Misplaced Pages

Postmodernism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:08, 18 June 2020 edit85.167.226.45 (talk) History← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:14, 13 January 2025 edit undoPatrick Welsh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers5,577 edits Bibliography: add source for forthcoming edits 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Artistic, cultural, and theoretical movement}}
{{About|the movement|the architectural style|Postmodern architecture|the condition or state of being|Postmodernity|other uses|Postmodernism (disambiguation)}}
{{About|the artistic, cultural, and theoretical movement|the condition or state of being|Postmodernity|other uses|Postmodernism (disambiguation)}}
{{short description|A broad movement in the mid-to-late 20th century across philosophy, the arts, architecture, and criticism}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2021}}
{{Postmodernism}}
] (1994) by ]: Detail view of the British intelligence service (]) headquarters in London, a "hulking, postmodern fortress" influenced by 1930s industrial modernist design and Mayan and Aztec temples.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Nick |date=2018-01-02 |title=New Digs, Old Digs: Vauxhall Cross, Whitehall, and the London of Craig's Bond |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01956051.2018.1423206 |journal=Journal of Popular Film and Television |language=en |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=25 |doi=10.1080/01956051.2018.1423206 |issn=0195-6051}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Baker |first=Phil |title=SIS/MI6 Building |url=https://90years.buildingcentre.co.uk/building/sis-mi6-building/ |url-status=live |access-date=Jan 2, 2024 |website=]}}</ref>]]
{{Semiotics}}


<!--- PLEASE NOTE THAT PER ] THE LEAD IS A PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE. PER ], THE ARTICLE IS THE SOURCE FOR THE LEAD. ANYTHING THAT IS MISTAKEN OR MISSING FROM THE LEAD NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED OR ADDED WITH ] TO THE BODY OF THE ARTICLE BEFORE ALTERING THE LEAD IN ANY WAY NOT SUPPORTED BY THE BODY. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THE ARTICLE! --->
'''Postmodernism''' is a broad movement that developed in the mid- to late 20th century across ], ], ], and ], marking a departure from ]. The term has been more generally applied to describe ] and the tendencies of this era.
'''Postmodernism''' is a term used to refer to a variety of ], ], and ] movements that claim to mark a break from ]. They have in common the conviction that it is no longer possible to rely upon previous ways of depicting the world. Still, there is disagreement among experts about its more precise meaning even within narrow contexts.
Postmodernism is generally defined by an attitude of ], ], or rejection toward what it describes as the ] and ] associated with modernism, often criticizing ] and focusing on the role of ] in maintaining political or economic power. Postmodern thinkers frequently describe ] claims and ]s as ] or ], describing them as products of political, historical, or cultural ]s and ]. Common targets of postmodern criticism include ] ideas of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to ], ], ] and ], ], and irreverence.


The term began to acquire its current range of meanings in literary criticism and architectural theory during the 1950s–1960s. In opposition to modernism's alleged self-seriousness, postmodernism is characterized by its playful use of ] styles and performative ], among other features. Critics claim it supplants ], ], and ] ideals with mere style and spectacle.
Postmodern critical approaches gained purchase in the 1980s and 1990s, and have been adopted in a variety of academic and theoretical disciplines, including ], ], ], ], ], ], and ], as well as ] in fields such as ], ], and music. Postmodernism is often associated with schools of thought such as ], ], and ], as well as philosophers such as ], ], and ].


In the 1990s, "postmodernism" came to denote a general – and, in general, celebratory – response to ]. Proponents align themselves with ], ], and ]. Building upon ] theory, postmodern thought defined itself by the rejection of any single, foundational historical narrative. This called into question the legitimacy of the ] account of progress and rationality. Critics allege that its premises lead to a ] form of ]. In this sense, it has become a term of abuse in ].
] are intellectually diverse and include arguments that postmodernism promotes ], is meaningless, and that it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge.


== Overview == == Definitions ==
"Postmodernism" is "a highly contested term",{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} referring to "a particularly unstable concept",{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=11}} that "names many different kinds of cultural objects and phenomena in many different ways".{{sfn|Connor|2013|p=567}} It may be described simply as a general mood or '']''.{{sfn|Spencer|2011|p=217}}{{efn|A sampling from other scholars: It is "diffuse, fragmentary, multi-dimensional".{{sfn|Herwitz|2008|loc=Historical and Conceptual Overview}} Critics have described it as "an exasperating term"{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=3}} and claim that its indefinability is "a truism".{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=Introduction}} Put otherwise, postmodernism is "several things at once".{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=3}} It has no single definition, and the term does not name any single unified phenomenon, but rather many diverse phenomena: "postmodernisms rather than one postmodernism".{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=204}}{{sfn|Vanhoozer|2003|p=3}}{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=17}}}}
Postmodernism is an intellectual stance or mode of discourse<ref>Nuyen, A.T., 1992. The Role of Rhetorical Devices in Postmodernist Discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric, pp.183-194.</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Torfing | first = Jacob | title = New theories of discourse : Laclau, Mouffe, and Z̆iz̆ek | publisher = Blackwell Publishers | location = Oxford, UK Malden, Mass | year = 1999 | isbn = 0631195572 }}</ref> defined by an attitude of ] toward what it describes as the ] and ] of modernism, as well as opposition to ] certainty and the stability of ].<ref name="SEP-2015"/> It questions or criticizes viewpoints associated with ] dating back to the 17th century,<ref name="britannica"/> and is characterized by ], ], and its rejection of the "universal validity" of ]s, stable ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=postmodernism&submit.x=48&submit.y=25 |work= American Heritage Dictionary |title= postmodernism |last= |first= |date= 2019 |via= AHDictionary.com |publisher= Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt |access-date= 5 May 2019 |quote= Of or relating to an intellectual stance often marked by eclecticism and irony and tending to reject the universal validity of such principles as hierarchy, binary opposition, categorization, and stable identity. |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180615004714/https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=postmodernism |archive-date= 15 June 2018 |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Bauman | first = Zygmunt | title = Intimations of postmodernity | url = https://archive.org/details/intimationspostm00baum | url-access = limited | page = | publisher = Routledge | location = London New York | year = 1992 | isbn = 9780415067508 }}</ref> Postmodernism is associated with ] and a focus on ] in the maintenance of economic and political power.<ref name="britannica"/> Postmodernists are generally "skeptical of explanations which claim to be valid for all groups, cultures, traditions, or races," and describe truth as relative.<ref name= "faithandreason"/> It can be described as a reaction against attempts to explain reality in an objective manner by claiming that reality is a mental construct.<ref name= "faithandreason">{{Cite web |url= https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/postm-body.html |title= Postmodernism Glossary| work= Faith and Reason |date=11 September 1998 |via=PBS.org |access-date=2019-06-10}}</ref> Access to an ] or to objectively rational knowledge is rejected on the grounds that all interpretations are contingent on when they are made;<ref>{{cite book |author1=Ian Bryant |author2=Rennie Johnston |author3=Robin Usher |title=Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge: Learning Beyond the Limits |date=2004 |publisher=Routledge |page=203}}</ref> as such, claims to objective fact are dismissed as "naive ]."<ref name="britannica"/>


Although postmodernisms are generally united in their effort to transcend the perceived limits of modernism, "modernism" also means different things to different critics in various arts.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=4–5}} Further, there are outliers on even this basic stance; for instance, literary critic ] conceives postmodernism, not in period terms, but in terms of a certain kind of literary imagination so that pre-modern texts such as ]' '']'' or ]' '']'' count as postmodern.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=46}}
Postmodern thinkers frequently describe ] claims and ]s as ] or ], describing them as products of political, historical, or cultural ]s and hierarchies.<ref name="britannica"/> Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to ], ] and ], ], and irreverence.<ref name="britannica"/> Postmodernism is often associated with schools of thought such as ] and ].<ref name="britannica"/> Postmodernism relies on ], which considers the effects of ideology, society, and history on culture.<ref>{{cite book | last = Kellner | first = Douglas | title = Media culture : cultural studies, identity, and politics between the modern and the postmodern | publisher = Routledge | location = London / New York | year = 1995 | isbn = 0415105692 }}</ref> Postmodernism and critical theory commonly criticize ] ideas of ], ], ], ], ], language, and ].<ref name="britannica">{{cite web|last1=Duignan|first1=Brian|title=Postmodernism| website=].com |url= https://www.britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy|access-date=24 April 2016}}</ref>


According to scholar ], "Postmodernism is the ] of critical concepts. It's definitionally overloaded, and it can do almost any job you need done."<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Menand |first=Louis |date=Feb 15, 2009 |title=Saved from Drowning |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/02/23/saved-from-drowning |url-status=live |access-date=Nov 5, 2024 |magazine=] |quote=This is partly because, like many terms that begin with “post,” it is fundamentally ambidextrous. Postmodernism can mean, “We’re all modernists now. Modernism has won.” Or it can mean, “No one can be a modernist anymore. Modernism is over.”}}</ref> From an opposing perspective, media theorist ] criticized the vagueness of the term, enumerating a long list of otherwise unrelated concepts that people have designated as postmodernism, from "the décor of a room" or "a 'scratch' video", to fear of nuclear armageddon and the "implosion of meaning", and stated that anything that could signify all of those things was "a buzzword".<ref name="Hebdige">{{cite book |first=Dick |last=Hebdige |chapter=Postmodernism and "the other side" |title=Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A reader |editor-first=John |editor-last=Storey |location=London |publisher=] |date=2006}}</ref>
Initially, postmodernism was a mode of discourse on literature and literary criticism, commenting on the nature of literary text, meaning, author and reader, writing, and reading.<ref>{{cite book | last = Lyotard | first = Jean-François | title = The Lyotard reader | publisher = Blackwell | location = Oxford, UK / Cambridge, Massachusetts| year = 1989 | isbn = 0631163395 }}</ref> Postmodernism developed in the mid- to late-twentieth century across ], ], ], and ] as a departure or rejection of modernism.<ref name=Oxford>{{cite web |url= http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/postmodernism |title=postmodernism | work= Oxford Dictionary (American English)| via= oxforddictionaries.com}}</ref><ref name= Mura2012>{{cite journal|last=Mura |first=Andrea |year=2012 |title=The Symbolic Function of Transmodernity |journal=Language and Psychoanalysis |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages= 68–87 |url= https://www.language-and-psychoanalysis.com/Mura%202012.pdf |doi= 10.7565/landp.2012.0005 |url-status= dead |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20151008211951/http://www.language-and-psychoanalysis.com/Mura%202012.pdf |archivedate=8 October 2015}}</ref><ref name=Mura2012/><ref>{{cite dictionary |url=http://www.bartleby.com/61/26/P0472600.html |dictionary=The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language |edition=4th |date=2000 |title=postmodern |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081209075319/http://www.bartleby.com/61/26/P0472600.html |archive-date=9 December 2008 |via=Bartleby.com}}</ref> Postmodernist approaches have been adopted in a variety of academic and theoretical disciplines, including ],<ref>{{cite book | last = Hutcheon | first = Linda | title = The politics of postmodernism | publisher = Routledge | location = London New York | year = 2002 | isbn = 9780203426050 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite book | last = Hatch | first = Mary | title = Organization theory : modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = Oxford| year = 2013 | isbn = 978-0199640379 }}</ref> ], ], ], linguistics, ], ], and ], as well as ] in fields such as ] and music. As a critical practice, postmodernism employs concepts such as ], ], ], and ], and rejects abstract principles in favor of direct experience.<ref name= "faithandreason"/>


All this notwithstanding, scholar Hans Bertens offers the following:
] are intellectually diverse, and include arguments that postmodernism promotes ], is meaningless, and adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge.<ref>{{cite book | last = Hicks | first = Stephen | title = Explaining postmodernism : skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault | publisher = Ockham's Razor Publishing | location = Roscoe, Illinois | year = 2011 | isbn = 978-0983258407 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Brown | first = Callum | title = Postmodernism for historians | publisher = Routledge | location = London | year = 2013 | isbn = 9781315836102 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |jstor = 681680|title = Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Critique of Postmodernism|journal = American Anthropologist|volume = 96|issue = 2|pages = 397–415|last1 = Bruner|first1 = Edward M.|year = 1994|doi = 10.1525/aa.1994.96.2.02a00070|url = http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d1cd/4b9f32b1bf020eb847c93dcc91cf8bd2194e.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Callinicos | first = Alex | title = Against postmodernism : a marxist critique | publisher = Polity Press | location = Cambridge | year = 1989 | isbn = 0745606148 }}</ref> Some philosophers, beginning with the pragmatist philosopher ], say that postmodernism contradicts itself through self-reference, as their critique would be impossible without the concepts and methods that modern reason provides.<ref name="SEP-2015"/> Various authors have criticized postmodernism, or trends under the general postmodern umbrella, as abandoning ] rationalism or scientific rigor.<ref>{{cite book | last = Devigne | first = Robert | title = Recasting conservatism : Oakeshott, Strauss, and the response to postmodernism | chapter = Introduction | publisher = Yale University Press | location = New Haven, Connecticut| year = 1994 | isbn = 0300068689 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Sokal | first = Alan | first2 = Jean | last2 = Bricmont | authorlink1 = Alan Sokal | authorlink2 = Jean Bricmont | title = Intellectual impostures : postmodern philosophers' abuse of science | publisher = Profile | location = London | year = 1999 | isbn = 1861971249 }}</ref>


<blockquote>If there is a common denominator to all these postmodernisms, it is that of a crisis in representation: a deeply felt loss of faith in our ability to represent the real, in the widest sense. No matter whether they are aesthestic , epistemological, moral, or political in nature, the representations that we used to rely on can no longer be taken for granted.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=10}}
==Origins of term==
</blockquote>In practical terms, postmodernisms share an attitude<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Brown |first=Stephen |date=2006 |title=Recycling Postmodern Marketing |url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2016131 |journal=The Marketing Review |volume=6 |issue=3 |pages=214 |quote=in certain respects the most straightforward of grasping the postmodern is to eschew the idea that it is an ‘it’. ... Postmodernism, rather, is better regarded as an attitude, a feeling, a mood, a sensibility, an orientation, a way of looking at the world – a way of looking askance at the world. |via=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jin |first=Huimin |date=Sep 2023 |title=Postmodernism in the 21st Century Pros and Cons |url=https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/publications/4m90f310d |journal=Journal of East-West Thought |volume=13 |issue=3 |pages=19 |quote=hen we talk about what postmodernism is, we are not talking about any individual theorist titled postmodern, but those common characteristics he or she shares with a community of similarly titled theorists. In this sense, postmodernism is not peculiar to any individual theorist but refers to a trend of thought, a climate, and an atmosphere to which none is immune,. |via=ScholarWorks}}</ref> of skepticism towards grand explanations and established ways of doing things. In art, literature, and architecture, this attitude blurs boundaries between styles and genres, and encourages freely mixing elements, challenging traditional distinctions like ] versus ].<ref>{{Cite book |url=http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191872112.001.0001/acref-9780191872112 |title=The Concise Oxford Companion to American Literature |date=2020 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-187211-2 |editor-last=Hart |editor-first=James D. |edition=2 |language=en |chapter=postmodernism |doi=10.1093/acref/9780191872112.001.0001 |editor-last2=Martin |editor-first2=Wendy |editor-last3=Hinrichs |editor-first3=Danielle}}</ref> In science, it emphasizes multiple ways of seeing things, and how our cultural and personal backgrounds shape how we see the world, making it impossible to be completely ].<ref>{{Citation |last=Heise |first=Ursula K. |title=Science, technology, and postmodernism |date=2004 |work=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism |pages=136–167 |editor-last=Connor |editor-first=Steven |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-postmodernism/science-technology-and-postmodernism/7DB89463B7564CFED387E95223F365A0 |access-date=2024-11-13 |series=Cambridge Companions to Literature |place=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/ccol0521640520.008 |isbn=978-0-521-64052-7 |quote=These critiques do not form a homogeneous body of argument. They differ substantially and sometimes contradict one another .. Nevertheless, certain basic lines of reasoning recur frequently enough ... that they can convey the conceptual backbone of many postmodernist critiques of science.}}</ref> In philosophy, education, history, politics, and many other fields, it encourages critical re-examination of established institutions and social norms, embracing diversity and breaking down disciplinary boundaries.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gantt|2024|ps=&nbsp;"Rather than a clearly defined system of thought, fixed body of ideas, or unified movement and set of agreed-upon critical methods and techniques, however, postmodernism is perhaps 'best understood as a state of mind, a critical, self-referential posture, and style, a different way of seeking and working.' Indeed, a persistent rejection of scientific methodologies, moral understandings, universal truth, and reductive rationalistic explanation is a hallmark of the postmodern response to ... scientistic aspirations of Enlightenment modernism."}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Ermarth |first=Elizabeth Deeds |title=Postmodernism |date=2016 |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/postmodernism/v-1 |access-date=2024-10-07 |edition=1 |place=London |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9780415249126-n044-1 |isbn=978-0-415-25069-6 |quote=Although diverse and eclectic, postmodernism can be recognized by two key assumptions: first, the assumption that there is no common denominator – in ‘nature’ or ‘truth’ or ‘God’ or ‘time’ – that guarantees either the One-ness of the world or the possibility of neutral, objective thought; second, the assumption that all human systems operate like language as self-reflexive rather than referential systems, in other words systems of differential function that are powerful but finite, and that construct and maintain meaning and value.}}</ref> Though these ideas weren't strictly new, postmodernism amplified them, using an often playful, at times deeply critical, attitude of pervasive skepticism to turn them into defining features.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Klages |first=Mary |date=Dec 6, 2001 |title=Postmodernism |url=https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~sflores/KlagesPostmodernism.html |access-date=Oct 15, 2024 |website=] |quote=Postmodernism, like modernism boundaries between high and low forms of art, rejecting rigid genre distinctions, emphasizing pastiche, parody, bricolage, irony, and playfulness. Postmodern art (and thought) favors reflexivity and self-consciousness, fragmentation and discontinuity (especially in narrative structures), ambiguity, simultaneity, and an emphasis on the destructured, decentered, dehumanized subject. But--while postmodernism seems very much like modernism in these ways, it differs from modernism in its attitude toward a lot of these trends. ... Modernism, for example, tends to present a fragmented view of human subjectivity and history ... as something tragic, something to be lamented and mourned as a loss. ... Postmodernism, in contrast, doesn't lament the idea of fragmentation, provisionality, or incoherence, but rather celebrates that. The world is meaningless? Let's not pretend that art can make meaning then, let's just play with nonsense.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=McGrath |first=Alister E. |title=A passion for truth: the intellectual coherence of evangelicalism |publisher=Apollos |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-85111-447-7 |edition=1. publ |location=Leicester |pages=184 |quote=Postmodernism is generally taken to be something of a cultural sensibility without absolutes, fixed certainties or foundations, which takes delight in pluralism and divergence, and which aims to think through the radical ‘situatedness’ of all human thought}}</ref>
{{original research section|date=February 2018}}
The term ''postmodern'' was first used in 1870.<ref>{{Cite book | doi=10.1075/chlel.xi.07wel |chapter = Postmodernity as a Philosophical Concept|title = International Postmodernism|series = Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages|volume=XI|year = 1997|last1 = Welsch|first1 = Wolfgang|last2 = Sandbothe|first2 = Mike|isbn = 978-90-272-3443-8|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n_Eqx2Gr1vUC&pg=PA76|p=76}}</ref> John Watkins Chapman suggested "a Postmodern style of painting" as a way to depart from French ].<ref>], ''The Postmodern Turn, Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture'', Ohio University Press, 1987. p. 12ff.</ref> J. M. Thompson, in his 1914 article in '']'' (a quarterly philosophical review), used it to describe changes in attitudes and beliefs in the critique of ], writing: "The raison d'être of Post-Modernism is to escape from the double-mindedness of ] by being thorough in its criticism by extending it to religion as well as ], to Catholic feeling as well as to Catholic tradition."<ref>Thompson, J. M. "Post-Modernism," '']''. Vol XII No. 4, July 1914. p. 733</ref>


== Historical overview ==
In 1942 H. R. Hays described postmodernism as a new literary form.<ref name="dorsey">Dorsey, Arris and Collier, Readale. ''Origins of Sociological Theory'', Edtech Press, 2018. {{ISBN|978-1788823791}}</ref><!-- This is not the original Hays source, just someone quoting it. --><ref name="dorsey" />
Two broad cultural movements, modernism and postmodernism, emerged in response to profound changes in the Western world. The ], ], ], ], two ]s, and ] deeply disrupted the social order. Modernism emerged in the late 1800s, seeking to redefine fundamental truths and values through a radical rethinking of traditional ideas and forms across many fields. Postmodernism emerged in the mid-20th century with a skeptical perspective that questioned the notion of universal truths and reshaped modernist approaches by embracing the complexity and contradictions of modern life.<ref>{{harvnb|Best|Kellner|1991|p=}}: "Aesthetic modernity emerged in the new avant-garde modernist movements and bohemian subcultures, which rebelled against the alienating aspects of industrialization and rationalization, while seeking to transform culture and to find creative self-realization in art. Modernity entered everyday life through the dissemination of modern art, the products of consumer society, new technologies, and new modes of transportation and communication. The dynamics by which modernity produced a new industrial and colonial world can be described as ‘modernization’ - a term denoting those processes of individualization, secularization, industrialization, cultural differentiation, commodification, urbanization, bureaucratization, and rationalization which together have constituted the modern world.", p. 2</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=A Dictionary of Sociology |publisher=] |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-19-968358-1 |editor-last=Scott |editor-first=John |edition=4. |series=Oxford Reference |location=Oxford |quote=Postmodernity, in whatever guise it appears, thus implies the disintegration of modernist symbolic orders. It denies the existence of all ‘universals’, including the philosophy of the transcendental self, on the grounds that the discourse and referential categories of modernity (the subject, community, the state, use-value, social class, and so forth) are no longer appropriate to the description of disorganized capitalism.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Gambino |first=Megan |date=Sep 22, 2011 |title=Ask an Expert: What is the Difference Between Modern and Postmodern Art? |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/ask-an-expert-what-is-the-difference-between-modern-and-postmodern-art-87883230/ |access-date=Nov 19, 2024 |website=] |quote=“I have heard all kinds of theories,” says Ho. “I think the truth is that modernity didn’t happen at a particular date. It was this gradual transformation that happened over a couple hundred of years.” Of course, the two times that, for practical reasons, dates need to be set are when teaching art history courses and organizing museums. In Ho’s experience, modern art typically starts around the 1860s, while the postmodern period takes root at the end of the 1950s.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Herman |first=David J. |date=1991 |title=Modernism versus Postmodernism: Towards an Analytic Distinction |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1772982 |journal=Poetics Today |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=55–86 |doi=10.2307/1772982 |issn=0333-5372 |jstor=1772982 |quote=Thus one and the same set of evaluative criteria allows commentators to specify in two contradictory ways the relation that modernism bears to postmodernism. On the basis of these criteria modernism can be seen, under different conditions of observation, either as (1) the genuinely emancipatory cultural movement to which postmodernism is but a parasitical and reactionary successor, or as (2) a germ of liberation whose outworn husk it took the radical energies of postmodernism to strip away at last.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gaither |first=Gloria |date=2006 |title=John Steinbeck: The Postmodern Mind in the Modern Age |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/218346 |journal=Steinbeck Review |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=53–68 |doi=10.1353/str.2007.0006 |issn=1938-6214 |quote=In real life experience Modern individualism, autonomy and personal freedom had too often produced isolation, loneliness, estrangement, and the disintegration of community. The science that was to free humanity from vulnerability to nature and solve medical, societal, and governmental problems was beginning to be questioned as a savior, as pollution, toxin-generated illness, and stress-induced diseases began to emerge as threats. At present the disillusionment with the Modern promise has blossomed into a recognizable era with some identifiable (though not easily definable) sensibilities commonly known as postmodern.}}</ref>


The term "postmodernism" first appeared in print in 1870,{{sfn|Welsch|Sandbothe|1997|page=76}}{{sfn|Hassan|1987|pages=12ff}} but it only began to enter circulation with its current range of meanings in the 1950s—60s.{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=202}}{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=4}}
In 1926, ], president of St. Stephen's College (now ]), published ''Postmodernism and Other Essays'', marking the first use of the term to describe the historical period following Modernity.<ref>''Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary'', 2004</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Postmodernism: A Bibliography |last=Madsen |first=Deborah |publisher=Rodopi |year=1995 |isbn= |location=Amsterdam; Atlanta, Georgia |pages=}}</ref> The essay criticizes the lingering socio-cultural norms, attitudes, and practices of the ]. It also forecasts the major cultural shifts toward Postmodernity and (being an ] priest) suggests orthodox religion as a solution.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Postmodernism and Other Essays|last=Bell|first=Bernard Iddings|publisher=Morehouse Publishing Company|year=1926|isbn=|location=Milwaukie|pages=}}</ref> However, the term postmodernity was first used as a general theory for a historical movement in 1939 by ]: "Our own Post-Modern Age has been inaugurated by the general war of 1914–1918".<ref>Arnold J. Toynbee, , Oxford University Press, 1961 , p. 43.</ref>
] (1982), by architect Michael Graves, an example of ]]]
In 1949 the term was used to describe a dissatisfaction with ] and led to the ] movement <ref>'']'', 2004</ref> in response to the modernist architectural movement known as the ]. Postmodernism in architecture was initially marked by a re-emergence of surface ornament, reference to surrounding buildings in urban settings, historical reference in decorative forms (]), and non-orthogonal angles.<ref>Seah, Isaac. .</ref>


=== Early appearances ===
Author ] suggested the transformation into a post-modern world happened between 1937 and 1957 and described it as a "nameless era" characterized as a shift to a conceptual world based on pattern, purpose, and process rather than a mechanical cause. This shift was outlined by four new realities: the emergence of an Educated Society, the importance of ], the decline of the nation-state, and the collapse of the viability of non-Western cultures.<ref name=LoT>{{cite book|last1=Drucker|first1=Peter F.| authorlink=Peter Drucker |title=Landmarks of Tomorrow|date=1957|publisher=Harper Brothers|location=New York|url=http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/30294/XX_CNE-LIPSOR_1197.pdf.txt?sequence=3|accessdate=2 August 2015}}</ref>


The term "postmodern" was first used in 1870 by the artist John Watkins Chapman, who described "a Postmodern style of painting" as a departure from French ].{{sfn|Welsch|Sandbothe|1997|page=76}}{{sfn|Hassan|1987|pages=12ff.}} Similarly, the first citation given by the '']'' is dated to 1916, describing ] as "one of the few 'post' modern painters whose style is convincing".<ref>{{cite web |title=postmodern (adjective & noun) |website=Oxford English Dictionary |url=https://www.oed.com/dictionary/postmodern_adj?tab=factsheet |access-date=9 February 2024 |date=2006}}</ref>
In 1971, in a lecture delivered at the Institute of Contemporary Art, London, ] described "post-modernism" in art as having started with ], "who first rejected sense-data and the singular point-of-view as the basis for his art, and treated art as a critical investigation."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Bochner|first1=Mel|authorlink=Mel Bochner| title=Solar System & Rest Rooms: Writings and Interviews 1965--2007|date=2008|publisher=The MIT Press|location=USA|isbn=9780262026314|page=91}}</ref>


] priest and cultural commentator J. M. Thompson, in a 1914 article, uses the term to describe changes in attitudes and beliefs in the critique of religion, writing, "the ''raison d'être'' of Post-Modernism is to escape from the double-mindedness of ] by being thorough in its criticism by extending it to religion as well as theology, to ] feeling as well as to Catholic tradition".{{sfn|Thompson|1914|page=733}} In 1926, ], president of ] and also an Episcopal priest, published ''Postmodernism and Other Essays'', which marks the first use of the term to describe an historical period following modernity.<ref>{{cite book |title=Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary |date=2004}}</ref>{{sfn|Madsen|1995}} The essay criticizes lingering socio-cultural norms, attitudes, and practices of the ]. It is also critical of a purported cultural shift away from traditional Christian beliefs.{{sfn|Bell|1926}}{{sfn|Birzer|2015}}{{sfn|Russello|2007}}
In 1996, ] described postmodernism as belonging to one of four typological world views which he identifies as:


The term "postmodernity" was first used in an academic historical context as a general concept for a movement by ] in a 1939 essay, which states that "Our own Post-Modern Age has been inaugurated by the general war of 1914–1918".{{sfn|Toynbee|1961|page=43}}
(a) Postmodern-ironist, which sees truth as socially constructed.


In 1942, the literary critic and author H. R. Hays describes postmodernism as a new literary form.<ref>{{cite web |title=postmodernism (n.) |website=OED |url=https://www.oed.com/dictionary/postmodernism_n |access-date=8 February 2024 |date=2006}}</ref> Also in the arts, the term was first used in 1949 to describe a dissatisfaction with the ] known as the ].{{sfn|Connor|2013|p=567}}
(b) Scientific-rational, in which truth is defined through methodical, disciplined inquiry.


Although these early uses anticipate some of the concerns of the debate in the second part of the 20th century, there is little direct continuity in the discussion.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=19}} Just when the new discussion begins, however, is also a matter of dispute. Various authors place its beginnings in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=203}}
(c) Social-traditional, in which truth is found in the heritage of American and Western civilization.


===Theoretical development===
(d) Neo-Romantic, in which truth is found through attaining harmony with nature or spiritual exploration of the inner self.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Fontana Postmodernism Reader|author=Walter Truett Anderson|year=1996}}</ref>
In the mid-1970s, the American sociologist ] provided a general account of the postmodern as an effectively ] response to modernism's alleged assault on the ] and its rejection of what he upheld as traditional values.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=30}} The ideals of modernity, per his diagnosis, were degraded to the level of consumer choice.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=5}} This research project, however, was not taken up in a significant way by others until the mid-1980s when the work of ] and ], building upon art and literary criticism, reintroduced the term to sociology.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=201}}


Discussion about the postmodern in the second part of the 20th century was most articulate in areas with a large body of critical discourse around the ]. Even here, however, there continued to be disagreement about such basic issues as whether postmodernism is a break with modernism, a renewal and intensification of modernism,{{sfn|Connor|2013|p=567}} or even, both at once, a rejection and a radicalization of its historical predecessor.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=4–5}}
==History==
The basic features of what is now called postmodernism can be found as early as the 1940s, most notably in the work of artists such as ].<ref>See Barth, John: "]." ''The Atlantic Monthly'', August 1967, pp. 29-34.</ref> However, most scholars today agree postmodernism began to compete with modernism in the late 1950s and gained ascendancy over it in the 1960s.<ref>Cf., for example, Huyssen, Andreas: ''After the Great Divide. Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism''. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986, p. 188.</ref> Since then, postmodernism has been a powerful, though not undisputed, force in art, literature, film, music, drama, architecture, history, and ].{{citation needed|date=September 2018}}


While discussions in the 1970s were dominated by literary criticism, these were supplanted by architectural theory in the 1980s.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=12}} Some of these conversations made use of French poststructuralist thought, but only after these innovations and critical discourse in the arts did postmodernism emerge as a philosophical term in its own right.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=Introduction & §2}}{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}
The primary features of postmodernism typically include the ironic play with styles, citations and narrative levels,<ref>See Hutcheon, Linda: ''A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction''. New York: Routledge, 1988, pp. 3-21</ref><ref>See McHale, Brian: ''Postmodern Fiction'', London: Methuen, 1987.</ref> a metaphysical skepticism or ] towards a "]" of Western culture,<ref>See Lyotard, Jean-François, ''The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge'', Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press 1984</ref> and a preference for the ] at the expense of ] (or more accurately, a fundamental questioning of what 'the real' constitutes).<ref>See Baudrillard, Jean: "]s." In: ''Jean Baudrillard. Selected Writings''. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1988, pp. 166-184.</ref>


====In literary and architectural theory====
Since the late 1990s, there has been a growing sentiment in popular culture and in academia that postmodernism "has gone out of fashion".<ref>Potter, Garry and Lopez, Jose (eds.): ''After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism''. London: The Athlone Press 2001, p. 4.</ref> Others argue that postmodernism is dead in the context of current cultural production.<ref>{{Cite journal |title = Toward a Concept of Post-Postmodernism or Lady Gaga's Reconfigurations of Madonna|journal = Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture|volume = 12|issue = 4|year = 2013|last2 = Engberg|first2 = Maria|last1 = Fjellestad|first1 = Danuta|url=http://reconstruction.eserver.org/124/Fjellestad-Engberg.shtml|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130223103043/http://reconstruction.eserver.org/124/Fjellestad-Engberg.shtml|archive-date = 23 February 2013}} DiVA .</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | url=https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond |title = The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond|journal = Philosophy Now|volume = 58|pages = 34–37|year = 2006|last1 = Kirby|first1 = Alan}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/postmodernism-dead-comes-next/ |title=Postmodernism is dead. What comes next? |website=TLS |language=en-GB |access-date=2020-02-17|first=Alison |last=Gibbons|date=2017}}</ref> Some of the characteristic features of postmodernist arguments have reemerged in the second decade of the 21st century in the form of ], albeit with rather different emphases (e.g. environmental "climate change", speciesism, robotics/AI, and other techological concerns). Posthumanists tend to use rhetorical devices and approaches to argumentation that resemble those pioneered by postmodernists, although more preoccupied with the human relatioship to nature and technology than power within human relations.
]
According to Hans Bertens and ], the ] ] and ] first introduced the term "postmodern" in its current sense during the 1950s.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Anderson |first1=Perry |title=The Origins of Postmodernity |date=1998 |publisher=Verso |pages=6–12}}</ref>{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}
Their stance against modernist poetry – and Olson's ] orientation – were influential in the identification of postmodernism as a polemical position opposed to the ] values championed by the ] project.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=19}}


During the 1960s, this affirmative use gave way to a pejorative use by the ], who used it to describe a waning commitment among youth to the political ideals ] and ].{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} The literary critic ], for instance, denounced postmodern literature for being content to merely reflect, rather than actively attempt to refashion, what he saw as the "increasingly shapeless" character of contemporary society.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=21}}{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}
==Theories and derivatives==


In the 1970s, this changed again, largely under the influence of the literary critic ]'s large-scale survey of works that he said could no longer be called modern. Taking the Black Mountain poets an exemplary instance of the new postmodern type, Hassan celebrates its ] playfulness and cheerfully anarchic spirit, which he sets off against the high seriousness of modernism.{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=24}}
===Structuralism and post-structuralism ===
{{multiple issues|section=yes|
{{more citations needed section|date=September 2012}}
{{original research|date=February 2018}}}}
] was a philosophical movement developed by French academics in the 1950s, partly in response to French ],<ref>{{cite book | last = Kurzweil | first = Edith | title = The age of structuralism : from Lévi-Strauss to Foucault | publisher = Routledge | location = London | year = 2017 | isbn = 9781351305846 }}</ref> and often interpreted in relation to ] and ]. Thinkers who have been called structuralists include the anthropologist ], the linguist ], the Marxist philosopher ], and the semiotician ]. The early writings of the psychoanalyst ] and the literary theorist ] have also been called structuralist. Those who began as structuralists but became post-structuralists include ], ], ], and ]. Other post-structuralists include ], ], ], ], ], and ]. The American cultural theorists, critics and intellectuals whom they influenced include ], ], ], ], and ].


(Yet, from another perspective, ]'s attack on Western philosophy and ]'s critique of metaphysics posed deep theoretical problems not necessarily a cause for aesthetic celebration. Their further influence on the conversation about postmodernism, however, would be largely mediated by French ].{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|pages=22–23}})
Like structuralists, post-structuralists start from the assumption that people's identities, values and economic conditions determine each other rather than having ''intrinsic'' properties that can be understood in isolation.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Lévi-Strauss|first1=Claude|authorlink=Claude Lévi-Strauss| title=Structural Anthropology|date=1963|publisher=New York: Basic Books|location=USA|isbn=046509516X|page=324|edition=I}}<br/>Lévi-Strauss, quoting D'Arcy Westworth Thompson states: "To those who question the possibility of defining the interrelations between entities whose nature is not completely understood, I shall reply with the following comment by a great naturalist: In a very large part of morphology, our essential task lies in the comparison of related forms rather than in the precise definition of each; and the deformation of a complicated figure may be a phenomenon easy of comprehension, though the figure itself has to be left unanalyzed and undefined."<br/></ref> Thus the French structuralists considered themselves to be espousing ] and ]. But they nevertheless tended to explore how the subjects of their study might be described, reductively, as a set of ''essential'' relationships, schematics, or mathematical symbols. (An example is Claude Lévi-Strauss's algebraic formulation of mythological transformation in "The Structural Study of Myth"<ref>Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ''Anthropologie Structurale''. Paris: Éditions Plon, 1958.<br/>Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ''Structural Anthropology''. Trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (New York: Basic Books, 1963), .</ref>).


If literature was at the center of the discussion in the 1970s, architecture was at the center in the 1980s.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=12}} The architectural theorist ], in particular, connected the artistic ] to social change in a way that captured attention outside of academia.{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} Jenckes, much influenced by the American architect ],{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=55}} celebrated a plurality of forms and encourages participation and active engagement with the local context of the built environment.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=59–60}} He presented this as in opposition to the "authoritarian style" of International Modernism.{{sfn|Connor|2013|p=567}}
Postmodernist ideas in ] and in the analysis of ] and ] have expanded the importance of ]. They have been the point of departure for works of ], ] and ], as well as being visible in marketing/business and the interpretation of ], ] and ], starting in the late 20th century. These developments—re-evaluation of the entire Western value system (], ], ], shift from ] to ]) that took place since the 1950s and 1960s, with a peak in the ]—are described with the term "]",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.inst.at/trans/11Nr/luetzeler11.htm|title=TRANS Nr. 11: Paul Michael Lützeler (St. Louis): From Postmodernism to Postcolonialism|work=inst.at}}</ref> as opposed to ''Postmodernism'', a term referring to an opinion or movement.<ref>{{cite book | last = Sarup | first = Madan | title = An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism | publisher = University of Georgia Press | location = Athens | year = 1993 | isbn = 0820315311 }}</ref> Post-structuralism is characterized by new ways of thinking through structuralism, contrary to the original form.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Yilmaz | first1 = K | year = 2010 | title = Postmodernism and its Challenge to the Discipline of History: Implications for History Education | url = | journal = Educational Philosophy & Theory | volume = 42 | issue = 7| pages = 779–795 | doi=10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00525.x}}</ref>


====The influence of poststructuralism====
===Deconstruction===
In the 1970s, postmodern criticism increasingly came to incorporate poststructuralist theory, particularly the ] approach to texts most strongly associated with ], who attempted to demonstrate that the whole ] approach to language and knowledge was untenable and misguided.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|page=21}} It is during this period that postmodernism came to be particularly equated with a kind of anti-representational self-reflexivity.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=70}}{{efn|The incorporation of deconstruction into postmodernism, while common in the U.S., was resisted in the U.K.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=15}} Furthermore, the more general category of poststructuralism itself was a largely American category, foreign to the disparate French thinkers upon whom it was imposed.{{sfn|Poster|1989|p=6}} }}
{{Main|Deconstruction}}
{{multiple issues|section=yes|
{{more citations needed section|date=September 2012}}
{{original research|date=February 2018}}}}
One of the most well-known postmodernist concerns is "deconstruction," a theory for philosophy, literary criticism, and textual analysis developed by ].<ref>{{cite book | last = Culler | first = Jonathan | title = On deconstruction : theory and criticism after structuralism | publisher = Routledge | location = London | year = 2008 | isbn = 9780415461511 }}</ref> Critics have insisted that Derrida's work is rooted in a statement found in ''Of Grammatology'': "Il n'y a pas de hors-texte" (''there is no Outside-text''). Such critics misinterpret the statement as denying any reality outside of books. The statement is actually part of a critique of "inside" and "outside" metaphors when referring to text, and is corollary to the observation that there is no "inside" of a text as well.<ref>Derrida (1967), , pp. 158–59, 163.</ref> This attention to a text's unacknowledged reliance on metaphors and figures embedded within its discourse is characteristic of Derrida's approach. Derrida's method sometimes involves demonstrating that a given philosophical discourse depends on binary oppositions or excluding terms that the discourse itself has declared to be irrelevant or inapplicable. Derrida's philosophy inspired a postmodern movement called ] among architects, characterized by design that rejects structural "centers" and encourages decentralized play among its elements. Derrida discontinued his involvement with the movement after the publication of his collaborative project with architect Peter Eisenman in ''Chora L Works: Jacques Derrida and Peter Eisenman''.<ref> Peeters, Benoît. ''Derrida: A Biography'', pp. 377–8, translated by Andrew Brown, ], 2013, {{ISBN|9780745656151}}</ref>


In the 1980s, some critics began to take an interest in the work of ]. This introduced a political concern about social power-relations into discussions about postmodernism.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=7,79}} This was also the beginning of the affiliation of postmodernism with ] and ].{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=8,70}} The art critic ], in particular, not only made the connection to feminism explicit, but went so far as to claim feminism for postmodernism wholesale,{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=92}} a broad claim resisted by even many sympathetic feminists such as ] and Linda Nicholson.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=190–96}}
===Post-postmodernism===
{{multiple issues|section=yes|
{{more citations needed section|date=September 2012}}
{{original research|date=February 2018}}}}
The connection between postmodernism, posthumanism, and cyborgism has led to a challenge to postmodernism, for which the terms "postpostmodernism" and "postpoststructuralism" were first coined in 2003:<ref>{{Cite journal |jstor = 1577323|title = Decon<sup>2</sup> (Decon Squared): Deconstructing Decontamination|journal = Leonardo|volume = 36|issue = 4|pages = 285–290|last1 = Mann|first1 = Steve|year = 2003|doi = 10.1162/002409403322258691|url=http://wearcam.org/decon2/decon_leonardo_leon_36_4_285_0.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1386/eme.5.4.279_1 | title=Postcyborg Ethics: A New Way to Speak of Technology| journal=Explorations in Media Ecology| volume=5| issue=4| pages=279–296| year=2006| last1=Campbell| first1=Heidi A.|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274327317}}</ref>
{{quote|In some sense, we may regard postmodernism, posthumanism, poststructuralism, etc., as being of the 'cyborg age' of mind over body. Deconference was an exploration in post-cyborgism (i.e. what comes after the postcorporeal era), and thus explored issues of postpostmodernism, postpoststructuralism, and the like. To understand this transition from 'pomo' (cyborgism) to 'popo' (postcyborgism) we must first understand the cyborg era itself.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.24908/ss.v1i3.3346 | title=PanopDecon: Deconstructing, decontaminating, and decontextualizing panopticism in the postcyborg era| journal=Surveillance & Society| volume=1| issue=3| pages=375–398| year=2002| last1=Mann| first1=Steve| last2=Fung| first2=James| last3=Federman| first3=Mark| last4=Baccanico| first4=Gianluca|doi-access=free}}</ref>}}


====Generalization====
More recently ], post-postmodernism and the "death of postmodernism" have been widely debated: in 2007 Andrew Hoberek noted in his introduction to a special issue of the journal ''Twentieth Century Literature'' titled "After Postmodernism" that "declarations of postmodernism's demise have become a critical commonplace". A small group of critics has put forth a range of theories that aim to describe culture or society in the alleged aftermath of postmodernism, most notably Raoul Eshelman (performatism), ] (]), ] (]), and Alan Kirby (digimodernism, formerly called pseudo-modernism). None of these new theories or labels have so far gained very widespread acceptance. Sociocultural anthropologist Nina Müller-Schwarze offers neostructuralism as a possible direction.<ref>Müller Schwarze, Nina
Although postmodern criticism and thought drew on philosophical ideas from early on, "postmodernism" was only introduced to the expressly philosophical lexicon by ] in his 1979{{efn|English translation, 1984.}} '']''. This work served as a catalyst for many of the subsequent intellectual debates around the term.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=Introduction & §2}}{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}
2015 The Blood of Victoriano Lorenzo: An Ethnography of the Cholos of Northern Coclé Province. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland Press.</ref> The exhibition ''Postmodernism – Style and Subversion 1970–1990'' at the ] (], 24 September 2011 – 15 January 2012) was billed as the first show to document postmodernism as a historical movement.


By the 1990s, postmodernism had become increasingly identified with critical and philosophical discourse directly about postmodernity or the postmodern idiom itself.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=4}} No longer centered on any particular art or even the arts in general, it instead turned to address the more general problems posed to society in general by a new proliferation of cultures and forms.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=12}} It is during this period that it also came to be associated with ] and ].{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=5}}
==Philosophy==
{{Main|Postmodern philosophy}}
{{Multiple issues|section=yes|
{{original research section|date=February 2018}}
{{primary sources |reason=We need to rely on books *about*, not *by* these writers. |date=May 2019}}
}}


Around this time, postmodernism also began to be conceived in popular culture as a general "philosophical disposition" associated with a loose sort of ]. In this sense, the term also started to appear as a "casual term of abuse" in non-academic contexts.{{sfn|Connor|2004|p=5}} Others identified it as an aesthetic "lifestyle" of eclecticism and playful self-irony.{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=203}}
In the 1970s a group of ] in France developed a radical critique of modern philosophy with roots discernible in Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, and Heidegger, and became known as postmodern theorists, notably including Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Jean-François Lyotard, Jean Baudrillard, and others. New and challenging modes of thought and writing pushed the development of new areas and topics in philosophy. By the 1980s, this spread to America (Richard Rorty) and the world.<ref name="Best-Kellner-2001">{{cite web |title=The Postmodern Turn in Philosophy: Theoretical Provocations and Normative Deficits |last1=Best |first1=Steven |last2=Kellner |first2=Douglas |author2-link=Douglas Kellner |url=https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/postmodernturn.htm |date=2001-11-02 |website=UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies |publisher=UCLA |archiveurl= |archivedate= |accessdate=2019-05-12 |quote= }}</ref>


== In the arts ==
===Jacques Derrida===
{{See also|Postmodern art}}
{{Main|Jacques Derrida}}
]
Jacques Derrida was a French philosopher best known for developing a form of ] analysis known as ], which he discussed in numerous texts, and developed in the context of ].<ref name=EB-2018-Derrida>{{cite web |author=The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jacques-Derrida |date=Oct 11, 2018 |publisher=] |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |title=Jacques Derrida |access-date=14 May 2019}}</ref><ref name="McCance-2014">{{cite book |last=McCance |first=Dawne |title=Derrida on Religion: Thinker of Differance |url=https://books.google.com/?id=WZPCBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 |series=Key thinkers in the study of religion |date=5 December 2014 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=978-1-317-49093-7 |page=7 |oclc=960024707 |orig-year=2009: Equinox}}</ref><ref name="Peters-2009">{{cite book |title=Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Politics of Pedagogy |last1=Peters |first1=Michael A. |last2=Biesta |first2=Gert |url=https://books.google.com/?id=EhpwEYmMxgYC&pg=PA134 |year=2009 |publisher=Peter Lang |location=New York |isbn=978-1-4331-0009-3 |page=134 |oclc=314727596<!--476972726, 263497930, 783449163--> |accessdate= }}</ref> He is one of the major figures associated with ] and ].<ref name="Bensmaia05">{{Cite book | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bREQibN9i-sC&pg=PA92 |title = The Columbia History of Twentieth-Century French Thought|isbn = 9780231107907|editor-last1 = Kritzman|editor-first1 = Lawrence D.|editor-last2 = Reilly|editor-first2 = Brian J.|editor-last3 = Debevoise|editor-first3 = M. B.|year = 2006|last=Bensmaïa|first= Réda|chapter=Poststructuralism| pp= 92–93|publisher=Columbia University Press|location=New York}}</ref><ref name="Poster89">{{Cite book | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EumYDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 | title=Critical Theory and Poststructuralism: In Search of a Context| isbn=9781501746185| last1=Poster| first1=Mark| date=1989|publisher=Cornell University Press|pp=4–6|chapter=Introduction: Theory and the Problem of Context}}</ref><ref name="Leitch-1996">{{cite book |last=Leitch |first=Vincent B. |title=Postmodernism - Local Effects, Global Flows |url=https://books.google.com/?id=YfCczsG6ZDQC&pg=PA27 |series=SUNY series in postmodern culture |date=1 January 1996 |publisher=SUNY Press |location=Albany, NY |isbn=978-1-4384-1044-9 |page=27 |oclc=715808589 |accessdate=15 May 2019}}</ref>
Postmodernism encompasses a wide range of artistic movements and styles. In visual arts, ], ], ], ], ], and ] are among the approaches recognized as postmodern.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jenkins |first=Sarah |date=Jan 25, 2015 |title=Postmodern Art |url=https://www.theartstory.org/definition/postmodernism/ |access-date=Oct 23, 2024 |website=The Art Story |quote=The reaction took on multiple artistic forms for the next four decades, including Conceptual art, Minimalism, Video art, Performance art, Institutional Critique, and Identity Art. These movements are diverse and disparate but connected by certain characteristics: ironical and playful treatment of a fragmented subject, the breakdown of high and low culture hierarchies, undermining of concepts of authenticity and originality, and an emphasis on image and spectacle.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Postmodernism |url=https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/p/postmodernism |access-date=Oct 23, 2024 |website=] |quote=As an art movement postmodernism to some extent defies definition – as there is no one postmodern style or theory on which it is hinged. It embraces many different approaches to art making, and may be said to begin with pop art in the 1960s and to embrace much of what followed including conceptual art, neo-expressionism, feminist art, and the Young British Artists of the 1990s.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=About Contemporary Art |url=https://www.getty.edu/education/teachers/classroom_resources/curricula/contemporary_art/background1.html |access-date=Oct 23, 2024 |website=] |quote=Contemporary artists working within the postmodern movement reject the concept of mainstream art and embrace the notion of "artistic pluralism," the acceptance of a variety of artistic intentions and styles. Whether influenced by or grounded in performance art, pop art, Minimalism, conceptual art, or video, contemporary artists pull from an infinite variety of materials, sources, and styles to create art. For this reason, it is difficult to briefly summarize and accurately reflect the complexity of concepts and materials used by contemporary artists.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Karg |first=Alexandra |date=Aug 27, 2024 |title=What is Postmodern Art? The Genre Defined in 8 Iconic Works |url=https://www.thecollector.com/postmodern-art/ |access-date=Oct 23, 2024 |website=] |quote=It must be emphasized ... that postmodern art cannot be limited to a single style or theory. Many art forms are considered postmodern art. These include Pop Art, Conceptual Art, Neo-Expressionism, Feminist Art, and the art of the Young British Artists in the 1990s.}}</ref> The label extends to diverse musical genres and artists: ], ], and ] all meet postmodern definitions. Literature, film, architecture, theater, fashion, dance, and many other creative disciplines saw postmodern expression. As an example, ]'s pop art across multiple mediums challenged traditional distinctions between high and low culture, and blurred the lines between fine art and commercial design. His work, exemplified by the iconic '']'' series during the 1960s, brought the postmodernist sensibility to mainstream attention.<ref name=":14">{{Cite magazine |last=Acocella |first=Joan |date=June 1, 2020 |title=Untangling Andy Warhol |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/06/08/untangling-andy-warhol |access-date=April 1, 2024 |magazine=The New Yorker |language=en-US |issn=0028-792X |quote=There was no huger reputation than Warhol's in the art of the sixties, and in late-twentieth-century art there was no more important decade than the sixties. Much of the art that has followed, in the United States, is unthinkable without him (...)}}</ref><ref name=":13">{{Cite news |last=Metcalf |first=Stephen |date=December 6, 2018 |title=Andy Warhol, Cold and Mute, Is the Perfect Artist for Our Times |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/01/andy-warhol-pop-art-whitney/576412/ |access-date=April 1, 2024 |work=The Atlantic |language=en |issn=2151-9463 |quote=He's now widely regarded as the most important artist of the second half of the 20th century.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Andy Warhol |url=https://www.theartstory.org/artist/warhol-andy/ |access-date=Oct 26, 2024 |website=The Art Story}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Miller |first=Brenna |date=Nov 2012 |title=Andy Warhol's Campbell's Soup Cans, 1962 |url=http://origins.osu.edu/milestones/november-2012-andy-warhol-s-campbell-s-soup-cans-1962 |access-date=Oct 25, 2024 |website=Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective, ] |quote=In the 50 years since they first went on display, Andy Warhol’s 32 Campbell’s Soup Cans have become a canonical symbol of American Pop Art.}}</ref>


Criticism of postmodernist movements in the arts include objections to departure from beauty, the reliance on language for the art to have meaning, a lack of coherence or comprehensibility, deviation from clear structure, and consistent use of dark and negative themes.<ref name="paglia">{{cite web|url=http://www.ipod.org.uk/reality/art_bollocks.asp |title=Art Bollocks |publisher=Ipod.org.uk |date=1990-05-05 |archive-date=January 31, 2015 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150131083911/http://www.ipod.org.uk/reality/art_bollocks.asp }}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=de Castro |first=Eliana |date=12 December 2015 |title=Camille Paglia: "Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart" |url=https://faustomag.com/camille-paglia-postmodernism-is-a-plague-upon-the-mind-and-the-heart/ |magazine=FAUSTO - Filosofia, Cultura e Literatura Clássica |quote=Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart. }}</ref>
Derrida re-examined the fundamentals of writing and its consequences on philosophy in general; sought to undermine the language of "presence" or ] in an analytical technique which, beginning as a point of departure from Heidegger's notion of ], came to be known as ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=LURCZA|first=Zsuzsanna|date=2017|title=Deconstruction of the Destruktion – Heidegger and Derrida|journal=Philobiblon. Transylvanian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Humanities|volume=22|issue=2|doi=10.26424/philobib.2017.22.2.11|issn=1224-7448}}</ref>


===Michel Foucault=== === Architecture ===
] (1982) by ], considered the first built example of postmodern architecture in a tall building<ref name="trib-nov20112">{{cite news |date=November 17, 2011 |title=Portland Building gets a place on national history list |url=http://portlandtribune.com/component/content/article?id=15793 |access-date=July 6, 2013 |newspaper=]}}</ref> and "a seminal Postmodern work"<ref name="D-GravesDies2">{{cite journal |author=Marcus Fairs |date=March 12, 2015 |title=Michael Graves dies aged 80 |url=https://www.dezeen.com/2015/03/12/michael-graves-dies-aged-80/ |journal=Dezeen |access-date=August 23, 2017}}</ref>]]
{{Main|Michel Foucault}}
] near ], PA by alumnus of the Academy architect ] ]]
Michel Foucault was a ], ], ], and ]. First associated with ], Foucault created an oeuvre that today is seen as belonging to ] and to postmodern philosophy. Considered a leading figure of {{interlanguage link|French theory|fr|vertical-align=sup}}, his work remains fruitful in the English-speaking academic world in a large number of sub-disciplines. The ] Guide described him in 2009 as the most cited author in the humanities.<ref name=Times-2009>{{cite web |title=The most cited authors of books in the humanities |url=https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/most-cited-authors-of-books-in-the-humanities-2007/405956.article?storyCode=405956&sectioncode=26 |date=2019 |website=] |publisher=THE World Universities Insights |url-access=registration }}</ref>
{{Main|Postmodern architecture}}


Scholarship regarding postmodernism and architecture is closely linked with the writings of critic-turned-architect ], beginning with lectures in the early 1970s and his essay "The Rise of Post-Modern Architecture" from 1975.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jencks |first=Charles |author-link=Charles Jencks |date=1975 |title=The Rise of Post Modern Architecture |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fdtUAAAAMAAJ&q=The+rise+of+Post-Modern+architecture |journal=Architectural Association Quarterly |volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=3–14 |via=]}}</ref> His ''magnum opus'', however, is the book ''The Language of Post-Modern Architecture'', first published in 1977, and since running to seven editions<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jencks |first=Charles |title=The language of post-modern architecture |publisher=Rizzoli |year=1977 |isbn=0-8478-0167-5 |location=New York}}</ref> (in which he famously wrote: "Modern architecture died in St. Louis, Missouri, on 15 July 1972 at 3:32 p.m. (or thereabouts) when the infamous ] scheme, or rather several of its slab blocks, were given the final coup de grâce by dynamite."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beal |first=Justin |date=2022 |title=What is/was Post-Modern (or Never Take the Marble for Granite) |url=https://www.jencksfoundation.org/explore/text/what-is-was-post-modern-or-never-take-the-marble-for-granite#77c4d4167e90 |access-date=Oct 6, 2024 |website=Jencks Foundation}}</ref>).
Michel Foucault introduced concepts such as ']', or re-invoked those of older philosophers like ']' and ']' in order to explain the relationship between meaning, power, and social behavior within social orders (see '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'').<ref>{{Cite book|last=Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984.|title=The order of things : an archaeology of the human sciences|date=17 April 2018|isbn=978-1-317-33667-9|oclc=1051836299}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Foucault|first=Michel|date=2013-04-15|title=Archaeology of Knowledge|doi=10.4324/9780203604168|isbn=9780203604168}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=FOUCAULT, MICHEL.|title=DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH : the birth of the prison.|date=2020|publisher=PENGUIN BOOKS|isbn=978-0-241-38601-9|oclc=1117463412}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984, author.|title=The History of Sexuality : an introduction.|isbn=978-1-4114-7321-8|oclc=910324749}}</ref>


Jencks makes the point that postmodernism (like modernism) varies for each field of art, and that for architecture it is not just a reaction to modernism but what he terms ''double coding'': "Double Coding: the combination of Modern techniques with something else (usually traditional building) in order for architecture to communicate with the public and a concerned minority, usually other architects."<ref>{{cite book |last=Jencks |first=Charles |author-link=Charles Jencks |title=The Language of Post-Modern Architecture |publisher=Academy Editions |location=London |date=1974}}</ref>
===Jean-François Lyotard===
{{Main|Jean-François Lyotard}}
Jean-François Lyotard is credited with being the first to use the term in a philosophical context, in his 1979 work '']''. In it, he follows Wittgenstein's ] model and ], contrasting two different language games, that of the expert, and that of the philosopher. He talks about transformation of knowledge into information in the computer age, and likens the transmission or reception of coded messages (information) to a position within a language game.<ref name="SEP-2015">{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last1=Zalta |editor-first1=Edward N. |title=Postmodernism |last1=Aylesworth |first1=Gary |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/postmodernism |date=February 5, 2015 |orig-year=1st pub. 2005 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |location= |edition=Spring 2015 |series=sep-postmodernism |volume= |pages= |access-date=2019-05-12 |quote= }}</ref>


In their book, "Revisiting Postmodernism", ] and Adam Furman argue that postmodernism brought a more joyous and sensual experience to the culture, particularly in architecture.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Farrell |first=Terry |title=Revisiting Postmodernism |publisher=] |year=2017 |isbn=978-1-85946-632-2 |location=Newcastle upon Tyne}}</ref> For instance, in response to the modernist slogan of ] that "less is more", the postmodernist Robert Venturi rejoined that "less is a bore".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Schudel |first=Matt |date=2018-09-28 |title=Remembering Robert Venturi, the US architect who said: 'Less is a bore' |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/robert-venturi-postmodern-architect-less-is-a-bore-a8555936.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221016075701/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/robert-venturi-postmodern-architect-less-is-a-bore-a8555936.html |archive-date=2022-10-16 |access-date=2023-12-24 |website=Independent}}</ref>
Lyotard defined philosophical postmodernism in ''The Postmodern Condition'', writing: "Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity towards meta narratives...."{{thin space}}<ref name=Lyotard-1979>{{Cite book |title=The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge |last=Lyotard |first=J.-F. |authorlink=Jean-François Lyotard |publisher=University of Minnesota Press |year=1979 |isbn=| location=Minneapolis |oclc=232943026 |pages=|title-link=The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge }}</ref> where what he means by ] is something like a unified, complete, universal, and ] story about everything that is. Postmodernists reject metanarratives because they reject the concept of truth that metanarratives presuppose. Postmodernist philosophers in general argue that truth is always contingent on historical and social context rather than being absolute and universal and that truth is always partial and "at issue" rather than being complete and certain.<ref name="SEP-2015" />


===Richard Rorty=== ===Dance===
{{Main|Richard Rorty}} {{main|Postmodern dance}}
The term "postmodern dance" is most strongly associated with the ], located in New York's ] during the 1960s and 1970s. Perhaps its most important principle is taken from the composer ]'s efforts to break down the distinction between art and life,{{sfn|Banes|2008}}<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Guadagnino |first=Kate |date=Mar 20, 2019 |title=The pioneers of postmodern dance, 60 years later |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/t-magazine/postmodern-dance.html |access-date=Oct 19, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> developed in particular by the American dancer and choreographer ], Cage's partner.<ref name=":0" /> The Judson dancers " dance of its theatrical conventions such as virtuoso technique, fanciful costumes, complex storylines, and the traditional stage drew on everyday movements (sitting, walking, kneeling, and other gestures) to create their pieces, often performing them in ordinary spaces."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Custodio |first=Isabel |date=Jan 24, 2019 |title=The Voices of Judson Dance Theater |url=https://www.moma.org/magazine/articles/29 |access-date=Oct 19, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> ]'s San Francisco Dancers' Workshop, established in the 1950s to explore beyond the technical constraints of modern dance, pioneered ideas later developed at Judson;<ref>{{Cite book |title=Moving toward life: five decades of transformational dance |date=1995 |publisher=Wesleyan University Press |isbn=978-0-8195-6286-9 |editor-last=Halprin |editor-first=Anna |location=Hanover, N.H |pages=254 |editor-last2=Kaplan |editor-first2=Rachel}}</ref> Halprin, ], and ] are considered "giants of the field".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kramer |first=Michael J. |date=Jun 30, 2019 |title=The Mind Is a Muscle: Postmodern Dance and Intellectual History |url=https://s-usih.org/2019/06/the-mind-is-a-muscle-postmodern-dance-and-intellectual-history/ |access-date=Dec 7, 2024 |website=Society for U.S. Intellectual History}}</ref>
Richard Rorty argues in '']'' that contemporary ] mistakenly imitates scientific methods. In addition, he denounces the traditional epistemological perspectives of ] and ] that rely upon the independence of knowers and observers from phenomena and the passivity of natural phenomena in relation to consciousness.


