Misplaced Pages

Hedylidae: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:34, 22 October 2019 editDyanega (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,066 editsm Undid revision 922427862 by Uhkneesuuh (talk); again, this reference is already included and citedTag: Undo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:38, 8 December 2024 edit undoFlora and fauna man (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,841 editsm Typos correctedTag: Visual edit 
(35 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Family of moth-like butterflies}}
{{Taxobox
{{Automatic taxobox
| name = Hedylidae
| image = Macrosoma bahiata.jpg | image = Macrosoma bahiata.jpg
| image_caption = ''Macrosoma bahiata'' | image_caption = '']''
| parent_authority = Guenée, 1857, nec. Bergh, 1895
| regnum = ]ia
| taxon = Macrosoma
| phylum = ]a
| authority = ], 1818
| classis = ]a
| display_parents = 3
| ordo = ]
| zoodivisio = ] | type_species = '']''
| type_species_authority = ], 1818
| unranked_superfamilia = ]
| superfamilia = '''Hedyloidea'''
| superfamilia_authority = Scoble, 1986
| familia = '''Hedylidae'''
| familia_authority = Guenée, 1857, nec. Bergh, 1895
| genus = '''''Macrosoma'''''
| genus_authority = ], 1818
| type_species = ''Macrosoma tipulata'' ], 1818
| diversity = 35 currently recognised species | diversity = 35 currently recognised species
| subdivision_ranks = Species
| diversity_link = Lepidopteran diversity
| subdivision = see ]
| subdivision_ranks = ] and ]
| subdivision = | synonyms =
'''''Macrosoma''''' <small>Hübner, 1818</small><br /> * ''Epirrita'' <small>Hübner, 1808</small>
*=''Epirrita'' <small>Hübner, 1808</small> * ''Hedyle'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Hedyle heliconiaria'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>
*=''Hedyle'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Hedyle heliconiaria'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small> * ''Phellinodes'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Phellinodes satellitiata'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>
*=''Phellinodes'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Phellinodes satellitiata'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small> * ''Venodes'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Phellinodes satellitiata'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>
*=''Venodes'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small>, type species ''Phellinodes satellitiata'' <small>Guenée, 1857</small> * ''Macrophila'' <small>Walker, 1862</small>, type species ''Macrosoma tipulata'' <small>Hübner, 1818</small>
*=''Macrophila'' <small>Walker, 1862</small>, type species ''Macrosoma tipulata'' <small>Hübner, 1818</small> * ''Hyphedyle'' <small>Warren, 1894</small>, type species ''Hedyle rubedinaria'' <small>Walker, 1862</small>
*=''Hyphedyle'' <small>Warren, 1894</small>, type species ''Hedyle rubedinaria'' <small>Walker, 1862</small> * ''Lasiopates'' <small>Warren, 1905</small>, type species ''Lasiopates hyacinthina'' <small>Warren, 1905</small>
*=''Lasiopates'' <small>Warren, 1905</small>, type species ''Lasiopates hyacinthina'' <small>Warren, 1905</small>
&nbsp; for '''Species''', see ]
}} }}

'''Hedylidae''', the "American moth-butterflies", is a ] of ] in the order ], representing the ] '''Hedyloidea'''. They have traditionally been viewed as an ] ] of the butterfly superfamily ]. In 1986, Scoble combined all species into a single genus '''''Macrosoma''''', comprising 35 currently recognized and entirely ] species, as a novel concept of ].<ref name ="Scoble86">{{cite journal |author=Scoble MJ |year=1986 |title=The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies |journal=Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. |volume=53 |pages=251–286}}</ref>
'''Hedylidae''', the "American moth-butterflies", is a ] of insects in the order ], representing the superfamily '''Hedyloidea'''. They have traditionally been viewed as an ] ] of the butterfly superfamily ], but a 2014 ] analysis has suggested Hedylidae is a subgroup of ], and not a sister group, and are more accurately referred to as butterflies rather than moths.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kawahara |first1=Akito Y. |last2=Breinholt |first2=Jesse W. |date=2014-08-07 |title=Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |language=en |volume=281 |issue=1788 |pages=20140970 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2014.0970 |issn=0962-8452 |pmc=4083801 |pmid=24966318}}</ref> They are represented by a single ] genus, '''''Macrosoma''''', with 35 currently recognized species.


==Taxonomy and systematics== ==Taxonomy and systematics==
'''Hedylidae''' were previously treated as a ] of ]: Oenochrominae, the "Hedylicae".<ref name ="Scoble86"/><ref>{{cite journal |author=Prout LB |year=1910 |title=Lepidoptera Heterocera, Fam. Geometridae, Subfam. Oenochrominae |journal=Genera Insectorum |volume=104 |pages=1–119}}</ref> Prout<ref>{{cite journal |author=Prout LB |year=1931 |title=The American Geometridae |journal=The Macrolepidoptera of the World |volume=8 |pages=1–144}}</ref> considered they might even merit treatment as their own family. Scoble first considered them to be a hitherto unrecognised group of butterflies and also suggested Hedylidae might possibly constitute the ] of the "true" butterflies (]), rather than of (] + Papilionoidea). Weintraub and Miller<ref>{{cite journal |author=Weintraub JD, Miller JS |year=1987 |title=The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of butterflies |journal=Cladistics |volume=3|issue=3|doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00512.x |pages=299–304}}</ref> argued against this placement (but see<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Scoble |first1=Malcolm J. |title=Hedylidae: a response to Weintraub and Miller |journal=Cladistics |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=93–6 |year=1988 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00470.x}}</ref>). In 1995, Weller and Pashley<ref>{{cite journal |author=Weller SJ, Pashley DP |title=In search of butterfly origins |journal=Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=235–46 |date=September 1995 |pmid=8845961 |doi=10.1006/mpev.1995.1022}}</ref> found that ] data did indeed place Hedylidae with the butterflies and a more comprehensive study in 2005<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AV, etal |title=Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B |volume=272 |issue=1572 |pages=1577–86 |date=August 2005 |pmid=16048773 |pmc=1560179 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2005.3124}}</ref> based on 57 exemplar ], three ] and 99 ] characters, recovered the genus ''Macrosoma'' as sister to the ("Papilionoidea" + Hesperioidea). However, the most recent ] analyses shows that skippers are true butterflies and therefore within the clade Papilionoidea, whereas the hedylids are a sister group that may be closely related to the obtectomeran moths.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1186/s12862-015-0520-0|pmid=26589618|pmc=4654798|title=Elusive ditrysian phylogeny: An account of combining systematized morphology with molecular data (Lepidoptera)|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|volume=15|pages=260|year=2015|last1=Heikkilä|first1=Maria|last2=Mutanen|first2=Marko|last3=Wahlberg|first3=Niklas|last4=Sihvonen|first4=Pasi|last5=Kaila|first5=Lauri}}</ref> This is contrary to some earlier studies that had shown both the skippers and hedylids as being nested within the Papilionoidea.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1098/rspb.2011.1430 |pmid=21920981 |title=Cretaceous origin and repeated tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=279 |issue=1731 |pages=1093–1099 |year=2011 |last1=Heikkila |first1=M. |last2=Kaila |first2=L. |last3=Mutanen |first3=M. |last4=Pena |first4=C. |last5=Wahlberg |first5=N. |pmc=3267136 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1098/rspb.2014.0970 |pmid=24966318 |title=Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=281 |issue=1788 |pages=20140970 |year=2014 |last1=Kawahara |first1=A. Y. |last2=Breinholt |first2=J. W. |pmc=4083801 }}</ref> '''Hedylidae''' were previously treated as a ] of ]: Oenochrominae, the "Hedylicae".<ref name ="Scoble86"/><ref>{{cite journal |author=Prout LB |year=1910 |title=Lepidoptera Heterocera, Fam. Geometridae, Subfam. Oenochrominae |journal=Genera Insectorum |volume=104 |pages=1–119}}</ref> Prout<ref>{{cite journal |author=Prout LB |year=1931 |title=The American Geometridae |journal=The Macrolepidoptera of the World |volume=8 |pages=1–144}}</ref> considered they might even merit treatment as their own family. Scoble first considered them to be a hitherto unrecognised group of butterflies and also suggested Hedylidae might possibly constitute the ] of the "true" butterflies (]), rather than of (] + Papilionoidea). Weintraub and Miller<ref>{{cite journal |author=Weintraub JD, Miller JS |year=1987 |title=The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of butterflies |journal=Cladistics |volume=3|issue=3|doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00512.x |pages=299–304|s2cid=221574665 }}</ref> argued against this placement (but see<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Scoble |first1=Malcolm J. |title=Hedylidae: a response to Weintraub and Miller |journal=Cladistics |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=93–6 |year=1988 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00470.x|pmid=34933497 |s2cid=85579049 |doi-access=free }}</ref>). In 1995, Weller and Pashley<ref>{{cite journal |author=Weller SJ, Pashley DP |title=In search of butterfly origins |journal=Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=235–46 |date=September 1995 |pmid=8845961 |doi=10.1006/mpev.1995.1022|bibcode=1995MolPE...4..235W }}</ref> found that molecular data did indeed place Hedylidae with the butterflies and a more comprehensive study in 2005<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AV, etal |title=Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B |volume=272 |issue=1572 |pages=1577–86 |date=August 2005 |pmid=16048773 |pmc=1560179 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2005.3124}}</ref> based on 57 exemplar ], three ] and 99 ] characters, recovered the genus ''Macrosoma'' as sister to the ("Papilionoidea" + Hesperioidea). However, the most recent ] analyses shows that skippers are true butterflies and therefore within the clade Papilionoidea, whereas the hedylids are a sister group that may be closely related to the obtectomeran moths.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1186/s12862-015-0520-0|pmid=26589618|pmc=4654798|title=Elusive ditrysian phylogeny: An account of combining systematized morphology with molecular data (Lepidoptera)|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|volume=15|pages=260|year=2015|last1=Heikkilä|first1=Maria|last2=Mutanen|first2=Marko|last3=Wahlberg|first3=Niklas|last4=Sihvonen|first4=Pasi|last5=Kaila|first5=Lauri |issue=1 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2015BMCEE..15..260H }}</ref> This is contrary to some earlier studies that had shown both the skippers and hedylids as being nested within the Papilionoidea.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1098/rspb.2011.1430 |pmid=21920981 |title=Cretaceous origin and repeated tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=279 |issue=1731 |pages=1093–1099 |year=2011 |last1=Heikkila |first1=M. |last2=Kaila |first2=L. |last3=Mutanen |first3=M. |last4=Pena |first4=C. |last5=Wahlberg |first5=N. |pmc=3267136 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1098/rspb.2014.0970 |pmid=24966318 |title=Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=281 |issue=1788 |pages=20140970 |year=2014 |last1=Kawahara |first1=A. Y. |last2=Breinholt |first2=J. W. |pmc=4083801 }}</ref>


