Revision as of 21:24, 12 August 2019 editJesseRafe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users71,491 editsm update WL← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:27, 25 October 2024 edit undoEcangola (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users94,232 edits →Criticism and challenges: fmtTag: Visual edit | ||
(34 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Nightlife legislation}} | |||
⚫ | The '''New York City Cabaret Law''' was a ] originally enacted in 1926, during ],<ref>{{cite web|title=Text of 1926 Cabaret Law As enacted|url=http://zortmusic.com/CabaretLaw/Resources/December%2026%201926%20Cabaret%20Law%20As%20Enacted.pdf|website |
||
{{Infobox legislation | |||
|short_title = New York City Cabaret Law | |||
|long_title = New York City Cabaret Law | |||
|citation = | |||
|territorial_extent = ] | |||
|enacted_by = ] | |||
|date_enacted = 1926 | |||
|date_commenced = | |||
|date_repealed = October 31, 2017 | |||
⚫ | |administered_by = ] | ||
|bill_date = | |||
|introduced_by = | |||
|1st_reading = | |||
|2nd_reading = | |||
|3rd_reading = | |||
|amended_by = | |||
|repealed_by = | |||
|status = repealed | |||
}} | |||
⚫ | The '''New York City Cabaret Law''' was a ] originally enacted in 1926, during ],<ref>{{cite web|title=Text of 1926 Cabaret Law As enacted|url=http://zortmusic.com/CabaretLaw/Resources/December%2026%201926%20Cabaret%20Law%20As%20Enacted.pdf|website=Zort Music|accessdate=24 September 2017}}</ref> and repealed in 2017.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Correal|first1=Annie|title=After 91 Years, New York Will Let Its People Boogie|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/nyregion/new-york-cabaret-law-repeal.html|website=The New York Times|date=30 October 2017 |accessdate=31 October 2017}}</ref> It referred to the prohibition of dancing in all ] spaces open to the public selling food and/or drink unless they had obtained a cabaret license. It prohibited "musical entertainment, singing, dancing or other form of amusement" without a license.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/dca/downloads/pdf/about/cabarets_catering_law_rules.pdf|title=NYC Cabaret Law text}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | Critics argued that the license was expensive and difficult to obtain and that enforcement was arbitrary and weaponized against ],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.vibe.com/2017/04/nyc-law-prevents-dancing/|title=Historically Racist NYC Law That Prevents Dancing In Bars Is Being Petitioned|last=Pickens|first=Ashley|date=2017-04-03|work=Vibe|access-date=2017-04-15 |
||
⚫ | Critics argued that the license was expensive and difficult to obtain and that enforcement was arbitrary and weaponized against ],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.vibe.com/2017/04/nyc-law-prevents-dancing/|title=Historically Racist NYC Law That Prevents Dancing In Bars Is Being Petitioned|last=Pickens|first=Ashley|date=2017-04-03|work=Vibe|access-date=2017-04-15}}</ref> but proponents insisted that the law minimized noise complaints.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.metro.us/new-york/ninety-years-and-counting-for-new-york-city-s-outdated-cabaret-law/zsJpcu---RqCu3QF0D5HQQ/|title=Ninety years and counting for New York City's outdated cabaret law|last=krawitz|first=alan|date=2016-03-22|work=Metro|access-date=2017-03-12|language=en}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | |||
At the time of the 2017 repeal of the law, after amendments over the years, the law required a license for cabarets, defined as: | |||
<blockquote>A Cabaret License is required for any business that sells food and / or beverages to the public and allows patron dancing in a room, place, or space.<ref name="Chevigny">{{Cite web|url=https://www1.nyc.gov/nycbusiness/description/cabaret-license|title=Cabaret License - NYC Business|website=www1.nyc.gov|access-date=2017-03-12}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
3. "Cabaret." Any room, place or space in the city in which any | |||
musical entertainment, singing, dancing or other form of amusement is | |||
permitted in connection with the restaurant business or the business of | |||
directly or indirectly selling to the public food or drink, except | |||
eating or drinking places, which provide incidental musical | |||
entertainment, without dancing, either by mechanical devices, or by not | |||
more than three persons.<ref name="2017 Cabaret Law">{{cite web |title=TITLE 20: CONSUMER AFFAIRS:2017 Cabaret Law |url=http://zortmusic.com/CabaretLaw/Resources/Cabaret%20Law%202017.pdf}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
The New York City Cabaret Law was passed in 1926, during the ]. An attorney and professor challenging the cabaret law wrote that the law originally targeted ]s in ] and the social mixing of races,<ref>{{Cite book|url= |
The New York City Cabaret Law was passed in 1926, during the ]. An attorney and professor challenging the cabaret law wrote that the law originally targeted ]s in ] and the social mixing of races,<ref name="Chevigny">{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/809084872|title=Gigs: jazz and the cabaret laws in New York City|last=Chevigny|first=Paul|date=2012-01-01|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9780415648004|location=London|oclc=809084872|language=English}}</ref> but a historian of the period rejects the view and said there is "little evidence" for that to be the case.<ref name="Lerner">{{cite book|last1=Lerner|first1=Michael A.|title=Dry Manhattan Prohibition in New York City|date=2008|publisher=Harvard University Press|chapter=Chapter 6|isbn=9780674030572|url=http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674030572}}</ref> | ||
In proposing the law, the Committee on Local Laws argued that "there has been altogether too much running 'wild' in some of these night clubs and, in the judgement of your Committee, the 'wild' stranger and the foolish native should have the check-rein applied a little bit."<ref>Proceedings of Bd. of Aldermen Mun. Assembly of City of New York, Recommendation No. 10, Dec. 7, 1926, at 572</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/20/nyregion/cabaret-law-decades-old-faces-repeal.html|title=Cabaret Law, Decades Old, Faces Repeal|date=20 November 2003|website=The New York Times|accessdate=29 September 2017}}</ref> In referring to "running wild," the 1926 Committee may have been alluding to the popular 1920s song "]", which popularized the ] dance. | In proposing the law, the Committee on Local Laws argued that "there has been altogether too much running 'wild' in some of these night clubs and, in the judgement of your Committee, the 'wild' stranger and the foolish native should have the check-rein applied a little bit."<ref>Proceedings of Bd. of Aldermen Mun. Assembly of City of New York, Recommendation No. 10, Dec. 7, 1926, at 572</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/20/nyregion/cabaret-law-decades-old-faces-repeal.html|title=Cabaret Law, Decades Old, Faces Repeal|date=20 November 2003|website=The New York Times|accessdate=29 September 2017}}</ref> In referring to "running wild," the 1926 Committee may have been alluding to the popular 1920s song "]", which popularized the ] dance. | ||
From 1940 to 1967, the ] issued regulations requiring musicians and other employees in cabarets to obtain a ], and musicians such as ], ], ], and ] had their right to perform suspended.<ref name="Chevigny" />{{rp|p. |
From 1940 to 1967, the ] issued regulations requiring musicians and other employees in cabarets to obtain a ], and musicians such as ], ], ], and ] had their right to perform suspended. | ||
<ref name="Chevigny" />{{rp|p.57-68}} | |||
In 1971, the Cabaret Law was modified to exempt musical performance "by not more than three persons playing piano, organ, accordion or guitar or any stringed instrument," which disproportionately affected jazz since drums, reeds, and horns were not allowed, as was stated in the ''Chiasson I'' case<ref name="Chiasson 1" />{{rp|p.643}} and the Chevigny book.<ref name="Chevigny" />{{rp|p.14}} The so-called three-musician rule was not found in the original 1926 text of the bill. | In 1971, the Cabaret Law was modified to exempt musical performance "by not more than three persons playing piano, organ, accordion or guitar or any stringed instrument," which disproportionately affected jazz since drums, reeds, and horns were not allowed, as was stated in the ''Chiasson I'' case<ref name="Chiasson 1" />{{rp|p.643}} and the Chevigny book.<ref name="Chevigny" />{{rp|p.14}} The so-called three-musician rule was not found in the original 1926 text of the bill. | ||
Throughout its history, the law was selectively enforced with its most notable enforcer, former mayor ], resurrecting the dormant rule as part of his implementation of ] to fine and shut down perceived nuisance bars in the late 1990s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thirteen.org/nyvoices/features/license.html|title=NEW YORK VOICES: License To Dance {{!}} Thirteen / WNET New York|website=www.thirteen.org|access-date=2017-03-12}}</ref> | Throughout its history, the law was selectively enforced, with its most notable enforcer, former mayor ], resurrecting the dormant rule as part of his implementation of ] to fine and shut down perceived nuisance bars in the late 1990s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thirteen.org/nyvoices/features/license.html|title=NEW YORK VOICES: License To Dance {{!}} Thirteen / WNET New York|website=www.thirteen.org|access-date=2017-03-12}}</ref> | ||
== Cabaret licensing == | == Cabaret licensing == | ||
All applicants for a cabaret license had to be ]; to provide extensive financial records; to meet specific zoning, surveillance, physical security, fire, building, electrical, health, and record keeping requirements; and to pay the fees associated with each compliance. | All applicants for a cabaret license had to be ]; to provide extensive financial records; to meet specific zoning, surveillance, physical security, fire, building, electrical, health, and record keeping requirements; and to pay the fees associated with each compliance. | ||
In 2016, the ] claimed there were then 118 cabaret licenses in a city of 25,100 licensed food service establishments.<ref name="Muchmore Decision 1" /> | In 2016, the ] claimed there were then 118 cabaret licenses in a city of 25,100 licensed food service establishments.<ref name="Muchmore Decision 1" /> | ||
== Criticism and challenges == | == Criticism and challenges == | ||
The law was heavily criticized both by the general public and from within city government. | The law was heavily criticized both by the general public and from within city government. | ||
The limits on types of instruments were ruled unconstitutional in ''Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs'', 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986),<ref name="Chiasson 1">{{cite web|title=Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6267750996742241757&q=Chiasson+New+York&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> and the three-musician limit was found to be unconstitutional in a later decision in the same case in ''Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs'', 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988).<ref name="Chiasson 2">{{cite web|title=Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6267750996742241757&q=Chiasson+New+York&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> Although the code was |
The limits on types of instruments were ruled unconstitutional in ''Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs'', 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986),<ref name="Chiasson 1">{{cite web|title=Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6267750996742241757&q=Chiasson+New+York&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> and the three-musician limit was found to be unconstitutional in a later decision in the same case in ''Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs'', 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988).<ref name="Chiasson 2">{{cite web|title=Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6267750996742241757&q=Chiasson+New+York&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> Although the code was changed to reflect the ruling as to types of instrument, the text to reflect the elimination of the three-musician limit was not corrected in the text of the ]. | ||
A broader challenge to the Cabaret Law and New York City's Zoning Resolution under the New York State Constitution was rejected in ''John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair,'' 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006),<ref name="Festa">{{cite web|title=John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair, 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9600101090696953720&q=festa+new+york+city+consumer+affairs&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> but the court urged legislative review of the law and concluded, "Surely, the Big Apple is big enough to find a way to let people dance." | A broader challenge to the Cabaret Law and New York City's Zoning Resolution under the New York State Constitution was rejected in ''John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair,'' 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006),<ref name="Festa">{{cite web|title=John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair, 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006)|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9600101090696953720&q=festa+new+york+city+consumer+affairs&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33|website=Google Scholar}}</ref> but the court urged legislative review of the law and concluded, "Surely, the Big Apple is big enough to find a way to let people dance." | ||
In 2015, ] attorney and bar owner Andrew Muchmore filed a |
In 2015, ] attorney and bar owner Andrew Muchmore filed a case in the ] against the law, claiming it violated the ] and ] Amendments of the ].<ref name="Muchmore Docket">{{cite web |title=Muchmore's Cafe, LLC v. City of New York, No. 1:14-cv-05668) United States District Court, Eastern District New York |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4323733/muchmores-cafe-llc-v-city-of-new-york/}}</ref><ref name="Muchmore Decision 1">{{cite web|title=MUCHMORE'S CAFE, LLC V. CITY OF NEW YORK, Memorandum and Order, (EDNY 14-cv-05668, Doc. 27, September 29, 2016)|url=https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-05668/pdf/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-05668-0.pdf |location=GPO}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/life_is_a_cabaret_old_chum_but_first_you_need_a_license|title=NYC lawyer and bar owner sues over cabaret licensing requirement|work=ABA Journal|access-date=2017-03-12|language=en}}</ref> The Muchmore case challenged the Cabaret Law, but neither New York City's Zoning Resolution nor the regulation of dancing by the New York State Liquor Authority. | ||
In June of 2017, then-New York City Councilmember Rafael Espinal introduced a bill for the full repeal of the regulation citing its oppressive nature on NYC's residents on their rights to dance, the negative impacts on New York City's nighttime economy and its artist communities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Councilmember Rafael Espinal on why the Cabaret Law had to be repealed |url=https://www.timeout.com/newyork/nightlife/councilmember-rafael-espinal-on-why-the-cabaret-law-had-to-be-repealed |access-date=2024-10-25}}</ref> | |||
==Repeal== | ==Repeal== | ||
Several efforts were founded over time to repeal the cabaret law, including Legalize Dancing NYC in the early 2000's and Metropolis in Motion later in that decade. Both of those organizations worked to raise public awareness around the issue through a variety of actions, and worked in parallel with legal efforts to repeal the Cabaret Law. | |||
⚫ | In June |
||
In 2017, Dance Liberation Network was formed, co-founded by Frankie Decaiza Hutchinson of ]. They began the 'Let NYC Dance' movement to campaign for the repeal of the law.<ref>{{Cite web|title=How You Can Help End N.Y.C.'s Racist No-Dancing Law|url=https://www.thefader.com/2017/05/10/how-to-end-nyc-racist-no-dancing-law|access-date=2020-06-10|website=The FADER|language=en}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | In June, then-]member ] introduced a bill for the full repeal of the regulation.<ref>{{Cite web |url= http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3086319&GUID=6FDA3305-06B3-47B3-9DF6-21B605C5A8EE&Options=&Search= |title=The New York City Council Int. No. 1652 }}</ref> It was passed 44-1 by the City Council on October 31, 2017.<ref>{{cite web |title= Action Details Int 1652-2017 |url= http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3086319&GUID=6FDA3305-06B3-47B3-9DF6-21B605C5A8EE&Options=ID%7CText%7C&Search=cabaret+law |website= Legistar|publisher=New York City Council|date=October 31, 2017}}</ref> | ||
Notwithstanding the repeal of the licensing requirements of the Cabaret Law, under the City's ] Resolution, dancing is banned in the many areas of the City zoned residential or mixed-commercial-residential.<ref name="ZR Use Group 6">{{cite web |title=New York City Zoning Resolution, Chapter 2 - Use Regulations - §32-15 Use Group 6 |url=https://zr.planning.nyc.gov/article-iii/chapter-2}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|url=https://citylimits.org/2017/12/08/nighttime-nyc-laws-repeal-alone-wont-end-citys-dance-drought/|title=Nighttime NYC: Law's Repeal Alone Won't End City's Dance Drought|date=8 December 2017 |publisher=|accessdate=13 December 2017}}</ref> | |||
The City's ] enforces the Zoning Resolution and the ] (SLA) will terminate the license of venues serving alcohol and allowing dancing if the Method of Operation in the issued Liquor Permit does not allow dancing. The SLA cooperates with ] and will not issue licenses with dancing in areas where dancing is banned by the Zoning Resolution or if strongly opposed by the local board.<ref name="Liquor Licenses and Community Boards">{{cite web |title=Community Board Q & A |url=https://www1.nyc.gov/site/manhattancb3/applications-guidelines/nyc-regulations-regarding-dancing.page}}</ref> | |||
However, a venue can still be fined or closed by the city, as the law still requires the venue to be located in a ] that allows dancing.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://citylimits.org/2017/12/08/nighttime-nyc-laws-repeal-alone-wont-end-citys-dance-drought/|title=Nighttime NYC: Law's Repeal Alone Won't End City's Dance Drought|publisher=|accessdate=13 December 2017}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 46: | Line 85: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 25 October 2024
Nightlife legislationNew York City Cabaret Law | |
---|---|
New York City Council | |
Long title
| |
Territorial extent | New York City |
Enacted by | New York City Council |
Enacted | 1926 |
Repealed | October 31, 2017 |
Administered by | New York City Department of Consumer Affairs |
Status: Repealed |
The New York City Cabaret Law was a dancing ban originally enacted in 1926, during Prohibition, and repealed in 2017. It referred to the prohibition of dancing in all New York City spaces open to the public selling food and/or drink unless they had obtained a cabaret license. It prohibited "musical entertainment, singing, dancing or other form of amusement" without a license.
Critics argued that the license was expensive and difficult to obtain and that enforcement was arbitrary and weaponized against marginalized groups, but proponents insisted that the law minimized noise complaints.
At the time of the 2017 repeal of the law, after amendments over the years, the law required a license for cabarets, defined as:
3. "Cabaret." Any room, place or space in the city in which any musical entertainment, singing, dancing or other form of amusement is permitted in connection with the restaurant business or the business of directly or indirectly selling to the public food or drink, except eating or drinking places, which provide incidental musical entertainment, without dancing, either by mechanical devices, or by not more than three persons.
History
The New York City Cabaret Law was passed in 1926, during the Harlem Renaissance. An attorney and professor challenging the cabaret law wrote that the law originally targeted jazz clubs in Harlem and the social mixing of races, but a historian of the period rejects the view and said there is "little evidence" for that to be the case.
In proposing the law, the Committee on Local Laws argued that "there has been altogether too much running 'wild' in some of these night clubs and, in the judgement of your Committee, the 'wild' stranger and the foolish native should have the check-rein applied a little bit." In referring to "running wild," the 1926 Committee may have been alluding to the popular 1920s song "Runnin' Wild", which popularized the Charleston dance.
From 1940 to 1967, the New York Police Department issued regulations requiring musicians and other employees in cabarets to obtain a New York City Cabaret Card, and musicians such as Chet Baker, Charlie Parker, Thelonious Monk, and Billie Holiday had their right to perform suspended.
In 1971, the Cabaret Law was modified to exempt musical performance "by not more than three persons playing piano, organ, accordion or guitar or any stringed instrument," which disproportionately affected jazz since drums, reeds, and horns were not allowed, as was stated in the Chiasson I case and the Chevigny book. The so-called three-musician rule was not found in the original 1926 text of the bill.
Throughout its history, the law was selectively enforced, with its most notable enforcer, former mayor Rudy Giuliani, resurrecting the dormant rule as part of his implementation of broken windows policing to fine and shut down perceived nuisance bars in the late 1990s.
Cabaret licensing
All applicants for a cabaret license had to be fingerprinted; to provide extensive financial records; to meet specific zoning, surveillance, physical security, fire, building, electrical, health, and record keeping requirements; and to pay the fees associated with each compliance.
In 2016, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs claimed there were then 118 cabaret licenses in a city of 25,100 licensed food service establishments.
Criticism and challenges
The law was heavily criticized both by the general public and from within city government.
The limits on types of instruments were ruled unconstitutional in Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986), and the three-musician limit was found to be unconstitutional in a later decision in the same case in Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988). Although the code was changed to reflect the ruling as to types of instrument, the text to reflect the elimination of the three-musician limit was not corrected in the text of the New York City Administrative Code.
A broader challenge to the Cabaret Law and New York City's Zoning Resolution under the New York State Constitution was rejected in John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair, 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006), but the court urged legislative review of the law and concluded, "Surely, the Big Apple is big enough to find a way to let people dance."
In 2015, Brooklyn attorney and bar owner Andrew Muchmore filed a case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the law, claiming it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the US Constitution. The Muchmore case challenged the Cabaret Law, but neither New York City's Zoning Resolution nor the regulation of dancing by the New York State Liquor Authority.
In June of 2017, then-New York City Councilmember Rafael Espinal introduced a bill for the full repeal of the regulation citing its oppressive nature on NYC's residents on their rights to dance, the negative impacts on New York City's nighttime economy and its artist communities.
Repeal
Several efforts were founded over time to repeal the cabaret law, including Legalize Dancing NYC in the early 2000's and Metropolis in Motion later in that decade. Both of those organizations worked to raise public awareness around the issue through a variety of actions, and worked in parallel with legal efforts to repeal the Cabaret Law.
In 2017, Dance Liberation Network was formed, co-founded by Frankie Decaiza Hutchinson of Discwoman. They began the 'Let NYC Dance' movement to campaign for the repeal of the law.
In June, then-New York City Councilmember Rafael Espinal introduced a bill for the full repeal of the regulation. It was passed 44-1 by the City Council on October 31, 2017.
Notwithstanding the repeal of the licensing requirements of the Cabaret Law, under the City's Zoning Resolution, dancing is banned in the many areas of the City zoned residential or mixed-commercial-residential.
The City's Department of Buildings enforces the Zoning Resolution and the New York State Liquor Authority (SLA) will terminate the license of venues serving alcohol and allowing dancing if the Method of Operation in the issued Liquor Permit does not allow dancing. The SLA cooperates with community boards and will not issue licenses with dancing in areas where dancing is banned by the Zoning Resolution or if strongly opposed by the local board.
See also
- Dancing ban
- New York City Cabaret Card
- Nightlife legislation in New York City
- Stop-and-frisk in New York City
References
- "Text of 1926 Cabaret Law As enacted" (PDF). Zort Music. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
- Correal, Annie (30 October 2017). "After 91 Years, New York Will Let Its People Boogie". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 October 2017.
- "NYC Cabaret Law text" (PDF).
- Pickens, Ashley (2017-04-03). "Historically Racist NYC Law That Prevents Dancing In Bars Is Being Petitioned". Vibe. Retrieved 2017-04-15.
- krawitz, alan (2016-03-22). "Ninety years and counting for New York City's outdated cabaret law". Metro. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
- "TITLE 20: CONSUMER AFFAIRS:2017 Cabaret Law" (PDF).
- ^ Chevigny, Paul (2012-01-01). Gigs: jazz and the cabaret laws in New York City. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415648004. OCLC 809084872.
- Lerner, Michael A. (2008). "Chapter 6". Dry Manhattan Prohibition in New York City. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674030572.
- Proceedings of Bd. of Aldermen Mun. Assembly of City of New York, Recommendation No. 10, Dec. 7, 1926, at 572
- "Cabaret Law, Decades Old, Faces Repeal". The New York Times. 20 November 2003. Retrieved 29 September 2017.
- ^ "Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 132 Misc.2d 640 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1986)". Google Scholar.
- "NEW YORK VOICES: License To Dance | Thirteen / WNET New York". www.thirteen.org. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
- ^ "MUCHMORE'S CAFE, LLC V. CITY OF NEW YORK, Memorandum and Order, (EDNY 14-cv-05668, Doc. 27, September 29, 2016)" (PDF). GPO.
- "Warren Chiasson v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, 138 Misc.2d 394 (N.Y. County Sup. Ct., 1988)". Google Scholar.
- "John Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affair, 12 Misc. 3d 466 (Sup. Ct. NY County 2006)". Google Scholar.
- "Muchmore's Cafe, LLC v. City of New York, No. 1:14-cv-05668) United States District Court, Eastern District New York".
- "NYC lawyer and bar owner sues over cabaret licensing requirement". ABA Journal. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
- "Councilmember Rafael Espinal on why the Cabaret Law had to be repealed". Retrieved 2024-10-25.
- "How You Can Help End N.Y.C.'s Racist No-Dancing Law". The FADER. Retrieved 2020-06-10.
- "The New York City Council Int. No. 1652".
- "Action Details Int 1652-2017". Legistar. New York City Council. October 31, 2017.
- "New York City Zoning Resolution, Chapter 2 - Use Regulations - §32-15 Use Group 6".
- "Nighttime NYC: Law's Repeal Alone Won't End City's Dance Drought". 8 December 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- "Community Board Q & A".