| Revision as of 03:08, 21 November 2006 edit58.178.104.174 (talk) →NLP← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:18, 4 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (126 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: lightblue; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| == Recent reverts on NLP == | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| <big>'''Blocked as a sockpuppet'''<br /></big>{{clear}} | |||
| '''''You have been ] indefinitely''''' as a ] of {{ #if: {{{1|}}} | ] (<span style="font-size:0.9em;" class="plainlinks">] • ] • • }})</span>. | a banned or blocked user.}} As a blocked or banned user '''you are not entitled to edit Misplaced Pages'''. All your edits have been reverted. | |||
| {{ #if: | <p>'''Further comments:''' {{{2}}}</p>}} | |||
| Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: ]. You can also email the blocking administrator or any active administrator from ]. Please be sure to include your ] (if you have one) and ] in your email. <!-- Template:Sockblock --></div> | |||
| |} | |||
| I fixed up the language on the techniques section of the NLP article. Only to have it reverted by you without discussion. I'll work on another revision of it and post that tomorrow. Please discuss it before reverting. --] 10:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The rules in the policy pages are clear. You will need to read up on language improvement first. NPOV policy page is the best, and there is a lot more you could do about words to avoid - also there is a lot of blurb with no sourcing, you seem to know the subject a bit so I suggest finding sources for that pretty pronto. ] 10:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Block == | ||
| :I have access to Psychinfo (OVID), so I can look it up here. I'll rewrite that Techniques section and make sure it is in line with the style/source before posting it. Your edits to the scope section were fine. Please add the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> to any views that require citations. --] 10:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have blocked you as a sockpuppet of HeadlyDown. I requested a checkuser be run privately, and the checkuser results combined with your extensive editting of the ] article confirm that you are HeadlyDown, a user banned indefinitely from editting Misplaced Pages under any name.—] (]) 07:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'm working with the actual quotes given in that patterns section. It fits policy perfectly. Any rewriting will need discussion first so best post it in the discussion section. ] 10:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I disagree with your view on the current patterns section. The format is not within the style guidelines, and it it appears to portray an unbalanced view. How can you say it fits policy perfectly? --] 10:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : HeadleyDown's response to the above was of being a reincarnation of a banned editor, and yet more "smoke", including usual allegations of others misconduct or bias. It is clear from the article he edited (which is consistent with past actions) that the view of multiple other editors was agreed that HeadleyDown had not in fact reformed, and was not being "constructive". After three months of editing, "AlanBarnets" track record on NLP was that his edits were by consensus regularly ignored or reverted, rather than discussed. | |||
| It uses verifiable and reliable sources, and is written using neutral language. How do you justify your opinion writing in your suggested section? ] 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't agree that the language is neutral. And there are much more reliable sources available for those techniques. I've expanded my reasoning on the talk page. --] 12:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : In line with with the editor's original user and talk page (), this page is also blanked. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] | ])</span></sup> 11:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I replied to your objections. Basically consensus or agreement does not trump NPOV policy. Sorry. ] 12:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Are you willing to get a third opinion on this? I think my version of that section was closer to NPOV than they version you keep inserting. Nonetheless, I'll rework it. NPOV says that "the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a ], and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each."] --] 02:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, third opinions are fine by me. What I have included has improved the article. ] 22:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, I want to work with you on this. If we come to any significant disagreements on the page let's use see if we can work it out first and use ] as a secondary method. Also, let's see if we can work on different sections of the article to bring them up to scratch. I believe that you are editing in good faith given that most of your recent edits have improved the article. BTW, I don't think you are one of the banned editors (as per below). --] 04:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you want to work with any editor here you will have to stop deleting information as it is quoted in the sources. Your reasons for doing so are highly transparent as I have worked out how to check your history and your reasons for deleting or changing are not supported by any of the information from the sources I have gathered or the rest of the article. I see that the user Woohookitty has come to similar conclusions as myself. I will see about that third opinion myself. ] 13:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I checked the sources myself and my reasons are within policy. Rather than blanket reverting please tag any disputed statements with "dubious" or "fact" tags. I have some spare time now so I'm going to work on the article. If you want to work on specific section then please let me know what section and I'll leave it for a while. Otherwise, I'll be doing alot of changes over the next few days. It is probably best if you wait until then to do any copyediting. --] 14:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Banned from editing Neuorlinguistic Programming == | |||
| Hi AB, | |||
| Are you the user previously known as or any other user banned from Misplaced Pages? ] 23:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| No I never got banned from anything in my life. Who are you by the way? ] 10:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Nice try but you're not fooling anyone. Stop your campaign here. You're wasting your life. Your mother didn't get you into Hong Kong university so you could troll your life away. Unless you plan to police the article for the rest of your life you got ]. ] 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| I want nothing to do with that article. I had my fill and then some. --]<sup>]</sup> 14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm beginning to see your wisdom. ] 14:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop! I'm currenting doing a fact and reference check. --] 14:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| No Comaze your deletions will get reverted if you persist with the warped changes. You are the one making odd changes so you should be the one trying to persuade on the discussion page so that we can assess such dubious stuff. ] 14:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : No AB, it's you who is stirring up a war on the NLP article. It's getting high time that you were checkusered and banned again. You not only fit the profile of the HKU banned users but you are doing identical edits. All users should simply ignore and revert you. ] 03:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 4 March 2023
  |
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Misplaced Pages. All your edits have been reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Misplaced Pages:Appealing a block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any active administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email. |
Block
I have blocked you as a sockpuppet of HeadlyDown. I requested a checkuser be run privately, and the checkuser results combined with your extensive editting of the Neurolinguistic programming article confirm that you are HeadlyDown, a user banned indefinitely from editting Misplaced Pages under any name.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- HeadleyDown's response to the above was acknowledgement of being a reincarnation of a banned editor, and yet more "smoke", including usual allegations of others misconduct or bias. It is clear from the article he edited (which is consistent with past actions) that the view of multiple other editors was agreed that HeadleyDown had not in fact reformed, and was not being "constructive". After three months of editing, "AlanBarnets" track record on NLP was that his edits were by consensus regularly ignored or reverted, rather than discussed.
- In line with with the editor's original user and talk page (Log), this page is also blanked. FT2 11:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)