Revision as of 00:52, 12 December 2006 editZetawoof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,441 edits npa2← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:30, 6 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(37 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Croatia - Serbia = | |||
==Your unjustified reverts to Neo-Nazism article== | |||
The following ''3RR'' and ''Personal Attack'' messages are related to your unjustified edits and comments in the ] article. The reason that the reverts don't all show up here is that the editor associated with this talk page doesn't have a Misplaced Pages account, and has used an anonymous IP to make the destructive changes and comments in the article in question. | |||
⚫ | |||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst:subst:subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> | |||
<br><br> | |||
{{personal attack}} ] 17:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you want to fight revert war no problem but you must know pages of war. You think that Croatia kingdom has more or less never existed. I think that Stefan Uroš IV Dušan of Serbia has not been emperor because he has declared himself emperor. For him it has been possible to declare himself God and Serbia population of that time will say: Yes master. Croatia has more argument (which you have not defeated on discussion page) to be kingdom of 1 Serbian king which has declared himself emperor. ] 08:21, 21 May 2007 (CET) | |||
= Incorrect vandalism warning = | |||
{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Neo-Nazism|With regards to your comments on ]: }}Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> ]<sup>(])</sup> 00:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Sorry about that, I was just reverting a little bit too quickly. ] | ] 02:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
= Starcevic = | |||
You should take care about this article - due to the fact that you considerably contributed there. | |||
Hope you'll read this message soon. | |||
--] 19:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
= Croatization = | |||
Hi, | |||
Would you, please, be interested in expanding, clarifying, and improving http://en.wikipedia.org/Croatisation ??? | |||
Regards, | |||
--] 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
= Neo-Nazism = | |||
Hey, thanks for your constructive input here (e.g. your last replacement of the broken reference link). Having just been ] by GiorgioO, your non-destructive edit brightened my day. :-) I still sincerely believe we can come to an agreement on this text; I only ask for correct English and verification... sigh. Here's to consensus! ] 15:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
= Unjustified block = | |||
{{unblock reviewed|1=The Checkuser is quite clear - I am definitely not Puger nor GiorgioOrsini - | |||
as per | |||
⚫ | <br> | ||
''Inconclusive. None of them are IP-related. Giorgio and Nova are geographically very | |||
close to each other. Giove is not even hemispherically related. --jpgordon???? 15:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)''<br> | |||
and as per | |||
''Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk) 03:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).''<br> | |||
So, I'd ask someone to remove this pointless block from my account. Thank you. --] 04:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)|decline=No, the CheckUser stated that the evidence was '''inconclusive''', not that the accounts are unrelated. ] ] 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)}} {{unblock|Here is just another sound proof of my innocence - July 28 200 as per Checkuser | |||
Modelsides = GiorgioOrsini. '''NovaNova unrelated'''. 02:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC) --] 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC}} |
Latest revision as of 12:30, 6 March 2023
Croatia - Serbia
If you want to fight revert war no problem but you must know pages of war. You think that Croatia kingdom has more or less never existed. I think that Stefan Uroš IV Dušan of Serbia has not been emperor because he has declared himself emperor. For him it has been possible to declare himself God and Serbia population of that time will say: Yes master. Croatia has more argument (which you have not defeated on discussion page) to be kingdom of 1 Serbian king which has declared himself emperor. Rjecina 08:21, 21 May 2007 (CET)
Incorrect vandalism warning
Sorry about that, I was just reverting a little bit too quickly. Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Starcevic
You should take care about this article - due to the fact that you considerably contributed there. Hope you'll read this message soon.
--Giorgio Orsini 19:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Croatization
Hi,
Would you, please, be interested in expanding, clarifying, and improving http://en.wikipedia.org/Croatisation ???
Regards,
--Giorgio Orsini 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Neo-Nazism
Hey, thanks for your constructive input here (e.g. your last replacement of the broken reference link). Having just been bitten by GiorgioO, your non-destructive edit brightened my day. :-) I still sincerely believe we can come to an agreement on this text; I only ask for correct English and verification... sigh. Here's to consensus! SociableLiberal 15:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Unjustified block
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).NovaNova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The Checkuser is quite clear - I am definitely not Puger nor GiorgioOrsini -
as per
Inconclusive. None of them are IP-related. Giorgio and Nova are geographically very
close to each other. Giove is not even hemispherically related. --jpgordon???? 15:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
and as per
Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk) 03:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).
So, I'd ask someone to remove this pointless block from my account. Thank you. --NovaNova 04:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, the CheckUser stated that the evidence was inconclusive, not that the accounts are unrelated. Shadow1 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Here is just another sound proof of my innocence - July 28 200 as per Checkuser
Modelsides = GiorgioOrsini. NovaNova unrelated. 02:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC) --NovaNova 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC}}