Misplaced Pages

Assumption of Mary: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:02, 16 April 2019 editMannanan51 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers28,697 edits Public holidays: expanded← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:40, 2 January 2025 edit undoJasterOmega (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,397 edits History: more precise. 
(859 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Bodily taking up of the Virgin Mary into Heaven}}
{{Redirect|Assunta|the hospital in Malaysia|Assunta Hospital}}
{{Redirect|Santa Maria Assunta|churches with this dedication|Santa Maria Assunta (churches)}} {{Redirect|Santa Maria Assunta|churches with this dedication|Santa Maria Assunta (churches)}}
{{Redirect|Saint Mary of the Assumption|cathedrals with this dedication|Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption (disambiguation){{!}}Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption}} {{Redirect|Saint Mary of the Assumption|cathedrals with this dedication|Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption (disambiguation){{!}}Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption}}
{{About|the theological concept|works of art with this title|Assumption of the Virgin Mary in Art}} {{About|the theological concept|works of art with this title|Assumption of the Virgin Mary in art}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2016}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2016}}
{{Infobox holiday {{Infobox holiday
|holiday_name = Assumption of Mary | holiday_name = Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary
|type = | type =
|longtype = Christian | longtype = Christian
|image = Baroque Rubens Assumption-of-Virgin-3.jpg | image = Tizian 041.jpg
|caption = ''The Assumption of Mary'', ], circa 1626 | caption = A famous treatment in Western art, ], 1516–1518
|nickname = {{plainlist| | nickname = {{indented plainlist|
*The Assumption * The Assumption
* Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary}}
*Feast of Saint Mary the Virgin, Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ<ref name=Anglican>{{cite book |title= Episcopal Advance |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=8XjkAAAAMAAJ |volume=99–101 |date= February 1970 |publisher= Episcopal Diocese of Chicago |quote= On the fifteenth of August, the Feast of Saint Mary the Virgin, Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Episcopal Church prays: "O God, you have taken to yourself the blessed Virgin Mary, mother of your incarnate Son: Grant that we, who have been redeemed by his blood, may share with her the glory of your eternal kingdom; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. ''Amen''.}}</ref>
| observedby = {{indented plainlist|
*Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary<ref name="PrayerBook"/>}}
* ] (see ])
|observedby = {{plainlist|
*] (see ]) * ] (see ])
* ]
*Parts of the ] (see ])
* ]}}
*] (see ])
| duration = 1 day
*]}}
|duration = 1 day | frequency = Annual
| observances = Attending ] or ]
|frequency = annual
| celebrations =
|observances = Attending ] or ]
| date = {{ubli|15 August|Sunday nearest to 15 August (])<ref>{{cite web |url=https://armenianchurch.us/the-mother-of-god/assumption-of-the-holy-mother-of-god/ |title=Feast of the Assumption of the Holy Mother-of-God |publisher=The Armenian Church |access-date=August 23, 2021 |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816102810/https://armenianchurch.us/the-mother-of-god/assumption-of-the-holy-mother-of-god/ |archive-date=16 August 2021 }}</ref>}}
|celebrations =
|relatedto = | relatedto =
|significance = the ] of the ] into ] | significance = The ] of ] into ]
}} }}
], Ireland, to the promulgation of the dogma of the Assumption]]


The '''Assumption of Mary''' is one of the four ]. Pope ] defined it on 1 November 1950 in his ] {{lang|la|]}} as follows:
The '''Assumption of Mary''' into Heaven (often shortened to '''the Assumption''') is, according to the beliefs of the ], ] and ],<ref name="England1907">{{cite book |author= Church of England |title= The Annotated Book of Common Prayer: An Historical, Ritual, and Theological Commentary on the Devotional System of the Church of England |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=01T-IGOmTlEC&pg=PA159 |accessdate= 15 August 2015 |year=1907 |publisher= Longmans, Green and Company |page= 159}}</ref> the ] of the ] into ] at the end of her earthly life.


{{blockquote|
The Catholic Church teaches as ] that the Virgin Mary "having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory".<ref>Pope Pius XII: {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |date=4 September 2013 }}, par. 44. Vatican, 1 November 1950</ref> This doctrine was ] by ] on 1 November 1950, in the apostolic constitution '']'' by exercising ].<ref>''Encyclopedia of Catholicism'' by Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton 207 {{ISBN|0-8160-5455-X}} p. 267</ref> While the Catholic Church and ] believe in the ] ("the Falling Asleep of the Mother of God"),<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |date=4 September 2013 }} In the liturgical books which deal with the feast either of the dormition or of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin there are expressions that agree in testifying that, when the Virgin Mother of God passed from this earthly exile to heaven, what happened to her sacred body was, by the decree of divine Providence, in keeping with the dignity of the Mother of the Word Incarnate, and with the other privileges she had been accorded.</ref> whether Mary had a physical death has not been dogmatically defined. In '']'' (item 39) Pope Pius XII pointed to the ] (]) as scriptural support for the dogma in terms of Mary's victory over sin and death through her intimate association with "the new Adam" (Christ)<ref>http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus.html</ref> as also reflected in ]: "then shall come to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory".<ref name=IntroM75>''Introduction to Mary'' by Mark Miravalle (1993) Queenship Pub. Co. {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}} pp. 75–78</ref><ref name="Mariology pages 328-350">Paul Haffner in ''Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, seminarians, and Consecrated Persons'' (2008) {{ISBN|9781579183554}} edited by M. Miravalle, pp. 328–350</ref><ref name="item 39at the Vatican web site">Apostolic Constitution '']'' {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |date=4 September 2013 }}</ref>
We pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever-Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.|Pope Pius XII, {{lang|la|]}}, 1950<ref name="auto">{{cite web | url=https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus.html | title=Munificentissimus Deus |date=November 1, 1950 |author=Pius XII |publisher=Holy See}}</ref>}}


It leaves open the question of whether Mary died or whether she was raised to ] without bodily death.{{sfn|Collinge|2012|p=53}}
The ] contains no explicit narrative about the death or Dormition, nor of the Assumption of Mary, but several scriptural passages have been theologically interpreted to describe the ultimate fate in this and the afterworld of the Mother of Jesus (see ]).<ref name="ARCIC"/>


The equivalent belief in the ] is the ] or the "Falling Asleep of the Mother of God".
In the churches that observe it, the Assumption is a major ], commonly celebrated on 15 August. In many countries, the feast is also marked as a ] in the Roman Catholic Church.


The word 'assumption' derives from the ] word {{lang|la|assūmptiō}}, meaning 'taking up'.
==History of the belief==
The Assumption (Latin: ''assumptio'', "a taking") was defined as ] by the Catholic Church in 1950, when ] defined it '']'' in his Apostolic Constitution '']''.<ref name="Resch2016">{{cite book|author=Dustin Resch|title=Barth's Interpretation of the Virgin Birth: A Sign of Mystery|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CSPtCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA171|date=8 April 2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-17611-4|page=171}}</ref> The ] itself interprets ] of the ] as referring to it.<ref>Apostolic Constitution, ''Munificentissimus Deus'', para 27, Vaticsn (1950)</ref> The earliest known narrative is the so-called ''Liber Requiei Mariae'' (''The Book of Mary's Repose''), which survives intact only in an ] translation.<ref>Stephen J. Shoemaker, Ancient Traditions of the ''Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption''</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-ancient-traditions-of-the-virgin-marys-dormition-and-assumption-9780199210749 |title=Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption |publisher=Oup.com |date=19 October 2006 |accessdate=20 August 2018 }}</ref><ref>(Oxford: ], 2002, 2006). A complete translation of this earliest text appears at pp.&nbsp;290–350</ref> Probably composed by the 4th century, this Christian ]l narrative may be as early as the 3rd century. Also quite early are the very different traditions of the ''"Six Books" Dormition narratives''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/Syriac/Six%20Books%20Wright.pdf |title="Six Books" Dormition narratives |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090324201212/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/Syriac/Six%20Books%20Wright.pdf |archivedate=24 March 2009 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> The earliest versions of this apocryphon are preserved in several ] manuscripts of the 5th and 6th centuries, although the text itself probably belongs to the 4th century.<ref>William Wright, ''"The Departure of my Lady Mary from this World,"''</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/Syriac/Six%20Books%20Wright.pdf |title=The Departure of my Lady Mary from this World, |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090324201212/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/Syriac/Six%20Books%20Wright.pdf |archivedate=24 March 2009 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>''The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record'', 6 (1865): 417–48 and 7 (1865): 108–60. See also Agnes Smith Lewis, ed., Apocrypha Syriaca, Studia Sinaitica, XI (London: C. J. Clay and Sons, 1902).</ref>
], ], ]]]


Pope Pius XII expressed in his encyclical '']'' the hope that the belief in the bodily assumption of the virgin Mary into heaven "will make our belief in our own resurrection stronger and render it more effective",<ref>''Munificentissimus Deus'', No. 42</ref> while the ] adds: "The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a singular participation in her Son's Resurrection and an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians."<ref>{{cite book |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church #966 |url=http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p123a9p6.htm |access-date=13 August 2024}}</ref>
Later apocrypha based on these earlier texts include the ''De Obitu S. Dominae'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionG2/dormitionG2.htm |title=De Obitu S. Dominae |publisher=Uoregon.edu |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831092509/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionG2/dormitionG2.htm |archivedate=31 August 2009 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> attributed to ], a work probably from around the turn of the 6th century that is a summary of the "Six Books" narrative. The story also appears in ''De Transitu Virginis'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL1.htm |title=De Transitu Virginis |publisher=Uoregon.edu |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090413212601/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL1.htm |archivedate=13 April 2009 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> a late 5th-century work ascribed to ] that presents a theologically redacted summary of the traditions in the ''Liber Requiei Mariae''. The ''Transitus Mariae'' tells the story of the apostles being transported by white clouds to the deathbed of Mary, each from the town where he was preaching at the hour.
The '']'' in the 490s declared some ''transitus Mariae'' literature apocryphal.


==Traditions relating to the Assumption==
An Armenian letter attributed to ] also mentioned the supposed event, although this was written sometime after the 6th century. ], from this period, is the first church authority to advocate the doctrine under his own name. His contemporaries, ] and ], helped promote the concept to the wider church.
In some versions of the assumption narrative, the assumption is said to have taken place in ], in the ]. This is a much more recent and localised tradition. The earliest traditions say that Mary's life ended in ] (see ]).<ref>{{cite web |last1=Meistermann |first1=B. |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |website=www.newadvent.org |publisher=New York: Robert Appleton Company |access-date=10 September 2024}}</ref>


In some versions of the story, the event is said to have taken place in ], in the ]. This is a much more recent and localized tradition. The earliest traditions say that Mary's life ended in ] (see "]"). By the 7th century, a variation emerged, according to which one of the apostles, often identified as ], was not present at the death of Mary but his late arrival precipitates a reopening of Mary's tomb, which is found to be empty except for her grave clothes. In a later tradition, Mary drops ] down to the apostle from heaven as testament to the event.<ref>, vol. 8 page 594</ref> This incident is depicted in many later paintings of the Assumption. According to the ''Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary'', attributed to ], which is a later version of the Virgin Mary's Dormition, probably from sometime after the early seventh century, one of the apostles, often identified as ], was not present at the death of Mary but his late arrival precipitates a reopening of Mary's tomb, which is found to be empty except for her grave clothes.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Shoemaker |first1=Stephen J. |title=(Ps.-)Joseph of Arimathea, The Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL3.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090413212605/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL3.htm |access-date=10 September 2024|archive-date=13 April 2009 }}</ref> Finally, Mary drops ] down to the apostle from heaven as testament to the event.<ref>Ante-Nicene Fathers. , vol. 8 p. 594</ref> This incident is depicted in many later paintings of the Assumption.


Teaching of the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world, having been celebrated as early as the 5th century and having been established in the East by Emperor Maurice around AD 600.<ref name=Alban140 >''Butler's Lives of the Saints'' by Alban Butler, Paul Burns 1998 {{ISBN|0860122573}} pp. 140–141</ref> St. John Damascene records the following: Teaching of the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world, having been celebrated as early as the 5th century and having been established in the East by ] around AD 600.<ref name=Alban140 >Alban Butler, Paul Burns (1998). ''Butler's Lives of the Saints''. {{ISBN|0860122573}}. pp. 140–141</ref> In a ], ] (675–749 AD), citing the third book of the ], records the following:


{{quote|St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), made known to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened upon the request of St. Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that the body was taken up to heaven.<ref> ''More on the Assumption of Mary'' by Fr. William Saunders, EWTN</ref>}} {{blockquote|], Bishop of Jerusalem, at the ] (451), made known to the ] and ], who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened upon the request of ], was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that the body was taken up to heaven.<ref>William Saunders (1996). . EWTN. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190616130231/http://www.ewtn.com/faith/teachings/maryc3c.htm|date=16 June 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Dormition of the Mother of God Saint Joseph Orthodox Church |url=https://stjosephorthodox.org/2023/08/the-dormition-of-the-mother-of-god/ |access-date=13 August 2024}}</ref>}}


==History==
The Assumption of Mary was celebrated in the West under ] in the 8th century and ] confirmed the feast as official.<ref name=Alban140 /> Theological debate about the Assumption continued, following the Reformation. But the people celebrated the Assumption as part of the cult of Mary that flourished from the Middle Ages. In 1950 Pope ] defined it as dogma for the ].<ref name="Vatican-deus_en">{{cite web|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |title=Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus, no 44 |publisher=Vatican.va |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |archivedate=4 September 2013 }}</ref> Catholic theologian ] stated, "The idea of the bodily assumption of Mary is first expressed in certain transitus-narratives of the fifth and sixth centuries.&nbsp;... The first Church author to speak of the bodily assumption of Mary, in association with an apocryphal transitus B.M.V., is St. Gregory of Tours."<ref>Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (Rockford: Tan, 1974), pp. 209–210</ref> The ] writer ] states that "there is, clearly, no historical evidence whatever for it."<ref>Eamon Duffy, ''What Catholics Believe About Mary'' (London: Catholic Truth Society, 1989), p. 17</ref> However, the Catholic Church has never asserted nor denied that its teaching is based on the apocryphal accounts. The Church documents are silent on this matter and instead rely upon other sources and arguments as the basis for the doctrine.
], ], 1526–1530]]


Some scholars argue that the Dormition and Assumption traditions can be traced early in church history in the apocryphal books, with ] stating: {{blockquote|For instance, Baldi, Masconi, and Cothenet analyzed the corpus of Dormition narratives using a rather different approach, governed primarily by language tradition rather than literary relations, and yet all agree that the Obsequies (i.e., the {{lang|la|Liber Requiei Mariae}}) and the ''Six Books Dormition Apocryphon'' reflect the earliest traditions, locating their origins in the second or third century.<ref name="Academia">{{cite web |last1=Shoemaker |first1=Stephen |title=The Ancient Dormition Apocrypha and the Origins of Marian Piety: Early Evidence of Marian Intercession from Late Ancient Palestine (uncorrected page proofs) |url=https://www.academia.edu/10040859}}</ref>}}
Psychologist ], who was deeply interested in archetypes and comparative religion, celebrated that the Catholic Church had officially elevated the Virgin Mary (whom he noted as symbolizing the feminine principle) to standing with three masculine figures in the panoply of the church. (Jung: "Answer to Job") {{citation needed|date=October 2017}}


According to Shoemaker, the first known narrative to address the end of Mary's life and her assumption is the ]l third- and possibly second-century {{lang|la|Liber Requiei Mariae}} ("The Book of Mary's Repose").{{sfn|Shoemaker|2016|p=24}} Yet numerous features indicate that the ''Liber Requiei Mariae'', or the ''Obsequies of the Virgin'', as the text is called in Syriac, is even older than this ancient manuscript alone would suggest.<ref name="Academia"/>
==Catholic teaching==
{{Catholic marian prayers sidebar}}


Another early source that speaks of the Assumption is the "''Six Books Dormition Apocryphon''", so- called on account of its division into six separate books. It dates almost certainly to the middle of the fourth century, if not perhaps even earlier. {{sfn|Shoemaker|2016|p=25}} Most significantly, the ''Six Books Dormition Apocryphon'' provides compelling evidence for an early cult of the Virgin nearly a century before the events of the Council of Ephesus.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2016|p=25}}
===Dogmatic definition===
On 1 November 1950, in the Apostolic Constitution '']'' Pope ] declared the Assumption of Mary as a dogma:


''The Greek Discourse on the Dormition'' or ''The Book of John Concerning the Falling Asleep of Mary'' (attributed to ]), is another anonymous narrative, and may even precede the ''Book of Mary's Repose''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.revistateologica.ro/wp-content/uploads/RT-4-2021.pdf|title=Patrick Truglia, "Original Sin in The Byzantine Dormition Narratives" Revista Teologica, Issue 4 (2021): 9 (Footnote 30).}}</ref> This Greek document, is dated by ] as no later than the 4th century.<ref>"Apocrypha of the New Testament", 'Introductory Notice to the Apocrypha of the New Testament, Vol 8, ''The Ante-Nicene Fathers''.</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Philip Schaff: ANF08. The Twelve Patriarchs, Excerpts and Epistles, The Clementia, Apocrypha, Decretals, Memoirs of Edessa and Syriac Documents, Remains of the First Age - Christian Classics Ethereal Library |url=https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08/anf08.vii.xlii.html |website=ccel.org |access-date=14 August 2024}}</ref> but is dated by Shoemaker as later.<ref>Patrick Truglia, , ''Revista Teologica'', Issue 4 (2021): 9 (Footnote 30).</ref>
{{quote|By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority, we pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.<ref>Apostolic Constitution '']'' {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |date=4 September 2013 }}</ref>}}


The New Testament is silent regarding the end of her life. In the late 4th century ] wrote he could find no authorized tradition about how her life ended.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|pp=11–12, 26}} Nevertheless, although Epiphanius could not decide on the basis of biblical or church tradition whether Mary had died or remained immortal, his indecisive reflections suggest that some difference of opinion on the matter had already arisen in his time,{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|p=14}} and he identified three beliefs concerning her end: that she had a normal and peaceful death; that she died as a martyr; or that she did not die.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|p=14}} Even more, in another text Epiphanius stated that Mary was like ] because she never died but was assumed, like him.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J. (2008). . ''Journal of Early Christian Studies'' 16 (3): 371–401. {{ISSN|1086-3184}}.</ref>
Pope Pius XII deliberately left open the question of whether Mary died before her Assumption.<ref></ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/NICAEA2.HTM#2 |title=Nicaea II Definition, "without blemish" |publisher=Ewtn.com |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013}}</ref>


Other works that mention the assumption of Mary are the apocryphal treatise {{lang|la|De Obitu S. Dominae}}, bearing the name of St. John, which belongs however to the fourth or fifth century. It is also found in the apocryphal book {{lang|la|De Transitus Beatae Mariae Virginis}}, falsely ascribed to ], and in a spurious letter attributed to ].<ref name="NewAdvent">{{cite book |last1=Holweck |first1=Frederick |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Assumption of Mary |date=1907 |publisher=New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907 |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02006b.htm |access-date=30 July 2024}}</ref> {{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|p=213}}
Before the dogmatic definition, in '']'' Pope Pius XII sought the opinion of Catholic Bishops. A large number of them pointed to the ] (]) as scriptural support for the dogma.<ref name=IntroM75/> In '']'' (item 39) Pius XII referred to the "struggle against the infernal foe" as in Genesis 3:15 and to "complete victory over the sin and death" as in the ] as a scriptural basis for the dogmatic definition, Mary being assumed to heaven as in ]: "then shall come to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory".<ref name="IntroM75"/><ref name="Mariology pages 328-350"/><ref name="item 39at the Vatican web site"/>


The '']'', from the sixth century, is cited by John of Damascus, which narrates how Mary was assumed into heaven.<ref name=JW>John Wortley, "The Marian Relics at Constantinople", ''Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies'' '''45''' (2005), pp. 171–187, esp. 181–182.</ref>
===Theological issues===
], Mexico.]]
In Pius XII's dogmatic statement, the phrase "having completed the course of her earthly life", leaves open the question of whether the Virgin Mary died before her assumption or not. Mary's assumption is said to have been a divine gift to her as the 'Mother of God'. Ludwig Ott's view is that, as Mary completed her life as a shining example to the human race, the perspective of the gift of assumption is offered to the whole human race.<ref>Ludwig Ott's ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'', pp. 250 ff.</ref>


] set out what had become the standard Eastern tradition, that "Mary died in the presence of the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened, upon the request of St Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that her body was taken up to heaven."{{sfn|Jenkins|2015|p=unpaginated}}
Ludwig Ott writes in his book ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'' that "the fact of her death is almost generally accepted by the Fathers and Theologians, and is expressly affirmed in the Liturgy of the Church", to which he adds a number of helpful citations. He concludes: "for Mary, death, in consequence of her freedom from ] and from personal sin, was not a consequence of punishment of sin. However, it seems fitting that Mary's body, which was by nature mortal, should be, in conformity with that of her ], subject to the general law of death".<ref name=Ott6>''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma,'' Ludwig Ott, Book III, Pt. 3, Ch. 2, §6, {{ISBN|0-89555-009-1}}</ref>


The ], arrived in the West in the early 7th century, its name changing to Assumption in some 9th century liturgical calendars.{{sfn|Warner|2016|p=91}} The feast was decreed for ] on 15 August by the ] in 600; about fifty years later it was introduced in ] and is mentioned in a papal decree of ] (687-701), who fixed a procession for the feast.<ref>{{cite book |last1=O'Carroll |first1=Michael |title=Theotokos: A Theological Encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary |date=1983 |publisher=Glazier |isbn=978-0-907271-11-6 |page=55-57 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t_MQAQAAIAAJ |access-date=27 October 2024 |language=en}}</ref> ] (reigned 847–855) gave the feast a vigil and an octave to solemnise it above all others, ] (858–867) placed it on a par with ] and ], and ] (1740–1758) declared it "a probable opinion, which to deny were impious and blasphemous".{{sfn|Wagner|2020|p=95}}
The point of her bodily death has not been infallibly defined by any pope. Many Catholics believe that she did not die at all, but was assumed directly into Heaven. The dogmatic definition within the Apostolic Constitution '']'' which, according to Roman Catholic dogma, infallibly proclaims the doctrine of the Assumption leaves open the question of whether, in connection with her departure, Mary underwent bodily death. It does not dogmatically define the point one way or the other, as shown by the words "having completed the course of her earthly life".<ref name = "Vatican-deus_en" />

Scholars of the {{lang|la|]}} "argued that during or shortly after the apostolic age a group of Jewish Christians in Jerusalem preserved an oral tradition about the end of the Virgin's life". Thus, by pointing to oral tradition, they argued for the historicity of the assumption and Dormition narratives. According to ] "the strikingly diverse traditions of Mary's Dormition and Assumption arise from ‘a great variety of original types’, rather than being the result of a progressive modification of a single, original tradition". ] and his predecessors have argued that belief in the Virgin's Assumption is the final dogmatic development, rather than the point of origin, of these traditions.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|pp=18–20}}

There is a large number of accounts of assumption of the Virgin Mary, published in various languages (including Greek, Latin, Coptic, Syriac, Ethiopic, Arabic). The standard Greek text is the one attributed to St John the Theologian (Evangelist). The standard Latin is that attributed
to Melito of Sardis.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Elliott |first1=J. K. |title=The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation |date=27 October 2005 |publisher=OUP Oxford |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-826181-0 |page=691 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fHXnCwAAQBAJ |access-date=15 August 2024 |language=en}}</ref> Shoemaker mentions that "the ancient narratives are neither clear nor unanimous in either supporting or contradicting the dogma" of the assumption.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|p=3}}


===Scriptural basis=== ===Scriptural basis===
{{see also|Mary, mother of Jesus#After the Ascension of Jesus}} {{see also|Mary, mother of Jesus#After the Ascension of Jesus}}
]
In '']'', near the end of the review of the doctrine's history, Pope ] stated : "All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation." Precedent to this, he cited many passages that have been offered in support of this teaching.


The apostolic constitution {{lang|la|]}} mentions several Holy Fathers, theologians and ] who held the Assumption of Mary, among them are ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] (Angelic Doctor), ] (Seraphic Doctor), ], ], ], ], ], among others.<ref name="auto"/> The apostolic constitution adds: "All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation."
The pope cited {{Bibleref2|1 Corinthians 15}}. In this passage Paul alludes to {{Bibleref2|Genesis 3:15}} (in addition to the primary reference of {{Bibleref2|Psalm 8:6}}), where it is prophesied that the ] will crush Satan with his feet: "I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel." Since, then, Jesus arose to Heaven to fulfill this prophecy, it follows that the woman would have a similar end, since she shared this enmity with Satan.


Father Jugie, expressed the view that ]:1–2 was the chief scriptural witness to the assumption:{{sfn|O'Carroll|2000|p=56}}
The pope also mentioned (in paragraph 26) {{Bibleref2|Psalm 132}}, a psalm commemorating the return of the Ark of God to Jerusalem and lamenting its subsequent loss. The second half of the psalm says that the loss will be recompensed in the New Covenant, and so it is hopefully prayed, "Arise, O Lord, into thy resting place: thou and the ark, which thou hast sanctified" (v. 8). Since the Church sees this New Covenant ark in Mary, it understands that she was taken into Heaven in the same manner as the Lord – that is, body and soul.


{{blockquote|And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; and she was with child&nbsp;...|]}}
Finally, he mentioned in the next paragraph "that woman clothed with the sun whom John the Apostle contemplated on the Island of Patmos" was support for the creating this dogmatic doctrine for Catholics.


This passage, Epiphanius proposes, may indicate that Mary did not die as other human beings, but somehow remained immortal, although he makes clear his own uncertainty and refrains from advocating this view. Ultimately Epiphanius concludes: " am not saying that she remained immortal. But neither am I affirming that she died."{{sfn|Shoemaker|2002|p=12}}
==Assumption vs. Dormition==
]).]]


Since the time of the early Church Fathers, this image of "the woman clothed with the sun" has had a threefold symbolism: the ancient people of Israel, the Church and Mary.<ref name="Rev12">{{cite web |url=http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0769.html |last=Saunder |first=William |title=Woman Clothed with the Sun |website=Arlington Catholic Herald |year=2004 |publisher=Catholic Education Resource Center |access-date=July 6, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130713052830/http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0769.html |archive-date=July 13, 2013}}</ref>
The ] Feast of the Assumption is celebrated on 15 August, and the ] and ] celebrate the ] (the falling asleep of the Mother of God) on the same date, preceded by a 14-day ] period. Eastern Christians believe that Mary died a natural death, that her soul was received by Christ upon death, and that her body was resurrected on the third day after her death and that she was taken up into heaven bodily in anticipation of the general ]. Her tomb was found empty on the third day.


Many of the bishops cited ], in which God is addressing ] in the ], as the primary confirmation of Mary's assumption:{{sfn|Miravalle|2006|p=73}}
{{quote|Orthodox tradition is clear and unwavering in regard to the central point : the Holy Virgin underwent, as did her Son, a physical death, but her body – like His – was afterwards raised from the dead and she was taken up into heaven, in her body as well as in her soul. She has passed beyond death and judgement, and lives wholly in the Age to Come. The Resurrection of the Body ... has in her case been anticipated and is already an accomplished fact. That does not mean, however, that she is dissociated from the rest of humanity and placed in a wholly different category: for we all hope to share one day in that same glory of the Resurrection of the Body which she enjoys even now.<ref>Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, in: Festal Menaion , p. 64.</ref>}}


{{blockquote|I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.|{{bibleverse|Genesis|3:15}}}}
Many Catholics also believe that Mary first died before being assumed, but they believe that she was miraculously resurrected before being assumed. Others believe she was assumed bodily into Heaven without first dying.<ref>''The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions'' by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 {{ISBN|1-4022-0806-5}} p. 64</ref><ref>Shoemaker 2006, p. 201</ref> Either understanding may be legitimately held by Catholics, with ] observing the Feast as the Dormition.


Many scholars connect Jesus' usage of the word "woman" to call Mary instead of calling her "mother" as a confirmation of Mary being the "woman" described in Genesis 3:15. Mary was often seen as the "]", who crushed the serpent's head at the ] by obeying the ] when he said she would bear the ] (Luke 1:38).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Taylor |first=Edward K. |date=1961 |title=The Woman of Cana |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27658099 |journal=The Furrow |volume=12 |issue=5 |pages=304–310 |jstor=27658099 |issn=0016-3120}}</ref>
Many theologians note by way of comparison that in the Catholic Church, the Assumption is dogmatically defined, while in the Eastern Orthodox tradition, the Dormition is less dogmatically than liturgically and mystically defined. Such differences spring from a larger pattern in the two traditions, wherein Catholic teachings are often dogmatically and authoritatively defined – in part because of the more centralized structure of the Catholic Church – while in Eastern Orthodoxy, many doctrines are less authoritative.<ref>See "" by ], from the Medieval Sourcebook</ref>

The ] affirms that the account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, and that the fall of mankind, by the seductive voice of the snake in the Bible, represents the fallen angel, ] or "the devil".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Catechism of the Catholic Church – IntraText|url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM|access-date=2022-02-08|publisher=Holy See}}</ref> Similarly, the great dragon in ] is a representation of Satan, identified with the serpent from the garden who has enmity with the woman.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Williamson|first=Peter|title=Catholic Christian Commentary on Sacred Scripture: Revelation|publisher=Baker Academic|year=2015|isbn=978-0801036507|location=Grand Rapids, Michigan|pages=205–220|language=English}}</ref> Therefore, in Catholic thought, there is an association between this woman and Mary's Assumption.

Among the many other passages noted by Pope Pius XII were the following:{{sfn|Miravalle|2006|p=73}}
* ] ({{bibleverse|Psalm|132:8}}), greeting the return of the ] to Jerusalem ("Arise, O Lord, into your resting place, you and the ark which you have sanctified!"), where the ark is taken as the prophetic "type" of Mary;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://udayton.edu/imri/mary/a/assumption-of-mary-scriptural-support.php|title=Assumption of Mary: Scriptural Support |publisher=University of Dayton, Ohio}}</ref>
* ]:19, in which John sees the Ark of the Covenant in heaven (this verse immediately precedes the vision of the woman clothed with the sun);
* ]:28, in which the ] greets Mary with the words, "Hail Mary, full of grace", since Mary's bodily assumption is a natural consequence of being full of grace;
* ] ({{bibleverse|1 Corinthians|15:23}}) and ] ({{bibleverse|Matthew|27:52–53}}), concerning the certainty of bodily resurrection for all who have faith in Jesus.
The Bible mentions two prominent figures, ] and ], who were taken up to heaven, serving as important precedents for the assumption of Mary. Enoch, referenced in the Book of ], is noted for his intimate walk with God and is described as having been "taken" by God ({{bibleverse|Genesis|5:24}}), an event that is also reported in the Epistle to the ] ({{bibleverse|Hebrews|11:5}}). Similarly, Elijah, the great prophet, was taken up to heaven in a whirlwind, accompanied by a chariot of fire, as recorded in ] ({{bibleverse|2 Kings|2:11}}).

=== Catholic marian visionaries and the Assumption ===
In the 12th century, the German nun ] was reportedly granted visions of Mary and her son which had a profound influence on the Western Church's tradition. In her work ''Visio de resurrectione beate virginis Mariae'' relates how Mary was assumed in body and soul into Heaven.{{sfn|Warner|2016|p=91}} <ref>{{cite book |last1=Clark |first1=Anne L. |title=Elisabeth of Schönau: a twelfth-century visionary |date=1992 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |location=Philadelphia |isbn=9780812231236 |page=382 }}</ref>

On 1 May 1950 ] (a marian seer) reported to ] a presumed message that the Virgin Mary would have ordered him to communicate to the pope on the dogma of the Assumption of the Holy Virgin Mary. It is said that ] asked God, during the Holy Year of 1950, for a sign that could reassure him that the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary was actually wanted by God and when Gilles communicated the message to Pius XII, the pope considered this message the hoped-for sign. Six months after the private audience granted to Gilles by the pope, Pius XII himself proclaimed the dogma of the Assumption of body and soul of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gilles Bouhours |url=http://www.santiebeati.it/dettaglio/95785 |access-date=2023-08-15 |website=Santiebeati.it}}</ref>

==Assumption versus Dormition==
{{See also|Dormition of the Mother of God}}
])]]

Some Catholics believe that Mary died before being assumed, but they believe that she was miraculously resurrected before being assumed (mortalistic interpretation). Others believe she was assumed bodily into Heaven without first dying (immortalistic interpretation).<ref>''The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions'' by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 {{ISBN|1402208065}} p. 64</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shoemaker|2016|p=201}}</ref> Either understanding may be legitimately held by Catholics, with ] observing the Feast as the Dormition. It seems, however, that there is much more evidence for the mortalistic position in the Catholic traditions (liturgy, apocrypha, material culture).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Witała |first=Maciej |date=2021-12-16 |title=Proposition of a Modern Theological Interpretation of Death as a Consequence of Sin |url=https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pst/article/view/30545 |journal=Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne |volume=39 |language=en |issue=39 |pages=40–41 |doi=10.14746/pst.2021.39.02 |issn=2451-2273 |doi-access=free}}</ref> ] expressed the mortalistic position in his public speech.<ref>{{Cite web |last=John Paul II |title=General Audience 25 June 1997 |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_25061997.html |access-date=2023-05-20 |website=www.vatican.va}}</ref>

Many theologians note by way of comparison that in the Catholic Church the Assumption is dogmatically defined, whilst in the Eastern Orthodox tradition the Dormition is less dogmatically than liturgically and mystically defined. Such differences spring from a larger pattern in the two traditions, wherein Catholic teachings are often dogmatically and authoritatively defined – in part because of the more centralized structure of the Catholic Church – whilst in Eastern Orthodoxy many doctrines are less authoritative.<ref>See "" by ], from the Medieval Sourcebook</ref>

The ] Feast of the Assumption is celebrated on 15 August and the ] and ] celebrate the Dormition of the Mother of God (or Dormition of the Theotokos, the falling asleep of the Mother of God) on the same date, preceded by a 14-day ] period. Eastern Christians believe that Mary died a natural death, that her soul was received by Christ upon death, that her body was resurrected after her death and that she was taken up into heaven bodily in anticipation of the general ].

