| Revision as of 04:27, 27 October 2019 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,037 edits →Please comment on Talk:Fianna Fáil: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:18, 8 January 2025 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,588 edits Undid revision 1268171999 by 86.99.128.147 (talk); New posts at the bottom pleaseTag: Undo | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| | algo = old(15d) | | algo = old(15d) | ||
| | archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| | counter = |
| counter = 20 | ||
| | maxarchivesize = 150K | | maxarchivesize = 150K | ||
| | archiveheader = {{Aan}} | | archiveheader = {{Aan}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| | minthreadsleft = 8 | | minthreadsleft = 8 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{DS/aware|ipa}} | {{DS/aware|ipa|muh-im|a-i}} | ||
| {{Archive box | {{Archive box | ||
| |auto=yes | |auto=yes | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| |search=yes | |search=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| <!-- | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/ | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| |age=2160 | |||
| |archivebox=no | |||
| |maxarchsize=80000 | |||
| |box-separator=no | |||
| |minkeepthreads=8 | |||
| |headerlevel=2 | |||
| }} --> | |||
| == |
== Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment == | ||
| ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| As per ], these two pages were made with promotional intention and user pushed names of these two people in several articles. How it can be removed? Will you help me in doing so?—<b> ]</b><sup>]</sup> 10:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi Harsil, the right thing to do would be to create a page on the book, and make both these pages redirect to the book. The authors are not notable in my view, but the book is. | |||
| : However, I don't have the energy or interest in working on this. I would suggest just brutally deleting all the junk they added and retain the factual information along with what the book reviews say. Somebody will come along eventually to make them into better articles. -- ] (]) 13:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::On my to-do list ..... ]] 14:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == . == | |||
| == Requesting comments from you == | |||
| {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Can you please comment on the ongoing discussion ]. You are an experienced editor who routinely edits that article. Regards, <span style="font-size:0.9em;letter-spacing:0.1em">— ''']''' ]</span> 14:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : {{U|Vaibhavafro}}, I haven't commented because I don't know much of ]. It seems to be a one-man shop. If so, it would be necessary to find coverage in secondary sources. -- ] (]) 14:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit Request for Audrey truschke == | |||
| :: {{re|Kautilya3}} It is a one-man shop. Sounds like propaganda upon reading. And this new editor is not convinced about this, and is engaging in near-edit warring and personal attacks. Unsurprisingly, their editing history is also not clean. Could use your help in combating this. Thanks.<span style="font-size:0.9em;letter-spacing:0.1em">— ''']''' ]</span> 14:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in. | |||
| :: I know my definition of propaganda may differ from others. But tell me, do you roam around calling Muslims as "terrorists and criminals" in India. Genocide Watch suggests so.<span style="font-size:0.9em;letter-spacing:0.1em">— ''']''' ]</span> 15:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers | |||
| == Explanation on reverts == | |||
| Can you explain the reverts you made on the article I recently edited, have you gone through the changes. And can you please give details of reverts rather than just reverting them and asking the users to explain their changes. Thanks. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| : Explanations are generally given in the edit summaries. Did you read them? | |||
| : In any case, I believe you are making changes to the lead that are ]. You need to propose your changes on the article's talk page and obtain ]. -- ] (]) 00:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :I didn't saw any explaination on the reverts just some comments for you that I cannot change something on the page. Can you give me a reason why the changes were not better than the previous version? Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... ] (]) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| :Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- ] (]) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 111986 --> ] (]) 04:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? ] (]) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hello {{U|Virabukkaraya}}, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- ] (]) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. ] (]) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Season's Greetings == | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 112247 --> ] (]) 04:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | <blockquote>When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it." </blockquote> | |||
| (Text on page 17 illustrated in the ] in ]'s ''Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers'', illustrated by ], London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| ]] 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 112462 --> ] (]) 04:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : Thank you {{U|Fowler&fowler}}. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- ] (]) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Happy holidays! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| I saw you again reverted to an old version of the ] article. I think this is incorrect. Check the edit history. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| *11:06, 22 October 2019 Winged Blades of Godric reverted to an old version of ], removing a fair amount of sourced content, during a deletion discussion on this article. | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Happy holidays!''' | |||
| *12:24, 22 October 2019 Aymatth2 reverted this | |||
| |- | |||
| *12:31, 22 October 2019 Winged Blades of Godric reverted a 2nd time | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ ] (]) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *12:36, 22 October 2019 Aymatth2 reverted a second time | |||
| |} | |||
| *12:37, 22 October 2019 Winged Blades of Godric reverted a third time | |||
| : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *12:37, 22 October 2019 Aymatth2 reverted a third time | |||
| I believe the correct thing is to restore the article to its state before this edit warring began. ] (]) 16:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : {{U|Winged Blades of Godric}} is an experienced editor and he is certainly not making frivolous edits. Reverting his work is not the right thing to do in this situation. You need to make your case on the article's talk page and attempt to persuade him as well as other page watchers. | |||
| : If any particular content affects the deletion discussion, you can ask for that version to be preserved until the closure. But, again, you need to explain this on the talk page. -- ] (]) 20:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am an experienced editor and am certainly not making frivolous edits. I added well-sourced and relevant content, which {{U|Winged Blades of Godric}} removed without discussion three times. This was the wrong thing to do, particularly during an AfD, as I told him after reverting his first revert: ]. I believe the version with the content I added is the one that should be discussed on the AfD, and ask that you restore it. {{U|Winged Blades of Godric}} can then make a case for removing the content on the talk page. ] (]) 20:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::I had unwatched the AfD in disgust, but notice that {{U|Winged Blades of Godric}} seems to be edit warring with {{u|SD0001}} there. I have no idea why he feels so strongly about this somewhat obscure (but notable) pundit. It is a mess. ] (]) 20:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Experienced editors engage on the talk page, identify areas of disagreement, and use dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve them. Since you are not yet doing that, I would not regard you as an experienced editor. So, please follow my advice and make your case on the ]. -- ] (]) 20:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::: The discussion is mostly hidden behind hatnotes on the AfD discussion, before and after the edit war, although there was some discussion on the talk page. There was certainly no consensus or attempt to gain consensus by {{U|Winged Blades of Godric}} on removing the content. ] (]) 20:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::: I do not feel passionately about this article, and do not want to waste more time on it. I am mildly irritated by getting a slap on the face. ] (]) 20:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Have a look == | |||
| == WikiProject India Newsletter – October 2019 == | |||
| Have a look at . Seems POV. Thanks. - ] (]) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border: 2px DarkGoldenrod solid; background: white; padding: 0px;" > | |||
| <!---<div style="color:#cf810c; {{box-shadow|0|1px|3px|rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.35)}} {{border-radius|1px}}">---> | |||
| <div style="background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, #ED7A32, white, white, green); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(left, #ED7A32, white, white, green); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(left, #ED7A32, white, white, green); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(left, #ED7A32, white, white, green); background-image: linear-gradient(left, #ED7A32, white, white, green);> | |||
| <center><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt"><font size="18">WikiProject India</center></font></span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| :] '''Newly recognized content''' | |||
| :The month of '''October 2019''' started with ''']''' re-attaining its ] and the ''']''' was recognized as ]. | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| <div style="padding:10px"> | |||
| ] | |||
| </div> | |||
| :Yeah, it is ] and a pretty poor one too. -- ] (]) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Newly nominated content''' | |||
| ::Have a look at changes. Apparently, the user is making a lot of POV changes as of late. I was notified that it is an SP. Regards. - ] (]) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :*] {{icon|flc}} | |||
| :*] {{icon|flc}} | |||
| :*] {{icon|fac}} | |||
| :*] {{icon|gan}} | |||
| :*'']'' {{icon|gan}} | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| <div style="padding:10px"> | |||
| ] | |||
| </div> | |||
| :] ''' News''' | |||
| ::*Article {{Coloredlink|#4f3611|India}} appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page on ]. | |||
| ::*{{Coloredlink|#4f3611|Vijayadashami}} ''(pictured)'' has ended, which celebrates the victory of good over evil. | |||
| ::*There are a lot of high-quality images on which can be used on some India cultural monuments articles. | |||
| ::*{{Coloredlink|#4f3611|Parinda}} is ] on November 3. | |||
| :] '''Miscellaneous''' | |||
| ::*You can join the discussions opened at {{Coloredlink|#4f3611|Misplaced Pages talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics|Noticeboard for India-related topics}}. | |||
| ::*You can join the RfC on superlatives sentence at ]. | |||
| ---- | |||
| == Regarding a concern == | |||
| :] ''' Events''' | |||
| ::<small>Events that occoured on October.</small> | |||
| {{div col}} | |||
| *] (2 October) | |||
| *] (17 October) | |||
| *] (21 October) | |||
| *] (26 October) | |||
| *] (30 October) | |||
| *] (31 October) | |||
| {{div col end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{center|{{flatlist| | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| }}}} | |||
| As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. ] (]) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{center|1=<small>Sent by {{noping|CAPTAIN MEDUSA}} on behalf of WikiProject India. Go ] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.</small>}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| ] (]) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_India/Newsletter/Members&oldid=922481582 --> | |||
| :If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons. | |||
| ==DYK nomination of Maryul== | |||
| :If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- ] (]) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 19:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. ] (]) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Please see new note on your DYK nomination. ] (]) 22:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects. | |||
| :::In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- ] (]) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu ] (]) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- ] (]) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. ] (]) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Your message == | |||
| == Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) is using my IP Address == | |||
| Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. ] (]) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| : How is that possible? In any case, please report it to {{U|cyphoidbomb}}. -- ] (]) 13:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yet another sock CU blocked by Bbb23. ] (]) 01:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 112691 --> ] (]) 04:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 8 January 2025
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request for Audrey truschke
Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
- Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
|
Happy holidays! |
| Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
Have a look at these changes. Seems POV. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is WP:OR and a pretty poor one too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Have a look at these changes. Apparently, the user is making a lot of POV changes as of late. I was notified that it is an SP. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Regarding a concern
As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons.
- If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects.
- In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. Virabukkaraya (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Your message
Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. Chaipau (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)