Misplaced Pages

User talk:Historyday01: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:57, 15 January 2020 editGlitchyM. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,420 editsm →Response to removal← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:57, 27 December 2024 edit undoHistoryday01 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,965 editsNo edit summary 
(874 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archives}}
Hello everyone. I'm just a guy on the internet editing pages in my spare time away from work and everything else. Not much else to say.
{{considering retirement|strongly=no}}
Note: I am considering either full retirement or semi-retirement, per what is stated at ], possible sometime in 2025. We will see what happens.--] (]) 21:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Template:User articles created|57}}


] (]) 17:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for March 18==


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


:]
::added a link pointing to ]


'''Hello!'''
:]
Feel free to post comments, suggestions, and whatnot, and I'll do my best to respond to them in a timely manner. Please do not '''''ever''''' invite me to participate in AfD discussions as you can't trust ''anyone'' there to lend a helping hand, and I know this from experience. July 22nd will live as a day of infamy, a day in which my dastardly block ended.--] (]) 20:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
::added a link pointing to ]


'''Reminder about talk page guidelines'''
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


] and ] state:
Seems fine with me.] (]) 14:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


<blockquote> Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page...Generally, you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving or interpolating your own replies to individual points. This causes confusion with who said what and obscures the original editor's intent.</blockquote>
==Disambiguation link notification for March 28==


], which lists examples of appropriately editing others' comments (italics is my emphasis):
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


<blockquote>Personal talk page cleanup...Removing prohibited material such as libel; legal threats; personal details; content that is illegal under US law; or violations of copyright, living persons, or anti-promotional policies...Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling, and vandalism. This generally does not extend to messages that are merely uncivil; deletions of simple invective are controversial. Posts that may be considered disruptive in various ways ''are another borderline case and are usually best left as-is or archived''...Your idea of what is off topic may differ from what others think is off topic, so ''be sure to err on the side of caution''</blockquote>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


] states (italics is my emphasis):
==Disambiguation link notification for April 4==


<blockquote>''So long as no one has yet responded to your comment'', it's accepted and common practice that you may continue to edit your remarks for a short while to correct mistakes, add links or otherwise improve them. If you've accidentally posted to the wrong page or section or if you've simply changed your mind, it's been only a short while and no one has yet responded, you may remove your comment entirely. But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, ''it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes''...To add an explanation of your change, you may add a new comment directly below your original or elsewhere in discussion as may be most appropriate; insert a comment in square brackets.</blockquote>
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


] states:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


<blockquote>User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively. The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion. Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving.</blockquote>
==Disambiguation link notification for May 4==


] states:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


<blockquote>Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. If a user removes material from their talk page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents; this is true whether the removal was manual or automatic. There is no need to keep them on display, and usually users should not be forced to do so.</blockquote>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


Current draft pages:
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
* ] (created; rejected, at least for now)
* ] (created)
* ] (created)
* ] (created)
* ] (updated)
* ] (updated)
* ]


Currently watching:
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Historyday01. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


Current drafts in progress:
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


* ] (work in progress)
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
* ] (work in progress)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
* ] (work in progress)
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=813459745 -->
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (currently just notes)
* ] (currently just notes)
* ] (currently just notes)
* ] (currently just notes)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ] (work in progress)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==Disambiguation link notification for December 14==


Keeping a watch on and updating view counts every so often:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>


* ] (last updated 12.01.24)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
* ] (last updated 12.01.24)


] and ] are usually updated pretty frequently so I'm not going to worry about those.
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==


==Disambiguation link notification for August 26 ==
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Historyday01. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


(].) --] (]) 07:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 -->


== Shows with LGBTQ characters that were only confirmed later in the original work ==
==Disambiguation link notification for November 2==


Hello! What do you think about characters who weren't (yet) stated or revealed as gay in the adaptation but went through that phase later in the original manga or LN? Skip since the anime hasn't positioned characters this way yet? In some cases this "gay thing" was already in the show, it's just that the adapted chapters at the time didn't confirm it yet. ] (]) 08:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>


:How about creating tentative entries for them (and put them in a section on the ] page) and IF it is confirmed in the anime adaptation, THEN add it into the main page?--] (]) 01:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 07:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
:: So you're suggesting we keep it until the anime confirms it too? ] (]) 06:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, we should keep it until the anime confirms it, but still go to the effort to create tentative entries, if that makes sense. I say that because there's already a sourcing problem with entries across the Lists of animated series with LGBT characters, so I don't want to cause any more issues. ] (]) 12:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
:::: Reasonable. I just noticed that some all-female works have rather platonic anime adaptations, while further LN or manga confirms the relationships of the characters or at least the identity of one of them. But if we think about it, we won’t always be able to say that the author had this in mind back then. ] (]) 13:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for September 2 ==
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ].
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


(].) --] (]) 07:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ].
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=926750390 -->


The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
==Disambiguation link notification for December 25==


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ], ] and ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;).


==Disambiguation link notification for October 29 ==
(].) --] (]) 08:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
==Response to removal of references==


(].) --] (]) 07:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
I removed them because they were placed in the wrong series. For e.g. you placed Boogiepop references into Wataten. I didn't know where exactly to place them for the Boogiepop table so I ended up just removing it from Wataten. Sorry about that...] (]) 20:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


== List intersection ==
Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know. Feel free to add anything else to the page, because I'm always trying to add more. Hopefully the page will ultimately be split off into other pages. But, its not at that stage...yet.--] (]) 23:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


Hello! The Kanojo mo Kanojo controversy once again reminded me of one thing. Since some characters are obviously worthy or could potentially be on different LGBTQ lists, in controversial cases this leads to the fact that a dispute about a particular character can affect several pages at once, including their show. In this case, the dispute about Saki was actually divided into three parts, which is why I even had to decide to freeze the dispute in other articles, so as not to waste energy on 3 disputes about the same thing at once and in the future decide on them based on the original discussions on the front page talk page. What do you think about this? Is there a way to somehow resolve the issue of intersections to avoid such cases in the future? I haven't looked at the other pages, but remembering our conversation, I wouldn't be surprised if Oscar ends up in the same story. Not to mention that articles about trans and lesbian characters seem to simply duplicate information about such characters from the general list. Or even includes many characters that have already been removed from the main as original research. ] (]) 23:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
==Response to removal==


:Hmm, you make a good point here. Maybe we can make an informal list (I could refashion one of my sandboxes for it) of characters which are disputed which span different pages? It might be useful. However, it could take time to assemble a list and decide ''which'' characters are disputed. ] (]) 01:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
I get what you mean though. XD Majority of the anime with lesbian themes on this list were added by me almost two years ago, and I was constantly reminded to always add some referencing (instead of always referring to original research). For advice, I would just let the series finish first before finding traces of LGBTQ+ characters...unless maybe there's sources from the manga that already confirm them to be the latter. ;) Moreover, along the lines of referencing, it would also be beneficial to shorten some references, because excessive use of them could make the article waaaay top big (and
:: This is a good idea, but I naturally do not require you to do this immediately or against your wishes. This is a global issue, so it can be left for later. Just to keep that in mind, as they say. ] (]) 02:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
this article has had an ongoing problem with that). :P ] (]) 06:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

==Season's Greetings==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]

<div style="font-size: larger; text-align: center">Hello there! ] (]) wishes you & yours ]!<br /><br />Whether you celebrate ], ], ], ],<br />] (for the rest of us!) or even the ],<br />here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and<br />- '''especially''' -<br />
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.<br />CHEERS!<br /><br /></div>

<div style="font-size: smaller; text-align: center;">Share these holiday wishes by adding '''<code><nowiki>{{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}}</nowiki></code>''' to your friends' talk pages.</div>
{{clear}}
</div><small>''(Sent: 08:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC))''</small> ] (]) 08:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks so much! ] (]) 03:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:57, 27 December 2024

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10

CONSIDERING RETIREMENT Historyday01 is considering retirement, although nothing is set in stone...

Note: I am considering either full retirement or semi-retirement, per what is stated at WP:RETIRE, possible sometime in 2025. We will see what happens.--Historyday01 (talk) 21:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

This user has created 57 articles on Misplaced Pages.



Hello! Feel free to post comments, suggestions, and whatnot, and I'll do my best to respond to them in a timely manner. Please do not ever invite me to participate in AfD discussions as you can't trust anyone there to lend a helping hand, and I know this from experience. July 22nd will live as a day of infamy, a day in which my dastardly block ended.--Historyday01 (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Reminder about talk page guidelines

WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS and WP:INTERLEAVE state:

Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page...Generally, you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving or interpolating your own replies to individual points. This causes confusion with who said what and obscures the original editor's intent.

WP:TALKOFFTOPIC, which lists examples of appropriately editing others' comments (italics is my emphasis):

Personal talk page cleanup...Removing prohibited material such as libel; legal threats; personal details; content that is illegal under US law; or violations of copyright, living persons, or anti-promotional policies...Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling, and vandalism. This generally does not extend to messages that are merely uncivil; deletions of simple invective are controversial. Posts that may be considered disruptive in various ways are another borderline case and are usually best left as-is or archived...Your idea of what is off topic may differ from what others think is off topic, so be sure to err on the side of caution

WP:TALK#REPLIED states (italics is my emphasis):

So long as no one has yet responded to your comment, it's accepted and common practice that you may continue to edit your remarks for a short while to correct mistakes, add links or otherwise improve them. If you've accidentally posted to the wrong page or section or if you've simply changed your mind, it's been only a short while and no one has yet responded, you may remove your comment entirely. But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes...To add an explanation of your change, you may add a new comment directly below your original or elsewhere in discussion as may be most appropriate; insert a comment in square brackets.

WP:OWNTALK states:

User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively. The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion. Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving.

WP:BLANKING states:

Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. If a user removes material from their talk page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents; this is true whether the removal was manual or automatic. There is no need to keep them on display, and usually users should not be forced to do so.

Current draft pages:

Currently watching:

Current drafts in progress:


Keeping a watch on and updating view counts every so often:

Helluva Boss and Hazbin Hotel are usually updated pretty frequently so I'm not going to worry about those.

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grace Harriet Spofford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Record.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Shows with LGBTQ characters that were only confirmed later in the original work

Hello! What do you think about characters who weren't (yet) stated or revealed as gay in the adaptation but went through that phase later in the original manga or LN? Skip since the anime hasn't positioned characters this way yet? In some cases this "gay thing" was already in the show, it's just that the adapted chapters at the time didn't confirm it yet. Solaire the knight (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

How about creating tentative entries for them (and put them in a section on the Talk:List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present page) and IF it is confirmed in the anime adaptation, THEN add it into the main page?--Historyday01 (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
So you're suggesting we keep it until the anime confirms it too? Solaire the knight (talk) 06:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Yes, we should keep it until the anime confirms it, but still go to the effort to create tentative entries, if that makes sense. I say that because there's already a sourcing problem with entries across the Lists of animated series with LGBT characters, so I don't want to cause any more issues. Historyday01 (talk) 12:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Reasonable. I just noticed that some all-female works have rather platonic anime adaptations, while further LN or manga confirms the relationships of the characters or at least the identity of one of them. But if we think about it, we won’t always be able to say that the author had this in mind back then. Solaire the knight (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of black animated characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Barry Mitchell and Avengers Assemble.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Mysticons characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mysticons characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Mysticons characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

List intersection

Hello! The Kanojo mo Kanojo controversy once again reminded me of one thing. Since some characters are obviously worthy or could potentially be on different LGBTQ lists, in controversial cases this leads to the fact that a dispute about a particular character can affect several pages at once, including their show. In this case, the dispute about Saki was actually divided into three parts, which is why I even had to decide to freeze the dispute in other articles, so as not to waste energy on 3 disputes about the same thing at once and in the future decide on them based on the original discussions on the front page talk page. What do you think about this? Is there a way to somehow resolve the issue of intersections to avoid such cases in the future? I haven't looked at the other pages, but remembering our conversation, I wouldn't be surprised if Oscar ends up in the same story. Not to mention that articles about trans and lesbian characters seem to simply duplicate information about such characters from the general list. Or even includes many characters that have already been removed from the main as original research. Solaire the knight (talk) 23:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, you make a good point here. Maybe we can make an informal list (I could refashion one of my sandboxes for it) of characters which are disputed which span different pages? It might be useful. However, it could take time to assemble a list and decide which characters are disputed. Historyday01 (talk) 01:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This is a good idea, but I naturally do not require you to do this immediately or against your wishes. This is a global issue, so it can be left for later. Just to keep that in mind, as they say. Solaire the knight (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Hello there! ★Trekker (talk) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa,
Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia,
here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and
- especially -
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.
CHEERS!

Share these holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}} to your friends' talk pages.

(Sent: 08:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)) ★Trekker (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Historyday01 (talk) 03:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)