Talk:Caterina Fake: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:10, 17 November 2019 editClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,379,034 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/2016. (BOT)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:20, 16 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,879,760 editsm →top: -dup blp params; cleanupTag: AWB
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|blp=yes\|listas=Fake, Caterina\|1=
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|collapsed=No\|1=
	{{WikiProject Biography~~\|class=Start\|listas=Fake, Caterina\|living=Yes~~}}		{{WikiProject Biography}}
	{{WikiProject Business~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Business\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Internet~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Internet\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Pittsburgh~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Pittsburgh\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Women~~\|class=Start~~}}		{{WikiProject Women}}
			{{WikiProject Women in Business\|importance=mid}}
	\|blp=Yes}}
			}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Reintroduction of content ==

	{{ping\|David Gerard}} I appreciate the re-revert, but I'm confused why the neutral text attributed to reliable sources needs going through. I recognize that the (likely self-written) short bios of the subject that were previously used as sources were not ideal, and I have removed them. There may be a lack of independent sources used, but there is no synthesis of primary sources occurring here.

	But, regardless of the sources, Fake being listed on the ''Time'' 100 is a large factor in her notability – why would a tag not have simply been placed on the source to question its reliability or on the prose to question its neutrality? Removal of verifiable statements because of the strength of a source or link rot is what caught my attention. ] (]) 22:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


	{{u\|RaphaelQS}}, regarding ], does the subject being in ''Time'' magazine's list of the 100 most influential people in ''the world'' in 2006 under the category "Builders and Titans" not make her a leader even within Silicon Valley? I made it more specific, but I'm not sure how that improperly summarized recognition she has received. ] (]) 04:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:20, 16 November 2024

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Business Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Categories:

Revision as of 23:10, 17 November 2019 editClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,379,034 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/2016. (BOT)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:20, 16 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,879,760 editsm →top: -dup blp params; cleanupTag: AWB
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|blp=yes\|listas=Fake, Caterina\|1=
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|collapsed=No\|1=
	{{WikiProject Biography~~\|class=Start\|listas=Fake, Caterina\|living=Yes~~}}		{{WikiProject Biography}}
	{{WikiProject Business~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Business\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Internet~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Internet\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Pittsburgh~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Pittsburgh\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Women~~\|class=Start~~}}		{{WikiProject Women}}
			{{WikiProject Women in Business\|importance=mid}}
	\|blp=Yes}}
			}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Caterina Fake/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Reintroduction of content ==

	{{ping\|David Gerard}} I appreciate the re-revert, but I'm confused why the neutral text attributed to reliable sources needs going through. I recognize that the (likely self-written) short bios of the subject that were previously used as sources were not ideal, and I have removed them. There may be a lack of independent sources used, but there is no synthesis of primary sources occurring here.

	But, regardless of the sources, Fake being listed on the ''Time'' 100 is a large factor in her notability – why would a tag not have simply been placed on the source to question its reliability or on the prose to question its neutrality? Removal of verifiable statements because of the strength of a source or link rot is what caught my attention. ] (]) 22:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


	{{u\|RaphaelQS}}, regarding ], does the subject being in ''Time'' magazine's list of the 100 most influential people in ''the world'' in 2006 under the category "Builders and Titans" not make her a leader even within Silicon Valley? I made it more specific, but I'm not sure how that improperly summarized recognition she has received. ] (]) 04:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)