Revision as of 03:28, 8 October 2019 editSefarat90 (talk | contribs)276 edits →Identity← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:35, 28 May 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to Talk:Egyptians/Archive 1) (botTag: Replaced |
(43 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}} |
|
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Egypt|class=B|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Egypt|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|class=B|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|class=B|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Arab world|class=B|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Arab world|importance=Top}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Old AfD multi| date = 8 January 2007 |
|
{{Old AfD multi| date = 8 January 2007 |
Line 13: |
Line 12: |
|
| page2 = Egyptians |
|
| page2 = Egyptians |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
{{archives|auto=long|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=365|index=/Archive index}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
⚫ |
| algo = old(30d) |
⚫ |
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
⚫ |
| archive = Talk:Egyptians/Archive %(counter)d |
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 4 |
|
| counter = 1 |
|
⚫ |
| maxarchivesize = 200K |
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
⚫ |
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
⚫ |
|algo = old(100d) |
|
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:Egyptians/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
⚫ |
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{archives}} |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|
<!-- TALK PAGE CONTENT BELOW THIS LINE ---> |
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Identity == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|Treannmust}} you keep deleting my edits labeling them as plagiarism when they aren't. I don't understand why you do that. I added sources citing how Egyptians Identified themselves in the 18th and 19th century, if you have other sources from that era then add them, I won't remove them. In fact it would be great to have more references. Also, you keep labeling what I wrote as plagiarism. What plagiarism exactly? I wrote every word of that except the citations. The article now presents all views on Identity in a more balanced fashion chronologically, without stressing on one point of view. If you want to add something, do it, but don't remove my entire effort, reading, getting sources, and writing, in one click just because you don't like my opinion, or because history starts in the early 20th century. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Please try to limit the personal opinions of Non-Egyptians on how the Egyptian Identity should be, listing a singular opinion, such as that of H. S. Deighton is misleading. H. S. Deighton is a British historian and an orientalist who is very little known in Egypt. This section should represent how Egyptians identified during different periods, not how others thought they should identify. {{unsigned|Sefarat90}} |
|
|
:Sir, you kept adding different words to quotes! literally adding words to what the writer narrated making it appear like his own words. Also i answered you before, you can't attack historians nationalities. Non-Egyptians? you literally quoted racist Turkish Pashas who viewed us Egyptians as inferiror and the same page where you kept insisting to add from is literally saying so. Thanks ] (]) 22:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sir, you keep accusing me of unfounded claims. I didn’t add any words to anything. Secondly, please don’t attack me personally, I have nothing against you. Third, no, it’s not racist to say that we want to have the opinions of Egyptians mainly. When talking about identity, it is common sense to list how a specific people view themselves. What is actually racist is to list the opinion of a Person from a country that was occupying Egypt, litterally telling people how they should identify. By the way, I am also Egyptian, and I bave issues with many views that about identity, but I don’t try to suppress them because I believe they are part of the collective conscience of Egyptians, and all opinions have to be represented in a balanced way. Lastly, I am not listing random pashas’ opinions, I am listing how official documents in their country referred to them, how the first leader of their military viewed them, and how they themselves referred to themselves. Thanks! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:::Totally false, you narrated a QUOTE, and totally changed it's meaning! You claimed that the word Egyptians / Masryeen from Misr (Egypt) originally refers Cairo, which is a totally historically false claim. The name Misr is given to the entire country of Egypt under after the Arab rule and is mentioned in the ] and is based on ] too. The writer says that Native Muslims in Cairo commonly refer to themselves as Egyptians / El Masryeen, and the capital city of Egypt as Masr. That's in the same way how in French litretaure people used to refer to Paris as France. You totally twisted the meaning and cliamed that Masr was originally a name given to Cairo, which is FALSE. You put on the English Misplaced Pages FALSE TRANSLATIONS using the fact that not many people can understand Arabic, you translated the term "Misr / Masr" into Cairo, where in fact ] is literally Al Qahera in Arabic while Misr/ Masr is literal word for EGYPT. You can't twist someone's words and also you can't put false translations ] (]) 23:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I didn’t, Misr used to refer to the greater Cairo area, even before Cairo was built, it was also used to refer to Al fustat, and also to the entire land of Egypt, just like Sham is used to refer to Damascus, and to the entire levant, and just like Tunis used to the city of Tunis, and to the entire country of Tunisia. If you actually read the citations you will see that. You not wanting to read references and not wanting to know how an expression could mean different things in different times, and wanting to impose the modern day definitions on the past is not my problem.{{unsigned|Sefarat90}} |
|
|
:::::You totally ignored the warning of the respectful Misplaced Pages Admin on both our pages, that you can't revert edits, yet you still reverted edits two more times. You judge writers and historians based on their nationalities, this is unacceptable. And regarding the occupier and their listed terms, the page literally says that Turks view Egyptians as too inferior, the page didn't say that EGYPTIANS called themselves SONS OF ARABS!. There's a HUGE difference between the term "Arab" which is a term used to identify Arabic speaking people from Morocco to Oman, and between a nation calling themselves "Sons of Arabs", Egyptians called themselves "Sons of Egypt", you passed a Turkish opinion viewing people they harassed under a section where it should list how Egyptians identify. ] (]) 23:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::::: In your search history, yet another Misplaced Pages Admin ] is warning you from personal attacks, you are attacking people based on their nationalities, this nationality can write.. this can not write. Here's the warning incase you didn't read it ] (]) 23:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::: Where did it say sons of Egypt exactly? I provided a reference of an Egyptian referring to himself as an Arab. Where is your reference?? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
::::::: Do you know what the modern term Arab mean? this isn't even the reference i am refering to and you know that well. Sons of Egypt (Awlad Masr) is the term Egyptians in the capital refered to themselves along with term 'Ahl El Balad' (The country's natives), to distinguish themselves from Turkish elites and the quote belongs to Edward William Lane. 'Sons of Arabs' (A-V-lad l Arab (Obvious foreign Turkish pronunciation) ) is a term Egyptians never ever used discribing themselves, and the writer's quote is STATING that it belongs to Ottoman rulers NOT an Egyptian term/slogan at all, and that's the thing we are discussing here!. ] (]) 00:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Also you kept ignoring Misplaced Pages Adminstration warnings. This is against Misplaced Pages Rules and could get you blocked. ] (]) |
|
|
:::::::: The book says people of Cairo call themselves Awlad Masr (people if cairo) not of Egypt, and as opposed to Fellahin (People from the countryside), not to Turks.{{unsigned|Sefarat90}} |
|
|
::::::::: The book literally says the MULSIM NATIVES IN CAIRO call themselves The Egyptians (El Masryeen) and Sons of EGYPT (Misr). You are the one who keeps changing the quote. And nice that you refered to the Fellahin (Farmers), where all census from that period state that they were the majority of the nation and that Egypt had an incredibly high illiteracy rate. Imagine forcing a term they never ever used on them and putitng a Turkish narrative, Egyptians NEVER called themselves 'Avlad lArab'. And this colonist narrative totally wipes off millions of the Fellahin. Unlike your edits, i take quotes very seriously and i don't change their meanings, you just contradicted yourselve by mentioning the Fellahin whom are very very very related to their land and never ever called themselves 'Avlad lArab'. Thank you for proving my point. ] (]) 01:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::::::::Ok. You keep accusing me of false claims. I am going to quote what the book says verbatim. First, I am using the book "The Manners & Customs of the Modern Egyptians By Edward William Lane, London & Tornto, Published by J M Dent & Sons Limited. And In New York, By E.P. Dutton and Co". In Chapter 1, page 26 in the book he says: <quote>"In every point of view, Masr (or Cairo) must be regarded as the first Arab city of our age"</quote>, so it states clearly what Masr means in the book. Additionally, in the next page (page 27) he says verbatim: <quote> "The native Muslim inhabitants of Cairo commonly call themselves " El-Masreeyeen," "Owlad-Maasr " (or " Ahl Masr "), and "Owlad-el-Beled, which signify People of Masr, Children of. Masr, and Children of the Town : the singular forms of these appellations are "Maasree,'' "Ibn-Masr," and "Ibn-el-Beled." Of these three terms, the last is most common in the town itself. The country people are called "El-Fellaheen" (or the agriculturists), in the singular" Fellah." </quote>. I don't think I am the one who is trying to twist the meaning the writer is trying to convey. Please read the book before getting angry at me. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Rameses DNA Dispute Resolution Filed == |
|
|
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#DNA_history_of_Egypt |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 6 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720131306/http://www.emigration.gov.eg/allnews/DisplayNews.aspx?CatId=16&NewsId=88758 to http://www.emigration.gov.eg/allnews/DisplayNews.aspx?CatId=16&NewsId=88758 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060804010403/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/758/feature.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/758/feature.htm |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011173545/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/839/eg1.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/839/eg1.htm |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/baltimore_county/bal-md.co.egyptians13aug13,0,4970784.story?coll=bal-local-headlines |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/Parliament/3251/spring99/saudi.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002202141/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2006/807/op6.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2006/807/op6.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 09:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== June 2018 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Per the recent editwarring, I went to the source https://www.nature.com/articles/srep09996 , which clearly has the Copts as a distinct group. Should the editwarring continue, I will call for the article to be locked down.--] (]) 05:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC) |
|