Misplaced Pages

User talk:PKtm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:48, 4 December 2006 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Mediation request: - Page is unprotected← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:46, 8 January 2017 edit undoJohn from Idegon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers107,583 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Lisa Alther. (TW
(33 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="infobox" width="315px"
|-
! align="center" | ]<br />]
----
|-
|
# ]
# ]
# <!--]-->
#
#
|}<!--Template:Archivebox-->


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
== LostNav ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Hey, could you take a minute and weigh your opinion ]? I don't think that this guy is fully understanding my point of view, and having someone else in on the discussion might help. Thanks. ] (<sup>]</sup> | <small>]</small> | <sub><span class="plainlinks"></span></sub>) 14:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 04:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
== You're kidding... ==

You must be kidding with . She's accused me and others of sockpuppetry, stalking, admin status abuse, personal attacks, harrassment, poll tampering, and incivility (I probably left out a few) and called almost everyone on that page a "madhouse" - all while returning only long enough to post one inflammatory comment per day and ignore everyone's responses. All of this after moving pages and intentionally blocking move reverting with minor edits... but me calling all of that disruptive is the problem you hone in on? —] (]) 21:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:My point was that the discourse has gotten ugly, and your responses seem to have, well, gotten personal, on this bizarrely minor issue that no one should care ''that'' much about. So do the poll. Let's get this behind us. -- ] 21:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure I was the one just called a sockpuppet so I'm not sure how ''I've'' gotten personal but, if you think that, fine. She's turned into "threatening on multiple occasions to use his admin tools to force through his opinion." My edit was in reference to the multiple occasions on both sides of people doing moves and then minor edits so the moves can't be reverted. Sorry but when software abuse is done that blatantly, any admin is within their rights to unblock that move - and that goes for both sides of the fence because {{user|Ned Scott}} did the same thing in the other direction. (I give him kudos for at least admitting to the illicit action).

::As far as a new poll, if you want a new poll, say so. If it seems like there's consensus to do a new poll, we'll do a new poll. But we shouldn't do one just because one person wants one and, under the guise of incivility and unreported personal attacks, chooses to ignore the seven or eight other people who disagree. —] (]) 22:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

== My Comments ==

I believe my responses were reasonable given what I was responding to. Sorry you didn't like them. I've moved on. --] 13:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

== Mediation request ==

{{RFM-Request|Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (television)|Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)}} —] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

:PKtm, hiya, the Mediation page is unprotected now, if you'd like to agree to mediation. If you'd rather not be involved though, I think it's okay if you simply remove your name from the list. Up to you. :) ]. --] 20:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:46, 8 January 2017

Nomination of Lisa Alther for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Alther is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lisa Alther until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)