| Revision as of 21:08, 11 December 2006 editShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits →thank you. can you help further?: re← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:31, 10 October 2014 edit undoShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits clearing talk page |
| (67 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{busy}} |
|
{{archive box|]}} |
|
|
==Somalian Articles== |
|
|
|
|
|
i agree there needs to be done more.. |
|
|
|
|
|
i probably won't have time to start any articles untill this wednesday but when i do have the time i will add and expand as much as i can and i appreciate the fact you want to help thanks! ] 22:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==CSD warning template== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, looks like you just used a template to warn an editor that an article s/he created has been tagged for speedy deletion. Can you point me to that template? Thanks. | ] <small>]</small> 18:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:¡Muchas gracias! | ] <small>]</small> 19:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== sources == |
|
|
|
|
|
there are 2 sources on the ] page like you suggested, if you could take a moment to see if they have been done correctly... |
|
|
|
|
|
cheers, ] 15:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks! Misplaced Pages articles cannot be used as references, so I removed that reference. Also, could you please provide some more information about the book "Earth and Space"? My searches return that this is a children's book with no 2005 edition, so I perhaps I am finding the wrong book. ] 17:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Good call == |
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, thanks. Those two! --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Hoaxers== |
|
|
Thanks for your help re:capurt etc. maybe we can warn/ban all the members of that hoaxing crew as well: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--] 19:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:If this really is a hoax, I would guess that these are socks created for the purpose of perpetuating the hoax. I think the afd should play out before anyone gets a warning. If the article is real, these people have some remarkably specialized knowledge (given the complete absence in anything I've searched) and we've already bitten them a little. ] 19:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::{{tl|db-vandalism}} says that vandalism speedily deletable. ] lists "Silly vandalism: Creating joke or hoax articles ...". As written, hoaxes fall under ] G3. ] ] 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::] says hoax articles cannot be speedily deleted. However, I won't remove your speedy tag. ] 20:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Lol== |
|
|
Why do you hate Mel? ] 23:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== removing categories == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please direct your attention to ] instead of batch reverting all the edits. |
|
|
] 22:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:We apparently wrote each other at the same time. I wrote on your talk page about this categorization scheme. ] 22:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::I noticed :-) Since both threads cover the same topic, and this one was started first, I suggest continuing it here. Or on ]. Whichever is more appropriate. |
|
|
::] 22:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Perhaps you could explain to me why categorizing people based on the games they play is a good idea? I'm sure that ] or ] may very well play this game, but I don't see why it is relevant. What if they publicize that they're avid ] fans, shall we categorize them as such? This is ]. I'm not even sure if this category should exist in the first place. ] 22:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::# It's not a game |
|
|
::::# It is a valid category |
|
|
::::## ] is a valid article |
|
|
::::## ] under ] is not as appropriate as categorising them as a ]. Doing so would make about as much sense as categorising a person under the religion they subscribe to as opposed to a category for people who subscribe to a religion. |
|
|
::::## Look at the definition of the term '''Resident''' on the ] article |
|
|
::::## Look at the ] at sometime in the future. |
|
|
:::: While some people might not meet the definition of ], some people definately do- ], ] etc. So I'll admit I was perhaps a little over-zealous with running through the entire list. |
|
|
::::] 23:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I can see that ] may belong in this category because this person is notable for playing Second Life. Of the people you've added to this category, whose activities in Second Life are noteworthy? Are there more than one or two? Also, if you're going to add these categories, you at least need to write some supporting text. (For example, the ] article doesn't make a single mention of Second Life.) ] 23:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::: Similarly, if you find something that doesn't have supporting text in an article, you should go looking for it and add it instead of just removing it. |
|
|
::::::] 00:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::See ]. ] is a rather arbitrary category and there is no mention whatsoever in the biographies of these people. I thought it was some sort of strange vandalism until I realized the category was growing and that you'd just created it. ] 02:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::: See ] yourself. If a person is on the list on ], it's because they match the definition for one of the sections. |
|
|
::::::::] 23:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::I think you misunderstood me. I see that the editors there did a high quality job of tracking down references. At any rate, I've nominated the category for deletion and left a note on your talk page. ] 23:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Lawrence Lessig category == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I just reverted your edit to ]. I readded the category because while it isn't mentioned in the article about Lessig, it is both mentioned and sourced in the ] article. Just figured I'd let you know. Thanks, ] 01:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
== iSilo == |
|
|
Your point makes sense, and all the more so since the SandalNET page was deleted by KissMyHuman, sorry for the problem, Patrick |
|
|
:Oh, there is certainly no need to be sorry. It happens to a lot of people... you were ]. Feel free to contact me if you ever have a question. ] 19:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Your edit to ]== |
|
|
Your recent edit to ] () was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair ] to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''']''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // ] 19:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:AntiVandal bot! Ah! (I was undoing a cut-paste move on ] done by a vandal) ] 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Reagan== |
|
|
But now there's no link to wikiquote anywhere on the page. In contrast, there is a link to Wikiversity, which yields nothing about Reagan.] 01:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Oops, that was my fault. I didn't think to replace that link. It should be fixed now. ] 04:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== thank you. can you help further? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your advise and removal of the email address. can you please help me to wikify my article about shyama chittar. she is my Mom and I want to preserve her profile online through this site. I request you not to delete any detail while changing the format. It has taken me lot of time to collect this detail and a lifetime for my Mom. I do not have any links on internet regarding her career or haven't found it as yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
i wanted to put some contact info on this profile for our far away friends to get in touch with us. what can be done for same? |
|
|
|
|
|
regards |
|
|
Kunal Chittar <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 16:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|
|
:It is very kind of you to write about your mother and contribute to wikipedia. You are also lucky to have a such an accomplished mother. There are some guidelines and policies that I'd like to point out. |
|
|
:*]: Misplaced Pages should ''never'' be used as a means to stay in touch with friends or family. |
|
|
:*]: All articles must be neutral. |
|
|
:*]: We shouldn't write about people to whom we are closely related. |
|
|
:These policies mean that you should probably refrain from writing your mother's biography. I will cleanup, wikify, and expand on her biography so you don't have the need. In the meantime, I need you to tell me whether or not your mother satisfies any of the ] for musicians on wikipedia. Regards, ] 21:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
