| Revision as of 19:57, 18 April 2020 editAbductive (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers128,803 edits →Abusive behavior: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:43, 1 January 2025 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots533,165 edits Notification that File:WMOV-FM 2014.PNG is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
| (861 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==My Restrictions== | |||
| {{User talk:Neutralhomer/TalkHeaderArchive|right}} | |||
| *Indefinite ban on describing any edit as "vandalism". | |||
| {{TOC-right}} | |||
| *Indefinite WP:0RR restriction. | |||
| ---- | |||
| *Indefinite anti-bludgeoning restriction; no more than one edit to a discussion page in a 24-hour period. | |||
| *Indefinite accusation restriction; not allowed to accuse any editor of racism or prejudice. | |||
| *Indefinite restriction on emailing other users. | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:WMOV-FM 2014.PNG== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned non-free use-notice --> --] (]) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Awesome Wikipedian template update== | |||
| Hi there. As an update to ], just to let you know that I restored the content of the template to ] and have updated the code where it was in use. ] (]) 10:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Cordless Larry}} Roger Wilco. :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 15:15 on April 3, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| ==WKAZ-FM== | |||
| Hey you are welcome for the edits on WKAZ FM <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} | |||
| , listen ;) --] (]) 06:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:Help Requested == | |||
| Unfortunately, there is no justification for CSD deletion here. While the article may have been created by a sock, it was done ''before'' the they were blocked as a sock, meaning CSD G5 (creation by a blocked/banned editors) doesn't apply here. We could nominate it at AFD, if you like, but that would shut the door on the article rather permanently. My recommendation would be to just put an {{tl|inuse}} template on it and switch out the old version for your version. Just remember, don't mark the switch as minor and use a good edit summary. ] (]) 08:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I've , though I had to have a RevDel because of a real name issue that I wasn't aware of that popped up about 15 edits deep. :S Oh well, I had a sandbox copy and that worked. :) I have updated everything and to , I'd say I made the article my own. :) | |||
| :Glad we don't have to do that deletion/recreation thing. :) That's a GIGANTIC pain in the butt! :) Thanks for your assistance. :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 08:09 on April 17, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| ::], doesn't apply here? ] clearly states, "''It is not possible to revert newly created pages, as there is nothing to which to revert. Accordingly, pages created by blocked editors are eligible for ]. Any editor can use the template {{tl|db-g5}}, or its shortcuts {{tl|db-banned}} or {{tl|db-blocked}}, to mark such a page. If editors other than the blocked editor have made substantial good-faith contributions to the page or its talk page, it is courteous to inform them that the page was created by a blocked editor, and then decide on a case-by-case basis what to do.''" Of course articles a sock created are deleted after the editor is discovered to be a sock. On the basis of G5, I've had a number of articles deleted after the sock was discovered to be a sock. The only way the editor could have created the article(s) while they were known to be a sock is if they hadn't yet been blocked. And in that case, either they were about to be blocked or another editor was gathering evidence on them. | |||
| ::Please don't ping me if you reply. I will check back for replies. ] (]) 08:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::And ] states, "''This applies to pages created by ] or ] users''' in violation of their ] or ]''', and that have no substantial edits by others. G5 should not be applied to ] templates or to ] that may be useful or suitable for merging.''" By "banned or blocked users", it doesn't mean that the editor created the article with a blocked account. If that account is blocked, they obviously can't use that account. So they use a different one or an IP, which is where block evasion comes in. ] is clear that the block is on the person, not solely the account, which is why an editor using a new account doesn't absolve them of their block. ] (]) 08:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{u|Flyer22 Frozen}}: If {{u|TomStar81}}, an admin, says it's OK, then I believe it's OK. That's why I asked an admin. Now, if he wants to CSD G5 the article, we can do that and I can come in behind and re-create it. I'd prefer, though, not to get into an arguement over it. How about we leave well enough alone? - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 08:49 on April 17, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| :::::Neutralhomer, I never stated that you needed to delete the article, now did I? I am correcting an admin. Admins are not above us. It's important to correct editors on matters such as these so that they don't go spreading their mistaken beliefs across Misplaced Pages. I can easily ping other admins, such as ] (who is also a ]), to make clear that what I stated is correct. I could also post at ] about this and elsewhere for commentary from others. ] (]) 08:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Unfortunately, the only way to correct the issue is to do a CSD G5. That's where the deletion came in. This has been done in the past. It is rare, but it has been done. Though typically, if a long amount of time has passed and the article is notable, sourced, and doesn't have any issues, the creator of the article is overlooked. Now, if the article had like one source and was just created, it would be out the door, no discussion. It's a gray area. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 09:02 on April 17, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| :::::::I am going to lay down for a few. I'll be back up in a bit. If there is a decision regarding the potential deletion, please hold off until I get back up so we don't have a redlink sitting there for a long period of time. Thanks...<small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 09:48 on April 17, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| ::::::::Hi - hope you don't mind me butting in, I just wanted to clear up the point about G5 eligibility. If a page was created by a blocked user, using a sock to evade their block, then G5 definitely does apply even if the page was created before the account was identified as a sock: it's the date of the original block which matters, and deleting stuff created by block-evaders is largely why G5 exists. However, there's no need to worry in this case, because the other part of the G5 criteria is that the page must not have been edited substantially by others - this article has been edited by lots of people (including yourself), so a G5 would be declined. Hope that helps, cheers ]] 12:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {{u|Girth Summit}}: That does help, actually. I was looking at this from both sides of the equation. 1) Since it's been so long and the page has been edited by so many people, it will be overlooked but, 2) I don't mind G5'ing it just to cover all the bases and make everyone happy. :) But if the G5 deletion isn't needed, then we are good to go. :) Thanks for your added input. Much appreciated. :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">] • ] • 13:04 on April 18, 2020 (UTC) • <span style="color:#0000CD;">#StayAtHome</span></small> | |||
| :You're welcome - happy to help! ]] 13:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Abusive behavior == | |||
| Please discontinue your abusive behavior. As you know, it was decided on the talk page some time ago that removing superfluous zeroes from the coordinates of radio stations has consensus, and is a ]. <span style="font-family: Cambria;">] (])</span> 19:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:43, 1 January 2025
My Restrictions
- Indefinite ban on describing any edit as "vandalism".
- Indefinite WP:0RR restriction.
- Indefinite anti-bludgeoning restriction; no more than one edit to a discussion page in a 24-hour period.
- Indefinite accusation restriction; not allowed to accuse any editor of racism or prejudice.
- Indefinite restriction on emailing other users.
Orphaned non-free image File:WMOV-FM 2014.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:WMOV-FM 2014.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
