Misplaced Pages

Talk:One America News Network: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:45, 26 July 2019 editBattleshipGray (talk | contribs)88 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:39, 7 January 2025 edit undoNewslinger (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators63,047 edits Far-right: ReplyTags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Reply 
(813 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stt}}
{{Warning RS and OR}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}
{{COI editnotice|track=yes}} {{COI editnotice|track=yes}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject Television|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject California|class=start|importance=low}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=start|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject California|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low|television-stations=yes|television-stations-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low|USTV=yes|USTV-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |American=yes |American-importance=low}}
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(90d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:One America News Network/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:One America News Network/Archive %(counter)d
|counter = 1 |counter = 2
|maxarchivesize = 150K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|archiveheader = {{tan}} |archiveheader = {{tan}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadsleft = 3
}} }}
{{auto archiving notice {{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap|long}}
{{refideas
|bot = lowercase sigmabot III
|1={{cite journal |last1=Butler |first1=Jack |title=Don't Watch One America News Network: A report from someone who has, to his regret |journal=] |date=August 10, 2020 |volume=72 |issue=14 |pages=28-30 |publisher=] |issn=0028-0038}}
|age = 90
|small=
}} }}
{{connpaid|User1=Saad Ahmed2983|U1-employer=Unlinked Corp|U1-otherlinks=See ].}}
{{reqphoto}}


== Ryan Girdusky ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2019 ==


] redirects here, but is not explained in the article. Should he be mentioned, or should the redirect be deleted? I was checking to see if there was coverage in Misplaced Pages of . -- ] (]) 00:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected|One America News Network|answered=yes}}
No page found for "KlowdTX" or "Klowd TV" although broken link exists on this page (OANN). I believe it should exist under Category of Broadband TV. ] (]) 16:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


:I too was redirected to this article after searching on "Ryan Girdusky", to find no mention of him at all on the page. I second the request to delete the redirect. ] (]) 00:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
:I have removed the mention, as the reference was KlowdTV's website. Misplaced Pages isn't a directory for non-notable commercial services. If a reliable, independent source exists, this could be restored with that as context. ] (]) 03:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
::The redirect has been deleted. -- ] (]) 03:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
== Far-right ==


The channel is not far-right. It is conservative. ] (]) 23:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
== Request edit on 13 May 2019 ==


:This is well supported. Our opinions don't matter. See the FAQ at the top of this page. ] (]) 01:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
<!-- PLEASE READ: Please provide your requested edit after the {{request edit}} below in a roughly "replace X with Y" format. Explain the rationale behind the edit and provide reliable sources to support the proposed changes. At the end of the request, add four tildes "~~~~" and click "Save Page" -->
::The fact that it is called "far right," which is a collective option of only the far left, should be a matter of concern. This is an opinion, and an inaccurate one. The channel is right of center, but the far left doesn't understand that. ] (]) 05:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Per the FAQ at the top of the page, {{xt|"the 'far-right' descriptor is ]. A ] resulted in unambiguous consensus to support the 'far-right' descriptor based on ], ] ] sources."}} See also the article (citation #1), which OANN published on its own website. —&nbsp;''''']'''&nbsp;<small>]</small>'' 06:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2024 ==
{{"The channel has also been noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories."
The first citation links to a page that does not support this claim in any way.}}


{{edit semi-protected|One America News Network|answered=yes}}
<!-- Do NOT remove this line! --><sub>(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added ].)</sub><!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>
Please change the following:
:Well, it does state: {{tq|Jack Posobiec, an on-air reporter for the conservative channel One America News Network, which often promotes conspiracy theories....}} ] (]) 17:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|Murandin}} pardon? Quoting, "Jack Posobiec, an on-air reporter for the conservative channel One America News Network, which often promotes conspiracy theories". We know that it is talking about the network, as it uses a "which" as opposed to a "who", the latter of which would have been used if the description was being attached to Posobiec.--] (]) 17:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
:That is stated in the article, but there is no support given for that statement. It is only given as an off-hand comment, which is itself inappropriate in the context of the article as the story on which OANN reported was correct in this case. ] (]) 17:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|Murandin}} right. That the One America News reporter (Jack Posobiec) was correct in reporting on a story does not change the description (quoted above) the article attaches to One America News. More importantly, please note that Misplaced Pages is built upon sources considered to be ]; ''Vanity Fair'' is one of these reliable sources, as we can assume its editorial staff and writers do their due diligence. Should you think the article is lacking, the exchequer is on you to bring the matter before the ] and have the article in question declared to be unreliable. You can also contact the author or Vanity Fair and ask them to retract the article. Pending one of these actions being undertaken, the source is considered reliable per policy. ] (]) 18:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


In December 2024, following disgraced former Congressman Matt Gaetz's withdrawal from his nomination to United States Attorney General by Donald Trump due to allegations of sexual assault, it was announced that Gaetz would be joining OAN to host a new show every weekday starting in January 2025.
== Can someone add archiving? ==


to this:
There are four-year old discussions on the page. ] (]) 22:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 22:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


In December 2024, following former Congressman Matt Gaetz's withdrawal from his nomination to United States Attorney General by Donald Trump due to allegations of sexual assault, it was announced that Gaetz would be joining OAN to host a new show every weekday starting in January 2025. ] (]) 09:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
== Pro-Trump ==
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Seemed undue at this time, as I noted in the edit description. ] (]) 18:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
The statement that OAN is "pro-Trump" is not appropriate in the lede (or arguably anywhere in the article). Does the article about MSNBC describe the network as "pro-Obama" or "pro-Hillary Clinton"? This language should be removed. -] (]) 03:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
:{{replyto|BattleshipGray}} Do reliable sources claim this about MSNBC? ] (]) 03:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
::Did you see MSNBC's coverage of the 2016 election, with Rachel Meadow crying as she stated how shocking and horrible it was that Hillary was losing, and then lost, the election? Yes, of course, reliable sources claim MSNBC is left-wing and pro-Hillary Clinton and pro-Obama. -] (]) 03:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:39, 7 January 2025

Skip to table of contents

Before requesting any edits to this protected article, please familiarise yourself with reliable sourcing requirements.

Before posting an edit request on this talk page, please read the reliable sourcing and original research policies. These policies require that information in Misplaced Pages articles be supported by citations from reliable independent sources, and disallow your personal views, observations, interpretations, analyses, or anecdotes from being used.

Only content verified by subject experts and other reliable sources may be included, and uncited material may be removed without notice. If your complaint is about an assertion made in the article, check first to see if your proposed change is supported by reliable sources. If it is not, it is highly unlikely that your request will be granted. Checking the archives for previous discussions may provide more information. Requests which do not provide citations from reliable sources, or rely on unreliable sources, may be subject to closure without any other response.

? view · edit Frequently asked questions
Q: Should this article describe OANN as far-right?
A: Yes, the "far-right" descriptor is amply and reliably sourced. A prior request for comment resulted in unambiguous consensus to support the "far-right" descriptor based on reliable, independent secondary sources.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One America News Network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconCalifornia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTelevision: Stations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconJournalism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Television Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconPolitics: American Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Upload

Ryan Girdusky

Ryan Girdusky redirects here, but is not explained in the article. Should he be mentioned, or should the redirect be deleted? I was checking to see if there was coverage in Misplaced Pages of his banning from CNN. -- Beland (talk) 00:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I too was redirected to this article after searching on "Ryan Girdusky", to find no mention of him at all on the page. I second the request to delete the redirect. 2602:306:C4CE:91A9:397A:B764:372:1D33 (talk) 00:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
The redirect has been deleted. -- Beland (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Far-right

The channel is not far-right. It is conservative. 68.162.214.184 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This is well supported. Our opinions don't matter. See the FAQ at the top of this page. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
The fact that it is called "far right," which is a collective option of only the far left, should be a matter of concern. This is an opinion, and an inaccurate one. The channel is right of center, but the far left doesn't understand that. 2601:6C1:503:2F00:65AF:C4FC:7E27:2D14 (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Per the FAQ at the top of the page, "the 'far-right' descriptor is amply and reliably sourced. A prior request for comment resulted in unambiguous consensus to support the 'far-right' descriptor based on reliable, independent secondary sources." See also the article "DirecTV to drop far-right channel OAN from its service" (citation #1), which OANN published on its own website. — Newslinger talk 06:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the following:

In December 2024, following disgraced former Congressman Matt Gaetz's withdrawal from his nomination to United States Attorney General by Donald Trump due to allegations of sexual assault, it was announced that Gaetz would be joining OAN to host a new show every weekday starting in January 2025.

to this:

In December 2024, following former Congressman Matt Gaetz's withdrawal from his nomination to United States Attorney General by Donald Trump due to allegations of sexual assault, it was announced that Gaetz would be joining OAN to host a new show every weekday starting in January 2025. Bbpwnt (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done Seemed undue at this time, as I noted in the edit description. LizardJr8 (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: