Misplaced Pages

Chaldia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:47, 31 May 2019 editPreservedmoose (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,062 edits Copied from Chalybes page excerpt originally written by TheMistAnchorite1← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:59, 22 October 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB 
(26 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Historical region of Anatolia}}
{{Distinguish|Chaldea}} {{Distinguish|Chaldea}}
{{Infobox Former Subdivision {{Infobox Former Subdivision
|native_name = {{lang|grc|Χαλδία, θέμα Χαλδίας}} |native_name = {{lang|grc|Χαλδία, θέμα Χαλδίας}}
|conventional_long_name = Theme of Chaldia |conventional_long_name = Theme of Chaldia
|common_name = Chaldia |common_name = Chaldia
|subdivision = ] |subdivision = ]
|nation = the ] |nation = the ]
|era = Middle Ages |era = Middle Ages
|capital = ] |capital = ]
|image_map =Asia Minor ca 842 AD.svg |image_map = Asia Minor ca 842 AD.svg
|image_map_caption = Map of the administrative structure of the Byzantine Empire in 842. Chaldia's strategic location in the north-easternmost corner of the Empire is evident. |image_map_caption = Map of the administrative structure of the Byzantine Empire in 842. Chaldia's strategic location in the north-easternmost corner of the Empire is evident.
|life_span = ca. 820/840–1091/1095<br>1098–1126<br>1140–1204 |life_span = {{circa}} 820/840–1091/1095<br>1098–1126<br>1140–1204
|year_start = ca. 820/840 |year_start = {{circa}} 820/840
|event_start = Establishment as a theme |event_start = Establishment as a theme
|year_event1 = 1091/1095–1098 |date_event1 = 1091/1095–1098
|event1 = Autonomy from Byzantine rule after ] incursions |event1 = Autonomy from Byzantine rule after ] incursions
|year_event2 = 1126–1140 |date_event2 = 1126–1140
|event2 = Rebellion of ] |event2 = Rebellion of ]
|year_event3 = 1204 |date_event3 = 1204
|event3 = Autonomy from Byzantine rule after ] |event3 = Autonomy from Byzantine rule after ]
|year_end = 1461 |year_end = 1461
|event_end = Fall to the ] |event_end = Fall to the ]
}} }}


'''Chaldia''' ({{lang-el|Χαλδία}}, ''Khaldia'') was a historical region located in mountainous interior of the eastern ], northeast ] (modern ]). Its name was derived from a people called the ''Chaldoi'' (or '']'') that inhabited the region in antiquity. Chaldia was used throughout the ] period and was established as a formal ], known as the '''Theme of Chaldia''' (Greek: θέμα Χαλδίας), by 840. During the ], it formed the core of the ] until its fall to the ] in 1461. '''Chaldia''' ({{langx|el|Χαλδία}}, ''Khaldia'') was a historical region located in the mountainous interior of the eastern ], northeast ] (modern ]). Its name was derived from a people called the ''Chaldoi'' (or '']'') that inhabited the region in ]. Chaldia was used throughout the ] period and was established as a formal ], known as the '''Theme of Chaldia''' (Greek: θέμα Χαλδίας), by 840. During the ], it formed the core of the ] until its fall to the ] in 1461.