{{blockquote|Orthodox tradition is clear and unwavering in regard to the central point : the Holy Virgin underwent, as did her Son, a physical death, but her body – like His – was afterwards raised from the dead and she was taken up into heaven, in her body as well as in her soul. She has passed beyond death and judgement and lives wholly in the Age to Come. The Resurrection of the Body ... has in her case been anticipated and is already an accomplished fact. That does not mean, however, that she is dissociated from the rest of humanity and placed in a wholly different category: for we all hope to share one day in that same glory of the Resurrection of the Body that she enjoys even now.<ref>Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, in: Festal Menaion , p. 64.</ref>}}


==Protestant views== ==Protestant views==
], 1626]]
Views differ within Protestantism, with those with a theology closer to Catholicism sometimes believing in a bodily assumption, while most Protestants do not.

Views differ within Protestantism, with those with a theology closer to Catholicism sometimes believing in a bodily assumption whilst most Protestants do not.

===Lutheran views===
The Feast of the Assumption of Mary was retained by the ] after the ].<ref name="Beane2019">{{cite web |last= Beane |first= Larry |title= The Feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary |website= Gottesdienst.org |language= English |date=15 August 2019 |quote= Many early Lutherans retained the Feast of the Assumption in the liturgical calendar, while recognizing it as a speculation rather than a dogma. However, Pope Pius XII dogmatized this belief in 1950 in his decree ''Munificentissimus Dei'' (sic), thus imposing it as doctrine upon Roman Catholics. ... Today's feast is described in Lutheran Service Book as 'St. Mary, Mother of our Lord'. |url= https://www.gottesdienst.org/gottesblog/2019/8/15/the-feast-of-the-blessed-virgin-mary |access-date= 27 May 2021 }}</ref> ] designates August 15 as a lesser festival named "Mary, Mother of Our Lord" while the current ] formally calls it "St. Mary, Mother of our Lord".<ref name="Beane2019"/>


===Anglican views=== ===Anglican views===
Within ], the Assumption of Mary is either rejected, or regarded as ] ("a thing indifferent");<ref>Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the ''adiaphora''."</ref> it therefore disappeared from Anglican worship in 1549, partially returning in some branches of Anglicanism during the 20th century under different names. A Marian feast on 15 August is celebrated by the ] as a non-specific ] of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a feast called by the ] simply "Mary the Virgin",<ref name="Williams, Paul 2007 p. 253">Williams, Paul (2007). p. 253, incl. note 54.</ref><ref>The Church of England, official website: . Accessed 17 July 2018</ref><ref>The Scottish Episcopal Church, official website: . Accessed 17 July 2018</ref> and in the US-based ] it is observed as the feast of "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ",<ref>{{cite web |author= The Episcopal Church |url= https://www.episcopalchurch.org/lectionary/saint-mary-virgin-mother-our-lord-jesus-christ |title= Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ |work= Liturgical Calendar |publisher= The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, The Episcopal Church |location= New York |accessdate=17 July 2018}}</ref> Within ] the Assumption of Mary is accepted by some, rejected by others, or regarded as ] ("a thing indifferent").<ref>Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the ''adiaphora''."</ref> The doctrine effectively disappeared from Anglican worship in 1549, partially returning in ] tradition during the 20th century under different names. A Marian feast on 15 August is celebrated by the ] as a non-specific ] of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a feast called by the ] simply "Mary the Virgin",<ref name="Williams, Paul 2007 p. 253">Williams, Paul (2007). p. 253, incl. note 54.</ref><ref>The Church of England, official website: . Accessed 17 July 2018</ref><ref>The Scottish Episcopal Church, official website: . Accessed 17 July 2018</ref> and in the US-based ] it is observed as the feast of "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ",<ref>{{cite web |author= The Episcopal Church |url= https://www.episcopalchurch.org/lectionary/saint-mary-virgin-mother-our-lord-jesus-christ |title= Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ |work= Liturgical Calendar |publisher= The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, The Episcopal Church |location= New York |access-date= 17 July 2018 |archive-date= 17 July 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180717153916/https://www.episcopalchurch.org/lectionary/saint-mary-virgin-mother-our-lord-jesus-christ |url-status= dead }}</ref>
while other Anglican provinces have a feast of the Dormition<ref name="Williams, Paul 2007 p. 253"/> – the ] for instance marks the day as the "Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary",<ref name="PrayerBook">{{cite web |url= http://prayerbook.ca/the-prayer-book-online/57-the-calendar-ix |title= The Calendar |page= ix |publisher=Prayerbook.ca |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20131104172841/http://prayerbook.ca/the-prayer-book-online/57-the-calendar-ix |archivedate=4 November 2013 }}</ref> while other Anglican provinces have a feast of the Dormition<ref name="Williams, Paul 2007 p. 253"/> – the ]'s Book of Common Prayer (1962), for instance, marks the day as the "Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary".<ref name="PrayerBook">{{cite web |url= http://prayerbook.ca/the-prayer-book-online/57-the-calendar-ix |title= The Calendar |page= ix |publisher=Prayerbook.ca |access-date=3 November 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131104172841/http://prayerbook.ca/the-prayer-book-online/57-the-calendar-ix |archive-date=4 November 2013 }}</ref>


The ], which seeks to identify common ground between the two communions, released in 2004 an non-authoritative declaration meant for study and evaluation, the "Seattle Statement"; this "agreed statement" concludes that "the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the ], understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions".<ref name="ARCIC">{{cite web |url= http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/angl-comm-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20050516_mary-grace-hope-christ_en.html |title= Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ |publisher= Vatican.va |date= 26 June 2000 |quote= There is no direct testimony in Scripture concerning the end of Mary’s life. However, certain passages give instances of those who follow God's purposes faithfully being drawn into God's presence. Moreover, these passages offer hints or partial analogies that may throw light on the mystery of Mary's entry into glory. |accessdate= 3 November 2013}}</ref> The ], which seeks to identify common ground between the two communions, released in 2004 a non-authoritative declaration meant for study and evaluation, the "Seattle Statement"; this "agreed statement" concludes that "the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the ], understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions".<ref name="ARCIC">{{cite web |url= https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/angl-comm-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20050516_mary-grace-hope-christ_en.html |title= Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ |publisher= Vatican.va |date= 26 June 2000 |quote= There is no direct testimony in Scripture concerning the end of Mary’s life. However, certain passages give instances of those who follow God's purposes faithfully being drawn into God's presence. Moreover, these passages offer hints or partial analogies that may throw light on the mystery of Mary's entry into glory. |access-date= 3 November 2013}}</ref>


===Other Protestant views=== ===Other Protestant views===
The Protestant reformer ] believed in the assumption of Mary. His 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry<ref>''De origine erroris libri duo'' . "In the {{lang|la|De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu}} he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the {{lang|la|De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae}} he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in ] (Zurich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work."
](1516–1518).]]
The Protestant Reformer ] believed in the assumption of Mary. His 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry<ref>''De origine erroris libri duo'' (On the Origin of Error, Two Books) . "In the ''De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu'' he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the ''De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae'' he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in ] (Zurich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work."


''The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (c. 1540–1617)'', Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, {{ISBN|951-41-0944-9|9789514109447}}, p. 175 ''The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (c. 1540–1617)'', Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, {{ISBN|978-9514109447}}, p. 175
</ref> expressed his belief that Mary's ''sacrosanctum corpus'' ("sacrosanct body") had been assumed into heaven by angels: </ref> expressed his belief that Mary's {{lang|la|sacrosanctum corpus}} ("sacrosanct body") had been assumed into heaven by angels:


{{quote|''Hac causa credimus ut Deiparae virginis Mariae purissimum thalamum et spiritus sancti templum, hoc est, sacrosanctum corpus ejus deportatum esse ab angelis in coelum.''<ref>Froschauer. ''De origine erroris'', Caput XVI (Chapter 16), p. 70</ref> {{verse translation|lang=la|Hac causa credimus ut Deiparae virginis Mariae purissimum thalamum et spiritus sancti templum, hoc est, sacrosanctum corpus ejus deportatum esse ab angelis in coelum.<ref>Froschauer. ''De origine erroris'', Caput XVI (Chapter 16), p. 70</ref>
|For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.<ref>''The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary'' (1996), ], Liturgical Press {{ISBN|978-0814659144}}, p. 109. </ref>}}


==Feasts and related fasting period==
For this reason, we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.<ref>''The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary'' (1996), ], Liturgical Press {{ISBN|0-8146-5914-4|9780814659144}}, p. 109. </ref>}}
]}} in August]]
Orthodox Christians fast for fourteen days before the Feast of the Assumption of Mary, including abstinence from sexual relations.<ref name="Menzel2014">{{cite news |last1=Menzel |first1=Konstantinos |title=Abstaining From Sex Is Part of Fasting |newspaper=Greekreporter.com |url=https://greekreporter.com/2014/04/14/abstaining-from-sex-is-part-of-fasting/ |publisher=] |access-date=27 May 2021 |language=English |date=14 April 2014}}</ref> Fasting in the Orthodox Churches generally consists of abstinence from certain food groups; during the Dormition fast, one observes a strict fast on weekdays, with wine and oil allowed on weekends and, additionally, fish on the Transfiguration (August 6).<ref>{{cite web | url=http://ww1.antiochian.org/1157652263 | title=The Fasting Seasons &#124; Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese }}{{dead link|date=November 2024}}</ref>


The Assumption is important to many Christians, especially Catholics and Orthodox, as well as many Lutherans and Anglicans, as the Virgin Mary's heavenly birthday (the day that Mary was received into Heaven). Belief about her acceptance into the glory of Heaven is seen by some Christians as the symbol of the promise made by Jesus to all enduring Christians that they too will be received into paradise. The Assumption of Mary is symbolised in the ] Madonna.
Most modern Protestants neither teach nor believe in the Assumption of Mary, as they see no ] or extra-biblical basis for it. Although many churches within ] do not teach the Assumption of Mary, 15 August remains a Lesser Feast in celebration of "Mary, Mother of Our Lord", according to the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.liturgybytlw.com/LessFest/MaryMoth.html |title=Mary, Mother of Our Lord |publisher=Liturgybytlw.com |date= |accessdate=3 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wmltblog.org/2011/08/st-mary-mother-of-our-lord/ |title=St. Mary, Mother of Our Lord |publisher=Wmltblog.org |date=15 August 2011 |accessdate=3 November 2013}}</ref>


The present Italian name of the holiday, {{lang|it|]}}, may derive from the Latin name, {{lang|it|Feriae Augusti}} ("Holidays of the ]"),<ref name="Pianigiani">{{cite web |author=Pianigiani, Ottorino|title=Vocabolario etimologico della lingua italiana|year=1907|url=http://www.etimo.it/?term=ferragosto}}</ref> since the month of August took its name from the emperor. The feast was introduced by Bishop ] in the 5th century. In the course of ], he put it on 15 August. In the middle of August, Augustus celebrated his victories over ] and ] at ] and ] with a three-day ]. The anniversaries (and later only 15 August) were public holidays from then on throughout the Roman Empire.<ref>{{cite book |last=Giebel |first=Marion |author-link= |date=1984 |title=Augustus |url= |location=Reinbek bei Hamburg |publisher=Rowohlt |page=6 |isbn=3499503271}}</ref>
==Feasts==
] in August]]


The Solemnity of the Assumption on 15 August was celebrated in the ] from the 6th century. The ] adopted this date as a ] to commemorate the Assumption of the ], a reference to the belief in a real, physical elevation of her sinless soul and incorrupt body into Heaven.
The Assumption is important to many Catholic and Orthodox Christians as the Virgin Mary's heavenly birthday (the day that Mary was received into Heaven). Belief about her acceptance into the glory of Heaven is seen by some Christians as the symbol of the promise made by Jesus to all enduring Christians that they too will be received into paradise. The Assumption of Mary is symbolised in the ] Madonna.

The present Italian name of the holiday, ''"Ferragosto"'', may derive from the Latin name, ''Feriae Augusti'' ("Holidays of the ]"),<ref name="Pianigiani">{{cite web |author=Pianigiani, Ottorino|title=Vocabolario etimologico della lingua italiana|year=1907|url=http://www.etimo.it/?term=ferragosto}}</ref> since the month of August took its name from the emperor. The Solemnity of the Assumption on 15 August was celebrated in the eastern Church from the 6th Century. The ] adopted this date as a ] to commemorate the Assumption of the ], a reference to the belief in a real, physical elevation of her sinless soul and incorrupt body into Heaven.


===Public holidays=== ===Public holidays===
{{more citations needed|section|date=August 2017}}<!--only first paragraph has a citation--> {{more citations needed|section|date=August 2017}}
]}} (sweet rice cakes) are the {{lang|fr|pièce de résistance}} of the Assumption feast celebration among ].]]
Assumption Day on 15 August is a nationwide public holiday in Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chile, Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, East Timor, France, Gabon, Greece, Georgia, Republic of Guinea, Haiti, Italy, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Mauritius, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro (Albanian Catholics), Paraguay, Poland (Polish Army Day), Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tahiti, Togo, and Vanuatu;<ref name="ReferenceA">''Columbus World Travel Guide'', 25th Edition</ref> and was also in ] until ].


Assumption Day on 15 August is a nationwide public holiday in Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chile, Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2019_11_110_2212.html |title=Zakon o blagdanima, spomendanima i neradnim danima u Republici Hrvatskoj |work=Narodne novine |date=14 November 2019 |access-date=28 August 2024|language=hr}}</ref> Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, East Timor, France, Gabon, Greece, Georgia, Republic of Guinea, Haiti, Italy, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of North Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Mauritius, Monaco, Montenegro (Albanian Catholics), Paraguay, Philippines (Maragondon, Cavite),Poland (coinciding with Polish Army Day), Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tahiti, Togo, and Vanuatu;<ref name="ReferenceA">''Columbus World Travel Guide'', 25th ed.</ref> and was also in Hungary until 1948.
It is also a public holiday in parts of Germany (parts of ] and ]) and Switzerland (in 14 of the 26 ]). In Guatemala, it is observed in ] and in the town of ], both of which claim her as their ].<ref></ref> Also, this day is combined with ] in Costa Rica and parts of Belgium.


It is also a public holiday in parts of Germany (parts of ] and ]) and Switzerland (in 14 of the 26 ]) and Bosnia (the Croatian zone). In Guatemala, it is observed in ] and in the town of ], both of which claim her as their ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://hemisphericinstitute.org/journal/4.2/eng/en51_pg_reiland.html |last=Reiland |first=Catherine |title=To Heaven Through the Streets of Guatemala City: the Processions of the Virgin of the Assumption |work=Emisferica |access-date=11 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161222152928/http://hemisphericinstitute.org/journal/4.2/eng/en51_pg_reiland.html |archive-date=22 December 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Also, this day is combined with ] in Costa Rica and parts of Belgium.
Prominent Catholic and Orthodox countries in which Assumption Day is an important festival but is not recognized by the state as a public holiday include the ], ], ], the ] and ]. In ], the Feast of the Assumption is the biggest Orthodox Christian celebration of the Holy Virgin. Celebrations include liturgies and votive offerings. In Varna, the day is celebrated with a procession of a holy icon, and with concerts and regattas.<ref></ref>


Prominent Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox countries in which Assumption Day is an important festival but is not recognised by the state as a public holiday include the ], ], ], the ] and ]. In ], the Feast of the Assumption is the biggest Eastern Orthodox Christian celebration of the Holy Virgin. Celebrations include liturgies and votive offerings. In ], the day is celebrated with a procession of a holy icon, and with concerts and regattas.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bnr.bg/en/post/101007601/the-assumption-of-mary-into-heaven-the-most-revered-summer-orthodox-christian-feast-in-bulgaria|title=The Assumption of Mary into Heaven, the most revered summer Orthodox Christian feast in Bulgaria|website=bnr.bg}}</ref>
In many places, religious parades and popular festivals are held to celebrate this day. In Canada, Assumption Day is the Fête Nationale of the ]s, of whom she is the patron saint. Some businesses close on that day in heavily francophone parts of ], Canada. The Virgin Assumed in Heaven is also patroness of the ] and her feast, celebrated on 15 August, apart from being a public holiday in Malta is also celebrated with great solemnity in the local churches especially in the seven localities known as the Seba' Santa Marijiet. The hamlet of ] holds a festival during which its population swells from approximately 25 to 5000 people.


In many places, religious parades and popular festivals are held to celebrate this day. In Canada, Assumption Day is the Fête Nationale of the ]s, of whom she is the patroness saint. Some businesses close on that day in heavily francophone parts of ], Canada. The Virgin Assumed in Heaven is also patroness of the ] and her feast, celebrated on 15 August, apart from being a public holiday in Malta it is also celebrated with great solemnity in the local churches especially in the seven localities known as the Seba' Santa Marijiet. The Maltese localities which celebrate the Assumption of Our Lady are: Il-], Il-], ], ], Il-], Ħ'], ] and ]. The hamlet of ], holds a festival during which its population swells from approximately 25 to 5,000 people.
In ] and ], the feast is kept, but without official use of the word "Assumption". In Eastern Orthodox churches following the ], the feast day of Assumption of Mary falls on 28 August.

In ] and ], the feast is now often kept, but without official use of the word "Assumption". In Eastern Orthodox churches following the ], the feast day of Assumption of Mary falls on 28 August.

==Art==
{{main|Assumption of the Virgin Mary in art}}
The earliest known use of the Dormition is found on a sarcophagus in the crypt of a church in ] in Spain dated {{Circa|330|lk=no}}.{{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|p=213}} The Assumption became a popular subject in Western Christian art, especially from the 12th century, and especially after the ], when it was used to refute the Protestants and their downplaying of Mary's role in salvation.{{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|p=83}} Angels commonly carry her heavenward where she is to be crowned by Christ, while the Apostles below surround her empty tomb as they stare up in awe.{{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|p=83}} ], the "father" of the ] movement, caused a stir by depicting her as a decaying corpse, quite contrary to the doctrine promoted by the church;{{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|pp=213–214}} more orthodox examples include works by ], ], ], and ], the last replacing the Apostles with ] throwing flowers into the tomb.{{sfn|Zirpolo|2018|p=83}}


==See also== ==See also==
* ], a disambiguation page which includes many places named after the Assumption of Mary
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
===Citations===
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}


===Bibliography=== ===Bibliography===
* {{Cite book
* Shoemaker, Stephen J. (2002, 2006). . Oxford University Press, Oxford. {{ISBN|0-19-925075-8}} (Hardcover 2004, Reprint), {{ISBN|0-19-921074-8}} (Paperback 2006)
| last1 = Alter
* Williams, Paul (2007). ''The English Reformers and the Blessed Virgin Mary''. In Boss, Sarah Jane (editor): ''Mary: The Complete Resource''. Oxford University Press, , {{ISBN|978-0195333558}}, accessed 17 July 2018
| first1 = Robert
| title = Genesis: Translation and Commentary
| publisher = W. W. Norton & Company
| year = 1997
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=vR8R7X2G7G8C&q=serpent
| isbn = 978-0393070262
}}
* {{Cite book
| last1 = Arnold
| first1 = Bill T.
| title = Genesis
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| year = 2009
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ZfstnHO_AmgC&pg=PA69
| isbn = 978-0521000673
}}
* {{Cite book
| last1 = Beale
| first1 = G. K.
| last2 = Campbell
| first2 = David
| title = Revelation: A Shorter Commentary
| publisher = Eerdmans
| year = 2015
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=f5MfCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA243
| isbn = 978-0304707812
}}
* {{Cite book
| last = Boss
| first = Sarah Jane
| title = Empress and Handmaid: On Nature and Gender in the Cult of the Virgin Mary
| publisher = A&C Black
| year = 2000
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=wPWd4hICgDcC&pg=PA79
| isbn = 978-0304707812
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Collinge
| first1 = William J.
| title = Historical Dictionary of Catholicism
| publisher = Scarecrow Press
| year = 2012
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=L8C3TKNdn5oC&pg=PA53
| isbn = 978-0810879799
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Cross
| first1 = Frank Leslie
| last2 = Livingstone
| first2 = Elizabeth A.
| chapter = Assumption of the BVM
| title = The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2005
| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=fUqcAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA118
| isbn = 978-0192802903
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Duffy
| first = Eamon
| title = What Catholics Believe About Mary
| place = London
| publisher = Catholic Truth Society
| year = 1989
| url =
}}
* {{Cite book
| last = Ford
| first = John T.
| title = Saint Mary's Press Glossary of Theological Terms
| publisher = Saint Mary's Press
| year = 2006
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=8iC6UpAwH58C
| isbn = 978-0884899037
}}
* {{Cite book
| last1 = Goldingay
| first1 = John
| title = Genesis
| publisher = Baker Academic
| year = 2020
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CdbIDwAAQBAJ&dq=Torah+%22warning+of+an+ongoing+conflict%22&pg=PP89
| isbn = 978-1493423972
}}
* {{Cite book
| last = Jenkins
| first = Philip
| title = The Many Faces of Christ
| publisher = Hachette
| year = 2015
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Np9VDgAAQBAJ&q=%22John+of+Damascus+reported+what+was+by+then+the+standard+Eastern+tradition%22&pg=PT66
| isbn = 978-0465061617
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Kerr
| first1 = W.N.
| chapter = Mary, Assumption of
| editor1-last = Elwell
| editor1-first = Walter A.
| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology
| publisher = Baker Academic
| year = 2001
| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yu846j61u0wC&pg=PA746
| isbn = 978-0801020759
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Miravalle
| first1 = Mark I.
| title = Introduction to Mary: The Heart of Marian Doctrine and Devotion
| publisher = Queenship Publishing
| year = 2006
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=8RBQWc9fWacC&pg=PA51
| isbn = 9781882972067
}}
* {{Cite book
| last = O'Carroll
| first = Michael
| title = Theotokos: A Theological Encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary
| publisher = Wipf and Stock
| year = 2000
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=xYlKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56
| isbn = 978-1579104542
}}
* {{cite book
|last1 = Shoemaker
|first1 = Stephen J.
|title = Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion
|publisher = Yale University Press
|year = 2016
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Fa8ODAAAQBAJ
|isbn = 978-0300217216
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Shoemaker
| first1 = Stephen J.
| title = Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2002
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=YuQTDAAAQBAJ&q=Decretum+Gelasianum+assumption+mary&pg=PA11
| isbn = 978-0199250752
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Wagner
| first1 = David M.
| title = The Church and the Modern Era (1846–2005)
| publisher = Ave Maria Press
| year = 2020
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=zXrtDwAAQBAJ
| isbn = 978-1594717888
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Warner
| first1 = Marina
| title = Alone of All Her Sex
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2016
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=4DATDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91
| isbn = 978-0198718789
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Williams
| first1 = Paul
| chapter = The English Reformers and the Blessed Virgin Mary
| editor1-last = Maunder
| editor1-first = Chris
| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2019
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ
| isbn = 978-0198792550
}}
* {{Cite book
| last = Zirpolo
| first = Lilian H.
| title = Historical Dictionary of Baroque Art and Architecture
| publisher = Rowman & Littlefield
| year = 2018
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=C51ODwAAQBAJ
| isbn = 978-1538111291
}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
* Duggan, Paul E. (1989). ''The Assumption Dogma: Some Reactions and Ecumenical Implications in the Thought of English-speaking Theologians''. Emerson Press, Cleveland, Ohio. * Duggan, Paul E. (1989). ''The Assumption Dogma: Some Reactions and Ecumenical Implications in the Thought of English-speaking Theologians''. Emerson Press, Cleveland, Ohio.{{ISBN?}}
*{{cite book|chapter=]|title=Mary, help of Christians|year=1909|publisher=Benziger Brothers|first=Bonaventure|last=Hammer}}
* Mimouni, Simon Claude (1995). ''Dormition et assomption de Marie: Histoire des traditions anciennes''. Beauchesne, Paris.
* Mimouni, Simon Claude (1995). ''Dormition et assomption de Marie: Histoire des traditions anciennes''. Beauchesne, Paris. {{ISBN?}}
* {{cite journal |last=Salvador-Gonzalez |first=José-María |title=Musical Resonanes in the Assumption of Mary and Their Reflection in the Italian Trecento and Quattrocento Painting |journal=Music in Art: International Journal for Music Iconography |volume=44 |issue=1–2 |date=2019 |pages=79–96 |issn=1522-7464 }}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Commons category|Assumption of Mary}} {{Commons category|Assumption of Mary}}
* Vatican, 1 November 1950 * Vatican, 1 November 1950
* (]) * (])
* {{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionG2/dormitionG2.htm |title=The Book of John Concerning the Falling Asleep of Mary, attributed to John the Theologian.|publisher=Uoregon.edu |access-date=3 November 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831092509/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionG2/dormitionG2.htm |archive-date=31 August 2009 |df=dmy-all }}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL1.htm |title=De Transitus Beatae Mariae Virginis (the Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary), attributed to Melito of Sardis. |publisher=Uoregon.edu |access-date=3 November 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090413212601/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL1.htm |archive-date=13 April 2009 |df=dmy-all }}


{{Virgin Mary}} {{Virgin Mary}}
{{Liturgical year of the Catholic Church}} {{Liturgical year of the Catholic Church}}
{{History of the Catholic Church}}
{{Catholicism}} {{Catholicism}}
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Assumption Of Mary}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Assumption Of Mary}}
]
] ]
] ]
Line 168: Line 394:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:40, 2 January 2025

Bodily taking up of the Virgin Mary into Heaven "Santa Maria Assunta" redirects here. For churches with this dedication, see Santa Maria Assunta (churches). "Saint Mary of the Assumption" redirects here. For cathedrals with this dedication, see Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption. This article is about the theological concept. For works of art with this title, see Assumption of the Virgin Mary in art.

Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary
A famous treatment in Western art, Titian's Assumption, 1516–1518
Also called
  • The Assumption
  • Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Observed by
TypeChristian
SignificanceThe bodily taking up of Mary, the mother of Jesus into Heaven
ObservancesAttending Mass or service
Date
FrequencyAnnual
Memorial in Youghal, Ireland, to the promulgation of the dogma of the Assumption

The Assumption of Mary is one of the four Marian dogmas of the Catholic Church. Pope Pius XII defined it on 1 November 1950 in his apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus as follows:

We pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever-Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.

— Pope Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus, 1950

It leaves open the question of whether Mary died or whether she was raised to eternal life without bodily death.

The equivalent belief in the Eastern Christianity is the Dormition of the Mother of God or the "Falling Asleep of the Mother of God".

The word 'assumption' derives from the Latin word assūmptiō, meaning 'taking up'.

Pope Pius XII expressed in his encyclical Munificentissimus Deus the hope that the belief in the bodily assumption of the virgin Mary into heaven "will make our belief in our own resurrection stronger and render it more effective", while the Catechism of the Catholic Church adds: "The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a singular participation in her Son's Resurrection and an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians."

Traditions relating to the Assumption

In some versions of the assumption narrative, the assumption is said to have taken place in Ephesus, in the House of the Virgin Mary. This is a much more recent and localised tradition. The earliest traditions say that Mary's life ended in Jerusalem (see Tomb of the Virgin Mary).

According to the Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary, attributed to Joseph of Arimathea, which is a later version of the Virgin Mary's Dormition, probably from sometime after the early seventh century, one of the apostles, often identified as Thomas the Apostle, was not present at the death of Mary but his late arrival precipitates a reopening of Mary's tomb, which is found to be empty except for her grave clothes. Finally, Mary drops her girdle down to the apostle from heaven as testament to the event. This incident is depicted in many later paintings of the Assumption.

Teaching of the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world, having been celebrated as early as the 5th century and having been established in the East by Emperor Maurice around AD 600. In a homily, John Damascene (675–749 AD), citing the third book of the Euthymiac History, records the following:

St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), made known to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened upon the request of St. Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that the body was taken up to heaven.

History

Parma Cathedral, Illusionistic dome, Correggio, 1526–1530

Some scholars argue that the Dormition and Assumption traditions can be traced early in church history in the apocryphal books, with Stephen J. Shoemaker stating:

For instance, Baldi, Masconi, and Cothenet analyzed the corpus of Dormition narratives using a rather different approach, governed primarily by language tradition rather than literary relations, and yet all agree that the Obsequies (i.e., the Liber Requiei Mariae) and the Six Books Dormition Apocryphon reflect the earliest traditions, locating their origins in the second or third century.

According to Shoemaker, the first known narrative to address the end of Mary's life and her assumption is the apocryphal third- and possibly second-century Liber Requiei Mariae ("The Book of Mary's Repose"). Yet numerous features indicate that the Liber Requiei Mariae, or the Obsequies of the Virgin, as the text is called in Syriac, is even older than this ancient manuscript alone would suggest.

Another early source that speaks of the Assumption is the "Six Books Dormition Apocryphon", so- called on account of its division into six separate books. It dates almost certainly to the middle of the fourth century, if not perhaps even earlier. Most significantly, the Six Books Dormition Apocryphon provides compelling evidence for an early cult of the Virgin nearly a century before the events of the Council of Ephesus.

The Greek Discourse on the Dormition or The Book of John Concerning the Falling Asleep of Mary (attributed to John the Theologian), is another anonymous narrative, and may even precede the Book of Mary's Repose. This Greek document, is dated by Tischendorf as no later than the 4th century. but is dated by Shoemaker as later.

The New Testament is silent regarding the end of her life. In the late 4th century Epiphanius of Salamis wrote he could find no authorized tradition about how her life ended. Nevertheless, although Epiphanius could not decide on the basis of biblical or church tradition whether Mary had died or remained immortal, his indecisive reflections suggest that some difference of opinion on the matter had already arisen in his time, and he identified three beliefs concerning her end: that she had a normal and peaceful death; that she died as a martyr; or that she did not die. Even more, in another text Epiphanius stated that Mary was like Elijah because she never died but was assumed, like him.

Other works that mention the assumption of Mary are the apocryphal treatise De Obitu S. Dominae, bearing the name of St. John, which belongs however to the fourth or fifth century. It is also found in the apocryphal book De Transitus Beatae Mariae Virginis, falsely ascribed to Melito of Sardis, and in a spurious letter attributed to Denis the Areopagite.

The Euthymiac History, from the sixth century, is cited by John of Damascus, which narrates how Mary was assumed into heaven.

John of Damascus set out what had become the standard Eastern tradition, that "Mary died in the presence of the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened, upon the request of St Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that her body was taken up to heaven."

The feast of the Dormition, arrived in the West in the early 7th century, its name changing to Assumption in some 9th century liturgical calendars. The feast was decreed for Constantinople on 15 August by the emperor Maurice in 600; about fifty years later it was introduced in Rome and is mentioned in a papal decree of Sergius (687-701), who fixed a procession for the feast. Pope Leo IV (reigned 847–855) gave the feast a vigil and an octave to solemnise it above all others, Pope Nicholas I (858–867) placed it on a par with Christmas and Easter, and Pope Benedict XIV (1740–1758) declared it "a probable opinion, which to deny were impious and blasphemous".

Scholars of the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum "argued that during or shortly after the apostolic age a group of Jewish Christians in Jerusalem preserved an oral tradition about the end of the Virgin's life". Thus, by pointing to oral tradition, they argued for the historicity of the assumption and Dormition narratives. According to Antoine Wenger "the strikingly diverse traditions of Mary's Dormition and Assumption arise from ‘a great variety of original types’, rather than being the result of a progressive modification of a single, original tradition". Simon Claude Mimouni and his predecessors have argued that belief in the Virgin's Assumption is the final dogmatic development, rather than the point of origin, of these traditions.

There is a large number of accounts of assumption of the Virgin Mary, published in various languages (including Greek, Latin, Coptic, Syriac, Ethiopic, Arabic). The standard Greek text is the one attributed to St John the Theologian (Evangelist). The standard Latin is that attributed to Melito of Sardis. Shoemaker mentions that "the ancient narratives are neither clear nor unanimous in either supporting or contradicting the dogma" of the assumption.

Scriptural basis

See also: Mary, mother of Jesus § After the Ascension of Jesus
The Basilica of the Assumption of Our Lady, also known as Mosta Dome or as Mosta Rotunda, in Mosta, Malta. The façade is decorated for the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August.

The apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus mentions several Holy Fathers, theologians and Doctors of the Church who held the Assumption of Mary, among them are Adrian I, Sergius I, Leo IV, John of Damascus, Amadeus of Lausanne, Modestus of Jerusalem, Anthony of Padua, Albertus Magnus, Thomas of Aquinas (Angelic Doctor), Bonaventure (Seraphic Doctor), Bernardino of Siena, Robert Bellarmine, Francis de Sales, Peter Canisius, Francisco Suárez, among others. The apostolic constitution adds: "All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation."

Father Jugie, expressed the view that Revelation 12:1–2 was the chief scriptural witness to the assumption:

And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; and she was with child ...

— Revelation 12:1–2

This passage, Epiphanius proposes, may indicate that Mary did not die as other human beings, but somehow remained immortal, although he makes clear his own uncertainty and refrains from advocating this view. Ultimately Epiphanius concludes: " am not saying that she remained immortal. But neither am I affirming that she died."

Since the time of the early Church Fathers, this image of "the woman clothed with the sun" has had a threefold symbolism: the ancient people of Israel, the Church and Mary.

Many of the bishops cited Genesis 3:15, in which God is addressing the serpent in the Garden of Eden, as the primary confirmation of Mary's assumption:

I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.

— Genesis 3:15

Many scholars connect Jesus' usage of the word "woman" to call Mary instead of calling her "mother" as a confirmation of Mary being the "woman" described in Genesis 3:15. Mary was often seen as the "New Eve", who crushed the serpent's head at the Annunciation by obeying the angel Gabriel when he said she would bear the Messiah (Luke 1:38).

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms that the account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, and that the fall of mankind, by the seductive voice of the snake in the Bible, represents the fallen angel, Satan or "the devil". Similarly, the great dragon in Revelation 12 is a representation of Satan, identified with the serpent from the garden who has enmity with the woman. Therefore, in Catholic thought, there is an association between this woman and Mary's Assumption.

Among the many other passages noted by Pope Pius XII were the following:

  • Psalm 132 (Psalm 132:8), greeting the return of the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem ("Arise, O Lord, into your resting place, you and the ark which you have sanctified!"), where the ark is taken as the prophetic "type" of Mary;
  • Revelation 11:19, in which John sees the Ark of the Covenant in heaven (this verse immediately precedes the vision of the woman clothed with the sun);
  • Luke 1:28, in which the Archangel Gabriel greets Mary with the words, "Hail Mary, full of grace", since Mary's bodily assumption is a natural consequence of being full of grace;
  • 1 Corinthians 15 (1 Corinthians 15:23) and Matthew 27 (Matthew 27:52–53), concerning the certainty of bodily resurrection for all who have faith in Jesus.

The Bible mentions two prominent figures, Enoch and Elijah, who were taken up to heaven, serving as important precedents for the assumption of Mary. Enoch, referenced in the Book of Genesis, is noted for his intimate walk with God and is described as having been "taken" by God (Genesis 5:24), an event that is also reported in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Hebrews 11:5). Similarly, Elijah, the great prophet, was taken up to heaven in a whirlwind, accompanied by a chariot of fire, as recorded in 2 Kings (2 Kings 2:11).

Catholic marian visionaries and the Assumption

In the 12th century, the German nun Elisabeth of Schönau was reportedly granted visions of Mary and her son which had a profound influence on the Western Church's tradition. In her work Visio de resurrectione beate virginis Mariae relates how Mary was assumed in body and soul into Heaven.

On 1 May 1950 Gilles Bouhours (a marian seer) reported to Pius XII a presumed message that the Virgin Mary would have ordered him to communicate to the pope on the dogma of the Assumption of the Holy Virgin Mary. It is said that Pius XII asked God, during the Holy Year of 1950, for a sign that could reassure him that the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary was actually wanted by God and when Gilles communicated the message to Pius XII, the pope considered this message the hoped-for sign. Six months after the private audience granted to Gilles by the pope, Pius XII himself proclaimed the dogma of the Assumption of body and soul of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven.

Assumption versus Dormition

See also: Dormition of the Mother of God
The Dormition: ivory plaque, late 10th-early 11th century (Musée de Cluny)

Some Catholics believe that Mary died before being assumed, but they believe that she was miraculously resurrected before being assumed (mortalistic interpretation). Others believe she was assumed bodily into Heaven without first dying (immortalistic interpretation). Either understanding may be legitimately held by Catholics, with Eastern Catholics observing the Feast as the Dormition. It seems, however, that there is much more evidence for the mortalistic position in the Catholic traditions (liturgy, apocrypha, material culture). Pope John Paul II expressed the mortalistic position in his public speech.

Many theologians note by way of comparison that in the Catholic Church the Assumption is dogmatically defined, whilst in the Eastern Orthodox tradition the Dormition is less dogmatically than liturgically and mystically defined. Such differences spring from a larger pattern in the two traditions, wherein Catholic teachings are often dogmatically and authoritatively defined – in part because of the more centralized structure of the Catholic Church – whilst in Eastern Orthodoxy many doctrines are less authoritative.

The Latin Catholic Feast of the Assumption is celebrated on 15 August and the Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholics celebrate the Dormition of the Mother of God (or Dormition of the Theotokos, the falling asleep of the Mother of God) on the same date, preceded by a 14-day fasting period. Eastern Christians believe that Mary died a natural death, that her soul was received by Christ upon death, that her body was resurrected after her death and that she was taken up into heaven bodily in anticipation of the general resurrection.

Orthodox tradition is clear and unwavering in regard to the central point : the Holy Virgin underwent, as did her Son, a physical death, but her body – like His – was afterwards raised from the dead and she was taken up into heaven, in her body as well as in her soul. She has passed beyond death and judgement and lives wholly in the Age to Come. The Resurrection of the Body ... has in her case been anticipated and is already an accomplished fact. That does not mean, however, that she is dissociated from the rest of humanity and placed in a wholly different category: for we all hope to share one day in that same glory of the Resurrection of the Body that she enjoys even now.

Protestant views

The Assumption of Mary, Rubens, 1626

Views differ within Protestantism, with those with a theology closer to Catholicism sometimes believing in a bodily assumption whilst most Protestants do not.

Lutheran views

The Feast of the Assumption of Mary was retained by the Lutheran Church after the Reformation. Evangelical Lutheran Worship designates August 15 as a lesser festival named "Mary, Mother of Our Lord" while the current Lutheran Service Book formally calls it "St. Mary, Mother of our Lord".

Anglican views

Within Anglicanism the Assumption of Mary is accepted by some, rejected by others, or regarded as adiaphora ("a thing indifferent"). The doctrine effectively disappeared from Anglican worship in 1549, partially returning in Anglo-Catholic tradition during the 20th century under different names. A Marian feast on 15 August is celebrated by the Church of England as a non-specific feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a feast called by the Scottish Episcopal Church simply "Mary the Virgin", and in the US-based Episcopal Church it is observed as the feast of "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ", while other Anglican provinces have a feast of the Dormition – the Anglican Church of Canada's Book of Common Prayer (1962), for instance, marks the day as the "Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary".

The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission, which seeks to identify common ground between the two communions, released in 2004 a non-authoritative declaration meant for study and evaluation, the "Seattle Statement"; this "agreed statement" concludes that "the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception, understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions".

Other Protestant views

The Protestant reformer Heinrich Bullinger believed in the assumption of Mary. His 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry expressed his belief that Mary's sacrosanctum corpus ("sacrosanct body") had been assumed into heaven by angels:

Hac causa credimus ut Deiparae virginis Mariae purissimum thalamum et spiritus sancti templum, hoc est, sacrosanctum corpus ejus deportatum esse ab angelis in coelum.

For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.

Feasts and related fasting period

The feast of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary at Novara di Sicilia in August

Orthodox Christians fast for fourteen days before the Feast of the Assumption of Mary, including abstinence from sexual relations. Fasting in the Orthodox Churches generally consists of abstinence from certain food groups; during the Dormition fast, one observes a strict fast on weekdays, with wine and oil allowed on weekends and, additionally, fish on the Transfiguration (August 6).

The Assumption is important to many Christians, especially Catholics and Orthodox, as well as many Lutherans and Anglicans, as the Virgin Mary's heavenly birthday (the day that Mary was received into Heaven). Belief about her acceptance into the glory of Heaven is seen by some Christians as the symbol of the promise made by Jesus to all enduring Christians that they too will be received into paradise. The Assumption of Mary is symbolised in the Fleur-de-lys Madonna.

The present Italian name of the holiday, Ferragosto, may derive from the Latin name, Feriae Augusti ("Holidays of the Emperor Augustus"), since the month of August took its name from the emperor. The feast was introduced by Bishop Cyril of Alexandria in the 5th century. In the course of Christianization, he put it on 15 August. In the middle of August, Augustus celebrated his victories over Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra at Actium and Alexandria with a three-day triumph. The anniversaries (and later only 15 August) were public holidays from then on throughout the Roman Empire.

The Solemnity of the Assumption on 15 August was celebrated in the Eastern Church from the 6th century. The Western Church adopted this date as a Holy Day of Obligation to commemorate the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a reference to the belief in a real, physical elevation of her sinless soul and incorrupt body into Heaven.

Public holidays

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Assumption of Mary" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Patoleo (sweet rice cakes) are the pièce de résistance of the Assumption feast celebration among Goan Catholics.

Assumption Day on 15 August is a nationwide public holiday in Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chile, Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, East Timor, France, Gabon, Greece, Georgia, Republic of Guinea, Haiti, Italy, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of North Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Mauritius, Monaco, Montenegro (Albanian Catholics), Paraguay, Philippines (Maragondon, Cavite),Poland (coinciding with Polish Army Day), Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tahiti, Togo, and Vanuatu; and was also in Hungary until 1948.

It is also a public holiday in parts of Germany (parts of Bavaria and Saarland) and Switzerland (in 14 of the 26 cantons) and Bosnia (the Croatian zone). In Guatemala, it is observed in Guatemala City and in the town of Santa Maria Nebaj, both of which claim her as their patron saint. Also, this day is combined with Mother's Day in Costa Rica and parts of Belgium.

Prominent Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox countries in which Assumption Day is an important festival but is not recognised by the state as a public holiday include the Czech Republic, Ireland, Mexico, the Philippines and Russia. In Bulgaria, the Feast of the Assumption is the biggest Eastern Orthodox Christian celebration of the Holy Virgin. Celebrations include liturgies and votive offerings. In Varna, the day is celebrated with a procession of a holy icon, and with concerts and regattas.

In many places, religious parades and popular festivals are held to celebrate this day. In Canada, Assumption Day is the Fête Nationale of the Acadians, of whom she is the patroness saint. Some businesses close on that day in heavily francophone parts of New Brunswick, Canada. The Virgin Assumed in Heaven is also patroness of the Maltese Islands and her feast, celebrated on 15 August, apart from being a public holiday in Malta it is also celebrated with great solemnity in the local churches especially in the seven localities known as the Seba' Santa Marijiet. The Maltese localities which celebrate the Assumption of Our Lady are: Il-Mosta, Il-Qrendi, Ħal Kirkop, Ħal Għaxaq, Il-Gudja, Ħ'Attard, L-Imqabba and Victoria. The hamlet of Praha, Texas, holds a festival during which its population swells from approximately 25 to 5,000 people.

In Anglicanism and Lutheranism, the feast is now often kept, but without official use of the word "Assumption". In Eastern Orthodox churches following the Julian Calendar, the feast day of Assumption of Mary falls on 28 August.

Art

Main article: Assumption of the Virgin Mary in art

The earliest known use of the Dormition is found on a sarcophagus in the crypt of a church in Zaragoza in Spain dated c. 330. The Assumption became a popular subject in Western Christian art, especially from the 12th century, and especially after the Reformation, when it was used to refute the Protestants and their downplaying of Mary's role in salvation. Angels commonly carry her heavenward where she is to be crowned by Christ, while the Apostles below surround her empty tomb as they stare up in awe. Caravaggio, the "father" of the Baroque movement, caused a stir by depicting her as a decaying corpse, quite contrary to the doctrine promoted by the church; more orthodox examples include works by El Greco, Rubens, Annibale Carracci, and Nicolas Poussin, the last replacing the Apostles with putti throwing flowers into the tomb.

See also

References

Citations

  1. "Feast of the Assumption of the Holy Mother-of-God". The Armenian Church. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 23 August 2021.
  2. ^ Pius XII (1 November 1950). "Munificentissimus Deus". Holy See.
  3. Collinge 2012, p. 53.
  4. Munificentissimus Deus, No. 42
  5. Catechism of the Catholic Church #966. Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  6. Meistermann, B. "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary". www.newadvent.org. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  7. Shoemaker, Stephen J. "(Ps.-)Joseph of Arimathea, The Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary". Archived from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  8. Ante-Nicene Fathers. The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325, vol. 8 p. 594
  9. Alban Butler, Paul Burns (1998). Butler's Lives of the Saints. ISBN 0860122573. pp. 140–141
  10. William Saunders (1996). "The Assumption of Mary". EWTN. Archived 16 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  11. "The Dormition of the Mother of God – Saint Joseph Orthodox Church". Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  12. ^ Shoemaker, Stephen. "The Ancient Dormition Apocrypha and the Origins of Marian Piety: Early Evidence of Marian Intercession from Late Ancient Palestine (uncorrected page proofs)".
  13. Shoemaker 2016, p. 24.
  14. ^ Shoemaker 2016, p. 25.
  15. "Patrick Truglia, "Original Sin in The Byzantine Dormition Narratives" Revista Teologica, Issue 4 (2021): 9 (Footnote 30)" (PDF).
  16. "Apocrypha of the New Testament", 'Introductory Notice to the Apocrypha of the New Testament, Vol 8, The Ante-Nicene Fathers.
  17. "Philip Schaff: ANF08. The Twelve Patriarchs, Excerpts and Epistles, The Clementia, Apocrypha, Decretals, Memoirs of Edessa and Syriac Documents, Remains of the First Age - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". ccel.org. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
  18. Patrick Truglia, "Original Sin in The Byzantine Dormition Narratives", Revista Teologica, Issue 4 (2021): 9 (Footnote 30).
  19. Shoemaker 2002, pp. 11–12, 26.
  20. ^ Shoemaker 2002, p. 14.
  21. Shoemaker, Stephen J. (2008). "Epiphanius of Salamis, the Kollyridians, and the Early Dormition Narratives: The Cult of the Virgin in the Fourth Century". Journal of Early Christian Studies 16 (3): 371–401. ISSN 1086-3184.
  22. Holweck, Frederick (1907). CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Assumption of Mary. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907. Retrieved 30 July 2024.
  23. ^ Zirpolo 2018, p. 213.
  24. John Wortley, "The Marian Relics at Constantinople", Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 45 (2005), pp. 171–187, esp. 181–182.
  25. Jenkins 2015, p. unpaginated.
  26. ^ Warner 2016, p. 91.
  27. O'Carroll, Michael (1983). Theotokos: A Theological Encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Glazier. p. 55-57. ISBN 978-0-907271-11-6. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  28. Wagner 2020, p. 95.
  29. Shoemaker 2002, pp. 18–20.
  30. Elliott, J. K. (27 October 2005). The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: OUP Oxford. p. 691. ISBN 978-0-19-826181-0. Retrieved 15 August 2024.
  31. Shoemaker 2002, p. 3.
  32. O'Carroll 2000, p. 56.
  33. Shoemaker 2002, p. 12.
  34. Saunder, William (2004). "Woman Clothed with the Sun". Arlington Catholic Herald. Catholic Education Resource Center. Archived from the original on 13 July 2013. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
  35. ^ Miravalle 2006, p. 73.
  36. Taylor, Edward K. (1961). "The Woman of Cana". The Furrow. 12 (5): 304–310. ISSN 0016-3120. JSTOR 27658099.
  37. "Catechism of the Catholic Church – IntraText". Holy See. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  38. Williamson, Peter (2015). Catholic Christian Commentary on Sacred Scripture: Revelation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. pp. 205–220. ISBN 978-0801036507.
  39. "Assumption of Mary: Scriptural Support". University of Dayton, Ohio.
  40. Clark, Anne L. (1992). Elisabeth of Schönau: a twelfth-century visionary. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 382. ISBN 9780812231236.
  41. "Gilles Bouhours". Santiebeati.it. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
  42. The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 ISBN 1402208065 p. 64
  43. Shoemaker 2016, p. 201
  44. Witała, Maciej (16 December 2021). "Proposition of a Modern Theological Interpretation of Death as a Consequence of Sin". Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne. 39 (39): 40–41. doi:10.14746/pst.2021.39.02. ISSN 2451-2273.
  45. John Paul II. "General Audience 25 June 1997". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  46. See "Three Sermons on the Dormition of the Virgin" by John of Damascus, from the Medieval Sourcebook
  47. Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, in: Festal Menaion , p. 64.
  48. ^ Beane, Larry (15 August 2019). "The Feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary". Gottesdienst.org. Retrieved 27 May 2021. Many early Lutherans retained the Feast of the Assumption in the liturgical calendar, while recognizing it as a speculation rather than a dogma. However, Pope Pius XII dogmatized this belief in 1950 in his decree Munificentissimus Dei (sic), thus imposing it as doctrine upon Roman Catholics. ... Today's feast is described in Lutheran Service Book as 'St. Mary, Mother of our Lord'.
  49. Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the adiaphora."
  50. ^ Williams, Paul (2007). p. 253, incl. note 54.
  51. The Church of England, official website: The Calendar. Accessed 17 July 2018
  52. The Scottish Episcopal Church, official website: Calendar and Lectionary. Accessed 17 July 2018
  53. The Episcopal Church. "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ". Liturgical Calendar. New York: The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, The Episcopal Church. Archived from the original on 17 July 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
  54. "The Calendar". Prayerbook.ca. p. ix. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  55. "Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ". Vatican.va. 26 June 2000. Retrieved 3 November 2013. There is no direct testimony in Scripture concerning the end of Mary's life. However, certain passages give instances of those who follow God's purposes faithfully being drawn into God's presence. Moreover, these passages offer hints or partial analogies that may throw light on the mystery of Mary's entry into glory.
  56. De origine erroris libri duo . "In the De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in 4 ° (Zurich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work." The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (c. 1540–1617), Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, ISBN 978-9514109447, p. 175
  57. Froschauer. De origine erroris, Caput XVI (Chapter 16), p. 70
  58. The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary (1996), George H. Tavard, Liturgical Press ISBN 978-0814659144, p. 109.
  59. Menzel, Konstantinos (14 April 2014). "Abstaining From Sex Is Part of Fasting". Greekreporter.com. Greek Reporter. Retrieved 27 May 2021.
  60. "The Fasting Seasons | Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese".
  61. Pianigiani, Ottorino (1907). "Vocabolario etimologico della lingua italiana".
  62. Giebel, Marion (1984). Augustus. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. p. 6. ISBN 3499503271.
  63. "Zakon o blagdanima, spomendanima i neradnim danima u Republici Hrvatskoj". Narodne novine (in Croatian). 14 November 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2024.
  64. Columbus World Travel Guide, 25th ed.
  65. Reiland, Catherine. "To Heaven Through the Streets of Guatemala City: the Processions of the Virgin of the Assumption". Emisferica. Archived from the original on 22 December 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  66. "The Assumption of Mary into Heaven, the most revered summer Orthodox Christian feast in Bulgaria". bnr.bg.
  67. ^ Zirpolo 2018, p. 83.
  68. Zirpolo 2018, pp. 213–214.

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Duggan, Paul E. (1989). The Assumption Dogma: Some Reactions and Ecumenical Implications in the Thought of English-speaking Theologians. Emerson Press, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hammer, Bonaventure (1909). "Novena 5: for the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary" . Mary, help of Christians. Benziger Brothers.
  • Mimouni, Simon Claude (1995). Dormition et assomption de Marie: Histoire des traditions anciennes. Beauchesne, Paris.
  • Salvador-Gonzalez, José-María (2019). "Musical Resonanes in the Assumption of Mary and Their Reflection in the Italian Trecento and Quattrocento Painting". Music in Art: International Journal for Music Iconography. 44 (1–2): 79–96. ISSN 1522-7464.

External links

Mary, mother of Jesus
Family
Life
Tradition: early life
In the Bible
Tradition: later life
Apocryphal
Mariology
Christian
Other
Veneration
Titles
Prayers
Art
West
East
Related
Liturgical year of the Catholic Church
Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite of the Latin Church (1969 Calendar)
Advent
Christmas Season
Ordinary Time
Lent
Paschal Triduum
Easter Season
Ordinary Time
Tridentine Mass of the Roman Rite of the Latin Church (1960 Calendar)
Advent
Christmas Season
Epiphany Season
Lent
Pre-Lent
Lent
Passiontide
Paschal Triduum
Easter Season
Pentecost Season
Legend
P = Ordinary Procession according to the Roman Ritual
Legend
Italic font marks the 10 holy days of obligation in the universal calendar which do not normally fall on a Sunday.
Older calendars
1955
pre-1955
Tridentine
Liturgical colours
Ranking
Computus
Easter cycle
icon Catholic Church portal
History of the Catholic Church
General
Early Church
(30–325/476)
Origins and
Apostolic Age (30–100)
Ante-Nicene period (100–325)
Late antiquity
(313–476)
Great Church
(180–451)
Roman
state church

(380–451)
Early Middle Ages
High Middle Ages
Late Middle Ages
Protestant Reformation
Counter-Reformation
Baroque period to the
French Revolution
19th century
20th century
21st century
Catholic Church
History
Timeline
Ecclesiastical
Legal
Early Church
Great Church
Middle Ages
Modern era
Theology
Bible
Tradition
Catechism
General
Ecclesiology
Sacraments
Mariology
Philosophy
Saints
Organisation
Hierarchy
Canon law
Laity
Precedence
By country
Holy See
(List of popes)
Vatican City
Polity (Holy orders)
Consecrated life
Particular churches
sui iuris
Catholic liturgy
Culture
Media
Religious orders,
institutes, societies
Associations
of the faithful
Charities
Categories: