded the barnstar in the first place! ] 18:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	== Masutatsu Oyama ==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
	A user seems bent on reverting to a version repeating unnecessarily that he is Korean. I don't see why his nationality needs be in the first line at all. I've reverted to an intro I made which I think is a lot nicer; but this person seems to show up each night and revert it. Since you also seemed interested in making a neutral article, I thought you might be able to share your input, or help improve it even better. The other party's version also (unfortunately) doesn't seem to flow as well (in my opinion)... I have a feeling this individual is alone in his opinion, and is going against the consensus. If you could watch this page I'd appreciate it. —<font face="Verdana" color="#003399">''']'''</font><sup><small><font color="#009933">]</font></small></sup> 05:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=719831229 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXIII, July 2016 ==
	:Then you must also want to change the ] introduction into the following more "neutral" version.

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	"'''Gichin Funakoshi''' (船越義珍 Funakoshi Gichin, ]–]) was a ] master who formally introduced karate to the ]ese mainland in ]. He was born in ], but spent most of his life living in ]."
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=724161130 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXIV, August 2016 ==
	] 05:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	::LactoseTI, response is on your talk page. By the way ``71.124.36.224``, if I may use your name in such a casual fashion, please sign-in and use your user account name when you leave such insightful, non-petulant, and non-passive-aggressive comments on editor's discussion pages. ] 11:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=733341516 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXV, September 2016 ==
	== Linda Ham ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	Glad to hear that you felt my (very minor) edits were useful. I'm afraid, though, that I don't have any inside information about Linda Ham. Although I'm keenly interested in NASA and particularly in Mission Control, I don't have any sources of information apart from the usual, which you seem to have covered very well already. You might well be able to find the answer to those sort of questions by simply contacting NASA's Public Affairs Office, though.
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=737214409 -->

			== Military history WikiProject coordinator election ==
	The article is shaping up very well. I might pitch in a little more here and there if it wouldn't be stepping on your toes. ] 14:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

			Greetings from the ]! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the ]. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, ] (]) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
	::Was just wondering whether you happen to have saved a copy of the biographical article by Michael Cabbage. Alas, it seems to have disappeared into the paid section of the site, and I could do with taking a look at it. ] 16:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:TomStar81@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=739120148 -->

			== A barnstar for you! ==
	:::Thanks for the offer. I've managed to find the article (and a few more where that came from) via my university library. I could e-mail them to you as PDFs if that would be useful. ] 13:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	== Article for peer review ==
			\|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
			\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" \| '''The Original Barnstar'''
			\|-
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| Thank you for the great military stories. ] (]) 15:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
			\|}

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXVI, October 2016 ==
	Hi, I have nominated the article ] for ] and Kirill has suggested that I ask you to have a look at the article. If you've got the time I'd really appreciate any feedback. Thanks, --] 00:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
	: Thanks a lot for your comments. --] 10:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	==Talk page comment==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
	Hello. Thanks for you comment on my talk page, but as you can see from LactoseTI's comment, after reviewing the contributions from IP in question, he admits he "jumped the gun a bit", which is fair enough. While I do understand the fustration of vandal fighting it is important to ensure that good faith editors (whether logged in or not) are not caught up in the crossfire simply because they edit from similar geographic areas. However, my main point at the time was to correct the misunderstanding that uncited material must be tagged and should not be removed, as that was the basis of his warnings to the IP in question. While some editors choose to tag uncited claims, they are not required to do so, and in the case of uncited critism about living people, it '''must''' be removed. That is why I removed the section you tagged in ], as tagging was not the correct option in this case. ] is ''very'' clear on this matter - if it's critism about a living person and uncited, remove it. When it comes to non-living people, the rule isn't as absolute, but straight removal of uncited material is still perfectly acceptable hence why I pointed out that the warning someone for taking such actions (which are justified by one of the core policies) wasn't the correct thing to do. I tend towards the stricter side of requiring immediate references, only adding {{tl\|fact}} tags to minor details, but as I pointed out to LactoseTI, even for those taking a less strict view, tagging must only be a temporary measure, because in the end, it must boil down to one thing - "cite or remove". Regards, ] 12:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 14:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=742918512 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXVII, November 2016 ==
	== Battle of Savo Island ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	] Congratulations on your sixth (''sixth!'') featured article! Here's some champagne to celebrate the occasion! ;-) ] 02:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Interview: '']''
			* Review essay: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=747941144 -->

