Misplaced Pages

Stephen Barrett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:37, 14 December 2006 editShot info (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,052 edits Cases covered in other articles excised and summerised← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:54, 6 December 2024 edit undoColonies Chris (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers445,699 editsm minor fixes, replaced: New York City → New York City (2), , MD → , Maryland (3), - → –Tag: AWB 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|American psychiatrist (born 1933)}}
{{POV}}
{{other people|Stephen Barrett|Stephen Barrett (disambiguation)}}
]
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2013}}
'''Stephen J. Barrett''', M.D. (born ]), is a retired ] ] and ] best known for his ] related work regarding health issues. He is a founder of the ] (NCAHF) and webmaster of twenty-two websites which describe what he considers to be "] and health ]," most notably on ], a non-profit consumer information website partially funded through donations and book sales. He bases his writings in ], ], and ]. Barrett's critics have accused him of bias, lack of objectivity, and of lacking the proper credentials to make certain charges. He has been involved in litigation and has filed several ] lawsuits with mixed outcomes.
{{Infobox person
| name = Stephen Barrett
| image = Stephen Barrett seated at desk crop.jpg
| image_size =
| caption =
| birth_name = Stephen Joel Barrett
| birth_date = {{birth year and age|1933}}
| birth_place = New York City, U.S.
| death_date =
| death_place =
| education = ]
| occupation = Psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, webmaster
| years_active = 1961–1993 (psychiatry)
| known_for = Being the webmaster of ]
| spouse = Judith Nevyas Barrett<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biovitae.html |title=Stephen Barrett, M.D. Curriculum Vitae |last=Barrett |first=Stephen |date=December 21, 2016 |website=Quackwatch |access-date=February 25, 2017 |quote=Wife, Judith Nevyas Barrett, M.D., is a retired family practitioner.}}</ref><ref name="biography">{{cite news |last=Rosen |first=Marjorie |date=October 1998 |title=Interviews – Stephen Barrett, M.D. |url=https://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biography.html |newspaper=Biography Magazine |access-date=February 25, 2017}}</ref>
| children = 3
| website = {{URL|quackwatch.org|QuackWatch.org}}
}}


'''Stephen Joel Barrett''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|b|æ|r|ɪ|t}}; born 1933) is an American retired ], author, co-founder of the ] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of ]. He runs a number of websites dealing with ] and health fraud. He focuses on ], ], and ].<!-- A long list is already referenced in the body of the article. This is the LEAD where things are abbreviated. -->
==Biography==
Barrett is a ] graduate of the ] and was a licensed physician until retiring from active practice in ]. He resides in ]. He has said that his appreciation of medical science probably began with a college course in medical statistics, from which he "learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning". He went on to say "My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud." <ref> Response to a survey by "Spiked-online" </ref>


==Early life and education==
In addition to webmastering his websites, Barrett is a founder, vice-president and a board member of the ](NCAHF). He is an advisor to the ], and a Fellow of the ] (CSICOP). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at ].
Barrett was born in New York City. He is a 1957 graduate of the ] and completed his psychiatry ] in 1961. In 1968, he completed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at ] in ].<ref name="QWBIO">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=Curriculum Vitae |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biovitae.html |publisher=] |date=June 24, 2007 |access-date=July 18, 2007}}</ref>


==Career==
Barrett is the medical editor of ] and is a peer-review panelist for several top medical journals. He has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include '']'', the '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', ], ], and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews.
Barrett was a practicing physician until retiring from active practice in 1993. {{As of|2019}}, his ] was listed as "Expired" in good standing: "No disciplinary actions were found for this license."<ref>{{Cite web |url = http://www.licensepa.state.pa.us/Details.aspx?agency_id=1&license_id=528406& |title = Pennsylvania Department of State; Stephen Barret Medical License Status and standing |access-date = November 19, 2015 |publisher = Pennsylvania Department of State; to be considered a primary resource }}{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><!--verifiable by searching here: https://www.pals.pa.gov/#/page/search--> A longtime resident of ], Barrett now resides in ].<ref name="mcall">{{cite news |first=Ann |last=Wlazelek |title=Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters' |url=https://www.mcall.com/2007/06/13/allentown-critic-of-quacks-moves-to-milder-winters-stephen-barrett-73-says-hell-keep-exposing-false-medical-claims/ |work=] |date=June 13, 2007 |access-date=September 25, 2014}}</ref>


In addition to ]ing his websites, Barrett was a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the ] (NCAHF). He is a scientific advisor to the ], and a fellow of the ] (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught ] at ].
Barrett's work has received numerous awards, including the Best physician-authored site by MD NetGuide, May 2003. <ref name="nettie">Staff report. ''MDNetGuide'', May/June 2003.</ref> He has been named as one of the outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by '']''. <ref name="csicop"></ref> In ], he received an ] Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery. In ], he was awarded honorary membership in the ]. Barrett has been profiled in ''Biography Magazine'' <ref name="rosen">Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). ''Biography Magazine''</ref> and in '']''. <ref name="jaroff">Jaroff, Leon (April 30, 2001). '']'', via chiro.org, retrieved July 29, 2006.</ref>


Barrett was the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at ],<ref name="prometheus books">{{cite web |url=http://www.prometheusbooks.com/PBcatalog.pdf|title=Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog|access-date=March 29, 2007|page=63 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061114180455/http://www.prometheusbooks.com/PBcatalog.pdf |archive-date = November 14, 2006}}</ref> and has been a ] panelist for <ref name="SBcv">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch |url=http://www.quackwatch.com/10Bio/bio.html |publisher=Quackwatch |date=June 4, 2007 |access-date=August 12, 2007}}</ref> two<ref name="jama_peer_reviewer1">{{cite journal |first=Elaine S |last=Williams |title=The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit |journal=] |date=April 21, 1999 | doi = 10.1001/jama.281.15.1443 |volume=281 |issue=15 |page=1443|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="jama_peer_reviewer2">{{Cite journal|title=JAMA Peer Reviewers for 2003|date=February 11, 2004|journal=JAMA|volume=291|issue=6|pages=751–764|doi=10.1001/jama.291.6.751|s2cid=162455343 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="annals_peer_reviewer">{{cite journal |title=Thanks to Reviewers-2001 |journal=] |date=December 18, 2001 |volume=135 |issue=12 |pages=1098–1106 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00033|s2cid=53089455 |doi-access= }}</ref> ]s. He has also served on the editorial board of ]<ref name="medscape">{{cite journal |title=Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape |journal= MedGenMed|pmid=11104430 | page=E28 | last1 = Lundberg | first1 = GD | year=1999}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> and the '']''.<ref name="SRAM">{{cite web |title=The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine |date=August 15, 2002 |url=http://www.quackwatch.com/04ConsumerEducation/sram.html |publisher=Quackwatch |access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', ], ], and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."<ref name="SBcv" /><ref name=GMA_04_07_2009>Sintay and Hagan. . Barrett participated on '']'', April 7, 2009.</ref>
==Online activism==
The ] website is Barrett's main platform for describing that which he considers to be quackery and health fraud. The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." <ref></ref> Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from 150+ scientific, technical, and lay volunteers. <ref name="advisors">Barrett SJ. Quackwatch. Retrieved July 19, 2006.</ref> Barrett defines ''quackery'' as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health," <ref name="quackdef">Barrett SJ. Quackwatch. Retrieved July 19, 2006.</ref> and reserves the word ''fraud'' "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved." <ref name="frauddef">Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT (January 3, 2001). Quackwatch. Retrieved July 19, 2006.</ref>


Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003.<ref name=nettie>{{cite web |url=http://www.mdnetguide.com/departments/may_june2003/cover.html |title=Pass the Envelope, Please...: ''Best Physician- Authored Site'' |work=MD Net Guide |date=May–June 2003 |access-date=April 3, 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20030625042915/http://www.mdnetguide.com/departments/may_june2003/cover.html |archive-date = June 25, 2003}}</ref> In 1984, he received an ] Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery.<ref name="Medical_Reporter">{{cite web|author=Joel R. Cooper|url=http://medicalreporter.health.org/tmr0199/consumerfraud.html |title=Consumer Health Fraud...don't be a victim! Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D. |work=The Medical Reporter|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061212174116/http://medicalreporter.health.org/tmr0199/consumerfraud.html|archive-date=December 12, 2006 }}</ref> He was included in the list of outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by '']'' magazine.<ref name="csicop">{{cite web |title=Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century |url=http://www.csicop.org/articles/19991214-century/ |work=] |access-date=August 12, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070715132139/http://www.csicop.org/articles/19991214-century/ |archive-date = July 15, 2007}}</ref> In 1986, he was awarded honorary membership in the ].<ref name="Medical_Reporter" /> Barrett has been profiled in ''Biography Magazine'' (1998)<ref name="rosen">{{cite news |first=Marjorie |last=Rosen |title=Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biography.html |work=Biography Magazine |date=October 1998 |access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref> and in '']'' (2001).<ref name="jaroff">{{cite news |first=Leon |last=Jaroff |title=The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010430-107254,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050406044958/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010430-107254,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 6, 2005 |work=] |date=April 30, 2001 |access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref>
Barrett has written about numerous modalities that he (based on his analysis of the claims made for them) either considers ''to be'' quackery, or ''to include'' it in one way or another, for example: ]; ]-based therapies; ]; ] within dentistry; ]; ] medicine; ]; ]; ]; ]; ] and minerals; ]; ] therapies; ]; ]s; ]; ]s; ]; Genetic diagnoses; ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; ]; Juicing; ]; Metabolic therapy; Nutritional therapy for emotional problems; ]; ]; Pneumatic trabeculoplasty; ]; and ].


The magazine '']'' included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons<ref name="Spiked_Interviewees">{{cite news |title=What Inspired You? – Index of Survey responses |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/atoz/ |work=] |access-date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref> they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine."<ref name="Spiked_Introduction">{{cite news |title=What Inspired You? – Introduction |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/ |work=Spiked-Online |access-date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref><ref name="Spiked_Online">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=What Inspired You? – Survey responses – Dr Stephen Barrett |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/article/1336 |work=Spiked-Online |access-date=July 23, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120920174441/http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/inspired/article/1336/|archive-date=September 20, 2012 }}</ref> When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:
Barrett, on his main website, also maintains public lists of sources, individuals, and groups which he considers questionable and non-recommendable, <ref name="nonrecsource">Barrett SJ. Quackwatch. Retrieved July 19, 2006.</ref> <ref name="nonrec">Barrett SJ. Quackwatch. Retrieved July 19, 2006.</ref> including two-time ] winner ] (for his claims about mega-doses of ] <ref name="pauling">Barrett SJ (May 5, 2001). via Quackwatch. Retrieved July 29, 2006.</ref>) and integrative medicine proponent ]. <ref name="weil">Relamn AS (December 14, 1998). '']'', via Quackwatch.</ref>.


<blockquote>probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud.<ref name="Spiked_Online" /></blockquote>
==Controversies & Litigation==
===Accusations of bias and lack of objectivity===


===Quackwatch===
Barrett has ongoing disputes with a number of individuals, largely as a result of his widely-publicised views on non-traditional health practices.
{{main|Quackwatch}}
The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be ] and health fraud.<ref name="quacks">
{{cite news
|first=Fred D
|last=Baldwin
|url=http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html
|title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ...
|access-date=September 16, 2007
|publisher=MedHunters |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080206060833/http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html |archive-date = February 6, 2008}}</ref> The website was part of Quackwatch, Inc., a ] founded by Barrett that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." The non-profit was dissolved in 2008.<ref name="mission_statement">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD
|last=Barrett
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/mission.html
|title=Quackwatch mission statement
|access-date=August 16, 2007
|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref> Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from many scientific, technical, and lay volunteers and includes numerous references to published research articles.<ref name="advisors">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD
|last=Barrett
|title=150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/09Advisors/advbd.html
|publisher=Quackwatch
|date=January 28, 2003
|access-date=May 21, 2015}}</ref> Barrett defines ''quackery'' as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health,"<ref name="quackdefinition">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD
|last=Barrett
|title=Quackery: How Should It Be Defined?
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef.html
|publisher=Quackwatch
|access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref> and reserves the word ''fraud'' "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved."<ref name="frauddefinition">{{cite news
|author=Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef2.html
|title=Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions
|publisher=Quackwatch
|access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref>
Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope."<ref name="jaroff" /><ref name="Ladd"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140123015421/http://www.villagevoice.com/1999-06-22/news/doctor-who/ |date=January 23, 2014 }} by Donna Ladd, '']'', June 23–29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects."<ref name="Barrett">{{cite news
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/faq2.html
|author=Barrett SJ
|title=How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced?
|access-date=August 16, 2007
|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref> Barrett is at the forefront of exposing questionable aspects of ].<ref>{{cite book |pages=171–72 |chapter= The truth about chiropractic therapy |title= Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine |author= Singh S, Ernst E |year=2008 |publisher= W.W. Norton |isbn=978-0-393-06661-6}}</ref>


Barrett is a strong supporter of the ] and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it.<ref name="Wanjek">Christopher Wanjek. '']'', April 20, 2004; Page HE01</ref>
*As part of his activities Barrett wrote a short email to Sahelian inquiring about his relationship with Physician Formulas. Ray Sahelian, B.Sc.(]) M.D., is Board certified in Family Medicine, the author of health related books, an expert in nutrition and a proponent of supplements. <ref name="SahelianBio">''Biography of Ray Sahelian, M.D.'' from .</ref> According to Sahelian, the "rude" e-mail prompted him to comment:


A number of practitioners and supporters of ] oppose Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd" /><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">{{cite journal | last1 = Hufford | first1 = David J. |authorlink1=David Hufford | year = 2003 | title = Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists | journal = The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | volume = 31 | issue = 2| pages = 198–212 | doi = 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00081.x | pmid = 12964264 | s2cid = 29859505 }}. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See {{cite journal | last1 = Schneiderman | first1 = Lawrence J. | year = 2003 | title = Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life | journal = The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | volume = 31 | issue = 2| pages = 191–198 | doi = 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00080.x | pmid = 12964263 | s2cid = 43786245 }}</ref> ], a journalist with '']'', says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable due to methodological flaws. According to Ladd, Barrett insists that most alternative therapies "simply should be disregarded without further research. 'A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense', he says, pointing to ], chiropractic, and ] as examples of alternative treatments with no plausible mechanism of action."<ref name="Ladd" />
::''"Dr. Barrett does some good in pointing out scams in the alternative health field, but, in my opinion, he is not fair and balanced, and he is not a true objective scientist as he claims to be. Someone who has a website specifically tailored for criticism needs to have higher and more objective scientific standard, and Barrett fails in this regard."'' He asks: ''"Why has Stephen Barrett, M.D. focused most of his attention on the nutritional industry and has hardly spent time pointing out the billions of dollars wasted each year by consumers on certain prescription and non-prescription pharmaceutical drugs?"'' <ref name="Sahelian"> via www.raysahelian.com. Retrieved August 27, 2006</ref>


Both website reviews<ref name="The Good Web Guide">{{cite book
:Barrett admits to not giving ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site:
|author=Arabella Dymoke
|title=The Good Web Guide
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JCipdQBDUucC&pg=PA35
|year=2004
|publisher=The Good Web Guide Ltd
|isbn=978-1-903282-46-5
|page=35
|quote=Quackwatch is without doubt an important and useful information resource and injects a healthy dose of scepticism into reviewing popular health information. Its aim is to investigate questionable claims made in some sectors of what is now a multi-million pound healthcare industry.}}</ref><ref name="ascp">{{cite news
|first=Bao-Anh
|last=Nguyen-Khoa
|title=Selected Web Site Reviews — Quackwatch.com
|url=http://www.ascp.com/publications/tcp/1999/jul/access.shtml
|publisher=]
|date=July 1999
|access-date=June 24, 2013
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318041703/http://www.ascp.com/publications/tcp/1999/jul/access.shtml
|archive-date=March 18, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="forbes">{{cite web
|url=https://www.forbes.com/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=865
|work=]
|title=Best of the Web website reviews: Quackwatch.
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080114071544/http://www.forbes.com/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=865
|archive-date=January 14, 2008 }}</ref><ref name="thedietchannel">{{cite news
|title=Diet Channel Award Review Of Quackwatch
|url=http://www.thedietchannel.com/Quackwatch-Review.htm
|access-date=September 18, 2007
|quote=Quackwatch is a very informative site which informs you about health fraud and gives you advice on many decisions.}}</ref><ref name="USNWR1999">{{cite news|title=The Best of The Web Gets Better
|url=https://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/991115/archive_002597_7.htm
|work=US News
|date=November 7, 1999
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060524122033/http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/991115/archive_002597_7.htm |archive-date=May 24, 2006 }}</ref> and various journal articles<ref name="AJPE">{{Cite journal
|pmc = 1803699
|year = 2006
|last1 = Pray
|first1 = W. S.
|title = Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns with Unproven Medications
|journal = American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
|volume = 70
|issue = 6
|pages = 141
|pmid = 17332867
|doi = 10.5688/aj7006141}}</ref><ref name="JME">{{cite journal
|doi=10.1177/0273475303257763
|title=If it Walks Like a Duck...: Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education
|journal=Journal of Marketing Education
|volume=26
|pages=4–16
|year=2004
|last1=Chonko
|first1=Lawrence B.
|s2cid=167338734
|id={{ERIC|EJ807197}}}}</ref><ref name="MJA" >{{Cite journal
|pmid = 16336135
|year = 2005
|last1 = Sampson
|first1 = Wallace
|title = Propagation of the absurd: Demarcation of the absurd revisited
|journal = The Medical Journal of Australia
|volume = 183|issue = 11–12
|pages = 580–1
|last2 = Atwood IV
|first2 = Kimball|doi = 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00040.x
|s2cid = 43272637
}}</ref><ref name="JADA">{{cite journal
|doi=10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00117-1
|title=Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them
|journal=Journal of the American Dietetic Association
|volume=101
|issue=4
|pages=460
|year=2001
|last1=Cunningham
|first1=Eleese
|last2=Marcason
|first2=Wendy}}</ref><ref name=JAMA>{{cite journal
|doi=10.1001/jama.280.15.1380
|title=Click here: How to find reliable online health information and resources
|journal=JAMA
|volume=280
|issue=15
|pages=1380
|year=1998
|pmid=9794323}}</ref><ref name="The Lancet">{{Cite journal
|doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78918-2
|title = Medical quackery squashers on the web
|journal = The Lancet
|volume = 351
|issue = 9114
|pages = 1520
|year = 1998
|last1 = Larkin
|first1 = Marilynn|s2cid = 54300255
}}</ref> mention or use as references Stephen Barrett's ''Quackwatch'' as a useful source for consumer information. However, other authors have criticised Quackwatch as being overly biased in its presentation.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Okasha | first1 = Mona | year = 2000 | title = Quackery on the web – questionable cancer therapies | url = https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(00)00162-5/fulltext | journal = The Lancet Oncology | volume = 1 | issue = 4| page = 251 | doi = 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00162-5 }}</ref><ref>Cuzzell, Jane. (2000). "", ''Dermatology Nursing'', Apr. 2000, p. 134. Accessed 6 November 2019.</ref><ref name=Vankevitch>{{cite book|author=Vankevitch, Ned|chapter=Limiting Pluralism|editor=Ernst, Waltraud |title=Plural medicine, tradition and modernity, 1800-2000 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year=2002 |pages=219–244|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DVp71Gp4eE4C|isbn=978-0-415-23122-0}}</ref>


In February 2020, Quackwatch became part of the ]. CFI maintains its various websites.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fidalgo |first1=Paul |title=Quackwatch Joins the Center for Inquiry |url=https://centerforinquiry.org/press_releases/quackwatch-joins-the-center-for-inquiry/ |website=Center for Inquiry |date=February 26, 2020 |access-date=26 February 2020}}</ref>
::''"... quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish "balanced" articles about unbalanced subjects. Do you think that the press should enable rapists and murderers to argue that they provide valuable services?"'' <ref name="Barrett"> retrieved September 8, 2006</ref>.


== Publications ==
:Sahelian admits that he is not "perfectly fair" either:
Barrett's articles include:
* In 1985, Barrett was the author of the "Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?" article in the '']'' that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He commented that in his opinion, "commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). ''JAMA'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">, Seidel S, et al., ''JAMA''. 2001;285:67–72.</ref>
* , Rosa L, ], Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). '']'', Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005–1010.


His (co)authored and (co)edited books include:<ref name="booklist">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biobooks.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=Books and book chapters|access-date=February 12, 2007|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref>
::''"Am I, Ray Sahelian, M.D., perfectly fair in my review of supplement research? No, I am not, and I don't believe anyone can be. It is well known in psychology that people perceive things according to how they want to see them."'' <ref name="Sahelian"/> (See: ]). Sahelian says: ''"We did not feel the need to respond to Stephen Barrett, M.D. It is quite presumptuous of him to probe in this manner, plus I felt it was a rude way of asking. There was no polite introduction such as "Dr. Sahelian, I hope you are well, would you mind if I ask you a personal question" or ending the request with something like "thanks for your time," or 'sincerely' etc. Ending the email with "or what?" is extremely impolite and shows lack of manners and sensitivity. Didn't Stephen Barrett's mother, father, or schoolteacher teach him the proper way to address a letter? If he had addressed the letter politely, I would have asked my staff to respond to him."'' <ref name="Sahelian"/>
* ''Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions'', Barrett S, ], Kroger M, ], ] (2013). (textbook, 9th ed.) McGraw-Hill, {{ISBN|978-0078028489}}
* ''Dubious Cancer Treatment'', Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the ]
* ''Chemical Sensitivity: The Truth About Environmental Illness'' (Consumer Health Library), Barrett, SJ & Gots, Ronald E. (1998). Prometheus Books. {{ISBN|9781573921954}}
* ''The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America'', Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, {{ISBN|0-87975-855-4}}
* ''Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds'', Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, {{ISBN|0-89043-330-5}}
* ''Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods'', Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). ], {{ISBN|0-89970-525-1}}
* ''The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods'', Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, {{ISBN|0-87975-909-7}}
* ''Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm?'', Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins {{ISBN|0-397-53060-9}} (edited by Barrett, won the ] award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by ]).


Collections of articles:
*Some assertions of Sahelian find support in an article by Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D.(MIT), ] of the Department of ] & ] at ]. <ref> </ref> Kauffman analyzed eight Quackwatch articles, including five written by Stephen Barrett, and found them to be:''contaminated with incomplete data, obsolete data, technical errors, unsupported opinions, and/or innuendo'' and gives numerous examples with extensive, peer reviewed references, stating that: ''"it is very probable that many...have been misled by the trappings of scientific objectivity,"'' <ref name="Kauffman">Kauffman 2001. Joel M. Kauffman, "Alternative Medicine: Watching the Watchdogs at Quackwatch", Website Review, '']'' 16(2), 312-337 (2002). </ref> "With 80 papers on chemical and medical topics, and 11 patents, including 2 on antituberculosis drugs, Dr. Kauffman has turned his attention to exposing fraud in medicine"<ref> CV, Joel M. Kauffman</ref>and is also author of ''Malignant Medical Myths: Why Medical Treatment Causes 200,000 Deaths in the USA each Year and How to Protect Yourself.''<ref>ISBN 0-7414-2909-8 Joel Kauffman, ''Malignant Medical Myths: Why Medical Treatment Causes 200,000 Deaths in the USA each Year and How to Protect Yourself.'' Infinity Publishing (January 30, 2006) ISBN 0-7414-2909-8</ref> Kauffman's review was published in the '']'', a peer-reviewed publication which provides "a professional forum for presentations, criticism, and debate concerning topics which are for various reasons ignored or studied inadequately within mainstream science." <ref name="JSE">"Mission Statement", Journal of Scientific Exploration </ref>
* ''Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis'', 2007, edited by Bryan Farha, ], {{ISBN|978-0-7618-3772-5}}. Three of the eighteen chapters are written by Barrett.


== See also ==
*An article in the '']'' written by journalist ] also raised the issue of Barrett's objectivity. Ladd wrote: He does not criticize conventional medicine because he says ''"that's way outside my scope"'' but he depends heavily on negative research and case studies in which alternative therapies do not work to criticize alternative medicine. According to Barrett, most case studies that show positive results of alternative therapies are unreliable and he believes most alternative therapies simply should be disregarded without further research. She then quotes Peter Barry Chowka, a former adviser to the National Institutes of Health's Office of Alternative Medicine as saying of Barrett that ''"He seems to be putting down trying to be objective."'' <ref name="Ladd">via http://www.villagevoice.com. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref>
* '']''

*As president of the ], James A. Mertz, DC, DACBR wrote in a letter to Time in 2001: ''"The American public is being grossly misled by Dr. Stephen Barrett. While he positions himself as a protector of the public, his statements are, in reality, so one-sided that he simply cannot be taken seriously."'' <ref> </ref>

*Lorraine Day M.D, a proponent of natural and alternative therapies, states that "''a large percentage of people realize that Stephen Barrett is just a shill for Organized Medicine and the Pharmaceutical Companies''". "''Stephen Barrett, along with his cronies in Organized Medicine and the Pharmaceutical Industry, would like you to believe that you have no control over your health – no control over whether or not you develop disease. He wants you to be totally helpless. He wants you to have to rely on the drug doctors who will give you dangerous pills that will only cover up the symptoms and never cure the disease.''" <ref name="drday">''New York Times attacks Dr. Day, April 21, 2006'', Lorraine Day, MD. </ref>

*There are ongoing disputes and lawsuits involving "health freedom" attorney Carlos Negrete, who accuses Barrett of acting ''"like a shill for the medical and pharmaceutical cartels"''. <ref name="BreakingNews!!!">Negrete CF (October 22, 2005). </ref>

*Tim Bolen, who also acts on behalf of some of those criticised by Quackwatch, accuses Barrett of ], and being part of a ] to suppress ''"innovative forms of treatment".'' <ref name="bolendeposition"> (]) ''In re Cavitat Medical Technologies v. Aetna'', No. 04-cv-01849-MSK-MEH</ref>. Bolen is ''"hired by clients to deal with their public relations component of when they may be attacked by medical board or similar entity".'' <ref name="bolendeposition"/>

*A number of practitioners criticized by Barrett held degrees from the now-defunct ]. <ref name="CPUclose">Barrett SJ (2000). Retrieved July 23, 2006.</ref> <ref name="CPU-ca">California Department of Consumer Affairs. Columbia Pacific University ordered to close permanently. News Release, Jan 13, 2000.</ref> One such alumnus, Paul Hartal, writes: ''Barrett's "Quackwatch" misleads the public. His method of data selection is guided by the principle of not letting the facts interfere with his biased judgement of wholistic therapies. He has no training in natural medicine, herbalism, chiropractic, ayurveda, yoga, acupuncture, homeopathy, or other alternative health care modalities, but nevertheless he dismisses all non allopathic practices as frauds.'' <ref name="hartal">Debunking "Quackwatch", Why the Medical Establishment Attacks Columbia Pacific University, Paul Hartal, PhD, </ref>

*] proponent ], M.D. has called Barrett ''"a self-appointed vigilante for the suppression of curiosity"'' after Barrett called Chopra a purveyor of ''"] mumbo jumbo."'' <ref name="jaroff"/>

*Alternative medicine proponent Burton Goldberg wrote: ''"It is genuinely hard to imagine how a suffering patient could actually be persuaded by Barrett to dismiss alternative approaches when the conventional ones were not useful, or even worse, were harmful."'' <ref name="goldberg">''What's Eating Stephen Barrett?'', Burton Goldberg, Alternative Medicine Digest, July 1998 </ref> Goldberg continues, ''"In the paradox of 'quackbusting,' the quackbusters say they're protecting public health, but in fact, they're abandoning the public to their own suffering to protect the financial interests of conventional medicine, which has no interest in or ability to produce benefits for these conditions. The 'quackbusters' say they're serving the public, but the truth is they're grossly disserving patients.''<ref name="goldberg"/> Barrett describes himself as an author, editor, consumer advocate and expert in medical communications.<ref></ref>

===Litigation===

In a biographical article about Barrett, Fred D. Baldwin wrote:

:''"Despite Barrett's pattern of naming names of people as well as products, he has never been sued for libel, except for a counter-suit to a libel suit ''he'' once filed (the counter-suit was dismissed <ref name="barrettVnegreteRemand">'' , (Mem,. No. 04-55193 D.C. No. CV -02-0221 O-JML; No. 03-56663 D.C. No. CY -02-0221 O-JML March 14, 2005).</ref>). His explanation? 'I protect myself by not saying anything that isn't true.'"'' <ref name="baldwin_bio"> by Fred D. Baldwin, Summer 2002 issue of MedHunters magazine.</ref>

Barrett has filed several ] suits against various individuals who have reposted Tim Bolen's "opinion pieces." <ref name="opinion_pieces"></ref> Barrett considers certain claims made in them to be libelous, and has explained why he has therefore filed the libel suits:

:''"None of us are thin-skinned or care when people attack our ideas. But unjustified attacks on our character or professional competence are another matter. As Bolen's campaign unfolded, my colleagues and I have notified him and many of the people spreading his messages that libel is a serious matter and that they had better stop. Some did, but it soon became clear that others would not. To defend ourselves, several of us have filed suit for libel."'' <ref name="bolen_response"></ref>

Barrett and the NCAHF have had mixed results in these cases. Courts dismissed two of the suits under ] (SLAPP) statutes and ordered Barrett and the NCAHF to pay attorneys' fees of the parties they sued. The results of such lawsuits are explained below.

====Libel suits filed by Barrett====

'''Barrett v. Mercola suit'''

*In October 2000, Barrett filed a ] suit in ] against ], a Board Certified ]ic ] in ]. {{citation needed}} In June 2001, Barrett withdrew the suit on jurisdictional grounds and refiled it in Illinois on July 30, 2001. <ref></ref> On April 17, 2003 the suit was dismissed by mutual agreement. <ref></ref>

'''Barrett v. Clark suits'''

*In November 2000, Barrett and two associates sued ], Tim Bolen, Jan Bolen, David P. Amrein, Ilena Rosenthal, and their related companies. <ref name="barretvbolen">'''' Case No. SJBMVHC165479</ref> On July 25, 2001, the judge ruled against all three plaintiffs regarding Ilena Rosenthal only. Nothing she had written was considered to be defamatory, nor could the plaintiffs provide any evidence of damage, as required in a ] lawsuit. <ref name="casp>''Order Granting Defendant's Special Motion to Strike, (Barrett v Clark),'' California Anti-SLAPP Project. </ref>

*In 2003, his case against Carlos F. Negrete and ] was dismissed under SLAPP. <ref name="barrettvnegrete">'''' (]) Civil No 02-CV-2210-L(RBB)</ref>

*In 2005, an appeals court reversed the district court's decision, and the case against Carlos F. Negrete and ] was remanded for further procedings. "The scurrilous nature of the defendants' allegations of wrongdoing and their efforts to publicize them widely on the Internet, when coupled with their utter failure to offer any proof of their charges" provided sufficient reason for the case to proceed. <ref name="barrettVnegreteRemand">'' , (Mem,. No. 04-55193 D.C. No. CV -02-0221 O-JML; No. 03-56663 D.C. No. CY -02-0221 O-JML March 14, 2005).</ref>

'''] suit'''

*This case was originally called "Barrett v. Clark." It is a California Supreme Court case concerning Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Court determined that that the defendant Ilena Rosenthal, was immune from liability under Section 230 and upheld the lower courts decisions as to Barrett's claims.

'''Barrett v. Fonorow suit'''

*In July 2001, Barrett filed a libel suit against Owen R. Fonorow, and Intelisoft Multimedia, Inc.<ref>''Barrett v. Fonorow'', 18th Cir., DuPage County, Illinois, No. 01 L 820.</ref> That case was dismissed, and Fonorow filed a motion for sanctions, which was also dismissed. Both lower court decisions were affirmed on appeal. <ref name="fonorowappeal">See Circuit Court of Du Page County, '''', No. 2--02--0886.</ref>

'''Barrett v. Sherrell suit'''

*In November 2002, a federal court judge in Eugene, Oregon ruled that Barrett is a ''"public figure and the defamatory statements involve a matter of public concern, and that plaintiff has failed to meet his burden to prove actual malice, and/or actual injury"''. The judge dismissed Barrett's $100,000 defamation lawsuit against ] advocate Darlene Sherrell. <ref name="sherrell"> (]) 99-813-HO, 2002.</ref>

===Credentials===
Regarding his qualifications on alternative medicine modalities, to the question ''"What qualifies you to write on so many topics?"'' Barrett answers:

:''"My medical education has provided the background to understand most aspects of health, disease, and health care. Many experts are available to review what I write and answer questions that come up. The most convenient is my wife, who happens to be a very scholarly family physician. Much of my writing is based on my own investigations of the health marketplace."'' <ref> </ref>

Although he has provided expert testimony as a psychiatrist, a discipline in which he practiced for thirty years, Barrett was never board certified in psychiatry. He qualified as a physician in 1957 and completed his psychiatry residency in 1961, but failed the neurology portion of the optional board certification exam in 1964. According to Barrett, only about 1/3 of psychiatrists were board certified at the time so he chose not to resit, because ''"when I began practice (early 1960s), nobody cared,"'' and ''"I was grandfathered on the staffs of the hospital clinics where I worked and was not dependent on HMOs for private patients."'' <ref>Dr. Barrett responds: It had no effect on my career. "MD1954" is correct that nowadays, lack of certification would make it difficult to repeat what I did. However, when I began practice (early 1960s), nobody cared. Requirements for hospital staff membership and HMO participation began to tighten during the 1980s, but I was grandfathered on the staffs of the hospital clinics where I worked and was not dependent on HMOs for private patients. Sbinfo 16:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)</ref> <ref></ref> In the 1970s the number of board-certified medical specialists rose steeply <ref></ref> and when Barrett retired in 1993, about 81% of eligible physicians (74% of total physicians) were board certified by the ]. <ref name="ABMS">American Board of Medical Specialties. (])</ref> Barrett says that ''"nowadays, lack of certification would make it difficult to repeat what I did."''

According to Negrete, Barrett claimed to be a "legal expert" even though he had not completed his formal legal training. <ref> </ref> In one court case the Judge said "Dr. Barrett's purported legal and regulatory knowledge is not apparent. He is not a lawyer." <ref> Case No. BC 245271, affirmed on appeal by Grignon et. al. in 2003 </ref> <ref> (])</ref> According to his CV he completed 1½ years of the correspondence program in American Law and Procedure, at the now defunct ], Chicago, from 1966 to 1968. <ref name="Barrett CV"> Retrieved July 25, 2006</ref>

Judge Haley J. Fromholz wrote in a court decision:
:''"(Barrett) has no formal training in homeopathic medicine or drugs, although he claims to have read and written extensively on homeopathy and other forms of alternative medicine."''<ref> summary of the judgment</ref>
Ray Salhelian M.D. adds:

:''"According to the Quackwatch website, Stephen Barrett, M.D. says this about quackery: "Dictionaries define quack as 'a pretender to medical skill; a charlatan' and 'one who talks pretentiously without sound knowledge of the subject discussed.'" <ref> </ref> <ref> - Online dictionary</ref> ''"Stephen Barrett, M.D. does not have a degree in nutrition science. He has been trained in Psychiatry but has not practiced psychiatry for many, many years and has, to the best of my understanding, never practiced nutritional medicine. In my opinion, Stephen Barrett, M.D., when it comes to the field of nutritional supplements, can be easily defined as a Quack since he pretends to 'have skills or knowledge in supplements and talks pretentiously' without actually having clinical expertise or sound knowledge of herbal and nutritional medicine."'' <ref name="Sahelian"/>

Julian M. Whitaker, M.D., in a 1997 letter to Lyn Behrens, Ph.D. President, Loma Linda University also raised the issue of Barrett's credentials in nutrition : " Under cross examination, Dr. Barrett admitted that he was not in fact, an expert in nutrition science, describing himself instead as an expert in 'consumer strategy' and a "journalist.'" <ref> - NCAHF Posts Names of 2,500 Physicians on Quack List </ref>

==Selected publications==
In 1985, Barrett was the author of an article in the ] that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He concluded that ''"commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."'' <ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). '']'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable." <ref>, Seidel S, et al. , '']''. 2001;285:67-72.</ref>

His 50 books <ref></ref> include:

*''<u>Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions</u>'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, Kroger M, London WM (2006). (textbook, 8th ed.) McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-248521-3

*''<u>Dubious Cancer Treatment</u>'' - Barrett SJ (2001). Florida Division of the ]

*''<u>The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America</u>'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-855-4

*''<u>Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds</u>'' - Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, ISBN 0-89043-330-5

*''<u>Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods</u>'' - Hafner AW, Zwicky JF, eds. (1993). ], ISBN 0-89970-525-1

*''<u>The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods</u>'' - Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-909-7

*''<u>Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm?</u>'' - Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISBN 0-397-53060-9 (edited by Barrett, won the ] award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by ]).

==References==
<div class="references-small"><references/></div>

==See also==

* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]


==External links== == References ==
{{Reflist|2}}
===Barrett official website===
* - Guide to quackery and health fraud


== External links ==
===Critics that are or have been involved in litigation with Barrett===
{{commons category}}
* - Carlos Negrete
*
* - Ilena Rosenthal
* - Tim Bolen


{{Authority control}}
===Other links===
* - David Mendosa
* - Fred. D. Baldwin, MedHunters.com
* - The Chiropractic Journal
* - Chiro.org
* - Syd Baumel
* - John "Birdman" Bryant


] {{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett, Stephen}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 14:54, 6 December 2024

American psychiatrist (born 1933) For other people named Stephen Barrett, see Stephen Barrett (disambiguation).

Stephen Barrett
BornStephen Joel Barrett
1933 (age 91–92)
New York City, U.S.
EducationColumbia University
Occupation(s)Psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, webmaster
Years active1961–1993 (psychiatry)
Known forBeing the webmaster of Quackwatch
SpouseJudith Nevyas Barrett
Children3
WebsiteQuackWatch.org

Stephen Joel Barrett (/ˈbærɪt/; born 1933) is an American retired psychiatrist, author, co-founder of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), and the webmaster of Quackwatch. He runs a number of websites dealing with quackery and health fraud. He focuses on consumer protection, medical ethics, and scientific skepticism.

Early life and education

Barrett was born in New York City. He is a 1957 graduate of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and completed his psychiatry residency in 1961. In 1968, he completed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at La Salle Extension University in Chicago.

Career

Barrett was a practicing physician until retiring from active practice in 1993. As of 2019, his medical license was listed as "Expired" in good standing: "No disciplinary actions were found for this license." A longtime resident of Allentown, Pennsylvania, Barrett now resides in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

In addition to webmastering his websites, Barrett was a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF). He is a scientific advisor to the American Council on Science and Health, and a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at Pennsylvania State University.

Barrett was the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at Prometheus Books, and has been a peer-review panelist for two medical journals. He has also served on the editorial board of Medscape and the Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include Dateline, Today, Good Morning America, Primetime, Donahue, CNN, National Public Radio, and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."

Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003. In 1984, he received an FDA Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery. He was included in the list of outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by Skeptical Inquirer magazine. In 1986, he was awarded honorary membership in the American Dietetic Association. Barrett has been profiled in Biography Magazine (1998) and in Time (2001).

The magazine Spiked included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine." When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:

probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud.

Quackwatch

Main article: Quackwatch

The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be quackery and health fraud. The website was part of Quackwatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation founded by Barrett that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." The non-profit was dissolved in 2008. Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from many scientific, technical, and lay volunteers and includes numerous references to published research articles. Barrett defines quackery as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health," and reserves the word fraud "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved." Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope." He states he does not give equal time to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects." Barrett is at the forefront of exposing questionable aspects of chiropractic.

Barrett is a strong supporter of the HONcode and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it.

A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine oppose Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine. Donna Ladd, a journalist with The Village Voice, says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable due to methodological flaws. According to Ladd, Barrett insists that most alternative therapies "simply should be disregarded without further research. 'A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense', he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture as examples of alternative treatments with no plausible mechanism of action."

Both website reviews and various journal articles mention or use as references Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch as a useful source for consumer information. However, other authors have criticised Quackwatch as being overly biased in its presentation.

In February 2020, Quackwatch became part of the Center for Inquiry. CFI maintains its various websites.

Publications

Barrett's articles include:

  • In 1985, Barrett was the author of the "Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?" article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral hair analysis. He commented that in his opinion, "commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal." His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."
  • "A Close Look at Therapeutic Touch", Rosa L, Rosa E, Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). JAMA, Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005–1010.

His (co)authored and (co)edited books include:

Collections of articles:

See also

References

  1. Barrett, Stephen (December 21, 2016). "Stephen Barrett, M.D. Curriculum Vitae". Quackwatch. Retrieved February 25, 2017. Wife, Judith Nevyas Barrett, M.D., is a retired family practitioner.
  2. Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). "Interviews – Stephen Barrett, M.D." Biography Magazine. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
  3. Barrett, Stephen (June 24, 2007). "Curriculum Vitae". Quackwatch. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
  4. "Pennsylvania Department of State; Stephen Barret Medical License Status and standing". Pennsylvania Department of State; to be considered a primary resource. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
  5. Wlazelek, Ann (June 13, 2007). "Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters'". The Morning Call. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  6. "Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog" (PDF). p. 63. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 14, 2006. Retrieved March 29, 2007.
  7. ^ Barrett, Stephen (June 4, 2007). "Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 12, 2007.
  8. Williams, Elaine S (April 21, 1999). "The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit". Journal of the American Medical Association. 281 (15): 1443. doi:10.1001/jama.281.15.1443.
  9. "JAMA Peer Reviewers for 2003". JAMA. 291 (6): 751–764. February 11, 2004. doi:10.1001/jama.291.6.751. S2CID 162455343.
  10. "Thanks to Reviewers-2001". Annals of Internal Medicine. 135 (12): 1098–1106. December 18, 2001. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00033. S2CID 53089455.
  11. Lundberg, GD (1999). "Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape". MedGenMed: E28. PMID 11104430.
  12. "The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine". Quackwatch. August 15, 2002. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
  13. Sintay and Hagan. From Farrah Fawcett to Suzanne Somers: Is Alternative Medicine Safe?. Barrett participated on Good Morning America, April 7, 2009.
  14. "Pass the Envelope, Please...: Best Physician- Authored Site". MD Net Guide. May–June 2003. Archived from the original on June 25, 2003. Retrieved April 3, 2009.
  15. ^ Joel R. Cooper. "Consumer Health Fraud...don't be a victim! Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D." The Medical Reporter. Archived from the original on December 12, 2006.
  16. "Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007. Retrieved August 12, 2007.
  17. Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). "Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D". Biography Magazine. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  18. ^ Jaroff, Leon (April 30, 2001). "The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks". Time. Archived from the original on April 6, 2005. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  19. "What Inspired You? – Index of Survey responses". Spiked-Online. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  20. "What Inspired You? – Introduction". Spiked-Online. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  21. ^ Barrett, Stephen. "What Inspired You? – Survey responses – Dr Stephen Barrett". Spiked-Online. Archived from the original on September 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  22. Baldwin, Fred D. "If It Quacks Like a Duck ..." MedHunters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2007.
  23. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackwatch mission statement". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. Barrett, Stephen, MD (January 28, 2003). "150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors". Quackwatch. Retrieved May 21, 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackery: How Should It Be Defined?". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT. "Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  27. ^ Dr. Who? Diagnosing Medical Fraud May Require a Second Opinion. Archived January 23, 2014, at the Wayback Machine by Donna Ladd, The Village Voice, June 23–29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006
  28. Barrett SJ. "How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced?". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  29. Singh S, Ernst E (2008). "The truth about chiropractic therapy". Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W.W. Norton. pp. 171–72. ISBN 978-0-393-06661-6.
  30. Christopher Wanjek. Attacking Their HONor: Some Dispute Value of Logo Used to Verify Accuracy, Integrity Of Health Web Site Contents. The Washington Post, April 20, 2004; Page HE01
  31. Hufford, David J. (2003). "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 31 (2): 198–212. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00081.x. PMID 12964264. S2CID 29859505.. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Schneiderman, Lawrence J. (2003). "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 31 (2): 191–198. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00080.x. PMID 12964263. S2CID 43786245.
  32. Arabella Dymoke (2004). The Good Web Guide. The Good Web Guide Ltd. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-903282-46-5. Quackwatch is without doubt an important and useful information resource and injects a healthy dose of scepticism into reviewing popular health information. Its aim is to investigate questionable claims made in some sectors of what is now a multi-million pound healthcare industry.
  33. Nguyen-Khoa, Bao-Anh (July 1999). "Selected Web Site Reviews — Quackwatch.com". The Consultant Pharmacist. Archived from the original on March 18, 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2013.
  34. "Best of the Web website reviews: Quackwatch". Forbes. Archived from the original on January 14, 2008.
  35. "Diet Channel Award Review Of Quackwatch". Retrieved September 18, 2007. Quackwatch is a very informative site which informs you about health fraud and gives you advice on many decisions.
  36. "The Best of The Web Gets Better". US News. November 7, 1999. Archived from the original on May 24, 2006.
  37. Pray, W. S. (2006). "Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns with Unproven Medications". American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 70 (6): 141. doi:10.5688/aj7006141. PMC 1803699. PMID 17332867.
  38. Chonko, Lawrence B. (2004). "If it Walks Like a Duck...: Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education". Journal of Marketing Education. 26: 4–16. doi:10.1177/0273475303257763. S2CID 167338734. ERIC EJ807197.
  39. Sampson, Wallace; Atwood IV, Kimball (2005). "Propagation of the absurd: Demarcation of the absurd revisited". The Medical Journal of Australia. 183 (11–12): 580–1. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00040.x. PMID 16336135. S2CID 43272637.
  40. Cunningham, Eleese; Marcason, Wendy (2001). "Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 101 (4): 460. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00117-1.
  41. "Click here: How to find reliable online health information and resources". JAMA. 280 (15): 1380. 1998. doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1380. PMID 9794323.
  42. Larkin, Marilynn (1998). "Medical quackery squashers on the web". The Lancet. 351 (9114): 1520. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78918-2. S2CID 54300255.
  43. Okasha, Mona (2000). "Quackery on the web – questionable cancer therapies". The Lancet Oncology. 1 (4): 251. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00162-5.
  44. Cuzzell, Jane. (2000). "Quackwatch: Your Guide to Health Fraud, Quackery, and Intelligent Decisions", Dermatology Nursing, Apr. 2000, p. 134. Accessed 6 November 2019.
  45. Vankevitch, Ned (2002). "Limiting Pluralism". In Ernst, Waltraud (ed.). Plural medicine, tradition and modernity, 1800-2000. New York: Routledge. pp. 219–244. ISBN 978-0-415-23122-0.
  46. Fidalgo, Paul (February 26, 2020). "Quackwatch Joins the Center for Inquiry". Center for Inquiry. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  47. Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam? JAMA Vol. 254 No. 8.
  48. Assessment of Commercial Laboratories Performing Hair Mineral Analysis, Seidel S, et al., JAMA. 2001;285:67–72.
  49. Barrett SJ. "Books and book chapters". Quackwatch. Retrieved February 12, 2007.

External links

Categories: