Revision as of 00:24, 5 September 2018 editMirza1453 (talk | contribs)38 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:02, 18 December 2024 edit undoInsanityclown1 (talk | contribs)467 edits Cleaned up grammar | ||
(131 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|War lasting from 1918 to 1921 during the Turkish War of Independence}} | |||
{{More citations needed|date=October 2010}} | {{More citations needed|date=October 2010}} | ||
{{Infobox military conflict | {{Infobox military conflict | ||
|conflict=Franco-Turkish War | | conflict = Franco-Turkish War | ||
|partof=the ] | | partof = the ] | ||
| image = Türk Kurtuluş Savaşı güney cephesi kolaj.jpg | |||
|image=Armenian legion.png | |||
|image_size= |
| image_size = 300px | ||
| caption = '''Clockwise from top to left:''' Turkish prisoners of war after the ], ] in the French army, French-Armenian Legion volunteers, Turkish guerrillas in 1919, Sütçü İmam's shooting of a French soldier, Turkish guerrillas in Urfa. | |||
|caption=Armenian volunteer soldiers in the French Army | |||
|date=December 1918<ref> (Turkish)</ref> – October 1921 | | date = 7 December 1918<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315133836/http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-41/milli-mucadelede-ilk-kursun-ve-dortyolun-dusman-isgalinden-kurtulusu |date=2018-03-15 }} (Turkish)</ref> – 20 October 1921<br />({{Age in months, weeks and days|month1=12|day1=07|year1=1918|month2=10|day2=20|year2=1921}}) | ||
|place=] and ] | | place = ], ], and ] | ||
|casus=] | | casus = ] | ||
| territory = ] ceded to Turkey <br /> Today's ] (excluding ]) was formed. | |||
|territory= | |||
|result=Turkish victory | | result = Turkish victory | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
|combatant1={{flagcountry| |
| combatant1 = {{flagcountry|French Third Republic}} | ||
* {{flagicon|Armenia|1918}} <small>]</small> | * {{flagicon|Armenia|1918}} <small>]</small> | ||
|combatant2={{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ] | | combatant2 = {{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} <small>]</small> | * {{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} <small>]</small> | ||
|commander1={{flagicon| |
| commander1 = {{flagicon|French Third Republic}} ] | ||
|commander2={{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} Şefik "Özdemir" Bey | | commander2 = {{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]<br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} Şefik "Özdemir" Bey <br />{{flagicon image|Ottoman_flag_alternative_2.svg}} ]{{KIA}}<ref name= "şahin bey4">Akçora, E., Kilis’in Antep Müdafaasındaki Yeri. Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. URL:http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-31/kilisin-antep-mudafaasindaki-yeri {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170116160443/http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-31/kilisin-antep-mudafaasindaki-yeri |tarih=16 Ocak 2017 }}. Erişim: 2017-01-14</ref> | ||
|strength1={{flagicon| |
| strength1 = {{flagicon|French Third Republic}}: ''Mar. 1920'': 25,000–30,000<ref>Yücel Güçlü: ''The question of the Sanjak of Alexandretta: A study in Turkish-French-Syrian relations'', Turkish Historical Society Printing House, 2001, {{ISBN|9751614031}}, .</ref><br />''May 1920'': ~40,000 men<ref>Yücel Güçlü, 2001, .</ref><br />''Feb. 1921'': 70,000 men<ref name="annualmeeting">Western Society for French History. Meeting: ''Proceedings of the ... Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History'', New Mexico State University Press, 1996, .</ref><br />{{flagicon|Armenia|1918}}: 10,150 men<ref>Ahmet Hulki Saral, ''Türk İstiklal Harbi Güney Cephesi IV'', Ankara, 1996, pg 47</ref> | ||
Total: 80,000 men | |||
|strength2= |
| strength2 = ~18,000 men (early phase)<ref>]: ''Turkey: A Modern History'', I.B.Tauris, 2004, {{ISBN|1850433992}}, .</ref><br />Total: 25,000 men<ref>Military Training Publishing Corporation, 1921, ''National service (Volumes 9–10)'', .</ref> | ||
|casualties1=Unknown | |||
| casualties1 = {{flagicon|French Third Republic}} 5,000+ dead<Ref>Guclu, Yucel: Armenians and the Allies in Clicia 1914-1923 (2010). University of Utah Press. June 2009. Page 144, quoting Henry Franklin-Bouillon: "In Cilicia, France was expending 5 million francs a year and had buried some 5,000 of its sons..."</ref> | |||
|casualties2=Unknown | | casualties2 = Unknown | ||
|casualties3=Both sides together: |
| casualties3 = Both sides together: 15,000+ casualties<ref>]: ''Vahidettin, M. Kemal ve milli mücadele: yalanlar, yanlışlar, yutturmacalar'', Bilgi Yayınevi, 1997, {{ISBN|9754946698}}, page 444.</ref> | ||
|notes= | |||
| notes = | |||
⚫ | | campaignbox = {{Theaters of the Turkish War of Independence}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
⚫ | {{Theaters of the Turkish War of Independence}} | ||
⚫ | The ''' |
||
⚫ | The '''Franco–Turkish War''', known as the '''Cilicia Campaign''' ({{langx|fr|La campagne de Cilicie}}) in ] and as the '''Southern Front''' ({{langx|tr|Güney Cephesi}}) of the ] in ], was a series of conflicts fought between France (the ] and the ]) and the ] (led by the ] after 4 September 1920) from December 1918 to October 1921 in the ]. French interest in the region stemmed from the ] and was further fueled by the ] following the ]. | ||
Along with the other Allied powers, the French abandoned interest in the Armenian population in favor of supporting Turkey as a ] from ] expansionism.<ref name = "Payaslian">{{citation |title=The History of Armenia |first=Simon |last=Payaslian |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |location=New York |year=2007 |pages=163|isbn=978-1-4039-7467-9|authorlink=Simon Payaslian}}</ref> | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
===Agreements=== | ===Agreements=== | ||
{{Main|Sykes-Picot Agreement}} | {{Main|Sykes-Picot Agreement}} | ||
]]] | ]]] | ||
After the ], the French Army had moved into ] in accordance with the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, |
After the ], the French Army had moved into ] in accordance with the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. On the one hand, that agreement gave France control of ] and southern ], including the key strategic locations of the fertile plain of ], the ports of ] and ] (Alexandretta), and the copper mines in ]. On the other hand, the fertile lands of Mesopotamia and the ] (where oil fields were suspected to exist) were priorities for the British. According to the agreement, the British would look after the cities of ], ] and ], until the French arrived in the southern Anatolian regions allocated to them in the agreement. | ||
The ] under the command of General ] consisted of Armenian volunteers |
The ] under the command of General ] consisted of Armenian volunteers. | ||
==French occupation of |
==French occupation of Anatolia== | ||
===Black Sea landings=== | ===Black Sea landings=== | ||
{{Main article|Samsun Clashes (1920)}} | |||
After the armistice of Mudros, the first thing the French military did was to control the strategically important Ottoman coal mines in which French capital held significant stakes. The goal was both to take control of this energy source and to meet French military needs. It also prevented the distribution of coal in Anatolia, which could be used in activities to support insurgency. | After the armistice of Mudros, the first thing the French military did was to control the strategically important Ottoman coal mines in which French capital held significant stakes. The goal was both to take control of this energy source and to meet French military needs. It also prevented the distribution of coal in Anatolia, which could be used in activities to support insurgency. | ||
On 18 March 1919, two French gunboats brought troops to the Black Sea ports of ] and ] to command the Ottoman coal mining region. Because of the resistance they faced during their one-year stay in the region, French troops |
On 18 March 1919, two French gunboats brought troops to the Black Sea ports of ] and ] to command the Ottoman coal mining region. Because of the resistance they faced during their one-year stay in the region, French troops began to withdraw from Karadeniz Ereğli on 8 June 1920. They continued to pursue their occupation in Zonguldak, where they occupied the whole city on 18 June 1920. | ||
===Constantinople and Thrace operations=== | ===Constantinople and Thrace operations=== | ||
Line 69: | Line 71: | ||
|Antep Defense||]||1 Apr 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 | |Antep Defense||]||1 Apr 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Siege of Antep||Şefik Özdemir Bey||5 August 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 | |Siege of Antep||]||5 August 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 78: | Line 80: | ||
At the eastern tip of the occupation zone in the south, the city of ] was also occupied for one day (on 21 November 1919) until the evening, when the French thought it better to abandon the occupation attempt. | At the eastern tip of the occupation zone in the south, the city of ] was also occupied for one day (on 21 November 1919) until the evening, when the French thought it better to abandon the occupation attempt. | ||
France designated ] governor of the French occupation zone in the south from January 1, 1919 – September 4, 1920, and |
France designated ] governor of the French occupation zone in the south from January 1, 1919 – September 4, 1920, and Julien Dufieux from September 1920–23 December 1921. | ||
In the regions they occupied, the French encountered immediate resistance from the Turkish, especially because they had associated themselves with Armenian objectives. The French soldiers were foreign to the region and were using Armenian militia to acquire their intelligence. Turkish nationals had been in cooperation with Arab tribes in this area. Compared to the ], the French seemed less dangerous to ], who suggested that, if the Greek threat could be overcome, the French would not |
In the regions they occupied, the French encountered immediate resistance from the Turkish, especially because they had associated themselves with Armenian objectives. The French soldiers were foreign to the region and were using Armenian militia to acquire their intelligence. Turkish nationals had been in cooperation with Arab tribes in this area. Compared to the ], the French seemed less dangerous to ], who suggested that, if the Greek threat could be overcome, the French would not hold its territories in Turkey, especially as they mainly wanted to settle in Syria. | ||
The strategic goal of opening a southern front by moving Armenians against the Turkish National forces was a failure after the defeat of the Greek forces to the west. | |||
On 11 February 1920, after 22 days of the ], the French occupation troops, followed by members of the local Armenian community, found themselves forced to evacuate Marash by the resistance and assaults of the Turkish revolutionaries. The loss of the city was accompanied by large-scale massacres of the Armenian population, with thousands of victims. French Armenian Legion member ] suspects in his diary that the French forces gave weapons and ammunition to the Kemalists to allow the French army safe passage out of Cilicia.<ref>]: . The Independent. Retrieved 12 May 2013.</ref> | On 11 February 1920, after 22 days of the ], the French occupation troops, followed by members of the local Armenian community, found themselves forced to evacuate Marash by the resistance and assaults of the Turkish revolutionaries. The loss of the city was accompanied by large-scale massacres of the Armenian population, with thousands of victims. French Armenian Legion member ] suspects in his diary that the French forces gave weapons and ammunition to the Kemalists to allow the French army safe passage out of Cilicia.<ref>]: . The Independent. Retrieved 12 May 2013.</ref> | ||
Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
{{Main|Treaty of Ankara (1921)}} | {{Main|Treaty of Ankara (1921)}} | ||
The Cilicia Peace Treaty between France and the Turkish National Movement was signed on 9 March 1921. It was intended to end the Franco-Turkish war,<ref> |
The Cilicia Peace Treaty between France and the Turkish National Movement was signed on 9 March 1921. It was intended to end the Franco-Turkish war,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.indiana.edu/~league/1921.htm |title=League of Nations – Chronology 1921 |access-date=2011-03-09 |archive-date=2010-12-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101213062958/http://www.indiana.edu/~league/1921.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> but failed to do so and was replaced in October 1921 with the ] signed by representatives of the French and the Turks on 20 October 1921, and finalized with ]. | ||
==Withdrawal and population movements== | ==Withdrawal and population movements== | ||
Line 98: | Line 100: | ||
The French forces withdrew from the occupation zone in the first days of 1922, about ten months before the Armistice of Mudanya. Beginning on 3 January, French troops evacuated ] and ]. On 5 January they left ], ] and ]. The evacuation was completed on 7 January with the last troops leaving ]. | The French forces withdrew from the occupation zone in the first days of 1922, about ten months before the Armistice of Mudanya. Beginning on 3 January, French troops evacuated ] and ]. On 5 January they left ], ] and ]. The evacuation was completed on 7 January with the last troops leaving ]. | ||
In the early stages of the ], French and Greek troops jointly crossed the ] and occupied the town of ] in eastern Thrace and the railway route from there to the station of Hadımköy near ] on the outskirts of Constantinople. In September 1922, at the end of that war, during the Greek pull-out after the advance of ], French forces withdrew from their positions near the ], but the British seemed prepared to hold their ground. The British government issued a request for military support from its colonies. This was refused, and the French leaving the British on the straits signaled that the Allies were unwilling to intervene in aid of Greece. Greek troops and the French withdrew beyond the ]. | In the early stages of the ], French and Greek troops jointly crossed the ] and occupied the town of ] in eastern Thrace and the railway route from there to the station of Hadımköy near ] on the outskirts of Constantinople. In September 1922, at the end of that war, during the Greek pull-out after the advance of ], French forces withdrew from their positions near the ], but the British seemed prepared to hold their ground. The British government issued a request for military support from its colonies{{which?|date=November 2022}}. This was refused{{by whom?|date=November 2022}}, and the French leaving the British on the straits signaled that the Allies were unwilling to intervene in aid of Greece. Greek troops and the French withdrew beyond the ]. | ||
==Aftermath== | ==Aftermath== | ||
{{See also|French Mandate of Syria}} | |||
] | |||
Along with the other Allied powers, the French abandoned interest in the Armenian population in favor of supporting Turkey as a ] from ] expansionism.<ref name="Payaslian"/> | |||
France had better relations with the Turkish nationals during the ], chiefly on account of breaking ] solidarity and signing a separate agreement with the ].{{according to whom|date=May 2012}} The Treaty of Ankara did not resolve the problems{{clarify|date=March 2011}} in connection with the ]. However, positive Franco-Turkish relations were maintained. French policy supporting the Turkish independence movement were set back during the ] on the abolition of the ]. French objections during the discussions on abolition were perceived as contravening full Turkish independence and sovereignty. Furthermore, the fact that the sanjak of Alexandretta remained under French control also contributed to the tension between the two countries, as the Turks claimed the land in the ]. The positive attitude developed with the Treaty of Ankara remained friendly, if limited. | France had better relations with the Turkish nationals during the ], chiefly on account of breaking ] solidarity and signing a separate agreement with the ].{{according to whom|date=May 2012}} The Treaty of Ankara did not resolve the problems{{clarify|date=March 2011}} in connection with the ]. However, positive Franco-Turkish relations were maintained. French policy supporting the Turkish independence movement were set back during the ] on the abolition of the ]. French objections during the discussions on abolition were perceived as contravening full Turkish independence and sovereignty. Furthermore, the fact that the sanjak of Alexandretta remained under French control also contributed to the tension between the two countries, as the Turks claimed the land in the ]. The positive attitude developed with the Treaty of Ankara remained friendly, if limited. | ||
The Ottoman debts were cleared by the ] in line with the ]. | The Ottoman debts were cleared by the ] in line with the ]. | ||
Line 111: | Line 110: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
⚫ | {{Commons category}}{{Turkish War of Independence}} | ||
* Armenian history site with information about the French Cilicia Campaign. | |||
⚫ | {{Turkish War of Independence}} | ||
{{Middle East conflicts}} | {{Middle East conflicts}} | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
Line 134: | Line 133: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 18:02, 18 December 2024
War lasting from 1918 to 1921 during the Turkish War of IndependenceThis article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Franco-Turkish War" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Franco-Turkish War | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Turkish War of Independence | |||||||||
Clockwise from top to left: Turkish prisoners of war after the Siege of Aintab, Armenian volunteers in the French army, French-Armenian Legion volunteers, Turkish guerrillas in 1919, Sütçü İmam's shooting of a French soldier, Turkish guerrillas in Urfa. | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
Henri Gouraud |
Ali Fuat Pasha Ali Saip Bey "Kılıç" Ali Bey Şefik "Özdemir" Bey Şahin Bey † | ||||||||
Strength | |||||||||
: Mar. 1920: 25,000–30,000 |
~18,000 men (early phase) Total: 25,000 men | ||||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||||
5,000+ dead | Unknown | ||||||||
Both sides together: 15,000+ casualties |
Turkish War of Independence | |
---|---|
|
The Franco–Turkish War, known as the Cilicia Campaign (French: La campagne de Cilicie) in France and as the Southern Front (Turkish: Güney Cephesi) of the Turkish War of Independence in Turkey, was a series of conflicts fought between France (the French Colonial Forces and the French Armenian Legion) and the Turkish National Forces (led by the Turkish provisional government after 4 September 1920) from December 1918 to October 1921 in the aftermath of World War I. French interest in the region stemmed from the Sykes-Picot Agreement and was further fueled by the refugee crisis following the Armenian genocide.
Background
Agreements
Main article: Sykes-Picot AgreementAfter the Armistice of Mudros, the French Army had moved into Çukurova in accordance with the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. On the one hand, that agreement gave France control of Ottoman Syria and southern Anatolia, including the key strategic locations of the fertile plain of Çukurova, the ports of Mersin and İskenderun (Alexandretta), and the copper mines in Ergani. On the other hand, the fertile lands of Mesopotamia and the vilayet of Mosul (where oil fields were suspected to exist) were priorities for the British. According to the agreement, the British would look after the cities of Antep, Marash and Urfa, until the French arrived in the southern Anatolian regions allocated to them in the agreement.
The French Armenian Legion under the command of General Edmund Allenby consisted of Armenian volunteers.
French occupation of Anatolia
Black Sea landings
Main article: Samsun Clashes (1920)After the armistice of Mudros, the first thing the French military did was to control the strategically important Ottoman coal mines in which French capital held significant stakes. The goal was both to take control of this energy source and to meet French military needs. It also prevented the distribution of coal in Anatolia, which could be used in activities to support insurgency.
On 18 March 1919, two French gunboats brought troops to the Black Sea ports of Zonguldak and Karadeniz Ereğli to command the Ottoman coal mining region. Because of the resistance they faced during their one-year stay in the region, French troops began to withdraw from Karadeniz Ereğli on 8 June 1920. They continued to pursue their occupation in Zonguldak, where they occupied the whole city on 18 June 1920.
Constantinople and Thrace operations
The main operations in Thrace aimed to support the strategic goals of the allies. A French brigade entered Constantinople on 12 November 1918. On 8 February 1919, French general Franchet d'Espèrey—commander-in-chief of allied occupation forces in the Ottoman Empire—arrived in Constantinople to coordinate the occupation government.
The city of Bursa—a former Ottoman capital of central importance in northwest Anatolia—was also held by French forces for a brief period before the great summer offensive of the Greek army in 1920, at which time that city fell to the Greeks.
Cilicia Campaign
Battle | General | Date |
---|---|---|
Marash | Ali Fuat Cebesoy | 20 Jan – 10 Feb 1920 |
Urfa | Ali Saip Ursavaş | 9 Feb – 11 Apr 1920 |
Antep Defense | Ali Kılıç | 1 Apr 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 |
Siege of Antep | Şefik Özdemir Bey | 5 August 1920 – 9 Feb 1921 |
The first landing took place on 17 November 1918 at Mersin with roughly 15,000 men, mainly volunteers from the French Armenian Legion, accompanied by 150 French officers. The first goals of that expeditionary force were to occupy ports and dismantle the Ottoman administration. On 19 November, Tarsus was occupied in order to secure the surroundings and prepare for the establishment of headquarters in Adana.
After the occupation of Cilicia proper at the end of 1918, French troops occupied the Ottoman provinces of Antep, Marash and Urfa in southern Anatolia at the end of 1919, taking them over from British troops as agreed.
At the eastern tip of the occupation zone in the south, the city of Mardin was also occupied for one day (on 21 November 1919) until the evening, when the French thought it better to abandon the occupation attempt.
France designated Édouard Brémond governor of the French occupation zone in the south from January 1, 1919 – September 4, 1920, and Julien Dufieux from September 1920–23 December 1921.
In the regions they occupied, the French encountered immediate resistance from the Turkish, especially because they had associated themselves with Armenian objectives. The French soldiers were foreign to the region and were using Armenian militia to acquire their intelligence. Turkish nationals had been in cooperation with Arab tribes in this area. Compared to the Greek threat, the French seemed less dangerous to Mustafa Kemal Pasha, who suggested that, if the Greek threat could be overcome, the French would not hold its territories in Turkey, especially as they mainly wanted to settle in Syria.
The strategic goal of opening a southern front by moving Armenians against the Turkish National forces was a failure after the defeat of the Greek forces to the west.
On 11 February 1920, after 22 days of the Battle of Marash, the French occupation troops, followed by members of the local Armenian community, found themselves forced to evacuate Marash by the resistance and assaults of the Turkish revolutionaries. The loss of the city was accompanied by large-scale massacres of the Armenian population, with thousands of victims. French Armenian Legion member Sarkis Torossian suspects in his diary that the French forces gave weapons and ammunition to the Kemalists to allow the French army safe passage out of Cilicia.
Marash militia forces contributed further to the war effort by taking part in the recapture of other centers in the region, forcing the French forces to retreat gradually, town by town.
End of hostilities
Main article: Treaty of Ankara (1921)The Cilicia Peace Treaty between France and the Turkish National Movement was signed on 9 March 1921. It was intended to end the Franco-Turkish war, but failed to do so and was replaced in October 1921 with the Treaty of Ankara signed by representatives of the French and the Turks on 20 October 1921, and finalized with Armistice of Mudanya.
Withdrawal and population movements
See also: Chanak CrisisThe French forces withdrew from the occupation zone in the first days of 1922, about ten months before the Armistice of Mudanya. Beginning on 3 January, French troops evacuated Mersin and Dörtyol. On 5 January they left Adana, Ceyhan and Tarsus. The evacuation was completed on 7 January with the last troops leaving Osmaniye.
In the early stages of the Greco-Turkish War, French and Greek troops jointly crossed the Meriç River and occupied the town of Uzunköprü in eastern Thrace and the railway route from there to the station of Hadımköy near Çatalca on the outskirts of Constantinople. In September 1922, at the end of that war, during the Greek pull-out after the advance of Turkish revolutionaries, French forces withdrew from their positions near the Dardanelles, but the British seemed prepared to hold their ground. The British government issued a request for military support from its colonies. This was refused, and the French leaving the British on the straits signaled that the Allies were unwilling to intervene in aid of Greece. Greek troops and the French withdrew beyond the Meriç River.
Aftermath
France had better relations with the Turkish nationals during the Turkish War of Independence, chiefly on account of breaking Triple Entente solidarity and signing a separate agreement with the Turkish National Movement. The Treaty of Ankara did not resolve the problems in connection with the sanjak of Alexandretta. However, positive Franco-Turkish relations were maintained. French policy supporting the Turkish independence movement were set back during the Conference of Lausanne on the abolition of the Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire. French objections during the discussions on abolition were perceived as contravening full Turkish independence and sovereignty. Furthermore, the fact that the sanjak of Alexandretta remained under French control also contributed to the tension between the two countries, as the Turks claimed the land in the Misak-ı Millî. The positive attitude developed with the Treaty of Ankara remained friendly, if limited.
The Ottoman debts were cleared by the Republic of Turkey in line with the Treaty of Lausanne.
See also
- Chronology of the Turkish War of Independence
- French campaign in Egypt and Syria
- France–Turkey relations
References
- Millî Mücadele'de İlk Kurşun ve Dörtyol'un Düşman İşgalinden Kurtuluşu Archived 2018-03-15 at the Wayback Machine (Turkish)
- Akçora, E., Kilis’in Antep Müdafaasındaki Yeri. Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. URL:http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-31/kilisin-antep-mudafaasindaki-yeri Archived 2017-01-16 at the Wayback Machine. Erişim: 2017-01-14
- Yücel Güçlü: The question of the Sanjak of Alexandretta: A study in Turkish-French-Syrian relations, Turkish Historical Society Printing House, 2001, ISBN 9751614031, page 36.
- Yücel Güçlü, 2001, page 36.
- Western Society for French History. Meeting: Proceedings of the ... Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History, New Mexico State University Press, 1996, page 206.
- Ahmet Hulki Saral, Türk İstiklal Harbi Güney Cephesi IV, Ankara, 1996, pg 47
- Erik Jan Zürcher: Turkey: A Modern History, I.B.Tauris, 2004, ISBN 1850433992, page 149.
- Military Training Publishing Corporation, 1921, National service (Volumes 9–10), page 287.
- Guclu, Yucel: Armenians and the Allies in Clicia 1914-1923 (2010). University of Utah Press. June 2009. Page 144, quoting Henry Franklin-Bouillon: "In Cilicia, France was expending 5 million francs a year and had buried some 5,000 of its sons..."
- Turgut Özakman: Vahidettin, M. Kemal ve milli mücadele: yalanlar, yanlışlar, yutturmacalar, Bilgi Yayınevi, 1997, ISBN 9754946698, page 444.
- Finkel, Caroline, Osman's Dream, (Basic Books, 2005), 57; "Istanbul was only adopted as the city's official name in 1930..".
- Robert Fisk: The Armenian hero whom Turkey would prefer to forget. The Independent. Retrieved 12 May 2013.
- "League of Nations – Chronology 1921". Archived from the original on 2010-12-13. Retrieved 2011-03-09.
External links
Turkish War of Independence | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concepts | |||||||||||||||
National awakening | |||||||||||||||
Elections | |||||||||||||||
Issues | |||||||||||||||
Campaigns |
| ||||||||||||||
Agreements |
| ||||||||||||||
Timeline |
List of modern conflicts in the Middle East | |
---|---|
1910s | |
1920s | |
1930s | |
1940s | |
1950s | |
1960s | |
1970s |
|
1980s | |
1990s | |
2000s | |
2010s | |
2020s | |
This list includes World War I and later conflicts (after 1914) of at least 100 fatalities each Prolonged conflicts are listed in the decade when initiated; ongoing conflicts are marked italic, and conflicts with +100,000 killed with bold. |