			== ]: Voting now open! ==
	== Japanese links ==
	Hi, Cla68. Do you need to add the links to the Japanese articles, when the interwiki links are already there: "]", etc. And why as ''external'' links? ] 07:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

			{{Ivmbox\|Hello, Cla68. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
	==Help re WWII Aleutian Islands (Alaska) Campaign==
	Hi, Cla88. I need some help with the detail regarding ]'s role in WWII, and Kirill suggested that you might be able to help. I've found , but these contradict each other slightly, giving different names for the people involved. Can you help with this? Thanks, ] 14:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	:Thanks very much for your comments. I've now revised the coverage of the section on WWII, and I'm now much happier with it. The main problem I had was that the sources were giving different names for the makers of certain decisions, but I've decided to omit names. I like to keep some human interest, but ultimately the article is about an island.
	:If the mood takes me, I might do a little work on the main Aleutian Islands Campaign article, as it could certainly use some work. However, I seem to have unintentionally adopted nuclear test sites as a personal project, and there are many more to do once I've finished this one... Cheers, ] 11:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	==Where did you find the guadalcanal maps?==

			If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
	I'm looking for a map that zooms in on Kolombongara island, where did you find the solomon islands map so that I can find the others? --] 18:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
			\|Scale of justice 2.svg\|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/11&oldid=750554570 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXVIII, December 2016 ==
	I also agree on the ganging up thing, I had to fight 13 people at once. --] 19:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	==Response to your Japanese War Crime comments==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
	Hey, what was wrong with the testimony edit of the nurse who stated she helped cover up bodies in West Tokyo. It had references and quotes by the people who investigated that issue. The nurses name is Toyo Iishi. If we don't give specifics in that article section people tend to delete it. Then later as time goes on references will get lost or forgotten, then people tend to state that the information is not true. I will try to re-edit it without the qoutes by the investigator which could be seen as POV, I believe they stated "legacy of Japans rampage" or something. But I think the name of the individual who testified needs to be included, otherwise the article which is sensitive to begin with is always being changed with people asking for proof. It reminds me of the holocaust section where some people keep saying it never happened. Anyways I'll add the name of the nurse, but I won't put in the quotes. Please check it out and see if you have problems with it and let me know, thanks. --] 10:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Review essay: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=753276223 -->

			== Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon! ==
	== Your report on ] ==

			{\| style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; background: transparent;"
	Hello. I saw your report on ]. Kindly keep in mind that you need to warn users before you report them on this page. Regards, — ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 12:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
			\|- valign="top" style="text-align: center;"
			\| ] ]<br/>]
			\|}
			Time is running out to voting for the ] and ]! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, ] (]) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

			<small>This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all ] of the Military History WikiProject.</small>
	Nice work. I like quality new contributors to wikipedia (like myself) ] 14:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:TomStar81@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=755902062 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXIX, January 2017 ==
	== Japan dislikes and likes ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	I guess for me the museum was frustrating because I was with a bunch of people who kept saying how horrible it was, and one stupid girl who said to the Japanese with us "I want to apologize for what my country did to you" followed by solemn nods from other foreigners in our group. But there is no mention of what preceded the bombing, other than the "cold, calculated" process America took to decide what city to bomb. It most definately is designed to elicit sympathy from the rest of the world. Even my own girlfriend said while we were there "I hate Americans." So much for fostering "peace." I have never introduced the atomic bombings into conversations when talking with a Japanese person; they always do.--] 01:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=758131077 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXX, February 2017 ==
	==Campaignbox Pacific 1941==
	I think ] should be kept for three reasons. Firstly, if we are following Allied commands in our definition of campaigns/theatres, it corresponds somewhat with the short-lived ], which preceded the three Allied supreme commands formed in mid-1942 --- the ], ] and the ]. Second, I also think that if we combine the Pacific 1941 items in the other two (or three) they will become too big and unwieldly. Third, "Pacific 1941" covers the period of the Japanese offensives up to and including Midway, after which the tide of war turned. Thanks, ] \| ] 07:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	==it was a violation of ]==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
	your edit in my page is non factual and is in fact bad faith in itself, i consider it a vandalism to my page. I was concerned with the libel in it after revewing WP:BLP concerning some other case (being on the other side). No, i'm not the same as mantanmoreland... that's ridicilous and bad faith too since it's obvious we're not, though I've become interested in some of his interests and vice-versa, that's true. ] 23:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=762460818 -->

			== March Madness 2017 ==
	==Weiss bio==

			G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its ]. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
	As to sources, the material about Weiss' education and early jobs probably comes from Weiss' blog. http://www.gary-weiss.com/bio.htm

			* tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
	Blogs are not always reliable as sources, of course, but it isn't clear to me why anybody would suspect Weiss of lying in the particular respects at issue here (do you really pad your resume by pretending to have working at a newspaper in Hartford, Conn.?). --] 01:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
			* updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
			* creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

			As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
	(removing edit by confirmed sockpuppet of ])

			The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found ] for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
	== Your edit to my user page ==
	Re You reinstated a bad faith vandalism warning from the anon user in question. I and an administrator had removed personal attacks. The page of the anon user in question was semiprotected to prevent reversion of the personal attacks. Please desist from edits of that character. Thanks. --] 07:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

			The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

			For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, ] (]) & ] (]) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
	== Your POV-pushing and personal attacks==
			<!-- Message sent by User:TomStar81@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=766729927 -->
	Re , use of the term "self promotional" is on the cusp between aggressive POV-pushing and vandalism. Please stop.

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXI, March 2017 ==
	Also, re your various comments on the ] talk page and elsewhere (such as use of the phrase "bad faith " in ), please refrain from personal attacks and ad hominem comments, and please address your comments to the article and not the editor. --] 11:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
	:Those aren't personal attacks, those are accurate descriptions of what's going-on with that article. Personal attacks are much different in nature. Evidence strongly suggests that the article is being used for self-promotion. That's a big no-no. Believe me, it's not personal. Also, unlike you, I won't be deleting your comments from my user page immediately because I don't have anything to hide. ] 13:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	Greetings, Cla68. I saw your afd for the ]. My concern is that it links to a non-Misplaced Pages site for its evidence. Technically, we're not supposed to accept off-Misplaced Pages evidence. What's worse, that particular site tries to "out" some Misplaced Pages members, posting alleged personal information and libel against them. By an earlier arbcom ruling, links to "attack sites" can be deleted by anyone, and although the ''page'' you link to isn't really problematic, the ''site'' arguably is.
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=767169713 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXII, April 2017 ==
	For both those reasons, I'm going to remove your link. It's nothing personal, and I don't have a stake at all in whether the ] article should be kept or not. Feel free to summarize the info from that site into the afd page. All the best, – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 17:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	== Gary Weiss ==
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=774057982 -->
			== ] scheduled for TFA ==

			This is to let you know that the ] article has been scheduled as ] for May 4, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at ], but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! ] - ] 15:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
	:After the AfD process has run its course, and if the article is voted for '''keeping''', I'll attempt again to edit the Weiss article to remove the self-promotion and make it a neutral article that contains all cited, relevant information about the subject. If I'm blocked again in doing so, then the next step will be as you suggest. ] 14:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

			Thank you for the article! --] (]) 04:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
	I'm curious whether I'm one of the alleged "three socks" to whom you refer in the Afd. For what it's worth to you, I'm nobody's sock. If you're determined to believe I am, I suppose you can. I'm just curious about the reference. --] 14:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXIII, May 2017 ==
	:I really don't care if an editor is a sock puppet or not as long as they don't use Misplaced Pages for self-promotion or to promote someone else in violation of the Conflict of Interest guidelines and follow all of the other policies of Misplaced Pages. I sincerely believe that the Gary Weiss article is being used to inappropriately to promote the subject. If the usual editors of that article continue to block others from editing it or changing it within Misplaced Pages's guidelines, then they need to stop it. If one or more people are using several different accounts as sock puppets to block attempts to remove the POV/promotion from the article, then it's valid to state during the conflict resolution process that evidence exists that sock puppetry is occurring. Evidence is usually circumstantial, but in cumulative form can be a strong case for detecting sock puppetry. If the issues with the article are forced to be presented to arbitrators, then any evidence can be presented there. ] 03:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	::You said this: "the three editors who consistently edit and monitor the article are sock puppets...." I'm wondering: was the statement, which after all you reaffirm every moment that you don't edit it differently, intended to refer to me? That's the question. If you have three wiki names in mind of which "Christofurio" isn't one, then the right answer is "no." If you have two other names in mind plus my own when you say that, then the right answer is "yes." In neither case is "I really don't care" a responsive answer, since you cared enough to make the reference, and that's the caring that counts here. I don't care what you believe, but if you're willing to use a phrase like "three ... socks" you should be willing either to retract it or to name the three names. I am of course perfectly willing to have you bring the issue before the arbs. --] 04:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=778254206 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXIV, June 2017 ==
	:::I sincerely hope we don't have to go to arbitration, because there's an easier resolution. That's to allow other editors to edit the article within Misplaced Pages guidelines, whether the "regular" editors of that article necessarily agree with those edits or not. If that can happen then there's no problem, whether you're a "sock" or not. You seem more concerned over whether you're accused as one of the "socks" than about the problems with the article. I myself am accused of being the sockpuppet of a banned user in the AfD discussion about the Gary Weiss article. However, the accusation doesn't worry me because I'm not trying to do anything underhanded, I'm trying to help correct a problem article. I guess I could ask that particular editor for his/her evidence of why I'm supposedly a sockpuppet? Instead, I'd rather spend my time working to contribute to Misplaced Pages's body of knowledge and helping correct any abuses I find. ] 06:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	:::For the record, I'm not accusing Christofurio of being a sock puppet. ] 04:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=784389869 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXV, July 2017 ==
	::::There are no "regular editors" of ]. There is <i>one</i> regular vandal, and it is WordBomb. Your behavior has closely approximated his in this manner: your edit here , your rush to a ] AfD after approximately four contributions to the article, and your citation of an off-Wiki attack site. Yes, I believe that you are a sockpuppet of WordBomb. But if you are not, you are doing an excellent imitation of one. If you don't want to be mistaken for a sockpuppet of WordBomb, don't behave like him. Incidentally, one of his fave techniques - this from one of the most notorious sockpuppets in Wiki history - is to accuse others of sockpuppetry. Again, you came charging into that article doing just that. I have, by the way, deleted the comment at the start of this section from the latest WordBomb sockpuppet. --] 09:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	::::Cla68. I've now twice tried to get you to give me a straight answer to a simple question. I won't try any more. You have plainly decided you don't wish to do so. You only wish to lecture me about what I should be "concerned" about. Well, frankly, I'm not at all "concerned" about the possibility of an arbitration, because I know I'm not a sock. You brought it up, not I. And your evasiveness about your own charge concerning the "three socks" is intriguing. --] 15:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=787072717 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXVI, August 2017 ==
	==Your comment==
	Hi Cla, could you say what you meant this by comment, please? "Now that 'high administrator' protection for that article has apparently ended, we can methodically work on ensuring that the article belongs on Misplaced Pages ..." ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 19:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	:I was being facetious with that comment. Some of the sources I read that have discussed the Gary Weiss Misplaced Pages entry in outside websites appear to believe that there's a "conspiracy" by high-level administrators to "protect" the Weiss entry. I don't believe that to be true. I can see in past actions involving that article that administrators have acted to protect it, but I don't believe they were doing so out of some sort of "conspiracy." I believe that it's just an example of extremely busy Misplaced Pages administrators trying to do their job to keep Misplaced Pages running smoothly and just didn't have the time or reason to investigate further what might be occuring with that particular entry, one of thousands that each administrator monitors. In that case, it's up to "regular" editors like me, who in addition to our regular projects (military history articles for me) sometimes try to assist the community in finding and resolving abuses occuring on Misplaced Pages. The Gary Weiss article, to me, is an egregious example of someone using Misplaced Pages for self-promotion and putting a lot of time and effort into "gaming" the Misplaced Pages system. I believe the "system" works and that we can bring that article back into the community, put it into the proper form for Misplaced Pages, and let it be one more small step in the continuous effort to, not only improve Misplaced Pages's body of knowledge, but to further improve Misplaced Pages's credibility in the world on-line community. ] 23:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=789297949 -->

			== If you ever pop in... ==
	::Thanks for your note. Be careful about repeating material from attack sites, or believing any of it. The truth is that no one knows who has edited that or any other article, unless the person has identified themselves, and it's a violation of Misplaced Pages policy to attempt to out someone, whether the details are accurate or not. The best thing, as you say, is to keep an eye on the article so that POV in either direction can be countered or removed; if everyone edits in accordance with the content policies, there won't be a problem. Cheers, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
	:::Thank you for your concern and attention on the matter. There won't be a problem if whoever or whomever it is that's trying so hard to keep that article in it's present form allows other editors to add citations or delete uncited text and place additional information (as long as it's cited and credible) to the entry in accordance with Misplaced Pages's established guidelines. Up until now, that doesn't appear to have happened. In accordance with Misplaced Pages rules, I won't try to find out exactly who (if it is a particular person) may be behind what's going on with that article. But I will try to correct the problems that have been ongoing with that article since its inception, using Misplaced Pages's system for conflict resolution. ] 03:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::You say something or other "doesn't appear to have happened." What <i>has</i> happened is that the ] page has been a subject of repeated vandalism from one editor and one editor alone - the banned editor and notorious troll you keep chatting with, ]. This edit - in which you added the phrase "self promotional" to a descriptiion the Weiss website - is classic WordBomb, and so is your other behavior on the Gary Weiss page, its talk page, as well as your reversion of WordBomb "warnings" to my talk page and Amoroso's. Even if you are not WordBomb, your are doing an excellent imitation of one. Your repeated warm dialogue with the confirmed WordBomb sockpuppet was classic WordBomb. Your AfD was classic ] as well as classic WordBomb. I suggest that you desist.--] 09:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::In my opinion, you're attacking the messenger, not the message. The problem is that much of the article is uncited and appears to come from Weiss' blog or personal website. Also, cited and referenced material, neutrally presented, is deleted without discussion. The structure of the article, as commented on by other editors in the AfD discussion, contains material that is promotional and inappropriate in nature for a Misplaced Pages entry. Everytime you attack my credibility, I'll repeat this same list of problems that currently exist in the article, because these problems are the entire crux of the matter. Once these issues are resolved, there will no longer be a problem because I, and the rest of the community, will have done our duty in helping resolve this situation. Have you complained to the other editors from the AfD discussion who expressed similar concerns to mine? I'm not the only one that feels that the article has problems that need to be remedied. ] 09:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
	::::::: You keep on making broad generalities such as "cited and referenced material, neutrally presented, is deleted without discussion" when in fact the problem is a limited number of POV-pushing edits by yourself over a period of several hours. There was nothing "neutral" about this edit . It was, as I pointed out, on the cusp between crude POV pushing and vandalism. The other significant problematic edit was your adding an entire section on a ten-year-old, withdrawn lawsuit that was inaccurately described by yourself. Yes, your wording of it was neutral, which was why I did not challenge it when I first saw it. However, a few days later I read the cited editor's note and saw that you were totally mischaracterizing what had happened.
	::::::: As for the supposed "sourcing" problems with the article -- this is a <i>brief</i> article about a journalist taken from the public record that recites his background in a neutral fashion. Using routine biographical material (worked at a paper in Connecticut, etc.) from the personal website of the subject of an article is routine practice. This article is no different from the dozens of other articles about journalists that are the subject of articles in Wiki. The only difference is that this journalist is the subject of a smear campaign, of which an essential part is that attack website you are quoting and whose attitudes you reflect. Your harping on this is further evidence of your bad faith and agenda.
	::::::: As I see it, the only "problems" with this article is the waste of time involved in dealing with your POV pushing and disruptive behavior. You came to this article with a massive chip on your shoulder and have been aggressive and hostile, as the result of being either a flag-bearer for the attack website you have quoted or being a sockpuppet yourself. Either way, your behavior is unacceptable.--] 10:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::: Once the AfD has run its course, and if the article is voted to be '''kept''', I, and any other interested editors, will show how the article should look based on any credible references that exist. You can decide what to do after that. ] 10:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			Please could you take a look at ], re ]. Thanks. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small>
	:::::::::Cla, thank you for your note. I applaud your desire to get the article in shape, but I do urge caution. The article is under attack by sockpuppets of a banned user. You should not restore any warning templates to Mantanmoreland's talk page, in case they were placed there by the banned user. You should also not make edits such as . Please review the content policies very carefully, particularly ]. This states that personal websites, including blogs, may be used as sources in articles about the author, although they should be used with caution. ]. You should therefore not remove material simply because it is sourced to one of Weiss's websites, nor should you write anything to suggest the website can't be trusted. Also, please don't imply sockpuppetry of regular editors without strong evidence: Christofurio, for example, is not a sockpuppet. I strongly urge you to put out of your mind anything you may have read on an attack website and simply approach this article with a view to ensuring that it neutrally represents the positions of '''all reliable published sources''', which includes Gary Weiss's own material. If you stick to doing that, you won't go far wrong. For what it's worth, I've advised Mantanmoreland to consider not editing this article anymore, simply because of the amount of grief it's causing him. However, the more aggressively it's edited by others, the more he will feel the need to remain involved, so please bear that in mind too. Cheers, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 18:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			:{{ul\|Dweller}}, I took a look at this article, and I think it holds up quite well. Cla last edited it in November 2015 and there is nothing to preclude its appearance on the main page, if that is your aim. (As I'm sure you know, the battle lasted from 25 to 27 October 1942; the first two dates have been requested for other articles but the 27th is available.) I have some of the sources Cla used and can assist with any work that should be done for TFA. ] (]) 21:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
	::::::::::No problem. Actually, I was planning on using Weiss' official site as a reference when I work on it. I really don't think Matanmoreland has as much to fear from me as he thinks he does. Also, I don't think I accused Christofurio of being a sockpuppet, although the way he approached me about it made me wary, based on how other defenders of that article have acted with regard to this issue. ] 23:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
			::Hi {{u\|Kablammo}}. Thanks for the reply. Can you help with checking/adding sources to the paragraph identified as problematic? --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 10:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
			And NB I've now nominated ] for main page on Feb 9 2018, 75th anniv of its conclusion. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 14:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

			Sorry I hadn't realised you were blocked. You'd think the pink message above would have given it away. Glad Kablammo is able to help. If you do ever return to Misplaced Pages, please say hello. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 10:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXVII, September 2017 ==
	== Cleanup request ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
	Re yer note on my page, I appreciate the civil tone but to be frank I simply don't believe any cleanup is necessary and that the article is fine as it is. This is a basic brief journalist bio written in neutral tone and is comparable to similar journalist bios. See ], ] and pretty much every other journo biog you can find. Posner's doesn't have a single cite and the source is obviously his website. I fail to see how festooning Posner's bio with cites and footnotes pointing to his site adds much value and it is the same for Weiss. I simply took the bio data out of that website , and you are right that the site is down. I agree that the libel suit does not belong, as it is undue weight at the current length as well as anything shorter. It is fairly brief as is and I can't see much point in cutting, except maybe the quote.--] 10:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=798263012 -->

			== 2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election ==

			Greetings from the ]! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the ]. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, ] (]) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:AustralianRupert@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=801461363 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017 ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=803268167 -->

			== ] scheduled for TFA ==

			Charles, the ] article has been scheduled as ] for October 27, 2017. Regards, ] (]) 21:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

			Thank you, Cla! --] (]) 06:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXXXIX, November 2017 ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=804291814 -->

			== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXL, December 2017 ==

			{\| style="width: 100%;"
			\| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" \|
			{\|
			\| ]
			\| width="100%" valign="top" \| <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
			<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
			* Project news: '']''
			* Articles: '']''
			* Book review: '']''
			* Op-ed: '']''
			* Timeline: '']''
			</div>
			\|-
			\|}
			\|}
			<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
			''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=810011073 -->

			== ] ==

			Cla68, I received this message a short while ago:
			<blockquote>This is to let you know that ] has been scheduled as ] for 7 February 2018. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at ]. ] - ] 16:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)</blockquote>
			Congratulations, and thanks for your efforts in bringing not only this article, but the other 17 articles on this topic to featured status. ] (]) 16:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

			== ] as TFA for September 24, 2018 ==

			This is to let you know that the article mentioned above has been scheduled as ] for September 24, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at ].--] (]) 23:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
			: Thank you for the article on a "Japanese withdrawal from Guadalcanal during the Guadalcanal Campaign of World War II"! --] (]) 12:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

			== ] scheduled for TFA ==

			This is to let you know that the ] article has been scheduled as ] for October 23, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at ], but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! ] - ] 14:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

			Thank you, Cla! --] (]) 08:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

			{{User QAIbox
			\| title = Precious
			\| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
			\| image_upright = 0.55
			\| bold = ]
			}}
			--] (]) 08:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

			==Orphaned non-free image File:Gang Lu.jpg==
			] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

			Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
			==Orphaned non-free image File:GaijinHanzaiMagazine.jpg==
			] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

			Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
			==Orphaned non-free image File:GaijinHanzaiMagazine.jpg==
			] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

			Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

			== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago ==
			{{User QAIbox
			\| title = Awesome
			\| image = Cscr-featured.svg
			\| image_upright = 0.35
			\| bold = ]
			}}
			--] (]) 15:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

			==] scheduled for TFA==
			This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as ] for 21 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at ], or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at ]. I suggest that you watchlist ] from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. ] (]) 20:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

			Thank you today for the article! --] (]) 05:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

			== A kitten for you! ==

			]
			hey, I appreciate all of the work you have done for the Pacific War and more on this site it is a very noble pursuit even if this site isn't perfect. I wish you the best as a fellow history nerd

			] (]) 01:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
			<br style="clear: both;"/>

			==] scheduled for TFA==

			This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as ] for 7 February 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at ], or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at ]. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by ], who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist ] from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! ] (]) 18:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:32, 28 December 2024

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum"
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Indeffed

If Cla68 is indeffed blocked, why does it not say that on his user page ? Just wondering, like TUXLIE 10:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Scarlet letters are not required. Don't post on this page again, as the user can't respond here — take concerns somewhere else. Bishonen | talk 10:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC).

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two)
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland
Timeline: Events of World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the great military stories. Mikematic (talk) 15:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military
Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators
Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cla68. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War
Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles
Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works
Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line
Timeline: This month in World War I

Battle of the Coral Sea scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Battle of the Coral Sea article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 4, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/May 4, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine
Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable
Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour
Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography
Timeline: This month in World War I

If you ever pop in...

Please could you take a look at User:Dweller/Featured Articles that haven't been on Main Page, re Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned!

Dweller, I took a look at this article, and I think it holds up quite well. Cla last edited it in November 2015 and there is nothing to preclude its appearance on the main page, if that is your aim. (As I'm sure you know, the battle lasted from 25 to 27 October 1942; the first two dates have been requested for other articles but the 27th is available.) I have some of the sources Cla used and can assist with any work that should be done for TFA. Kablammo (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kablammo. Thanks for the reply. Can you help with checking/adding sources to the paragraph identified as problematic? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

And NB I've now nominated Guadalcanal Campaign for main page on Feb 9 2018, 75th anniv of its conclusion. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I hadn't realised you were blocked. You'd think the pink message above would have given it away. Glad Kablammo is able to help. If you do ever return to Misplaced Pages, please say hello. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive
Timeline: This month in World War I

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution
Timeline: This month in World War I

Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands scheduled for TFA

Charles, the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 27, 2017. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Cla! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917
Timeline: This month in World War I

Guadalcanal Campaign

Cla68, I received this message a short while ago:

This is to let you know that Guadalcanal Campaign has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 February 2018. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/February 7, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thanks for your efforts in bringing not only this article, but the other 17 articles on this topic to featured status. Kablammo (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Operation Ke as TFA for September 24, 2018

This is to let you know that the article mentioned above has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 24, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/September 24, 2018.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the article on a "Japanese withdrawal from Guadalcanal during the Guadalcanal Campaign of World War II"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Battle for Henderson Field scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Battle for Henderson Field article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 23, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/October 23, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Cla! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gang Lu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gang Lu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GaijinHanzaiMagazine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GaijinHanzaiMagazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:GaijinHanzaiMagazine.jpg

⚠

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Battle of the Tenaru scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 21 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/August 21, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

hey, I appreciate all of the work you have done for the Pacific War and more on this site it is a very noble pursuit even if this site isn't perfect. I wish you the best as a fellow history nerd

CanonHistory (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Mount Austen, the Galloping Horse, and the Sea Horse scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 February 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/February 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/February 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 18:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)