Since there are no obvious gaps between supposed species groups, according to basic morphological structure, Scoble (1986) synonymised the five pre-existing genera of Hedylidae (33 of which had been ] in ''Phellinodes'') into just one genus. However, a phylogenetic analysis of all ''Macrosoma'' species is still needed. Since there are no obvious gaps between supposed species groups, according to basic morphological structure, Scoble (1986) synonymised the five pre-existing genera of Hedylidae (33 of which had been ] in ''Phellinodes'') into the single genus ''Macrosoma''.<ref name="Scoble86">{{cite journal |author=Scoble MJ |year=1986 |title=The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies |journal=Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. |volume=53 |pages=251–286}}</ref> However, a phylogenetic analysis of all ''Macrosoma'' species is still needed.


===Nomenclatural notes=== ===Nomenclatural notes===
In ], numerous junior ] of ''Macrosoma'' (Hübner, 1818) exist,<ref></ref> (''Macrosoma'' Leach 1819 (a ]), ''Macrosoma'' de Haan 1826 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 (''Macrosoma multisulcata'' Berlese 1913 and ''M. floralis'', Diptera: ]), ''Macrosoma'' Brandt 1835 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Hope 1837 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Lioy 1864 or 1865 (Diptera: ]), Macrosoma Hammer 1979<ref>Hammer, M. (1979). Investigations on the oribatid fauna of Java. ''K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skr.'', '''22'''(9): 34.</ref> (''M.rugosa''; ]: Oribatidae). To add to this potential confusion in lists of names, there exist two junior homonyms of ''Hedyle'' Guenée, 1857: ''Hedyle'' Bergh, 1895 (]s in the ] Opisthobranchia: ] "Acochlidioidea", ] Hedylopsidae Odhner, 1952<ref>http://names.ubio.org/browser/details.php?search_all=&search_some=&names=on&authors=on&sci=on&vern=on&conceptID=&expand=&namebankID=505084&classID=82&lineage=230572|230454|425100|425106|425093</ref> that are currently placed in the genus ''Hedylopsis'' Thiele, 1931),<ref>http://www.seaslug.com/PDF%20Files/Millard.html</ref> and ''Hedyle'' Malmgren 1865 (a ] worm).<ref>http://uio.mbl.edu/NZ/detail.php?uid=87027&d=1</ref> The sea slug family name "Hedylidae Bergh, 1895" (type species ''Hedyle weberi'' Bergh, 1895) is thus also invalid. In ], numerous junior ] of ''Macrosoma'' (Hübner, 1818) exist,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://names.ubio.org/browser/details.php?names=on&authors=on&sci=on&vern=on&namebankID=2996951 |title=Synonymy |access-date=2007-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720184322/http://names.ubio.org/browser/details.php?names=on&authors=on&sci=on&vern=on&namebankID=2996951 |archive-date=2011-07-20 |url-status=dead }}</ref> (''Macrosoma'' Leach 1819 (a ]), ''Macrosoma'' de Haan 1826 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 (Diptera: ]), ''Macrosoma'' Brandt 1835 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Hope 1837 (]), ''Macrosoma'' Lioy 1864 or 1865 (Diptera: ]), ''Macrosoma'' Hammer 1979<ref>Hammer, M. (1979). Investigations on the oribatid fauna of Java. ''K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skr.'', '''22'''(9): 34.</ref> (]: Oribatidae). To add to this potential confusion in lists of names, there exist two junior homonyms of ''Hedyle'' Guenée, 1857: ''Hedyle'' Bergh, 1895 (], "Acochlidioidea", ];<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://names.ubio.org/browser/details.php?search_all=&search_some=&names=on&authors=on&sci=on&vern=on&conceptID=&expand=&namebankID=505084&classID=82&lineage=230572%7C230454%7C425100%7C425106%7C425093 |title=Archived copy |access-date=2020-01-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303193850/http://names.ubio.org/browser/details.php?search_all=&search_some=&names=on&authors=on&sci=on&vern=on&conceptID=&expand=&namebankID=505084&classID=82&lineage=230572%7C230454%7C425100%7C425106%7C425093 |archive-date=2016-03-03 |url-status=dead }}</ref> currently placed in the genus '']'' Thiele, 1931),<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.seaslug.com/PDF%20Files/Millard.html |title=Subclass: Opisthobranchia |access-date=2007-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070331211008/http://www.seaslug.com/PDF%20Files/Millard.html |archive-date=2007-03-31 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and ''Hedyle'' Malmgren 1865 (a ] worm).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://uio.mbl.edu/NZ/detail.php?uid=87027&d=1 |title=Nomenclator Zoologicus Record Detail |access-date=2007-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071007115525/http://uio.mbl.edu/NZ/detail.php?uid=87027&d=1 |archive-date=2007-10-07 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The sea slug family name "Hedylidae Bergh, 1895" (type species ''Hedyle weberi'' Bergh, 1895) is thus also invalid.


==Morphology and identification== ==Morphology and identification==
The eggs of hedylid moths have an upright configuration and are variable in shape: in ''Macrosoma inermis'' they are particularly narrow and spindle-shaped,<ref name="Scoble90a">Scoble, M.J. (1990a). A catalogue of the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea), with descriptions of two new species. ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''21''': 113-119.</ref> resembling those of some ], and in the case of ''M. tipulata'' they are more barrel-shaped,<ref name="Lourido07">Lourido, G., Silva, N.M., Motta, C.S. 2007. Biological Parameters and Damage by ''Macrosoma tipulata'' Hübner (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae), in Cupuaçu tree in Amazonas, Brazil. ''Neotropical Entomology'', '''36'''(1):102-106.</ref> like certain ]. The ]e resemble (probably ]) those of ].<ref name="Scoble90a"/> Adult hedylids resemble ] moths. They share many morphological and ] characteristics with both the ] ] and the ]. The ] is very long and slim, like many ] butterflies of the ] ] and ], hence the name of one ''Macrosoma'' species "''heliconiaria''". Unlike other butterflies, however, the ] are un-], but rather ] or ].<ref name="Scoble95"/> Unlike the ] ], in which they had been placed by the ] expert L.B.Prout, hedylids lack ] at the base of the abdomen, but have them on the wings (see under ]). Unlike other butterflies, however (except the unique case of the remarkable Australian skipper butterfly '']'', whose males possess these structures), the single-spined ] and ] are not lost or reduced in males, except in three ''Macrosoma'' species where there is no functional wing coupling system. The retinaculum is always lost in females, and the frenulum may be ].<ref name ="Scoble86"/> The family have been fully catalogued<ref name="Scoble90a"/> and illustrated in an identification guide.<ref name="Scoble90b">Scoble, M.J. (1990b). An identification guide to the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea). ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''21''': 121-158.</ref> The eggs of hedylid moths have an upright configuration and are variable in shape: in ''Macrosoma inermis'' they are particularly narrow and spindle-shaped,<ref name="Scoble90a">Scoble, M.J. (1990a). A catalogue of the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea), with descriptions of two new species. ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''21''': 113-119.</ref> resembling those of some ], and in the case of ''M. tipulata'' they are more barrel-shaped,<ref name="Lourido07">{{cite journal|author=Lourido, G.|author2= Silva, N.M.|author3= Motta, C.S. |year=2007|title=Biological Parameters and Damage by ''Macrosoma tipulata'' Hübner (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae), in Cupuaçu tree in Amazonas, Brazil|journal=Neotropical Entomology|volume=36|issue=1|pages=102–106|doi= 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100012|pmid= 17420867|doi-access=free}}</ref> like certain ]. The ]e resemble (probably ]) those of ].<ref name="Scoble90a"/> Adult hedylids resemble ] moths. They share many morphological and ] characteristics with both the ] ] and the ]. The ] is very long and slim, like many ] butterflies of the subfamilies ] and ], hence the name of one ''Macrosoma'' species "''heliconiaria''". Unlike other butterflies, however, the ] are un-], but rather ] or ].<ref name="Scoble95"/> Unlike the ] ], in which they had been placed by the ] expert L.B.Prout, hedylids lack ] at the base of the abdomen, but have them on the wings (see under ]). Unlike other butterflies, however (except the unique case of the remarkable Australian skipper butterfly '']'', whose males possess these structures), the single-spined ] and ] are not lost or reduced in males, except in three ''Macrosoma'' species where there is no functional wing coupling system. The retinaculum is always lost in females, and the frenulum may be ].<ref name ="Scoble86"/> The family have been fully catalogued<ref name="Scoble90a"/> and illustrated in an identification guide.<ref name="Scoble90b">Scoble, M.J. (1990b). An identification guide to the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea). ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''21''': 121-158.</ref>


===Butterfly-like characteristics of Hedylidae=== ===Butterfly-like characteristics of Hedylidae===
#"]" with "secondary line of weakness" near median "notal" wing process,<ref>Minet, J. (1991). Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera: #"]" with "secondary line of weakness" near median "notal" wing process,<ref>Minet, J. (1991). Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera:
Glossata). ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''22''': 69-95.</ref> as in some representatives of Papilionidea and Hesperioidea (potentially unique butterfly character;<ref name="deJong96">de Jong, R., Vane_Wright, R.I. and Ackery, P.R. 1996. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''27''': 65-102.</ref> Glossata). ''Entomologica Scandinavica'', '''22''': 69-95.</ref> as in some representatives of Papilionidea and Hesperioidea (potentially unique butterfly character;<ref name="deJong96">{{cite journal|author=de Jong, R. |author2= Vane_Wright, R.I. |author3=Ackery, P.R. |year=1996|title=The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects|journal=Entomologica Scandinavica|volume=27|pages=65–102|doi= 10.1163/187631296X00205 }}</ref>
#] ] with horizontal chamber, as in other butterflies (not Papilionidae), but as also in ];<ref name="Scoble95">Scoble, M.J. (1995). ''The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity''. The Natural History Museum and Oxford University Press, London.</ref><ref name="deJong96"/> #] ] with horizontal chamber, as in other butterflies (not Papilionidae), but as also in ];<ref name="Scoble95">{{cite book|author=Scoble, M.J. |year=1995|title=The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity|publisher=The Natural History Museum and Oxford University Press|location=London}}</ref><ref name="deJong96"/>
#] "furca" resembling a blunt arrowhead;<ref name="Scoble86"/> this a variable but potentially unique character in butterflies;<ref name="deJong96"/> #] "furca" resembling a blunt arrowhead;<ref name="Scoble86"/> this a variable but potentially unique character in butterflies;<ref name="deJong96"/>
#Second ''median plate'' of ] base lying partly under the base of ] "1A+2A", unlike the configuration in moths;<ref name="Scoble86"/> #Second ''median plate'' of ] base lying partly under the base of ] "1A+2A", unlike the configuration in moths;<ref name="Scoble86"/>
Line 55: Line 47:
#Abdominal first ] segment is strongly "pouched" (Scoble 1986; as also in ] moths;<ref name="deJong96"/> #Abdominal first ] segment is strongly "pouched" (Scoble 1986; as also in ] moths;<ref name="deJong96"/>
#] ] joining "marginopleural" sulcus;<ref name="Scoble86"/> #] ] joining "marginopleural" sulcus;<ref name="Scoble86"/>
#Male ] ] lost, thus fused into two elements<ref name="Ackery99">Ackery, P.R., de Jong, R and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1999). The Butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidae. Pp. 263-300 in Kristensen, N.P. (Ed.). ''Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies''. Volume 1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography. Volume IV/Part 35: 491 pp. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.</ref> as in ] butterflies, with the mid and hindlegs used for perching, but apparently redeveloped in hesperiids;<ref name="Scoble86"/> #Male ] lost, thus fused into two elements<ref name="Ackery99">{{cite book|author=Ackery, P.R.|author2= de Jong, R |author3= Vane-Wright, R.I. |year=1999|chapter=The Butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidae|pages=263–300|editor=Kristensen, N.P.|title=Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies|volume=1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography. Volume IV/Part 35: 491 pp|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|location=Berlin, New York}}</ref> as in ] butterflies, with the mid and hindlegs used for perching, but apparently redeveloped in hesperiids;<ref name="Scoble86"/>
#Egg upright, spindle-shaped and ribbed<ref name="ScobleAiello90">Scoble, M.J., Aiello, A. (1990). Moth-like butterflies (Hedylidae: Lepidoptera): a summary, with comments on the egg. ''Journal of Natural History'', '''24'''(1): 159-164.</ref> as in some Pieridae (e.g. the ] butterfly), some other butterflies, and as in some moth groups also;<ref name="deJong96"/> #Egg upright, spindle-shaped and ribbed<ref name="ScobleAiello90">{{cite journal|author=Scoble, M.J.|author2= Aiello, A. |year=1990|title=Moth-like butterflies (Hedylidae: Lepidoptera): a summary, with comments on the egg|journal=Journal of Natural History|volume=24|issue=1|page=159-164|doi= 10.1080/00222939000770101 }}</ref> as in some Pieridae (e.g. the ] butterfly), some other butterflies, and as in some moth groups also;<ref name="deJong96"/>
#] with "anal comb",<ref name="Scoble92">Scoble, M.J., 1992. Guía de las Mariposas Hedílidas de Costa Rica (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae). In: ''Guía de Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad'', '''1''': v, 30 pp, + 61 figs.</ref> as in some Hesperioidea (not however ]) and Pieridae, but not in other Papilionoidea except one species (and also independently in ]), that is used for propulsion of ] away from the caterpillar;<ref name="deJong96"/> #] with "anal comb",<ref name="Scoble92">{{cite book|author=Scoble, M.J.|year= 1992|chapter=Guía de las Mariposas Hedílidas de Costa Rica (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae)|title=Guía de Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad}}</ref> as in some Hesperioidea (not however ]) and Pieridae, but not in other Papilionoidea except one species (and also independently in ]), that is used for propulsion of ] away from the caterpillar;<ref name="deJong96"/>
#Caterpillar with horn-like processes and a "bifid" tail as in many Nymphalidae;<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/><ref></ref> #Caterpillar with horn-like processes and a "bifid" tail as in many Nymphalidae;<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/03-SRNP-5947_DHJ400748.jpg |title=Image of bifid tail |access-date=2007-04-07 |archive-date=2007-04-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070411220411/http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/03-SRNP-5947_DHJ400748.jpg |url-status=dead }}</ref>
#Caterpillar with "secondary ]", as in Pieridae;<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/> #Caterpillar with "secondary ]", as in Pieridae;<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/>
#] ]l ] "crochet" hooks not forming a complete circle, unlike configuration in hesperiids and papilionoids;<ref name="Scoble86"/> #] ]l ] "crochet" hooks not forming a complete circle, unlike configuration in hesperiids and papilionoids;<ref name="Scoble86"/>
#] affixed to the substrate via a ] around the 1st abdominal segment,<ref></ref><ref></ref> like in Pieridae (as also in some ], especially the ] Sterrhinae (in which the girdle is around the abdomen), but lost in many ]);<ref name="Scoble86"/> #] affixed to the substrate via a ] around the 1st abdominal segment,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/04-SRNP-40726_DHJ83185_f.jpg|title=Image of 1st abdominal segment}}{{Dead link|date=July 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%2079-SRNP-362c/79-SRNP-362c_DHJ56694_f.jpg |title=Image of 1st abdominal segment}}{{Dead link|date=July 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> like in Pieridae (as also in some ], especially the subfamily ] (in which the girdle is around the abdomen), but lost in many ]);<ref name="Scoble86"/>
#]l ] lost, as in papilionoids, and a few other groups of Lepidoptera;<ref name="Scoble86"/> #]l ] lost, as in papilionoids, and a few other groups of Lepidoptera;<ref name="Scoble86"/>
#"Temporal cleavage line" lost in the pupa (as in papilionoids).<ref name="Scoble86"/> #"Temporal cleavage line" lost in the pupa (as in papilionoids).<ref name="Scoble86"/>


==Distribution== ==Distribution==
Hedylidae range in ] south from central ] and in ] through the ] from southern ] (where there are a full 26 species,<ref>Lamas, G. and Grados, J. (1998). ''Sinopsis de los Hedylidae (Lepidoptera) del Perú.'' ''Revista Peruviana Entomologia'', '''40''': 107-109.</ref> up to 12 at a single site:<ref name="Grados98">Grados, J. (1998). Pp 119-120 in Alonso, A. and F. Dallmeier (eds). ''Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: Cashiriari-3 Well Site and the Camisea and Urubamba Rivers''. SI/MAB Series #2. Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.</ref> to central ] and southwestern ]<ref name="Scoble90b"/>). In the ], they also occur in ], ], and ].<ref name="Scoble90b"/><ref name="Grados98"/> Hedylidae range in ] south from central ] and in ] through the ] from southern ] (where there are a full 26 species,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Lamas, G. |author2=Grados, J. |year=1998|title=Sinopsis de los Hedylidae (Lepidoptera) del Perú|journal=Revista Peruviana Entomologia|volume=40|pages=107–109}}</ref> up to 12 at a single site:<ref name="Grados98">{{cite book|author=Grados, J. |year=1998|pages=119–120|editor=Alonso, A.|editor2=F. Dallmeier|title=Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: Cashiriari-3 Well Site and the Camisea and Urubamba Rivers|series=SI/MAB Series #2|publisher=Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program|location=Washington, DC}}</ref> to central ] and southwestern ]<ref name="Scoble90b"/>). In the ], they also occur in ], ], and ].<ref name="Scoble90b"/><ref name="Grados98"/>


==Behaviour== ==Behaviour==
Hedylids are ], but occasionally some species can be found flying by day.<ref name ="Kendall76">Kendall, R.O., (1976). Larval foodplants and life history notes for eight moths from Texas and Mexico. ''Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society'', '''30'''(4): 264-271.</ref> Thus, they may be involved in some ] complexes with ] (e.g. the female only of ''Macrosoma lucivittata'').<ref>Beccaloni, G.W. (1997). Ecology, natural history and behaviour of ithomiine butterflies and their mimics in Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). ''Tropical Lepidoptera'', '''8'''(2): 103-124.</ref> A few species are white<ref></ref> and resemble pierid butterflies (e.g. ''Macrosoma napiaria''). Based on a study of ''Macrosoma heliconiaria'', it has been found that hedylids have ]s on their ] for hearing<ref></ref> apparently ] to the "Vogel's organ" in some ]<ref>Rydell, J., Kaerma, S., Hedelin, H. and Skals, N. (2004). Evasive response to ultrasound by the crepuscular butterfly ''Manataria maculata''. ''Naturwissenschaften'', '''90'''(2): 80-83.</ref> that would help them evade bats at night. They have been shown to exhibit typical moth evasive behaviour towards bats such as erratic spiralling movements and dives.<ref>Yack, J.E. and Fullard, J.H. (1999). Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies. ''Nature'', '''403''': 265-266.</ref> The resting posture is often at a curious angle,<ref>http://www.naruto-u.ac.jp/~koshio/macrosoma.gif</ref> with the thorax tilted and the posterior edge of the hindwings nearly touching the substrate (Scoble, 1986). The larvae which lack the prominent horns in the first ] tend to rest on the ] of the leaf and often skeletonise leaves or at either side produce an untidy patchwork of holes.<ref>http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/04-SRNP-56084_DHJ402166.jpg</ref> The elegant pupa is attached by a ] and silken girdle<ref>http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20tipulata/05-SRNP-31301_DHJ404036.jpg</ref> and sometimes resembles a bird dropping.<ref>http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20conifera/00-SRNP-15830_DHJ55789_f.jpg</ref> Hedylids are ], but occasionally some species can be found flying by day.<ref name ="Kendall76">{{cite journal|author=Kendall, R.O. |year=1976|title=Larval foodplants and life history notes for eight moths from Texas and Mexico|journal=Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society|volume=30|issue=4|pages=264–271|url=https://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/1970s/1976/1976-30(4)264-Kendall.pdf}}</ref> Thus, they may be involved in some ] complexes with ] (e.g. the female only of ''Macrosoma lucivittata'').<ref>{{cite journal|author=Beccaloni, G.W. |year=1997|title=Ecology, natural history and behaviour of ithomiine butterflies and their mimics in Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) |journal=Tropical Lepidoptera|volume=8|issue=2|pages=103–124}}</ref> A few species are white<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/nicaraguamoths/images2/macind1.htm|title=Moths of Nicaragua Macrosoma sp. indet. 1 family Hedylidae|website=www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk}}</ref> and resemble pierid butterflies (e.g. ''Macrosoma napiaria''). Based on a study of ''Macrosoma heliconiaria'', it has been found that hedylids have ]s on their ] for hearing<ref></ref> apparently ] to the "Vogel's organ" in some ]<ref>{{cite journal|author=Rydell, J.|author2= Kaerma, S.|author3= Hedelin, H. |author4= Skals, N. |year=2004|title=Evasive response to ultrasound by the crepuscular butterfly ''Manataria maculata''|journal=Naturwissenschaften |volume=90|issue=2|pages=80–83|doi= 10.1007/s00114-002-0391-2|pmid= 12590303}}</ref> that would help them evade bats at night. They have been shown to exhibit typical moth evasive behaviour towards bats such as erratic spiralling movements and dives.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Yack, J.E. |author2=Fullard, J.H. |year=1999|title=Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies |journal=Nature|volume=403|issue=6767 |pages=265–266|doi=10.1038/35002247 |pmid=10659835 }}</ref> The resting posture is often at a curious angle,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.naruto-u.ac.jp/~koshio/macrosoma.gif |title=Image |access-date=2007-04-07 |archive-date=2007-09-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928045509/http://www.naruto-u.ac.jp/~koshio/macrosoma.gif |url-status=dead }}</ref> with the thorax tilted and the posterior edge of the hindwings nearly touching the substrate (Scoble, 1986). The larvae which lack the prominent horns in the first ] tend to rest on the ] of the leaf and often skeletonise leaves or at either side produce an untidy patchwork of holes.<ref>{{cite web|title=Image|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/04-SRNP-56084_DHJ402166.jpg|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070411220325/http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20cascaria/04-SRNP-56084_DHJ402166.jpg |archive-date=2007-04-11}}</ref> The elegant pupa is attached by a ] and silken girdle<ref>{{cite web|title=Image|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20tipulata/05-SRNP-31301_DHJ404036.jpg}}</ref> and sometimes resembles a bird dropping.<ref>{{cite web|title=Image|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20conifera/00-SRNP-15830_DHJ55789_f.jpg |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070411220241/http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20conifera/00-SRNP-15830_DHJ55789_f.jpg |archive-date=2007-04-11}}</ref>


==List of species== ==List of species==
Line 112: Line 104:


==Biology and host plants== ==Biology and host plants==
The life history of ''Macrosoma heliconiaria'' was originally described from plants of ''Byttneria aculeata'' in ].<ref name ="Kendall76"/> This was a historical breakthrough into the biology of hedylids. In this study, Kendall commented notably "I thought the larvae might represent a satyr species, but when the first larva pupated I was sure it was a pierid. The first adult emerged as a complete surprise. The pupa...is secured by girdle and cremaster, not unlike a pierid". ''Macrosoma cascaria'' was later also reared on this plant in ].<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/> More life histories are now known. From these data, known host plants span a wide range of (according to the ]) ] ] plants, including the ] ] ] ] ] (] '']'', '']'', and '']''), the ] ] ], ] ] ('']''), and ] ('']''), the ] ] ], ] ] ('']'') and more commonly<ref>Janz, N. and Nylin, S. (1998). Butterflies and Plants: A Phylogenetic Study. ''Evolution'', '''52'''(2): 486-502.</ref> ], ] ], ]: ] ('']''), ] ('']'' and also '']'',<ref name="Scoble90b"/> ] (''Byttneria aculeata'', '']'') and ] ('']''). The "green lizard caterpillar" ''Macrosoma tipulata''<ref></ref> attacks an economically important local fruit tree "Cupuaçu" ('']'') in ] and can defoliate saplings; the biology of this species has been studied and illustrated in some detail.<ref name="Lourido07"/> The larva of this species lives about 15 days in 5 instars, the pupal stage lasts about 7 days and the adult lives about 10 days. ''M. tipulata'' and many other species can be found as adults through most of the year.<ref name="Scoble90b"/> The life history of ''Macrosoma heliconiaria'' was originally described from plants of ''Byttneria aculeata'' in ].<ref name ="Kendall76"/> This was a historical breakthrough into the biology of hedylids. In this study, Kendall commented notably "I thought the larvae might represent a satyr species, but when the first larva pupated I was sure it was a pierid. The first adult emerged as a complete surprise. The pupa...is secured by girdle and cremaster, not unlike a pierid". ''Macrosoma cascaria'' was later also reared on this plant in ].<ref name="ScobleAiello90"/> More life histories are now known. From these data, known host plants span a wide range of (according to the ]) ] ] plants, including the ] ] ] ] ] (] '']'', '']'', and '']''), the ] ] ], ] ] ('']''), and ] ('']''), the ] ] ], ] ] ('']'') and more commonly<ref>{{cite journal|author=Janz, N. |author2=Nylin, S. |year=1998|title=Butterflies and Plants: A Phylogenetic Study|journal=Evolution|volume=52|issue=2|pages=486–502|doi=10.2307/2411084 |jstor=2411084 |pmid=28568350 }}</ref> ], ] ], ]: ] ('']''), ] ('']'' and also '']'',<ref name="Scoble90b"/> ] (''Byttneria aculeata'', '']'') and ] ('']''). The "green lizard caterpillar" ''Macrosoma tipulata''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://janzen-db.bio.upenn.edu:16080/2700ARCHIVES/Hedylidae/Macrosoma%20tipulata/05-SRNP-21251_DHJ403525.jpg |title=Image of ''Macrosoma tipulata''}}{{Dead link|date=July 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> attacks an economically important local fruit tree "Cupuaçu" ('']'') in ] and can defoliate saplings; the biology of this species has been studied and illustrated in some detail.<ref name="Lourido07"/> The larva of this species lives about 15 days in 5 instars, the pupal stage lasts about 7 days and the adult lives about 10 days. ''M. tipulata'' and many other species can be found as adults through most of the year.<ref name="Scoble90b"/>


==DNA sequences== ==DNA sequences==
A few species have been ] for the ] genes "cytochrome oxidase I", and "ND1" and ]s "Wingless" and "Ef-1?",<ref></ref> including ''Macrosoma semiermis''. Some species are currently being ].<ref></ref> A few species have been ] for the ] genes "cytochrome oxidase I", and "ND1" and ]s "Wingless" and "Ef-1",<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/nucleotide?cmd=search|title=Nucleotide - NCBI|website=www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov}}</ref> including ''Macrosoma semiermis''. Some species are currently being ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.barcodinglife.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxon=Macrosoma |title=DNA Barcodes for ''Macrosoma''}}</ref>


==Cited literature== ==Cited literature==
Line 121: Line 113:


==Sources== ==Sources==
*Scoble, M.J. (1986). The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies. ''Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series'', '''53''': 251-286. *{{cite journal|author=Scoble, M.J. |year=1986|title=The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies|journal=Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series |volume=53|pages=251–286}}


==External links== ==External links==
Line 129: Line 121:
* *
* *
*
* *
* *
Line 135: Line 126:
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *{{Dead link|date=January 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
* *{{Dead link|date=January 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
* *


{{Lepidoptera}} {{Lepidoptera}}
Line 148: Line 139:
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 03:38, 8 December 2024

Family of moth-like butterflies

Hedylidae
Macrosoma bahiata
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Clade: Obtectomera
Superfamily: Papilionoidea
Family: Hedylidae
Guenée, 1857, nec. Bergh, 1895
Genus: Macrosoma
Hübner, 1818
Type species
Macrosoma tipulata
Hübner, 1818
Species

see List of species

Diversity
35 currently recognised species
Synonyms
  • Epirrita Hübner, 1808
  • Hedyle Guenée, 1857, type species Hedyle heliconiaria Guenée, 1857
  • Phellinodes Guenée, 1857, type species Phellinodes satellitiata Guenée, 1857
  • Venodes Guenée, 1857, type species Phellinodes satellitiata Guenée, 1857
  • Macrophila Walker, 1862, type species Macrosoma tipulata Hübner, 1818
  • Hyphedyle Warren, 1894, type species Hedyle rubedinaria Walker, 1862
  • Lasiopates Warren, 1905, type species Lasiopates hyacinthina Warren, 1905

Hedylidae, the "American moth-butterflies", is a family of insects in the order Lepidoptera, representing the superfamily Hedyloidea. They have traditionally been viewed as an extant sister group of the butterfly superfamily Papilionoidea, but a 2014 phylogenetic analysis has suggested Hedylidae is a subgroup of Papilionoidea, and not a sister group, and are more accurately referred to as butterflies rather than moths. They are represented by a single Neotropical genus, Macrosoma, with 35 currently recognized species.

Taxonomy and systematics

Hedylidae were previously treated as a tribe of Geometridae: Oenochrominae, the "Hedylicae". Prout considered they might even merit treatment as their own family. Scoble first considered them to be a hitherto unrecognised group of butterflies and also suggested Hedylidae might possibly constitute the sister group of the "true" butterflies (Papilionoidea), rather than of (Hesperioidea + Papilionoidea). Weintraub and Miller argued against this placement (but see). In 1995, Weller and Pashley found that molecular data did indeed place Hedylidae with the butterflies and a more comprehensive study in 2005 based on 57 exemplar taxa, three genes and 99 morphological characters, recovered the genus Macrosoma as sister to the ("Papilionoidea" + Hesperioidea). However, the most recent phylogenetic analyses shows that skippers are true butterflies and therefore within the clade Papilionoidea, whereas the hedylids are a sister group that may be closely related to the obtectomeran moths. This is contrary to some earlier studies that had shown both the skippers and hedylids as being nested within the Papilionoidea.

Since there are no obvious gaps between supposed species groups, according to basic morphological structure, Scoble (1986) synonymised the five pre-existing genera of Hedylidae (33 of which had been described in Phellinodes) into the single genus Macrosoma. However, a phylogenetic analysis of all Macrosoma species is still needed.

Nomenclatural notes

In zoological nomenclature, numerous junior homonyms of Macrosoma (Hübner, 1818) exist, (Macrosoma Leach 1819 (a reptile), Macrosoma de Haan 1826 (Odonata), Macrosoma Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 (Diptera: Muscidae), Macrosoma Brandt 1835 (Coelenterata), Macrosoma Hope 1837 (Coleoptera), Macrosoma Lioy 1864 or 1865 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), Macrosoma Hammer 1979 (Acarina: Oribatidae). To add to this potential confusion in lists of names, there exist two junior homonyms of Hedyle Guenée, 1857: Hedyle Bergh, 1895 (Opisthobranchia, "Acochlidioidea", Hedylopsidae; currently placed in the genus Hedylopsis Thiele, 1931), and Hedyle Malmgren 1865 (a polychaete worm). The sea slug family name "Hedylidae Bergh, 1895" (type species Hedyle weberi Bergh, 1895) is thus also invalid.

Morphology and identification

The eggs of hedylid moths have an upright configuration and are variable in shape: in Macrosoma inermis they are particularly narrow and spindle-shaped, resembling those of some Pieridae, and in the case of M. tipulata they are more barrel-shaped, like certain Nymphalidae. The larvae resemble (probably convergently) those of Apaturinae. Adult hedylids resemble geometer moths. They share many morphological and genetic characteristics with both the superfamilies Papilionoidea and the Hesperioidea. The abdomen is very long and slim, like many Neotropical butterflies of the subfamilies Ithomiinae and Heliconiinae, hence the name of one Macrosoma species "heliconiaria". Unlike other butterflies, however, the antennae are un-clubbed, but rather filiform or bipectinate. Unlike the family Geometridae, in which they had been placed by the geometer expert L.B.Prout, hedylids lack tympanic organs at the base of the abdomen, but have them on the wings (see under Behaviour). Unlike other butterflies, however (except the unique case of the remarkable Australian skipper butterfly Euschemon rafflesia, whose males possess these structures), the single-spined frenulum and retinaculum are not lost or reduced in males, except in three Macrosoma species where there is no functional wing coupling system. The retinaculum is always lost in females, and the frenulum may be vestigial. The family have been fully catalogued and illustrated in an identification guide.

Butterfly-like characteristics of Hedylidae

  1. "Mesoscutum" with "secondary line of weakness" near median "notal" wing process, as in some representatives of Papilionidea and Hesperioidea (potentially unique butterfly character;
  2. Mesothoracic aorta with horizontal chamber, as in other butterflies (not Papilionidae), but as also in Cossidae;
  3. Metathoracic "furca" resembling a blunt arrowhead; this a variable but potentially unique character in butterflies;
  4. Second median plate of forewing base lying partly under the base of vein "1A+2A", unlike the configuration in moths;
  5. "Postspiracular bar" on first abdominal segment;
  6. Female genitalic "anterior apophyses" reduced;
  7. Male genitalia relatively "deep" dorso-ventrally;
  8. Abdomen curved (especially in males), as in papilionoids;
  9. Abdominal first tergal segment is strongly "pouched" (Scoble 1986; as also in Thyatirinae moths;
  10. "Precoxal" sulcus joining "marginopleural" sulcus;
  11. Male Foreleg pretarsus lost, thus fused into two elements as in nymphalid butterflies, with the mid and hindlegs used for perching, but apparently redeveloped in hesperiids;
  12. Egg upright, spindle-shaped and ribbed as in some Pieridae (e.g. the orange tip butterfly), some other butterflies, and as in some moth groups also;
  13. Larva with "anal comb", as in some Hesperioidea (not however Megathyminae) and Pieridae, but not in other Papilionoidea except one species (and also independently in Tortricidae), that is used for propulsion of frass away from the caterpillar;
  14. Caterpillar with horn-like processes and a "bifid" tail as in many Nymphalidae;
  15. Caterpillar with "secondary setae", as in Pieridae;
  16. Ventral larval proleg "crochet" hooks not forming a complete circle, unlike configuration in hesperiids and papilionoids;
  17. Pupa affixed to the substrate via a silken girdle around the 1st abdominal segment, like in Pieridae (as also in some Geometridae, especially the subfamily Sterrhinae (in which the girdle is around the abdomen), but lost in many Papilionoidea);
  18. Pupal cocoon lost, as in papilionoids, and a few other groups of Lepidoptera;
  19. "Temporal cleavage line" lost in the pupa (as in papilionoids).

Distribution

Hedylidae range in North America south from central Mexico and in South America through the Amazon from southern Peru (where there are a full 26 species, up to 12 at a single site: to central Bolivia and southwestern Brazil). In the Caribbean, they also occur in Cuba, Jamaica, and Trinidad.

Behaviour

Hedylids are attracted to artificial lights, but occasionally some species can be found flying by day. Thus, they may be involved in some mimicry complexes with Ithomiinae (e.g. the female only of Macrosoma lucivittata). A few species are white and resemble pierid butterflies (e.g. Macrosoma napiaria). Based on a study of Macrosoma heliconiaria, it has been found that hedylids have tympanic organs on their forewings for hearing apparently homologous to the "Vogel's organ" in some Papilionoidea that would help them evade bats at night. They have been shown to exhibit typical moth evasive behaviour towards bats such as erratic spiralling movements and dives. The resting posture is often at a curious angle, with the thorax tilted and the posterior edge of the hindwings nearly touching the substrate (Scoble, 1986). The larvae which lack the prominent horns in the first instar tend to rest on the midrib of the leaf and often skeletonise leaves or at either side produce an untidy patchwork of holes. The elegant pupa is attached by a cremaster and silken girdle and sometimes resembles a bird dropping.

List of species

This list of species is largely based on phenetic characters.

Biology and host plants

The life history of Macrosoma heliconiaria was originally described from plants of Byttneria aculeata in Mexico. This was a historical breakthrough into the biology of hedylids. In this study, Kendall commented notably "I thought the larvae might represent a satyr species, but when the first larva pupated I was sure it was a pierid. The first adult emerged as a complete surprise. The pupa...is secured by girdle and cremaster, not unlike a pierid". Macrosoma cascaria was later also reared on this plant in Panama. More life histories are now known. From these data, known host plants span a wide range of (according to the APG II system) rosid dicotyledonous plants, including the rosid order Myrtales family Melastomataceae (genera Miconia, Conostegia, and Ossaea), the eurosid I order Malpighiales, families Euphorbiaceae (Croton), and Malpighiaceae (Byrsonima), the eurosid II orders Sapindales, family Rutaceae (Zanthoxylum) and more commonly Malvales, family Malvaceae, tribes: Bombacoideae (Ochroma), Malvoideae (Hampea and also Hibiscus, Byttnerioideae (Byttneria aculeata, Theobroma) and Grewioideae (Luehea). The "green lizard caterpillar" Macrosoma tipulata attacks an economically important local fruit tree "Cupuaçu" (Theobroma grandiflorum) in Brazil and can defoliate saplings; the biology of this species has been studied and illustrated in some detail. The larva of this species lives about 15 days in 5 instars, the pupal stage lasts about 7 days and the adult lives about 10 days. M. tipulata and many other species can be found as adults through most of the year.

DNA sequences

A few species have been sequenced for the mitochondrial genes "cytochrome oxidase I", and "ND1" and nuclear genes "Wingless" and "Ef-1", including Macrosoma semiermis. Some species are currently being barcoded.

Cited literature

  1. Kawahara, Akito Y.; Breinholt, Jesse W. (2014-08-07). "Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1788): 20140970. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0970. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 4083801. PMID 24966318.
  2. ^ Scoble MJ (1986). "The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies". Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 53: 251–286.
  3. Prout LB (1910). "Lepidoptera Heterocera, Fam. Geometridae, Subfam. Oenochrominae". Genera Insectorum. 104: 1–119.
  4. Prout LB (1931). "The American Geometridae". The Macrolepidoptera of the World. 8: 1–144.
  5. Weintraub JD, Miller JS (1987). "The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of butterflies". Cladistics. 3 (3): 299–304. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00512.x. S2CID 221574665.
  6. Scoble, Malcolm J. (1988). "Hedylidae: a response to Weintraub and Miller". Cladistics. 4 (1): 93–6. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00470.x. PMID 34933497. S2CID 85579049.
  7. Weller SJ, Pashley DP (September 1995). "In search of butterfly origins". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 4 (3): 235–46. Bibcode:1995MolPE...4..235W. doi:10.1006/mpev.1995.1022. PMID 8845961.
  8. Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AV, et al. (August 2005). "Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 272 (1572): 1577–86. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3124. PMC 1560179. PMID 16048773.
  9. Heikkilä, Maria; Mutanen, Marko; Wahlberg, Niklas; Sihvonen, Pasi; Kaila, Lauri (2015). "Elusive ditrysian phylogeny: An account of combining systematized morphology with molecular data (Lepidoptera)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 15 (1): 260. Bibcode:2015BMCEE..15..260H. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0520-0. PMC 4654798. PMID 26589618.
  10. Heikkila, M.; Kaila, L.; Mutanen, M.; Pena, C.; Wahlberg, N. (2011). "Cretaceous origin and repeated tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1731): 1093–1099. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1430. PMC 3267136. PMID 21920981.
  11. Kawahara, A. Y.; Breinholt, J. W. (2014). "Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1788): 20140970. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0970. PMC 4083801. PMID 24966318.
  12. "Synonymy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
  13. Hammer, M. (1979). Investigations on the oribatid fauna of Java. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skr., 22(9): 34.
  14. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2020-01-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  15. "Subclass: Opisthobranchia". Archived from the original on 2007-03-31. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
  16. "Nomenclator Zoologicus Record Detail". Archived from the original on 2007-10-07. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
  17. ^ Scoble, M.J. (1990a). A catalogue of the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea), with descriptions of two new species. Entomologica Scandinavica, 21: 113-119.
  18. ^ Lourido, G.; Silva, N.M.; Motta, C.S. (2007). "Biological Parameters and Damage by Macrosoma tipulata Hübner (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae), in Cupuaçu tree [Theobroma grandiflorum (Wild ex Spreng Schum)] in Amazonas, Brazil". Neotropical Entomology. 36 (1): 102–106. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100012. PMID 17420867.
  19. ^ Scoble, M.J. (1995). The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity. London: The Natural History Museum and Oxford University Press.
  20. ^ Scoble, M.J. (1990b). An identification guide to the Hedylidae (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea). Entomologica Scandinavica, 21: 121-158.
  21. Minet, J. (1991). Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Glossata). Entomologica Scandinavica, 22: 69-95.
  22. ^ de Jong, R.; Vane_Wright, R.I.; Ackery, P.R. (1996). "The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects". Entomologica Scandinavica. 27: 65–102. doi:10.1163/187631296X00205.
  23. Ackery, P.R.; de Jong, R; Vane-Wright, R.I. (1999). "The Butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidae". In Kristensen, N.P. (ed.). Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies. Vol. 1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography. Volume IV/Part 35: 491 pp. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 263–300.
  24. ^ Scoble, M.J.; Aiello, A. (1990). "Moth-like butterflies (Hedylidae: Lepidoptera): a summary, with comments on the egg". Journal of Natural History. 24 (1): 159-164. doi:10.1080/00222939000770101.
  25. Scoble, M.J. (1992). "Guía de las Mariposas Hedílidas de Costa Rica (Lepidoptera: Hedylidae)". Guía de Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad.
  26. "Image of bifid tail". Archived from the original on 2007-04-11. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  27. "Image of 1st abdominal segment".
  28. "Image of 1st abdominal segment".
  29. Lamas, G.; Grados, J. (1998). "Sinopsis de los Hedylidae (Lepidoptera) del Perú". Revista Peruviana Entomologia. 40: 107–109.
  30. ^ Grados, J. (1998). Alonso, A.; F. Dallmeier (eds.). Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: Cashiriari-3 Well Site and the Camisea and Urubamba Rivers. SI/MAB Series #2. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program. pp. 119–120.
  31. ^ Kendall, R.O. (1976). "Larval foodplants and life history notes for eight moths from Texas and Mexico" (PDF). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society. 30 (4): 264–271.
  32. Beccaloni, G.W. (1997). "Ecology, natural history and behaviour of ithomiine butterflies and their mimics in Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae)". Tropical Lepidoptera. 8 (2): 103–124.
  33. "Moths of Nicaragua Macrosoma sp. indet. 1 family Hedylidae". www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk.
  34. Organ of hearing
  35. Rydell, J.; Kaerma, S.; Hedelin, H.; Skals, N. (2004). "Evasive response to ultrasound by the crepuscular butterfly Manataria maculata". Naturwissenschaften. 90 (2): 80–83. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0391-2. PMID 12590303.
  36. Yack, J.E.; Fullard, J.H. (1999). "Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies". Nature. 403 (6767): 265–266. doi:10.1038/35002247. PMID 10659835.
  37. "Image". Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  38. "Image". Archived from the original on 2007-04-11.
  39. "Image".
  40. "Image". Archived from the original on 2007-04-11.
  41. Janz, N.; Nylin, S. (1998). "Butterflies and Plants: A Phylogenetic Study". Evolution. 52 (2): 486–502. doi:10.2307/2411084. JSTOR 2411084. PMID 28568350.
  42. "Image of Macrosoma tipulata".
  43. "Nucleotide - NCBI". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  44. "DNA Barcodes for Macrosoma".

Sources

  • Scoble, M.J. (1986). "The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of the butterflies". Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series. 53: 251–286.

External links

Extant Lepidoptera families
Suborder Zeugloptera
MicropterigoideaMicropterigidae (mandibulate archaic moths)
Suborder Aglossata
AgathiphagoideaAgathiphagidae (kauri moths)
Suborder Heterobathmiina
HeterobathmioideaHeterobathmiidae
Suborder Glossata
Dacnonypha
Eriocranioidea
Acanthoctesia
Acanthopteroctetoidea
Lophocoronina
LophocoronoideaLophocoronidae
Neopseustina
Neopseustoidea
Exoporia
Hepialoidea
Mnesarchaeoidea
H
e
t
e
r
o
n
e
u
r
a
M
o
n
o
t
r
y
s
i
a
Adeloidea
Adelidae (fairy longhorn moths)
Cecidosidae
Heliozelidae
Incurvariidae
Prodoxidae (yucca moths)
Andesianoidea
Nepticuloidea
Nepticulidae (pigmy, or midget moths)
Opostegidae (white eyecap moths)
Palaephatoidea
Palaephatidae (Gondwanaland moths)
Tischerioidea
Tischeriidae (trumpet leaf miner moths)
D
i
t
r
y
s
i
a
Simaethistoidea
Simaethistidae
Tineoidea
Acrolophidae (burrowing webworm moths)
Arrhenophanidae
Eriocottidae (Old World spiny-winged moths)
Psychidae (bagworm moths)
Tineidae (fungus moths)
Gracillarioidea
Bucculatricidae (ribbed cocoon makers)
Douglasiidae (Douglas moths)
Gracillariidae
Roeslerstammiidae
Yponomeutoidea
Acrolepiidae (false diamondback moths)
Bedelliidae
Glyphipterigidae (sedge moths)
Heliodinidae
Lyonetiidae
Plutellidae
Yponomeutidae (ermine moths)
Ypsolophidae
Gelechioidea
Autostichidae
Batrachedridae
Blastobasidae
Coleophoridae (case-bearers, case moths)
Cosmopterigidae (cosmet moths)
Elachistidae (grass-miner moths)
Gelechiidae (twirler moths)
Lecithoceridae (long-horned moths)
Lypusidae
Metachandidae
Momphidae (mompha moths)
Oecophoridae (concealer moths)
Pterolonchidae
Scythrididae (flower moths)
Xyloryctidae (timber moths)
Galacticoidea
Galacticidae
Zygaenoidea
Heterogynidae
Zygaenidae (burnet, forester, or smoky moths)
Himantopteridae
Lacturidae
Somabrachyidae
Megalopygidae (flannel moths)
Aididae
Anomoeotidae
Cyclotornidae
Epipyropidae (planthopper parasite moths)
Dalceridae (slug caterpillars)
Limacodidae (slug, or cup moths)
Cossoidea
Cossidae (carpenter millers, or goat moths)
Dudgeoneidae (dudgeon carpenter moths)
Sesioidea
Brachodidae (little bear moths)
Castniidae (castniid moths: giant butterfly-moths, sun moths)
Sesiidae (clearwing moths)
Choreutoidea
Choreutidae (metalmark moths)
Tortricoidea
Tortricidae (tortrix moths)
Urodoidea
Urodidae (false burnet moths)
Schreckensteinioidea
Schreckensteiniidae (bristle-legged moths)
Epermenioidea
Epermeniidae (fringe-tufted moths)
Alucitoidea
Alucitidae (many-plumed moths)
Tineodidae (false plume moths)
Pterophoroidea
Pterophoridae (plume moths)
Whalleyanoidea
Whalleyanidae
Immoidea
Immidae
Copromorphoidea
Copromorphidae (tropical fruitworm moths)
Carposinidae (fruitworm moths)
Thyridoidea
Thyrididae (picture-winged leaf moths)
Calliduloidea
Callidulidae (Old World butterfly-moths)
Papilionoidea
(butterflies)
Papilionidae (swallowtail butterflies)
Hedylidae (American moth-butterflies)
Hesperiidae (skippers)
Pieridae (whites, yellows, orangetips, sulphurs)
Riodinidae (metalmarks)
Lycaenidae (gossamer-winged butterflies: blues, coppers and relatives)
Nymphalidae (brush-footed, or four-footed butterflies)
Hyblaeoidea
Hyblaeidae (teak moths)
Pyraloidea
Pyralidae (snout moths)
Crambidae (grass moth)
Mimallonoidea
Mimallonidae (sack bearer moths)
Lasiocampoidea
Lasiocampidae (eggars, snout moths, or lappet moths)
Bombycoidea
Anthelidae (Australian lappet moth)
Apatelodidae (American silkworm moths)
Bombycidae (silk moths)
Brahmaeidae (Brahmin moths)
Carthaeidae (Dryandra moth)
Endromidae (Kentish glory and relatives)
Eupterotidae
Phiditiidae
Saturniidae (saturniids)
Sphingidae (hawk moths, sphinx moths and hornworms)
Noctuoidea
Erebidae (underwing, tiger, tussock, litter, snout, owlet moths)
Euteliidae
Noctuidae (daggers, sallows, owlet moths, quakers, cutworms, darts)
Nolidae (tuft moths)
Notodontidae (prominents, kittens)
Oenosandridae
Drepanoidea
Drepanidae (hook-tips)
Cimeliidae (gold moths)
Doidae
Geometroidea
Sematuridae
Pseudobistonidae
Epicopeiidae (oriental swallowtail moths)
Uraniidae
Geometridae (geometer moths)
Superfamily unassigned
Millieriidae
Note: division Monotrysia is not a clade.
Portals:
Taxon identifiers
Hedylidae
Categories: