| Revision as of 16:11, 9 October 2018 editNomoskedasticity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,766 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Mehmet Oz. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:18, 20 November 2018 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,989 edits →ArbCom 2018 election voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| == Watch it. == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Amsgearing. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| You made an immense unfair revert, attacking an IP editor of vandalism. Watch it. ] (]) 21:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : It was vandalism, whether or not you post a threat on my talk page. "watch it"??? Really??? Get away from me, troll. ] (]) 11:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| I recently reverted edits you made in the ] page because driver/team change information is not trivia. They may not be sourced, but we can work on finding sources. A simple check to the previous year’s page shows the importance of this section. As an inclusionist, I will find sources for this info and add it. The tenses should also still be current, as the season is ongoing. Thank you. ] (]) 22:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| : Yeah I left a message on your talk page. ] (]) 23:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> | |||
| == |
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | ||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Amsgearing. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| <s>] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —specifically <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 12:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)</s> | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ] Hi, and thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you tried to give ] a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "]", and it is undesirable because it splits the ], which is ]. Instead, the software used by Misplaced Pages has a feature that allows pages to be ''moved'' to a new title together with their edit history. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| In most cases, once your account is ], you should be able to move an article yourself using the ] at the top of the page (the tab may be ] for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a ] from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at ] to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-c&pmove --> ] (]) 00:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| : Okay. I think I do need to go to ] - however, after reading that page, I have to confess I'm confused about what I should actually do there. As in, which page do I list as a request for history merge, how do I do it, etc. It's very convoluted and I don't want to screw this up more than I already have. Please help! Thanks. ] (]) 01:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 17== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please see the ], where an overwhelming majority (4 to none, 4 to 1 if I include the editor who inserted it into the article) is against keeping this sentence which clearly fails ] and ]. The sentence is not stable, it was inserted and I challenged it immediately upon noticing it (which didn't happen until yesterday). 5 days is not "long-standing consensus" by any measure. ] (]) 17:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : Sorry about that, you are correct, I was looking only at the removal of the sources, and incorrectly assumed that the sentence had been there long before. ] (]) 17:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Google didn't let me see that source. ], I searched online for a alternative source for about half an hour. I almost ordered a copy of the ''Idiots Guide''. I assume you can see it! Thanks. ] (]) 19:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : Yep, no worries. I just noticed an anonymous IP changed that tidbit in April; surprised no one noticed. ] (]) 19:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Thompson == | |||
| I have a serious issue with the item around Thompson’s alleged “dislike” of black players and feel it constitutes ]. You have not addressed why you disagree. I will take it to a 3rd party if we can’t work this out between us ] (]) 16:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : Whoa, calm down there fella. Gimmie more than 30 seconds to reply next time, okay? I responded on your talk page. ] (]) 16:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :: sorry, I posted this before reading your last message - I think we are just talking past each other. Maybe slow down on editing the article? ] (]) 16:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for fixing my sloppy prose == | |||
| on the Pruitt article, you beat me to it. Cheers. ] (]) 17:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==In popular culture section== | |||
| I have reinserted all the cited material. However I am not in an edit war here. Btw I agree that some of the wording is sloppy, and not encyclopaedic, and I have no problems with you deleting any unsourced material. If you have any problems, with the provisional edit here, maybe we can talk about this briefly, and in good faith, on the Geordie talk page? Thank you. ] (]) 23:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : I'm starting a discussion on the talk page. ] (]) 03:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-delete4im --> | |||
| :: Nice try, ]. But you forgot to sign your post. And you also forgot to become an admin, which I believe is required before you can block me. ] (]) 19:12, 2 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I am genuinely not edit warring with you. I reported you for section blanking, which you have clearly done if you look at the diffs. I offered you the opportunity to go to a 3rd party to discuss this you refused and reverted and section blanked.] (]) 20:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::: To try to resolve this I have gone here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Geordie#Mostly_unsourced_In_popular_culture_section ] (]) 22:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: You're still ignoring my request to for you to list your other accounts. You're still ignoring ]. You're not editing in good faith. You're an editor who has likely been blocked before and is running multiple accounts, by your own admission. Good day, I'm done with you. ] (]) 09:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for August 4== | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
| (].) --] (]) 09:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Amsgearing. Are you aware of ]? Thanks. ] (]) 16:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : Uh yeah. Now I am. I did try to correct what I saw as the issue in that section. Not sure why one article by a non-notable in a non-notable periodical was given 60% of the space in the "reaction" section. I agree that it's probably fine to exist there, but editing it down significantly seems to bring the section more in line with ]. If you don't see it that way, I guess revert me again and I'll start another discussion on the talk page. ] (]) 16:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :: I don't wish to edit war, thanks. You should self-revert and, if you still feel as strongly about this, start the discussion yourself. Many thanks. ] (]) 16:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] photo == | |||
| Ams, I don't understand your photo deletion rationale. In what sense is the photo "unverified", and why would it be nonsensical to use a photo of a person from high school? It's from the high school yearbook that I was head photographer for, and it comes with a caption identifying him. I also connected on LinkedIn and got his approval to use it on his article; if he had any reason to think it was not an appropriate depiction, he didn't raise it. Of course, if you have a more recent photo that's PD or licenseable, we should use that, too. ] (]) 16:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2018 == | |||
| ] ] to ] could give Misplaced Pages contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that making such threats on Misplaced Pages is '''''strictly prohibited''''' under Misplaced Pages's policies on ] and ]. '''Users who make such threats may be ]'''. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Misplaced Pages, please follow the proper channels for ]. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by ] and focusing especially on ] errors of fact. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-legal --> ] (]) 16:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| : That's ridiculous. Misplaced Pages's own policies state we have to be extra careful about BLPs. I'm not talking about bringing legal action against anyone. I'm talking about protecting Misplaced Pages from legal action from the subjects of BLPs. ] (]) 16:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 20 November 2018
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Amsgearing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Amsgearing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)