The Judson collective included trained dancers, visual artists, filmmakers, writers, and composers, exchanging approaches and critiquing traditional dance,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Banes |first=Sally |date=Nov 9, 2009 |title=Judson Dance Theater |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/display/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-1002083961 |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=] |language=en |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.a2083961}}</ref> with a focus "more on the intellectual process of creating dance than the end result".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Conyers |first=Claude |date=Feb 23, 2011 |title=Postmodern dance |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/display/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-1002092662 |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=] |language=en |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.a2092662}}</ref> The end of the 1970s saw a distancing from this analytical postmodern dance, and a return to the expression of meaning.<ref name=":22">{{cite book |last1=Banes |first1=Sally |title=Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance |date=2011 |publisher=Wesleyan University Press |isbn=978-0-8195-6160-2 |pages=xxiv}} "... by the end of the 1970s, the clarity and simplicity of analytic postmodern dance had served its purpose and threatened to become an exercise in formalism. Dance had become so shorn of meaning (other than reflexive) that for a younger generation of choreographers and spectators it was beginning to be regarded as almost meaningless. The response was to look for ways to reinstall meaning in dance."</ref> In the 1980s and 1990s, dance began to incorporate other typically postmodern features such as the mixing of genres, challenging high–low cultural distinctions, and incorporating a political dimension.{{sfn|Banes|2008}}
===Jean Baudrillard===
{{Main|Jean Baudrillard}}
Jean Baudrillard, in '']'', introduced the concept that reality or the principle of "]" is short-circuited by the interchangeability of signs in an era whose communicative and semantic acts are dominated by electronic media and digital technologies. Baudrillard proposes the notion that, in such a state, where subjects are detached from the outcomes of events (political, literary, artistic, personal, or otherwise), events no longer hold any particular sway on the subject nor have any identifiable context; they therefore have the effect of producing widespread indifference, detachment, and passivity in industrialized populations. He claimed that a constant stream of appearances and references without any direct consequences to viewers or readers could eventually render the division between appearance and object indiscernible, resulting, ironically, in the "disappearance" of mankind in what is, in effect, a virtual or holographic state, composed only of appearances. For Baudrillard, "simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or a reality: a ]."<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1016/0362-3319(91)90018-Y |title = Power and politics in hyperreality: The critical project of Jean Baudrillard|journal = The Social Science Journal|volume = 28|issue = 3|pages = 347–367|year = 1991|last1 = Luke|first1 = Timothy W.}}</ref>


===Fredric Jameson=== === Fashion ===
]
{{Main|Fredric Jameson}}
One manifestation of postmodernism in fashion explored alternatives to conventional concepts of elegance. ]’s Spring/Summer 1997 collection featured "dresses asymmetrically padded with goose down, creating bumps in unexpected areas of the body". ]’s 1985 ] hat "offered an immediate, yet impermanent, ']' fashion experience". ] took "an extremely polyglot approach", from early work with copies of 1950s clothes, to exploration of historic modes and cultural influences: in 1981, her first runway show, "Pirate", merged British history, 18th- and 19th-century dress, and African textile design, with a rap and ethnic music soundtrack.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Deihl |first=Nancy |date=Jul 2, 2009 |title=Post-modernism in fashion |url=https://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/display/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7002082725 |access-date=Oct 14, 2024 |website=] |language=en |doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t2082725|isbn=978-1-884446-05-4 }}</ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite web |last1=Deihl |first1=Nancy |date=2009 |title=Westwood , Vivienne |url=https://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/display/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7002081175 |access-date=2024-03-17 |website=Grove Art Online |language=en |doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t2081175 |isbn=978-1-884446-05-4}}</ref>
Fredric Jameson set forth one of the first expansive theoretical treatments of postmodernism as a historical period, intellectual trend, and social phenomenon in a series of lectures at the ], later expanded as ''Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism'' (1991).<ref>{{cite book | last = Jameson | first = Fredric | title = Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism | publisher = Duke University Press | location = Durham | year = 1991 | isbn = 0822309297 }}</ref>


Fashion design through the 1950s focused on catering to the upper class, emphasizing elegance, epitomized by French '']''. The 1960s saw a dramatic shift, first inspired by the pop art movement; "throwaway" dresses made of paper came to be high fashion.<ref name=":6" /> ], called "the master of us all" by ] and "the only couturier in the truest sense of the word" by ],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Schillinger |first=L |title=Opening up the couturier Cristóbal Balenciaga. |publisher=International Herald Tribune |year=2013 |location=Paris}}</ref> abruptly closed his Paris couture house in 1968, saying only, "High fashion is mortally wounded."<ref name=":03">{{Cite web |date=2016-12-09 |title=El hijo de un pescador que se convirtió en el diseñador español más famoso de la historia |url=https://www.revistavanityfair.es/la-revista/articulos/cristobal-balenciaga/23197 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220303141252/https://www.revistavanityfair.es/la-revista/articulos/cristobal-balenciaga/23197 |archive-date=2022-03-03 |access-date=2022-03-03 |website=Vanity Fair España |language=es}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=Apr 11, 2017 |title=1968: The End of True Couture? |url=https://exhibitions.fitnyc.edu/paris-refashioned/1968-the-end-of-true-couture/ |access-date=Dec 6, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> Others adapted to the new role of designer as interpreter of popular attitudes. Fashion editor ] noted, "] has a fifty–fifty deal with the street. Half of the time he is inspired by the street and half of the time the street gets its style from Yves Saint Laurent."<ref name=":6" />
===Douglas Kellner===
{{Main|Douglas Kellner}}
In ''Analysis of the Journey'', a journal birthed from postmodernism, Douglas Kellner insists that the "assumptions and procedures of modern theory" must be forgotten. Extensively, Kellner analyzes the terms of this theory in real-life experiences and examples.{{Citation needed|reason=need at least something as a source, left in as probably accurate|date=May 2019}} Kellner used science and technology studies as a major part of his analysis; he urged that the theory is incomplete without it. The scale was larger than just postmodernism alone; it must be interpreted through cultural studies where science and technology studies play a huge role. The reality of the ] on the United States of America is the catalyst for his explanation. This catalyst is used as a great representation due to the mere fact of the planned ambush and destruction of "symbols of globalization", insinuating the ].{{Citation needed|reason=need at least something as a source, left in as probably accurate|date=May 2019}}


The postmodern fashion sensibility appeared also through the subcultures of the 1960s and 1970s. ]s, ] and other countercultural groups constructed their own nonconformist identities through choices in music, drugs, slang, and appearance. As these styles gained mainstream popularity, they lost their deeper meaning: "the adoption of surface attributes offers the frisson of rebellion without a commitment to a subcultural lifestyle."<ref name=":6" />
{{Clarify|reason=Unclear what exactly is being said here, as if crucial information is omitted.|text=One of the numerous yet appropriate definitions of postmodernism and the qualm aspect aids this attribute to seem perfectly accurate.|date=March 2017}} In response, Kellner continues to examine the repercussions of understanding the effects of the September 11 attacks. He questions if the attacks are only able to be understood in a limited form of postmodern theory due to the level of irony.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1177/107769900107800415| title=''The Postmodern Adventure'' | journal=Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly| volume=78| issue=4| pages=865–866| year=2001|last=Lule|first= Jack }}</ref>


In 2021, the ] couture house reopened;<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mower |first=Sarah |date=July 7, 2021 |title=Balenciaga |url=https://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows/fall-2021-couture/balenciaga |access-date=Dec 6, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> the following year, '']'' magazine noted, "Haute Couture isn’t just surviving — it’s thriving". The observation highlighted how ''haute couture'' caters to the "0.001 per cent", while captivating the public and serving as a marketing mechanism for more commercially viable mass-produced lines.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Seward |first1=Mahoro |last2=Ahmed |first2=Osman |date=July 15, 2022 |title=In 2022, Haute Couture isn't just surviving — it's thriving |url=https://i-d.co/article/haute-couture-aw22-round-up/ |access-date=Dec 6, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> Drawing from many sources, postmodernism eclecticism has been integrated into everyday fashion, as evidenced by ], ], and elevated sportswear.<ref name=":6" />
The conclusion he depicts is simple: postmodernism, as most use it today, will decide what experiences and signs in one's reality will be one's reality as they know it.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Danto | first1 = AC | year = 1990 | title = The Hyper-Intellectual | url = | journal = New Republic | volume = 203 | issue = 11/12| pages = 44–48 }}</ref>


==Manifestations== === Film ===
{{main|Postmodern film}}
===Architecture===
Postmodern film aims to subvert the mainstream ] of ] and ], and to test the audience's ].<ref name="Susan12">{{cite journal |last=Hopkins |first=Susan |date=Spring 1995 |title=Generation Pulp |journal=Youth Studies Australia |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=14–19}}</ref><ref name="Laurent13">{{cite journal |last=Kretzschmar |first=Laurent |date=July 2002 |title=Is Cinema Renewing Itself? |journal=Film-Philosophy |volume=6 |issue=15 |doi=10.3366/film.2002.0015}}</ref><ref name="Linda22">{{cite web |last=Hutcheon |first=Linda |date=January 19, 1998 |title=Irony, Nostalgia, and the Postmodern |url=http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/criticism/hutchinp.html |publisher=University of Toronto English Library}}</ref> Typically, such films also break down the cultural divide between ] and ] ] and often upend typical portrayals of ], ], ], ], and ] with the goal of creating something that does not abide by traditional narrative expression.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Representing Postmodern Marginality in Three Documentary Films. - Free Online Library |url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Representing+Postmodern+Marginality+in+Three+Documentary+Films.-a0204861632 |website=www.thefreelibrary.com}}</ref>
{{Main|Postmodern architecture}}
] (1977-84), Stuttgart, ], by James Stirling and Michael Wilford, showing the eclectic mix of classical architecture and colourful ironic detailing.]]


Certain key characteristics are used to separate the postmodern from modernist cinema and traditional narrative film.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Woods |first=Tim |title=Beginning postmodernism |publisher=] |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-7190-5211-8 |edition=1st |location=Manchester |pages=214–218}}</ref><ref name="archive.org">{{Cite web |last=Betz |first=Mark |date=March 23, 2009 |title=Beyond the subtitle : remapping European art cinema |url=http://archive.org/details/betz_beyond-the-subtitle-remapping-european-art-cinema |publisher=Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press |via=Internet Archive}}</ref> One is an extensive use of ] or ], imitating the style or character of other artistic works. A second is ] or self-reference, highlighting the relation of the image to other images in media and not to any kind of external reality.<ref name=":2" /> Viewers are reminded that the film itself is only a film, perhaps through the use of ], in which the film's characters reference other works of fiction. A third characteristic is stories that ], deconstructing or fragmenting time to emphasize the constructed nature of film. Another common element is a bridging of the gap between ] and ],.<ref name="Laurent13"/><ref name="Linda22"/><ref name=":2" /> ] of all sorts are crucial to postmodernism.<ref name="Laurent13"/><ref name="Mary1">{{cite book |last=Alemany-Galway |first=Mary |title=A Postmodern Cinema |publisher=Scarecrow Press |year=2002 |location=Kent, England}}</ref>
The idea of Postmodernism in ] began as a response to the perceived blandness and failed Utopianism of the Modern movement.{{Citation needed|reason=This is probably correct but needs a source|date=May 2019}} ], as established and developed by ] and ], was focused on:
* the pursuit of a perceived ideal perfection;
* the attempted harmony of form and function;<ref>Sullivan, Louis. "The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered," published Lippincott's Magazine (March 1896).</ref> and,
* the dismissal of "frivolous ornament."<ref>Loos, Adolf (1910). "]".</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Tafuri|first= Manfredo|url=https://modernistarchitecture.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/manfredo-tafuri-architecture-and-utopia-design-and-capitalist-development.pdf |title=Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development|location=Cambridge|publisher= MIT Press|date= 1976|isbn=9780262200332}}</ref>{{pn|date=February 2020}}
They argued for an architecture that represented the spirit of the age as depicted in cutting-edge technology, be it airplanes, cars, ocean liners or even supposedly artless grain silos.<ref>Le Corbusier, ''Towards a New Architecture''. Dover Publications, 1985/1921.</ref>
Modernist ] is associated with the phrase "]".


]'s '']'' (1982) has been widely studied as a prime example of postmodernism. The setting is a future ] where "replicants", enhanced ] workers nearly indistinguishable from humans, are hunted down when they escape from their jobs. The film blurs boundaries between genres and cultures, and fuses disparate styles and periods: futuristic visuals "mingle with drab 1940s clothes and offices, punk rock hairstyles, pop Egyptian styles and oriental culture."<ref name=":2" /><ref name="Laurent13" /> The blending of ] and ] into ] illustrates the deconstruction of both cinema and genre.<ref>{{cite web |last=Sherlock |first=Ben |date=February 21, 2021 |title=One Movie Both Invented and Perfected the Tech Noir |url=https://gamerant.com/80s-movie-invented-tech-noir/ |work=]}}</ref> The film can also be seen as an example of major studios using the "mystique and cachet of the term 'postmodern' as a sales pitch", resulting in ] movies that "demonstrate all the postmodern characteristics".<ref name=":2" /> From another perspective, "critical responses to ''Blade Runner'' fall on either side of a modern/postmodern line" – critical analysis from "modernist" and "postmodernist" approaches produce entirely different interpretations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Begley |first=Varun |date=2004 |title="Blade Runner" and the Postmodern: A Reconsideration |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43797175 |journal=Literature/Film Quarterly |volume=32 |issue=3 |pages=186–192 |jstor=43797175 |issn=0090-4260 |quote=Roughly speaking, critical responses to Blade Runner fall on either side of a modern/postmodern line. Postmodernist accounts diametrically oppose reading strategies dependent on conventional aesthetic notions (narrative, character, structure, reference, metaphor, symbol, etc.) that collectively we might term modernist. These two approaches entail radically different positions on the nature and function of interpretation.}}</ref>
Critics of Modernism have:
* argued that the attributes of perfection and minimalism are themselves subjective;
* pointed out ]s in modern thought; and,
* questioned the benefits of its philosophy.<ref>Venturi, et al.</ref>{{fcn|date=February 2020}}


=== Graphic design ===
The intellectual scholarship regarding postmodernism and architecture is closely linked with the writings of critic-turned-architect ], beginning with lectures in the early 1970s and his essay "The Rise of Post Modern Architecture" from 1975.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Jencks|first= Charles|title=The Rise of Post Modern Architecture|journal=Architectural Association Quarterly|url=https://books.google.com/?id=fdtUAAAAMAAJ&q=The+rise+of+Post-Modern+architecture|volume=7|issue=4| date=1975|pp=3–14}}</ref> His ''magnum opus'', however, is the book ''The Language of Post-Modern Architecture'', first published in 1977, and since running to seven editions.<ref>{{cite book | last = Jencks | first = Charles | title = The language of post-modern architecture | publisher = Rizzoli | location = New York | year = 1977 | isbn = 0847801675 }}</ref> Jencks makes the point that Post-Modernism (like Modernism) varies for each field of art, and that for architecture it is not just a reaction to Modernism but what he terms ''double coding'': "Double Coding: the combination of Modern techniques with something else (usually traditional building) in order for architecture to communicate with the public and a concerned minority, usually other architects."<ref>Jencks, Charles. "The Language of Post-Modern Architecture", Academy Editions, London 1974.</ref> In their book, "Revisiting Postmodernism", ] and Adam Furman argue that postmodernism brought a more joyous and sensual experience to the culture, particularly in architecture.<ref>{{cite book | last = Farrell | first = Terry | title = Revisiting Postmodernism | publisher = RIBA Publishing | location = Newcastle upon Tyne | year = 2017 | isbn = 9781859466322 }}</ref>
Early mention of postmodernism in ] appeared in the British magazine, ''Design'', during the late 1960s.{{Sfn|Poynor|2003|p=18}} The discussion took a pragmatic if not entirely comfortable view of graphic design as engaging with the economic necessities of a changing world. Graphic design had the role of "active stylization of product surfaces (such as those of packaging and promotion)", engaging without moralizing with consumer desires. Close involvement with the ] process, and the potential need for strong visual identities from the "new giant corporations" and "internationalization", were examined. Editor Corin Hughes-Stanton concluded, "Post-Modernism' is an attitude that takes the form of a creative response to unfolding developments in the socio-economic sphere; it is a sign of active engagement rather than an academic retreat from its commercial and professional concerns."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Moszkowicz |first=J. |date=2013-11-01 |title=Re-Learning Postmodernism in the History of Graphic Design: A (Con)Textual Analysis of Design Journal in the Late 1960s |url=https://academic.oup.com/jdh/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jdh/ept003 |journal=Journal of Design History |language=en |volume=26 |issue=4 |pages=381–400 |doi=10.1093/jdh/ept003 |issn=0952-4649}}</ref>


In the 1970s, the American ] began to reject the modernism of the ] and incorporate postmodern ideas through post-structuralist theory.<ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last1=Lupton |first1=Ellen |last2=McCoy |first2=Katherine |date=Spring 1991 |title=The academy of deconstructed design |url=https://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/the-academy-of-deconstructed-design |access-date=Dec 12, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> By the 1980s, Cranbrook was considered to be at the forefront of design in the US.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Woodham |first=Jonathan M. |title=A dictionary of modern design |date=2004 |publisher=New York : Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-280097-8 |location=Oxford |chapter=Cranbrook Academy of Art}}</ref> Mid-decade, the work of ] and ]'s ''The Anti-Aesthetic'' ] took hold at the school. Co-director of design ] explained that, rather than applying specific theories to particular projects, Cranbrook was broadly drawing from the literature circulating within the art and architecture fields.<ref name=":7" />
===Art===
{{Main|Postmodern art}}
Postmodern art is a body of art movements that sought to contradict some aspects of modernism or some aspects that emerged or developed in its aftermath. Cultural production manifesting as intermedia, installation art, conceptual art, deconstructionist display, and multimedia, particularly involving video, are described as postmodern.<ref>{{cite book | last = Lee | first = Pamela | title = New Games : Postmodernism After Contemporary Art | publisher = Routledge | location = New York | year = 2013 | isbn = 9780415988797 }}</ref>


Writing in 2003 in ''No More Rules: Graphic Design and Postmodernism'', ] stated that, in the preceding 15 years, graphic designers had produced "some of the most challenging examples of postmodernism in the visual arts", yet this work had largely been overlooked by commentators in ]. And, while some graphic designers, predominantly American, would claim the label, many associated with postmodernism "would reject the term vehemently". Regarding intellectual motivation, "graphic design as a profession has long had an aversion to theory and many of the key postmodernist texts are highly demanding, even for those who possess a basic sympathy for their arguments."{{Sfn|Poynor|2003|p=10}}
===Graphic design===
]]]
Early mention of postmodernism as an element of graphic design appeared in the British magazine, "Design."<ref>{{cite book | last = Poynor | first = Rick | title = No more rules : graphic design and postmodernism | page = | publisher = Yale University Press | location = New Haven, CT | year = 2003 | isbn = 0300100345 | url = https://archive.org/details/nomorerulesgraph00poyn_0/page/18 }}</ref> A characteristic of postmodern graphic design is that "retro, techno, punk, grunge, beach, parody, and pastiche were all conspicuous trends. Each had its own sites and venues, detractors and advocates."<ref>{{Cite book|title = Graphic Design History|last = Drucker|first = Johanna and ]|publisher = Pearson|year = 2008|isbn = 978-0132410755|location = |pages = 305–306}}</ref>


In a broad historical context, ''Graphic Design History: A Critical Guide'' (2008) situates postmodernism in a chronology of ] from prehistoric times to the digital age. "Retro, techno, punk, grunge, beach, parody, and pastiche were all conspicuous trends", each with its own "sites and venues, detractors and advocates." A shared attitude went beyond surface style to "raise profound questions about knowledge, history and power."<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Drucker |first1=Johanna |last2=McVarish |first2=Emily |author2-link=Emily McVarish |title=Graphic Design History |publisher=Pearson |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-13-241075-5 |pages=305–306}}</ref>
===Literature===

], winner of the 2006 ]]]
=== Literature ===
{{Main|Postmodern literature}} {{Main|Postmodern literature}}
In 1971, the American literary theorist ] made "postmodernism" popular in literary studies with his influential book, ''The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature''. According to scholar David Herwitz, American writers such as ] (who had controversially declared that the novel was "exhausted" as a genre), ], and ] responded in various ways to the stylistic innovations of '']'' and the late work of ]. Postmodern literature often calls attention to issues regarding its own complicated connection to reality. The postmodern novel plays with language, twisted plots, multiple narrators, and unresolved endings, unsettling the conventional idea of the novel as faithfully reflecting the world.{{sfn|Herwitz|2008|loc=History of Postmodernism}}


In ''Postmodernist Fiction'' (1987), ] details the shift from modernism to postmodernism, arguing that postmodern works developed out of modernism, moving from concern with what is there ("] dominant") to concern with how we can know it's there ("] dominant").<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Brian McHale |last=McHale |first=B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ec2HAgAAQBAJ |title=Postmodernist Fiction |location=] |publisher=] |date=2003 |isbn=1134949162 |via=]}}</ref> McHale's "What Was Postmodernism?" (2007)<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McHale |first=Brian |date=20 December 2007 |title=What Was Postmodernism? |url=https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/what-was-postmodernism/ |access-date=4 April 2013 |journal=Electronic Book Review }}</ref> follows ]'s lead in now using the past tense when discussing postmodernism. Others argue that postmodernism in literature utilizes compositional and semantic practices such as inclusivity, intentional indiscrimination, nonselection, and "logical impossibility."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Narrative Skepticism: Moral Agency and Representations of Consciousness in Fiction|publisher= Fairleigh Dickinson University Press|page=7|author=Linda Schermer Raphael}}</ref>
]' (1939) short story '']'', is often considered as predicting postmodernism<ref>Elizabeth Bellalouna, Michael L. LaBlanc, Ira Mark Milne (2000) p.50</ref> and is a paragon of the ultimate ].<ref name="Stavans1997p31">{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/?id=Ro6a1EyaS2AC&pg=PA31 |title = Antiheroes: Mexico and Its Detective Novel|isbn = 9780838636442|last1 = Stavans|first1 = Ilan|year = 1997|p=31|publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson University Press}}</ref> ] is also considered an important precursor and influence. Novelists who are commonly connected with postmodern literature include ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]<ref>{{Cite book | doi=10.1017/CCOL9780521769747.010 |chapter = Pynchon's postmodernism|title = The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Pynchon|pages = 97–111|year = 2011|last1 = McHale|first1 = Brian|isbn = 9780521769747|editor1-last = Dalsgaard|editor1-first = Inger H|editor2-last = Herman|editor2-first = Luc|editor3-last = McHale|editor3-first = Brian}}</ref> (Pynchon's work has also been described as "]"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://people.bu.edu/rcarney/aboutrc/letters32.shtml |title=Mail, Events, Screenings, News: 32 |website=People.bu.edu |date= |accessdate=2013-04-04}}</ref>), ], ], ], ] and ].


=== Music ===
In 1971, the Arab-American scholar ] published ''The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature,'' an early work of literary criticism from a postmodern perspective that traces the development of what he calls "literature of silence" through ], ], ], ], and many others, including developments such as the ] and the ].
]]]
{{Main|Postmodern music|Postmodern classical music|Art pop}}


Postmodern influence extends across all areas of music; its accessibility to a general audience requires an understanding of references, irony and pastiche that varies widely between artists and their works.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web |last=Pasler |first=Jann |date=Jan 20, 2001 |title=Postmodernism |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/display/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000040721 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=] |language=en |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.40721}}</ref> In ], ], ] and ] have been singled out by critics and scholars as postmodern icons. The belief that ] – serious, classical music – holds higher cultural and technical value than ] and popular traditions, lost influence under postmodern analysis, as musical hybrids and crossovers attracted scholarly attention.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last=Alper |first=Garth |date=Dec 2000 |title=Making sense out of postmodern music? |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03007760008591782 |journal=Popular Music and Society |language=en |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=1–14 |doi=10.1080/03007760008591782 |issn=0300-7766}}</ref>
In ''Postmodernist Fiction'' (1987), ] details the shift from modernism to postmodernism, arguing that the former is characterized by an epistemological dominant and that postmodern works have developed out of modernism and are primarily concerned with questions of ontology.<ref>], (]: ], 2003).</ref> McHale's second book, ''Constructing Postmodernism'' (1992), provides readings of postmodern fiction and some contemporary writers who go under the label of ]. McHale's "What Was Postmodernism?" (2007)<ref>{{cite web|url= https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/what-was-postmodernism/ |title=What Was Postmodernism? |publisher=Electronic Book Review |date=2007-12-20 |accessdate=2013-04-04|first=Brian |last=McHale}}</ref> follows ]'s lead in now using the past tense when discussing postmodernism.


Across musical traditions, postmodernism can be identified through several core characteristics: genre mixing; irony, humor, and self-parody: "surface" exploration with less concern for formal structure than in modernist approaches; and a return to tonality.<ref name=":9" /> This represents a loss of authority of the Eurocentric perspective on music and the rise of ] as influenced by postmodern values. Composers took different routes: some returned to traditional modes over experimentation, others challenged the authority of dominant musical structures, others intermingled disparate sources.<ref name=":8" />
===Music===
]]]
{{Main|Postmodern music|Postmodern classical music|Art pop}}


Jonathan Kramer has written that avant-garde musical compositions (which some would consider modernist rather than postmodernist) "defy more than seduce the listener, and they extend by potentially unsettling means the very idea of what music is."<ref>{{cite book | last = Kramer | first = Jonathan | title = Postmodern music, postmodern listening | publisher = Bloomsbury Academic | location = New York | year = 2016 | isbn = 978-1501306020 }}</ref> The postmodern impulse in classical music arose in the 1960s with the advent of musical ]. Composers such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] reacted to the perceived elitism and dissonant sound of atonal academic modernism by producing music with simple textures and relatively consonant harmonies, whilst others, most notably ] challenged the prevailing ]s of beauty and objectivity common to Modernism. The composer ] has written that avant-garde musical compositions (which some would consider modernist rather than postmodernist) "defy more than seduce the listener, and they extend by potentially unsettling means the very idea of what music is."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kramer |first=Jonathan |title=Postmodern music, postmodern listening |publisher=] |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-5013-0602-0 |location=New York |pages=45}}</ref> In the 1960s, composers such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] reacted to the perceived elitism and dissonant sound of atonal academic modernism by producing music with simple textures and relatively consonant harmonies,{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} whilst others, most notably ] challenged the prevailing narratives of beauty and objectivity common to modernism.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Williams |first=Alastair |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-john-cage/52F3631719F4EBFBA9133AC011F4618A |title=The Cambridge Companion to John Cage |date=2002 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-521-78968-4 |editor-last=Nicholls |editor-first=David |series=Cambridge Companions to Music |location=Cambridge |pages=231-232 |chapter=Cage and postmodernism |doi=10.1017/ccol9780521783484 |quote=What distinguishes Cage’s aesthetics from high modernist aesthetics in general is its acceptance of the contingency of structure ... aesthetic meanings are negotiable and far from immutable ... we do not need to look for art, for it is all around us: we only need to throw off a (European) aesthetic mantle, open our ears, and we will hear music.}}</ref>


In 2023, music critic Andy Cush described Talking Heads as "New York art-punks" whose "blend of nervy postmodernism and undeniable groove made them one of the defining rock bands of the late 1970s and ’80s."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cush |first=Andy |date=Sep 21, 2023 |title=Talking Heads' Original Lineup on Stop Making Sense, Their Early Days, and the Future |url=https://pitchfork.com/features/interview/talking-heads-reunion-2023-stop-making-sense/ |access-date=Sep 25, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> ] ], examining the "]" music video in 1989, said the group "draw eclectically on a wide range of visual and aural sources to create a distinctive pastiche or hybrid 'house style' which they have used since their formation in the mid-1970s deliberately to stretch received (industrial) definitions of what rock/pop/video/Art/ performance/audience are", calling them "a properly postmodernist band."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mitchell |first=Tony |date=Oct 1989 |title=Performance and the Postmodern in Pop Music |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3208181 |journal=Theatre Journal |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=284 |doi=10.2307/3208181|jstor=3208181 }}</ref> According to lead vocalist/guitarist/songwriter ], commenting in 2011, "Anything could be mixed and matched – or ], as is said today – and anything was fair game for inspiration.”<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jensen |first=Emily |date=July 27, 2022 |title=How Virgil Abloh Defined Postmodern Fashion |url=https://jingdaily.com/posts/virgil-abloh-off-white-louis-vuitton-postmodern-fashion |access-date=Sep 25, 2024 |website=Jing Daily}}</ref>
Author on postmodernism, Dominic Strinati, has noted, it is also important "to include in this category the so-called ']' musical innovations and mixing of styles associated with groups like ], and performers like ], together with the self-conscious 'reinvention of ]' by the ]".<ref>{{Cite book|title=An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture|last=Strinati|first=Dominic |publisher=Routledge |year=1995 |isbn=|location=London|pages=234|quote=|via=}}</ref>


Avant-garde academics labelled American singer Madonna a "personification of the postmodern" and created a sub-discipline of ] known as ].<ref name="Brown2003">{{cite web |last=Brown |first=Stephen |year=2003 |title=On Madonna'S Brand Ambition: Presentation Transcript |url=https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/11267/volumes/e06/E-06 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170419105437/https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/11267/volumes/e06/E-06 |archive-date=19 April 2017 |access-date=1 April 2021 |publisher=Association For Consumer Research |pages=119–201 |volume=6}}</ref> Her self-aware constructs of gender and identity, and classic film references in music videos for “]” (1984) and “]" (1989), made her a favorite of cultural theorists, who saw her as "enacting postmodernist models of subjectivity."<ref>{{Cite web |last=McClary |first=Susan |date=Nov 26, 2013 |title=Madonna |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/display/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000046456 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=Grove Music Online |language=en |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.46456|isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 }}</ref> Madonna was seen to embody fragmentation, pastiche, retrospection, anti-foundationalism and de-differentiation; her "subversion of the subversion of the subversion of the ]" in the "Material Girl' video was analyzed.<ref name="Brown2003" /> Outside academia, ] ] said she is "perhaps the most visible example of what is called post-modernism"; novelist ] described her as "perhaps the most postmodern personage on the planet".<ref name="McGregor">{{cite news |last=McGregor |first=Jock |year=2008 |title=Madonna: Icon of Postmodernity |url=https://labri.org/england/resources/05052008/JM01_Madonna.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101207061754/https://labri.org/england/resources/05052008/JM01_Madonna.pdf |archive-date=7 December 2010 |access-date=29 March 2021 |publisher=] |pages=1–8}}</ref>
===Urban planning===
Modernism sought to design and plan cities which followed the logic of the new model of industrial ]; reverting to large-scale solutions, aesthetic standardisation and ] design solutions.<ref name=":0" /> Modernism eroded urban living by its failure to recognise differences and aim towards homogeneous landscapes (Simonsen 1990, 57). ]' 1961 book '']''<ref>{{cite book | last = Jacobs | first = Jane | title = The death and life of great American cities | publisher = Modern Library | location = New York | year = 1993 | isbn = 0679644334 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/deathlifeofgreat0000jaco }}</ref> was a sustained critique of urban planning as it had developed within Modernism and marked a transition from modernity to postmodernity in thinking about urban planning (Irving 1993, 479).


=== Sculpture ===
The transition from Modernism to Postmodernism is often said to have happened at 3:32pm on 15 July in 1972, when ]; a housing development for low-income people in ] designed by ] ], which had been a prize-winning version of ]'s 'machine for modern living' was deemed uninhabitable and was torn down (Irving 1993, 480). Since then, Postmodernism has involved theories that embrace and aim to create diversity. It exalts uncertainty, flexibility and change (Hatuka & D'Hooghe 2007) and rejects utopianism while embracing a utopian way of thinking and acting.<ref name=Hatuka2007>{{Cite journal | url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7b3789rv |title = After Postmodernism: Readdressing the Role of Utopia in Urban Design and Planning|journal = Places|volume = 19|issue = 2|date = 2007|last2 = d'Hooghe|first2 = Alexander|last1 = Hatuka|first1 = Tali|pp=20–27}}</ref> Postmodernity of 'resistance' seeks to deconstruct Modernism and is a critique of the origins without necessarily returning to them (Irving 1993, 60). As a result of Postmodernism, planners are much less inclined to lay a firm or steady claim to there being one single 'right way' of engaging in urban planning and are more open to different styles and ideas of 'how to plan' (Irving 474).<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |jstor = 40112887|title = Planning and the Modern/Postmodern Debate|journal = The Town Planning Review|volume = 61|issue = 2|pages = 119–137|last1 = Goodchild|first1 = Barry|year = 1990|doi = 10.3828/tpr.61.2.q5863289k1353533}}</ref><ref name=Hatuka2007/><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.3138/utq.62.4.474 |title = The Modern/Postmodern Divide and Urban Planning|journal = University of Toronto Quarterly|volume = 62|issue = 4|pages = 474–487|year = 1993|last1 = Irving|first1 = Allan}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |jstor = 4200779|title = Planning on 'Postmodern' Conditions|journal = Acta Sociologica|volume = 33|issue = 1|pages = 51–62|last1 = Simonsen|first1 = Kirsten|year = 1990|doi = 10.1177/000169939003300104}}</ref>
]}}</ref>]]
Sculptor ], at the forefront of the ] movement, declared in 1961: "I am for an art that is political-erotical-mystical … I am for an art that embroils itself with everyday crap and still comes out on top."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Caroline A. |date=2003 |title=Post-modernism |url=https://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/display/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000069002 |access-date=2024-10-15 |website=Grove Art Online |language=en |doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t069002|isbn=978-1-884446-05-4 }}</ref> That year, he opened ''The Store'' in a ] area of ], where he blurred the line between art and commerce by producing and selling brightly painted plaster replicas of hamburgers and cans of soda, dresses, underwear, and other everyday objects: "Museum in b concept equals store in mine".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Giant Three-Way Plug (Cube Tap) |url=https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/312790 |access-date=Oct 14, 2024 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Anapur |first=Eli |date=Oct 3, 2023 |title=Revisiting Claes Oldenburg's The Store - The Slippery Line Between Art and Commodity |url=https://www.widewalls.ch/magazine/claes-oldenburg-the-store |access-date=Oct 14, 2024 |website=Widewalls}}</ref> Oldenburg was one of the most recognizable sculptors identified with postmodernism, a group that included ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}


=== Theater ===
The study of postmodern urbanism itself, i.e. the postmodern way of creating and perpetuating the urban form, and the postmodern approach to understanding the city was pioneered in the 1980s by what could be called the "Los Angeles School of Geography" centered on the ]'s Urban Planning Department in the 1980s, where contemporary Los Angeles was taken to be the postmodern city par excellence, contraposed to what had been the dominant ideas of the ] formed in the 1920s at the ], with its framework of "urban ecology" and its emphasis on functional areas of use within a city and the "concentric circles" to understand the sorting of different population groups.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=Ok3rAgAAQBAJ|title=My Los Angeles: From Urban Restructuring to Regional Urbanization|last=Soja|first=Edward W.|date=2014-03-14|publisher=Univ of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-95763-3|language=en}}</ref> ] of the Los Angeles School combined Marxist and postmodern perspectives and focused on the economic and social changes (globalization, specialization, industrialization/deindustrialization, Neo-Liberalism, mass migration) that lead to the creation of large city-regions with their patchwork of population groups and economic uses<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mediapolisjournal.com/2017/10/edward-soja/|title=Edward Soja|last=Shiel|first=Mark|date=2017-10-30|website=Mediapolis|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-01}}</ref>
{{Main article|Postmodern theatre}}
Postmodern theater emerged as a reaction against modernist theater. Most postmodern productions are centered on highlighting the fallibility of definite truth, instead encouraging the audience to reach their own individual understanding. Essentially, thus, postmodern theater raises questions rather than attempting to supply answers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}


==Criticisms== == In philosophy ==
{{Main|Criticism of postmodernism}} {{Main|Postmodern philosophy}}
{{See also|Criticism of postmodernism}}
Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, including the argument that postmodernism is meaningless and promotes ].


=== Poststructuralist precursors ===
In part in reference to post-modernism, conservative English philosopher ] wrote, "A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is 'merely relative,' is asking you not to believe him. So don't."<ref>{{cite book | last = Scruton | first = Roger |author-link=Roger Scruton | title = Modern philosophy : an introduction and survey | publisher = Penguin Books | location = New York | year = 1996 | isbn = 0140249079 }}</ref> Similarly, ] criticized the vagueness of the term, enumerating a long list of otherwise unrelated concepts that people have designated as "postmodernism", from "the décor of a room" or "a 'scratch' video", to fear of nuclear armageddon and the "implosion of meaning", and stated that anything that could signify all of those things was "a buzzword".<ref name="Hebdige">Dick Hebdige, 'Postmodernism and "the other side"', in ''Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A reader'', edited by John Storey, London, Pearson Education, 2006</ref>
{{Main|Poststructuralism}}
In the 1970s, a disparate group of French theorists – often grouped together as "poststructuralists" – developed a critique of modern philosophy with roots discernible in ] and ]'s critique of ].{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=22}} Although few themselves relied upon the term, they became known to many as postmodern theorists.{{sfn|Bernstein|1992|page=11}} Poststructuralism is sometimes treated as distinct from or a subcategory of postmodernism and sometimes is treated as having been subsumed by postmodernism.{{efn|For instance, contrast {{harvnb|Poster|1989|p=4}} with {{harvnb|Sim|2011b|pages=ix–x}}.}} While their ideas exerted a great influence on debates about the postmodern, the French poststucturalists themselves did not intervene or attempt to provide their own definitions of the postmodern.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=31}}


Poststructuralists, like ], start from the assumption that people's identities, values, and economic conditions determine each other as parts of a common whole, rather than having intrinsic properties that can be understood in isolation.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=18}} While structuralism explores how meaning is produced by a set of essential relationships in an overarching quasi-linguistic system, poststructuralism accepts this premise, but rejects the assumption that such systems can ever be fixed or centered.{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=205}} Instead, poststructuralists stress the various ways that cultural structures are produced in history.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=20}} They also emphasize how meaning is generated, rather than discovered, and they replace the traditional concept of "representation" (according to which meaning is determined by the objected signified) to focus instead upon the elastic potentialities of language to generate new meanings.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=20}}{{efn|{{harvnb|Poster|1989|loc= (p. 4)}} offers as linguistic examples ''écriture'' (Derrida), ]/practice (Foucault), code (Baudrillard), and phrases and '']'' (Lyotard). On signification more generally, {{harvnb|Best|Kellner|1991|loc= (p. 21)}} present dissemination (Derrida), desire (Deleuze and Guattari), intensities (Lyotard), semiurgy (Baudrillard), and power (Foucault).}}
The linguist and philosopher ] has said that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge. He asks why postmodernist intellectuals do not respond like people in other fields when asked, "what are the principles of their theories, on what evidence are they based, what do they explain that wasn't already obvious, etc.?...If can't be met, then I'd suggest recourse to ]'s advice in similar circumstances: 'to the flames'."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bactra.org/chomsky-on-postmodernism.html|title=Noam Chomsky on Post-Modernism|work=bactra.org}}</ref>


Politically, all of them began with Marxist sympathies, became disillusioned, and eventually opposed the ] and its application of theory.{{sfn|Poster|1989|p=4}} The chaos following the briefly successful communist revolution of ] in France was a particular point of rupture.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=17}}
Christian philosopher ] has said "The idea that we live in a postmodern culture is a myth. In fact, a postmodern culture is an impossibility; it would be utterly unliveable. People are not relativistic when it comes to matters of science, ], and technology; rather, they are relativistic and pluralistic in matters of religion and ]. But, of course, that's not postmodernism; that's ]!"<ref>{{cite news|last=Craig|first=William Lane|authorlink=William Lane Craig| title=God is Not Dead Yet|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/july/13.22.html|accessdate=30 April 2014|newspaper=Christianity Today|date=July 3, 2008}}</ref>


==== Jacques Derrida and deconstruction ====
American academic and aesthete ] has said "The end result of four decades of postmodernism permeating the art world is that there is very little interesting or important work being done right now in the fine arts. Irony was a bold and creative posture when ] did it, but it is now an utterly banal, exhausted, and tedious strategy. Young artists have been taught to be "cool" and "hip" and thus painfully self-conscious. They are not encouraged to be enthusiastic, emotional, and visionary. They have been cut off from artistic tradition by the crippled skepticism about history that they have been taught by ignorant and ] postmodernists. In short, the art world will never revive until postmodernism fades away. Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://faustomag.com/camille-paglia-postmodernism-is-a-plague-upon-the-mind-and-the-heart/ |title=Camille Paglia: "Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart" |last=de Castro |first=Eliana |date=12 December 2015 |work=Fausto Mag. |quote=Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart.}}</ref>
] is a practice in philosophy, literary criticism, and close reading developed by ]. It is based on the assumption, which it seeks to validate by textual analysis, that any text harbors inherent points of "undecidability" that undermine any stable meaning intended by the author. The process of writing inevitably, he aims to show, reveals suppressed elements, challenging the oppositions that are thought to sustain the text.{{sfn|Reynolds|loc=6=§2. Deconstructive Strategy}} Nevertheless, Derrida does not wish to do away with such concepts as "origin" or "truth". What he challenges is any claim to finality. Such metaphysical concepts are, as he puts it, "under erasure", and this, he says, makes deconstructive reading a kind of "double play".{{sfn|Brooker|2003|p=66}}


From this perspective, Derrida argues that the practice of metaphysics in the Western tradition depends upon hierarchies and orders of subordination within various dualisms that it does not acknowledge. It prioritizes presence and purity over the contingent and complicated, dismissing them as aberrations irrelevant to philosophical analysis. In essence, according to Derrida, metaphysical thought prioritizes one side of an opposition while ignoring or marginalizing the alternative.{{sfn|Reynolds|loc=6=§2.a Metaphysics of Presence/Logocentrism}} He uses the term ] to describe the foundationalist approach to knowledge, taking himself to have demonstrated that we do not have unmediated access to reality. This project of deconstructing and challenging the assumptions of modern philosophy was influential for many postmodern thinkers.{{sfn|Best|Kellner|1991|p=20}}
German philosopher ] has said that "postmodernism at its best might be seen as a self-critical - a sceptical, ironic, but nevertheless unrelenting - form of modernism; a modernism beyond utopianism, scientism and ]; in short a postmetaphysical modernism."<ref>{{cite book | last = Wellmer | first = Albrecht | title = The persistence of modernity : essays on aesthetics, ethic, and postmodernism | chapter = Introduction | publisher = MIT Press | location = Cambridge, Mass | year = 1991 | isbn = 0262231603 }}</ref>


====Michel Foucault on power relations====
A formal, academic critique of postmodernism can be found in '']'' by physics professor ] and in '']'' by Sokal and Belgian physicist ], both books discussing the so-called ]. In 1996, Sokal wrote a deliberately nonsensical article<ref>{{citation|last1=Sokal|first1=Alan D.|title=Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity|journal=Social Text|date=1996|volume=46–47|pages=217–252|doi=10.2307/466856|url=http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html|access-date=March 15, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170519124532/http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html|archive-date=May 19, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> in a style similar to postmodernist articles, which was accepted for publication by the postmodern cultural studies journal, '']''. On the same day of the release he published another article in a different journal explaining the ''Social Text'' article hoax.<ref name="experiments">{{citation |url=http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9605/sokal.html |title=A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies |last=Sokal |first=Alan D. |journal=] |date=5 June 1996 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071005011354/http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9605/sokal.html |archive-date=Oct 5, 2007 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jedlitschka|first=Karsten|date=2018-08-05|title=Guenter Lewy, Harmful and Undesirable. Book Censorship in Nazi Germany. Oxford, Oxford University Press 2016|journal=Historische Zeitschrift|volume=307|issue=1|pages=274–275|doi=10.1515/hzhz-2018-1368|issn=2196-680X}}</ref> The philosopher ] has supported Sokal and Bricmont, describing their book '']'' as consisting largely of "extensive quotations of scientific gibberish from name-brand French intellectuals, together with eerily patient explanations of why it is gibberish,"<ref>{{cite book
French philosopher and social theorist ] argued that power operates according to the logics of social institutions that have become unmoored from the intentions of any actual individuals. Individuals, according to Foucault, are both products and participants in these dynamics. Among other strategies, he employed a Nietzsche-inspired "]" to analyze power-relations across their historical permutations.{{sfn|Kelly|loc=lead section}}
| last = Nagel
| first = Thomas
| authorlink = Thomas Nagel
| title = Concealment and Exposure & Other Essays
| url = https://archive.org/details/concealmentexpos00nage
| url-access = limited
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2002
| page =
| isbn = 978-0-19-515293-7}}
</ref> and agreeing that "there does seem to be something about the Parisian scene that is particularly hospitable to reckless verbosity."<ref>Nagel, p. 165.</ref>


Both Foucault's political orientation and the consistency of his positions continue to be debated among critics and defenders alike. Nevertheless, Foucault's political works share two common elements: a historical perspective and a discursive methodology. He analyzed social phenomena in historical contexts and focused on how they have evolved over time. Additionally, he employed the study of written texts, usually academic texts, as the material for his inquiries. In this way, Foucault sought to understand how the historical formation of discourses has shaped contemporary political thinking and institutions.{{sfn|Kelly|loc=lead section}}
A more recent example of the difficulty of distinguishing nonsensical artifacts from genuine postmodernist scholarship is the ].<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1186/s41073-018-0060-4 |pmid = 30705761|pmc = 6348612|title = Replicability and replication in the humanities|journal = Research Integrity and Peer Review|volume = 4|pages = 2|year = 2019|last1 = Peels|first1 = Rik}}</ref>


====Gilles Deleuze on productive difference====
The French psychotherapist and philosopher, ], often considered a "postmodernist", rejected its theoretical assumptions by arguing that the structuralist and postmodernist visions of the world were not flexible enough to seek explanations in psychological, social and environmental domains at the same time.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Guattari|first1=Felix|title=The three ecologies|journal=New Formations|date=1989|url=http://www.amielandmelburn.org.uk/collections/newformations/08_131.pdf|page=134|number=8}}</ref>
The work of ] developed a concept of {{em|difference}} as a productive mechanism, rather than as a merely negative phenomenon. He advocated for a critique of reason that emphasizes sensibility and feeling over rational judgment. Following Nietzsche, Deleuze argued that philosophical critique is an encounter between thought and what forces it into action, and that this requires training, discipline, inventiveness, and even a certain "cruelty". He believed that thought cannot activate itself, but needs external forces to awaken and move it. Art, science, and philosophy can provide such activation through their transformative and experimental nature.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§4. Productive Difference}}


====Jean Baudrillard on hyperreality====
Zimbabwean-born British Marxist ] says that postmodernism "reflects the disappointed revolutionary generation of '68, and the incorporation of many of its members into the professional and managerial 'new middle class'. It is best read as a symptom of political frustration and social mobility rather than as a significant intellectual or cultural phenomenon in its own right."<ref>{{cite book | last = Callinicos | first = Alex | title = Against postmodernism : a Marxist critique | publisher = St. Martin's Press | location = New York, N.Y | year = 1990 | isbn = 0312042248 }}</ref>
Although trained in sociology, ] worked across many disciplines. Drawing upon ] of the psychoanalyst ], Baudrillard argued that social production had shifted from creating real objects to instead producing signs and symbols. This system of symbolic exchange, detached from the real, constitutes hyperreality. In the words of one commentator, "the hyperreal is a system of simulation that simulates itself."{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§6. Hyperreality}}


Postmodernity, Baudrillard said, is the condition in which the domain of reality has become so heavily mediated by signs as to become inaccessible in itself, leaving us entirely in the domain of the ], images that bear no relation to anything outside of themselves.{{sfn|Connor|2004|pages=568–69}} This hyperreality is presented as the terminal stage of simulation, where signs and images become entirely self-referential.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§6. Hyperreality}}
] in his book, '']'', writes, in advocating for simple, clear and direct expression of ideas, "The Postmodernists' tyranny wears people down by boredom and semi-literate prose."<ref>Christopher Hitchens. Why Orwell matters, Basic Books. {{ISBN|978-0465030507}}, 2002</ref>


Baudrillard's vision of postmodernity has been described as "apocalyptic",{{sfn|Constable|2004|pages=43–47}}{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=109}} and scholars disagree about whether his later works are intended as ] or truthful theoretical claims.{{sfn|Kellner|2020|loc=§6. Concluding Assessment}} Another interpretation is that Baudrillard deliberately adopts the role of '']''.{{sfn|Constable|2004|p=47}}
Analytic philosopher ] said, "Postmodernism, the school of 'thought' that proclaimed 'There are no truths, only interpretations' has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for 'conversations' in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster."<ref>DENNETT ON WIESELTIER V. PINKER IN THE NEW REPUBLIC http://edge.org/conversation/dennett-on-wieseltier-v-pinker-in-the-new-republic {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805021650/https://www.edge.org/conversation/dennett-on-wieseltier-v-pinker-in-the-new-republic |date=5 August 2018 }}</ref>


===A crisis of legitimacy===
American historian ] traces the origins of postmodernism to intellectual roots in ], writing "postmodernism has been nourished by the doctrines of ], ], ], and ]—all of whom either prefigured or succumbed to the proverbial intellectual fascination with fascism."<ref>{{cite book | last = Wolin | first = Richard | title = The seduction of unreason : the intellectual romance with fascism : from Nietzsche to postmodernism | publisher = Princeton University Press | location = Princeton | year = 2019 | isbn = 978-0691192352 }}</ref>
At the center of the intellectual debate about postmodernism is the question of what, if anything, grounds theory. What establishes that a statement is true or that an action is right? This foundational debate is most prominently on display in Habermas's rejoinder to Lyotard's anti-foundational, postmodern challenge to Habermas's own foundation version of modernism.{{sfn|Poster|1989|pages=12–16}}


==== ''The Postmodern Condition'' ====
] and ] criticised postmodernism for reducing the complexity of the modern world to an expression of power and for undermining truth and reason:
], 1995]]
{{quote|If the modern era begins with the ], the postmodern era that captivates the radical ] begins with its rejection. According to the new radicals, the Enlightenment-inspired ideas that have previously structured our world, especially the legal and academic parts of it, are a fraud perpetrated and perpetuated by white males to consolidate their own power. Those who disagree are not only blind but bigoted. The Enlightenment's goal of an objective and reasoned basis for knowledge, merit, truth, justice, and the like is an impossibility: "objectivity," in the sense of standards of judgment that transcend individual perspectives, does not exist. Reason is just another code word for the views of the privileged. The Enlightenment itself merely replaced one socially constructed view of reality with another, mistaking power for knowledge. There is naught but power.<ref>Daniel Farber and Suzanne Sherry, Beyond All Reason The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/books/first/f/farber-reason.html</ref>}}
] is credited with being the first to use the term "postmodern" in a philosophical context. This appeared in his 1979 '']''. In this influential work, Lyotard provided the following definition: "Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity towards metanarratives".{{sfn|Lyotard|1984|p=xxiv}}{{efn|{{lang|fr|Le métarécit}}, sometimes also {{lang|fr|grand récit}}, "grand narrative"}}


By "metanarratives", Lyotard meant such overarching narrative frameworks as those provided by ], ], and ] that unite and determine our basic sense of our place and significance in the world.{{sfn|Herwitz|2008|loc=Theories of the Postmodern}} It was his early disillusionment with his early Marxism that would later be generalized into the universal claim about metanarratives.{{sfn|Gratton|2018|loc=§1}} In a society with no unifying narrative, he argued, we are left with heterogeneous, group-specific narratives (or "]", as adopted from ]{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}}) with no universal perspective from which to adjudicate among them.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§2 The Postmodern Condition}}
], ], David Stoesz & Bruce Thyer consider postmodernism to be a "dead end in social work epistemology." They write:
{{quote|Postmodernism continues to have a detrimental influence on social work, questioning the Enlightenment, criticizing established research methods, and challenging scientific authority. The promotion of postmodernism by editors of ''Social Work'' and the ''Journal of Social Work Education'' has elevated postmodernism, placing it on a par with theoretically guided and empirically based research. The inclusion of postmodernism in the 2008 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and its 2015 sequel further erode the knowledge-building capacity of social work educators. In relation to other disciplines that have exploited empirical methods, social work's stature will continue to ebb until postmodernism is rejected in favor of scientific methods for generating knowledge.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1080/10437797.2015.1076260 |title = Postmodernism: A Dead End in Social Work Epistemology|journal = Journal of Social Work Education|volume = 51|issue = 4|pages = 638–647|year = 2015|last1 = Caputo|first1 = Richard|last2 = Epstein|first2 = William|last3 = Stoesz|first3 = David|last4 = Thyer|first4 = Bruce}}</ref>}}


According to Lyotard, this introduced a general crisis of legitimacy, a theme he adopts from the philosopher ], whose theory of ] Lyotard rejected.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|p=111}}{{sfn|Lyotard|1984|pages=65–66}} While he was particularly concerned in that report with the way that this insight undermined claims of scientific objectivity, Lyotard's argument undermines the entire principle of transcendent legitimization.{{sfn|Bertens|1995|pages=119–21}}{{sfn|Lyotard|1984|pages=xxiii–xxv}} Instead, proponents of a language game must make the case for their legitimacy with reference to such considerations as efficiency or practicality.{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} Far from celebrating the apparently relativistic consequences of this argument, however, Lyotard focused much of his subsequent work on how links among games could be established, particularly with respect to ethics and politics.{{sfn|Gratton|2018|loc=§§3.2–3.4}}
H. Sidky pointed out what he sees as several "inherent flaws" of a postmodern antiscience perspective, including the confusion of the authority of science (evidence) with the scientist conveying the knowledge; its self-contradictory claim that all truths are relative; and its strategic ambiguity. He sees 21st-century anti-scientific and pseudo-scientific approaches to knowledge, particularly in the United States, as rooted in a postmodernist "decades-long academic assault on science:"
{{quote|Many of those indoctrinated in postmodern anti-science went on to become conservative political and religious leaders, policymakers, journalists, journal editors, judges, lawyers, and members of city councils and school boards. Sadly, they forgot the lofty ideals of their teachers, except that science is bogus.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sidky |first1=H. |title=The War on Science, Anti-Intellectualism, and 'Alternative Ways of Knowing' in 21st-Century America |journal=] |date=2018 |volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=38–43 |url=https://www.csicop.org/si/show/e_war_on_science_anti-intellectualism_and_alternative_ways_of_knowing_in_21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180606170145/https://www.csicop.org/si/show/e_war_on_science_anti-intellectualism_and_alternative_ways_of_knowing_in_21 |accessdate=6 June 2018|archive-date=6 June 2018 }}</ref>}}


====The philosophical criticism of Jürgen Habermas====
==See also==
The philosopher ], a prominent critic of philosophical postmodernism, argued in his 1985 work '']''{{efn|This volume is an extension of his 1980 speech "Modernity—An Unfinished Project", published the next year as "Modernity versus Postmodernity". Even though Lyotard is not treated directly, Habermas describes the work as an explicit response to Lyotard's challenges to the theory of ].{{sfn|Habermas|1990|p=xix}}}} that postmodern thinkers were caught in a performative contradiction, more specifically, that their critiques of modernity rely on concepts and methods that are themselves products of modern reason.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§9}}
{{col-begin}}

{{col-2}}
Habermas criticized these thinkers for their rejection of the subject and their embrace of experimental, avant-garde strategies. He asserted that their critiques of modernism ultimately lead to a longing for the very subject they seek to dismantle. Habermas also took issue with postmodernists' leveling of the distinction between philosophy and literature. He argued that such rhetorical strategies undermine the importance of argument and ].{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§9}}

Habermas's critique of postmodernism set the stage for much of the subsequent debate by clarifying some of its key underlying issues. According to scholar Gary Aylesworth – against those who would dismiss postmodernist discourse as simple nonsense – the fact that Habermas was "able to read postmodernist texts closely and discursively testifies to their intelligibility". His engagement with their ideas has led some postmodern philosophers, following Lyotard, to similarly engage with Habermas's criticisms.{{sfn|Aylesworth|2015|loc=§9}}

===Frederic Jameson's Marxist rejoinder===
The appearance of linguistic relativism also inspired an extensive rebuttal by the ] critic ].{{sfn|Bertens|1995|page=108}} Building upon the theoretical foundations laid out by the Marxist economist ]{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} and observations in the early work of the sociologist ],{{sfn|Connor|2004|page=3}} Jameson developed his own conception of the postmodern as "the cultural logic of ]" in the form of an enormous cultural expansion into an economy of spectacle and style, rather than the production of goods.{{sfn|Connor|2004|pages=3–4}}{{sfn|Buchanan|2018}} According to Jameson, because the postmodernism is result of political and historical circumstances that make up the social world, it is not something that can be simply embraced or condemned. Instead, it must be analyzed and understood so that we may confront the world as it is.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=120}}

Jameson categorizes a variety of features of the postmodern. One is the elision of the distinction between high culture and mass culture.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=121}} Also, because of our loss of a unified "bourgeois ego", subjectivity is less focused, and we experience what he terms a "waning of the affect", an emotional disengagement from the social world.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=124}} This loss of significance leads to what he calls "depthlessness", a difficulty in getting beneath the surfaces of cultural objects to find any deeper significance than is offered directly to the subject.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=126}} Reduced to a set of styles, history looses its political force.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=128}} This phenomenon finds expression, for instance, in the shift from "parody", in which styles are mixed in the interest of making a point, to "pastiche", in which styles are mixed together without attention to their original contexts.{{sfn|Roberts|2000|p=133}}

===Richard Rorty's neopragmatism===
] was an American philosopher known for his linguistic form of ]. Initially attracted to ], Rorty later rejected its representationalism. His major influences, rather than the poststructuralists, include ], ], ], and Martin Heidegger.{{sfn|Grippe|loc=lead section}}

Rorty challenged the notion of a mind-independent, language-independent reality. He argued that language is a tool used to adapt to the environment and achieve desired ends. This ] approach led him to abandon the traditional quest for a privileged mental power that allows direct access to things-in-themselves.{{sfn|Grippe|loc=lead section}}

Instead, Rorty advocated for a focus on imaginative alternatives to present beliefs rather than the pursuit of independently grounded truths. He believed that creative, ], free from authoritarian assertions about truth and goodness, is the key to a better future. Rorty saw his neopragmatism as a continuation of the Enlightenment project, aiming to demystify human life and replace traditional power relations with those based on tolerance and freedom.{{sfn|Grippe|loc=lead section}}

==In other fields==
Postmodernism is more fully understood by observing its effects in such diverse fields as law, education, urban planning, religious studies, politics and many others.{{Sfn|Linn|1996|p=xiv}} Its influence varies widely across disciplines, reflecting the extent to which postmodern theories and ideas have been integrated into actual practices.

