Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Brunello Rosa: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:55, 15 December 2019 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,939 editsm Signing comment by Biancalu123 - "→Brunello Rosa: "← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:03, 20 December 2019 edit undoPrimefac (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators209,642 edits →Brunello Rosa: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫ ===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ] (]) 16:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
⚫ ===]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Brunello Rosa}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Brunello Rosa}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 13: Line 18:
*'''Delete'''. I found this through the academics and educators deletion sorting list, but he appears not to be an academic economist, his scholarly publications in economics are minimal and largely uncited, and so ] seems out of the question and we are left with ]. It is difficult to discern from the sourcing of the article (where nothing is a footnote and everything is an external link) but most sources seem to be by him not about him, and the rest are spammy press-release journalism rather than in-depth stories about him written and published by others. Searching Google News for his name largely confirmed this picture. So I don't see a pass of ], but maybe it is buried under the unsourced detail and bad sources of the existing article? Even if so, ] applies. —] (]) 18:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. I found this through the academics and educators deletion sorting list, but he appears not to be an academic economist, his scholarly publications in economics are minimal and largely uncited, and so ] seems out of the question and we are left with ]. It is difficult to discern from the sourcing of the article (where nothing is a footnote and everything is an external link) but most sources seem to be by him not about him, and the rest are spammy press-release journalism rather than in-depth stories about him written and published by others. Searching Google News for his name largely confirmed this picture. So I don't see a pass of ], but maybe it is buried under the unsourced detail and bad sources of the existing article? Even if so, ] applies. —] (]) 18:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
**I see that the nominator has now been blocked for sockpuppetry. Nevertheless I think the AfD should continue in good faith. —] (]) 19:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC) **I see that the nominator has now been blocked for sockpuppetry. Nevertheless I think the AfD should continue in good faith. —] (]) 19:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. If there's notability, the article certainly doesn't make the case for it. ]. Comment that the nominator seems to have been blocked for leaving a delete vote (now reverted) on this page while logged out. ] (]) 00:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}
I agree with both ] and ]. Also, as you can see from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=brunello+rosa&btnG= Mr Brunello's scholarly articles not only are never cited, but they also seem not to exist! ] is right, he does not appear on LSE's professor list and from his own website it seems he has only taught TWO classes! I think his wiki page should be removed <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 16:03, 20 December 2019

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Brunello Rosa

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Brunello Rosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, the notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article. This article is a self-promotional page, please verify the content. eg. “In September 2017 he co-founded, with renowned economist Nouriel Roubini, Rosa&Roubini Associates, an independent consultancy firm, in which he serves as CEO and head of research“. There is a substantial difference between self-promotion and being a public figure. Misplaced Pages is not a collection of indiscriminate information and cannot be used for self promoting professional activities. The article is just the personal page of the corporate website of the company Mr. Rosa runs. Please check https://rosa-roubini-associates.com/brunello-rosa. Second, the article is poorly sourced and it's self referential it doesn't provide a neutral point of view. Furthermore, the article claims that Mr Rosa is fellow at the systemic risk centre at LSE, but it is not possible to verify it http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/people. Mr Rosa can ask the universities - where he allegedly claims to work - to host his personal page and can always contributes to the development of wikipedia pages on economy. In conclusion, this page is a self-promotional biography based on self-promotional and self-published sources. Misplaced Pages is not a collection of indiscriminate information and cannot be used for self promoting professional activities. I propose to delete the biography of this person is not encyclopedic and does not respect wikipedia standards. Can an uninvolved editor evaluate the article to make sure it is respecting wiki policy, fairly written and properly sourced? Ms4263nyu (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ms4263nyu (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ms4263nyu (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ms4263nyu (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. I found this through the academics and educators deletion sorting list, but he appears not to be an academic economist, his scholarly publications in economics are minimal and largely uncited, and so WP:PROF seems out of the question and we are left with WP:GNG. It is difficult to discern from the sourcing of the article (where nothing is a footnote and everything is an external link) but most sources seem to be by him not about him, and the rest are spammy press-release journalism rather than in-depth stories about him written and published by others. Searching Google News for his name largely confirmed this picture. So I don't see a pass of WP:GNG, but maybe it is buried under the unsourced detail and bad sources of the existing article? Even if so, WP:TNT applies. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. If there's notability, the article certainly doesn't make the case for it. Blow it up. Comment that the nominator seems to have been blocked for leaving a delete vote (now reverted) on this page while logged out. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.