Misplaced Pages

Ptyctodontida: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:50, 27 July 2019 editRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,386 edits Removing link(s) / list item(s): Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mikko's Phylogeny Archive closed as delete (XFDcloser)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:34, 22 December 2024 edit undoJlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,655 edits removed Category:Prehistoric fish orders; added Category:Placoderm orders using HotCat 
(24 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Extinct order of fishes}}
{{Taxobox
{{Automatic taxobox
| fossil_range = {{Fossil range|Early Devonian|Late Devonian}} | fossil_range = {{Fossil range|Devonian}}
| image = Rhamphodopsis threiplandi.jpg | image = Rhamphodopsis threiplandi.jpg
| image_caption = Reconstruction of ''] threiplandi'' | image_caption = Reconstruction of ''] threiplandi''
| parent_authority = Gross, 1932
| regnum = ]ia
| taxon = Ptyctodontidae
| phylum = ]
| authority = Woodward, 1891
| classis = ]
| ordo = '''Ptyctodontida'''
| ordo_authority = Gross, 1932
| familia = '''Ptyctodontidae'''
| familia_authority =
| subdivision_ranks = Genera | subdivision_ranks = Genera
| subdivision = '']''<br /><!-- Biol. Lett. (2007) 3, 197–200 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0604 -->
| subdivision =
'']''<br /><!-- Biol. Lett. (2007) 3, 197–200 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0604 -->
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
Line 20: Line 16:
'']'' <!-- incl. Acantholepis, Oracanthus, Phlyctaenacanthus --><br /> '']'' <!-- incl. Acantholepis, Oracanthus, Phlyctaenacanthus --><br />
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
'']''<br />
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
'']'' <!-- incl. Rhynchodus (?) --><br /> '']'' <!-- incl. Rhynchodus (?) --><br />
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
'']'' <!-- incl. Aulacosteus, Paraptyctodus, Rinodus --><br /> '']'' <!-- incl. Aulacosteus, Paraptyctodus, Rinodus --><br />
'']''<br /> '']''<br />
Line 28: Line 25:
}} }}


The '''ptyctodontids''' ("folded-teeth") are ]s of the ] '''Ptyctodontida''', containing the ] '''Ptyctodontidae'''. With their big heads, big eyes, reduced armor and long bodies, the ptyctodontids bore a superficial resemblance to modern day chimaeras (]). Their armor was reduced to a pattern of small plates around the head and neck. Like the extinct and related ], and the living and unrelated holocephalians, most of the ptyctodontids are thought to have lived near the sea bottom and preyed on ]. The '''ptyctodontids''' ("folded-teeth") are ]s of the ] '''Ptyctodontida''', containing the ] '''Ptyctodontidae'''. With their big heads, big eyes, reduced armor and long bodies, the ptyctodontids bore a superficial resemblance to modern day chimaeras (]). Their armor was reduced to a pattern of small plates around the head and neck. Like the extinct and related ], and the living and unrelated ], most of the ptyctodontids are thought to have lived near the sea bottom and preyed on ].


On account of their radically reduced armor, some paleontologists have suggested that the Ptyctodontida were not actually placoderms, but actual holocephalians, some primitive group of ] fish, or even were the ancestors of the holocephalians, including the chimaeras. Thorough anatomical examinations of whole fossil specimens reveal that the profound similarities between these two groups are actually very superficial. The major differences between them were that holocephalians have ] on their skin and ptyctodontids did not, that the armored plates and scales of holocephalians are made of ], and the armored plates and scales of ptyctodontids were made of bone, the anatomy of the craniums of holocephalians is more similar to sharks, and that of ptyctodontids were more similar to those of other placoderms, and, most importantly, the holocephalians have true teeth, while the ptyctodonts had beak-like tooth-plates. On account of their radically reduced armor, some paleontologists have suggested that the Ptyctodontida were not actually placoderms, but actual holocephalians, some primitive group of ] fish, or even were the ancestors of the holocephalians, including the chimaeras. Thorough anatomical examinations of whole fossil specimens reveal that the profound similarities between these two groups are actually very superficial. The major differences between them were that holocephalians have ] on their skin and ptyctodontids did not, that the armored plates and scales of holocephalians are made of ], and the armored plates and scales of ptyctodontids were made of bone, the anatomy of the craniums of holocephalians is more similar to sharks, and that of ptyctodontids were more similar to those of other placoderms, and, most importantly, the holocephalians have true teeth, while the ptyctodonts had beak-like tooth-plates.
Line 34: Line 31:
The Ptyctodontida were the only known group of placoderms that were recognizably ], in that the males had hook-like growths on their pelvic fins that were analogous to the clasping organs found in male sharks, and chimaeras. Paleontologists believe that the males of the ancestral placoderm had pelvic claspers, but the claspers were lost in the evolutionary development of each of the placoderm orders, save for the ptyctodontids (there are too few whole specimens of the primitive '']'' to tell if the males of that species had claspers or not). The Ptyctodontida were the only known group of placoderms that were recognizably ], in that the males had hook-like growths on their pelvic fins that were analogous to the clasping organs found in male sharks, and chimaeras. Paleontologists believe that the males of the ancestral placoderm had pelvic claspers, but the claspers were lost in the evolutionary development of each of the placoderm orders, save for the ptyctodontids (there are too few whole specimens of the primitive '']'' to tell if the males of that species had claspers or not).


Because they had reduced armor, the ptyctodontids were once thought to be the most primitive of the placoderms. Indeed, there has been the idea that the placoderms had a gradient, of sorts, from the least armored, and most primitive forms, to the heavily armored, most advanced forms. During the 1980s and '90's, ptyctodont skulls were compared with skulls from other orders. From these analysises, this idea of a gradient from least armored to most armored in placoderms was discarded. Now, the ptyctodonts are regarded as the sister group of the ] and ]. Because they had reduced armor, the ptyctodontids were once thought to be the most primitive of the placoderms. Indeed, there has been the idea that the placoderms had a gradient, of sorts, from the least armored, and most primitive forms, to the heavily armored, most advanced forms. During the 1980s and '90's, ptyctodont skulls were compared with skulls from other orders. From these analyses, this idea of a gradient from least armored to most armored in placoderms was discarded. Now, the ptyctodonts are regarded as the sister group of the ] and ].


==Timeline of genera== ==Timeline of genera==
Line 149: Line 146:


</timeline> </timeline>

==Gallery==
<gallery>
Image:Gamphacanthus.jpg|Fin spine of the ptyctodont, ''Gamphacanthus'', showing color patterns; from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin.
Image:Ptyctodus ferox.jpg|Tooth plates from the ptyctodont ''Ptyctodus ferox'', from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin. Note the grinding surfaces.
Image:Ptyctodont tooth plate.jpg|Beak-like tooth plate of a ptyctodont from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin.
</gallery>


== References == == References ==
Line 156: Line 160:
| last = Sepkoski | last = Sepkoski
| first = Jack | first = Jack
| authorlink =
| coauthors =
| title = A compendium of fossil marine animal genera (Placodermi entry) | title = A compendium of fossil marine animal genera (Placodermi entry)
| journal = Bulletins of American Paleontology | journal = Bulletins of American Paleontology
| volume = 364 | volume = 364
| issue =
|page=560 |page=560
| publisher =
| location =
| year = 2002 | year = 2002
| url = http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=564&rank=class | url = http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=564&rank=class
| access-date = 2011-05-20}}
| doi =
{{Placodermi|Pt.}}
| id =
{{Taxonbar|from1=Q918188|from2=Q18618797}}
| accessdate = 2011-05-20}}
{{placodermi}}
{{Taxonbar|from=Q918188}}


] ]
Line 177: Line 174:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 05:34, 22 December 2024

Extinct order of fishes

Ptyctodontida
Temporal range: Devonian PreꞒ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Reconstruction of Rhamphodopsis threiplandi
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Placodermi
Order: Ptyctodontida
Gross, 1932
Family: Ptyctodontidae
Woodward, 1891
Genera

Austroptyctodus
Campbellodus
Chelyophorus
Ctenurella
Deinodus
Destnoporella
Eczematolepis
Goniosteus
Kimbryanodus
Materpiscis
Palaeomylus
Ptyctodopsis
Ptyctodus
Rhamphodopsis
Rhynchodus

The ptyctodontids ("folded-teeth") are placoderms of the order Ptyctodontida, containing the family Ptyctodontidae. With their big heads, big eyes, reduced armor and long bodies, the ptyctodontids bore a superficial resemblance to modern day chimaeras (Holocephali). Their armor was reduced to a pattern of small plates around the head and neck. Like the extinct and related acanthothoracids, and the living and unrelated holocephalians, most of the ptyctodontids are thought to have lived near the sea bottom and preyed on shellfish.

On account of their radically reduced armor, some paleontologists have suggested that the Ptyctodontida were not actually placoderms, but actual holocephalians, some primitive group of elasmobranch fish, or even were the ancestors of the holocephalians, including the chimaeras. Thorough anatomical examinations of whole fossil specimens reveal that the profound similarities between these two groups are actually very superficial. The major differences between them were that holocephalians have shagreen on their skin and ptyctodontids did not, that the armored plates and scales of holocephalians are made of dentine, and the armored plates and scales of ptyctodontids were made of bone, the anatomy of the craniums of holocephalians is more similar to sharks, and that of ptyctodontids were more similar to those of other placoderms, and, most importantly, the holocephalians have true teeth, while the ptyctodonts had beak-like tooth-plates.

The Ptyctodontida were the only known group of placoderms that were recognizably sexually dimorphic, in that the males had hook-like growths on their pelvic fins that were analogous to the clasping organs found in male sharks, and chimaeras. Paleontologists believe that the males of the ancestral placoderm had pelvic claspers, but the claspers were lost in the evolutionary development of each of the placoderm orders, save for the ptyctodontids (there are too few whole specimens of the primitive Stensioella heintzi to tell if the males of that species had claspers or not).

Because they had reduced armor, the ptyctodontids were once thought to be the most primitive of the placoderms. Indeed, there has been the idea that the placoderms had a gradient, of sorts, from the least armored, and most primitive forms, to the heavily armored, most advanced forms. During the 1980s and '90's, ptyctodont skulls were compared with skulls from other orders. From these analyses, this idea of a gradient from least armored to most armored in placoderms was discarded. Now, the ptyctodonts are regarded as the sister group of the Arthrodira and Phyllolepida.

Timeline of genera

DevonianFamennianFrasnianGivetianEifelianEmsianPragianLochkovianRhynchodusPtyctodusPalaeomylusEczematolepisChelyophorusPtyctodopsisDenisonodusCtenurellaCampbellodusDesmoporellaGoniosteusTollodusDevonianFamennianFrasnianGivetianEifelianEmsianPragianLochkovian

Gallery

  • Fin spine of the ptyctodont, Gamphacanthus, showing color patterns; from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin. Fin spine of the ptyctodont, Gamphacanthus, showing color patterns; from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin.
  • Tooth plates from the ptyctodont Ptyctodus ferox, from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin. Note the grinding surfaces. Tooth plates from the ptyctodont Ptyctodus ferox, from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin. Note the grinding surfaces.
  • Beak-like tooth plate of a ptyctodont from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin. Beak-like tooth plate of a ptyctodont from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin.

References

"Placodermi"
Gnathostomata
Placodermi
    • see below↓
Placodermi
Acanthothoraci*
Palaeacanthaspidae*
Weejasperaspididae
Palaeacanthaspis vasta
Petalichthyida
Quasipetalichthyidae
Macropetalichthyidae
Ptyctodontida
Rhenanida
Antiarchi
Arthrodira
Others
"maxillate placoderms"
  • Category
  • Taxon identifiers
    Ptyctodontida
    Ptyctodontidae
    Categories: