Revision as of 05:48, 14 September 2018 editWehwalt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,735 edits rv self. I think my point is valid, but you know, given one thing and another around here, I just don't want to get into thisTag: Undo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:23, 25 December 2024 edit undoFurkan1907 (talk | contribs)52 editsmNo edit summary | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{short description|German architect (1905–1981)}} | ||
{{Other uses}} | |||
{{Featured article}} | {{Featured article}} | ||
{{Use |
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2021}} | ||
{{CS1 config|mode=cs2}} | |||
{{Infobox minister | |||
{{Use American English|date=April 2019}} | |||
| birthname = Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer | |||
{{Use shortened footnotes|date=September 2024}} | |||
| image = Bundesarchiv Bild 146II-277, Albert Speer.jpg | |||
{{Infobox officeholder | |||
| image_size = 200px | |||
| |
| image = Bundesarchiv Bild 146II-277, Albert Speer.jpg | ||
| alt = Monochrome photograph of the upper body of Albert Speer, signed at the bottom | |||
| caption = Speer in 1933 | |||
| caption = Speer in 1933 | |||
| office = ] | |||
| office1 = ]{{efn|Until 2 September 1943, the position's official name was Reich Minister of Armaments and Munitions.}} | |||
| term_start = February 8, 1942 | |||
| |
| term_start1 = 8 February 1942 | ||
| term_end1 = 30 April 1945 | |||
| 1blankname = Head of state | |||
| 1blankname1 = ] | |||
| 1namedata = | |||
| 1namedata1 = ] | |||
{{plainlist | | |||
| predecessor1 = ] (as Minister of Armaments and Munitions) | |||
* ] | |||
| successor1 = ] (as Minister of Munitions) | |||
* ] | |||
| office2 = Reich Minister of Industry and Production | |||
}} | |||
| term_start2 = 5 May 1945 | |||
| 2blankname = Head of government | |||
| term_end2 = 23 May 1945 | |||
| 2namedata = | |||
| 1blankname2 = Head of state | |||
{{plainlist | | |||
| 1namedata2 = ] | |||
* Adolf Hitler | |||
| 2blankname2 = Head of government | |||
* ] | |||
| 2namedata2 = ] | |||
}} | |||
| predecessor2 = ''Position established'' | |||
| predecessor = ] (as Minister of Armaments and Munitions) | |||
| successor2 = ''Position abolished'' | |||
| successor = ] (as Minister of Munitions){{efn|name=reappointment}} | |||
| office3 = ] of German Roadways | |||
| birth_date = {{birth date|mf=yes|1905|3|19}} | |||
| term_start3 = 8 February 1942 | |||
| birth_place = ], ], ] | |||
| term_end3 = 23 May 1945 | |||
| death_date = {{death date and age|mf=yes|1981|9|1|1905|3|19}} | |||
| predecessor3 = ] | |||
| death_place = ], ], ] | |||
| successor3 = ''Position abolished'' | |||
| nationality = German | |||
| |
| office4 = ] for Water and Energy | ||
| term_start4 = 8 February 1942 | |||
| spouse = Margarete Weber (1928–1981, his death) | |||
| term_end4 = 23 May 1945 | |||
| children = 6, including ], ], ] | |||
| predecessor4 = ] | |||
| residence = | |||
| successor4 = ''Position abolished'' | |||
| alma_mater = | |||
| office5 = ] | |||
{{plainlist | | |||
| term_start5 = 8 February 1942 | |||
* ] | |||
| term_end5 = 14 April 1944 | |||
* ] | |||
| predecessor5 = ] | |||
* ] | |||
| successor5 = ] | |||
}} | |||
| office6 = General Building Inspector<br /> for the Reich Capital | |||
| profession = Architect, government official, author | |||
| term_start6 = 30 January 1937 | |||
| signature = Albert Speer Signature.svg | |||
| term_end6 = 23 May 1945 | |||
| footnotes = | |||
| predecessor6 = ''Position created'' | |||
| successor6 = ''Position abolished'' | |||
| birth_name = Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer | |||
| birth_date = {{birth date|df=yes|1905|3|19}} | |||
| birth_place = ], ], ] | |||
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=yes|1981|9|1|1905|3|19}} | |||
| death_place = London, England | |||
| party = ] (1931–1945) | |||
| residence = | |||
| profession = Architect, government official, author | |||
| cabinet = ]<br />] | |||
| signature = Albert Speer Signature.svg | |||
| footnotes = | |||
| module = '''Criminal conviction'''{{Infobox criminal | |||
|child = yes | |||
|conviction = ] <br />] | |||
| trial = Nuremberg trials | |||
| conviction_penalty = 20 years imprisonment | |||
| targets = Millions of ]; ] and others | |||
| imprisoned = ] | |||
}} | |||
| education = ]<br />]<br />] | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer''' |
'''Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer''' ({{IPAc-en|ʃ|p|ɛər}}; {{IPA|de|ˈʃpeːɐ̯|lang|De-Albert Speer.ogg|lang}}; 19 March 1905 – 1 September 1981) was a German ] who served as the ] in ] during most of ]. A close ally of ], he was convicted at the ] and sentenced to 20 years in prison. | ||
Speer joined the ] in 1931 |
An architect by training, Speer joined the ] in 1931. His architectural skills made him increasingly prominent within the Party, and he became a member of Hitler's inner circle. Hitler commissioned him to design and construct structures, including the ] and the ] in ]. In 1937, Hitler appointed Speer as General Building Inspector for Berlin. In this capacity he was responsible for the Central Department for Resettlement that ] from their homes in Berlin. In February 1942, Speer was appointed as ]. Using misleading statistics, he promoted himself as having performed an armaments miracle that was widely credited with keeping Germany in the war.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=174–175}} In 1944, Speer established a ] to increase production of fighter aircraft. It became instrumental in exploiting ] for the benefit of the German war effort. | ||
After the war, |
After the war, Albert Speer was among ] charged by the International Military Tribunal for Nazi atrocities. He was found guilty of ] and ], principally for the use of slave labor, narrowly avoiding a death sentence. Having served his full term, Speer was released in 1966. He used his writings from the time of imprisonment as the basis for two autobiographical books, '']'' and '']''. Speer's books were a success; the public was fascinated by the inside view of the Third Reich he provided. He died of a ] in 1981. | ||
Through his autobiographies and interviews, Speer carefully constructed an image of himself as a man who deeply regretted having failed to discover the crimes of the Third Reich. He continued to deny explicit knowledge of, and responsibility for, ]. This image dominated his ] in the decades following the war, giving rise to the "Speer myth": the perception of him as an ] ] responsible for revolutionizing the German war machine. The myth began to fall apart in the 1980s, when the armaments miracle was attributed to ]. Twenty-five years after Speer's death, ] wrote in '']'' that the idea that Speer was an apolitical technocrat was "absurd". ], writing in '']'', stated that much of the increase in Germany's arms production was actually due to systems instituted by Speer's predecessor (]) and that Speer was intimately aware of and involved in the "]"; evidence of which has been conclusively shown in the decades following the Nuremberg trials. | |||
{{TOC limit}} | {{TOC limit}} | ||
== |
==Early years and personal life== | ||
Speer was born in ], into an upper-middle-class family. He was the second of three sons of Luise Máthilde Wilhelmine (Hommel) and ].{{sfn|Schubert|2006|p=5}} In 1918, the family moved |
Speer was born in ], into an upper-middle-class family. He was the second of three sons of Luise Máthilde Wilhelmine (Hommel) and ].{{sfn|Schubert|2006|p=5}} In 1918, the family leased their Mannheim residence and moved to a home they had in Heidelberg.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=15}} ], deputy prosecutor at the ] who later wrote a book about Speer said, "Love and warmth were lacking in the household of Speer's youth."{{sfn|King|1997|p=27}} His brothers, Ernst and Hermann, bullied him throughout his childhood.{{sfn|Taylor|2010|p=124}} Speer was active in sports, taking up skiing and mountaineering.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=23}} He followed in the footsteps of his father and grandfather and studied architecture.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=11–13}} | ||
Speer began his architectural studies at the ] instead of a more highly acclaimed institution because the ] crisis of 1923 limited his parents' income.{{sfn| |
Speer began his architectural studies at the ] instead of a more highly acclaimed institution because the ] limited his parents' income.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=17–18}} In 1924, when the crisis had abated, he transferred to the "much more reputable" Technische Hochschule München (now ]).{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=63}} In 1925, he transferred again, this time to the Technische Hochschule Berlin-Chalottenburg (now ]) where he studied under ], whom Speer greatly admired.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=18–19}} After passing his exams in 1927, Speer became Tessenow's assistant, a high honor for a man of 22.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=34–36}} As such, Speer taught some of his classes while continuing his own postgraduate studies.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=71–73}} In Munich Speer began a close friendship, ultimately spanning over 50 years, with ], who also studied under Tessenow.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=33–34}} | ||
In mid-1922, Speer began courting Margarete (Margret) Weber (1905–1987), the daughter of a successful craftsman who employed 50 workers. The relationship was frowned upon by Speer's class-conscious mother, who felt |
In mid-1922, Speer began courting Margarete (Margret) Weber (1905–1987), the daughter of a successful craftsman who employed 50 workers. The relationship was frowned upon by Speer's class-conscious mother, who felt the Webers were socially inferior. Despite this opposition, the two married in Berlin on 28 August 1928; seven years elapsed before Margarete was invited to stay at her in-laws' home.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=47–49}} The couple would have six children together, but Albert Speer grew increasingly distant from his family after 1933. He remained so even after his release from imprisonment in 1966, despite their efforts to forge closer bonds.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=327–328}} | ||
== |
==Party architect and government functionary== | ||
===Joining the Nazis (1931–1934)=== | |||
].]] | |||
In January 1931, Speer applied for ] membership, and on 1 March 1931, he became member number 474,481.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=24}}{{efn|On 31 January 1931, he also joined the Motor Unit of the SA being a member until autumn 1932. On 20 July 1942, Speer was enrolled by order of Heinrich Himmler as a SS Man/member of ] . However his application was never completed, becoming '']''.{{sfn|Nazi conspiracy and aggression|1946|pp=256–257}}}} The same year, with stipends shrinking amid ], Speer surrendered his position as Tessenow's assistant and moved to Mannheim, hoping to make a living as an architect. After he failed to do so, his father gave him a part-time job as manager of his properties. In July 1932, the Speers visited Berlin to help out the Party before the ]. While they were there his friend, Nazi Party official ] recommended the young architect to ] to help renovate the Party's Berlin headquarters. When the commission was completed, Speer returned to Mannheim and remained there as Hitler ] in January 1933.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=25–26}} | |||
=== Joining the Nazis (1930–1934) === | |||
]]] | |||
The organizers of the 1933 ] asked Speer to submit designs for the rally, bringing him into contact with Hitler for the first time. Neither the organizers nor ] were willing to decide whether to approve the plans, and Hess sent Speer to Hitler's Munich apartment to seek his approval.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=100–101}} This work won Speer his first national post, as Nazi Party "Commissioner for the Artistic and Technical Presentation of Party Rallies and Demonstrations".{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=49}} | |||
Speer stated he was apolitical when he was a young man, and that he attended a Berlin Nazi rally in December 1930 at the urging of some of his students.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=79}} On March 1, 1931, he applied to join the Nazi Party and became member number 474,481.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=15–17}}{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=29}} | |||
{{Nazism sidebar}} | |||
In 1931, Speer surrendered his position as Tessenow's assistant and moved to Mannheim. His father gave him a job as manager of the elder Speer's properties. In July 1932, the Speers visited Berlin to help out the Party prior to the '']'' ]. While they were there, his friend, Nazi Party official ], recommended the young architect to ] to help renovate the Party's Berlin headquarters. Speer agreed to do the work. When the commission was completed, Speer returned to Mannheim and remained there as Hitler ] in January 1933.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=28–30}}{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=22–25}} | |||
Shortly after Hitler came into power, he began to make plans to rebuild the chancellery. At the end of 1933, he contracted ] to renovate the entire building. Hitler appointed Speer, whose work for Goebbels had impressed him, to manage the building site for Troost.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=41}} As Chancellor, Hitler had a residence in the building and came by every day to be briefed by Speer and the building supervisor on the progress of the renovations. After one of these briefings, Hitler invited Speer to lunch, to the architect's great excitement.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=101–103}} Speer quickly became part of Hitler's inner circle; he was expected to call on him in the morning for a walk or chat, to provide consultation on architectural matters, and to discuss Hitler's ideas. Most days he was invited to dinner.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=106}}{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=41–42}} | |||
The organizers of the 1933 ] asked Speer to submit designs for the rally, bringing him into contact with Hitler for the first time. Neither the organizers nor ] were willing to decide whether to approve the plans, and Hess sent Speer to Hitler's Munich apartment to seek his approval.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=100–01}} This work won Speer his first national post, as Nazi Party "Commissioner for the Artistic and Technical Presentation of Party Rallies and Demonstrations".{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=49}} | |||
In the English version of his memoirs, Speer says that his political commitment merely consisted of paying his "monthly dues". He assumed his German readers would not be so gullible and told them the Nazi Party offered a "new mission". He was more forthright in an interview with William Hamsher in which he said he joined the party in order to save "Germany from Communism".{{sfn|Hamsher|1970}} After the war, he claimed to have had little interest in politics at all and had joined almost by chance. Like many of those in power in the Third Reich, he was not an ideologue, "nor was he anything more than an instinctive anti-Semite."{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=24}} Historian ], discussing Speer, said he did not give anti-Jewish public speeches and that his ] can best be understood through his actions—which were anti-Semitic.{{sfn|Reinecke|2017}} Brechtken added that, throughout Speer's life, his central motives were to gain power, rule, and acquire wealth.{{sfn|Brechtken|2017|p=45}} | |||
Shortly after Hitler had come into power, he had started to make plans to rebuild the chancellery. At the end of 1933 he contracted ] to renovate the entire building. Hitler appointed Speer, whose work for Goebbels had impressed him, to manage the building site for Troost.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=41}} As Chancellor, Hitler had a residence in the building and came by every day to be briefed by Speer and the building supervisor on the progress of the renovations. After one of these briefings, Hitler invited Speer to lunch, to the architect's great excitement.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=101–03}} Hitler evinced considerable interest in Speer during the luncheon, and later told Speer that he had been looking for a young architect capable of carrying out his architectural dreams for the new Germany. Speer quickly became part of Hitler's inner circle; he was expected to call on Hitler in the morning for a walk or chat, to provide consultation on architectural matters, and to discuss Hitler's ideas. Most days he was invited to dinner.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=106}}{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=41–42}} | |||
===Nazi architect (1934–1937)=== | |||
The two men found much in common: Hitler spoke of Speer as a "kindred spirit" for whom he had always maintained "the warmest human feelings".{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=42}} The young, ambitious architect was dazzled by his rapid rise and close proximity to Hitler, which guaranteed him a flood of commissions from the government and from the highest ranks of the Party.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=54}} Speer testified at Nuremberg, "I belonged to a circle which consisted of other artists and his personal staff. If Hitler had had any friends at all, I certainly would have been one of his close friends."{{efn|name=Freunde}} | |||
{{Main|Nazi architecture}} | |||
] above the '']'']] | |||
When Troost died on 21 January 1934, Speer effectively replaced him as the Party's chief architect. Hitler appointed Speer as head of the Chief Office for Construction, which placed him nominally on Hess' staff.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=60}} | |||
One of Speer's first commissions after Troost's death was the ''Zeppelinfeld'' stadium in ]. It was used for ] and can be seen in ]'s propaganda film '']''. The building was able to hold 340,000 people.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=59}} Speer insisted that as many events as possible be held at night, both to give greater prominence to his lighting effects and to hide the overweight Nazis.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=131}} Nuremberg was the site of many official Nazi buildings. Many more buildings were planned. If built, the ] in ] would have accommodated 400,000 spectators.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=59}} Speer modified ]'s design for the ] being built for the ]. He added a stone exterior that pleased Hitler.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=65}} Speer designed the German Pavilion for the ].{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=60}} | |||
=== First Architect of Nazi Germany (1934–1939) === | |||
{{clear}} | |||
{{main|Nazi architecture}} | |||
] above the '']'']] | |||
===Berlin's General Building Inspector (1937–1942)=== | |||
When Troost died on January 21, 1934, Speer effectively replaced him as the Party's chief architect. Hitler appointed Speer as head of the Chief Office for Construction, which placed him nominally on Hess's staff.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=60}} | |||
] and the ]]] | |||
On 30 January 1937, Hitler appointed Speer as General Building Inspector for the Reich Capital. This carried with it the rank of ] in the Reich government and gave him extraordinary powers over the Berlin city government.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=64}} He was to report directly to Hitler, and was independent of both the mayor and the ] of Berlin.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=118}} Hitler ordered Speer to develop plans to ]. These centered on a three-mile-long grand boulevard running from north to south, which Speer called the ''Prachtstrasse'', or Street of Magnificence;{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=140}} he also referred to it as the "North–South Axis".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=141}} At the northern end of the boulevard, Speer planned to build the '']'', a huge domed assembly hall over {{convert|700|ft|m|-1}} high, with floor space for 180,000 people. At the southern end of the avenue, a great triumphal arch, almost {{convert|400|ft|m|-1}} high and able to fit the ] inside its opening, was planned. The existing Berlin railroad termini were to be dismantled, and two large new stations built.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=65–70}} Speer hired Wolters as part of his design team, with special responsibility for the ''Prachtstrasse''.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=27}} The outbreak of World War II in 1939 led to the postponement, and later the abandonment, of these plans,{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=71}} which, after Nazi capitulation, Speer himself considered as “awful”.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=550}} | |||
One of Speer's first commissions after Troost's death was the ''Zeppelinfeld'' stadium—the ] ] seen in ]'s propaganda masterpiece '']''. This huge work was able to hold 340,000 people.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=59}} Speer insisted that as many events as possible be held at night, both to give greater prominence to his lighting effects and to hide the individual Nazis, many of whom were overweight.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=131}} Speer surrounded the site with 130 ] ]s. Speer described this as his most beautiful work, and as the only one that stood the test of time.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=58–59}} | |||
] | |||
Nürnberg was to be the site of many more official Nazi buildings, most of which were never built; for example, the ] would have accommodated 400,000 spectators, while an even larger rally ground would have held half a million people.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=59}} While planning these structures, Speer conceived the concept of "]": that major buildings should be constructed in such a way they would leave aesthetically pleasing ruins for thousands of years into the future. Such ruins would be a testament to the greatness of Nazi Germany, just as ] or ] ruins were symbols of the greatness of those civilizations.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=55–56}} | |||
Plans to build a new Reich Chancellery had been underway since 1934. Land had been purchased by the end of 1934 and starting in March 1936 the first buildings were demolished to create space at ].{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=46–47}} Speer was involved virtually from the beginning. In the aftermath of the ], he had been commissioned to renovate the ] on the corner of Voßstraße and ] as headquarters of the '']'' (SA).{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=45}} He completed the preliminary work for the new chancellery by May 1936. In June 1936 he charged a personal honorarium of 30,000 Reichsmark and estimated the chancellery would be completed within three to four years. Detailed plans were completed in July 1937 and the first shell of the new chancellery was complete on 1 January 1938. On 27 January 1938, Speer received plenipotentiary powers from Hitler to finish the new chancellery by 1 January 1939. For propaganda Hitler claimed during the topping-out ceremony on 2 August 1938, that he had ordered Speer to complete the new chancellery that year.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=46–49}} Shortages of labor meant the construction workers had to work in ten-to-twelve-hour shifts.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=53–56}} The '']'' built two concentration camps in 1938 and used the inmates to quarry stone for its construction. A brick factory was built near the ] at Speer's behest; when someone commented on the poor conditions there, Speer stated, "The Yids got used to making bricks while in Egyptian captivity".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=72}} The chancellery was completed in early January 1939.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=53–56}} The building itself was hailed by Hitler as the "crowning glory of the greater German political empire".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=53–56}} | |||
]]] | |||
]]] | |||
When Hitler deprecated ]'s design for the ] for the ] as too ], Speer modified the plans by adding a stone exterior.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=65}} Speer designed the German Pavilion for the ]. The German and ] pavilion sites were opposite each other. On learning (through a clandestine look at the Soviet plans) that the Soviet design included ] seemingly about to overrun the German site, Speer modified his design to include a cubic mass which would check their advance, with a huge eagle on top looking down on the Soviet figures.{{sfn|Paris World Exposition 1937}} Speer received, from ] leader and later fellow Spandau prisoner ], the Golden Hitler Youth Honor Badge with oak leaves.{{sfn|Angolia|1978|p=194}} | |||
During the Chancellery project, the ] of '']'' took place. Speer made no mention of it in the first draft of ''Inside the Third Reich''. It was only on the urgent advice of his publisher that he added a mention of seeing the ruins of the Central Synagogue in Berlin from his car.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=164}} ''Kristallnacht'' accelerated Speer's ongoing efforts to dispossess Berlin's Jews from their homes. From 1939 on, Speer's Department used the ] to evict Jewish tenants of non-Jewish landlords in Berlin, to make way for non-Jewish tenants displaced by redevelopment or bombing.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=116}} Eventually, 75,000 Jews were displaced by these measures.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=120}} Speer denied he knew they were being put on ] and claimed that those displaced were, "Completely free and their families were still in their apartments".{{sfn|Schmidt|1984|p=189}} He also said: " ... en route to my ministry on the city highway, I could see ... crowds of people on the platform of nearby Nikolassee Railroad Station. I knew that these must be Berlin Jews who were being evacuated. I am sure that an oppressive feeling struck me as I drove past. I presumably had a sense of somber events."{{sfn|Schmidt|1984|p=189}} ] said Speer had personally inspected ] and described his comments as an "outright farce".{{sfn|Schmidt|1984|p=190}} Martin Kitchen described Speer's often repeated line that he knew nothing of the "dreadful things" as hollow—not only was he fully aware of the fate of the Jews, he actively participated in their persecution.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=322}} | |||
As Germany started World War II in Europe, Speer instituted quick-reaction squads to construct roads or clear away debris; before long, these units would be used to clear bomb sites.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=115}} Speer used forced Jewish labor on these projects, in addition to regular German workers.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=78}} Construction stopped on the Berlin and Nüremberg plans at the outbreak of war. Though stockpiling of materials and other work continued, this slowed to a halt as more resources were needed for the armament industry.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=39–40}} Speer's offices undertook building work for each branch of the military, and for the SS, using slave labor.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=78}} Speer's building work made him among the wealthiest of the Nazi elite.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=75–76}} | |||
In 1937, Hitler appointed Speer as ] with the rank of undersecretary of state in the Reich government. The position carried with it extraordinary powers over the Berlin city government and made Speer answerable to Hitler alone.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=64}} It also made Speer a member of the ''Reichstag'', though the body by then ].{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=144}} Hitler ordered Speer to develop plans to ]. The plans centered on a three-mile long grand boulevard running from north to south, which Speer called the ''Prachtstrasse'', or Street of Magnificence;{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=140}} he also referred to it as the "North-South Axis".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=141}} At the northern end of the boulevard, Speer planned to build the '']'', a huge assembly hall with a dome which would have been over {{convert|700|ft|m|-1}} high, with floor space for 180,000 people. At the southern end of the avenue a great triumphal arch would rise; it would be almost {{convert|400|ft|m|-1}} high, and able to fit the ] inside its opening. The outbreak of World War II in 1939 led to the postponement, and later the abandonment, of these plans.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=71}} Part of the land for the boulevard was to be obtained by consolidating Berlin's railway system.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=77}} Speer hired Wolters as part of his design team, with special responsibility for the ''Prachtstrasse''.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=27}} When Speer's father saw the model for the new Berlin, he said to his son, "You've all gone completely insane."{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=158}} | |||
==Minister of Armaments== | |||
]]] | |||
===Appointment and increasing power=== | |||
] armband) and ''Heer'' general ] at ] in Finland, December 1943]] | |||
As one of the younger and more ambitious men in Hitler's inner circle, Speer was approaching the height of his power. In 1938, Prussian ] ] had appointed him to the ].{{sfn|Lilla|2005|pp=239, 298}} In 1941, he was elected to the '']'' from electoral constituency 2 (Berlin–West).{{sfn|Wistrich|1982|p=291}} On 8 February 1942, ] ] died in a plane crash shortly after taking off from Hitler's ] at ]. Speer arrived there the previous evening and accepted Todt's offer to fly with him to Berlin. Speer cancelled some hours before take-off because the previous night he had been up late in a meeting with Hitler.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=117–118}} Hitler appointed Speer in Todt's place. ], a British historian, says that the choice was not surprising. Speer was loyal to Hitler, and his experience building prisoner of war camps and other structures for the military qualified him for the job.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=120–121}} Speer succeeded Todt not only as Reich Minister but in all his other powerful positions, including Inspector General of German Roadways, Inspector General for Water and Energy and Head of the Nazi Party's Office of Technology.{{sfn|Wistrich|1982|p=291}} At the same time, Hitler also appointed Speer as head of the ], a massive, government-controlled construction company.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=6}} Characteristically Hitler did not give Speer any clear remit; he was left to fight his contemporaries in the regime for power and control. As an example, he wanted to be given power over all armaments issues under Göring's ]. Göring was reluctant to grant this. However Speer secured Hitler's support, and on 1 March 1942, Göring signed a decree naming Speer "General Plenipotentiary for Armament Tasks" in the Four Year Plan.{{sfn|Carroll|2018|p=234}} Speer proved to be ambitious, unrelenting and ruthless.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=122}} Speer set out to gain control not just of armaments production in the army, but in the whole armed forces.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=122}} It did not immediately dawn on his political rivals that his calls for rationalization and reorganization were hiding his desire to sideline them and take control.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=148–149}} By April 1942, Speer had persuaded Göring to create a three-member ] within the Four Year Plan, which he used to obtain supreme authority over procurement and allocation of raw materials and scheduling of production in order to consolidate German war production in a single agency.{{sfn|U.S. Government|1950|p=374}} | |||
All the while plans to build a new Reich chancellery had been underway since 1934. Land had been purchased by the end of 1934 and starting in March 1936 the first buildings were demolished to create space at ].{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=46–47}} Speer was involved virtually from the beginning. He had been commissioned to renovate the ] on the corner of Voßstraße and ] as a headquarter for the ], who were about to be relocated from Munich to Berlin in the aftermath of the ].{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=45}} and completed the preliminary work for the new chancellery by May 1936. In June 1936 he charged a personal honorarium of 30,000 Reichsmark and estimated that the chancellery would be completed within three to four years. Detailed plans were completed in July 1937 and the first shell of the new chancellery was complete on 1 January 1938. On 27 January 1938 Speer received plenipotentiary powers from Hitler to finish the new chancellery by 1 January 1939. Yet for propagandistic reasons, to prove the vigor and organizational skills of National Socialism, Hitler claimed during the topping-out ceremony on 2 August 1938 that he had ordered Speer to build the new chancellery just that year. Speer reiterated this claim in his memoirs to show that he had been up to that supposed challenge,{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=46–49}} and some of his biographers, most notably Joachim Fest, have followed that account.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=101–06}} The building itself, hailed by Hitler as the "crowning glory of the greater German political empire", was designed as a theatrical set for representation, "to intimidate and humiliate", as historian ] puts it. Because of shortages of labor, the construction workers had to work in two ten- to twelve-hour shifts to have the chancellery completed by early January 1939.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=53–56}} | |||
Speer was fêted at the time, and in the post-war era, for performing an "armaments miracle" in which German war production dramatically increased. This miracle was brought to a halt in the summer of 1943 by, among other factors, the ] sustained ] ].{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=597–598}} Other factors probably contributed to the increase more than Speer himself. Germany's armaments production had already begun to result in increases under his predecessor, Todt. Naval armaments were not under Speer's supervision until October 1943, nor the Luftwaffe's armaments until June of the following year. Yet each showed comparable increases in production despite not being under Speer's control.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=368–370}} Another factor that produced the boom in ammunition was the policy of allocating more coal to the steel industry.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=575–576}} Production of every type of weapon peaked in June and July 1944, but there was now a severe shortage of fuel. After August 1944, oil from the Romanian fields was no longer available. Oil production became so low that any possibility of offensive action became impossible and weaponry lay idle.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=232–233}} | |||
During the war the chancellery was destroyed, except for the exterior walls, by air raids and in the ] in 1945. It was eventually dismantled by the Soviets. Rumor has it that the remains have been used for other building projects like the ], ] or Soviet war memorials in Berlin, but none of these are true.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=56}} | |||
As Minister of Armaments, Speer was responsible for supplying weapons to the army.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=127}} With Hitler's full agreement, he decided to prioritize tank production, and he was given unrivaled power to ensure success.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=145–147}} Hitler was closely involved with the design of the tanks, but kept changing his mind about the specifications. This delayed the program, and Speer was unable to remedy the situation. In consequence, despite tank production having the highest priority, relatively little of the armaments budget was spent on it. This led to a significant German Army failure at the ], a major turning point on the ] against the Soviet ].{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=147–148}} | |||
During the Chancellery project, the ] of ] took place. Speer made no mention of it in the first draft of ''Inside the Third Reich'', and it was only on the urgent advice of his publisher that he added a mention of seeing the ruins of the Central Synagogue in Berlin from his car.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=164}} | |||
As head of Organisation Todt, Speer was directly involved in the construction and alteration of concentration camps. He agreed to expand ] and some other camps, allocating 13.7 million Reichsmarks for the work to be carried out. This allowed an extra 300 huts to be built at Auschwitz, increasing the total human capacity to 132,000. Included in the building works was material to build ], crematoria and morgues. The SS called this "Professor Speer's Special Programme".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=156}} | |||
Speer was under significant psychological pressure during this period of his life. He later remembered: | |||
Speer realized that with six million workers drafted into the armed forces, there was a labor shortage in the war economy, and not enough workers for his factories. In response, Hitler appointed ] as a "manpower dictator" to obtain new workers.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=150}} Speer and Sauckel cooperated closely to meet Speer's labor demands.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=151–152}} Hitler gave Sauckel a free hand to obtain labor, something that delighted Speer, who had requested 1,000,000 "voluntary" laborers to meet the need for armament workers. Sauckel had whole villages in France, Holland and Belgium forcibly rounded up and shipped to Speer's factories.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=159}} Sauckel obtained new workers often using the most brutal methods.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=146–150}} In occupied areas of the Soviet Union, that had been subject to partisan action, civilian men and women were rounded up en masse and sent to work forcibly in Germany.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=165–166}} By April 1943, Sauckel had supplied 1,568,801 "voluntary" laborers, forced laborers, prisoners of war and concentration camp prisoners to Speer for use in his armaments factories. It was for the maltreatment of these people, that Speer was principally convicted at the Nuremberg trials.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=160}} | |||
{{quote | |||
| Soon after Hitler had given me the first large architectural commissions, I began to suffer from anxiety in long tunnels, in airplanes, or in small rooms. My heart would begin to race, I would become breathless, the diaphragm would seem to grow heavy, and I would get the impression that my blood pressure was rising tremendously ... Anxiety amidst all my freedom and power!{{efn|name=Diary Nov, 20, 1949}} | |||
}} | |||
===Consolidation of arms production=== | |||
=== Wartime architect (1939–1942) === | |||
] and aircraft designer ], May 1944]] | |||
].]] | |||
Following his appointment as Minister of Armaments, Speer was in control of armaments production solely for the ]. He coveted control of the production of armaments for the '']'' and '']'' as well. He set about extending his power and influence with unexpected ambition.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=7–8}} His close relationship with Hitler provided him with political protection, and he was able to outwit and outmaneuver his rivals in the regime. Hitler's cabinet was dismayed at his tactics, but, regardless, he was able to accumulate new responsibilities and more power.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=7–8}} By July 1943, he had gained control of armaments production for the ''Luftwaffe'' and ''Kriegsmarine''.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=167–169}} In August 1943, he took control of most of the Ministry of Economics, to become, in ]'s words, "Europe's economic dictator". His formal title was changed on 2 September 1943, to "Reich Minister for Armaments and War Production". He had become one of the most powerful people in Nazi Germany.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=7–8}} | |||
Speer and his hand-picked director of submarine construction {{interlanguage link|Otto Merker|de|Otto Merker (Generaldirektor)}} believed that the shipbuilding industry was being held back by outdated methods, and revolutionary new approaches imposed by outsiders would dramatically improve output.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=614}} This belief proved incorrect, and Speer and Merker's attempt to build the ''Kriegsmarine''{{'}}s new generation of submarines, the ] and ], as ] sections at different facilities rather than at single dockyards contributed to the failure of this strategically important program. The designs were rushed into production, but the completed submarines were crippled by construction flaws. While dozens of submarines were built, few ever entered service.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=616–618}} | |||
Speer supported the ] and ], though he recognized that it would lead to the postponement, at the least, of his architectural dreams.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=115}} In his later years, Speer, talking with his biographer-to-be ], explained how he felt in 1939: "Of course I was perfectly aware that sought world domination ...<nowiki></nowiki>t that time I asked for nothing better. That was the whole point of my buildings. They would have looked grotesque if Hitler had sat still in Germany. All I ''wanted'' was for this great man to dominate the globe."{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=186}} | |||
In December 1943, Speer visited Organisation Todt workers in ], where he seriously damaged his knee and was incapacitated for several months.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=8–9}} He was under the dubious care of Professor ] at a medical clinic called Hohenlychen where patients "mysteriously failed to survive".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=188}} In mid-January 1944, Speer had a lung embolism and fell seriously ill. Concerned about retaining power, he did not appoint a deputy and continued to direct work of the Armaments Ministry from his bedside. Speer's illness coincided with the Allied "]", a series of bombing raids on the German aircraft factories that were a devastating blow to aircraft production.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=188–189}} His political rivals used the opportunity to undermine his authority and damage his reputation with Hitler. He lost Hitler's unconditional support and began to lose power.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=8–9}} | |||
Speer placed his department at the disposal of the '']''. When Hitler remonstrated, and said it was not for Speer to decide how his workers should be used, Speer simply ignored him.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=111–12}} Among Speer's innovations were quick-reaction squads to construct roads or clear away debris; before long, these units would be used to clear bomb sites.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=115}} As the war progressed, initially to great German success, Speer continued preliminary work on the Berlin and Nürnberg plans.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=176–78}}{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=180–81}} Speer also oversaw the construction of buildings for the ''Wehrmacht'' and '']''.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=182}} | |||
] | |||
In response to the Allied Big Week, ] authorized the creation of a ]. Its aim was to ensure the preservation and growth of fighter aircraft production. The task force was established by 1 March 1944, orders of Speer, with support from ] of the Reich Aviation Ministry.{{sfn|Boog|Krebs|Vogel|2006|p=347}} Production of German fighter aircraft more than doubled between 1943 and 1944.{{sfn|Overy|2002|p=343}} The growth, however, consisted in large part of models that were becoming obsolescent and proved easy prey for Allied aircraft.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=582–584}} On 1 August 1944, Speer merged the Fighter Staff into a newly formed ].{{sfn|Uziel|2012|p=82}} | |||
In 1940, ] proposed that Speer pay a visit to Moscow. Stalin had been particularly impressed by Speer's work in Paris, and wished to meet the "Architect of the Reich". Hitler, alternating between amusement and anger, did not allow Speer to go, fearing that Stalin would put Speer in a "rat hole" until a new Moscow arose.{{sfn|Fest|2007|pp=66–67}} When ] in 1941, Speer came to doubt, despite Hitler's reassurances, that his projects for Berlin would ever be completed.{{sfn|Fest|2007|p=69}} | |||
== Minister of Armaments == | |||
=== Appointment and increasing power === | |||
], 1944.]] | |||
<!---] ring by Hitler – May 1943]]---> | |||
On February 8, 1942, Minister of Armaments ] died in a plane crash shortly after taking off from Hitler's ] at ]. Speer, who had arrived in Rastenburg the previous evening, had accepted Todt's offer to fly with him to Berlin, but had cancelled some hours before takeoff (Speer stated in his memoirs that the cancellation was because of exhaustion from travel and a late-night meeting with Hitler). Later that day, Hitler appointed Speer as Todt's successor to all of his posts. In ''Inside the Third Reich'', Speer recounts his meeting with Hitler and his reluctance to take ministerial office, saying that he only did so because Hitler commanded it. Speer also states that ] raced to Hitler's headquarters on hearing of Todt's death, hoping to claim Todt's powers. Hitler instead presented Göring with the '']'' of Speer's appointment.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=193–96}} | |||
The Fighter Staff committee was instrumental in bringing about the increased exploitation of ] in the war economy.{{sfn|Buggeln|p=45|2014}} The SS provided 64,000 prisoners for 20 separate projects from various concentration camps including ]. Prisoners worked for ], ], ] and ], among others.{{sfn|Buggeln|pp=46–48|2014}} To increase production, Speer introduced a system of punishments for his workforce. Those who feigned illness, slacked off, sabotaged production or tried to escape were denied food or sent to concentration camps. In 1944, this became endemic; over half a million workers were arrested.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=215}} By this time, 140,000 people were working in Speer's underground factories. These factories were death-traps; discipline was brutal, with regular executions. There were so many corpses at the Dora underground factory, for example, that the crematorium was overwhelmed. Speer's own staff described the conditions there as "hell".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=221}} | |||
At the time of Speer's accession to the office, the German economy, unlike the British one, was not fully geared for war production. Consumer goods were still being produced at nearly as high a level as during peacetime. No fewer than five "Supreme Authorities" had jurisdiction over armament production—one of which, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, had declared in November 1941 that conditions did not permit an increase in armament production. Few women were employed in the factories, which were running only one shift. One evening soon after his appointment, Speer went to visit a Berlin armament factory; he found no one on the premises.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=139–41}} | |||
The largest technological advance under Speer's command came through the rocket program. It began in 1932 but had not supplied any weaponry. Speer enthusiastically supported the program and in March 1942 made an order for A4 rockets, the predecessor of the world's first ballistic missile, the ]. The rockets were researched at a facility in ] along with the ]. The V-2's first target was Paris on 8 September 1944. The program while advanced proved to be an impediment to the war economy. The large capital investment was not repaid in military effectiveness.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=216}} The rockets were built at an underground factory at ]. Labor to build the A4 rockets came from the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp. Of the 60,000 people who ended up at the camp 20,000 died, due to the appalling conditions.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=221}} | |||
Speer overcame these difficulties by centralizing power over the war economy in himself. Factories were given autonomy, or as Speer put it, "self-responsibility", and each factory concentrated on a single product.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=295}} Backed by Hitler's strong support (the dictator stated, "Speer, I'll sign anything that comes from you"{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=143}}), he divided the armament field according to weapon system, with experts rather than civil servants overseeing each department. No department head could be older than 55—anyone older being susceptible to "routine and arrogance"{{sfn|Fest|2007|p=76}}—and no deputy older than 40. Over these departments was a central planning committee headed by Speer, which took increasing responsibility for war production, and as time went by, for the German economy itself. According to the minutes of a conference at ''Wehrmacht'' High Command in March 1942, "It is only Speer's word that counts nowadays. He can interfere in all departments. Already he overrides all departments ... On the whole, Speer's attitude is to the point."{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=142–44}} Goebbels would note in his diary in June 1943, "Speer is still tops with the ''Führer''. He is truly a genius with organization."{{sfn|Schmidt|1984|p=75}} Speer was so successful in his position that by late 1943, he was widely regarded among the Nazi elite as a possible successor to Hitler.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=376–77}} | |||
On 14 April 1944, Speer lost control of Organisation Todt to his deputy, ].{{sfn| Speer| 1970| pp=432–433}} He opposed the ] on 20 July 1944. He was not involved in the plot, and played a minor role in the regime's efforts to regain control over Berlin after Hitler survived.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=204–205}} After the plot Speer's rivals attacked some of his closest allies and his management system fell out of favor with radicals in the party. He lost yet more authority.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=8}} | |||
] armband) looks on with Field Marshal ] (left) during weapons testing.]] | |||
While Speer had tremendous power, he was of course subordinate to Hitler. Nazi officials sometimes went around Speer by seeking direct orders from the dictator. When Speer ordered peacetime building work suspended, the '']s'' (Nazi Party district leaders) obtained an exemption for their pet projects. When Speer sought the appointment of Hanke as a labor czar to optimize the use of German and slave labor, Hitler, under the influence of ], instead appointed ]. Rather than increasing female labor and taking other steps to better organize German labor, as Speer favored, Sauckel advocated importing more slave labour from the occupied nations – and did so, obtaining workers for (among other things) Speer's armament factories, often using the most brutal methods.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=146–50}} | |||
===Defeat of Nazi Germany=== | |||
On December 10, 1943, Speer visited the underground ] ] factory that used ] labor. Speer claimed after the war that he had been shocked by the conditions there (5.7 percent of the work force died that month).{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=175–76}}{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=370}} | |||
] and ] (right) after their arrest by the British Army in ] in Northern Germany in May 1945]] | |||
Losses of territory and a dramatic expansion of the Allied strategic bombing campaign caused the collapse of the German economy from late 1944. Air attacks on the transport network were particularly effective, as they cut the main centres of production off from essential coal supplies.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=648–651}} In January 1945, Speer told Goebbels that armaments production could be sustained for at least a year.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=652}} However, he concluded that the war was lost after Soviet forces captured the important ]n industrial region later that month.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=259}} Nevertheless, Speer believed that Germany should continue the war for as long as possible with the goal of winning better conditions from the Allies than the ] they insisted upon.{{sfn|Kershaw|2012|p=289}} During January and February, Speer claimed that his ministry would deliver "decisive weapons" and a large increase in armaments production which would "bring about a dramatic change on the battlefield".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=254}} Speer gained control over the railways in February, and asked ] to supply concentration camp prisoners to work on their repair.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=261–262}} | |||
] upon liberation in 1945. Mühldorf supplied slave workers for the ] project.]] | |||
By 1943, the ] had gained air superiority over Germany, and bombings of German cities and industry had become commonplace. However, the Allies in their ] did not concentrate on industry, and Speer was able to overcome bombing losses. In spite of these losses, German production of ] more than doubled in 1943, production of planes increased by 80 percent, and production time for '']''{{'s}} ] was reduced from one year to two months. Production would continue to increase until the second half of 1944.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=168–70}} | |||
By mid-March, Speer had accepted that Germany's economy would collapse within the next eight weeks. While he sought to frustrate directives to destroy industrial facilities in areas at risk of capture, so that they could be used after the war, he still supported the war's continuation. Speer provided Hitler with a memorandum on 15 March, which detailed Germany's dire economic situation and sought approval to cease demolitions of infrastructure. Three days later, he also proposed to Hitler that Germany's remaining military resources be concentrated along the ] and ] rivers in an attempt to prolong the fighting. This ignored military realities, as the German armed forces were unable to match the Allies' firepower and were facing total defeat.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=652–653}}{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=262–263}} Hitler rejected Speer's proposal to cease demolitions. Instead, he issued the "]" on 19 March, which called for the destruction of all infrastructure as the army retreated. Speer was appalled by this order, and persuaded several key military and political leaders to ignore it.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=265–267}} During a meeting with Speer on 28/29 March, Hitler rescinded the decree and gave him authority over demolitions.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=269–270}} Speer ended them, though the army continued to blow up bridges.{{sfn|Kershaw|2012|p=291}}{{efn|For a treatise on this aspect of the war including Speer's involvement see: Randall, Hansen, ''Disobeying Hitler: German Resistance in the Last Year of WWII'', Faber & Faber, 2014, 1st edition, {{ISBN|978-0-571-28451-1}}.}} | |||
=== Consolidation of arms production === | |||
{{Main|Jägerstab|Rüstungsstab}} | |||
In January 1944, Speer fell ill with complications from an inflamed knee, necessitating a leave. According to Speer's post-war memoirs, his political rivals (mainly Göring and ]), attempted to have some of his powers permanently transferred to them during his absence. Speer claimed that SS chief ] tried to have him physically isolated by having Himmler's personal physician ] treat him, though his "care" did not improve his health. Speer's case was transferred to his friend Dr. ], and he slowly recovered.{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=330–13}} | |||
By April, little was left of the armaments industry, and Speer had few official duties.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=275}} Speer visited the '']'' on 22 April for the last time. He met Hitler and toured the damaged Chancellery before leaving Berlin to return to Hamburg.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=263–270}} Speer would later claim in his memoirs that during this visit he "confessed to Hitler that he was disobeying his 'scorched-earth' policy",{{sfn|Evans|1997|p=202}} an assertion which has been described as "pure invention"{{sfn|Evans|1997|p=202}} by historian ]. On 29 April, the day before committing suicide, Hitler dictated a ] which dropped Speer from the successor government. Speer was to be replaced by his subordinate, ].{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=234}} Speer was disappointed that Hitler had not selected him as his successor.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=277}} After Hitler's death, Speer offered his services to Hitler's successor, ].{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=273–281}} On 2 May, Dönitz asked ] to form a new government, and discussions went on about the formation of the administration for the next few days. On May 5, Schwerin von Krosigk presented his cabinet (known as the ]) and Speer was named as Minister of Industry and Production.{{sfn|Jaskot|2002|pp=140–141}} Speer provided information to the Allies, regarding the effects of the air war, and on a broad range of subjects, beginning on 10 May. On 23 May, two weeks after the surrender of German forces, British troops arrested the members of the Flensburg Government and brought Nazi Germany to a formal end.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=288}} | |||
], one of Jägerstab's projects, as found by the ] in 1945.]] | |||
In response to the Allied air raids on aircraft factories, ] authorised the creation of a ], a governmental task force composed of ], Armaments Ministry and ] personnel. Its aim was to ensure the preservation and growth of fighter aircraft production. The task force was established by the 1 March 1944 order of Speer, with support from ] of the Reich Aviation Ministry. Speer and Milch played a key role in directing the activities of the agency, while the day-to-day operations were handled by Chief of Staff ], the head of the Technical Office in the Armaments Ministry.{{sfn|Boog et al|p=347|2006}} Production continued to improve until late 1944, with allied bombing destroying just 9% of German production. Production of German fighter aircraft was more than doubled from 1943 to 1944.{{sfn|Overy|2002|p=343}} | |||
==Post-war== | |||
In April, Speer's rivals for power succeeded in having him deprived of responsibility for construction. Speer sent Hitler a bitter letter, concluding with an offer of his resignation. Judging Speer indispensable to the war effort, Field Marshal ] persuaded Hitler to try to get his minister to reconsider. Hitler sent Milch to Speer with a message not addressing the dispute but instead stating that he still regarded Speer as highly as ever. According to Milch, upon hearing the message, Speer burst out, "The '']'' can kiss my ass!"{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=210}} After a lengthy argument, Milch persuaded Speer to withdraw his offer of resignation, on the condition his powers were restored.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=207–12}} On April 23, 1944, Speer went to see Hitler who agreed that "everything stay as it was, remain the head of all German construction".{{sfn|Speer|1981|pp=232–33}} According to Speer, while he was successful in this debate, Hitler had also won, "because he wanted and needed me back in his corner, and he got me".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=429}} | |||
===Nuremberg trial=== | |||
{{Main|Nuremberg trials}} | |||
] | |||
Speer was taken to several internment centres for Nazi officials and interrogated. In September 1945, he was told that he would be tried for ]s, and several days later, he was moved to Nuremberg and incarcerated there.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=561}} Speer was indicted on four counts: participating in a common plan or ] for the accomplishment of ]; planning, initiating and waging ] and other crimes against peace; war crimes; and ].{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=285}} | |||
The chief United States prosecutor, ], of the ] said, "Speer joined in planning and executing the program to dragoon prisoners of war and foreign workers into German war industries, which waxed in output while the workers waned in starvation."{{sfn|Conot|1983|p=471}} Speer's attorney, Hans Flächsner, successfully contrasted Speer from other defendants{{sfn|Priemel|2016|pp=139–140}} and portrayed him as an artist thrust into political life who had always remained a non-ideologue.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=287–288}} | |||
The Jägerstab was given extraordinary powers over labour, production and transportation resources, with its functions taking priority over housing repairs for bombed out civilians or restoration of vital city services. The factories that came under the Jägerstab program saw their work-weeks extended to 72 hours. At the same time, Milch took steps to rationalise production by reducing the number of variants of each type of aircraft produced.{{sfn|Boog et al|p=348|2006}} | |||
Speer was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, principally for the use of slave labor and forced labor. He was acquitted on the other two counts. He had claimed that he was unaware of Nazi extermination plans, and the Allies had no proof that he was aware. His claim was revealed to be false in a private correspondence written in 1971 and publicly disclosed in 2007.{{sfn|Connolly|2007}} On 1 October 1946, he was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=281–282}} While three of the eight judges (two Soviet and American ]) advocated the death penalty for Speer, the other judges did not, and a compromise sentence was reached after two days of discussions.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=29}} | |||
], one of seven that were completed out of a planned twelve.]] | |||
The Jägerstab was instrumental in bringing about the increased exploitation of ] for the benefit of Germany's war industry and its air force, the ]. The task force immediately began implementing plans to expand the use of slave labour in the aviation manufacturing.{{sfn|Buggeln|p=45|2014}} Records show that SS provided 64,000 prisoners for 20 separate projects at the peak of Jägerstab's construction activities. Taking into account the high mortality rate associated with the underground construction projects, the historian Marc Buggeln estimates that the workforce involved amounted to 80,000−90,000 inmates. They belonged to the various sub-camps of ], ], ] and other camps. The prisoners worked for ], ], ] and ], among others.{{sfn|Buggeln|p=46–48|2014}} | |||
===Imprisonment=== | |||
The cooperation between the Reich Ministry of Aviation, the Ministry of Armaments and the SS proved especially productive. Although intended to function for only six months, already in late May Speer and Milch discussed with Goring the possibility of centralising all of Germany's arms manufacturing under a similar task force. On 1 August 1944, Speer reorganised the Jägerstab into the ] (Armament Staff) to apply the same model of operation to all top-priority armament programs.{{sfn|Uziel|2012|p=82}} | |||
On 18 July 1947, Speer was transferred to ] in Berlin to serve his prison term.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=288}} There he was known as Prisoner Number Five.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=314–315}} Speer's parents died while he was incarcerated. His father, who died in 1947, despised the Nazis and was silent upon meeting Hitler. His mother died in 1952. As a Nazi Party member, she had greatly enjoyed dining with Hitler.{{sfn|Taylor|2010|p=124}} Wolters and longtime Speer secretary Annemarie Kempf, while not permitted direct communication with Speer in Spandau, did what they could to help his family and carry out the requests Speer put in letters to his wife—the only written communication he was officially allowed. Beginning in 1948, Speer had the services of Toni Proost, a sympathetic Dutch orderly, to smuggle mail and his writings.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=292–297}} | |||
The formation of the Rüstungsstab allowed Speer, for the first time, to consolidate key arms manufacturing projects for the three branches of the ] under the authority of his ministry, further marginalising the ]. Several departments, including the once powerful Technical Office, were disbanded or transferred to the new task force.{{sfn|Uziel|2012|p=83}} The task force oversaw the day-to-day development and production activities relating to the ], the ''Volksjäger'' ("people's fighter"), as part of the ].{{sfn|Uziel|2012|pp=83, 240}} | |||
The Rüstungsstab assumed responsibilities for the underground transfer projects of the Jägerstab. In November 1944, 1.8 million square meters of underground space were ready for occupancy, encompassing over 1,000 spaces commissioned by the task force. But by this time German production was beginning to collapse.{{sfn|Overy|2002|p=343}} (Post-war, Speer sought to downplay his involvement with these projects and claimed that only 300,000 square meters had been completed). According to Buggeln, the Rüstungsstab played a key role in maintaining and increasing production of fighter aircraft and ]s.{{sfn|Buggeln|p=43|2014}} | |||
=== Defeat of Nazi Germany === | |||
] | |||
Speer's name was included on the list of members of a post-Hitler government drawn up by the conspirators behind the ] to kill Hitler. The list had a question mark and the annotation "to be won over" by his name, which likely saved him from the extensive purges that followed the scheme's failure.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=224–26}} | |||
When Speer learned in February 1945 that the Red Army had overrun the ]n industrial region, he drafted a memo to Hitler noting that Silesia's coal mines now supplied 60 percent of the Reich's coal. Without them, Speer wrote, Germany's coal production would only be a quarter of its 1944 total—not nearly enough to continue the war. He told Hitler in no uncertain terms that without Silesia, "the war is lost." Hitler merely filed the memo in his safe.{{sfn|Shirer|1960|pp=1096–97}} | |||
By February 1945, Speer was working to supply areas about to be occupied with food and materials to get them through the hard times ahead.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=482}} On March 19, 1945, Hitler issued his ], ordering a ] policy in both Germany and the occupied territories.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=250–51}} The plan included forcing millions of people on a long trek without food or supplies which would have resulted in a "hunger catastrophe" according to Speer; Hitler had no compunction about this, believing that only the "inferior ones" would have survived the battles.{{sfn|Shirer|1960|p=1104}} | |||
Hitler's order, by its terms, deprived Speer of any power to interfere with the decree, and Speer went to confront Hitler, reiterating that the war was lost.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=486–92}} Hitler gave Speer 24 hours to reconsider his position, and when the two met the following day, Speer answered, "I stand unconditionally behind you."{{sfn|Speer|1976|pp=4–6}} However, he demanded the exclusive power to implement the Nero Decree, and Hitler signed an order to that effect. Using this order, Speer worked to persuade generals and ''Gauleiters'' to circumvent the Nero Decree and avoid needless sacrifice of personnel and destruction of industry that would be needed after the war.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=498–504}} Shirer describes this as a "superhuman effort" by Speer and a number of army officials, acting contrary to Hitler's orders, | |||
to save vital communications, plants and stores.{{sfn|Shirer|1960|pp=1104–1105}} | |||
Speer managed to reach a relatively safe area near ] as the Nazi regime finally collapsed, but decided on a final, risky visit to Berlin to see Hitler one more time.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=263–70}} Speer stated at Nuremberg, "I felt that it was my duty not to run away like a coward, but to stand up to him again."{{sfn|Speer cross-examination}} Speer visited the '']'' on April 22. Hitler seemed calm and somewhat distracted, and the two had a long, disjointed conversation in which the dictator defended his actions and informed Speer of his intent to commit suicide and have his body burned. In the published edition of ''Inside the Third Reich'', Speer relates that he confessed to Hitler that he had defied the Nero Decree, but then assured Hitler of his personal loyalty, bringing tears to the dictator's eyes.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=263–70}} Speer biographer Gitta Sereny argued, "Psychologically, it is possible that this is the way he remembered the occasion, because it was how he would have liked to behave, and the way he would have liked Hitler to react. But the fact is that none of it happened; our witness to this is Speer himself."{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=529}} Sereny notes that Speer's original draft of his memoirs lacks the confession and Hitler's tearful reaction, and contains an explicit denial that any confession or emotional exchange took place, as had been alleged in a French magazine article.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=528–31}} | |||
The following morning, Speer left the ''Führerbunker''; Hitler curtly bade him farewell. Speer toured the damaged Chancellery one last time before leaving Berlin to return to Hamburg.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=263–70}} On April 29, the day before committing suicide, Hitler dictated a ] which dropped Speer from the successor government. Speer was to be replaced by his own subordinate, ].{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=234}} | |||
== Post-war == | |||
=== Nuremberg trial === | |||
{{main|Nuremberg trials}} | |||
] after their arrest. Speer (left), ] (center) and ] (right).]] | |||
After Hitler's death, Speer offered his services to the so-called ], headed by Hitler's successor, ], and took a significant role in that short-lived regime as Minister of Industry and Production.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=273–81}} On May 15, an Allied delegation arrived at ], where Speer had accommodations, and asked if he would be willing to provide information on the effects of the air war.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=628}} Speer agreed, and over the next several days, provided information on a broad range of subjects. On May 23, two weeks after the surrender of German forces, British troops arrested the members of the Flensburg Government and brought Nazi Germany to a formal end.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=273–81}} | |||
Speer was taken to several internment centres for Nazi officials and interrogated. In September 1945, he was told that he would be tried for ]s, and several days later, he was taken to ] and incarcerated there.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=561}} Speer was indicted on all four possible counts: first, participating in a common plan or ] for the accomplishment of ]; second, planning, initiating and waging ] and other crimes against peace; third, war crimes; and lastly, ].{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=285}} | |||
] defendants listen to the proceedings (Speer, top seated row, fifth from right).]] | |||
] ] ], the chief U.S. prosecutor at Nuremberg, alleged, "Speer joined in planning and executing the program to dragoon prisoners of war and foreign workers into German war industries, which waxed in output while the workers waned in starvation."{{sfn|Conot|1983|p=471}} Speer's attorney, Dr. Hans Flächsner, presented Speer as an artist thrust into political life, who had always remained a non-ideologue and who had been promised by Hitler that he could return to architecture after the war.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=287–88}} During his testimony, Speer accepted responsibility for the Nazi regime's actions.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=516}} | |||
An observer at the trial, journalist and author ], wrote that, compared to his codefendants, Speer "made the most straightforward impression of all and ... during the long trial spoke honestly and with no attempt to shirk his responsibility and his guilt".{{sfn|Shirer|1960|p=1142–43}} Speer claimed that he had planned to kill Hitler in early 1945 by introducing ] poison gas into the '']'' ventilation shaft.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=293–97}}{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=430–31}} He said his efforts were frustrated by the impracticability of tabun and his lack of ready access to a replacement nerve agent,{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=430–31}} and also by the unexpected construction of a tall chimney that put the air intake out of reach.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=245–46}} Speer stated his motive was despair at realising that Hitler intended to take the German people down with him.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=293–97}} Speer's supposed assassination plan subsequently met with some skepticism, with Speer's architectural rival ] sneering, "the second most powerful man in the state did not have a ladder."{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=246}} | |||
] sentencing]] | |||
Speer was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, though he was acquitted on the other two counts. His claim that he was unaware of Nazi extermination plans, which probably saved him from hanging, was finally revealed to be false in a private correspondence written in 1971 and publicly disclosed in 2007.{{sfn|Connolly|2007}} On 1 October 1946, he was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=281–82}} While three of the eight judges (two Soviet and ]) initially advocated the death penalty for Speer, the other judges did not, and a compromise sentence was reached "after two days' discussion and some rather bitter horse-trading".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=29}} | |||
The court's judgment stated that: | |||
{{quote | |||
|... in the closing stages of the war <nowiki></nowiki> was one of the few men who had the courage to tell Hitler that the war was lost and to take steps to prevent the senseless destruction of production facilities, both in occupied territories and in Germany. He carried out his opposition to Hitler's scorched earth programme ... by deliberately sabotaging it at considerable personal risk.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=306}} | |||
}} | |||
=== Imprisonment === | |||
{{main|Spandau Prison}} | |||
: ''For additional detail on Speer's time at Spandau Prison, see ]'' | |||
].]] | ].]] | ||
In 1949, Wolters opened a bank account for Speer and began fundraising among those architects and industrialists who had benefited from Speer's activities during the war. Initially, the funds were used only to support Speer's family, but increasingly the money was used for other purposes. They paid for Toni Proost to go on holiday, and for bribes to those who might be able to secure Speer's release. Once Speer became aware of the existence of the fund, he sent detailed instructions about what to do with the money.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=292–297}} Wolters raised a total of ]158,000 for Speer over the final seventeen years of his sentence.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=298}} | |||
On July 18, 1947, Speer and his six fellow prisoners, all former high officials of the Nazi regime, were flown from Nuremberg to Berlin under heavy guard.{{sfn|Speer|1976|pp=65–67}} They were taken to Spandau Prison in the British Sector of what became ] where they were designated by number, with Speer given Number Five.{{sfn|Speer|1976|pp=66–67}} Initially, the prisoners were kept in solitary confinement for all but half an hour a day and were not permitted to address each other or their guards.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=309–10}} As time passed, the strict regimen was relaxed, especially during the three months out of four that the three Western powers were in control; the ] took overall control on a monthly rotation.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=602}} | |||
The prisoners were forbidden to write memoirs. Speer was able to have his writings sent to Wolters, however, and they eventually amounted to 20,000 pages.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=316}} He had completed his memoirs by November 1953, and they became the basis of ''Inside the Third Reich''.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=325}} In ''Spandau Diaries'', Speer aimed to present himself as a tragic hero who had made a ] for which he endured a harsh prison sentence.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=321–322}} | |||
Much of Speer's energy was dedicated to keeping fit, both physically and mentally, during his long confinement.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=323}} Spandau had a large enclosed yard where inmates were allocated plots of land for gardening. Speer created an elaborate garden complete with lawns, flower beds, shrubbery, and fruit trees.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=316}} To make his daily walks around the garden more engaging Speer embarked on an imaginary trip around the globe. Speer started his “walk” from Berlin and went eastward across the entirety of Eurasia, crossed the Bering Strait into Alaska and then traveled south down the west coast of North America. Carefully measuring distance travelled each day, he mapped distances to the real-world geography. He had walked more than {{convert|30,000|km}}, ending his sentence near ], Mexico.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=316, 325}} Speer also read, studied architectural journals, and brushed up on English and French. In his writings, Speer claimed to have finished five thousand books while in prison. His sentence of twenty years amounted to 7,305 days, which only allotted one and a half days per book.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=316–317}} | |||
With the draft memoir complete and clandestinely transmitted, Speer sought a new project. He found one while taking his daily exercise, walking in circles around the prison yard. Measuring the path's distance carefully, he set out to walk the distance from Berlin to Heidelberg. He then expanded his idea into a worldwide journey, visualizing the places that he was "traveling" through while walking the path around the prison yard. He ordered guidebooks and other materials about the nations through which he imagined that he was passing so as to envision as accurate a picture as possible.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=316–17}} He meticulously calculated every meter traveled and mapped distances to the real-world geography. He began in northern Germany, passed through Asia by a southern route before entering Siberia, then crossed the ] and continued southwards, finally ending his sentence {{convert|35|km}} south of ], Mexico.{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=447}} | |||
Speer's supporters maintained calls for his release. Among those who pledged support for his sentence to be commuted were ] and US diplomat ].{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=319}} ] was an advocate of his release,{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=319}} putting an end to the de-Nazification proceedings against him,{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=324}} which could have caused his property to be confiscated.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=299–300}} Speer's efforts for an early release came to naught. The Soviet Union, having demanded a death sentence at trial, was unwilling to entertain a reduced sentence.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=320–321}} Speer served a full term and was released at midnight on 1 October 1966.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=324–325}} | |||
Speer devoted much of his time and energy to reading. The prisoners brought some books with them in their personal property, but Spandau Prison had no library; books were sent from Spandau's municipal library.{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=69}} From 1952, the prisoners were also able to order books from the Berlin central library in ].{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=195}} Speer was a voracious reader and he completed well over 500 books in the first three years at Spandau alone.{{sfn|Fishman|1986|p=129}} He read classic novels, travelogues, books on ], and biographies of such figures as ], ], and ].{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=195}} He took to the prison garden for enjoyment and work, at first to do something constructive while afflicted with writer's block.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=312}} He was allowed to build an ambitious garden, transforming what he initially described as a "wilderness"{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=605}} into what the American commander at Spandau described as "Speer's ]".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=654}} | |||
===Release and later life=== | |||
Speer's supporters maintained a continual call for his release. Among those who pledged support for his sentence to be commuted were ],{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=319}} U.S. diplomat ],{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=319}} former U.S. High Commissioner ],{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=440}} and former Nuremberg prosecutor ].{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=440}} ] was a strong advocate of his release,{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=319}} sending flowers to ] on the day of his release{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=448}} and putting an end to the de-Nazification proceedings against him,{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=324}} which could have caused his property to be confiscated.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=299–300}} A reduced sentence required the consent of all four of the occupying powers, and the Soviets adamantly opposed any such proposal.{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=440}} Speer served his full sentence and was released at midnight on October 1, 1966.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=324–25}} | |||
Speer's release from prison was a worldwide media event. Reporters and photographers crowded both the street outside Spandau and the lobby of the ] where Speer spent the night.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=320–321}} He said little, reserving most comments for a major interview published in '']'' in November 1966.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=333–334}} Although he stated he hoped to resume an architectural career, his sole project, a collaboration for a brewery, was unsuccessful.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=327–328}} Instead, he revised his Spandau writings into two autobiographical books, '']'' (in German, ''Erinnerungen'', or ''Reminiscences''{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=5}}) and '']''. He later published a work about Himmler and the SS, which has been published in English as ''The Slave State: Heinrich Himmler's Masterplan for SS Supremacy'' or ''Infiltration: How Heinrich Himmler Schemed to Build an SS Industrial Empire'' (in German, ''Der Sklavenstaat - Meine Auseinandersetzung mit der SS''). Speer was aided in shaping the works by ] and ] from the publishing house ].{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=329–330}} He found himself unable to re-establish a relationship with his children, even with his son ], who had also become an architect. According to Speer's daughter ], "One by one, my sister and brothers gave up. There was no communication."{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=664–665}} He provided financial support for his brother Hermann after the war. However, his other brother Ernst died at the ], despite repeated requests from his parents for Speer to repatriate him.{{sfn|Taylor|2010|p=124}} | |||
Following his release from Spandau, Speer donated the ''Chronicle'', his personal diary, to the ]. It had been edited by Wolters and made no mention of the Jews.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=339–343}} ] discovered discrepancies between the deceptively edited ''Chronicle'' and independent documents. Speer asked Wolters to destroy the material he had omitted from his donation but Wolters refused and retained an original copy.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=226–227}} Wolters' friendship with Speer deteriorated, and one year before Speer's death, Wolters gave Matthias Schmidt access to the unedited ''Chronicle''. Schmidt authored the first book highly critical of Speer.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=359–361}} | |||
=== Release and later life === | |||
]]] | |||
Speer's memoirs were a phenomenal success. The public was fascinated by an inside view of the Third Reich and a major war criminal became a popular figure almost overnight. Importantly, he provided an alibi to older Germans who had been Nazis. If Speer, who had been so close to Hitler, had not known the full extent of the crimes of the Nazi regime and had just been "following orders", then they could tell themselves and others they too had done the same.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=335}} So great was the need to believe this "Speer myth" that Fest and Siedler were able to strengthen it—even in the face of mounting historical evidence to the contrary.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=366}} | |||
Speer's release from prison was a worldwide media event, as reporters and photographers crowded both the street outside Spandau and the lobby of the Berlin hotel where Speer spent his first hours of freedom in over 20 years.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=320–21}} He said little, reserving most comments for a major interview published in '']'' in November 1966 in which he again took personal responsibility for crimes of the Nazi regime.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=333–34}} He abandoned plans to return to architecture, as two proposed partners died shortly before his release.{{sfn|Speer|1976|p=441}} Instead, he revised his Spandau writings into two autobiographical books, and later researched and published a work about Himmler and the SS. His books provide a unique and personal look into the personalities of the Nazi era, most notably ''Inside the Third Reich'' (in German, ''Erinnerungen'', or ''Reminiscences''{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=5}}) and ''Spandau: The Secret Diaries'', and they have become much valued by historians. Speer was aided in shaping the works by ] and ] from the publishing house Ullstein.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=329–30}} He found himself unable to re-establish his relationship with his children, even with his son ] who had also become an architect. According to Speer's daughter ], "One by one my sister and brothers gave up. There was no communication."{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=664–65}} | |||
===Death=== | |||
Following the publication of his bestselling books, Speer donated a considerable amount of money to Jewish charities. According to Siedler, these donations were as high as 80 percent of his royalties. Speer kept the donations anonymous, both for fear of rejection and for fear of being called a hypocrite.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=348}} | |||
]]] | |||
Speer made himself widely available to historians and other enquirers.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=354}} In October 1973, he made his first trip to Britain, flying to London to be interviewed on the ] ''Midweek'' programme.{{sfn|Asher|2003}} In the same year, he appeared on the television programme '']''. Speer returned to London in 1981 to participate in the BBC '']'' programme. He suffered a stroke and died in London on 1 September.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=337}} | |||
He had remained married to his wife, but he had formed a relationship with a German woman living in London and was with her at the time of his death.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=362–363}} His daughter, ], wrote in her 2005 memoirs that after his release from Spandau he spent all of his time constructing the "Speer Myth".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=343}} | |||
Wolters strongly objected to Speer referring to Hitler in the memoirs as a criminal, and Speer predicted as early as 1953 that he would lose a "good many friends" if the writings were published.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=316}} This came to pass following the publication of ''Inside the Third Reich'', as close friends distanced themselves from him, such as Wolters and sculptor ]. Hitler's personal pilot ] suggested that "Speer must have taken leave of his senses."{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=345–46}} Wolters wondered that Speer did not now "walk through life in a ], distributing his fortune among the victims of National Socialism, forswear all the vanities and pleasures of life and ]".{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=328–29}} | |||
==The Speer myth== | |||
Speer made himself widely available to historians and other enquirers.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=354}} He did an extensive, in-depth interview for the June 1971 issue of '']'' magazine, in which he stated, "If I didn't see it, then it was because I didn't want to see it."{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=329}} In October 1973, Speer made his first trip to Britain, flying to London under an assumed name{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=354}} to be interviewed by ] on the ] ''Midweek'' programme.{{sfn|Asher|2003}} Upon arrival, he was detained for almost eight hours at ] when British immigration authorities discovered his true identity. ] ] allowed him into the country for 48 hours.{{sfn|Leigh|1973}} In the same year, he appeared on the television programme '']''. | |||
===The Good Nazi=== | |||
After his release from Spandau, Speer portrayed himself as the "good Nazi".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=327–360}} He was well-educated, middle class, and ], and could contrast himself with those who, in the popular mind, typified "Bad Nazis".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=362}} In his memoirs and interviews, he had distorted the truth and made so many major omissions that his lies became known as "myths".{{sfn|Seelow|2018}} Speer even invented his own birth's circumstances, stating falsely that he was born at midday amid crashes of thunder and bells of the nearby Christ Church, whereas it was between three and five o'clock, and the church was built only some years after.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=14}} Speer took his myth-making to a mass media level and his "cunning apologies" were reproduced frequently in post-war Germany.{{sfn|Seelow|2018}} ] writes in her biography of Speer that Fest and Siedler were co-authors of Speer's memoirs and co-creators of his myths.{{sfn|Trommer|2016|p=80}} In return they were paid handsomely in royalties and other financial inducements.{{sfn|Schwendemann|2016}} Speer, Siedler and Fest had constructed a masterpiece; the image of the "good Nazi" remained in place for decades, despite historical evidence indicating that it was false.{{sfn|Trommer|2016|p=330}} | |||
] | |||
Speer had carefully constructed an image of himself as an ] technocrat who deeply regretted having failed to discover the monstrous crimes of the Third Reich.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=345–346}} This construction was accepted almost at face value by historian ] when investigating the death of Adolf Hitler for ] and in writing ''The Last Days of Hitler''. Trevor-Roper frequently refers to Speer as "a technocrat nourished a technocrat's philosophy", one who cared only for his building projects or his ministerial duties, and who thought that politics was irrelevant, at least until Hitler's ] which Speer, according to his own telling, worked assiduously to counter. Trevor-Roper – who calls Speer an administrative genius whose basic instincts were peaceful and constructive – does take Speer to task, however, for his failure to recognize the immorality of Hitler and Nazism, calling him "the real criminal of Nazi Germany":{{sfn|Trevor-Roper|1995|pp=68–70, 214–215}} | |||
Speer returned to London in 1981 to participate in the BBC '']'' program; while there, he suffered a stroke and died on September 1.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=337}} He had formed a relationship with an Englishwoman of German origin and was with her at the time of his death.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=362–63}} | |||
<blockquote>For ten years he sat at the very centre of political power; his keen intelligence diagnosed the nature and observed the mutations of Nazi government and policy; he saw and despised the personalities around him; he heard their outrageous orders and understood their fantastic ambitions; but he did nothing. Supposing politics to be irrelevant, he turned aside and built roads and bridges and factories, while the logical consequences of government by madmen emerged. Ultimately, when their emergence involved the ruin of all his work, Speer accepted the consequences and acted. Then it was too late; Germany had been destroyed.{{sfn|Trevor-Roper|1995|pp=214–215}}</blockquote> | |||
Even to the end of his life, Speer continued to question his actions under Hitler. He asks in his final book ''Infiltration'', "What would have happened if Hitler had asked me to make decisions that required the utmost hardness? ... How far would I have gone? ... If I had occupied a different position, to what extent would I have ordered atrocities if Hitler had told me to do so?"{{sfn|Speer|1981|pp=12–13}} Speer leaves the questions unanswered.{{sfn|Speer|1981|pp=12–13}} | |||
After Speer's death, ] published a book that demonstrated that Speer had ordered the eviction of Jews from their Berlin homes.{{sfn|Schmidt|1984|p=186}} By 1999, historians had amply demonstrated that Speer had lied extensively.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=360–362}} Even so, public perceptions of Speer did not change substantially until ] aired the biographical film '']'' on television in 2004. The film began a process of demystification and critical reappraisal of Speer.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=335}} ] in his book '']'' said Speer had manoeuvred himself through the ranks of the regime skillfully and ruthlessly and that the idea he was a technocrat blindly carrying out orders was "absurd".{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=553}} Trommer said Speer was not an apolitical technocrat; instead, he was, in reality, one of the most powerful and unscrupulous leaders in the entire Nazi regime.{{sfn|Schwendemann|2016}} Kitchen said Speer had deceived the Nuremberg Tribunal and post-war Germany.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=360–362}} Brechtken said that if Speer's extensive involvement in the Holocaust had been known at the time of his trial he would have been sentenced to death.{{sfn|Reinecke|2017}} | |||
== Legacy and controversy == | |||
The view of Speer as an unpolitical "miracle man" is challenged by Columbia historian ].{{sfn|Tooze|2006|loc=Chapter 17: Albert Speer: 'Miracle Man'}} In his 2006 book, '']'', Tooze, following Gitta Sereny, argues that Speer's ideological commitment to the Nazi cause was greater than he claimed.<ref>{{harvnb|Tooze|2006|p=553}}. ] {{harvnb|Sereny|1995|pp=79–80}}.</ref> Tooze further contends that an insufficiently challenged Speer "mythology"{{efn|name=mythology}} (partly fostered by Speer himself through politically motivated, tendentious use of statistics and other propaganda){{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=555}} had led many historians to assign Speer far more credit for the increases in armaments production than was warranted and give insufficient consideration to the "highly political" function of the so-called armaments miracle.{{efn|name=armaments miracle}} | |||
The image of the "good Nazi" was supported by numerous Speer myths.{{sfn|Seelow|2018}} In addition to the myth that he was an apolitical technocrat, he claimed he did not have full knowledge of ] or the persecution of the Jews. Another myth posits that Speer revolutionized the German war machine after his appointment as Minister of Armaments. He was credited with a dramatic increase in the shipment of arms that was widely reported as keeping Germany in the war.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=552}} Another myth centered around a nonexistent plan to assassinate Hitler with poisonous gas. The idea for this myth came to him after he recalled the panic when car fumes came through an air ventilation system. He fabricated the additional details.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=296–297}} Brechtken wrote that Speer's most brazen lie was fabricated during an interview with a French journalist in 1952. The journalist described an invented scenario in which Speer had refused Hitler's orders and Hitler had left with tears in his eyes. Speer liked the scenario so much that he included it in his memoirs. The journalist had unwittingly collaborated in creating one of his myths.{{sfn|Reinecke|2017}} | |||
=== Architectural legacy === | |||
] built by Speer 1941–1942]] | |||
Little remains of Speer's personal architectural works, other than the plans and photographs. No buildings designed by Speer during the Nazi era are extant in Berlin, other than the '']'' (heavy load bearing body), built around 1941. The {{convert|46|ft|adj=on}} high concrete cylinder was used to measure ground ] as part of feasibility studies for a massive ] and other large structures proposed as part of '']'', Hitler's planned postwar renewal project for the city. The cylinder is now a protected landmark and is open to the public. Along the ], a double row of lampposts designed by Speer still stands.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=75}} The tribune of the ''Zeppelinfeld'' stadium in Nuremberg, though partly demolished, can also be seen.{{sfn|Museen der Stadt Nürnberg}} | |||
Speer also sought to portray himself as an opponent of Hitler's leadership. Despite his opposition to the ], he falsely claimed in his memoirs to have been sympathetic to the plotters. He maintained Hitler was cool towards him for the remainder of his life after learning they had included him on a list of potential ministers. This formed a key element of the myths Speer encouraged.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=205}} Speer also falsely claimed that he had realised the war was lost at an early stage, and thereafter worked to preserve the resources needed for the civilian population's survival.{{sfn|Kershaw|2012|p=289}} In reality, Speer had sought to prolong the war until further resistance was impossible, thus contributing to the large number of deaths and the extensive destruction Germany suffered during the final months of the war.{{sfn|Kershaw|2012|p=289}}{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=653}} | |||
More of Speer's own personal work can be found in London, where he redesigned the interior of the ] to the United Kingdom, then located at 7–9 ]. Since 1967, it has served as the offices of the ]. His work there, stripped of its Nazi fixtures and partially covered by carpets, survives in part.{{sfn|Iconic Photos, ''A Nazi Funeral in London''}} | |||
===Denial of responsibility=== | |||
Another legacy was the ''Arbeitsstab Wiederaufbau zerstörter Städte'' (Working group on Reconstruction of destroyed cities), authorised by Speer in 1943 to rebuild bombed German cities to make them more livable in the age of the automobile.{{sfn|Durth|Gutschow|1988}} Headed by Wolters, the working group took a possible military defeat into their calculations.{{sfn|Durth|Gutschow|1988}} The ''Arbeitsstab'''s recommendations served as the basis of the postwar redevelopment plans in many cities, and ''Arbeitsstab'' members became prominent in the rebuilding.{{sfn|Durth|Gutschow|1988}} | |||
]]] | |||
Speer maintained at the Nuremberg trials and in his memoirs that he had no direct knowledge of the Holocaust. He admitted only to being uncomfortable around Jews in the published version of the ''Spandau Diaries''.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=322}} In his final statement at Nuremberg, Speer gave the impression of apologizing, although he did not directly admit any personal guilt and the only victim he mentioned was the German people.{{sfn|Priemel|2016|p=141}} Historian Martin Kitchen states that Speer was actually "fully aware of what had happened to the Jews" and was "intimately involved in the ']{{'"}}.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|pp=100, 322}} Brechtken said Speer only admitted to a generalized responsibility for the Holocaust to hide his direct and actual responsibility.{{sfn|Seelow|2018}} Speer was photographed with slave laborers at ] during a visit on 31 March 1943; he also visited ]. Although survivor ] testified at the Nuremberg trials about Speer's visit,{{sfn|Pike|2003|page=}} Taylor writes that, had the photo been available, he would have been hanged.{{sfn|Taylor|2010|pp=204–205}} In 2005, '']'' reported that documents had surfaced indicating that Speer had approved the allocation of materials for the expansion of ] after two of his assistants inspected the facility on a day when almost a thousand Jews were massacred.{{sfn|Connolly|2005}} Heinrich Breloer, discussing the construction of Auschwitz, said Speer was not just a cog in the work—he was the "terror itself".{{sfn|Connolly|2005}} | |||
Speer did not deny being present at the ] to Nazi leaders at a conference in Posen (]) on 6 October 1943, but claimed to have left the auditorium before Himmler said during his speech: "The grave decision had to be taken to cause this people to vanish from the earth",{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=167–168}} and later, "The Jews must be exterminated".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=345}} Speer is mentioned several times in the speech, and Himmler addresses him directly.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=345}} In 2007, '']'' reported that a letter from Speer dated 23 December 1971, had been found in a collection of his correspondence with Hélène Jeanty, the widow of a Belgian resistance fighter. In the letter, Speer says, "There is no doubt—I was present as Himmler announced on October 6, 1943, that all Jews would be killed."{{sfn|Connolly|2007}} | |||
=== Actions regarding the Jews === | |||
As General Building Inspector, Speer was responsible for the Central Department for Resettlement.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=116}} From 1939 onward, the Department used the ] to evict Jewish tenants of non-Jewish landlords in Berlin, to make way for non-Jewish tenants displaced by redevelopment or bombing.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=116}} Eventually, 75,000 Jews were displaced by these measures.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=120}} Speer was aware of these activities, and inquired as to their progress.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=119}} At least one original memo from Speer so inquiring still exists,{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=119}} as does the ''Chronicle'' of the Department's activities, kept by Wolters.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=124}} | |||
===Armaments miracle=== | |||
Following his release from Spandau, Speer presented to the ] an edited version of the ''Chronicle'', stripped by Wolters of any mention of the Jews.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=339–43}} When ] discovered discrepancies between the edited ''Chronicle'' and other documents, Wolters explained the situation to Speer, who responded by suggesting to Wolters that the relevant pages of the original ''Chronicle'' should "cease to exist".{{sfn|Sereny|1995|pp=226–27}} Wolters did not destroy the ''Chronicle'', and, as his friendship with Speer deteriorated, allowed access to the original ''Chronicle'' to doctoral student ] (who, after obtaining his doctorate, developed his thesis into a book, ''Albert Speer: The End of a Myth'').{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=359–61}} Speer considered Wolters' actions to be a "betrayal" and a "stab in the back".{{sfn|Fest|2007|p=196}} The original ''Chronicle'' reached the Archives in 1983, after both Speer and Wolters had died.{{sfn|Fest|1999|p=124}} | |||
] in ruins at the end of the war]] | |||
Speer was credited with an "armaments miracle". During the winter of 1941–42, in the light of Germany's disastrous defeat in the ], the German leadership including ], ] and ] had come to the conclusion that the war could not be won.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=554}} The rational position to adopt was to seek a political solution that would end the war without defeat. Speer in response used his propaganda expertise to display a new dynamism of the war economy.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=554}} He produced spectacular statistics, claiming a sixfold increase in munitions production, a fourfold increase in artillery production, and he sent further propaganda to the newsreels of the country. He was able to curtail the discussion that the war should be ended.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=554}} | |||
The armaments "miracle" was a myth; Speer had used statistical manipulation to support his claims.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|p=555}} The production of armaments did rise; however, this was due to the normal causes of reorganization before Speer came to office, the relentless mobilization of slave labor and a deliberate reduction in the quality of output to favor quantity. By July 1943 Speer's armaments propaganda became irrelevant because a catalogue of dramatic defeats on the battlefield meant the prospect of losing the war could no longer be hidden from the German public.{{sfn|Tooze|2006|pp=552–557}} | |||
=== Knowledge of the Holocaust === | |||
] in 1945]] | |||
Speer maintained at Nuremberg and in his memoirs that he had no knowledge of the Holocaust. He later wrote that in mid-1944, he was told by Hanke (by then '']'' of ]) that the minister should never accept an invitation to inspect a concentration camp in neighbouring ], as "he had seen something there which he was not permitted to describe and moreover could not describe".{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=375–76}} Speer later concluded that Hanke must have been speaking of ] and blamed himself for not inquiring further of Hanke or seeking information from Himmler or Hitler: | |||
==Architectural legacy== | |||
{{quote | |||
]'' in 2011]] | |||
| These seconds <nowiki></nowiki> were uppermost in my mind when I stated to the international court at the Nuremberg Trial that, as an important member of the leadership of the Reich, I had to share the total responsibility for all that had happened. For from that moment on I was inescapably contaminated morally; from fear of discovering something which might have made me turn from my course, I had closed my eyes ... Because I failed at that time, I still feel, to this day, responsible for Auschwitz in a wholly personal sense.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=376}} | |||
}} | |||
Little remains of Speer's personal architectural works, other than the plans and photographs. No buildings designed by Speer during the Nazi era are extant in Berlin, other than the four entrance pavilions and underpasses leading to the Victory Column, or ],{{efn|See the official website of Berlin at: https://www.berlin.de/en/attractions-and-sights/3560160-3104052-victory-column.en.html}} and the '']'', a heavy load-bearing body built around 1941. The concrete cylinder, {{convert|46|ft|m|adj=off|order=flip|abbr=}} high, was used to measure ground ] as part of feasibility studies for a massive ] and other large structures planned within Hitler's post-war renewal project for the city of Berlin as the ]. The cylinder is now a protected landmark and is open to the public.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=75}} The ] of the ''Zeppelinfeld'' stadium in Nuremberg, though partly demolished, can also be seen.{{sfn|Museen der Stadt Nürnberg}} | |||
Historian ] indicates that Speer and his team were in charge of building concentration camps and were thus intimately involved in the "Final Solution".{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=100}} He refers to a letter dated 1 February 1943 from Speer to Himmler about concentration camps containing 40,000 Jews or White Russians, suggesting that Speer had greater knowledge of the "Final Solution" than he admitted. When questioned, Speer denied any knowledge of this correspondence although it had gone out under his signature. Speer later insisted that he had tried to save some Jews from camps by using them in the armaments industry. These were "undernourished, overworked slaves", according to Kitchen, who adds that the death rate was "exceedingly high" among such workers.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=157}} | |||
During the war, the Speer-designed ] was largely destroyed by air raids and in the ]. The exterior walls survived, but they were eventually dismantled by the Soviets. Unsubstantiated rumors have claimed that the remains were used for other building projects such as the ], ] and Soviet war memorials in Berlin.{{sfn|Kitchen|2015|p=56}} | |||
Much of the controversy over Speer's knowledge of the Holocaust has centered on his presence at the ] on October 6, 1943, at which Himmler ] detailing the ongoing Holocaust to Nazi leaders. Himmler said, "The grave decision had to be taken to cause this people to vanish from the earth ... In the lands we occupy, the Jewish question will be dealt with by the end of the year."{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|pp=167–68}} Speer is mentioned several times in the speech, and Himmler seems to address him directly.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=168}} In ''Inside the Third Reich'', Speer mentions his own address to the officials (which took place earlier in the day) but does not mention Himmler's speech.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=184–85}}{{sfn|Speer|1970|pp=312–13}} | |||
==See also== | |||
In October 1971, American historian Erich Goldhagen published an article arguing that Speer was present for Himmler's speech.{{sfn|Goldhagen|1976}} According to Fest in his biography of Speer, "Goldhagen's accusation certainly would have been more convincing"{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=185–87}} had he not placed supposed incriminating statements linking Speer with the Holocaust in quotation marks, attributed to Himmler, which were in fact invented by Goldhagen.{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=185–87}} In response, after considerable research in the German Federal Archives in ], Speer said he had left Posen around noon (long before Himmler's speech) to journey to Hitler's headquarters at ].{{sfn|Fest|1999|pp=185–87}} In ''Inside the Third Reich'', published before the Goldhagen article, Speer recalled that on the evening after the conference, many Nazi officials were so drunk that they needed help boarding the special train which was to take them to a meeting with Hitler.{{sfn|Speer|1970|p=313}} One of his biographers, ], suggests this necessarily implies he must have still been present at Posen then and must have heard Himmler's speech.{{sfn|van der Vat|1997|p=169}} In response to Goldhagen's article, Speer had alleged that in writing ''Inside the Third Reich'', he erred in reporting an incident that happened at another conference at Posen a year later, as happening in 1943.{{sfn|Sereny|1995|p=397}} In 2007, '']'' reported that a letter from Speer dated December 23, 1971, had been found in Britain in a collection of his correspondence to Hélène Jeanty, widow of a Belgian resistance fighter. In the letter, Speer states that he had been present for Himmler's presentation in Posen. Speer wrote: "There is no doubt – I was present as Himmler announced on October 6, 1943, that all Jews would be killed."{{sfn|Connolly|2007}} | |||
*'']'' | |||
*'']'', 2004 German film where he was portrayed by actor ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | |||
In 2005, '']'' reported that documents had surfaced indicating that Speer had approved the allocation of materials for the expansion of Auschwitz after two of his assistants toured the facility on a day when almost a thousand Jews were killed. The documents bore annotations in Speer's own handwriting. Speer biographer ] stated that, due to his workload, Speer would not have been personally aware of such activities.{{sfn|Connolly|2005}} | |||
'''Informational notes''' | |||
{{Notelist}} | |||
'''Citations''' | |||
The debate over Speer's knowledge of, or complicity in, the Holocaust made him a symbol for people who were involved with the Nazi regime yet did not have (or claimed not to have had) an active part in the regime's atrocities. As film director ] remarked, " a market for people who said, 'Believe me, I didn't know anything about . Just look at the ''Führer''{{'}}s friend, he didn't know about it either.{{'"}}{{sfn|Connolly|2005}} | |||
== See also == | |||
{{Portal|Architecture|World War II}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== References == | |||
=== Explanatory notes === | |||
{{notes | |||
| notes = | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = reappointment | |||
| Although dismissed by Hitler, Speer was immediately re-appointed in the ] as Minister of Economics. | |||
}} | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = The Nazi Who Said Sorry | |||
| The title of a BBC2 documentary, {{harvnb|''The Nazi Who Said Sorry''}}. | |||
}} | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = Freunde | |||
| {{harvnb|Fest|1999|p=296}}. "Wenn Hitler überhaupt Freunde gehabt hätte, wäre ich bestimmt einer seiner engen Freunde gewesen." | |||
}} | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = Diary Nov, 20, 1949 | |||
| {{harvnb|Speer|1975|p=217}}. Diary entry made on Nov, 20, 1949. | |||
}} | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = mythology | |||
| {{harvnb|Tooze|2006|p=577}}. "The simple story spun by Speer, that the German war economy up to 1941 was an inefficient sink for labour and raw materials and that it was only after December 1941, by means of the Fuehrer's decree and Speer's inspired leadership, that it was awakened to the need for efficiency, is clearly a myth the statistics usually invoked to support this description of the pre-Speer era simply do not stand up to detailed scrutiny." | |||
}} | |||
{{efn | |||
| name = armaments miracle | |||
| {{harvnb|Tooze|2006|p=556}}. "iven the highly political function of the 'armaments miracle' the historical record of the Speer Ministry must be approached with a very wary eye. Too many historians have been far too uncritical in the acceptance of Speer's rhetoric of rationalization, efficiency and productivism. . . . And this critique is more than mere nit-picking. It goes to the very heart of Speer's ideological vision of the war economy, as a limitless flow of output released by energetic leadership and technological genius." | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
=== Citations === | |||
{{reflist|20em}} | {{reflist|20em}} | ||
'''Bibliography''' | |||
:'''Printed sources''' | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Boog |first1=Horst |last2=Krebs |first2=Gerhard |last3=Vogel |first3=Detlef |author-link1=Horst Boog |author-link3=Detlef Vogel | year= 2006 | title=Germany and the Second World War: Volume VII: The Strategic Air War in Europe and the War in the West and East Asia, 1943–1944/5|location=London| publisher=Clarendon Press| isbn=978-0198228899 | title-link=Germany and the Second World War }} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = |
| last = Brechtken | ||
| first = |
| first = Magnus | ||
| year = |
| year = 2017 | ||
| title = Albert Speer: Eine deutsche Karriere | |||
| title = For Fuhrer and Fatherland: Political and Civil Awards of the Third Reich | |||
| author-link = Magnus Brechtken | |||
| publisher = R. James Bender Publishing | |||
| |
| place = Germany | ||
| publisher = Siedler Verlag | |||
| isbn = 978-3827500403 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation|last=Buggeln|first=Marc|title=Slave Labor in Nazi Concentration Camps|year=2014|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0198707974}} | |||
* {{cite book | last=Boog | first=Horst |authorlink1=Horst Boog |author2=Krebs, Gerhard |author3=Vogel, Detlef |authorlink3=Detlef Vogel | year= 2006 | title=]: Volume VII: The Strategic Air War in Europe and the War in the West and East Asia, 1943–1944/5|location=London| publisher=Clarendon Press| isbn=978-0198228899 | ref = {{harvid|Boog et al|2006}} }} | |||
* {{citation | |||
* {{cite book|last=Buggeln|first=Marc|title=Slave Labor in Nazi Concentration Camps|year=2014|publisher=]|isbn=9780198707974|ref=harv}} | |||
| last= Carroll | |||
| first= Berenice Anita | |||
| year= 2018 | |||
| title= Design for Total War: Arms and Economics in the Third Reich | |||
| publisher= Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. | |||
| isbn= 978-3111359588}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Conot | | last = Conot | ||
Line 320: | Line 274: | ||
| publisher = Harper & Row | | publisher = Harper & Row | ||
| isbn = 978-0-88184-032-2 | | isbn = 978-0-88184-032-2 | ||
| url = https://archive.org/details/justiceatnurembe00cono | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{cite book |last=Evans |first=Richard J. |author-link=Richard J. Evans |date=1997 |title=Rereading German History: From Unification to Reunification 1800-1996 |location=London |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-41-515899-2}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
| title = Träume in Trümmern, ("Dreams in ruins") | |||
| year = 1988 | |||
| last1 = Durth | |||
| last2 = Gutschow | |||
| first1 = Werner | |||
| first2 = Niels | |||
| publisher = Vieweg Friedr. + Sohn Ver | |||
| isbn = 978-3-528-08706-7 | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Fest | | last = Fest | ||
| first = Joachim | | first = Joachim | ||
| |
| author-link = Joachim Fest | ||
| others = translated by Ewald Osers and Alexandra Dring | | others = translated by Ewald Osers and Alexandra Dring | ||
| year = 1999 | | year = 1999 | ||
Line 340: | Line 286: | ||
| publisher = Harcourt | | publisher = Harcourt | ||
| isbn = 978-0-15-100556-7 | | isbn = 978-0-15-100556-7 | ||
| url = https://archive.org/details/speerfinalverdic00fest | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | last=Hamsher | first=William |title=Albert Speer-Victim of Nuremberg? |date=1970 |publisher=Leslie Frewin Publishers Ltd |isbn=978-0091015107}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jaskot | first=Paul B. | title=The Architecture of Oppression: The SS, Forced Labor and the Nazi Monumental Building Economy |publisher=Taylor & Francis |location=London and New York |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-13459-462-7}} | |||
| last = Fest | |||
* {{citation |last1=Kershaw |first1=Ian |author-link1=Ian Kershaw |title=The End: Hitler's Germany, 1944–45 |date=2012 |publisher=Penguin Books |location=London |isbn=978-0-141-01421-0}} | |||
| first = Joachim | |||
| authorlink = Joachim Fest | |||
| others = translated by Patrick Camiller | |||
| year = 2007 | |||
| title = Albert Speer: Conversations with Hitler's Architect | |||
| publisher = Polity Press | |||
| isbn = 978-0-7456-3918-5 | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Fishman | |||
| first = Jack | |||
| year = 1986 | |||
| title = Long Knives and Short Memories: The Spandau Prison Story | |||
| publisher = Breakwater Books | |||
| isbn = 0-920911-00-5 | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| first = Henry T. | | first = Henry T. | ||
| last = King | | last = King | ||
| |
| author-link = Henry T. King | ||
| year = 1997 | | year = 1997 | ||
| title = The Two Worlds of Albert Speer: Reflections of a Nuremberg Prosecutor | | title = The Two Worlds of Albert Speer: Reflections of a Nuremberg Prosecutor | ||
Line 368: | Line 300: | ||
| isbn = 978-0-7618-0872-5 | | isbn = 978-0-7618-0872-5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{ |
* {{citation | ||
| last = Kitchen | | last = Kitchen | ||
| first =Martin | | first =Martin | ||
| |
| author-link = Martin Kitchen | ||
| year = 2015 | | year = 2015 | ||
| title = Speer: Hitler's Architect | | title = Speer: Hitler's Architect | ||
| publisher = Yale University Press | | publisher = Yale University Press | ||
| isbn = 978-0-300-19044-1 | | isbn = 978-0-300-19044-1 | ||
| title-link =Speer: Hitler's Architect | |||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Lilla |first=Joachim |title=Der Preußische Staatsrat 1921–1933: Ein biographisches Handbuch |publisher=Droste Verlag |location=Düsseldorf |year=2005 |isbn=978-3-770-05271-4}} | |||
* {{citation |author1=Office of United States Chief of Counsel For Prosecution of Axis Criminality |title=Document 3568-PS |journal=Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression |date=1946 |volume=VI |publisher=United States Government Printing Office |location=Washington |ref={{harvid|Nazi conspiracy and aggression|1946}}}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| |
| last1=Overy | ||
| |
| first1=Richard | ||
| |
| author-link = Richard Overy | ||
| title = Delay, then Albert Speer is allowed in | |||
| work = The Times | |||
| location = UK | |||
| url = http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/185/973/13016515w16/purl=rc1_TTDA_0_CS67729752&dyn=25!xrn_41_0_CS67729752&hst_1?sw_aep=oxfshlib | |||
| accessdate = December 17, 2008 | |||
}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
| last = Overy | |||
| first = | |||
| authorlink = Richard Overy | |||
| title = War and Economy in the Third Reich | | title = War and Economy in the Third Reich | ||
| year = 2002 | | year = 2002 | ||
| |
| orig-year = 1995 | ||
| publisher = Clarendon Press | | publisher = Clarendon Press | ||
| location = Oxford | | location = Oxford | ||
| isbn = 0-19-820599- |
| isbn = 978-0-19-820599-9 | ||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation |last1=Pike |first1=David Wingeate |title=Spaniards in the Holocaust: Mauthausen, Horror on the Danube |date=2003 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-134-58713-1 |language=en}} | |||
*{{citation |last1=Priemel |first1=Kim Christian |author1-link=Kim Christian Priemel |title=The Betrayal: The Nuremberg Trials and German Divergence |date=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-256374-3 |language=en}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Schmidt | | last = Schmidt | ||
Line 405: | Line 330: | ||
| year = 1984 | | year = 1984 | ||
| title = Albert Speer: The End of a Myth | | title = Albert Speer: The End of a Myth | ||
| publisher = St |
| publisher = St. Martin's Press | ||
| isbn = 978-0-312-01709-5 | | isbn = 978-0-312-01709-5 | ||
| url = https://archive.org/details/albertspeerendof00schm | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{ |
* {{citation | ||
| last = Schubert | | last = Schubert | ||
| first = Philipp | | first = Philipp | ||
Line 416: | Line 342: | ||
| location = Munich | | location = Munich | ||
| isbn = 978-3-638-59047-1 | | isbn = 978-3-638-59047-1 | ||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Sereny | | last = Sereny | ||
| first = Gitta | | first = Gitta | ||
| |
| author-link = Gitta Sereny | ||
| year = 1995 | | year = 1995 | ||
| title = Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth | | title = Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth | ||
| publisher = Knopf | | publisher = Knopf | ||
| isbn = 978-0-394-52915-8 | | isbn = 978-0-394-52915-8 | ||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| |
|last= Speer | ||
| |
|first= Albert | ||
|title= Inside the Third Reich | |||
| authorlink = William L. Shirer | |||
|publisher= Avon Books | |||
| year = 1960 | |||
|year= 1970 | |||
| title = ] | |||
|location= New York | |||
| publisher = Simon and Schuster | |||
|isbn= 978-0380000715 | |||
| place = New York | |||
}} | |||
| lccn = 60-6729 | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = |
| last = Taylor | ||
| first = |
| first = Blaine | ||
| year = |
| year = 2010 | ||
| title = |
| title = Hitler's Engineers: Fritz Todt and Albert Speer – Master Builders of the Third Reich | ||
| others = Translated by ] | | others = Translated by ] | ||
| publisher = |
| publisher = Casemate Publishers | ||
| location = |
| location = Havertown, PA and Newbury, England | ||
| isbn = 978- |
| isbn = 978-1-932033-68-7 | ||
| lccn = 70119132 | |||
}}. Republished in paperback in 1997 by Simon & Schuster, {{ISBN|978-0-684-82949-4}} | |||
: (Original German edition: {{cite book | |||
| last = Speer | |||
| first = Albert | |||
| year = 1969 | |||
| title = Erinnerungen | |||
| publisher = Propyläen/Ullstein Verlag | |||
| location = Berlin and Frankfurt am Main | |||
| oclc = 639475 | |||
}}) | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Speer | |||
| first = Albert | |||
| year = 1976 | |||
| title = ] | |||
| others = Translated by ] | |||
| publisher = Macmillan | |||
| location = New York and Toronto | |||
| isbn = 978-0-02-612810-0 | |||
}} | |||
: (Original German edition: {{citation | |||
| last = Speer | |||
| first = Albert | |||
| year = 1975 | |||
| title = Spandauer Tagebücher | |||
| trans-title = Spandau Diaries | |||
| publisher = Propyläen/Ullstein Verlag | |||
| location = Berlin and Frankfurt am Main | |||
| oclc = 185306869 | |||
| isbn = 978-3-549-17316-9 | |||
}}) | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Speer | |||
| first = Albert | |||
| year = 1981 | |||
| title = Infiltration: How Heinrich Himmler Schemed to Build an SS Industrial Empire | |||
| publisher = Macmillan | |||
| isbn = 978-0-02-612800-1 | |||
}} | }} | ||
: (Original German edition: {{citation | |||
| last = Speer | |||
| first = Albert | |||
| year = 1981 | |||
| title = Der Sklavenstaat: meine Auseinandersetzungen mit der SS | |||
| trans-title = The Slave State: My Battles with the SS | |||
| publisher = Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt | |||
| oclc = 7610230 | |||
| isbn = 978-3-421-06059-4 | |||
}}) | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Tooze | | last = Tooze | ||
| first = Adam | | first = Adam | ||
| year = 2006 | | year = 2006 | ||
| title = The Wages of Destruction |
| title = The Wages of Destruction | ||
| author-link = Adam Tooze | |||
| location = London | | location = London | ||
| publisher = Allen Lane | | publisher = Allen Lane | ||
| isbn = 978-0-7139-9566-4 | | isbn = 978-0-7139-9566-4 | ||
| title-link = The Wages of Destruction | |||
}} | |||
*{{ citation | |||
| author-link = Hugh Trevor-Roper | |||
| last = Trevor-Roper | |||
| first = Hugh | |||
| year = 1995 | |||
| orig-year = 1947 | |||
| title = The Last Days of Hitler | |||
| edition = seventh | |||
| location = London | |||
| publisher = Pan Books | |||
| isbn = 978-1-4472-1861-6 | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Trommer | |||
| first = Isabell | |||
| year = 2016 | |||
| title = Rechtfertigung und Entlastung: Albert Speer in der Bundesrepublik | |||
| publisher = Campus Verlag GmbH | |||
| isbn = 978-3593505299 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{ |
* {{citation|last= Uziel|first=Daniel | author-link = Daniel Uziel | title=Arming the Luftwaffe: The German Aviation Industry in World War II|year=2012|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-6521-7}} | ||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| first = Dan | | first = Dan | ||
| last = van der Vat | | last = van der Vat | ||
| |
| author-link = Dan van der Vat | ||
| year = 1997 | | year = 1997 | ||
| title = The Good Nazi: The Life and Lies of Albert Speer | | title = The Good Nazi: The Life and Lies of Albert Speer | ||
Line 515: | Line 412: | ||
| isbn = 978-0-297-81721-5 | | isbn = 978-0-297-81721-5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | |||
| last= Wistrich | |||
| first= Robert | |||
| author-link = Robert Wistrich | |||
| title= Who's Who in Nazi Germany | |||
| publisher= Macmillan Publishing Co. | |||
| year= 1982 | |||
| isbn= 0-02-630600-X | |||
}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
:'''Online sources''' | |||
{{refbegin|40em}} | |||
* {{cite news | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Asher | | last = Asher | ||
| first = Edgar | | first = Edgar | ||
| title = The day I met Hitler's Architect | | title = The day I met Hitler's Architect | ||
| work = ] | | work = ] | ||
| date = |
| date = 21 November 2003 | ||
| pages = 7, 9 | |||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Connolly | | last = Connolly | ||
| first = Kate | | first = Kate | ||
| date = |
| date = 11 May 2005 | ||
| title = Wartime reports debunk Speer as the good Nazi | |||
| work = The Daily Telegraph | | work = ] | ||
| location = UK | | location = UK | ||
| url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/1489793/Wartime-reports-debunk-Speer-as-the-Good-Nazi.html | | url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/1489793/Wartime-reports-debunk-Speer-as-the-Good-Nazi.html | ||
| |
| access-date = 11 January 2014 | ||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Connolly | | last = Connolly | ||
| first = Kate | | first = Kate | ||
| date = |
| date = 13 March 2007 | ||
| title = Letter proves Speer knew of Holocaust plan | |||
| work = ] | | work = ] | ||
| publisher = Guardian News and Media | |||
| url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/13/secondworldwar.kateconnolly | | url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/13/secondworldwar.kateconnolly | ||
| |
| access-date = 7 May 2017 | ||
}} | |||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | |||
* {{cite news | |||
| last = Goldhagen | |||
| first = Erich | |||
| title = Speer Accused | |||
| work = ] | |||
| date = March 1, 1976 | |||
| url = http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1976/3/1/speer-accused-pto-the-editors-of/ | |||
| accessdate = May 7, 2017 | |||
| ref = harv | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Reinecke | |||
| title = A Nazi Funeral in London | |||
| |
| first = Stefan | ||
| |
| date = 22 June 2017 | ||
| title = Historiker über Albert Speer: "Er tat alles für den Endsieg" | |||
| work = iconicphotos.wordpress.com | |||
| newspaper = Die Tageszeitung: Taz | |||
| url = http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/a-nazi-funeral-in-london/ | |||
| location = Germany | |||
| accessdate = January 8, 2012 | |||
| url = https://www.taz.de/!5418482/ | |||
| ref = {{sfnRef|Iconic Photos, ''A Nazi Funeral in London''}} | |||
| access-date = 22 June 2017 | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
| title = Albert Speer: The Nazi Who Said Sorry | |||
| year = 1996 | |||
| publisher = British Film Institute | |||
| work = ftvdb.bfi.org.uk | |||
| url = http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/548364 | |||
| accessdate = January 8, 2012 | |||
| ref = {{sfnRef|''The Nazi Who Said Sorry''}} | |||
}} | |||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Schwendemann | |||
|title = The Paris World Exposition 1937: Monuments to dictatorship – the German and Soviet Pavilions | |||
| first = Heinrich | |||
|publisher = Website of ], Hanover | |||
| date = 30 November 2016 | |||
|work = expo2000.de | |||
| title = Rechtfertigung und Entlastung. Albert Speer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland | |||
|url = http://www.expo2000.de/expo2000/geschichte/detail.php?wa_id=13&lang=1&s_typ=28&imag=3 | |||
| work = Rezensiert für H-Soz-Kult von | |||
|accessdate = January 8, 2012 | |||
| location = Germany | |||
|ref = {{sfnRef|Paris World Exposition 1937}} | |||
| isbn = 9783593505299 | |||
|deadurl = yes | |||
| url = https://www.hsozkult.de/publicationreview/id/rezbuecher-25978 | |||
|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120301165911/http://www.expo2000.de/expo2000/geschichte/detail.php?wa_id=13&lang=1&s_typ=28&imag=3 | |||
| access-date = 12 April 2019 | |||
|archivedate = March 1, 2012 | |||
|df = mdy-all | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
| last = Seelow | |||
| title = Speer cross-examination | |||
| first = A. | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| |
| date = 2018 | ||
| title = Demystifying Hitler's Favorite Architect. Review of: Magnus Brechtken, Albert Speer. Eine deutsche Karriere | |||
| url = http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Speer.html | |||
| journal = Architectural Histories | |||
| accessdate = January 8, 2012 | |||
| volume = 6 | |||
| ref = {{sfnRef|Speer cross-examination}} | |||
| number = 1 | |||
| pages = 1–11 | |||
| doi = 10.5334/ah.334 | |||
| doi-access = free | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{citation | * {{citation | ||
Line 599: | Line 489: | ||
| publisher = Museen der Stadt Nürnberg | | publisher = Museen der Stadt Nürnberg | ||
| url = http://www.memorium-nuremberg.de | | url = http://www.memorium-nuremberg.de | ||
| |
| access-date = 5 November 2014 | ||
| ref = {{sfnRef|Museen der Stadt Nürnberg}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{cite book | author=U.S. Government | year=1950 | title=Trials of the War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals | volume=II: The Milch Case | publisher=United States Printing Office | url=https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-II.pdf| access-date = 27 June 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210610120426/https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-II.pdf | archive-date = 10 June 2021}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
{{refend}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{citation|last=Causey|first=Charles M.|year=2016|title=The Lion and the Lamb: The True Holocaust Story of a Powerful Nazi Leader and a Dutch Resistance Worker|publisher=Westbow Press |isbn=978-1-51276-109-2}} | |||
* {{citation | |||
| last = Krier | | last = Krier | ||
| first = Léon | | first = Léon | ||
| |
| author-link = Léon Krier | ||
| year = 1985 | | year = 1985 | ||
| title = Albert Speer: Architecture, 1932–1942 | | title = Albert Speer's life: Architecture, 1932–1942 | ||
| publisher = Archives D'Architecture Moderne | | publisher = Archives D'Architecture Moderne | ||
| isbn = 2-87143-006-3 | | isbn = 978-2-87143-006-3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
*{{citation |last1=Schroeter |first1=Wolfgang |title=Albert Speer: Aufstieg und Fall eines Mythos |date=2018 |publisher=Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh |isbn=978-3-657-78913-9 |language=de}} | |||
== |
==External links== | ||
{{Commons category |
{{Commons category}} | ||
{{ |
{{Wikiquote}} | ||
* {{cite web | url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/audiointerviews/profilepages/speera1.shtml | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20030220022054/http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/audiointerviews/profilepages/speera1.shtml | title = BBC Four – Audio Interviews | date = December 29, 1979 | archivedate=February 20, 2003}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite web | url = http://www.speer-und-er.de/ | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20050323040614/http://www.wdr.de/tv/speer_und_er/index.phtml | title = Speer und Er | language = German | archivedate=March 23, 2005}} | |||
* : affidavit, sworn and signed at Munich on June 15, 1977, translated from the German original. | |||
* | |||
* {{PM20|FID=pe/016838}} | * {{PM20|FID=pe/016838}} | ||
* {{citation | title = Speer cross-examination | publisher = University of Missouri–Kansas City | work = law2.umkc.edu | url = http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Speer.html | access-date = 8 January 2012}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Navboxes | {{Navboxes | ||
Line 628: | Line 521: | ||
|state=collapsed | |state=collapsed | ||
|list1= | |list1= | ||
{{Albert Speer}} | |||
{{Hitler's Cabinet}} | {{Hitler's Cabinet}} | ||
{{NSDAP}} | {{NSDAP}} | ||
Line 641: | Line 535: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 17:23, 25 December 2024
German architect (1905–1981) For other uses, see Albert Speer (disambiguation).
Albert Speer | |
---|---|
Speer in 1933 | |
Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production | |
In office 8 February 1942 – 30 April 1945 | |
Führer | Adolf Hitler |
Preceded by | Fritz Todt (as Minister of Armaments and Munitions) |
Succeeded by | Karl Saur (as Minister of Munitions) |
Reich Minister of Industry and Production | |
In office 5 May 1945 – 23 May 1945 | |
Head of state | Karl Dönitz |
Head of government | Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk |
Preceded by | Position established |
Succeeded by | Position abolished |
Inspector General of German Roadways | |
In office 8 February 1942 – 23 May 1945 | |
Preceded by | Fritz Todt |
Succeeded by | Position abolished |
Inspector General for Water and Energy | |
In office 8 February 1942 – 23 May 1945 | |
Preceded by | Fritz Todt |
Succeeded by | Position abolished |
Head of Organization Todt | |
In office 8 February 1942 – 14 April 1944 | |
Preceded by | Fritz Todt |
Succeeded by | Franz Xaver Dorsch |
General Building Inspector for the Reich Capital | |
In office 30 January 1937 – 23 May 1945 | |
Preceded by | Position created |
Succeeded by | Position abolished |
Personal details | |
Born | Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer (1905-03-19)19 March 1905 Mannheim, Grand Duchy of Baden, German Empire |
Died | 1 September 1981(1981-09-01) (aged 76) London, England |
Political party | Nazi Party (1931–1945) |
Education | Technische Universität Berlin Technical University of Munich University of Karlsruhe |
Profession | Architect, government official, author |
Cabinet | Hitler cabinet Schwerin von Krosigk cabinet |
Signature | |
Criminal conviction | |
Conviction(s) | War crimes Crimes against humanity |
Trial | Nuremberg trials |
Criminal penalty | 20 years imprisonment |
Details | |
Target(s) | Millions of slave laborers; Soviet prisoners of war and others |
Imprisoned at | Spandau Prison |
Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer (/ʃpɛər/; German: [ˈʃpeːɐ̯] ; 19 March 1905 – 1 September 1981) was a German architect who served as the Minister of Armaments and War Production in Nazi Germany during most of World War II. A close ally of Adolf Hitler, he was convicted at the Nuremberg trials and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
An architect by training, Speer joined the Nazi Party in 1931. His architectural skills made him increasingly prominent within the Party, and he became a member of Hitler's inner circle. Hitler commissioned him to design and construct structures, including the Reich Chancellery and the Nazi Party rally grounds in Nuremberg. In 1937, Hitler appointed Speer as General Building Inspector for Berlin. In this capacity he was responsible for the Central Department for Resettlement that evicted Jewish tenants from their homes in Berlin. In February 1942, Speer was appointed as Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production. Using misleading statistics, he promoted himself as having performed an armaments miracle that was widely credited with keeping Germany in the war. In 1944, Speer established a task force to increase production of fighter aircraft. It became instrumental in exploiting slave labor for the benefit of the German war effort.
After the war, Albert Speer was among the 24 "major war criminals" charged by the International Military Tribunal for Nazi atrocities. He was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, principally for the use of slave labor, narrowly avoiding a death sentence. Having served his full term, Speer was released in 1966. He used his writings from the time of imprisonment as the basis for two autobiographical books, Inside the Third Reich and Spandau: The Secret Diaries. Speer's books were a success; the public was fascinated by the inside view of the Third Reich he provided. He died of a stroke in 1981.
Through his autobiographies and interviews, Speer carefully constructed an image of himself as a man who deeply regretted having failed to discover the crimes of the Third Reich. He continued to deny explicit knowledge of, and responsibility for, the Holocaust. This image dominated his historiography in the decades following the war, giving rise to the "Speer myth": the perception of him as an apolitical technocrat responsible for revolutionizing the German war machine. The myth began to fall apart in the 1980s, when the armaments miracle was attributed to Nazi propaganda. Twenty-five years after Speer's death, Adam Tooze wrote in The Wages of Destruction that the idea that Speer was an apolitical technocrat was "absurd". Martin Kitchen, writing in Speer: Hitler's Architect, stated that much of the increase in Germany's arms production was actually due to systems instituted by Speer's predecessor (Fritz Todt) and that Speer was intimately aware of and involved in the "Final Solution"; evidence of which has been conclusively shown in the decades following the Nuremberg trials.
Early years and personal life
Speer was born in Mannheim, into an upper-middle-class family. He was the second of three sons of Luise Máthilde Wilhelmine (Hommel) and Albert Friedrich Speer. In 1918, the family leased their Mannheim residence and moved to a home they had in Heidelberg. Henry T. King, deputy prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials who later wrote a book about Speer said, "Love and warmth were lacking in the household of Speer's youth." His brothers, Ernst and Hermann, bullied him throughout his childhood. Speer was active in sports, taking up skiing and mountaineering. He followed in the footsteps of his father and grandfather and studied architecture.
Speer began his architectural studies at the University of Karlsruhe instead of a more highly acclaimed institution because the hyperinflation crisis of 1923 limited his parents' income. In 1924, when the crisis had abated, he transferred to the "much more reputable" Technische Hochschule München (now Technical University of Munich). In 1925, he transferred again, this time to the Technische Hochschule Berlin-Chalottenburg (now Technische Universität Berlin) where he studied under Heinrich Tessenow, whom Speer greatly admired. After passing his exams in 1927, Speer became Tessenow's assistant, a high honor for a man of 22. As such, Speer taught some of his classes while continuing his own postgraduate studies. In Munich Speer began a close friendship, ultimately spanning over 50 years, with Rudolf Wolters, who also studied under Tessenow.
In mid-1922, Speer began courting Margarete (Margret) Weber (1905–1987), the daughter of a successful craftsman who employed 50 workers. The relationship was frowned upon by Speer's class-conscious mother, who felt the Webers were socially inferior. Despite this opposition, the two married in Berlin on 28 August 1928; seven years elapsed before Margarete was invited to stay at her in-laws' home. The couple would have six children together, but Albert Speer grew increasingly distant from his family after 1933. He remained so even after his release from imprisonment in 1966, despite their efforts to forge closer bonds.
Party architect and government functionary
Joining the Nazis (1931–1934)
In January 1931, Speer applied for Nazi Party membership, and on 1 March 1931, he became member number 474,481. The same year, with stipends shrinking amid the Depression, Speer surrendered his position as Tessenow's assistant and moved to Mannheim, hoping to make a living as an architect. After he failed to do so, his father gave him a part-time job as manager of his properties. In July 1932, the Speers visited Berlin to help out the Party before the Reichstag elections. While they were there his friend, Nazi Party official Karl Hanke recommended the young architect to Joseph Goebbels to help renovate the Party's Berlin headquarters. When the commission was completed, Speer returned to Mannheim and remained there as Hitler took office in January 1933.
The organizers of the 1933 Nuremberg Rally asked Speer to submit designs for the rally, bringing him into contact with Hitler for the first time. Neither the organizers nor Rudolf Hess were willing to decide whether to approve the plans, and Hess sent Speer to Hitler's Munich apartment to seek his approval. This work won Speer his first national post, as Nazi Party "Commissioner for the Artistic and Technical Presentation of Party Rallies and Demonstrations".
Shortly after Hitler came into power, he began to make plans to rebuild the chancellery. At the end of 1933, he contracted Paul Troost to renovate the entire building. Hitler appointed Speer, whose work for Goebbels had impressed him, to manage the building site for Troost. As Chancellor, Hitler had a residence in the building and came by every day to be briefed by Speer and the building supervisor on the progress of the renovations. After one of these briefings, Hitler invited Speer to lunch, to the architect's great excitement. Speer quickly became part of Hitler's inner circle; he was expected to call on him in the morning for a walk or chat, to provide consultation on architectural matters, and to discuss Hitler's ideas. Most days he was invited to dinner.
In the English version of his memoirs, Speer says that his political commitment merely consisted of paying his "monthly dues". He assumed his German readers would not be so gullible and told them the Nazi Party offered a "new mission". He was more forthright in an interview with William Hamsher in which he said he joined the party in order to save "Germany from Communism". After the war, he claimed to have had little interest in politics at all and had joined almost by chance. Like many of those in power in the Third Reich, he was not an ideologue, "nor was he anything more than an instinctive anti-Semite." Historian Magnus Brechtken, discussing Speer, said he did not give anti-Jewish public speeches and that his anti-Semitism can best be understood through his actions—which were anti-Semitic. Brechtken added that, throughout Speer's life, his central motives were to gain power, rule, and acquire wealth.
Nazi architect (1934–1937)
Main article: Nazi architectureWhen Troost died on 21 January 1934, Speer effectively replaced him as the Party's chief architect. Hitler appointed Speer as head of the Chief Office for Construction, which placed him nominally on Hess' staff.
One of Speer's first commissions after Troost's death was the Zeppelinfeld stadium in Nuremberg. It was used for Nazi propaganda rallies and can be seen in Leni Riefenstahl's propaganda film Triumph of the Will. The building was able to hold 340,000 people. Speer insisted that as many events as possible be held at night, both to give greater prominence to his lighting effects and to hide the overweight Nazis. Nuremberg was the site of many official Nazi buildings. Many more buildings were planned. If built, the German Stadium in Nuremberg would have accommodated 400,000 spectators. Speer modified Werner March's design for the Olympic Stadium being built for the 1936 Summer Olympics. He added a stone exterior that pleased Hitler. Speer designed the German Pavilion for the 1937 international exposition in Paris.
Berlin's General Building Inspector (1937–1942)
On 30 January 1937, Hitler appointed Speer as General Building Inspector for the Reich Capital. This carried with it the rank of State Secretary in the Reich government and gave him extraordinary powers over the Berlin city government. He was to report directly to Hitler, and was independent of both the mayor and the Gauleiter of Berlin. Hitler ordered Speer to develop plans to rebuild Berlin. These centered on a three-mile-long grand boulevard running from north to south, which Speer called the Prachtstrasse, or Street of Magnificence; he also referred to it as the "North–South Axis". At the northern end of the boulevard, Speer planned to build the Volkshalle, a huge domed assembly hall over 700 feet (210 m) high, with floor space for 180,000 people. At the southern end of the avenue, a great triumphal arch, almost 400 feet (120 m) high and able to fit the Arc de Triomphe inside its opening, was planned. The existing Berlin railroad termini were to be dismantled, and two large new stations built. Speer hired Wolters as part of his design team, with special responsibility for the Prachtstrasse. The outbreak of World War II in 1939 led to the postponement, and later the abandonment, of these plans, which, after Nazi capitulation, Speer himself considered as “awful”.
Plans to build a new Reich Chancellery had been underway since 1934. Land had been purchased by the end of 1934 and starting in March 1936 the first buildings were demolished to create space at Voßstraße. Speer was involved virtually from the beginning. In the aftermath of the Night of the Long Knives, he had been commissioned to renovate the Borsig Palace on the corner of Voßstraße and Wilhelmstraße as headquarters of the Sturmabteilung (SA). He completed the preliminary work for the new chancellery by May 1936. In June 1936 he charged a personal honorarium of 30,000 Reichsmark and estimated the chancellery would be completed within three to four years. Detailed plans were completed in July 1937 and the first shell of the new chancellery was complete on 1 January 1938. On 27 January 1938, Speer received plenipotentiary powers from Hitler to finish the new chancellery by 1 January 1939. For propaganda Hitler claimed during the topping-out ceremony on 2 August 1938, that he had ordered Speer to complete the new chancellery that year. Shortages of labor meant the construction workers had to work in ten-to-twelve-hour shifts. The SS built two concentration camps in 1938 and used the inmates to quarry stone for its construction. A brick factory was built near the Oranienburg concentration camp at Speer's behest; when someone commented on the poor conditions there, Speer stated, "The Yids got used to making bricks while in Egyptian captivity". The chancellery was completed in early January 1939. The building itself was hailed by Hitler as the "crowning glory of the greater German political empire".
During the Chancellery project, the pogrom of Kristallnacht took place. Speer made no mention of it in the first draft of Inside the Third Reich. It was only on the urgent advice of his publisher that he added a mention of seeing the ruins of the Central Synagogue in Berlin from his car. Kristallnacht accelerated Speer's ongoing efforts to dispossess Berlin's Jews from their homes. From 1939 on, Speer's Department used the Nuremberg Laws to evict Jewish tenants of non-Jewish landlords in Berlin, to make way for non-Jewish tenants displaced by redevelopment or bombing. Eventually, 75,000 Jews were displaced by these measures. Speer denied he knew they were being put on Holocaust trains and claimed that those displaced were, "Completely free and their families were still in their apartments". He also said: " ... en route to my ministry on the city highway, I could see ... crowds of people on the platform of nearby Nikolassee Railroad Station. I knew that these must be Berlin Jews who were being evacuated. I am sure that an oppressive feeling struck me as I drove past. I presumably had a sense of somber events." Matthias Schmidt said Speer had personally inspected concentration camps and described his comments as an "outright farce". Martin Kitchen described Speer's often repeated line that he knew nothing of the "dreadful things" as hollow—not only was he fully aware of the fate of the Jews, he actively participated in their persecution.
As Germany started World War II in Europe, Speer instituted quick-reaction squads to construct roads or clear away debris; before long, these units would be used to clear bomb sites. Speer used forced Jewish labor on these projects, in addition to regular German workers. Construction stopped on the Berlin and Nüremberg plans at the outbreak of war. Though stockpiling of materials and other work continued, this slowed to a halt as more resources were needed for the armament industry. Speer's offices undertook building work for each branch of the military, and for the SS, using slave labor. Speer's building work made him among the wealthiest of the Nazi elite.
Minister of Armaments
Appointment and increasing power
As one of the younger and more ambitious men in Hitler's inner circle, Speer was approaching the height of his power. In 1938, Prussian Minister President Hermann Göring had appointed him to the Prussian State Council. In 1941, he was elected to the Reichstag from electoral constituency 2 (Berlin–West). On 8 February 1942, Reich Minister of Armaments and Munitions Fritz Todt died in a plane crash shortly after taking off from Hitler's eastern headquarters at Rastenburg. Speer arrived there the previous evening and accepted Todt's offer to fly with him to Berlin. Speer cancelled some hours before take-off because the previous night he had been up late in a meeting with Hitler. Hitler appointed Speer in Todt's place. Martin Kitchen, a British historian, says that the choice was not surprising. Speer was loyal to Hitler, and his experience building prisoner of war camps and other structures for the military qualified him for the job. Speer succeeded Todt not only as Reich Minister but in all his other powerful positions, including Inspector General of German Roadways, Inspector General for Water and Energy and Head of the Nazi Party's Office of Technology. At the same time, Hitler also appointed Speer as head of the Organisation Todt, a massive, government-controlled construction company. Characteristically Hitler did not give Speer any clear remit; he was left to fight his contemporaries in the regime for power and control. As an example, he wanted to be given power over all armaments issues under Göring's Four Year Plan. Göring was reluctant to grant this. However Speer secured Hitler's support, and on 1 March 1942, Göring signed a decree naming Speer "General Plenipotentiary for Armament Tasks" in the Four Year Plan. Speer proved to be ambitious, unrelenting and ruthless. Speer set out to gain control not just of armaments production in the army, but in the whole armed forces. It did not immediately dawn on his political rivals that his calls for rationalization and reorganization were hiding his desire to sideline them and take control. By April 1942, Speer had persuaded Göring to create a three-member Central Planning Board within the Four Year Plan, which he used to obtain supreme authority over procurement and allocation of raw materials and scheduling of production in order to consolidate German war production in a single agency.
Speer was fêted at the time, and in the post-war era, for performing an "armaments miracle" in which German war production dramatically increased. This miracle was brought to a halt in the summer of 1943 by, among other factors, the first sustained Allied bombing. Other factors probably contributed to the increase more than Speer himself. Germany's armaments production had already begun to result in increases under his predecessor, Todt. Naval armaments were not under Speer's supervision until October 1943, nor the Luftwaffe's armaments until June of the following year. Yet each showed comparable increases in production despite not being under Speer's control. Another factor that produced the boom in ammunition was the policy of allocating more coal to the steel industry. Production of every type of weapon peaked in June and July 1944, but there was now a severe shortage of fuel. After August 1944, oil from the Romanian fields was no longer available. Oil production became so low that any possibility of offensive action became impossible and weaponry lay idle.
As Minister of Armaments, Speer was responsible for supplying weapons to the army. With Hitler's full agreement, he decided to prioritize tank production, and he was given unrivaled power to ensure success. Hitler was closely involved with the design of the tanks, but kept changing his mind about the specifications. This delayed the program, and Speer was unable to remedy the situation. In consequence, despite tank production having the highest priority, relatively little of the armaments budget was spent on it. This led to a significant German Army failure at the Battle of Prokhorovka, a major turning point on the Eastern Front against the Soviet Red Army.
As head of Organisation Todt, Speer was directly involved in the construction and alteration of concentration camps. He agreed to expand Auschwitz and some other camps, allocating 13.7 million Reichsmarks for the work to be carried out. This allowed an extra 300 huts to be built at Auschwitz, increasing the total human capacity to 132,000. Included in the building works was material to build gas chambers, crematoria and morgues. The SS called this "Professor Speer's Special Programme".
Speer realized that with six million workers drafted into the armed forces, there was a labor shortage in the war economy, and not enough workers for his factories. In response, Hitler appointed Fritz Sauckel as a "manpower dictator" to obtain new workers. Speer and Sauckel cooperated closely to meet Speer's labor demands. Hitler gave Sauckel a free hand to obtain labor, something that delighted Speer, who had requested 1,000,000 "voluntary" laborers to meet the need for armament workers. Sauckel had whole villages in France, Holland and Belgium forcibly rounded up and shipped to Speer's factories. Sauckel obtained new workers often using the most brutal methods. In occupied areas of the Soviet Union, that had been subject to partisan action, civilian men and women were rounded up en masse and sent to work forcibly in Germany. By April 1943, Sauckel had supplied 1,568,801 "voluntary" laborers, forced laborers, prisoners of war and concentration camp prisoners to Speer for use in his armaments factories. It was for the maltreatment of these people, that Speer was principally convicted at the Nuremberg trials.
Consolidation of arms production
Following his appointment as Minister of Armaments, Speer was in control of armaments production solely for the Army. He coveted control of the production of armaments for the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine as well. He set about extending his power and influence with unexpected ambition. His close relationship with Hitler provided him with political protection, and he was able to outwit and outmaneuver his rivals in the regime. Hitler's cabinet was dismayed at his tactics, but, regardless, he was able to accumulate new responsibilities and more power. By July 1943, he had gained control of armaments production for the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine. In August 1943, he took control of most of the Ministry of Economics, to become, in Admiral Dönitz's words, "Europe's economic dictator". His formal title was changed on 2 September 1943, to "Reich Minister for Armaments and War Production". He had become one of the most powerful people in Nazi Germany.
Speer and his hand-picked director of submarine construction Otto Merker [de] believed that the shipbuilding industry was being held back by outdated methods, and revolutionary new approaches imposed by outsiders would dramatically improve output. This belief proved incorrect, and Speer and Merker's attempt to build the Kriegsmarine's new generation of submarines, the Type XXI and Type XXIII, as prefabricated sections at different facilities rather than at single dockyards contributed to the failure of this strategically important program. The designs were rushed into production, but the completed submarines were crippled by construction flaws. While dozens of submarines were built, few ever entered service.
In December 1943, Speer visited Organisation Todt workers in Lapland, where he seriously damaged his knee and was incapacitated for several months. He was under the dubious care of Professor Karl Gebhardt at a medical clinic called Hohenlychen where patients "mysteriously failed to survive". In mid-January 1944, Speer had a lung embolism and fell seriously ill. Concerned about retaining power, he did not appoint a deputy and continued to direct work of the Armaments Ministry from his bedside. Speer's illness coincided with the Allied "Big Week", a series of bombing raids on the German aircraft factories that were a devastating blow to aircraft production. His political rivals used the opportunity to undermine his authority and damage his reputation with Hitler. He lost Hitler's unconditional support and began to lose power.
In response to the Allied Big Week, Adolf Hitler authorized the creation of a Fighter Staff committee. Its aim was to ensure the preservation and growth of fighter aircraft production. The task force was established by 1 March 1944, orders of Speer, with support from Erhard Milch of the Reich Aviation Ministry. Production of German fighter aircraft more than doubled between 1943 and 1944. The growth, however, consisted in large part of models that were becoming obsolescent and proved easy prey for Allied aircraft. On 1 August 1944, Speer merged the Fighter Staff into a newly formed Armament Staff committee.
The Fighter Staff committee was instrumental in bringing about the increased exploitation of slave labor in the war economy. The SS provided 64,000 prisoners for 20 separate projects from various concentration camps including Mittelbau-Dora. Prisoners worked for Junkers, Messerschmitt, Henschel and BMW, among others. To increase production, Speer introduced a system of punishments for his workforce. Those who feigned illness, slacked off, sabotaged production or tried to escape were denied food or sent to concentration camps. In 1944, this became endemic; over half a million workers were arrested. By this time, 140,000 people were working in Speer's underground factories. These factories were death-traps; discipline was brutal, with regular executions. There were so many corpses at the Dora underground factory, for example, that the crematorium was overwhelmed. Speer's own staff described the conditions there as "hell".
The largest technological advance under Speer's command came through the rocket program. It began in 1932 but had not supplied any weaponry. Speer enthusiastically supported the program and in March 1942 made an order for A4 rockets, the predecessor of the world's first ballistic missile, the V-2 rocket. The rockets were researched at a facility in Peenemünde along with the V-1 flying bomb. The V-2's first target was Paris on 8 September 1944. The program while advanced proved to be an impediment to the war economy. The large capital investment was not repaid in military effectiveness. The rockets were built at an underground factory at Mittelwerk. Labor to build the A4 rockets came from the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp. Of the 60,000 people who ended up at the camp 20,000 died, due to the appalling conditions.
On 14 April 1944, Speer lost control of Organisation Todt to his deputy, Franz Xaver Dorsch. He opposed the assassination attempt against Hitler on 20 July 1944. He was not involved in the plot, and played a minor role in the regime's efforts to regain control over Berlin after Hitler survived. After the plot Speer's rivals attacked some of his closest allies and his management system fell out of favor with radicals in the party. He lost yet more authority.
Defeat of Nazi Germany
Losses of territory and a dramatic expansion of the Allied strategic bombing campaign caused the collapse of the German economy from late 1944. Air attacks on the transport network were particularly effective, as they cut the main centres of production off from essential coal supplies. In January 1945, Speer told Goebbels that armaments production could be sustained for at least a year. However, he concluded that the war was lost after Soviet forces captured the important Silesian industrial region later that month. Nevertheless, Speer believed that Germany should continue the war for as long as possible with the goal of winning better conditions from the Allies than the unconditional surrender they insisted upon. During January and February, Speer claimed that his ministry would deliver "decisive weapons" and a large increase in armaments production which would "bring about a dramatic change on the battlefield". Speer gained control over the railways in February, and asked Heinrich Himmler to supply concentration camp prisoners to work on their repair.
By mid-March, Speer had accepted that Germany's economy would collapse within the next eight weeks. While he sought to frustrate directives to destroy industrial facilities in areas at risk of capture, so that they could be used after the war, he still supported the war's continuation. Speer provided Hitler with a memorandum on 15 March, which detailed Germany's dire economic situation and sought approval to cease demolitions of infrastructure. Three days later, he also proposed to Hitler that Germany's remaining military resources be concentrated along the Rhine and Vistula rivers in an attempt to prolong the fighting. This ignored military realities, as the German armed forces were unable to match the Allies' firepower and were facing total defeat. Hitler rejected Speer's proposal to cease demolitions. Instead, he issued the "Nero Decree" on 19 March, which called for the destruction of all infrastructure as the army retreated. Speer was appalled by this order, and persuaded several key military and political leaders to ignore it. During a meeting with Speer on 28/29 March, Hitler rescinded the decree and gave him authority over demolitions. Speer ended them, though the army continued to blow up bridges.
By April, little was left of the armaments industry, and Speer had few official duties. Speer visited the Führerbunker on 22 April for the last time. He met Hitler and toured the damaged Chancellery before leaving Berlin to return to Hamburg. Speer would later claim in his memoirs that during this visit he "confessed to Hitler that he was disobeying his 'scorched-earth' policy", an assertion which has been described as "pure invention" by historian Richard J. Evans. On 29 April, the day before committing suicide, Hitler dictated a final political testament which dropped Speer from the successor government. Speer was to be replaced by his subordinate, Karl-Otto Saur. Speer was disappointed that Hitler had not selected him as his successor. After Hitler's death, Speer offered his services to Hitler's successor, Karl Dönitz. On 2 May, Dönitz asked Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk to form a new government, and discussions went on about the formation of the administration for the next few days. On May 5, Schwerin von Krosigk presented his cabinet (known as the Flensburg government) and Speer was named as Minister of Industry and Production. Speer provided information to the Allies, regarding the effects of the air war, and on a broad range of subjects, beginning on 10 May. On 23 May, two weeks after the surrender of German forces, British troops arrested the members of the Flensburg Government and brought Nazi Germany to a formal end.
Post-war
Nuremberg trial
Main article: Nuremberg trialsSpeer was taken to several internment centres for Nazi officials and interrogated. In September 1945, he was told that he would be tried for war crimes, and several days later, he was moved to Nuremberg and incarcerated there. Speer was indicted on four counts: participating in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of crime against peace; planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace; war crimes; and crimes against humanity.
The chief United States prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, of the U.S. Supreme Court said, "Speer joined in planning and executing the program to dragoon prisoners of war and foreign workers into German war industries, which waxed in output while the workers waned in starvation." Speer's attorney, Hans Flächsner, successfully contrasted Speer from other defendants and portrayed him as an artist thrust into political life who had always remained a non-ideologue.
Speer was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, principally for the use of slave labor and forced labor. He was acquitted on the other two counts. He had claimed that he was unaware of Nazi extermination plans, and the Allies had no proof that he was aware. His claim was revealed to be false in a private correspondence written in 1971 and publicly disclosed in 2007. On 1 October 1946, he was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. While three of the eight judges (two Soviet and American Francis Biddle) advocated the death penalty for Speer, the other judges did not, and a compromise sentence was reached after two days of discussions.
Imprisonment
On 18 July 1947, Speer was transferred to Spandau Prison in Berlin to serve his prison term. There he was known as Prisoner Number Five. Speer's parents died while he was incarcerated. His father, who died in 1947, despised the Nazis and was silent upon meeting Hitler. His mother died in 1952. As a Nazi Party member, she had greatly enjoyed dining with Hitler. Wolters and longtime Speer secretary Annemarie Kempf, while not permitted direct communication with Speer in Spandau, did what they could to help his family and carry out the requests Speer put in letters to his wife—the only written communication he was officially allowed. Beginning in 1948, Speer had the services of Toni Proost, a sympathetic Dutch orderly, to smuggle mail and his writings.
In 1949, Wolters opened a bank account for Speer and began fundraising among those architects and industrialists who had benefited from Speer's activities during the war. Initially, the funds were used only to support Speer's family, but increasingly the money was used for other purposes. They paid for Toni Proost to go on holiday, and for bribes to those who might be able to secure Speer's release. Once Speer became aware of the existence of the fund, he sent detailed instructions about what to do with the money. Wolters raised a total of DM158,000 for Speer over the final seventeen years of his sentence.
The prisoners were forbidden to write memoirs. Speer was able to have his writings sent to Wolters, however, and they eventually amounted to 20,000 pages. He had completed his memoirs by November 1953, and they became the basis of Inside the Third Reich. In Spandau Diaries, Speer aimed to present himself as a tragic hero who had made a Faustian bargain for which he endured a harsh prison sentence.
Much of Speer's energy was dedicated to keeping fit, both physically and mentally, during his long confinement. Spandau had a large enclosed yard where inmates were allocated plots of land for gardening. Speer created an elaborate garden complete with lawns, flower beds, shrubbery, and fruit trees. To make his daily walks around the garden more engaging Speer embarked on an imaginary trip around the globe. Speer started his “walk” from Berlin and went eastward across the entirety of Eurasia, crossed the Bering Strait into Alaska and then traveled south down the west coast of North America. Carefully measuring distance travelled each day, he mapped distances to the real-world geography. He had walked more than 30,000 kilometres (19,000 mi), ending his sentence near Guadalajara, Mexico. Speer also read, studied architectural journals, and brushed up on English and French. In his writings, Speer claimed to have finished five thousand books while in prison. His sentence of twenty years amounted to 7,305 days, which only allotted one and a half days per book.
Speer's supporters maintained calls for his release. Among those who pledged support for his sentence to be commuted were Charles de Gaulle and US diplomat George Wildman Ball. Willy Brandt was an advocate of his release, putting an end to the de-Nazification proceedings against him, which could have caused his property to be confiscated. Speer's efforts for an early release came to naught. The Soviet Union, having demanded a death sentence at trial, was unwilling to entertain a reduced sentence. Speer served a full term and was released at midnight on 1 October 1966.
Release and later life
Speer's release from prison was a worldwide media event. Reporters and photographers crowded both the street outside Spandau and the lobby of the Hotel Berlin where Speer spent the night. He said little, reserving most comments for a major interview published in Der Spiegel in November 1966. Although he stated he hoped to resume an architectural career, his sole project, a collaboration for a brewery, was unsuccessful. Instead, he revised his Spandau writings into two autobiographical books, Inside the Third Reich (in German, Erinnerungen, or Reminiscences) and Spandau: The Secret Diaries. He later published a work about Himmler and the SS, which has been published in English as The Slave State: Heinrich Himmler's Masterplan for SS Supremacy or Infiltration: How Heinrich Himmler Schemed to Build an SS Industrial Empire (in German, Der Sklavenstaat - Meine Auseinandersetzung mit der SS). Speer was aided in shaping the works by Joachim Fest and Wolf Jobst Siedler from the publishing house Ullstein. He found himself unable to re-establish a relationship with his children, even with his son Albert, who had also become an architect. According to Speer's daughter Hilde Schramm, "One by one, my sister and brothers gave up. There was no communication." He provided financial support for his brother Hermann after the war. However, his other brother Ernst died at the Battle of Stalingrad, despite repeated requests from his parents for Speer to repatriate him.
Following his release from Spandau, Speer donated the Chronicle, his personal diary, to the German Federal Archives. It had been edited by Wolters and made no mention of the Jews. David Irving discovered discrepancies between the deceptively edited Chronicle and independent documents. Speer asked Wolters to destroy the material he had omitted from his donation but Wolters refused and retained an original copy. Wolters' friendship with Speer deteriorated, and one year before Speer's death, Wolters gave Matthias Schmidt access to the unedited Chronicle. Schmidt authored the first book highly critical of Speer.
Speer's memoirs were a phenomenal success. The public was fascinated by an inside view of the Third Reich and a major war criminal became a popular figure almost overnight. Importantly, he provided an alibi to older Germans who had been Nazis. If Speer, who had been so close to Hitler, had not known the full extent of the crimes of the Nazi regime and had just been "following orders", then they could tell themselves and others they too had done the same. So great was the need to believe this "Speer myth" that Fest and Siedler were able to strengthen it—even in the face of mounting historical evidence to the contrary.
Death
Speer made himself widely available to historians and other enquirers. In October 1973, he made his first trip to Britain, flying to London to be interviewed on the BBC Midweek programme. In the same year, he appeared on the television programme The World at War. Speer returned to London in 1981 to participate in the BBC Newsnight programme. He suffered a stroke and died in London on 1 September.
He had remained married to his wife, but he had formed a relationship with a German woman living in London and was with her at the time of his death. His daughter, Margret Nissen, wrote in her 2005 memoirs that after his release from Spandau he spent all of his time constructing the "Speer Myth".
The Speer myth
The Good Nazi
After his release from Spandau, Speer portrayed himself as the "good Nazi". He was well-educated, middle class, and bourgeois, and could contrast himself with those who, in the popular mind, typified "Bad Nazis". In his memoirs and interviews, he had distorted the truth and made so many major omissions that his lies became known as "myths". Speer even invented his own birth's circumstances, stating falsely that he was born at midday amid crashes of thunder and bells of the nearby Christ Church, whereas it was between three and five o'clock, and the church was built only some years after. Speer took his myth-making to a mass media level and his "cunning apologies" were reproduced frequently in post-war Germany. Isabell Trommer writes in her biography of Speer that Fest and Siedler were co-authors of Speer's memoirs and co-creators of his myths. In return they were paid handsomely in royalties and other financial inducements. Speer, Siedler and Fest had constructed a masterpiece; the image of the "good Nazi" remained in place for decades, despite historical evidence indicating that it was false.
Speer had carefully constructed an image of himself as an apolitical technocrat who deeply regretted having failed to discover the monstrous crimes of the Third Reich. This construction was accepted almost at face value by historian Hugh Trevor-Roper when investigating the death of Adolf Hitler for British Intelligence and in writing The Last Days of Hitler. Trevor-Roper frequently refers to Speer as "a technocrat nourished a technocrat's philosophy", one who cared only for his building projects or his ministerial duties, and who thought that politics was irrelevant, at least until Hitler's Nero Decree which Speer, according to his own telling, worked assiduously to counter. Trevor-Roper – who calls Speer an administrative genius whose basic instincts were peaceful and constructive – does take Speer to task, however, for his failure to recognize the immorality of Hitler and Nazism, calling him "the real criminal of Nazi Germany":
For ten years he sat at the very centre of political power; his keen intelligence diagnosed the nature and observed the mutations of Nazi government and policy; he saw and despised the personalities around him; he heard their outrageous orders and understood their fantastic ambitions; but he did nothing. Supposing politics to be irrelevant, he turned aside and built roads and bridges and factories, while the logical consequences of government by madmen emerged. Ultimately, when their emergence involved the ruin of all his work, Speer accepted the consequences and acted. Then it was too late; Germany had been destroyed.
After Speer's death, Matthias Schmidt published a book that demonstrated that Speer had ordered the eviction of Jews from their Berlin homes. By 1999, historians had amply demonstrated that Speer had lied extensively. Even so, public perceptions of Speer did not change substantially until Heinrich Breloer aired the biographical film Speer und Er on television in 2004. The film began a process of demystification and critical reappraisal of Speer. Adam Tooze in his book The Wages of Destruction said Speer had manoeuvred himself through the ranks of the regime skillfully and ruthlessly and that the idea he was a technocrat blindly carrying out orders was "absurd". Trommer said Speer was not an apolitical technocrat; instead, he was, in reality, one of the most powerful and unscrupulous leaders in the entire Nazi regime. Kitchen said Speer had deceived the Nuremberg Tribunal and post-war Germany. Brechtken said that if Speer's extensive involvement in the Holocaust had been known at the time of his trial he would have been sentenced to death.
The image of the "good Nazi" was supported by numerous Speer myths. In addition to the myth that he was an apolitical technocrat, he claimed he did not have full knowledge of the Holocaust or the persecution of the Jews. Another myth posits that Speer revolutionized the German war machine after his appointment as Minister of Armaments. He was credited with a dramatic increase in the shipment of arms that was widely reported as keeping Germany in the war. Another myth centered around a nonexistent plan to assassinate Hitler with poisonous gas. The idea for this myth came to him after he recalled the panic when car fumes came through an air ventilation system. He fabricated the additional details. Brechtken wrote that Speer's most brazen lie was fabricated during an interview with a French journalist in 1952. The journalist described an invented scenario in which Speer had refused Hitler's orders and Hitler had left with tears in his eyes. Speer liked the scenario so much that he included it in his memoirs. The journalist had unwittingly collaborated in creating one of his myths.
Speer also sought to portray himself as an opponent of Hitler's leadership. Despite his opposition to the 20 July plot, he falsely claimed in his memoirs to have been sympathetic to the plotters. He maintained Hitler was cool towards him for the remainder of his life after learning they had included him on a list of potential ministers. This formed a key element of the myths Speer encouraged. Speer also falsely claimed that he had realised the war was lost at an early stage, and thereafter worked to preserve the resources needed for the civilian population's survival. In reality, Speer had sought to prolong the war until further resistance was impossible, thus contributing to the large number of deaths and the extensive destruction Germany suffered during the final months of the war.
Denial of responsibility
Speer maintained at the Nuremberg trials and in his memoirs that he had no direct knowledge of the Holocaust. He admitted only to being uncomfortable around Jews in the published version of the Spandau Diaries. In his final statement at Nuremberg, Speer gave the impression of apologizing, although he did not directly admit any personal guilt and the only victim he mentioned was the German people. Historian Martin Kitchen states that Speer was actually "fully aware of what had happened to the Jews" and was "intimately involved in the 'Final Solution'". Brechtken said Speer only admitted to a generalized responsibility for the Holocaust to hide his direct and actual responsibility. Speer was photographed with slave laborers at Mauthausen concentration camp during a visit on 31 March 1943; he also visited Gusen concentration camp. Although survivor Francisco Boix testified at the Nuremberg trials about Speer's visit, Taylor writes that, had the photo been available, he would have been hanged. In 2005, The Daily Telegraph reported that documents had surfaced indicating that Speer had approved the allocation of materials for the expansion of Auschwitz concentration camp after two of his assistants inspected the facility on a day when almost a thousand Jews were massacred. Heinrich Breloer, discussing the construction of Auschwitz, said Speer was not just a cog in the work—he was the "terror itself".
Speer did not deny being present at the Posen speeches to Nazi leaders at a conference in Posen (Poznań) on 6 October 1943, but claimed to have left the auditorium before Himmler said during his speech: "The grave decision had to be taken to cause this people to vanish from the earth", and later, "The Jews must be exterminated". Speer is mentioned several times in the speech, and Himmler addresses him directly. In 2007, The Guardian reported that a letter from Speer dated 23 December 1971, had been found in a collection of his correspondence with Hélène Jeanty, the widow of a Belgian resistance fighter. In the letter, Speer says, "There is no doubt—I was present as Himmler announced on October 6, 1943, that all Jews would be killed."
Armaments miracle
Speer was credited with an "armaments miracle". During the winter of 1941–42, in the light of Germany's disastrous defeat in the Battle of Moscow, the German leadership including Friedrich Fromm, Georg Thomas and Fritz Todt had come to the conclusion that the war could not be won. The rational position to adopt was to seek a political solution that would end the war without defeat. Speer in response used his propaganda expertise to display a new dynamism of the war economy. He produced spectacular statistics, claiming a sixfold increase in munitions production, a fourfold increase in artillery production, and he sent further propaganda to the newsreels of the country. He was able to curtail the discussion that the war should be ended.
The armaments "miracle" was a myth; Speer had used statistical manipulation to support his claims. The production of armaments did rise; however, this was due to the normal causes of reorganization before Speer came to office, the relentless mobilization of slave labor and a deliberate reduction in the quality of output to favor quantity. By July 1943 Speer's armaments propaganda became irrelevant because a catalogue of dramatic defeats on the battlefield meant the prospect of losing the war could no longer be hidden from the German public.
Architectural legacy
Little remains of Speer's personal architectural works, other than the plans and photographs. No buildings designed by Speer during the Nazi era are extant in Berlin, other than the four entrance pavilions and underpasses leading to the Victory Column, or Siegessäule, and the Schwerbelastungskörper, a heavy load-bearing body built around 1941. The concrete cylinder, 14 metres (46 ft) high, was used to measure ground subsidence as part of feasibility studies for a massive triumphal arch and other large structures planned within Hitler's post-war renewal project for the city of Berlin as the world capital Germania. The cylinder is now a protected landmark and is open to the public. The tribune of the Zeppelinfeld stadium in Nuremberg, though partly demolished, can also be seen.
During the war, the Speer-designed New Reich Chancellery was largely destroyed by air raids and in the Battle of Berlin. The exterior walls survived, but they were eventually dismantled by the Soviets. Unsubstantiated rumors have claimed that the remains were used for other building projects such as the Humboldt University, Mohrenstraße metro station and Soviet war memorials in Berlin.
See also
- Speer Goes to Hollywood
- Downfall, 2004 German film where he was portrayed by actor Heino Ferch
- Legion Speer
- Transportflotte Speer
- Transportkorps Speer
- Hermann Giesler
References
Informational notes
- Until 2 September 1943, the position's official name was Reich Minister of Armaments and Munitions.
- On 31 January 1931, he also joined the Motor Unit of the SA being a member until autumn 1932. On 20 July 1942, Speer was enrolled by order of Heinrich Himmler as a SS Man/member of Personal Staff Reichsführer-SS . However his application was never completed, becoming nolle prosequi.
- For a treatise on this aspect of the war including Speer's involvement see: Randall, Hansen, Disobeying Hitler: German Resistance in the Last Year of WWII, Faber & Faber, 2014, 1st edition, ISBN 978-0-571-28451-1.
- See the official website of Berlin at: https://www.berlin.de/en/attractions-and-sights/3560160-3104052-victory-column.en.html
Citations
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 174–175.
- Schubert 2006, p. 5.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 15.
- King 1997, p. 27.
- ^ Taylor 2010, p. 124.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 23.
- Fest 1999, pp. 11–13.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 17–18.
- Sereny 1995, p. 63.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 18–19.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 34–36.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 71–73.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 33–34.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 47–49.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, pp. 327–328.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 24.
- Nazi conspiracy and aggression 1946, pp. 256–257.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 25–26.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 100–101.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 49.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 41.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 101–103.
- Sereny 1995, p. 106.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 41–42.
- Hamsher 1970.
- ^ Reinecke 2017.
- Brechtken 2017, p. 45.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 60.
- ^ van der Vat 1997, p. 59.
- Sereny 1995, p. 131.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 65.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 60.
- Fest 1999, p. 64.
- Speer 1970, p. 118.
- Sereny 1995, p. 140.
- Sereny 1995, p. 141.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 65–70.
- Sereny 1995, p. 27.
- Fest 1999, p. 71.
- Sereny 1995, p. 550.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 46–47.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 45.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 46–49.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, pp. 53–56.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 72.
- Sereny 1995, p. 164.
- Fest 1999, p. 116.
- Fest 1999, p. 120.
- ^ Schmidt 1984, p. 189.
- Schmidt 1984, p. 190.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 322.
- Fest 1999, p. 115.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 78.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 39–40.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 75–76.
- Lilla 2005, pp. 239, 298.
- ^ Wistrich 1982, p. 291.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 117–118.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 120–121.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 6.
- Carroll 2018, p. 234.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 122.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 148–149.
- U.S. Government 1950, p. 374.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 597–598.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 368–370.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 575–576.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 232–233.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 127.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 145–147.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 147–148.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 156.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 150.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 151–152.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 159.
- Fest 1999, pp. 146–150.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 165–166.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 160.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, pp. 7–8.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 167–169.
- Tooze 2006, p. 614.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 616–618.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, pp. 8–9.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 188.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 188–189.
- Boog, Krebs & Vogel 2006, p. 347.
- Overy 2002, p. 343.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 582–584.
- Uziel 2012, p. 82.
- Buggeln 2014, p. 45.
- Buggeln 2014, pp. 46–48.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 215.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 221.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 216.
- Speer 1970, pp. 432–433.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 204–205.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 8.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 648–651.
- Tooze 2006, p. 652.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 259.
- ^ Kershaw 2012, p. 289.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 254.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 261–262.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 652–653.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 262–263.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 265–267.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 269–270.
- Kershaw 2012, p. 291.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 275.
- Fest 1999, pp. 263–270.
- ^ Evans 1997, p. 202.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 234.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 277.
- Fest 1999, pp. 273–281.
- Jaskot 2002, pp. 140–141.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 288.
- Sereny 1995, p. 561.
- Fest 1999, p. 285.
- Conot 1983, p. 471.
- Priemel 2016, pp. 139–140.
- Fest 1999, pp. 287–288.
- ^ Connolly 2007.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 281–282.
- Sereny 1995, p. 29.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 288.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 314–315.
- ^ van der Vat 1997, pp. 292–297.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 298.
- Fest 1999, p. 316.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 325.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 321–322.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 323.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 316.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 316, 325.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 316–317.
- Fest 1999, p. 319.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 319.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 324.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 299–300.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 320–321.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 324–325.
- Fest 1999, pp. 320–321.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 333–334.
- Sereny 1995, p. 5.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 329–330.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 664–665.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 339–343.
- Sereny 1995, pp. 226–227.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 359–361.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 335.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 366.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 354.
- Asher 2003.
- Fest 1999, p. 337.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 362–363.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 343.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 327–360.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 362.
- ^ Seelow 2018.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 14.
- Trommer 2016, p. 80.
- ^ Schwendemann 2016.
- Trommer 2016, p. 330.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 345–346.
- Trevor-Roper 1995, pp. 68–70, 214–215.
- Trevor-Roper 1995, pp. 214–215.
- Schmidt 1984, p. 186.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, pp. 360–362.
- Tooze 2006, p. 553.
- Tooze 2006, p. 552.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 296–297.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 205.
- Tooze 2006, p. 653.
- Priemel 2016, p. 141.
- Kitchen 2015, pp. 100, 322.
- Pike 2003, p. 340, fn 40.
- Taylor 2010, pp. 204–205.
- ^ Connolly 2005.
- van der Vat 1997, pp. 167–168.
- ^ Kitchen 2015, p. 345.
- ^ Tooze 2006, p. 554.
- Tooze 2006, p. 555.
- Tooze 2006, pp. 552–557.
- van der Vat 1997, p. 75.
- Museen der Stadt Nürnberg.
- Kitchen 2015, p. 56.
Bibliography
- Printed sources
- Boog, Horst; Krebs, Gerhard; Vogel, Detlef (2006), Germany and the Second World War: Volume VII: The Strategic Air War in Europe and the War in the West and East Asia, 1943–1944/5, London: Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0198228899
- Brechtken, Magnus (2017), Albert Speer: Eine deutsche Karriere, Germany: Siedler Verlag, ISBN 978-3827500403
- Buggeln, Marc (2014), Slave Labor in Nazi Concentration Camps, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0198707974
- Carroll, Berenice Anita (2018), Design for Total War: Arms and Economics in the Third Reich, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., ISBN 978-3111359588
- Conot, Robert (1983), Justice at Nuremberg, New York: Harper & Row, ISBN 978-0-88184-032-2
- Evans, Richard J. (1997), Rereading German History: From Unification to Reunification 1800-1996, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-41-515899-2
- Fest, Joachim (1999), Speer: The Final Verdict, translated by Ewald Osers and Alexandra Dring, Harcourt, ISBN 978-0-15-100556-7
- Hamsher, William (1970), Albert Speer-Victim of Nuremberg?, Leslie Frewin Publishers Ltd, ISBN 978-0091015107
- Jaskot, Paul B. (2002), The Architecture of Oppression: The SS, Forced Labor and the Nazi Monumental Building Economy, London and New York: Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-1-13459-462-7
- Kershaw, Ian (2012), The End: Hitler's Germany, 1944–45, London: Penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-141-01421-0
- King, Henry T. (1997), The Two Worlds of Albert Speer: Reflections of a Nuremberg Prosecutor, University Press of America, ISBN 978-0-7618-0872-5
- Kitchen, Martin (2015), Speer: Hitler's Architect, Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-19044-1
- Lilla, Joachim (2005), Der Preußische Staatsrat 1921–1933: Ein biographisches Handbuch, Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag, ISBN 978-3-770-05271-4
- Office of United States Chief of Counsel For Prosecution of Axis Criminality (1946), "Document 3568-PS", Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, VI, Washington: United States Government Printing Office
- Overy, Richard (2002) , War and Economy in the Third Reich, Oxford: Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-820599-9
- Pike, David Wingeate (2003), Spaniards in the Holocaust: Mauthausen, Horror on the Danube, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-134-58713-1
- Priemel, Kim Christian (2016), The Betrayal: The Nuremberg Trials and German Divergence, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-256374-3
- Schmidt, Matthias (1984), Albert Speer: The End of a Myth, St. Martin's Press, ISBN 978-0-312-01709-5
- Schubert, Philipp (2006), Albert Speer: Architekt – Günstling Hitlers – Rüstungsminister – Hauptkriegsverbrecher, Munich: GRIN Verlag, ISBN 978-3-638-59047-1
- Sereny, Gitta (1995), Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth, Knopf, ISBN 978-0-394-52915-8
- Speer, Albert (1970), Inside the Third Reich, New York: Avon Books, ISBN 978-0380000715
- Taylor, Blaine (2010), Hitler's Engineers: Fritz Todt and Albert Speer – Master Builders of the Third Reich, Translated by Richard and Clara Winston, Havertown, PA and Newbury, England: Casemate Publishers, ISBN 978-1-932033-68-7
- Tooze, Adam (2006), The Wages of Destruction, London: Allen Lane, ISBN 978-0-7139-9566-4
- Trevor-Roper, Hugh (1995) , The Last Days of Hitler (seventh ed.), London: Pan Books, ISBN 978-1-4472-1861-6
- Trommer, Isabell (2016), Rechtfertigung und Entlastung: Albert Speer in der Bundesrepublik, Campus Verlag GmbH, ISBN 978-3593505299
- Uziel, Daniel (2012), Arming the Luftwaffe: The German Aviation Industry in World War II, McFarland, ISBN 978-0-7864-6521-7
- van der Vat, Dan (1997), The Good Nazi: The Life and Lies of Albert Speer, George Weidenfeld & Nicolson, ISBN 978-0-297-81721-5
- Wistrich, Robert (1982), Who's Who in Nazi Germany, Macmillan Publishing Co., ISBN 0-02-630600-X
- Online sources
- Asher, Edgar (21 November 2003), "The day I met Hitler's Architect", Chicago Jewish Star, pp. 7, 9
- Connolly, Kate (11 May 2005), "Wartime reports debunk Speer as the good Nazi", The Daily Telegraph, UK, retrieved 11 January 2014
- Connolly, Kate (13 March 2007), "Letter proves Speer knew of Holocaust plan", The Guardian, retrieved 7 May 2017
- Reinecke, Stefan (22 June 2017), "Historiker über Albert Speer: "Er tat alles für den Endsieg"", Die Tageszeitung: Taz, Germany, retrieved 22 June 2017
- Schwendemann, Heinrich (30 November 2016), "Rechtfertigung und Entlastung. Albert Speer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland", Rezensiert für H-Soz-Kult von, Germany, ISBN 9783593505299, retrieved 12 April 2019
- Seelow, A. (2018), "Demystifying Hitler's Favorite Architect. Review of: Magnus Brechtken, Albert Speer. Eine deutsche Karriere", Architectural Histories, 6 (1): 1–11, doi:10.5334/ah.334
- Official website of the Memorium Nuremberg Trials, Museen der Stadt Nürnberg, retrieved 5 November 2014
- U.S. Government (1950), Trials of the War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals (PDF), vol. II: The Milch Case, United States Printing Office, archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2021, retrieved 27 June 2021
Further reading
- Causey, Charles M. (2016), The Lion and the Lamb: The True Holocaust Story of a Powerful Nazi Leader and a Dutch Resistance Worker, Westbow Press, ISBN 978-1-51276-109-2
- Krier, Léon (1985), Albert Speer's life: Architecture, 1932–1942, Archives D'Architecture Moderne, ISBN 978-2-87143-006-3
- Schroeter, Wolfgang (2018), Albert Speer: Aufstieg und Fall eines Mythos (in German), Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, ISBN 978-3-657-78913-9
External links
- Newspaper clippings about Albert Speer in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW
- "Speer cross-examination", law2.umkc.edu, University of Missouri–Kansas City, retrieved 8 January 2012
- Francisco Boix identifies Speer at Nuremberg
- Albert Speer: Chief Architect of the Third Reich - warfarehistorynetwork.com
- Albert Speer
- 1905 births
- 1981 deaths
- 20th-century German architects
- 20th-century German male writers
- Architects from Mannheim
- Architects in the Nazi Party
- German memoirists
- German neoclassical architects
- German people convicted of crimes against humanity
- Government ministers of Nazi Germany
- Holocaust perpetrators
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology alumni
- Members of the Prussian State Council (Nazi Germany)
- Members of the Reichstag 1938–1945
- Military logistics of Nazi Germany
- Nazi Party officials
- Neurological disease deaths in England
- People convicted by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg
- People from the Grand Duchy of Baden
- Politicians from Mannheim
- Recipients of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross
- Speer family
- Technische Universität Berlin alumni
- Technical University of Munich alumni