=== Anthropology ===
{{Main article|Postmodernist anthropology}}
Postmodern theory in ] originated in the 1960s, alongside the literary postmodern movement.{{Citation needed|date=November 2024}} ] is central to postmodern anthropology, a continuous practice of critical self-awareness that attempts to address the subjectivity inherent in interpretation.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Barnard |first=Alan |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-and-theory-in-anthropology/F3F074621C25D62FDC97876A0C03D615 |title=History and Theory in Anthropology |date=2021 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-83795-8 |edition=2 |location=Cambridge |pages=174 - 189 |chapter=Postmodernism and Its Aftermath |doi=10.1017/9781108936620}}</ref> Other key practices are an emphasis on including the perspectives of the people being studied;<ref name=":5">Barrett, S. (1996). Anthropology: a Students Guide to Theory and Method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (pp. 150-163)</ref> ], which considers values and beliefs within their cultural context;<ref name="Garder1996">{{cite book |last=Katy Garder and David Lewis |title=Anthropology, Development and the Post-Modernist Challenge |publisher=Pluto Press |year=1996 |isbn=0745307469 |location=London, UK |pages=22–23}}</ref> skepticism towards the notion that science can produce objective and universally valid knowledge;<ref name="Spiro1996">{{cite journal |last=Spiro |first=Melford E. |date=October 1996 |title=Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Science: A Modernist Critique |url=http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/readings/spiro-anti-pomo.pdf |journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=759–780 |doi=10.1017/s0010417500020521 |s2cid=18702184 |accessdate=29 March 2013}}</ref> and rejection of grand narratives or theories that attempt to explain other cultures.<ref name=":5" />

Anthropologists working in a postmodern vein seek to dissect, interpret and write cultural critiques, analyzing of cultural texts and practices, rather than relying on empirical observation.{{Citation needed|date=November 2024}} The issue of subjectivity is a concern: as ] are influenced by the perspective of the author, the question arises in the study of individual cultures as to whether the author's opinions should be considered scientific.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hegelund |first=Allan |date=May 2005 |title=Objectivity and Subjectivity in the Ethnographic Method |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732304273933 |journal=Qualitative Health Research |language=en |volume=15 |issue=5 |pages=647–668 |doi=10.1177/1049732304273933 |pmid=15802541 |issn=1049-7323 |quote=Today, we acknowledge that objectivity is relative to a given perspective or preunderstanding, but the applied perspective must compete with other perspectives or paradigms in its effectiveness in our understanding and managing of a lived reality. ... Historically, the notions of objectivity and subjectivity have played a central role in the sciences. Today, their conventional meaning and dichotomy are under attack by the postmodern ways of thinking. During the past few decades, any mention of words and expressions such as truth, knowledge, value free, objectivity, bias, fact, reality, and correspondence between word and world has come to be regarded with increasing suspicion, up to the point where many scientists seem unwilling to run the risk of using them at all. This trend ... seems to be much more pronounced in the humanities than in the natural sciences.}}</ref> ], considered a founding member of postmodernist anthropology,<ref>Erickson, P. (2017). A History of Anthropological Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (pp.130)</ref> holds that, "anthropological writings are themselves interpretations, and second and third order ones to boot. (By definition, only a 'native' makes first order ones: it's ''his'' culture.)"<ref>Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretations of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, Inc. (pp.15)</ref> In the 21st century, some anthropologists use a form of ], which prioritizes the perspectives of the subject over the perspective of the observer in cultural interpretation.{{Citation needed|date=November 2024}}

=== Archaeology ===
{{Main article|Post-processual archaeology}}
Significant postmodern influence is found in post-processual archaeology, a movement in ] that emphasizes the ] of archaeological interpretations and the importance of understanding the ].{{sfn|Johnson|2010|p=105}} Post-processualism questions the assumptions of processual archaeology to develop "a more humanist approach committed to understanding people and practices, social relationships and organizations, and ideology and power."{{sfn|Preucel|2018|p=12}} According to ], the discipline can be described as evolving through three periods. From 19th century, the ] relied on examination of the objects and architecture of ]. During the 1960s, the processual movement believed that rigorous use of the scientific method, for example, analyzing the spatial distribution of objects in a settlement, allowed for conclusions that went beyond the limits of the ]. The New Archaeology, as it was also known, dominating the Anglophone world in the 1970s.{{sfn|Trigger|2007}}

The post-processual movement originated in the ] during the late 1970s and early 1980s, pioneered by archaeologists such as ], ], ], and ]. They were responding to three central influences: Marxist-inspired ] that developed in France in the 1960s, postmodernism, and the new ] that emerged in the US.{{Sfn|Trigger|2007|p=44–50}} The movement came to consist of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions," with a common emphasis on understanding human behavior and agency through archeological materials.{{sfn|Johnson|2010|p=101}} The multiple lines of inquiry included "discussions of power and ideology, feminism, shifts to and from the notion that material culture can be read as a text, phenomenology, accounts of agency, landscape, the body, memory, materiality, the links between archaeology and heritage, indigenous rights, and ethics."{{Sfn|Hodder|2018}}

Although itself no longer a central topic of academic debate, post-processualism's practical influence remains significant.{{sfn|Preucel|2018}} In the U.S., post-processualism is often as seen as accompanying the processual approach; in the UK, post-processual archaeology is often seen as dominant and in opposition to other theoretical movements. In ] and parts of ], post-processualism has been integrated with the already dominant Marxist sociopolitical theoretical debate. Elsewhere in the world, the post-processual perspective has often contributed to postcolonial, indigenous, and political movements in archaeology.{{Sfn|Hodder|2018|p=8}}

=== Feminism ===
{{Main article|Postmodern feminism}}
Postmodern feminism mixes ] and ]<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Sands |first1=Roberta |last2=Nuccio |first2=Kathleen |date=Nov 1992 |title=Postmodern Feminist Theory and Social Work: A Deconstruction |journal=Social Work |volume=37 |pages=489 |doi=10.1093/sw/40.6.831 |issn=1545-6846}}</ref> that rejects a universal female subject.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Ebert |first=Teresa L. |date=Dec 1991 |title=The "Difference" of Postmodern Feminism |journal=College English |volume=53 |issue=8 |pages=886–904 |doi=10.2307/377692 |issn=0010-0994 |jstor=377692}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Tong |first=Rosemarie |url=https://archive.org/details/feministthoughtc00tong |title=Feminist thought : a comprehensive introduction |publisher=Westview Press |year=1989 |isbn=9780429493836 |location=Boulder, Colorado |pages=–224 |oclc=1041706991 |url-access=registration}}</ref> The goal is to destabilize the ] norms entrenched in society that have led to gender inequality.<ref name=":1" /> ], philosophy, and universal truths are opposed, in favor of embracing the differences that exist amongst women to demonstrate that not all women are the same.<ref name=":4" /> Applying universal truths to all women in a society minimizes individual experience; ideas displayed as the norm in society stem from masculine notions of how women should be portrayed.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wallin |first=Dawn C |title=Postmodern Feminism and Educational Policy Development |publisher=McGill Journal of Education |year=2001 |pages=27–43 |oclc=967130390}}</ref>

Postmodern feminism seeks to analyze notions that have led to gender inequality, and attempts to promote equality through critiquing ], supporting multiple discourses, deconstructing texts, and seeking to promote ].<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> This approach is not readily accepted by all feminists—some believe postmodern thought undermines the attacks that ] attempts to create, while other feminists are in favor of the union.<ref name=":3" />

=== Law ===
{{Main article|Postmodern law}}
In response to the perceived shortcomings of ] and ], postmodern legal scholars developed several new approaches to address both formal and ethical issues in ]. In particular, they emphasize the inequalities introduced to the legal system by such matters as race, gender, and economic status.{{sfn|Douzinas|2004|p=197}}

=== Marketing ===
{{Main|Postmodern marketing}}
Postmodernism in marketing focuses on customized experiences where broad market generalizations are no longer applied.<ref name="sbrown-pg192">{{Cite journal |last=Brown |first=Steven |year=1993 |title=Postmodern Marketing? |journal=European Journal of Marketing |publisher=European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27 Iss: 4 |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=19–34 |doi=10.1108/03090569310038094 |issn=0309-0566}}</ref> According to academic Stephen Brown, "Marketers know about consumers, consumers know about marketers, marketers know consumers know about marketers, and consumers know marketers know consumers know about marketers." Brown, writing in 1993, stated that the postmodern approach in many ways rejects attempts to impose order and work in silos. Instead marketers should work collectively with "artistic" attributes of intuition, creativity, spontaneity, speculation, emotion, and involvement.<ref name="sbrown-pg192"/>

A 2020 study in the '']'' investigated the reported transition from postmodernism to post-postmodernism, those "changing social conditions that lead the consumer to consume in a particular manner". Song lyrics were selected from Madonna (postmodern), ] (post-postmodern), and ] as a transitional example. Five postmodern characteristics consistently found in marketing literature were compared to their post-postmodern counterparts: ] to rewriting; ] to redifferentiation; ] to reengagement; reversal of production and consumption to rebalancing of production and consumption; and ] to alternative reality. Postmodernism, it finds, "remains vibrant, re-inventive, and calls for its demise may be somewhat overblown." Swift's success "suggests a significant shift from deconstructive to reconstructive positions regarding the self and its surroundings", noting that her "post-postmodern engagement, enthusiasm and sincerity" appeared to be "somewhat superficial, sociopathic, and couched in fabulation."<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Canavan |first1=Brendan |last2=McCamley |first2=Claire |date=2020-02-01 |title=The passing of the postmodern in pop? Epochal consumption and marketing from Madonna, through Gaga, to Taylor |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318306167 |journal=] |volume=107 |pages=222–230 |doi=10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.005 |issn=0148-2963}}</ref>

=== Psychology ===
{{Main article|Postmodern psychology}}
In 1992, under the headline, "A New Breed of Psychologists Says There’s No One Answer to the Question 'Who Am I?'", the '']'' reported on "a group of increasingly influential psychologists – postmodern psychologists seems to be the name that is sticking", who had come to the conclusion that "the American conception of an isolated, unified self" does not exist. People are composed of many different selves, constructed for different situations.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Stephens |first=Mitchell |date=Aug 23, 1992 |title=A New Breed of Psychologists Says There's No One Answer to the Question 'Who Am I?' |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-08-23-tm-7343-story.html |access-date=Dec 3, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> In this way, postmodernism challenges the ] view of psychology as the science of the individual,<ref>S. Kvale ed., ''Psychology and Postmodernism'' (1992) p. 40</ref> in favor of seeing humans as a cultural/communal product, dominated by language rather than by an inner self.<ref>L. Holtzman/J. R. Moss eds., ''Postmodern Psychologies, Societal Practice and Political Life'' (2000) p. 179</ref>

In 2001, ], a pioneer in postmodern psychological theory,&nbsp;identified "emphasis on the individual mind, an objectively knowable world, and language as carrier of truth" as the cornerstones of traditional modernist psychology. He noted criticism of these assumptions coming from "every quarter of the humanities and the sciences", and the emergence of a psychology in which "colonialist universalism is replaced by a global conversation among equals". He also considered the "strong critical reservation", including the realist argument that a socially constructed world cannot negate a clearly observable objective reality; the claim of incoherence, wherein postmodernism denies truth and objectivity while simultaneously making truth claims; and its moral relativism, which fails to take a principled ethical stand. Ultimately, he concluded that psychology's future is "hanging in the balance".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gergen |first=Kenneth J. |date=2001 |title=Psychological science in a postmodern context. |url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.803 |journal=American Psychologist |language=en |volume=56 |issue=10 |pages=803–813 |doi=10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.803 |issn=0003-066X}}</ref>

In 2021, psychologist ] discussed how psychology tried for decades to emulate the ] and address unpredictable individual behavior. He described how the dominant methodology came to rely exclusively on statistical analysis of group level data and average findings, whereby it "lost contact with the psychological processes going on in individual persons." He advocated for abandoning the natural science approach that had "led into a clearly discernible blind alley."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smedslund |first=Jan |date=2021-04-01 |title=From statistics to trust: Psychology in transition |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0732118X20302233 |journal=New Ideas in Psychology |volume=61 |pages=100848 |doi=10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100848 |issn=0732-118X|doi-access=free }}</ref>

In 2024, American psychology professor Edwin Gantt wrote that psychology remains in a state of continual struggle "to decide whether its true intellectual home is to be found among the humanities, especially philosophy and literature, or among the STEM disciplines." He finds psychology "a key site where the intellectual tug-of-war between modernism and postmodernism plays itself out in academia."{{Sfn|Gantt|2024}}

=== Urban planning ===
Modernism sought to design and plan cities that followed the logic of the new model of industrial ]; reverting to large-scale solutions, aesthetic standardization, and ] design solutions.{{sfn|Goodchild|1990|pp=119–137}} This approach was found to have eroded urban living by its failure to recognize differences and aim towards homogeneous landscapes.{{sfn|Simonsen|1990|p=57}} ]'s 1961 book ''],''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jacobs |first=Jane |url=https://archive.org/details/deathlifeofgreat0000jaco |title=The death and life of great American cities |publisher=Modern Library |year=1993 |isbn=0-679-64433-4 |location=New York |url-access=registration}}</ref> was a sustained critique of urban planning as it had developed within modernism,{{sfn|Irving|1993|p=479}} and played a major role in turning public opinion against modernist planners, notably ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=February 3, 2010 |title=The Next American System&nbsp;— The Master Builder (1977) |url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/video/the-dig-web-video-the-master-builder-1977/925/ |publisher=]}}</ref>

Postmodern urban planning involves theories that embrace and aim to create diversity, elevating uncertainty, flexibility, and change, and rejecting utopianism while embracing a utopian way of thinking and acting.{{sfn|Hatuka|d'Hooghe|2007|pp=20–27}} The postmodernity of "resistance" seeks to deconstruct modernism, a critique of the origins without necessarily returning to them.{{sfn|Irving|1993|p=460}} As a result, planners are much less inclined to lay a firm or steady claim to there being one single "right way" of engaging in urban planning and are more open to different styles and ideas of "how to plan".<ref>{{harvnb|Goodchild|1990|pp=119–137}}; {{harvnb|Hatuka|d'Hooghe|2007|pp=20–27}}; {{harvnb|Irving|1993|pp=474–87}}; {{harvnb|Simonsen|1990|pp=51–62}}</ref>

This postmodern reaction is often compared with the modernist ], the then dominant movement founded at the ] in the 1920s. Sociologist ]'s prominent concentric circle model depicted urban areas as a series of concentric functional zones that sorted population groups.<ref name="Soja 2014">{{Cite book |last=Soja |first=Edward W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ok3rAgAAQBAJ |title=My Los Angeles: From Urban Restructuring to Regional Urbanization |date=14 March 2014 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-520-95763-3 |language=en |via=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Caves |first=R. W. |title=Encyclopedia of the City |publisher=Routledge |year=2004 |isbn=9780415252256 |pages=437}}</ref> It proposed a central business core, circled by transitional immigrant and working class areas, then by more affluent outer commuter rings.<ref>{{Harvnb|Dear|Flusty|1998|p=51}} "Burgess’s model was a broad generalization, not intended to be taken too literally. He expected, for instance, that his schema would apply only in the absence of complicating factors such as local topography. He also anticipated considerable variation within the different zones."</ref> In contrast, for example, the postmodernist ], primarily associated with the ], viewed ] as a prototypical postmodern city, a "multi-nucleated megacity encompassing hundreds of municipalities", sprawling and centerless. The LA School analysis emphasized the global-local connection, pervasive social fragmentation, and a "reterritorialization of the urban process in which hinterland organizes the center (in direct contradiction to the Chicago model)".{{Sfn|Dear|Flusty|1998|p=50}}

A review of postmodern urbanism literature, published in 2018 in the ''Journal of Architectural and Planning Research'', examined coverage of style, epoch, and method, noting a general lack of cohesive definition, and the use of questionable interpretation to form conceptual statements. The review concluded that as a theoretical construct, postmodern urbanism "is relevant to planning and design theory insofar as it rejects modernist 'rational' planning." However, given that urban planning and design are grounded in practice, postmodern theoretical ideas offer "little insight that professionals can use."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Garde |first=Ajay |date=2018 |title=Value of Postmodernism for Urban Planning and Design |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26893774 |journal=Journal of Architectural and Planning Research |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=291–302 |jstor=26893774 |issn=0738-0895}}</ref>

=== Theology ===
{{Main article|Postmodern theology}}
The postmodern theological movement interprets ] in light of postmodern theory and various forms of post-] thought, using approaches such as ], ], and ] to question fixed interpretations, explore the role of ], and uncover hidden textual assumptions and contradictions.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Raschke |first=Carl |title=Postmodern Theology: A Biopic |year=2017}}</ref> The movement emerged in the 1980s and 1990s when a handful of philosophers who took philosopher ] as a common point of departure began publishing books engaging with Christian theology.{{sfn|Vanhoozer|2003|pp=22–25}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Crockett |first=Clayton |url=https://archive.org/details/radicalpolitical00croc |title=Radical Political Theology |year=2011 |pages= |url-access=limited}}</ref>

Theologian ] combines and expands on other scholarly classifications to present seven types of postmodern theology: postliberal, postmetaphysical, deconstructive, reconstructive, ], Anglo-American postmodernity, and ]. He notes that the typology should be considered "provisional and fallible not entirely arbitrary", having met two main criteria: each is an approach taken by more than one theologian, and each "believes itself to be responding to, rejecting, or passing through modernity, not inhabiting it."{{sfn|Vanhoozer|2003|p=20}}

==Ongoing influence==
{{See also|Modernism|Metamodernism}}
Since the late 1990s, there has been a growing sentiment in popular culture and in academia that postmodernism "has gone out of fashion".<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Potter |editor1-first=Garry |editor2-last=Lopez |editor2-first=Jose |title=After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism |location=London |publisher=The Athlone Press |date=2001 |page=4}}</ref> Others argue that postmodernism is dead in the context of current cultural production.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fjellestad |first1=Danuta |last2=Engberg |first2=Maria |year=2013 |title=Toward a Concept of Post-Postmodernism or Lady Gaga's Reconfigurations of Madonna |url=http://reconstruction.eserver.org/124/Fjellestad-Engberg.shtml |journal=Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture |volume=12 |issue=4 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130223103043/http://reconstruction.eserver.org/124/Fjellestad-Engberg.shtml |archive-date=23 February 2013}} DiVA .</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kirby |first=Alan |year=2006 |title=The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond |url=https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond |journal=] |volume=58 |pages=34–37 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Gibbons |first=Alison |date=2017 |title=Postmodernism is dead. What comes next? |url=https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/postmodernism-dead-comes-next/ |access-date=17 February 2020 |website=TLS |language=en-GB }}</ref>

The connection between postmodernism, ], and ] has led to a challenge to postmodernism, for which the terms '']'' and ''postpoststructuralism'' were first coined in 2003.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mann |first=Steve |year=2003 |title=Decon<sup>2</sup> (Decon Squared): Deconstructing Decontamination |url=http://wearcam.org/decon2/decon_leonardo_leon_36_4_285_0.pdf |journal=Leonardo |volume=36 |issue=4 |pages=285–290 |doi=10.1162/002409403322258691 |jstor=1577323 |s2cid=57559253 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Campbell |first=Heidi A. |year=2006 |title=Postcyborg Ethics: A New Way to Speak of Technology |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274327317 |journal=Explorations in Media Ecology |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=279–296 |doi=10.1386/eme.5.4.279_1 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Mann |first1=Steve |last2=Fung |first2=James |last3=Federman |first3=Mark |last4=Baccanico |first4=Gianluca |year=2002 |title=PanopDecon: Deconstructing, decontaminating, and decontextualizing panopticism in the postcyborg era |journal=Surveillance & Society |volume=1 |issue=3 |pages=375–398 |doi=10.24908/ss.v1i3.3346 |doi-access=free}}</ref>

In "White Noise/White Heat, or Why the Postmodern Turn in Rock Music Led to Nothing but Road" (2004), literary critic and professor of English and comparative literature ] reexamined his rock music essay, "White Noise", published in the journal '']'' in 1990''.'' He noted "the almost casual assurance" of its definition of postmodernism, and the "easy assumption throughout that it is possible to draw analogies about the 'innovative features' of fundamentally different media, such as music and fiction." From his 2004 perspective, he says, "If I were writing such an essay today I would omit 'postmodernism' entirely because I no longer believe that I (or anyone else for that matter) can articulate with any degree of coherence or specificity what 'postmodernism' is, or was, what it's supposed to mean, or, indeed, whether it ever existed at all."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McCaffery |first=Larry |date=May 24, 2004 |title=White Noise/White Heat, or Why the Postmodern Turn in Rock Music Led to Nothing but Road |url=https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/white-noise-white-heat-or-why-the-postmodern-turn-in-rock-music-led-to-nothing-but-road/ |access-date=Sep 26, 2024 |journal=]}}</ref>

In 2011, ''],'' at the ] in London, was billed as "the first in-depth survey of art, design and architecture of the 1970s and 1980s".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 - 1990 |url=http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/exhibitions/postmodernism/ |access-date=Sep 25, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> The first of three "broadly chronological" sections focused mainly on architecture, "the discipline in which the ideas of postmodernism first emerged", as well as certain designers. The second section featured 1980s design, art, music, fashion, performance, and club culture. The final section examined "the hyper-inflated commodity culture of the 1980s", focusing on money as "a source of endless fascination for artists, designers and authors".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 – 1990 |url=https://www.vam.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/178541/v-and-a-postmodernism-updated.pdf |access-date=Sep 25, 2024 |website=Victoria and Albert Museum}}</ref> A review in the journal '']'' noted the "daunting prospect" of critiquing an exhibition "on what might be considered the most slippery, indefinable 'movement'", and wondered what the curators must have felt: "One reviewer thought it 'a risky curatorial undertaking,' and even the curators themselves admit it could be seen as 'a fool's errand.{{'"}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Atkinson |first=Paul |date=2012 |title="Postmodernism: Style and Subversion, 1970-1990" |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23273855 |journal=Design Issues |volume=28 |issue=4 |pages=93–97 |doi=10.1162/DESI_r_00179 |issn=0747-9360 |jstor=23273855}}</ref>

Writing in 2022, ] argues that, despite continuing reports of its death or imminent demise, postmodernism has instead undergone a kind of disappearance into our culture by way of assimilation. He notes there is little that can now be called postmodern style because "the clashing or commingling of styles has become entirely routine at all levels of culture." The energizing antagonism between high and low culture has been "pestled into a tepid porridge." And the general postmodern condition is now "universal, irreversible and metastable, embodied above all in the massive increase in digitally mediated information technologies." According to Connor, postmodernism in the 2020s is a sensibility that has been integrated into everyday life, having been subject to a considerable degree of shifting, perhaps temporarily, from irony, pluralism and ambivalence to urgency, indignation and reductive absolutism.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Connor |first=Steven |date=2022 |title=What is/was Post-Modern: Irony, Urgency (and So On) |url=https://www.jencksfoundation.org/explore/text/what-is-was-post-modern-irony-urgency-and-so-on |url-status=live |access-date=Dec 28, 2024 |website=Jencks Foundation}}</ref>

A small group of critics has put forth a range of theories that aim to describe culture or society in the alleged aftermath of postmodernism, most notably Raoul Eshelman (performatism), ] (]), ] (]), and Alan Kirby (digimodernism, formerly called pseudo-modernism). None of these new theories or labels have so far gained very widespread acceptance.{{citation needed|date=January 2025}}

== See also ==
{{Postmodernism}}
{{col-float-begin|style=width:35em}}
;Theory ;Theory
* {{annotated link|Critical theory}}
* {{annotated link|Integral philosophy|Integral theory}}
* {{annotated link|Hyperreality}}
* {{annotated link|Transmodernism}}
* {{Annotated link|Anti-foundationalism}} * {{Annotated link|Anti-foundationalism}}
* {{annotated link|Transmodernism}}

;Culture and politics ;Culture and politics
* {{annotated link|Defamiliarization}} * {{annotated link|Defamiliarization}}
{{col-float-break|style=width:35em}}
* {{annotated link|Disenchantment}}
* {{annotated link|Sokal affair}}
* {{annotated link|Syncretism}}

;Politics
* {{annotated link|Post-realism}}
{{Col-2}}
;Philosophy
* {{annotated link|Epistemological nihilism}}
* {{annotated link|Idealism}}

;Religion ;Religion
* {{annotated link|Postmodern religion}} * {{annotated link|Postmodern religion}}

;History ;History
* ''{{annotated link|Post-histoire}}'' * {{annotated link|Second modernity}}
* ]

;Opposed by ;Opposed by
* {{annotated link|Altermodern}} * {{annotated link|Altermodern}}
* {{annotated link|Metamodernism}}
* {{annotated link|Remodernism}} * {{annotated link|Remodernism}}
{{col-float-end}}
* {{annotated link|Remodernist film}}
* {{annotated link|Stuckism}}
{{col-end}}


==References== == References ==
{{Reflist}}


==Further reading== === Notes ===
{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Alexie, Sherman (2000). "The Toughest Indian in the World" ({{ISBN|0-8021-3800-4}})
* Anderson, Walter Truett. ''The Truth about the Truth (New Consciousness Reader)''. New York: Tarcher. (1995) ({{ISBN|0-87477-801-8}})
* Anderson, Perry. ''The origins of postmodernity''. London: Verso, 1998.
* Arena, Leonardo Vittorio (2015) ''On Nudity. An Introduction to Nonsense'', Mimesis International.
* Ashley, Richard and Walker, R. B. J. (1990) "Speaking the Language of Exile." ''International Studies Quarterly'' v 34, no 3 259–68.
* ] (2000) ''Liquid Modernity''. Cambridge: Polity Press.
* ] (1986) ''Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity''.
* Benhabib, Seyla (1995) 'Feminism and Postmodernism' in (ed. Nicholson) ''Feminism Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange''. New York: Routledge.
* Berman, Marshall (1982) ''All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity'' ({{ISBN|0-14-010962-5}}).
* ] (1995) ''The Idea of the Postmodern: A History''. London: Routledge. ({{ISBN|978-0-415-06012-7}}).
* Best, Steven Best and Douglas Kellner. ''Postmodern Theory '' (1991)
* Best, Steven Best and Douglas Kellner. ''The Postmodern Turn'' (1997)
* Bielskis, Andrius (2005) ''Towards a Postmodern Understanding of the Political: From Genealogy to Hermeneutics'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
* Braschi, Giannina (1994), Empire of Dreams, introduction by Alicia Ostriker, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
* Brass, Tom, ''Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism'' (London: Cass, 2000).
* ] (1995) 'Contingent Foundations' in (ed. Nicholson) ''Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange''. New York: Routledge.
* ], ''Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique'' (Cambridge: Polity, 1999).
* ] ''The Oxford Companion to English Literature'', 6 ed., article "Postmodernism".
* Farrell, John. "Paranoia and Postmodernism," the epilogue to ''Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau'' (Cornell UP, 2006), 309–327.
* Featherstone, M. (1991) Consumer culture and postmodernism, London; Newbury Park, Calif., Sage Publications.
* ] (1991) Modernity and Self Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
* Gosselin, Paul (2012) Flight From the Absolute: Cynical Observations on the Postmodern West. volume I. Samizdat ({{ISBN|978-2-9807774-3-1}})
* Goulimari, Pelagia (ed.) (2007) Postmodernism. What Moment? Manchester: Manchester University Press ({{ISBN|978-0-7190-7308-3}})
* Grebowicz, Margaret (ed.), ''Gender After Lyotard''. NY: Suny Press, 2007. ({{ISBN|978-0-7914-6956-9}})
* Greer, Robert C. ''Mapping Postmodernism''. IL: Intervarsity Press, 2003. ({{ISBN|0-8308-2733-1}})
* Groothuis, Douglas. ''Truth Decay''. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2000.
* Harvey, David (1989) ''The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change'' ({{ISBN|0-631-16294-1}})
* ], ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy'', article "Postmodernism".
* Hutcheon, Linda. ''The Politics of Postmodernism.'' (2002)
* Jameson, Fredric (1991) '']'' ({{ISBN|0-8223-1090-2}})
* {{cite journal|author1=Mr. Keedy|title=Graphic Design in the Postmodern Era|journal=Emigre|date=1998|issue=47|url=https://www.emigre.com/Magazine/47}}
* Kimball, Roger (2000). ''Experiments against Reality: the Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age''. Chicago: I.R. Dee. viii, 359 p. ({{ISBN|1-56663-335-4}})
* Kirby, Alan (2009) ''Digimodernism''. New York: Continuum.
* Lash, S. (1990) ''The sociology of postmodernism'' London, Routledge.
* Lucy, Niall. (2016) ''A dictionary of Postmodernism'' ({{ISBN|9781405150774}})
* Lyotard, Jean-François (1984) '']: A Report on Knowledge'' ({{ISBN|0-8166-1173-4}})
* --- (1988). ''The Postmodern Explained: Correspondence 1982–1985''. Ed. Julian Pefanis and Morgan Thomas. ({{ISBN|0-8166-2211-6}})
* --- (1993), "Scriptures: Diffracted Traces." In: ''Theory, Culture and Society'', Vol. 21(1), 2004.
* --- (1995), "Anamnesis: Of the Visible." In: ''Theory, Culture and Society'', Vol. 21(1), 2004.
* McHale, Brian, (1987) ''Postmodernist Fiction''. London: Routledge.
* --- (1992), ''Constructing Postmodernism''. NY & London: Routledge.
* --- (2008), "1966 Nervous Breakdown, or, When Did Postmodernism Begin?" ''Modern Language Quarterly'' 69, 3:391-413.
* --- (2007), "What Was Postmodernism?" electronic book review,
* MacIntyre, Alasdair, ]: A Study in Moral Theory (University of Notre Dame Press, 1984, 2nd edn.).
* ], ''Derrida on the Mend'' (Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 1984; 1986; pbk. 2000, ISBN I-55753-205-2).
* ---, ''On Deconstructing Life-Worlds: Buddhism, Christianity, Culture'' (Atlanta: Scholars Press of American Academy of Religion, 1997; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; {{ISBN|0-7885-0295-6}}, cloth, {{ISBN|0-7885-0296-4}}, pbk).
* Manuel, Peter. "Music as Symbol, Music as Simulacrum: Pre-Modern, Modern, and Postmodern Aesthetics in Subcultural Musics," Popular Music 1/2, 1995, pp.&nbsp;227–239.
* {{cite book|author1=Philip B. Meggs|author2=Alston W. Purvis|title=Meggs' History of Graphic Design|date=2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated|isbn=9780470168738|edition=5|chapter=22}}
*{{cite journal|last=Mura |first=Andrea |year=2012 |title=The Symbolic Function of Transmodernity |journal=Language and Psychoanalysis |issue=1 |pages=68–87 |url=https://www.language-and-psychoanalysis.com/Mura%202012.pdf |doi=10.7565/landp.2012.0005 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151008211951/http://www.language-and-psychoanalysis.com/Mura%202012.pdf |archivedate=8 October 2015}}
* Murphy, Nancey, ''Anglo-American Postmodernity: Philosophical Perspectives on Science, Religion, and Ethics'' (Westview Press, 1997).
* Natoli, Joseph (1997) ''A Primer to Postmodernity'' ({{ISBN|1-57718-061-5}})
* Norris, Christopher (1990) ''What's Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy'' ({{ISBN|0-8018-4137-2}})
* Pangle, Thomas L., ''The Ennobling of Democracy: The Challenge of the Postmodern Age'', Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991 {{ISBN|0-8018-4635-8}}
* Park, Jin Y., ed., ''Buddhisms and Deconstructions'' Lanham: Rowland & Littlefield, 2006, {{ISBN|978-0-7425-3418-6}}; {{ISBN|0-7425-3418-9}}.
*Pérez, Rolando. Ed. Agorapoetics: Poetics after Postmodernism. Aurora: The Davies Group, Publishers. 2017. {{ISBN|978-1-934542-38-5}}.
* Powell, Jim (1998). "Postmodernism For Beginners" ({{ISBN|978-1-934389-09-6}})
* Sim, Stuart. (1999). "The Routledge critical dictionary of postmodern thought" ({{ISBN|0415923530}})
* Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont (1998) '']: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science'' ({{ISBN|0-312-20407-8}})
* Vattimo, Gianni (1989). ''The Transparent Society'' ({{ISBN|0-8018-4528-9}})
* ] (1994) ''Postmodern Times: A Christian Guide to Contemporary Thought and Culture'' ({{ISBN|0-89107-768-5}})
* ] (1996) ''The Killing of History: How Literary Critics and Social Theorists are Murdering our Past.'' New York: The Free Press.
* Woods, Tim, ''Beginning Postmodernism,'' Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999,(Reprinted 2002)({{ISBN|0-7190-5210-6}} Hardback,{{ISBN|0-7190-5211-4}} Paperback) .
* Stephen, Hicks (2014). "Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Expanded edition)", Ockham's Razor Publishing
{{Refend}}


==External links== === Citations ===
{{Reflist|30em|refs=}}

=== Bibliography ===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |title=Postmodernism |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/postmodernism |access-date=12 May 2019 |date=5 February 2015 |orig-date=1st pub. 2005 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Spring 2015 |series=sep-postmodernism |last1=Aylesworth |first1=Gary }}
* {{Cite book |last=Bell |first=Bernard Iddings |title=Postmodernism and Other Essays |publisher=Morehouse Publishing Company |year=1926 |location=Milwaukie}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Postmodern Dance |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Aesthetics |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195113075.001.0001/acref-9780195113075-e-0415 |year=2008 |access-date=7 June 2024 |editor-last=Kelly |editor-first=Michael |last1=Banes |first1=Sally |chapter=Postmodernism |isbn=978-0-19-511307-5 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bernstein |first1=Richard J. |title=The New Constellation: Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity |date=1992 |publisher=MIT Press}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Best |first1=Steven |last2=Kellner |first2=Douglas |title=Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations |publisher=Macmillan |year=1991 }}
* {{cite book |isbn=978-0415060110 |title=The Idea of the Postmodern: A History |last1=Bertens |first1=Johannes Willem |date=1995 |publisher=Psychology Press }}
*{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YPzGCgAAQBAJ&dq=bernard+bell+%22anglican+priest%22&pg=PT228 |isbn=9780813166209 |title=Russell Kirk: American Conservative |last=Birzer |first=Bradley J. |date=9 November 2015 |publisher=] |via=]}}
* {{cite book|isbn=978-0340807002 |title=A Glossary of Cultural Theory |last1=Brooker |first1=Peter |date=2003 |publisher=Arnold |edition=2nd}}
* {{cite book |isbn=978-0198794790 |chapter=postmodernism |title=A Dictionary of Critical Theory |last1=Buchanan |first1=Ian |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press }}
* {{cite book |isbn=978-0521648400 |title=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism |chapter=Introduction |last=Connor |first=Steven |editor-last1=Connor |editor-first1=Steven |pages= 1–19 |date=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}
* {{cite book |isbn=978-1118438817 |chapter=postmodernism |title=A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory |editor=Michael Payne and Jessica Rae Barbera |first1=Steven |last1= Connor |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}
* {{cite book |last1=Constable |first1=Catherine |editor1-last=Connor |editor1-first=Steven |title=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism |date=2004 |publisher=CUP |pages=43–61 |chapter=Postmodernism and Film}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Dear |first=Michael |last2=Flusty |first2=Steven |date=1998 |title=Postmodern Urbanism |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8306.00084 |journal=] |volume=88 |issue=1 |doi=10.1111/1467-8306.00084 |issn=0004-5608}}
* {{cite book |last1=Douzinas |first1=Costas |editor1-last=Connor |editor1-first=Steven |title=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism |date=2004 |publisher=CUP |pages=196–223 |chapter=Law and Justice in Postmodernity }}
* {{Cite web |last=Gantt |first=Edwin E. |date=Mar 22, 2024 |title=The Academy's Creed of Skepticism |url=https://publicsquaremag.org/media-education/education/the-academys-creed-of-skepticism/ |access-date=Oct 15, 2024 |website=Public Square Magazine}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Goodchild |first=Barry |year=1990 |title=Planning and the Modern/Postmodern Debate |journal=The Town Planning Review |volume=61 |issue=2 |pages=119–137 |doi=10.3828/tpr.61.2.q5863289k1353533 |jstor=40112887}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Jean François Lyotard |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition) |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/lyotard/ |year=2018 |access-date=7 June 2024 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |last1=Gratton |first1=Peter }}
* {{cite book|isbn=978-0-19-751862-5 |title=Science Wars: The Battle over Knowledge and Reality |last1=Goldman |first1=Steven L. |date=2021 |publisher=Oxford University Press }}
* {{cite web |last1=Grippe |first1=Edward |title=Richard Rorty (1931—2007) |url=https://iep.utm.edu/rorty/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=14 September 2024}}
* {{cite book | last1 = Habermas | first1 = Jürgen |translator=Frederick Lawrence | title = The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures | publisher = MIT Press | year = 1990}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hassan |first=Ihab |author-link=Ihab Hassan |title=The Postmodern Turn, Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture |publisher=] |date=1987 |page=12ff}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Hatuka |first1=Tali |last2=d'Hooghe |first2=Alexander |date=2007 |title=After Postmodernism: Readdressing the Role of Utopia in Urban Design and Planning |url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7b3789rv |journal=Places |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=20–27 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Postmodernism: Historical and Conceptual Overview |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Aesthetics |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195113075.001.0001/acref-9780195113075-e-0415 |year=2008 |access-date=7 June 2024 |editor-last=Kelly |editor-first=Michael |last1=Herwitz |first1=Daniel |chapter=Postmodernism |isbn=978-0-19-511307-5 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Hodder |first=Ian |title=Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology |date=2018 |publisher=Springer Reference |isbn=978-1-4419-0426-3 |editor-last=Smith |editor-first=Claire |location=New York |chapter=Post-processual Archaeology}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Irving |first=Allan |year=1993 |title=The Modern/Postmodern Divide and Urban Planning |journal=] |volume=62 |issue=4 |pages=474–487 |doi=10.3138/utq.62.4.474 |s2cid=144261041}}
* {{cite chapter|isbn=978-0816611737|chapter= Forward |title=The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge |last1=Jameson |first1=Frederic |date=1984 |publisher=University of Minnesota Press|pages=vii–xxi }}
* {{cite book|isbn=9781405100144 |title=Archaeological Theory: An Introduction |last1=Johnson |first1=Matthew |date=2010 |edition=2nd |publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Kellner |first1=Douglas |title=Jean Baudrillard |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition) |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/baudrillard/ |year=2020 |access-date=14 June 2024 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. }}
* {{cite web |last1=Kelly |first1=Mark |title=Michel Foucault: Political Thought |url=https://iep.utm.edu/fouc-pol/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=14 September 2024}}
* {{Cite book |last=Linn |first=Ray |title=A teacher's introduction to postmodernism |date=1996 |publisher=National Council of Teachers of English |isbn=978-0-8141-5009-2 |series=NCTE teacher's introduction series |location=Urbana, Ill. (1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, 61801-1096|url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED397451)}}
* {{cite book|isbn=978-0816611737 |title=The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge |last1=Lyotard |first1=Jean-François |date=1984 |publisher=U of Minnesota Press }}
* {{Cite book |last=Madsen |first=Deborah |title=Postmodernism: A Bibliography |publisher=Rodopi |year=1995 |location=Amsterdam; Atlanta, Georgia}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mellville |first1=Stephen |editor1-last=Connor |editor1-first=Steven |title=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism |date=2004 |publisher=CUP |pages=82-97 |chapter=Postmodernism and Art: Postmodernism Now and Again}}
* {{Cite book |last=Poster |first=Mark |year=1989 |title=Critical Theory and Poststructuralism: In Search of a Context |publisher=Cornell University Press}}
* {{cite web |title=postmodern (adjective & noun) |website=Oxford English Dictionary |url=https://www.oed.com/dictionary/postmodern_adj?tab=factsheet |access-date=9 February 2024 |date=2006}}
* {{Cite book |last=Poynor |first=Rick |url=https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300100341/no-more-rules/|title=No More Rules: Graphic Design and Postmodernism |publisher=] |year=2003 |isbn=0-300-10034-5 |location=New Haven, CT]}}
* {{cite web |last=Preucel |first=Robert W. |title=Post-processual Archaeology |date=2018-07-24 |work=Anthropology |url=https://oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0188.xml |access-date=2024-11-25 |publisher=Oxford University Press |language=en |doi=10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0188 |isbn=978-0-19-976656-7}}
* {{cite web |last1=Reynolds |first1=Jack |title=Jacques Derrida (1930—2004)|url=https://iep.utm.edu/jacques-derrida/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=23 September 2024}}
* {{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=Adam |title=Frederic Jameson |date=2000 |publisher=Routledge}}
* {{Cite book |last=Russello |first=Gerald J. |date=2007 |title=The Postmodern Imagination of Russell Kirk |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=98j0s2YVOSkC&q=bernard+bell+%22episcopal+priest%22&pg=PA181 |publisher=] |isbn=9780826265944 |via=]}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sim |first1=Stuart |editor1-last=Sim |editor1-first=Stuart |title=The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism |chapter=Postmodernism and Philosophy|date=2011a |pages=3–14 |edition=3}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sim |first1=Stuart |editor1-last=Sim |editor1-first=Stuart |title=The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism |chapter=Preface to the third edition: the modern, the postmodern and the post-postmodern|date=2011b |pages=vii–xiv |edition=3}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Simonsen |first=Kirsten |year=1990 |title=Planning on 'Postmodern' Conditions |journal=] |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=51–62 |doi=10.1177/000169939003300104 |jstor=4200779 |s2cid=144268594}}
* {{cite book |last1=Spencer |first1=Lloyd |editor1-last=Sim |editor1-first=Stuart |title=The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism |chapter=Postmodernism, Modernity and the Tradition of Dissent |date=2011 |pages=215–26 |edition=3}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Thompson |first=J. M. |date=1914 |title=Post-Modernism |url=https://archive.org/details/hibbertjournal12londuoft/page/733/mode/1up |journal=] |volume=XII |page=733 |number=4}}
* {{cite book |first=Arnold J. |last=Toynbee |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QGQ9AQAAIAAJ |title=A study of History |volume=5 |publisher=] |date=1961 |orig-date=1939 |page=43 |via=]}}
* {{cite book |last=Trigger |first=Bruce G. |author-link=Bruce Trigger |title=A History of Archaeological Thought |edition=Second |year=2007 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-521-60049-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofarchaeo0000trig}}
* {{cite book |last1=Vanhoozer |first1=Kevin J. |editor1-last=Vanhoozer |editor1-first=Kevin J. |title=The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology |date=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |pages=22–25 |chapter=Theology and the Condition of Postmodernity: A Report on Knowledge (of God)}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Welsch |first1=Wolfgang |title=International Postmodernism |last2=Sandbothe |first2=Mike |year=1997 |isbn=978-90-272-3443-8 |series=Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages |volume=XI |page=76 |chapter=Postmodernity as a Philosophical Concept |doi=10.1075/chlel.xi.07wel |doi-broken-date=7 December 2024 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n_Eqx2Gr1vUC&pg=PA76 |via=]}}
{{refend}}

== External links ==
{{Library resources box|by=no|onlinebooks=no|about=yes|wikititle=postmodernism}}
{{wikiquote}} {{wikiquote}}
{{Library resources box|by=no|onlinebooks=no|about=yes|wikititle=postmodernism}}
{{Wiktionary}} {{Wiktionary}}
{{Commons category}} {{Commons category}}
*
* *
* *
*
* by philosopher ]


{{Navboxes {{Navboxes
|list= |list=
{{Modernism}}
{{Human geography}}
{{Aesthetics}} {{Aesthetics}}
{{Human geography}}
{{Continental philosophy}}
{{Theories of History}}
}} }}

{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2012}}
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:14, 13 January 2025

Artistic, cultural, and theoretical movement This article is about the artistic, cultural, and theoretical movement. For the condition or state of being, see Postmodernity. For other uses, see Postmodernism (disambiguation).

Terry Farrell "SIS Building" (1994)
SIS Building (1994) by Terry Farrell: Detail view of the British intelligence service (MI6) headquarters in London, a "hulking, postmodern fortress" influenced by 1930s industrial modernist design and Mayan and Aztec temples.

Postmodernism is a term used to refer to a variety of artistic, cultural, and philosophical movements that claim to mark a break from modernism. They have in common the conviction that it is no longer possible to rely upon previous ways of depicting the world. Still, there is disagreement among experts about its more precise meaning even within narrow contexts.

The term began to acquire its current range of meanings in literary criticism and architectural theory during the 1950s–1960s. In opposition to modernism's alleged self-seriousness, postmodernism is characterized by its playful use of eclectic styles and performative irony, among other features. Critics claim it supplants moral, political, and aesthetic ideals with mere style and spectacle.

In the 1990s, "postmodernism" came to denote a general – and, in general, celebratory – response to cultural pluralism. Proponents align themselves with feminism, multiculturalism, and postcolonialism. Building upon poststructural theory, postmodern thought defined itself by the rejection of any single, foundational historical narrative. This called into question the legitimacy of the Enlightenment account of progress and rationality. Critics allege that its premises lead to a nihilistic form of relativism. In this sense, it has become a term of abuse in popular culture.

Definitions

"Postmodernism" is "a highly contested term", referring to "a particularly unstable concept", that "names many different kinds of cultural objects and phenomena in many different ways". It may be described simply as a general mood or Zeitgeist.

Although postmodernisms are generally united in their effort to transcend the perceived limits of modernism, "modernism" also means different things to different critics in various arts. Further, there are outliers on even this basic stance; for instance, literary critic William Spanos conceives postmodernism, not in period terms, but in terms of a certain kind of literary imagination so that pre-modern texts such as Euripides' Orestes or Cervantes' Don Quixote count as postmodern.

According to scholar Louis Menand, "Postmodernism is the Swiss Army knife of critical concepts. It's definitionally overloaded, and it can do almost any job you need done." From an opposing perspective, media theorist Dick Hebdige criticized the vagueness of the term, enumerating a long list of otherwise unrelated concepts that people have designated as postmodernism, from "the décor of a room" or "a 'scratch' video", to fear of nuclear armageddon and the "implosion of meaning", and stated that anything that could signify all of those things was "a buzzword".

All this notwithstanding, scholar Hans Bertens offers the following:

If there is a common denominator to all these postmodernisms, it is that of a crisis in representation: a deeply felt loss of faith in our ability to represent the real, in the widest sense. No matter whether they are aesthestic , epistemological, moral, or political in nature, the representations that we used to rely on can no longer be taken for granted.

In practical terms, postmodernisms share an attitude of skepticism towards grand explanations and established ways of doing things. In art, literature, and architecture, this attitude blurs boundaries between styles and genres, and encourages freely mixing elements, challenging traditional distinctions like high art versus popular art. In science, it emphasizes multiple ways of seeing things, and how our cultural and personal backgrounds shape how we see the world, making it impossible to be completely objective. In philosophy, education, history, politics, and many other fields, it encourages critical re-examination of established institutions and social norms, embracing diversity and breaking down disciplinary boundaries. Though these ideas weren't strictly new, postmodernism amplified them, using an often playful, at times deeply critical, attitude of pervasive skepticism to turn them into defining features.

Historical overview

Two broad cultural movements, modernism and postmodernism, emerged in response to profound changes in the Western world. The Industrial Revolution, urbanization, secularization, technological advances, two world wars, and globalization deeply disrupted the social order. Modernism emerged in the late 1800s, seeking to redefine fundamental truths and values through a radical rethinking of traditional ideas and forms across many fields. Postmodernism emerged in the mid-20th century with a skeptical perspective that questioned the notion of universal truths and reshaped modernist approaches by embracing the complexity and contradictions of modern life.

The term "postmodernism" first appeared in print in 1870, but it only began to enter circulation with its current range of meanings in the 1950s—60s.

Early appearances

The term "postmodern" was first used in 1870 by the artist John Watkins Chapman, who described "a Postmodern style of painting" as a departure from French Impressionism. Similarly, the first citation given by the Oxford English Dictionary is dated to 1916, describing Gus Mager as "one of the few 'post' modern painters whose style is convincing".

Episcopal priest and cultural commentator J. M. Thompson, in a 1914 article, uses the term to describe changes in attitudes and beliefs in the critique of religion, writing, "the raison d'être of Post-Modernism is to escape from the double-mindedness of modernism by being thorough in its criticism by extending it to religion as well as theology, to Catholic feeling as well as to Catholic tradition". In 1926, Bernard Iddings Bell, president of St. Stephen's College and also an Episcopal priest, published Postmodernism and Other Essays, which marks the first use of the term to describe an historical period following modernity. The essay criticizes lingering socio-cultural norms, attitudes, and practices of the Enlightenment. It is also critical of a purported cultural shift away from traditional Christian beliefs.

The term "postmodernity" was first used in an academic historical context as a general concept for a movement by Arnold J. Toynbee in a 1939 essay, which states that "Our own Post-Modern Age has been inaugurated by the general war of 1914–1918".

In 1942, the literary critic and author H. R. Hays describes postmodernism as a new literary form. Also in the arts, the term was first used in 1949 to describe a dissatisfaction with the modernist architectural movement known as the International Style.

Although these early uses anticipate some of the concerns of the debate in the second part of the 20th century, there is little direct continuity in the discussion. Just when the new discussion begins, however, is also a matter of dispute. Various authors place its beginnings in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.

Theoretical development

In the mid-1970s, the American sociologist Daniel Bell provided a general account of the postmodern as an effectively nihilistic response to modernism's alleged assault on the Protestant work ethic and its rejection of what he upheld as traditional values. The ideals of modernity, per his diagnosis, were degraded to the level of consumer choice. This research project, however, was not taken up in a significant way by others until the mid-1980s when the work of Jean Baudrillard and Fredric Jameson, building upon art and literary criticism, reintroduced the term to sociology.

Discussion about the postmodern in the second part of the 20th century was most articulate in areas with a large body of critical discourse around the modernist movement. Even here, however, there continued to be disagreement about such basic issues as whether postmodernism is a break with modernism, a renewal and intensification of modernism, or even, both at once, a rejection and a radicalization of its historical predecessor.

While discussions in the 1970s were dominated by literary criticism, these were supplanted by architectural theory in the 1980s. Some of these conversations made use of French poststructuralist thought, but only after these innovations and critical discourse in the arts did postmodernism emerge as a philosophical term in its own right.

In literary and architectural theory

The poet Robert Creeley in 1972

According to Hans Bertens and Perry Anderson, the Black Mountain poets Charles Olson and Robert Creeley first introduced the term "postmodern" in its current sense during the 1950s. Their stance against modernist poetry – and Olson's Heideggerian orientation – were influential in the identification of postmodernism as a polemical position opposed to the rationalist values championed by the Enlightenment project.

During the 1960s, this affirmative use gave way to a pejorative use by the New Left, who used it to describe a waning commitment among youth to the political ideals socialism and communism. The literary critic Irving Howe, for instance, denounced postmodern literature for being content to merely reflect, rather than actively attempt to refashion, what he saw as the "increasingly shapeless" character of contemporary society.

In the 1970s, this changed again, largely under the influence of the literary critic Ihab Hassan's large-scale survey of works that he said could no longer be called modern. Taking the Black Mountain poets an exemplary instance of the new postmodern type, Hassan celebrates its Nietzschean playfulness and cheerfully anarchic spirit, which he sets off against the high seriousness of modernism.

(Yet, from another perspective, Friedrich Nietzsche's attack on Western philosophy and Martin Heidegger's critique of metaphysics posed deep theoretical problems not necessarily a cause for aesthetic celebration. Their further influence on the conversation about postmodernism, however, would be largely mediated by French poststructuralism.)

If literature was at the center of the discussion in the 1970s, architecture was at the center in the 1980s. The architectural theorist Charles Jencks, in particular, connected the artistic avant-garde to social change in a way that captured attention outside of academia. Jenckes, much influenced by the American architect Robert Venturi, celebrated a plurality of forms and encourages participation and active engagement with the local context of the built environment. He presented this as in opposition to the "authoritarian style" of International Modernism.

The influence of poststructuralism

In the 1970s, postmodern criticism increasingly came to incorporate poststructuralist theory, particularly the deconstructive approach to texts most strongly associated with Jacques Derrida, who attempted to demonstrate that the whole foundationalist approach to language and knowledge was untenable and misguided. It is during this period that postmodernism came to be particularly equated with a kind of anti-representational self-reflexivity.

In the 1980s, some critics began to take an interest in the work of Michel Foucault. This introduced a political concern about social power-relations into discussions about postmodernism. This was also the beginning of the affiliation of postmodernism with feminism and multiculturalism. The art critic Craig Owens, in particular, not only made the connection to feminism explicit, but went so far as to claim feminism for postmodernism wholesale, a broad claim resisted by even many sympathetic feminists such as Nancy Fraser and Linda Nicholson.

Generalization

Although postmodern criticism and thought drew on philosophical ideas from early on, "postmodernism" was only introduced to the expressly philosophical lexicon by Jean-François Lyotard in his 1979 The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. This work served as a catalyst for many of the subsequent intellectual debates around the term.

By the 1990s, postmodernism had become increasingly identified with critical and philosophical discourse directly about postmodernity or the postmodern idiom itself. No longer centered on any particular art or even the arts in general, it instead turned to address the more general problems posed to society in general by a new proliferation of cultures and forms. It is during this period that it also came to be associated with postcolonialism and identity politics.

Around this time, postmodernism also began to be conceived in popular culture as a general "philosophical disposition" associated with a loose sort of relativism. In this sense, the term also started to appear as a "casual term of abuse" in non-academic contexts. Others identified it as an aesthetic "lifestyle" of eclecticism and playful self-irony.

In the arts

See also: Postmodern art
Andy Warhol's Campbell's Soup I (1968)

Postmodernism encompasses a wide range of artistic movements and styles. In visual arts, pop art, conceptual art, feminist art, video art, minimalism, and neo-expressionism are among the approaches recognized as postmodern. The label extends to diverse musical genres and artists: John Cage, Madonna, and punk rock all meet postmodern definitions. Literature, film, architecture, theater, fashion, dance, and many other creative disciplines saw postmodern expression. As an example, Andy Warhol's pop art across multiple mediums challenged traditional distinctions between high and low culture, and blurred the lines between fine art and commercial design. His work, exemplified by the iconic Campbell's Soup Cans series during the 1960s, brought the postmodernist sensibility to mainstream attention.

Criticism of postmodernist movements in the arts include objections to departure from beauty, the reliance on language for the art to have meaning, a lack of coherence or comprehensibility, deviation from clear structure, and consistent use of dark and negative themes.

Architecture

Michael Graves "Portland Building" (1982)
Portland Building (1982) by Michael Graves, considered the first built example of postmodern architecture in a tall building and "a seminal Postmodern work"
Interior of the Chapel at the Episcopal Academy near Newtown Square, PA by alumnus of the Academy architect Robert Venturi
Main article: Postmodern architecture

Scholarship regarding postmodernism and architecture is closely linked with the writings of critic-turned-architect Charles Jencks, beginning with lectures in the early 1970s and his essay "The Rise of Post-Modern Architecture" from 1975. His magnum opus, however, is the book The Language of Post-Modern Architecture, first published in 1977, and since running to seven editions (in which he famously wrote: "Modern architecture died in St. Louis, Missouri, on 15 July 1972 at 3:32 p.m. (or thereabouts) when the infamous Pruitt–Igoe scheme, or rather several of its slab blocks, were given the final coup de grâce by dynamite.").

Jencks makes the point that postmodernism (like modernism) varies for each field of art, and that for architecture it is not just a reaction to modernism but what he terms double coding: "Double Coding: the combination of Modern techniques with something else (usually traditional building) in order for architecture to communicate with the public and a concerned minority, usually other architects."

In their book, "Revisiting Postmodernism", Terry Farrell and Adam Furman argue that postmodernism brought a more joyous and sensual experience to the culture, particularly in architecture. For instance, in response to the modernist slogan of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe that "less is more", the postmodernist Robert Venturi rejoined that "less is a bore".

Dance

Main article: Postmodern dance

The term "postmodern dance" is most strongly associated with the Judson Dance Theater, located in New York's Greenwich Village during the 1960s and 1970s. Perhaps its most important principle is taken from the composer John Cage's efforts to break down the distinction between art and life, developed in particular by the American dancer and choreographer Merce Cunningham, Cage's partner. The Judson dancers " dance of its theatrical conventions such as virtuoso technique, fanciful costumes, complex storylines, and the traditional stage drew on everyday movements (sitting, walking, kneeling, and other gestures) to create their pieces, often performing them in ordinary spaces." Anna Halprin's San Francisco Dancers' Workshop, established in the 1950s to explore beyond the technical constraints of modern dance, pioneered ideas later developed at Judson; Halprin, Simone Forti, and Yvonne Rainer are considered "giants of the field".

The Judson collective included trained dancers, visual artists, filmmakers, writers, and composers, exchanging approaches and critiquing traditional dance, with a focus "more on the intellectual process of creating dance than the end result". The end of the 1970s saw a distancing from this analytical postmodern dance, and a return to the expression of meaning. In the 1980s and 1990s, dance began to incorporate other typically postmodern features such as the mixing of genres, challenging high–low cultural distinctions, and incorporating a political dimension.

Fashion

Dresses by Rei Kawakubo (1997)
Padded dresses by Rei Kawakubo (1997)

One manifestation of postmodernism in fashion explored alternatives to conventional concepts of elegance. Rei Kawakubo’s Spring/Summer 1997 collection featured "dresses asymmetrically padded with goose down, creating bumps in unexpected areas of the body". Issey Miyake’s 1985 dreadlocks hat "offered an immediate, yet impermanent, 'multi-culti' fashion experience". Vivienne Westwood took "an extremely polyglot approach", from early work with copies of 1950s clothes, to exploration of historic modes and cultural influences: in 1981, her first runway show, "Pirate", merged British history, 18th- and 19th-century dress, and African textile design, with a rap and ethnic music soundtrack.

Fashion design through the 1950s focused on catering to the upper class, emphasizing elegance, epitomized by French haute couture. The 1960s saw a dramatic shift, first inspired by the pop art movement; "throwaway" dresses made of paper came to be high fashion. Cristóbal Balenciaga, called "the master of us all" by Christian Dior and "the only couturier in the truest sense of the word" by Coco Chanel, abruptly closed his Paris couture house in 1968, saying only, "High fashion is mortally wounded." Others adapted to the new role of designer as interpreter of popular attitudes. Fashion editor Diana Vreeland noted, "Yves Saint Laurent has a fifty–fifty deal with the street. Half of the time he is inspired by the street and half of the time the street gets its style from Yves Saint Laurent."

The postmodern fashion sensibility appeared also through the subcultures of the 1960s and 1970s. Hippies, punks and other countercultural groups constructed their own nonconformist identities through choices in music, drugs, slang, and appearance. As these styles gained mainstream popularity, they lost their deeper meaning: "the adoption of surface attributes offers the frisson of rebellion without a commitment to a subcultural lifestyle."

In 2021, the Balenciaga couture house reopened; the following year, i-D magazine noted, "Haute Couture isn’t just surviving — it’s thriving". The observation highlighted how haute couture caters to the "0.001 per cent", while captivating the public and serving as a marketing mechanism for more commercially viable mass-produced lines. Drawing from many sources, postmodernism eclecticism has been integrated into everyday fashion, as evidenced by designer jeans, business casual, and elevated sportswear.

Film

Main article: Postmodern film

Postmodern film aims to subvert the mainstream conventions of narrative structure and characterization, and to test the audience's suspension of disbelief. Typically, such films also break down the cultural divide between high and low art and often upend typical portrayals of gender, race, class, genre, and time with the goal of creating something that does not abide by traditional narrative expression.

Certain key characteristics are used to separate the postmodern from modernist cinema and traditional narrative film. One is an extensive use of homage or pastiche, imitating the style or character of other artistic works. A second is meta-reference or self-reference, highlighting the relation of the image to other images in media and not to any kind of external reality. Viewers are reminded that the film itself is only a film, perhaps through the use of intertextuality, in which the film's characters reference other works of fiction. A third characteristic is stories that unfold out of chronological order, deconstructing or fragmenting time to emphasize the constructed nature of film. Another common element is a bridging of the gap between highbrow and lowbrow,. Contradictions of all sorts are crucial to postmodernism.

Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) has been widely studied as a prime example of postmodernism. The setting is a future dystopia where "replicants", enhanced android workers nearly indistinguishable from humans, are hunted down when they escape from their jobs. The film blurs boundaries between genres and cultures, and fuses disparate styles and periods: futuristic visuals "mingle with drab 1940s clothes and offices, punk rock hairstyles, pop Egyptian styles and oriental culture." The blending of film noir and science-fiction into tech noir illustrates the deconstruction of both cinema and genre. The film can also be seen as an example of major studios using the "mystique and cachet of the term 'postmodern' as a sales pitch", resulting in Hollywood movies that "demonstrate all the postmodern characteristics". From another perspective, "critical responses to Blade Runner fall on either side of a modern/postmodern line" – critical analysis from "modernist" and "postmodernist" approaches produce entirely different interpretations.

Graphic design

Early mention of postmodernism in graphic design appeared in the British magazine, Design, during the late 1960s. The discussion took a pragmatic if not entirely comfortable view of graphic design as engaging with the economic necessities of a changing world. Graphic design had the role of "active stylization of product surfaces (such as those of packaging and promotion)", engaging without moralizing with consumer desires. Close involvement with the industrial design process, and the potential need for strong visual identities from the "new giant corporations" and "internationalization", were examined. Editor Corin Hughes-Stanton concluded, "Post-Modernism' is an attitude that takes the form of a creative response to unfolding developments in the socio-economic sphere; it is a sign of active engagement rather than an academic retreat from its commercial and professional concerns."

In the 1970s, the American Cranbrook Academy of Art began to reject the modernism of the International Style and incorporate postmodern ideas through post-structuralist theory. By the 1980s, Cranbrook was considered to be at the forefront of design in the US. Mid-decade, the work of Roland Barthes and Hal Foster's The Anti-Aesthetic anthology took hold at the school. Co-director of design Katherine McCoy explained that, rather than applying specific theories to particular projects, Cranbrook was broadly drawing from the literature circulating within the art and architecture fields.

Writing in 2003 in No More Rules: Graphic Design and Postmodernism, Rick Poynor stated that, in the preceding 15 years, graphic designers had produced "some of the most challenging examples of postmodernism in the visual arts", yet this work had largely been overlooked by commentators in cultural studies. And, while some graphic designers, predominantly American, would claim the label, many associated with postmodernism "would reject the term vehemently". Regarding intellectual motivation, "graphic design as a profession has long had an aversion to theory and many of the key postmodernist texts are highly demanding, even for those who possess a basic sympathy for their arguments."

In a broad historical context, Graphic Design History: A Critical Guide (2008) situates postmodernism in a chronology of visual communication from prehistoric times to the digital age. "Retro, techno, punk, grunge, beach, parody, and pastiche were all conspicuous trends", each with its own "sites and venues, detractors and advocates." A shared attitude went beyond surface style to "raise profound questions about knowledge, history and power."

Literature

Main article: Postmodern literature

In 1971, the American literary theorist Ihab Hassan made "postmodernism" popular in literary studies with his influential book, The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature. According to scholar David Herwitz, American writers such as John Barth (who had controversially declared that the novel was "exhausted" as a genre), Donald Barthelme, and Thomas Pynchon responded in various ways to the stylistic innovations of Finnegans Wake and the late work of Samuel Beckett. Postmodern literature often calls attention to issues regarding its own complicated connection to reality. The postmodern novel plays with language, twisted plots, multiple narrators, and unresolved endings, unsettling the conventional idea of the novel as faithfully reflecting the world.

In Postmodernist Fiction (1987), Brian McHale details the shift from modernism to postmodernism, arguing that postmodern works developed out of modernism, moving from concern with what is there ("ontological dominant") to concern with how we can know it's there ("epistemological dominant"). McHale's "What Was Postmodernism?" (2007) follows Raymond Federman's lead in now using the past tense when discussing postmodernism. Others argue that postmodernism in literature utilizes compositional and semantic practices such as inclusivity, intentional indiscrimination, nonselection, and "logical impossibility."

Music

American singer-songwriter Madonna
Main articles: Postmodern music, Postmodern classical music, and Art pop

Postmodern influence extends across all areas of music; its accessibility to a general audience requires an understanding of references, irony and pastiche that varies widely between artists and their works. In popular music, Madonna, David Bowie and Talking Heads have been singled out by critics and scholars as postmodern icons. The belief that art music – serious, classical music – holds higher cultural and technical value than folk and popular traditions, lost influence under postmodern analysis, as musical hybrids and crossovers attracted scholarly attention.

Across musical traditions, postmodernism can be identified through several core characteristics: genre mixing; irony, humor, and self-parody: "surface" exploration with less concern for formal structure than in modernist approaches; and a return to tonality. This represents a loss of authority of the Eurocentric perspective on music and the rise of world music as influenced by postmodern values. Composers took different routes: some returned to traditional modes over experimentation, others challenged the authority of dominant musical structures, others intermingled disparate sources.

The composer Jonathan Kramer has written that avant-garde musical compositions (which some would consider modernist rather than postmodernist) "defy more than seduce the listener, and they extend by potentially unsettling means the very idea of what music is." In the 1960s, composers such as Terry Riley, Henryk Górecki, Bradley Joseph, John Adams, Steve Reich, Philip Glass, Michael Nyman, and Lou Harrison reacted to the perceived elitism and dissonant sound of atonal academic modernism by producing music with simple textures and relatively consonant harmonies, whilst others, most notably John Cage challenged the prevailing narratives of beauty and objectivity common to modernism.

In 2023, music critic Andy Cush described Talking Heads as "New York art-punks" whose "blend of nervy postmodernism and undeniable groove made them one of the defining rock bands of the late 1970s and ’80s." Media theorist Dick Hebdige, examining the "Road to Nowhere" music video in 1989, said the group "draw eclectically on a wide range of visual and aural sources to create a distinctive pastiche or hybrid 'house style' which they have used since their formation in the mid-1970s deliberately to stretch received (industrial) definitions of what rock/pop/video/Art/ performance/audience are", calling them "a properly postmodernist band." According to lead vocalist/guitarist/songwriter David Byrne, commenting in 2011, "Anything could be mixed and matched – or mashed up, as is said today – and anything was fair game for inspiration.”

Avant-garde academics labelled American singer Madonna a "personification of the postmodern" and created a sub-discipline of cultural studies known as Madonna studies. Her self-aware constructs of gender and identity, and classic film references in music videos for “Material Girl” (1984) and “Express Yourself" (1989), made her a favorite of cultural theorists, who saw her as "enacting postmodernist models of subjectivity." Madonna was seen to embody fragmentation, pastiche, retrospection, anti-foundationalism and de-differentiation; her "subversion of the subversion of the subversion of the male gaze" in the "Material Girl' video was analyzed. Outside academia, Anglican bishop Graham Cray said she is "perhaps the most visible example of what is called post-modernism"; novelist Martin Amis described her as "perhaps the most postmodern personage on the planet".

Sculpture

"Trowel" (1976) by Claes Oldenburg.

Sculptor Claes Oldenberg, at the forefront of the pop art movement, declared in 1961: "I am for an art that is political-erotical-mystical … I am for an art that embroils itself with everyday crap and still comes out on top." That year, he opened The Store in a dime store area of New York's Lower East Side, where he blurred the line between art and commerce by producing and selling brightly painted plaster replicas of hamburgers and cans of soda, dresses, underwear, and other everyday objects: "Museum in b concept equals store in mine". Oldenburg was one of the most recognizable sculptors identified with postmodernism, a group that included Jeff Koons, Eva Hesse, Louise Bourgeois, Anish Kapoor, Damien Hirst, Rachel Whiteread, and Richard Serra.

Theater

Main article: Postmodern theatre

Postmodern theater emerged as a reaction against modernist theater. Most postmodern productions are centered on highlighting the fallibility of definite truth, instead encouraging the audience to reach their own individual understanding. Essentially, thus, postmodern theater raises questions rather than attempting to supply answers.

In philosophy

Main article: Postmodern philosophy See also: Criticism of postmodernism

Poststructuralist precursors

Main article: Poststructuralism

In the 1970s, a disparate group of French theorists – often grouped together as "poststructuralists" – developed a critique of modern philosophy with roots discernible in Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger's critique of metaphysics. Although few themselves relied upon the term, they became known to many as postmodern theorists. Poststructuralism is sometimes treated as distinct from or a subcategory of postmodernism and sometimes is treated as having been subsumed by postmodernism. While their ideas exerted a great influence on debates about the postmodern, the French poststucturalists themselves did not intervene or attempt to provide their own definitions of the postmodern.

Poststructuralists, like structuralists, start from the assumption that people's identities, values, and economic conditions determine each other as parts of a common whole, rather than having intrinsic properties that can be understood in isolation. While structuralism explores how meaning is produced by a set of essential relationships in an overarching quasi-linguistic system, poststructuralism accepts this premise, but rejects the assumption that such systems can ever be fixed or centered. Instead, poststructuralists stress the various ways that cultural structures are produced in history. They also emphasize how meaning is generated, rather than discovered, and they replace the traditional concept of "representation" (according to which meaning is determined by the objected signified) to focus instead upon the elastic potentialities of language to generate new meanings.

Politically, all of them began with Marxist sympathies, became disillusioned, and eventually opposed the French Communist Party and its application of theory. The chaos following the briefly successful communist revolution of May '68 in France was a particular point of rupture.

Jacques Derrida and deconstruction

Deconstruction is a practice in philosophy, literary criticism, and close reading developed by Jacques Derrida. It is based on the assumption, which it seeks to validate by textual analysis, that any text harbors inherent points of "undecidability" that undermine any stable meaning intended by the author. The process of writing inevitably, he aims to show, reveals suppressed elements, challenging the oppositions that are thought to sustain the text. Nevertheless, Derrida does not wish to do away with such concepts as "origin" or "truth". What he challenges is any claim to finality. Such metaphysical concepts are, as he puts it, "under erasure", and this, he says, makes deconstructive reading a kind of "double play".

From this perspective, Derrida argues that the practice of metaphysics in the Western tradition depends upon hierarchies and orders of subordination within various dualisms that it does not acknowledge. It prioritizes presence and purity over the contingent and complicated, dismissing them as aberrations irrelevant to philosophical analysis. In essence, according to Derrida, metaphysical thought prioritizes one side of an opposition while ignoring or marginalizing the alternative. He uses the term metaphysics of presence to describe the foundationalist approach to knowledge, taking himself to have demonstrated that we do not have unmediated access to reality. This project of deconstructing and challenging the assumptions of modern philosophy was influential for many postmodern thinkers.

Michel Foucault on power relations

French philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault argued that power operates according to the logics of social institutions that have become unmoored from the intentions of any actual individuals. Individuals, according to Foucault, are both products and participants in these dynamics. Among other strategies, he employed a Nietzsche-inspired "genealogical method" to analyze power-relations across their historical permutations.

Both Foucault's political orientation and the consistency of his positions continue to be debated among critics and defenders alike. Nevertheless, Foucault's political works share two common elements: a historical perspective and a discursive methodology. He analyzed social phenomena in historical contexts and focused on how they have evolved over time. Additionally, he employed the study of written texts, usually academic texts, as the material for his inquiries. In this way, Foucault sought to understand how the historical formation of discourses has shaped contemporary political thinking and institutions.

Gilles Deleuze on productive difference

The work of Gilles Deleuze developed a concept of difference as a productive mechanism, rather than as a merely negative phenomenon. He advocated for a critique of reason that emphasizes sensibility and feeling over rational judgment. Following Nietzsche, Deleuze argued that philosophical critique is an encounter between thought and what forces it into action, and that this requires training, discipline, inventiveness, and even a certain "cruelty". He believed that thought cannot activate itself, but needs external forces to awaken and move it. Art, science, and philosophy can provide such activation through their transformative and experimental nature.

Jean Baudrillard on hyperreality

Although trained in sociology, Jean Baudrillard worked across many disciplines. Drawing upon some of the technical vocabulary of the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, Baudrillard argued that social production had shifted from creating real objects to instead producing signs and symbols. This system of symbolic exchange, detached from the real, constitutes hyperreality. In the words of one commentator, "the hyperreal is a system of simulation that simulates itself."

Postmodernity, Baudrillard said, is the condition in which the domain of reality has become so heavily mediated by signs as to become inaccessible in itself, leaving us entirely in the domain of the simulacra, images that bear no relation to anything outside of themselves. This hyperreality is presented as the terminal stage of simulation, where signs and images become entirely self-referential.

Baudrillard's vision of postmodernity has been described as "apocalyptic", and scholars disagree about whether his later works are intended as science fiction or truthful theoretical claims. Another interpretation is that Baudrillard deliberately adopts the role of agent provocateur.

A crisis of legitimacy

At the center of the intellectual debate about postmodernism is the question of what, if anything, grounds theory. What establishes that a statement is true or that an action is right? This foundational debate is most prominently on display in Habermas's rejoinder to Lyotard's anti-foundational, postmodern challenge to Habermas's own foundation version of modernism.

The Postmodern Condition

Philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard, photo by Bracha L. Ettinger, 1995

Jean-François Lyotard is credited with being the first to use the term "postmodern" in a philosophical context. This appeared in his 1979 The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. In this influential work, Lyotard provided the following definition: "Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity towards metanarratives".

By "metanarratives", Lyotard meant such overarching narrative frameworks as those provided by Christianity, G. W. F. Hegel, and Karl Marx that unite and determine our basic sense of our place and significance in the world. It was his early disillusionment with his early Marxism that would later be generalized into the universal claim about metanarratives. In a society with no unifying narrative, he argued, we are left with heterogeneous, group-specific narratives (or "language games", as adopted from Ludwig Wittgenstein) with no universal perspective from which to adjudicate among them.

According to Lyotard, this introduced a general crisis of legitimacy, a theme he adopts from the philosopher Jürgen Habermas, whose theory of communicative rationality Lyotard rejected. While he was particularly concerned in that report with the way that this insight undermined claims of scientific objectivity, Lyotard's argument undermines the entire principle of transcendent legitimization. Instead, proponents of a language game must make the case for their legitimacy with reference to such considerations as efficiency or practicality. Far from celebrating the apparently relativistic consequences of this argument, however, Lyotard focused much of his subsequent work on how links among games could be established, particularly with respect to ethics and politics.

The philosophical criticism of Jürgen Habermas

The philosopher Jürgen Habermas, a prominent critic of philosophical postmodernism, argued in his 1985 work The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity that postmodern thinkers were caught in a performative contradiction, more specifically, that their critiques of modernity rely on concepts and methods that are themselves products of modern reason.

Habermas criticized these thinkers for their rejection of the subject and their embrace of experimental, avant-garde strategies. He asserted that their critiques of modernism ultimately lead to a longing for the very subject they seek to dismantle. Habermas also took issue with postmodernists' leveling of the distinction between philosophy and literature. He argued that such rhetorical strategies undermine the importance of argument and communicative reason.

Habermas's critique of postmodernism set the stage for much of the subsequent debate by clarifying some of its key underlying issues. According to scholar Gary Aylesworth – against those who would dismiss postmodernist discourse as simple nonsense – the fact that Habermas was "able to read postmodernist texts closely and discursively testifies to their intelligibility". His engagement with their ideas has led some postmodern philosophers, following Lyotard, to similarly engage with Habermas's criticisms.

Frederic Jameson's Marxist rejoinder

The appearance of linguistic relativism also inspired an extensive rebuttal by the Marxist critic Fredric Jameson. Building upon the theoretical foundations laid out by the Marxist economist Ernst Mandel and observations in the early work of the sociologist Jean Baudrillard, Jameson developed his own conception of the postmodern as "the cultural logic of late capitalism" in the form of an enormous cultural expansion into an economy of spectacle and style, rather than the production of goods. According to Jameson, because the postmodernism is result of political and historical circumstances that make up the social world, it is not something that can be simply embraced or condemned. Instead, it must be analyzed and understood so that we may confront the world as it is.

Jameson categorizes a variety of features of the postmodern. One is the elision of the distinction between high culture and mass culture. Also, because of our loss of a unified "bourgeois ego", subjectivity is less focused, and we experience what he terms a "waning of the affect", an emotional disengagement from the social world. This loss of significance leads to what he calls "depthlessness", a difficulty in getting beneath the surfaces of cultural objects to find any deeper significance than is offered directly to the subject. Reduced to a set of styles, history looses its political force. This phenomenon finds expression, for instance, in the shift from "parody", in which styles are mixed in the interest of making a point, to "pastiche", in which styles are mixed together without attention to their original contexts.

Richard Rorty's neopragmatism

Richard Rorty was an American philosopher known for his linguistic form of neopragmatism. Initially attracted to analytic philosophy, Rorty later rejected its representationalism. His major influences, rather than the poststructuralists, include Charles Darwin, Hans Georg Gadamer, G. W. F. Hegel, and Martin Heidegger.

Rorty challenged the notion of a mind-independent, language-independent reality. He argued that language is a tool used to adapt to the environment and achieve desired ends. This naturalistic approach led him to abandon the traditional quest for a privileged mental power that allows direct access to things-in-themselves.

Instead, Rorty advocated for a focus on imaginative alternatives to present beliefs rather than the pursuit of independently grounded truths. He believed that creative, secular humanism, free from authoritarian assertions about truth and goodness, is the key to a better future. Rorty saw his neopragmatism as a continuation of the Enlightenment project, aiming to demystify human life and replace traditional power relations with those based on tolerance and freedom.

In other fields

Postmodernism is more fully understood by observing its effects in such diverse fields as law, education, urban planning, religious studies, politics and many others. Its influence varies widely across disciplines, reflecting the extent to which postmodern theories and ideas have been integrated into actual practices.

Anthropology

Main article: Postmodernist anthropology

Postmodern theory in anthropology originated in the 1960s, alongside the literary postmodern movement. Reflexivity is central to postmodern anthropology, a continuous practice of critical self-awareness that attempts to address the subjectivity inherent in interpretation. Other key practices are an emphasis on including the perspectives of the people being studied; cultural relativism, which considers values and beliefs within their cultural context; skepticism towards the notion that science can produce objective and universally valid knowledge; and rejection of grand narratives or theories that attempt to explain other cultures.

Anthropologists working in a postmodern vein seek to dissect, interpret and write cultural critiques, analyzing of cultural texts and practices, rather than relying on empirical observation. The issue of subjectivity is a concern: as ethnographies are influenced by the perspective of the author, the question arises in the study of individual cultures as to whether the author's opinions should be considered scientific. Clifford Geertz, considered a founding member of postmodernist anthropology, holds that, "anthropological writings are themselves interpretations, and second and third order ones to boot. (By definition, only a 'native' makes first order ones: it's his culture.)" In the 21st century, some anthropologists use a form of standpoint theory, which prioritizes the perspectives of the subject over the perspective of the observer in cultural interpretation.

Archaeology

Main article: Post-processual archaeology

Significant postmodern influence is found in post-processual archaeology, a movement in archaeological theory that emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations and the importance of understanding the social environment. Post-processualism questions the assumptions of processual archaeology to develop "a more humanist approach committed to understanding people and practices, social relationships and organizations, and ideology and power." According to Bruce G. Trigger, the discipline can be described as evolving through three periods. From 19th century, the culture-historical approach relied on examination of the objects and architecture of material culture. During the 1960s, the processual movement believed that rigorous use of the scientific method, for example, analyzing the spatial distribution of objects in a settlement, allowed for conclusions that went beyond the limits of the archaeological record. The New Archaeology, as it was also known, dominating the Anglophone world in the 1970s.

The post-processual movement originated in the United Kingdom during the late 1970s and early 1980s, pioneered by archaeologists such as Ian Hodder, Daniel Miller, Christopher Tilley, and Peter Ucko. They were responding to three central influences: Marxist-inspired social anthropology that developed in France in the 1960s, postmodernism, and the new cultural anthropology that emerged in the US. The movement came to consist of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions," with a common emphasis on understanding human behavior and agency through archeological materials. The multiple lines of inquiry included "discussions of power and ideology, feminism, shifts to and from the notion that material culture can be read as a text, phenomenology, accounts of agency, landscape, the body, memory, materiality, the links between archaeology and heritage, indigenous rights, and ethics."

Although itself no longer a central topic of academic debate, post-processualism's practical influence remains significant. In the U.S., post-processualism is often as seen as accompanying the processual approach; in the UK, post-processual archaeology is often seen as dominant and in opposition to other theoretical movements. In Latin America and parts of Spain, post-processualism has been integrated with the already dominant Marxist sociopolitical theoretical debate. Elsewhere in the world, the post-processual perspective has often contributed to postcolonial, indigenous, and political movements in archaeology.

Feminism

Main article: Postmodern feminism

Postmodern feminism mixes postmodern theory and French feminism that rejects a universal female subject. The goal is to destabilize the patriarchal norms entrenched in society that have led to gender inequality. Essentialism, philosophy, and universal truths are opposed, in favor of embracing the differences that exist amongst women to demonstrate that not all women are the same. Applying universal truths to all women in a society minimizes individual experience; ideas displayed as the norm in society stem from masculine notions of how women should be portrayed.

Postmodern feminism seeks to analyze notions that have led to gender inequality, and attempts to promote equality through critiquing logocentrism, supporting multiple discourses, deconstructing texts, and seeking to promote subjectivity. This approach is not readily accepted by all feminists—some believe postmodern thought undermines the attacks that feminist theory attempts to create, while other feminists are in favor of the union.

Law

Main article: Postmodern law

In response to the perceived shortcomings of legal formalism and positivism, postmodern legal scholars developed several new approaches to address both formal and ethical issues in jurisprudence. In particular, they emphasize the inequalities introduced to the legal system by such matters as race, gender, and economic status.

Marketing

Main article: Postmodern marketing

Postmodernism in marketing focuses on customized experiences where broad market generalizations are no longer applied. According to academic Stephen Brown, "Marketers know about consumers, consumers know about marketers, marketers know consumers know about marketers, and consumers know marketers know consumers know about marketers." Brown, writing in 1993, stated that the postmodern approach in many ways rejects attempts to impose order and work in silos. Instead marketers should work collectively with "artistic" attributes of intuition, creativity, spontaneity, speculation, emotion, and involvement.

A 2020 study in the Journal of Business Research investigated the reported transition from postmodernism to post-postmodernism, those "changing social conditions that lead the consumer to consume in a particular manner". Song lyrics were selected from Madonna (postmodern), Taylor Swift (post-postmodern), and Lady Gaga as a transitional example. Five postmodern characteristics consistently found in marketing literature were compared to their post-postmodern counterparts: anti-foundationalism to rewriting; dedifferentiation to redifferentiation; fragmentation to reengagement; reversal of production and consumption to rebalancing of production and consumption; and hyperreality to alternative reality. Postmodernism, it finds, "remains vibrant, re-inventive, and calls for its demise may be somewhat overblown." Swift's success "suggests a significant shift from deconstructive to reconstructive positions regarding the self and its surroundings", noting that her "post-postmodern engagement, enthusiasm and sincerity" appeared to be "somewhat superficial, sociopathic, and couched in fabulation."

Psychology

Main article: Postmodern psychology

In 1992, under the headline, "A New Breed of Psychologists Says There’s No One Answer to the Question 'Who Am I?'", the Los Angeles Times reported on "a group of increasingly influential psychologists – postmodern psychologists seems to be the name that is sticking", who had come to the conclusion that "the American conception of an isolated, unified self" does not exist. People are composed of many different selves, constructed for different situations. In this way, postmodernism challenges the modernist view of psychology as the science of the individual, in favor of seeing humans as a cultural/communal product, dominated by language rather than by an inner self.

In 2001, Kenneth Gergen, a pioneer in postmodern psychological theory, identified "emphasis on the individual mind, an objectively knowable world, and language as carrier of truth" as the cornerstones of traditional modernist psychology. He noted criticism of these assumptions coming from "every quarter of the humanities and the sciences", and the emergence of a psychology in which "colonialist universalism is replaced by a global conversation among equals". He also considered the "strong critical reservation", including the realist argument that a socially constructed world cannot negate a clearly observable objective reality; the claim of incoherence, wherein postmodernism denies truth and objectivity while simultaneously making truth claims; and its moral relativism, which fails to take a principled ethical stand. Ultimately, he concluded that psychology's future is "hanging in the balance".

In 2021, psychologist Jan Smedslund discussed how psychology tried for decades to emulate the natural sciences and address unpredictable individual behavior. He described how the dominant methodology came to rely exclusively on statistical analysis of group level data and average findings, whereby it "lost contact with the psychological processes going on in individual persons." He advocated for abandoning the natural science approach that had "led into a clearly discernible blind alley."

In 2024, American psychology professor Edwin Gantt wrote that psychology remains in a state of continual struggle "to decide whether its true intellectual home is to be found among the humanities, especially philosophy and literature, or among the STEM disciplines." He finds psychology "a key site where the intellectual tug-of-war between modernism and postmodernism plays itself out in academia."

Urban planning

Modernism sought to design and plan cities that followed the logic of the new model of industrial mass production; reverting to large-scale solutions, aesthetic standardization, and prefabricated design solutions. This approach was found to have eroded urban living by its failure to recognize differences and aim towards homogeneous landscapes. Jane Jacobs's 1961 book The Death and Life of Great American Cities, was a sustained critique of urban planning as it had developed within modernism, and played a major role in turning public opinion against modernist planners, notably Robert Moses.

Postmodern urban planning involves theories that embrace and aim to create diversity, elevating uncertainty, flexibility, and change, and rejecting utopianism while embracing a utopian way of thinking and acting. The postmodernity of "resistance" seeks to deconstruct modernism, a critique of the origins without necessarily returning to them. As a result, planners are much less inclined to lay a firm or steady claim to there being one single "right way" of engaging in urban planning and are more open to different styles and ideas of "how to plan".

This postmodern reaction is often compared with the modernist Chicago School, the then dominant movement founded at the University of Chicago in the 1920s. Sociologist Ernest Burgess's prominent concentric circle model depicted urban areas as a series of concentric functional zones that sorted population groups. It proposed a central business core, circled by transitional immigrant and working class areas, then by more affluent outer commuter rings. In contrast, for example, the postmodernist Los Angeles School, primarily associated with the University of California at LA, viewed Los Angeles as a prototypical postmodern city, a "multi-nucleated megacity encompassing hundreds of municipalities", sprawling and centerless. The LA School analysis emphasized the global-local connection, pervasive social fragmentation, and a "reterritorialization of the urban process in which hinterland organizes the center (in direct contradiction to the Chicago model)".

A review of postmodern urbanism literature, published in 2018 in the Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, examined coverage of style, epoch, and method, noting a general lack of cohesive definition, and the use of questionable interpretation to form conceptual statements. The review concluded that as a theoretical construct, postmodern urbanism "is relevant to planning and design theory insofar as it rejects modernist 'rational' planning." However, given that urban planning and design are grounded in practice, postmodern theoretical ideas offer "little insight that professionals can use."

Theology

Main article: Postmodern theology

The postmodern theological movement interprets Christian theology in light of postmodern theory and various forms of post-Heideggerian thought, using approaches such as poststructuralism, phenomenology, and deconstruction to question fixed interpretations, explore the role of lived experience, and uncover hidden textual assumptions and contradictions. The movement emerged in the 1980s and 1990s when a handful of philosophers who took philosopher Martin Heidegger as a common point of departure began publishing books engaging with Christian theology.

Theologian Kevin J. Vanhoozer combines and expands on other scholarly classifications to present seven types of postmodern theology: postliberal, postmetaphysical, deconstructive, reconstructive, feminist, Anglo-American postmodernity, and radical orthodoxy. He notes that the typology should be considered "provisional and fallible not entirely arbitrary", having met two main criteria: each is an approach taken by more than one theologian, and each "believes itself to be responding to, rejecting, or passing through modernity, not inhabiting it."

Ongoing influence

See also: Modernism and Metamodernism

Since the late 1990s, there has been a growing sentiment in popular culture and in academia that postmodernism "has gone out of fashion". Others argue that postmodernism is dead in the context of current cultural production.

The connection between postmodernism, posthumanism, and cyborgism has led to a challenge to postmodernism, for which the terms Post-postmodernism and postpoststructuralism were first coined in 2003.

In "White Noise/White Heat, or Why the Postmodern Turn in Rock Music Led to Nothing but Road" (2004), literary critic and professor of English and comparative literature Larry McCaffery reexamined his rock music essay, "White Noise", published in the journal American Book Review in 1990. He noted "the almost casual assurance" of its definition of postmodernism, and the "easy assumption throughout that it is possible to draw analogies about the 'innovative features' of fundamentally different media, such as music and fiction." From his 2004 perspective, he says, "If I were writing such an essay today I would omit 'postmodernism' entirely because I no longer believe that I (or anyone else for that matter) can articulate with any degree of coherence or specificity what 'postmodernism' is, or was, what it's supposed to mean, or, indeed, whether it ever existed at all."

In 2011, Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990, at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, was billed as "the first in-depth survey of art, design and architecture of the 1970s and 1980s". The first of three "broadly chronological" sections focused mainly on architecture, "the discipline in which the ideas of postmodernism first emerged", as well as certain designers. The second section featured 1980s design, art, music, fashion, performance, and club culture. The final section examined "the hyper-inflated commodity culture of the 1980s", focusing on money as "a source of endless fascination for artists, designers and authors". A review in the journal Design Issues noted the "daunting prospect" of critiquing an exhibition "on what might be considered the most slippery, indefinable 'movement'", and wondered what the curators must have felt: "One reviewer thought it 'a risky curatorial undertaking,' and even the curators themselves admit it could be seen as 'a fool's errand.'"

Writing in 2022, Steven Connor argues that, despite continuing reports of its death or imminent demise, postmodernism has instead undergone a kind of disappearance into our culture by way of assimilation. He notes there is little that can now be called postmodern style because "the clashing or commingling of styles has become entirely routine at all levels of culture." The energizing antagonism between high and low culture has been "pestled into a tepid porridge." And the general postmodern condition is now "universal, irreversible and metastable, embodied above all in the massive increase in digitally mediated information technologies." According to Connor, postmodernism in the 2020s is a sensibility that has been integrated into everyday life, having been subject to a considerable degree of shifting, perhaps temporarily, from irony, pluralism and ambivalence to urgency, indignation and reductive absolutism.

A small group of critics has put forth a range of theories that aim to describe culture or society in the alleged aftermath of postmodernism, most notably Raoul Eshelman (performatism), Gilles Lipovetsky (hypermodernity), Nicolas Bourriaud (altermodern), and Alan Kirby (digimodernism, formerly called pseudo-modernism). None of these new theories or labels have so far gained very widespread acceptance.

See also

Postmodernism
Preceded by Modernism
Postmodernity
Fields
Reactions
Theory
Culture and politics
  • Defamiliarization – Artistic technique of presenting common things in an unfamiliar or strange way
Religion
History
  • Second modernity – Industrial society transformed into a more reflexive network society or information society
Opposed by
  • Altermodern – term for art that reacts against standardisation and commercialismPages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
  • Metamodernism – Movement that emerged from and reacts to postmodernism
  • Remodernism – Present-day modernist philosophical movement

References

Notes

  1. A sampling from other scholars: It is "diffuse, fragmentary, multi-dimensional". Critics have described it as "an exasperating term" and claim that its indefinability is "a truism". Put otherwise, postmodernism is "several things at once". It has no single definition, and the term does not name any single unified phenomenon, but rather many diverse phenomena: "postmodernisms rather than one postmodernism".
  2. The incorporation of deconstruction into postmodernism, while common in the U.S., was resisted in the U.K. Furthermore, the more general category of poststructuralism itself was a largely American category, foreign to the disparate French thinkers upon whom it was imposed.
  3. English translation, 1984.
  4. For instance, contrast Poster 1989, p. 4 with Sim 2011b, pp. ix–x.
  5. Poster 1989, (p. 4) offers as linguistic examples écriture (Derrida), discourse/practice (Foucault), code (Baudrillard), and phrases and le différend (Lyotard). On signification more generally, Best & Kellner 1991, (p. 21) present dissemination (Derrida), desire (Deleuze and Guattari), intensities (Lyotard), semiurgy (Baudrillard), and power (Foucault).
  6. Le métarécit, sometimes also grand récit, "grand narrative"
  7. This volume is an extension of his 1980 speech "Modernity—An Unfinished Project", published the next year as "Modernity versus Postmodernity". Even though Lyotard is not treated directly, Habermas describes the work as an explicit response to Lyotard's challenges to the theory of communicative rationality.

Citations

  1. Jones, Nick (2 January 2018). "New Digs, Old Digs: Vauxhall Cross, Whitehall, and the London of Craig's Bond". Journal of Popular Film and Television. 46 (1): 25. doi:10.1080/01956051.2018.1423206. ISSN 0195-6051.
  2. Baker, Phil. "SIS/MI6 Building". Building Centre. Retrieved 2 January 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ Buchanan 2018.
  4. Bertens 1995, p. 11.
  5. ^ Connor 2013, p. 567.
  6. Spencer 2011, p. 217.
  7. Herwitz 2008, Historical and Conceptual Overview.
  8. ^ Bertens 1995, p. 3.
  9. Aylesworth 2015, Introduction.
  10. Brooker 2003, p. 204.
  11. Vanhoozer 2003, p. 3.
  12. Connor 2004, p. 17.
  13. ^ Bertens 1995, pp. 4–5.
  14. Bertens 1995, p. 46.
  15. Menand, Louis (15 February 2009). "Saved from Drowning". The New Yorker. Retrieved 5 November 2024. This is partly because, like many terms that begin with "post," it is fundamentally ambidextrous. Postmodernism can mean, "We're all modernists now. Modernism has won." Or it can mean, "No one can be a modernist anymore. Modernism is over."{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. Hebdige, Dick (2006). "Postmodernism and "the other side"". In Storey, John (ed.). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A reader. London: Pearson Education.
  17. Bertens 1995, p. 10.
  18. Brown, Stephen (2006). "Recycling Postmodern Marketing". The Marketing Review. 6 (3): 214 – via SSRN. in certain respects the most straightforward of grasping the postmodern is to eschew the idea that it is an 'it'. ... Postmodernism, rather, is better regarded as an attitude, a feeling, a mood, a sensibility, an orientation, a way of looking at the world – a way of looking askance at the world.
  19. Jin, Huimin (September 2023). "Postmodernism in the 21st Century Pros and Cons". Journal of East-West Thought. 13 (3): 19 – via ScholarWorks. hen we talk about what postmodernism is, we are not talking about any individual theorist titled postmodern, but those common characteristics he or she shares with a community of similarly titled theorists. In this sense, postmodernism is not peculiar to any individual theorist but refers to a trend of thought, a climate, and an atmosphere to which none is immune,.
  20. Hart, James D.; Martin, Wendy; Hinrichs, Danielle, eds. (2020). "postmodernism". The Concise Oxford Companion to American Literature (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780191872112.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-187211-2.
  21. Heise, Ursula K. (2004), Connor, Steven (ed.), "Science, technology, and postmodernism", The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, Cambridge Companions to Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–167, doi:10.1017/ccol0521640520.008, ISBN 978-0-521-64052-7, retrieved 13 November 2024, These critiques do not form a homogeneous body of argument. They differ substantially and sometimes contradict one another .. Nevertheless, certain basic lines of reasoning recur frequently enough ... that they can convey the conceptual backbone of many postmodernist critiques of science.
  22. Gantt 2024 "Rather than a clearly defined system of thought, fixed body of ideas, or unified movement and set of agreed-upon critical methods and techniques, however, postmodernism is perhaps 'best understood as a state of mind, a critical, self-referential posture, and style, a different way of seeking and working.' Indeed, a persistent rejection of scientific methodologies, moral understandings, universal truth, and reductive rationalistic explanation is a hallmark of the postmodern response to ... scientistic aspirations of Enlightenment modernism."
  23. Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds (2016), "Postmodernism", Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1 ed.), London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-n044-1, ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6, retrieved 7 October 2024, Although diverse and eclectic, postmodernism can be recognized by two key assumptions: first, the assumption that there is no common denominator – in 'nature' or 'truth' or 'God' or 'time' – that guarantees either the One-ness of the world or the possibility of neutral, objective thought; second, the assumption that all human systems operate like language as self-reflexive rather than referential systems, in other words systems of differential function that are powerful but finite, and that construct and maintain meaning and value.
  24. Klages, Mary (6 December 2001). "Postmodernism". University of Idaho. Retrieved 15 October 2024. Postmodernism, like modernism boundaries between high and low forms of art, rejecting rigid genre distinctions, emphasizing pastiche, parody, bricolage, irony, and playfulness. Postmodern art (and thought) favors reflexivity and self-consciousness, fragmentation and discontinuity (especially in narrative structures), ambiguity, simultaneity, and an emphasis on the destructured, decentered, dehumanized subject. But--while postmodernism seems very much like modernism in these ways, it differs from modernism in its attitude toward a lot of these trends. ... Modernism, for example, tends to present a fragmented view of human subjectivity and history ... as something tragic, something to be lamented and mourned as a loss. ... Postmodernism, in contrast, doesn't lament the idea of fragmentation, provisionality, or incoherence, but rather celebrates that. The world is meaningless? Let's not pretend that art can make meaning then, let's just play with nonsense.
  25. McGrath, Alister E. (1996). A passion for truth: the intellectual coherence of evangelicalism (1. publ ed.). Leicester: Apollos. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-85111-447-7. Postmodernism is generally taken to be something of a cultural sensibility without absolutes, fixed certainties or foundations, which takes delight in pluralism and divergence, and which aims to think through the radical 'situatedness' of all human thought
  26. Best & Kellner 1991: "Aesthetic modernity emerged in the new avant-garde modernist movements and bohemian subcultures, which rebelled against the alienating aspects of industrialization and rationalization, while seeking to transform culture and to find creative self-realization in art. Modernity entered everyday life through the dissemination of modern art, the products of consumer society, new technologies, and new modes of transportation and communication. The dynamics by which modernity produced a new industrial and colonial world can be described as ‘modernization’ - a term denoting those processes of individualization, secularization, industrialization, cultural differentiation, commodification, urbanization, bureaucratization, and rationalization which together have constituted the modern world.", p. 2
  27. Scott, John, ed. (2014). A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford Reference (4. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-968358-1. Postmodernity, in whatever guise it appears, thus implies the disintegration of modernist symbolic orders. It denies the existence of all 'universals', including the philosophy of the transcendental self, on the grounds that the discourse and referential categories of modernity (the subject, community, the state, use-value, social class, and so forth) are no longer appropriate to the description of disorganized capitalism.
  28. Gambino, Megan (22 September 2011). "Ask an Expert: What is the Difference Between Modern and Postmodern Art?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 19 November 2024. "I have heard all kinds of theories," says Ho. "I think the truth is that modernity didn't happen at a particular date. It was this gradual transformation that happened over a couple hundred of years." Of course, the two times that, for practical reasons, dates need to be set are when teaching art history courses and organizing museums. In Ho's experience, modern art typically starts around the 1860s, while the postmodern period takes root at the end of the 1950s.
  29. Herman, David J. (1991). "Modernism versus Postmodernism: Towards an Analytic Distinction". Poetics Today. 12 (1): 55–86. doi:10.2307/1772982. ISSN 0333-5372. JSTOR 1772982. Thus one and the same set of evaluative criteria allows commentators to specify in two contradictory ways the relation that modernism bears to postmodernism. On the basis of these criteria modernism can be seen, under different conditions of observation, either as (1) the genuinely emancipatory cultural movement to which postmodernism is but a parasitical and reactionary successor, or as (2) a germ of liberation whose outworn husk it took the radical energies of postmodernism to strip away at last.
  30. Gaither, Gloria (2006). "John Steinbeck: The Postmodern Mind in the Modern Age". Steinbeck Review. 1 (1): 53–68. doi:10.1353/str.2007.0006. ISSN 1938-6214. In real life experience Modern individualism, autonomy and personal freedom had too often produced isolation, loneliness, estrangement, and the disintegration of community. The science that was to free humanity from vulnerability to nature and solve medical, societal, and governmental problems was beginning to be questioned as a savior, as pollution, toxin-generated illness, and stress-induced diseases began to emerge as threats. At present the disillusionment with the Modern promise has blossomed into a recognizable era with some identifiable (though not easily definable) sensibilities commonly known as postmodern.
  31. ^ Welsch & Sandbothe 1997, p. 76.
  32. Hassan 1987, pp. 12ff.
  33. Brooker 2003, p. 202.
  34. Bertens 1995, p. 4.
  35. Hassan 1987, pp. 12ff..
  36. "postmodern (adjective & noun)". Oxford English Dictionary. 2006. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
  37. Thompson 1914, p. 733.
  38. Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. 2004.
  39. Madsen 1995.
  40. Bell 1926.
  41. Birzer 2015.
  42. Russello 2007.
  43. Toynbee 1961, p. 43.
  44. "postmodernism (n.)". OED. 2006. Retrieved 8 February 2024.
  45. ^ Bertens 1995, p. 19.
  46. ^ Brooker 2003, p. 203.
  47. Bertens 1995, p. 30.
  48. ^ Connor 2004, p. 5.
  49. Bertens 1995, p. 201.
  50. ^ Connor 2004, p. 12.
  51. ^ Aylesworth 2015, Introduction & §2.
  52. Anderson, Perry (1998). The Origins of Postmodernity. Verso. pp. 6–12.
  53. Bertens 1995, p. 21.
  54. Bertens 1995, p. 24.
  55. Best & Kellner 1991, pp. 22–23.
  56. Bertens 1995, p. 55.
  57. Bertens 1995, pp. 59–60.
  58. Best & Kellner 1991, p. 21.
  59. Bertens 1995, p. 70.
  60. Bertens 1995, p. 15.
  61. Poster 1989, p. 6.
  62. Bertens 1995, pp. 7, 79.
  63. Bertens 1995, pp. 8, 70.
  64. Bertens 1995, p. 92.
  65. Bertens 1995, pp. 190–96.
  66. Connor 2004, p. 4.
  67. Jenkins, Sarah (25 January 2015). "Postmodern Art". The Art Story. Retrieved 23 October 2024. The reaction took on multiple artistic forms for the next four decades, including Conceptual art, Minimalism, Video art, Performance art, Institutional Critique, and Identity Art. These movements are diverse and disparate but connected by certain characteristics: ironical and playful treatment of a fragmented subject, the breakdown of high and low culture hierarchies, undermining of concepts of authenticity and originality, and an emphasis on image and spectacle.
  68. "Postmodernism". Tate Museum. Retrieved 23 October 2024. As an art movement postmodernism to some extent defies definition – as there is no one postmodern style or theory on which it is hinged. It embraces many different approaches to art making, and may be said to begin with pop art in the 1960s and to embrace much of what followed including conceptual art, neo-expressionism, feminist art, and the Young British Artists of the 1990s.
  69. "About Contemporary Art". J Paul Getty Museum. Retrieved 23 October 2024. Contemporary artists working within the postmodern movement reject the concept of mainstream art and embrace the notion of "artistic pluralism," the acceptance of a variety of artistic intentions and styles. Whether influenced by or grounded in performance art, pop art, Minimalism, conceptual art, or video, contemporary artists pull from an infinite variety of materials, sources, and styles to create art. For this reason, it is difficult to briefly summarize and accurately reflect the complexity of concepts and materials used by contemporary artists.
  70. Karg, Alexandra (27 August 2024). "What is Postmodern Art? The Genre Defined in 8 Iconic Works". The Collector. Retrieved 23 October 2024. It must be emphasized ... that postmodern art cannot be limited to a single style or theory. Many art forms are considered postmodern art. These include Pop Art, Conceptual Art, Neo-Expressionism, Feminist Art, and the art of the Young British Artists in the 1990s.
  71. Acocella, Joan (1 June 2020). "Untangling Andy Warhol". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Retrieved 1 April 2024. There was no huger reputation than Warhol's in the art of the sixties, and in late-twentieth-century art there was no more important decade than the sixties. Much of the art that has followed, in the United States, is unthinkable without him (...)
  72. Metcalf, Stephen (6 December 2018). "Andy Warhol, Cold and Mute, Is the Perfect Artist for Our Times". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Retrieved 1 April 2024. He's now widely regarded as the most important artist of the second half of the 20th century.
  73. "Andy Warhol". The Art Story. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  74. Miller, Brenna (November 2012). "Andy Warhol's Campbell's Soup Cans, 1962". Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective, Ohio State University. Retrieved 25 October 2024. In the 50 years since they first went on display, Andy Warhol's 32 Campbell's Soup Cans have become a canonical symbol of American Pop Art.
  75. "Art Bollocks". Ipod.org.uk. 5 May 1990. Archived from the original on 31 January 2015.
  76. de Castro, Eliana (12 December 2015). "Camille Paglia: "Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart"". FAUSTO - Filosofia, Cultura e Literatura Clássica. Postmodernism is a plague upon the mind and the heart.
  77. "Portland Building gets a place on national history list". Portland Tribune. 17 November 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2013.
  78. Marcus Fairs (12 March 2015). "Michael Graves dies aged 80". Dezeen. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
  79. Jencks, Charles (1975). "The Rise of Post Modern Architecture". Architectural Association Quarterly. 7 (4): 3–14 – via Google Books.
  80. Jencks, Charles (1977). The language of post-modern architecture. New York: Rizzoli. ISBN 0-8478-0167-5.
  81. Beal, Justin (2022). "What is/was Post-Modern (or Never Take the Marble for Granite)". Jencks Foundation. Retrieved 6 October 2024.
  82. Jencks, Charles (1974). The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
  83. Farrell, Terry (2017). Revisiting Postmodernism. Newcastle upon Tyne: RIBA Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85946-632-2.
  84. Schudel, Matt (28 September 2018). "Remembering Robert Venturi, the US architect who said: 'Less is a bore'". Independent. Archived from the original on 16 October 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  85. ^ Banes 2008.
  86. ^ Guadagnino, Kate (20 March 2019). "The pioneers of postmodern dance, 60 years later". New York Times. Retrieved 19 October 2024.
  87. Custodio, Isabel (24 January 2019). "The Voices of Judson Dance Theater". MoMA Magazine. Retrieved 19 October 2024.
  88. Halprin, Anna; Kaplan, Rachel, eds. (1995). Moving toward life: five decades of transformational dance. Hanover, N.H: Wesleyan University Press. p. 254. ISBN 978-0-8195-6286-9.
  89. Kramer, Michael J. (30 June 2019). "The Mind Is a Muscle: Postmodern Dance and Intellectual History". Society for U.S. Intellectual History. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  90. Banes, Sally (9 November 2009). "Judson Dance Theater". Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.a2083961. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  91. Conyers, Claude (23 February 2011). "Postmodern dance". Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.a2092662. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  92. Banes, Sally (2011). Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Wesleyan University Press. pp. xxiv. ISBN 978-0-8195-6160-2. "... by the end of the 1970s, the clarity and simplicity of analytic postmodern dance had served its purpose and threatened to become an exercise in formalism. Dance had become so shorn of meaning (other than reflexive) that for a younger generation of choreographers and spectators it was beginning to be regarded as almost meaningless. The response was to look for ways to reinstall meaning in dance."
  93. ^ Deihl, Nancy (2 July 2009). "Post-modernism in fashion". Grove Art Online. doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t2082725. ISBN 978-1-884446-05-4. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  94. Deihl, Nancy (2009). "Westwood [née Swire], Vivienne". Grove Art Online. doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t2081175. ISBN 978-1-884446-05-4. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  95. Schillinger, L (2013). Opening up the couturier Cristóbal Balenciaga. Paris: International Herald Tribune.
  96. "El hijo de un pescador que se convirtió en el diseñador español más famoso de la historia". Vanity Fair España (in Spanish). 9 December 2016. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
  97. "1968: The End of True Couture?". Fashion Institute of Technology. 11 April 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
  98. Mower, Sarah (7 July 2021). "Balenciaga". Vogue. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
  99. Seward, Mahoro; Ahmed, Osman (15 July 2022). "In 2022, Haute Couture isn't just surviving — it's thriving". i-D. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
  100. Hopkins, Susan (Spring 1995). "Generation Pulp". Youth Studies Australia. 14 (3): 14–19.
  101. ^ Kretzschmar, Laurent (July 2002). "Is Cinema Renewing Itself?". Film-Philosophy. 6 (15). doi:10.3366/film.2002.0015.
  102. ^ Hutcheon, Linda (19 January 1998). "Irony, Nostalgia, and the Postmodern". University of Toronto English Library.
  103. "Representing Postmodern Marginality in Three Documentary Films. - Free Online Library". www.thefreelibrary.com.
  104. ^ Woods, Tim (1999). Beginning postmodernism (1st ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 214–218. ISBN 978-0-7190-5211-8.
  105. Betz, Mark (23 March 2009). "Beyond the subtitle : remapping European art cinema". Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press – via Internet Archive.
  106. Alemany-Galway, Mary (2002). A Postmodern Cinema. Kent, England: Scarecrow Press.
  107. Sherlock, Ben (21 February 2021). "One Movie Both Invented and Perfected the Tech Noir". Game Rant.
  108. Begley, Varun (2004). ""Blade Runner" and the Postmodern: A Reconsideration". Literature/Film Quarterly. 32 (3): 186–192. ISSN 0090-4260. JSTOR 43797175. Roughly speaking, critical responses to Blade Runner fall on either side of a modern/postmodern line. Postmodernist accounts diametrically oppose reading strategies dependent on conventional aesthetic notions (narrative, character, structure, reference, metaphor, symbol, etc.) that collectively we might term modernist. These two approaches entail radically different positions on the nature and function of interpretation.
  109. Poynor 2003, p. 18.
  110. Moszkowicz, J. (1 November 2013). "Re-Learning Postmodernism in the History of Graphic Design: A (Con)Textual Analysis of Design Journal in the Late 1960s". Journal of Design History. 26 (4): 381–400. doi:10.1093/jdh/ept003. ISSN 0952-4649.
  111. ^ Lupton, Ellen; McCoy, Katherine (Spring 1991). "The academy of deconstructed design". Eye. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
  112. Woodham, Jonathan M. (2004). "Cranbrook Academy of Art". A dictionary of modern design. Oxford: New York : Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280097-8.
  113. Poynor 2003, p. 10.
  114. Drucker, Johanna; McVarish, Emily (2008). Graphic Design History. Pearson. pp. 305–306. ISBN 978-0-13-241075-5.
  115. Herwitz 2008, History of Postmodernism.
  116. McHale, B. (2003). Postmodernist Fiction. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. ISBN 1134949162 – via Google Books.
  117. McHale, Brian (20 December 2007). "What Was Postmodernism?". Electronic Book Review. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
  118. Linda Schermer Raphael. Narrative Skepticism: Moral Agency and Representations of Consciousness in Fiction. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 7.
  119. ^ Pasler, Jann (20 January 2001). "Postmodernism". Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.40721. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  120. ^ Alper, Garth (December 2000). "Making sense out of postmodern music?". Popular Music and Society. 24 (4): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03007760008591782. ISSN 0300-7766.
  121. Kramer, Jonathan (2016). Postmodern music, postmodern listening. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 45. ISBN 978-1-5013-0602-0.
  122. Williams, Alastair (2002). "Cage and postmodernism". In Nicholls, David (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to John Cage. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 231–232. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521783484. ISBN 978-0-521-78968-4. What distinguishes Cage's aesthetics from high modernist aesthetics in general is its acceptance of the contingency of structure ... aesthetic meanings are negotiable and far from immutable ... we do not need to look for art, for it is all around us: we only need to throw off a (European) aesthetic mantle, open our ears, and we will hear music.
  123. Cush, Andy (21 September 2023). "Talking Heads' Original Lineup on Stop Making Sense, Their Early Days, and the Future". Pitchfork. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  124. Mitchell, Tony (October 1989). "Performance and the Postmodern in Pop Music". Theatre Journal. 41 (3): 284. doi:10.2307/3208181. JSTOR 3208181.
  125. Jensen, Emily (27 July 2022). "How Virgil Abloh Defined Postmodern Fashion". Jing Daily. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  126. ^ Brown, Stephen (2003). "On Madonna'S Brand Ambition: Presentation Transcript". Association For Consumer Research. pp. 119–201. Archived from the original on 19 April 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
  127. McClary, Susan (26 November 2013). "Madonna". Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.46456. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  128. McGregor, Jock (2008). "Madonna: Icon of Postmodernity" (PDF). L'Abri. pp. 1–8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 December 2010. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  129. de Graaf, Eline (January 2017). "How the silver trowel became blue". Kröller-Müller Museum. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
  130. Jones, Caroline A. (2003). "Post-modernism". Grove Art Online. doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t069002. ISBN 978-1-884446-05-4. Retrieved 15 October 2024.
  131. "Giant Three-Way Plug (Cube Tap)". Philadelphia Museum of Art. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  132. Anapur, Eli (3 October 2023). "Revisiting Claes Oldenburg's The Store - The Slippery Line Between Art and Commodity". Widewalls. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  133. Best & Kellner 1991, p. 22.
  134. Bernstein 1992, p. 11.
  135. Best & Kellner 1991, p. 31.
  136. Best & Kellner 1991, p. 18.
  137. Brooker 2003, p. 205.
  138. ^ Best & Kellner 1991, p. 20.
  139. Poster 1989, p. 4.
  140. Best & Kellner 1991, p. 17.
  141. Reynolds, 6=§2. Deconstructive Strategy.
  142. Brooker 2003, p. 66.
  143. Reynolds, 6=§2.a Metaphysics of Presence/Logocentrism.
  144. ^ Kelly, lead section.
  145. Aylesworth 2015, §4. Productive Difference.
  146. ^ Aylesworth 2015, §6. Hyperreality.
  147. Connor 2004, pp. 568–69.
  148. Constable 2004, pp. 43–47.
  149. Bertens 1995, p. 109.
  150. Kellner 2020, §6. Concluding Assessment.
  151. Constable 2004, p. 47.
  152. Poster 1989, pp. 12–16.
  153. Lyotard 1984, p. xxiv.
  154. Herwitz 2008, Theories of the Postmodern.
  155. Gratton 2018, §1.
  156. Aylesworth 2015, §2 The Postmodern Condition.
  157. Bertens 1995, p. 111.
  158. Lyotard 1984, pp. 65–66.
  159. Bertens 1995, pp. 119–21.
  160. Lyotard 1984, pp. xxiii–xxv.
  161. Gratton 2018, §§3.2–3.4.
  162. Habermas 1990, p. xix.
  163. ^ Aylesworth 2015, §9.
  164. Bertens 1995, p. 108.
  165. Connor 2004, p. 3.
  166. Connor 2004, pp. 3–4.
  167. Roberts 2000, p. 120.
  168. Roberts 2000, p. 121.
  169. Roberts 2000, p. 124.
  170. Roberts 2000, p. 126.
  171. Roberts 2000, p. 128.
  172. Roberts 2000, p. 133.
  173. ^ Grippe, lead section.
  174. Linn 1996, p. xiv.
  175. Barnard, Alan (2021). "Postmodernism and Its Aftermath". History and Theory in Anthropology (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 174–189. doi:10.1017/9781108936620. ISBN 978-1-108-83795-8.
  176. ^ Barrett, S. (1996). Anthropology: a Students Guide to Theory and Method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (pp. 150-163)
  177. Katy Garder and David Lewis (1996). Anthropology, Development and the Post-Modernist Challenge. London, UK: Pluto Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 0745307469.
  178. Spiro, Melford E. (October 1996). "Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Science: A Modernist Critique" (PDF). Comparative Studies in Society and History. 38 (4): 759–780. doi:10.1017/s0010417500020521. S2CID 18702184. Retrieved 29 March 2013.
  179. Hegelund, Allan (May 2005). "Objectivity and Subjectivity in the Ethnographic Method". Qualitative Health Research. 15 (5): 647–668. doi:10.1177/1049732304273933. ISSN 1049-7323. PMID 15802541. Today, we acknowledge that objectivity is relative to a given perspective or preunderstanding, but the applied perspective must compete with other perspectives or paradigms in its effectiveness in our understanding and managing of a lived reality. ... Historically, the notions of objectivity and subjectivity have played a central role in the sciences. Today, their conventional meaning and dichotomy are under attack by the postmodern ways of thinking. During the past few decades, any mention of words and expressions such as truth, knowledge, value free, objectivity, bias, fact, reality, and correspondence between word and world has come to be regarded with increasing suspicion, up to the point where many scientists seem unwilling to run the risk of using them at all. This trend ... seems to be much more pronounced in the humanities than in the natural sciences.
  180. Erickson, P. (2017). A History of Anthropological Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (pp.130)
  181. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretations of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, Inc. (pp.15)
  182. Johnson 2010, p. 105.
  183. Preucel 2018, p. 12.
  184. Trigger 2007.
  185. Trigger 2007, p. 44–50.
  186. Johnson 2010, p. 101.
  187. Hodder 2018.
  188. Preucel 2018.
  189. Hodder 2018, p. 8.
  190. ^ Sands, Roberta; Nuccio, Kathleen (November 1992). "Postmodern Feminist Theory and Social Work: A Deconstruction". Social Work. 37: 489. doi:10.1093/sw/40.6.831. ISSN 1545-6846.
  191. ^ Ebert, Teresa L. (December 1991). "The "Difference" of Postmodern Feminism". College English. 53 (8): 886–904. doi:10.2307/377692. ISSN 0010-0994. JSTOR 377692.
  192. ^ Tong, Rosemarie (1989). Feminist thought : a comprehensive introduction. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 217–224. ISBN 9780429493836. OCLC 1041706991.
  193. Wallin, Dawn C (2001). Postmodern Feminism and Educational Policy Development. McGill Journal of Education. pp. 27–43. OCLC 967130390.
  194. Douzinas 2004, p. 197.
  195. ^ Brown, Steven (1993). "Postmodern Marketing?". European Journal of Marketing. 27 (4). European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27 Iss: 4: 19–34. doi:10.1108/03090569310038094. ISSN 0309-0566.
  196. Canavan, Brendan; McCamley, Claire (1 February 2020). "The passing of the postmodern in pop? Epochal consumption and marketing from Madonna, through Gaga, to Taylor". Journal of Business Research. 107: 222–230. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.005. ISSN 0148-2963.
  197. Stephens, Mitchell (23 August 1992). "A New Breed of Psychologists Says There's No One Answer to the Question 'Who Am I?'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
  198. S. Kvale ed., Psychology and Postmodernism (1992) p. 40
  199. L. Holtzman/J. R. Moss eds., Postmodern Psychologies, Societal Practice and Political Life (2000) p. 179
  200. Gergen, Kenneth J. (2001). "Psychological science in a postmodern context". American Psychologist. 56 (10): 803–813. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.803. ISSN 0003-066X.
  201. Smedslund, Jan (1 April 2021). "From statistics to trust: Psychology in transition". New Ideas in Psychology. 61: 100848. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100848. ISSN 0732-118X.
  202. Gantt 2024.
  203. Goodchild 1990, pp. 119–137.
  204. Simonsen 1990, p. 57.
  205. Jacobs, Jane (1993). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Modern Library. ISBN 0-679-64433-4.
  206. Irving 1993, p. 479.
  207. "The Next American System — The Master Builder (1977)". PBS. 3 February 2010.
  208. Hatuka & d'Hooghe 2007, pp. 20–27.
  209. Irving 1993, p. 460.
  210. Goodchild 1990, pp. 119–137; Hatuka & d'Hooghe 2007, pp. 20–27; Irving 1993, pp. 474–87; Simonsen 1990, pp. 51–62
  211. Soja, Edward W. (14 March 2014). My Los Angeles: From Urban Restructuring to Regional Urbanization. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-95763-3 – via Google Books.
  212. Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the City. Routledge. p. 437. ISBN 9780415252256.
  213. Dear & Flusty 1998, p. 51 "Burgess’s model was a broad generalization, not intended to be taken too literally. He expected, for instance, that his schema would apply only in the absence of complicating factors such as local topography. He also anticipated considerable variation within the different zones."
  214. Dear & Flusty 1998, p. 50.
  215. Garde, Ajay (2018). "Value of Postmodernism for Urban Planning and Design". Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 35 (4): 291–302. ISSN 0738-0895. JSTOR 26893774.
  216. Raschke, Carl (2017). Postmodern Theology: A Biopic.
  217. Vanhoozer 2003, pp. 22–25.
  218. Crockett, Clayton (2011). Radical Political Theology. pp. 163.
  219. Vanhoozer 2003, p. 20.
  220. Potter, Garry; Lopez, Jose, eds. (2001). After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism. London: The Athlone Press. p. 4.
  221. Fjellestad, Danuta; Engberg, Maria (2013). "Toward a Concept of Post-Postmodernism or Lady Gaga's Reconfigurations of Madonna". Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture. 12 (4). Archived from the original on 23 February 2013. DiVA 833886.
  222. Kirby, Alan (2006). "The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond". Philosophy Now. 58: 34–37.
  223. Gibbons, Alison (2017). "Postmodernism is dead. What comes next?". TLS. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
  224. Mann, Steve (2003). "Decon (Decon Squared): Deconstructing Decontamination" (PDF). Leonardo. 36 (4): 285–290. doi:10.1162/002409403322258691. JSTOR 1577323. S2CID 57559253.
  225. Campbell, Heidi A. (2006). "Postcyborg Ethics: A New Way to Speak of Technology". Explorations in Media Ecology. 5 (4): 279–296. doi:10.1386/eme.5.4.279_1.
  226. Mann, Steve; Fung, James; Federman, Mark; Baccanico, Gianluca (2002). "PanopDecon: Deconstructing, decontaminating, and decontextualizing panopticism in the postcyborg era". Surveillance & Society. 1 (3): 375–398. doi:10.24908/ss.v1i3.3346.
  227. McCaffery, Larry (24 May 2004). "White Noise/White Heat, or Why the Postmodern Turn in Rock Music Led to Nothing but Road". Electronic Book Review. Retrieved 26 September 2024.
  228. "Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 - 1990". Victoria and Albert Museum. 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  229. "Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 – 1990" (PDF). Victoria and Albert Museum. 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  230. Atkinson, Paul (2012). ""Postmodernism: Style and Subversion, 1970-1990"". Design Issues. 28 (4): 93–97. doi:10.1162/DESI_r_00179. ISSN 0747-9360. JSTOR 23273855.
  231. Connor, Steven (2022). "What is/was Post-Modern: Irony, Urgency (and So On)". Jencks Foundation. Retrieved 28 December 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Bibliography

External links

Library resources about
Postmodernism
Links to related articles
Aesthetics
Areas
Schools
Philosophers
Concepts
Works
Related
Sub-fields of and approaches to human geography
Sub-fields
Approaches
Categories: