| Revision as of 18:06, 30 November 2006 editKarrmann (talk | contribs)8,512 edits →Picture← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:24, 5 December 2024 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,967 editsm Signing comment by 217.146.120.2 - "" |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Maintained|{{User:RadioKirk/maintenance}}}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|class=FA|vital=yes|listas=Watson, Emma|1= |
|
<!--ADD YOUR NAME IF YOU CONTRIBUTE HEAVILY--!> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-priority=mid |old-peer-review=yes |filmbio-work-group=yes }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject England|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Low |harry-potter-task-force=yes |harry-potter-importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject France|importance=low|tf=Paris}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Disney|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|date=23 January 2008|user=Finetooth}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{British English}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|
|action1=WPR |
|
|
|action1date=03:13, 30 August 2007 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Emma Watson |
|
|
|action1oldid=154501250 |
|
|
|action2=PR |
|
|
|action2date=22:42, 10 September 2007 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Emma Watson/archive1 |
|
|
|action2result=reviewed |
|
|
|action2oldid=156789811 |
|
|
|action3=GAN |
|
|
|action3date=16:26, 23 September 2007 |
|
|
|action3link=Talk:Emma_Watson/Archive_4#GA_review |
|
|
|action3result=listed |
|
|
|action3oldid=159822101 |
|
|
|action4=FAC |
|
|
|action4date=17:40, 30 September 2007 |
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Emma Watson/archive1 |
|
|
|action4result=not promoted |
|
|
|action4oldid=161353600 |
|
|
|action5=FAC |
|
|
|action5date=18:19, 26 January 2008 |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Emma Watson |
|
|
|action5result=promoted |
|
|
|action5oldid=187062745 |
|
|
|topic = film |
|
|
|maindate=15 April 2009 |
|
|
|otd1date=2018-04-15|otd1oldid=836557186 |
|
|
|currentstatus=FA|otd2date=2023-04-15|otd2oldid=1149810979 |
|
|
|otd3date=2024-04-15|otd3oldid=1219013335 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
{{Press |
|
|
| subject = article |
|
|
| author = Stephen Harrison |
|
|
| title = Why China Blocked Misplaced Pages in All Languages |
|
|
| org = ] |
|
|
| url = https://slate.com/technology/2019/05/wikipedia-china-block-censorship-tiananmen-square.html |
|
|
| date = 21 May 2019 |
|
|
| accessdate = 23 May 2019 |
|
|
| quote = |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|Mar 19 2017 (21st)|Jan 2 2022 (16th)}}}} |
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Emma Watson|answered=yes}} |
|
<!--Template:Archivebox begins--> |
|
|
|
In the "External links" section, add the official fansite https://www.emmawatson.net ] (]) 21:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
{| class="infobox" width="315px" |
|
|
|
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> See ]. ] (]) 21:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|- |
|
|
! align="center" | ]<br />] |
|
|
---- |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
# ] |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<!--Template:Archivebox ends--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Model == |
|
==Not signing up for next two movies?== |
|
|
|
==friend== |
|
http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20060927harry-potter-casting |
|
|
|
milana amin her bestfriend who helped her get into acting from a young age went through devistation beacause of hoe mean emma was to milana <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
I wanted to add some of this information but the page is locked. Apparently she may not want to do the next two movies.] 04:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:If you read the , which has ben misquoted out of context across the Internet in the past few days, she never mentions sepcifically that she would not want to return to the Harry Potter movies. --] 10:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::That started off as rumor and then it just exploded into being news. But its totally over analyzing what she said in the interview --] 19:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, I've observed an ongoing debate among editors regarding the inclusion of the word "model" in the lead sentence and infobox when describing Watson. Some editors have been adding "model," while others have consistently reverted these edits, removing "model" from these specific sections. The editors advocating for the inclusion of "model" find themselves puzzled and seek an explanation for this discrepancy. |
|
==Birthplace== |
|
|
There is a video on EW.net where Emma says she was born in France. I can't listen to sound right now, and I don't speak French, so please let me know if this is true or not, and if it is please add it to Emma's page. ] 09:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Checkout the archives for this dicussion page. Its been dicussed and concluded that she was very likely not born in the UK, so therefore she was probably born in France. --] 20:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::To be fair, that's not something "concluded" within ] or outside ]. Please remember, everyone, this is an encyclopedia. :) <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 20:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, editors opposing the use of "model" argue that previous revisions should be consulted for the rationale, as they have already explained their stance in the past. --] (]) 11:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
==Picture== |
|
|
Why was the picture deleted? We need a replacement in order to make it a good article. ] 16:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Modeling isn't (per ROLEBIO) what made her notable, regardless of how many magazines mention her modeling. ] (]) 00:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
:Much to my continued disgust, ]. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 17:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:The main reason Watson is notable is for being an actress. Model and activist shouldn't be included per ] which states the first sentence of a biography should list {{tq|the main reason the person is notable}}. The first sentence should read {{tq|Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson (born 15 April 1990) is an English actress.}} ] (]) 00:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thank you for providing that link. I believe "activist" should stay, I have nothing to say further. ] (]) 00:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::She is known as an activist even less than she is a model, so no. ] (]) 00:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: What makes you say that? Can you provide any evidence that she is known as an activist even less than she is a model? ] (]) 16:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::The onus is on the person who would like to add content to show she is as well known as an activist as an actress. It is not up to others to prove a negative. ] (]) 16:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::@] A better question would be can you provide any evidence that being an activist is the main reason she's notable? ] (]) 16:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Activism may not be what brought her fame but it still is one of her professions. And I've seen many famous magazines like ], ] etc. address her as an actress and activist. So even if it can't be mentioned in the first line of the article, shouldn't it be mentioned in the introductory paragraph? Otherwise it may seem like her profession as an activist is being neglected. I know there is a part in the article dedicated to her activism but many others celebrities' like ] also have a section like that and even though Ariana is very outspoken about many topics, her main job isn't activism and she is not a professional activist. That's why I think "activism" should be mentioned at least in the introductory paragraph if not in the first sentence of the paragraph. ] (]) 10:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@] it's mentioned with due weight in the lead. The main first paragraph should be dedicated to why she is notable in the first place. ] (]) 12:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::I would say she is well known for her modelling. ] (]) 08:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Watson's relationships == |
|
In the template of this article, there should ONLY be a picture of ] in '']'' so leave it that way. --] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no reason for this article's Personal life section to include an enumeration of 10(!) past boyfriends. |
|
:Please see ]: we cannot use a character image to illustrate an actor and claim fair use. This was in effect before even the more stringent rewrite of policy. Sorry. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 05:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
In what way is that of "historical, societal, scientific, intellectualic significance"? I suggest deleting that part. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to know everyone's opinion on this matter: Should any of Watson's past relationships be mentioned in the personal life section of her Misplaced Pages article? Or should none of them be included, considering that ], and the mention of her marriage, if it were to happen, would be the only relevant information regarding her relationships in the personal life section? ] (]) 16:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
Whoever uploaded the image of Emma Watson that shows her underwear, is NOT allowed on Misplaced Pages and is NOT true |
|
|
|
:@], @], @] I would love to know your thoughts on this matter. Is that okay? I would like to reach a consensus on this matter if that's alright with you. ] (]) 02:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
about Emma Watson's history. --] |
|
|
|
::If you would like a consensus you can start by restoring the article back to the status quo until you have support. ] (]) 04:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Simply blanking reliably sourced material entirely is not acceptible. ] (]) 12:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::It is if the information is trivial, which it was. ] (]) 12:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::That's to be determined via discussion. Please restore the status quo. ] (]) 13:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I agree that a listing of past short-term romantic relationships is the purview of a gossip site and is not relevant for this article. ] ~ <small>]</small> 12:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
*This is rather simple... If something has received adaqeque coverage via ] it should be included with due weight. If it doesn't, just remove the parts that fail that standard. Removing an entire section because ] isn't sufficient. ] (]) 13:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
**We can't ] trivial information into an article just because it is mentioned around the internet. ] (]) 13:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
*Also see ]; essentially, we have a ] case here. Content was removed, content was restored....at that point discussion should have followed; just reverting back and forth is editwarring (all involved should consider this a warning). I would urge to restore at least the adequately sourced content, and discuss about its inclusion or exclusion afterwards....no touching the article, or we might have full protection and/or blocks for edit-warring. ] (]) 13:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::We create biographies on wikipedia, not a gossip column like you have in People magazine, Seasider and Bibliophile Dragon in my opinion have done the right thing in removing the relationship stuff. I only think it's worth mentioning, when one gets married or has children within a relationship. ] (]) 17:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I can't see any consensus agreed upon to remove the information from the page, so I am reverting it to how it was originally, with the information back in, and ensuring all sources are RS. Proper procedure, ie removing the information with consensus, was not followed here, so I'm restoring the information until consensus decides it should be removed, following discussion. IN any case, bio pages typically include relationship information, there is no wikipedia policy that says it needs to be removed. ] (]) 11:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Nationality == |
|
:I've made a request to Wikimedia Commons, where that particular image was uploaded. Meantime, I must ask again that you read the new ]; not only can we not use character images to illustrate actors and claim fair use, we can no longer use unfree images of anyone of whom a free image can be made—essentially, anyone still alive who remains in the public eye. This policy is too strict, in my opinion, but there it is. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 06:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article says that Watson is English. It should say that she is French-English or French-British, like that of ] which says she is Canadian-American (actually it says Canadian and American). ] (]) 02:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
::The deletion request page for that image is . –- <strong>]]</strong> ] 07:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:No, it shouldn't. ] (]) 10:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::That image is just a photoshop special, where that guy put emma's head on some random girl spreading her legs open. The original page is , and as you translate, it shows that it is his "dream" to see Emma in her underwear, so that proves that this image is fake and NOT approiate for wikipedia. This is the second time that people have done this. I remember that there was a porblem eearlier when someone placed a candid image of Emma where you could see the waist band of her underwear over teh top of her pants, and they had some caption like "Emma shows her white panties" or something. I kinda think that we must put strict guidelines on images placed in the article if them turns out to become a problem. BTW, with that fame image of Emma showing ehr underwear, was this ever placed into the article? ] 18:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::This has been discussed previously; one instance can be found here: ]. ] (]) 11:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Regardless, can you hyperlink Paris, France in the infobox? Several articles on celebrities have the name of the city they were born in hyperlinked, but this one doesn't? ] (]) 17:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Common terms should not be linked. ] (]) 18:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: Sorry I misspoke. I meant to say can you hyperlink Paris?] (]) 23:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::]. ] (]) 23:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::But ] Has the name of his birth city hyperlinked. So why shouldn't this one be hyperlinked? Would you care to explain? ] (]) 02:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Because Harlow is a lot less known than Paris is. ] (]) 06:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Emma Watson|answered=yes}} |
|
What kind of pictures can we use? That is, what would be considered free?<br>] 01:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] (]) 18:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Emma is Ishani not Taylor. |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 23:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The Article Picture == |
|
:Basically, any image to which the copyright owner (usually, whoever took the picture) gives up '''all''' rights for use and reproduction, anywhere. I have a request in to a professional photographer who has captured many of the ''Potter'' cast, but no reply yet. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> (]|]|])</small></tt> 01:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
talk for editing the picture ] (]) 11:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The Current picture is from 2013, and irrelevant , a newer picture would be better as from the ] ] (]) 11:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: '''Keep''' the picture from 2013. Courtesy link ]. For the moment, there is ] for the picture from 2013. Furthermore, the license for the picture you used isn't confirmed yet, so it shouldn't be used for the time being. ] (]) 11:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::The Picture is from the simple wiki page, under cc by 3.0 by an interview from the vogue magazine taiwan. ] (]) 11:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:*The file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the used license is valid. ] (]) 12:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::The original talk was from 2021, Emma Watson's appearance is now drastically different from the 2013 picture, as she has grown older. ] (]) 11:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::*Yes, but it was reinforced by a more recent discussion in 2023. ] (]) 12:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::According to me, it would be best to update to a more recent picture, until there is any opposition to the edit. ] (]) 12:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*Well, I oppose your edit, for the time being. ] (]) 12:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*:Not to be rude, but you seem as the only source for consensus in the 2022-2023 discussion, even then there were multiple people vouching for a newer picture. ] (]) 09:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Emma Watson|answered=yes}} |
|
|
emma Watson is not rhea. ] (]) 03:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 04:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
milana amin her bestfriend who helped her get into acting from a young age went through devistation beacause of hoe mean emma was to milana — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.146.120.2 (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Recently, I've observed an ongoing debate among editors regarding the inclusion of the word "model" in the lead sentence and infobox when describing Watson. Some editors have been adding "model," while others have consistently reverted these edits, removing "model" from these specific sections. The editors advocating for the inclusion of "model" find themselves puzzled and seek an explanation for this discrepancy.
On the other hand, editors opposing the use of "model" argue that previous revisions should be consulted for the rationale, as they have already explained their stance in the past. --Bibliophile Dragon (talk) 11:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no reason for this article's Personal life section to include an enumeration of 10(!) past boyfriends.
In what way is that of "historical, societal, scientific, intellectualic significance"? I suggest deleting that part.
I would like to know everyone's opinion on this matter: Should any of Watson's past relationships be mentioned in the personal life section of her Misplaced Pages article? Or should none of them be included, considering that Misplaced Pages is not a gossip site, and the mention of her marriage, if it were to happen, would be the only relevant information regarding her relationships in the personal life section? Bibliophile Dragon (talk) 16:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The article says that Watson is English. It should say that she is French-English or French-British, like that of Tara Strong which says she is Canadian-American (actually it says Canadian and American). 174.94.54.119 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: See WP:NOBLOGS. Tollens (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 23:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)