] traces the origin of its name not to ], as ] had done, but to the ], for whose speakers ] was the Sun God. Bryer notes at the time of his writing that a number of villages in the ] district were still known as "Halt".<ref>Anthony Bryer, , ''Dumbarton Oaks Papers'', '''29''' (1975), p. 116f</ref> Other scholars, however, reject the Urartian connection. Χάλυψ, the tribe's name in ], means "tempered iron, steel", a term that passed into ] as ''chalybs'', "steel". Sayce derived the Greek name ''Chalybe'' from Hittite ''Khaly-wa'', "land of Halys".<ref></ref> More than an identifiable people or tribe, "Chalybes" was a generic Greek term for "peoples of the Black Sea coast who trade in iron".<ref>I. M. Diakonoff The Pre-history of the Armenian People, Yerevan, 1968 (Delmar, New York, 1984) {{ISBN|9780882060392}}. ] traces the origin of its name not to ], as ] had done, but to the ], for whose speakers ] was the ]. Bryer notes at the time of his writing that a number of villages in the ] district were still known as "Halt".<ref>Anthony Bryer, , ''Dumbarton Oaks Papers'', '''29''' (1975), p. 116f</ref> Other scholars, however, reject the Urartian connection. Χάλυψ, the tribe's name in ], means "tempered iron, ]", a term that passed into ] as ''chalybs'', "steel". Sayce derived the Greek name ''Chalybe'' from Hittite ''Khaly-wa'', "land of Halys".<ref></ref> More than an identifiable people or tribe, "Chalybes" was a generic Greek term for "peoples of the Black Sea coast who trade in iron".<ref>I. M. Diakonoff The Pre-history of the Armenian People, Yerevan, 1968 (Delmar, New York, 1984) {{ISBN|9780882060392}}.
"The Greeks evidently used the name Chalybes for all of the inhabitants of the Pontus who traded in iron ore (see Pauly, s.v. Chalybes); in some cases we might suspect that the Moschi (in Pontus) and/or the Chalybes were foreign designations for the Chaldians (Halitu, Xaghtik') who actually did live between the Tibareni in the west, the Mosynoeci in the north, and the Matieni in the southeast."</ref> "The Greeks evidently used the name Chalybes for all of the inhabitants of the Pontus who traded in iron ore (see Pauly, s.v. Chalybes); in some cases we might suspect that the Moschi (in Pontus) and/or the Chalybes were foreign designations for the Chaldians (Halitu, Xaghtik') who actually did live between the Tibareni in the west, the Mosynoeci in the north, and the Matieni in the southeast."</ref>


==Geography== ==Geography==
Initially, the name Chaldia was consigned to the highland region around ],<ref name="Talbert1226"/> in northeast ], but in the middle Byzantine period, the name was extended to include the coastal areas, and thus the entire province around Trapezus (Trebizond, modern ]). Forming the easternmost area of the ], Chaldia was bounded to the north by the Black Sea, to the east by ], the westernmost part of ], to the south by ], ] and what the Romans and Byzantines called ], and to the west by the western half of Pontus. Its main cities were the two ancient ] colonies, Kerasus (modern ]) and Trapezus, situated in the coastal lowlands. The mountainous interior to the south, known as ''Mesochaldia'' ("Middle Chaldia"), was more sparsely inhabited and described by the 6th-century historian ] as "inaccessible", but rich in mineral deposits, especially lead, but also silver and gold. The mines of the region gave the name ''Argyropolis'' ("silver town", modern Gümüşhane) to the principal settlement {{Citation needed|date=November 2012}}. Initially, the name Chaldia was consigned to the highland region around ],<ref name="Talbert1226"/> in northeast ], but in the middle Byzantine period, the name was extended to include the coastal areas, and thus the entire province around Trapezus (Trebizond, modern ]). Forming the easternmost area of the ], Chaldia was bounded to the north by the Black Sea, to the east by ], the westernmost part of ], to the south by ], ] and what the Romans and Byzantines called ], and to the west by the western half of Pontus. Its main cities were the two ancient ] colonies, Kerasus (modern ]) and Trapezus, situated in the coastal lowlands. The mountainous interior to the south, known as ''Mesochaldia'' ("Middle Chaldia"), was more sparsely inhabited and described by the 6th-century historian ] as "inaccessible", but rich in mineral deposits, especially lead, but also silver and gold. The mines of the region gave the name ''Argyropolis'' ("silver town", modern Gümüşhane) to the principal settlement {{Citation needed|date=November 2012}}.


==History== ==History==
Byzantine sources provide evidence that the people of Chaldia and Tzanicha were descended from the indigenous inhabitants of the historical area of Chaldia. ] identifies them with the ancient people of Chalybia and describes them as rough and warlike.<ref>Jones, H.L. (ed.), Strabo, Geography (Loeb, New York 1917-1932), 548.18, 549.19.</ref> The first local inhabitants, the ''Chalybes'', were counted among the earliest ironsmith nations by Classical writers.<ref>http://mgu.bg/geoarchmin/naterials/49Kuparadze-et-al.pdf</ref> Indeed, the Greek name for steel is ''chalybas'' (Greek: χάλυβας), possibly deriving from them.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1854|p=602}}.</ref> The first Greek colony was that of Trapezus, founded by Greek traders from ], traditionally dated to 756 BC. Greek colonization was restricted to the coast, and in later ages ] remained likewise only nominal over the tribes of the interior.<ref name="Talbert1226">{{harvnb|Talbert|2000|p=1226}}.</ref> The one surviving word from the Chaldian language, ''Kakamar'' (the Chaldian name for the ]), points toward an ] connection.<ref>Robert H. Hewsen. ''Armenia: A Historical Atlas.'' University of Chicago Press. 2001.</ref> ] identifies the Chaldians with the ancient people of Chalybia and describes them as rough and warlike.<ref>Jones, H.L. (ed.), Strabo, Geography (Loeb, New York 1917-1932), 548.18, 549.19.</ref> The first local inhabitants, the ''Chalybes'', were counted among the earliest ironsmith nations by Classical writers.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://mgu.bg/geoarchmin/naterials/49Kuparadze-et-al.pdf |title=Ancient Georgian iron metallurgy and its ore base |access-date=2013-07-15 |archive-date=2016-08-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819033000/http://mgu.bg/geoarchmin/naterials/49Kuparadze-et-al.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> Indeed, the Greek name for steel is ''chalybas'' (Greek: χάλυβας), possibly deriving from them.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1854|p=602}}.</ref> According to ], the Chalybes were ].<ref>Apollonius Rhodius. Tr. by R. Merkel, by Edward P. Coleridge. ''The Argonautica''. pp. 49, 65. </ref> The first Greek colony was that of Trapezus, founded by Greek traders from ], traditionally dated to 756 BC. Greek colonization was restricted to the coast, and in later ages ] remained likewise only nominal over the tribes of the interior.<ref name="Talbert1226">{{harvnb|Talbert|2000|p=1226}}.</ref>


The coastal regions, however, belonged to the ] of '']''. Only during the reign of the ] ] (r. 527–565) were the warlike tribes, the ''Sannoi'' or '']'', subdued, Christianized, and brought under central rule.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2000|p=93}}.</ref> Justinian included the entire region in the newly constituted province of ''Armenia I Magna'' with Trapezus as its capital (under Emperor ], it was renamed ''Armenia III''). The coastal regions, however, belonged to the ] of '']''. Only during the reign of the ] ] (r. 527–565) were the warlike tribes, the ''Sannoi'' or '']'', subdued, Christianized, and brought under central rule.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2000|p=93}}.</ref> Justinian included the entire region in the newly constituted province of ''Armenia I Magna'' with Trapezus as its capital (under Emperor ], it was renamed ''Armenia III'').


In the second half of the 7th century, with the establishment of the ], the region (Pontus Polemoniacus with the portion of Armenia I known as ]) became part of the ], initially as the '']'' (division) of Chaldia, and later as a semi-distinct duchy (''doukaton'') or ]. By 840, and perhaps as early as 824, it was constituted as a theme in its own right.<ref name="Pertusi138">{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|p=138}}</ref><ref name="DOAKS">{{Harvnb|McGeer|Nesbitt|Oikonomides|2001|p=85}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1995|p=31}}.</ref> Arab geographers of the 9th and 10th centuries report differently on the theme: ] reports that it counted six fortified places, ] that its troops numbered 4,000, while ] writes that its governing '']'' commanded 10,000 men (certainly exaggerated) and had two subordinate '']''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|pp=138–139}}</ref> According to 10th-century documents, the ''strategos'' of Chaldia received twenty pounds of gold as an annual salary, of which half was paid by the state treasury and the rest came from the tax proceeds of his province, including the '']'' tax on the important trade routes from the East that converged on Trapezus.<ref name="Pertusi138"/><ref name="DOAKS"/> In the early 10th century, the theme's southern portion, the district of Keltzene, was detached and added to the newly established theme of ].<ref name="Pertusi139">{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|p=139}}</ref> In the second half of the 7th century, with the establishment of the ], the region (Pontus Polemoniacus with the portion of Armenia I known as ]) became part of the ], initially as the '']'' (division) of Chaldia, and later as a semi-distinct duchy (''doukaton'') or ]tate. By 840, and perhaps as early as 824, it was constituted as a theme in its own right.<ref name="Pertusi138">{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|p=138}}</ref><ref name="DOAKS">{{Harvnb|McGeer|Nesbitt|Oikonomides|2001|p=85}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1995|p=31}}.</ref> Arab geographers of the 9th and 10th centuries report differently on the theme: ] reports that it counted six fortified places, ] that its troops numbered 4,000, while ] writes that its governing '']'' commanded 10,000 men (certainly exaggerated) and had two subordinate '']''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|pp=138–139}}</ref> According to 10th-century documents, the ''strategos'' of Chaldia received twenty pounds of gold as an annual salary, of which half was paid by the state treasury and the rest came from the tax proceeds of his province, including the '']'' tax on the important trade routes from the East that converged on Trapezus.<ref name="Pertusi138"/><ref name="DOAKS"/> In the early 10th century, the theme's southern portion, the district of Keltzene, was detached and added to the newly established theme of ].<ref name="Pertusi139">{{Harvnb|Pertusi|1952|p=139}}</ref>


Until the eastern gains in the latter 10th century, Chaldia remained the northeastern frontier of the Byzantine Empire. During the periods 1091/1095–1098 and 1126–1140, the theme was practically autonomous from the Byzantine government. During the first period, under its ''doux'', ], the region had been cut off from the remaining Byzantine territories by the ], while during the second period, ''doux'' ] had rebelled against Emperor ]. After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the ], and the ]. A third, the ], was created after ] ], commanding the ] ] in Chaldia a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople, found himself ] emperor, and established himself in ].<ref>A. A. Vasiliev, , ''Speculum'', '''11''' (1936), pp. 18f</ref> Indeed, by the 14th century, the Empire was reduced practically to the territory of the old theme.<ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|p=817}}.</ref> The Empire of Trebizond managed to survive through successive upheavals by a combination of its inaccessible location, a small but capable army, and a sound diplomacy based on marriage alliances, before finally falling to the ] in 1461. Even thereafter, isolated fortresses in the interior continued to resist. Only in 1479 was the region subdued, when the castle of Golacha, the last remaining Christian stronghold in ], fell. Significant numbers of ] remained in the region throughout the Ottoman period, until the 1923 ]. Until the eastern gains in the latter 10th century, Chaldia remained the northeastern frontier of the Byzantine Empire. During the periods 1091/1095–1098 and 1126–1140, the theme was practically autonomous from the Byzantine government. During the first period, under its ''doux'', ], the region had been cut off from the remaining Byzantine territories by the ], while during the second period, ''doux'' ] had rebelled against Emperor ]. After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the ], and the ]. A third, the ], was created after ] ], commanding the ] ] in Chaldia a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople, found himself ] emperor, and established himself in ].<ref>A. A. Vasiliev, , ''Speculum'', '''11''' (1936), pp. 18f</ref> Indeed, by the 14th century, the Empire was reduced practically to the territory of the old theme.<ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|p=817}}.</ref> The Empire of Trebizond managed to survive through successive upheavals by a combination of its inaccessible location, a small but capable army, and a sound diplomacy based on marriage alliances, before finally falling to the ] in 1461. Even thereafter, isolated fortresses in the interior continued to resist. Only in 1479 was the region subdued, when the castle of Golacha, the last remaining Christian stronghold in ], fell. Significant numbers of ] remained in the region throughout the Ottoman period, until the 1923 ].


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist}}


==Sources== ==Sources==
{{refbegin|2}} {{refbegin|2}}
*{{cite book|last=Evans|first=James Allan Stewart|title=The Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power|location=London, United Kingdom and New York, New York|publisher=Routledge|year=2000|isbn=978-0-415-23726-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Oh2_SCMSDtAC|ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Evans|first=James Allan Stewart|title=The Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power|location=London and New York|publisher=Routledge|year=2000|isbn=978-0-415-23726-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Oh2_SCMSDtAC}}
*{{Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art|volume=4}}
*{{cite book|editor1-last=McGeer|editor1-first=Eric|editor2-last=Nesbitt|editor2-first=John W.|editor3-last=Oikonomides|editor3-first=Nicolas|editor3-link=Nicolas Oikonomides|title=Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art, Volume 4: The East|location=Washington, District of Columbia|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection|year=2001|isbn=0-88402-282-X|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=86Of2XxW2NMC|ref=harv}}
*{{cite book|last=Pertusi|first=A.|title=Constantino Porfirogenito: De Thematibus|location=Rome, Italy|publisher=Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana|year=1952|language=Italian|ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Pertusi|first=A.|title=Constantino Porfirogenito: De Thematibus|location=Rome|publisher=Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana|year=1952|language=it}}
*{{cite book|last=Smith|first=William|title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography |location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Little, Brown and Company|year=1854|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPBWAAAAMAAJ|ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Smith|first=William|title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography |location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Little, Brown and Company|year=1854|url=https://archive.org/details/dictionarygreek16smitgoog}}
*{{cite book|last=Talbert|first=Richard J. A.|title=Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World: Map-by-Map Directory|location=Princeton, New Jersey|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2000|isbn=978-0-691-04945-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x_FHmc_E2uQC|ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Talbert|first=Richard J. A.|title=Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World: Map-by-Map Directory|location=Princeton, New Jersey|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2000|isbn=978-0-691-04945-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x_FHmc_E2uQC}}
*{{cite book|last=Treadgold|first=Warren T.|title=Byzantium and Its Army, 284–1081|year=1995|location=Stanford, California|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=0-8047-3163-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xfV0LkMNaLUC|ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Treadgold|first=Warren T.|title=Byzantium and Its Army, 284–1081|year=1995|location=Stanford, California|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=0-8047-3163-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xfV0LkMNaLUC}}
*{{A History of the Byzantine State and Society}}
*{{cite book|last=Treadgold|first=Warren|title=A History of the Byzantine State and Society|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nYbnr5XVbzUC|location=Stanford, California|publisher=Stanford University Press|year=1997|isbn=0-8047-2630-2|ref=harv}}
{{refend|2}} {{refend|2}}


Line 57: Line 58:
{{refbegin}} {{refbegin}}
*{{cite book|last1=Bryer|first1=Anthony|last2=Winfield|first2=David|title=Byzantine Monuments and Topography of the Pontos, Volume 1|location=Washington, District of Columbia|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection|year=1985|isbn=0-88402-122-X|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=54kVAQAAMAAJ}} *{{cite book|last1=Bryer|first1=Anthony|last2=Winfield|first2=David|title=Byzantine Monuments and Topography of the Pontos, Volume 1|location=Washington, District of Columbia|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection|year=1985|isbn=0-88402-122-X|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=54kVAQAAMAAJ}}
*{{cite web|last1=Gyftopoulou|first1=Sofia|last2=Papadaki|first2=Irene|title=Chaldia (Byzantium)|work=Encyclopedia of the Hellenic World: Asia Minor|publisher=Foundation of the Hellenic World|date=March 10, 2005|url=http://asiaminor.ehw.gr/Forms/fLemma.aspx?lemmaid=6797&contlang=58|accessdate=16 June 2011|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811221041/http://asiaminor.ehw.gr/Forms/fLemma.aspx?lemmaid=6797&contlang=58|archivedate=11 August 2011|df=}} *{{cite encyclopedia|last1=Gyftopoulou|first1=Sofia|last2=Papadaki|first2=Irene|title=Chaldia (Byzantium)|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of the Hellenic World: Asia Minor|publisher=Foundation of the Hellenic World|date=March 10, 2005|url=http://asiaminor.ehw.gr/Forms/fLemma.aspx?lemmaid=6797&contlang=58|access-date=16 June 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811221041/http://asiaminor.ehw.gr/Forms/fLemma.aspx?lemmaid=6797&contlang=58|archive-date=11 August 2011}}
{{refend}} {{refend}}


Line 63: Line 64:


{{coord|40.5|39.5|dim:200km|display=title}} {{coord|40.5|39.5|dim:200km|display=title}}
]

] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 23:59, 22 October 2024

Historical region of Anatolia Not to be confused with Chaldea.
Theme of ChaldiaΧαλδία, θέμα Χαλδίας
Theme of the Byzantine Empire
c. 820/840–1091/1095
1098–1126
1140–1204

Map of the administrative structure of the Byzantine Empire in 842. Chaldia's strategic location in the north-easternmost corner of the Empire is evident.
CapitalTrapezus
Historical eraMiddle Ages
• Establishment as a theme c. 820/840
• Autonomy from Byzantine rule after Seljuk incursions 1091/1095–1098
• Rebellion of Constantine Gabras 1126–1140
• Autonomy from Byzantine rule after Fourth Crusade 1204
• Fall to the Ottomans 1461

Chaldia (Greek: Χαλδία, Khaldia) was a historical region located in the mountainous interior of the eastern Black Sea, northeast Anatolia (modern Turkey). Its name was derived from a people called the Chaldoi (or Chalybes) that inhabited the region in antiquity. Chaldia was used throughout the Byzantine period and was established as a formal theme, known as the Theme of Chaldia (Greek: θέμα Χαλδίας), by 840. During the Late Middle Ages, it formed the core of the Empire of Trebizond until its fall to the Ottoman Empire in 1461.

Anthony Bryer traces the origin of its name not to Chaldea, as Constantine VII had done, but to the Urartian language, for whose speakers Ḫaldi was the Sun God. Bryer notes at the time of his writing that a number of villages in the Of district were still known as "Halt". Other scholars, however, reject the Urartian connection. Χάλυψ, the tribe's name in Greek, means "tempered iron, steel", a term that passed into Latin as chalybs, "steel". Sayce derived the Greek name Chalybe from Hittite Khaly-wa, "land of Halys". More than an identifiable people or tribe, "Chalybes" was a generic Greek term for "peoples of the Black Sea coast who trade in iron".

Geography

Initially, the name Chaldia was consigned to the highland region around Gümüşhane, in northeast Anatolia, but in the middle Byzantine period, the name was extended to include the coastal areas, and thus the entire province around Trapezus (Trebizond, modern Trabzon). Forming the easternmost area of the Pontic Alps, Chaldia was bounded to the north by the Black Sea, to the east by Lazica, the westernmost part of Caucasian Iberia, to the south by Erzincan, Erzurum and what the Romans and Byzantines called Armenia Minor, and to the west by the western half of Pontus. Its main cities were the two ancient Greek colonies, Kerasus (modern Giresun) and Trapezus, situated in the coastal lowlands. The mountainous interior to the south, known as Mesochaldia ("Middle Chaldia"), was more sparsely inhabited and described by the 6th-century historian Procopius as "inaccessible", but rich in mineral deposits, especially lead, but also silver and gold. The mines of the region gave the name Argyropolis ("silver town", modern Gümüşhane) to the principal settlement .

History

The one surviving word from the Chaldian language, Kakamar (the Chaldian name for the Black Sea), points toward an Indo-European connection. Strabo identifies the Chaldians with the ancient people of Chalybia and describes them as rough and warlike. The first local inhabitants, the Chalybes, were counted among the earliest ironsmith nations by Classical writers. Indeed, the Greek name for steel is chalybas (Greek: χάλυβας), possibly deriving from them. According to Apollonius of Rhodes, the Chalybes were Scythians. The first Greek colony was that of Trapezus, founded by Greek traders from Miletus, traditionally dated to 756 BC. Greek colonization was restricted to the coast, and in later ages Roman control remained likewise only nominal over the tribes of the interior.

The coastal regions, however, belonged to the Roman province of Pontus Polemoniacus. Only during the reign of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I (r. 527–565) were the warlike tribes, the Sannoi or Tzannoi, subdued, Christianized, and brought under central rule. Justinian included the entire region in the newly constituted province of Armenia I Magna with Trapezus as its capital (under Emperor Maurice, it was renamed Armenia III).

In the second half of the 7th century, with the establishment of the theme system, the region (Pontus Polemoniacus with the portion of Armenia I known as Keltzene) became part of the Armeniac Theme, initially as the tourma (division) of Chaldia, and later as a semi-distinct duchy (doukaton) or archontate. By 840, and perhaps as early as 824, it was constituted as a theme in its own right. Arab geographers of the 9th and 10th centuries report differently on the theme: Ibn Khordadbeh reports that it counted six fortified places, Qudama ibn Ja'far that its troops numbered 4,000, while Ibn al-Faqih writes that its governing strategos commanded 10,000 men (certainly exaggerated) and had two subordinate tourmarchai. According to 10th-century documents, the strategos of Chaldia received twenty pounds of gold as an annual salary, of which half was paid by the state treasury and the rest came from the tax proceeds of his province, including the kommerkion tax on the important trade routes from the East that converged on Trapezus. In the early 10th century, the theme's southern portion, the district of Keltzene, was detached and added to the newly established theme of Mesopotamia.

Until the eastern gains in the latter 10th century, Chaldia remained the northeastern frontier of the Byzantine Empire. During the periods 1091/1095–1098 and 1126–1140, the theme was practically autonomous from the Byzantine government. During the first period, under its doux, Theodore Gabras, the region had been cut off from the remaining Byzantine territories by the Seljuk Turks, while during the second period, doux Constantine Gabras had rebelled against Emperor John II Komnenos. After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the Empire of Nicaea, and the Despotate of Epirus. A third, the Empire of Trebizond, was created after Alexios Komnenos, commanding the Georgian expedition in Chaldia a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople, found himself de facto emperor, and established himself in Trebizond. Indeed, by the 14th century, the Empire was reduced practically to the territory of the old theme. The Empire of Trebizond managed to survive through successive upheavals by a combination of its inaccessible location, a small but capable army, and a sound diplomacy based on marriage alliances, before finally falling to the Ottomans in 1461. Even thereafter, isolated fortresses in the interior continued to resist. Only in 1479 was the region subdued, when the castle of Golacha, the last remaining Christian stronghold in Asia Minor, fell. Significant numbers of Pontic Greeks remained in the region throughout the Ottoman period, until the 1923 population exchange between Greece and Turkey.

References

  1. Anthony Bryer, "Greeks and Türkmens: The Pontic Exception", Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 29 (1975), p. 116f
  2. The Greek Colonisation of the Black Sea Area p. 74
  3. I. M. Diakonoff The Pre-history of the Armenian People, Yerevan, 1968 (Delmar, New York, 1984) ISBN 9780882060392. "The Greeks evidently used the name Chalybes for all of the inhabitants of the Pontus who traded in iron ore (see Pauly, s.v. Chalybes); in some cases we might suspect that the Moschi (in Pontus) and/or the Chalybes were foreign designations for the Chaldians (Halitu, Xaghtik') who actually did live between the Tibareni in the west, the Mosynoeci in the north, and the Matieni in the southeast."
  4. ^ Talbert 2000, p. 1226.
  5. Robert H. Hewsen. Armenia: A Historical Atlas. University of Chicago Press. 2001.
  6. Jones, H.L. (ed.), Strabo, Geography (Loeb, New York 1917-1932), 548.18, 549.19.
  7. "Ancient Georgian iron metallurgy and its ore base" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-19. Retrieved 2013-07-15.
  8. Smith 1854, p. 602.
  9. Apollonius Rhodius. Tr. by R. Merkel, by Edward P. Coleridge. The Argonautica. pp. 49, 65.
  10. Evans 2000, p. 93.
  11. ^ Pertusi 1952, p. 138
  12. ^ McGeer, Nesbitt & Oikonomides 2001, p. 85
  13. Treadgold 1995, p. 31.
  14. Pertusi 1952, pp. 138–139
  15. Pertusi 1952, p. 139
  16. A. A. Vasiliev, "The Foundation of the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1222)", Speculum, 11 (1936), pp. 18f
  17. Treadgold 1997, p. 817.

Sources

Further reading

Themes of the Byzantine Empire according to De Thematibus (c. 950)
Eastern or Asian themes
Western or European themes
Thrace and Macedonia were counted among the Eastern themes for hierarchical purposes

40°30′N 39°30′E / 40.5°N 39.5°E / 40.5; 39.5

Categories: