| Revision as of 23:32, 30 December 2006 editSteel (talk | contribs)20,265 edits →[]: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:56, 23 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,971 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Steel/Archive 16) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=2 July 2021}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{User:Steel359/Talkheader}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 75K | |||
| |counter = 16 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 3 | |||
| |algo = old(365d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Steel/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| ⚫ | {{User:Steel359/Talkheader}} __TOC__ | ||
| <!-- | <!-- | ||
| ⚫ | |
||
| ⚫ | LEAVE NEW MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE | ||
| ⚫ | --> | ||
| == User Talk Archive 4 == | |||
| May I ask you to remove the <nowiki>]</nowiki>-tag out of your user talk archive 4? Thanks in advance. ] 18:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Done. -- ] 23:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | --> | ||
| ==N-Ball...Deleted== | |||
| Would you please explain why you deleted the page for ]. I asked for a little bit of time to improve the site and you deleted it right away. I don't mean to get angry, but I'm very offended that you deleted this page that i was really trying to make good before I even had a chance to do so. | |||
| --] 06:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Has N-Ball been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works? -- ] 12:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I just don't get it though. It's not like I'm advertising or anything. Sure, i may have put the cost of it, but i see that kind of stuff all the time. And as far as non-trivial, half the articles on wikipedia aren't trivial. Also, every other game has an article here, so why shouldn't this one. Because it's not that popular, or just because it's not your favorite. Don't you think that's a little biased. What can i do to make it an acceptable article, or are you just going to sit there vasting in the glory of the little power you have? | |||
| --] 17:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Note that "but that game has an article so this one should to" is not a valid reason to include this one. I repeat my original question: has N-Ball been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works? I.e. has anyone other than the creators ever written anything about this game? -- ] 22:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| yes, they have, i just haven't had time to include them yet. hense me asking for more time. i have several reviews i can put in, and i'm not a creator of the game, i just thought it should have an article. if you had actually given me some time, you would have seen reviews and a source list | |||
| --] 02:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| hello? can you respond...i would really appreciate if you would at least explain in detail why you deleted the n-ball page, so i can explain in turn my rebuttles of the issue--] 03:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm waiting for these sources. -- ] 16:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry == | |||
| Sorry about . I've not participated in an ArbCom before. - (]) (]) (]) 23:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Neither have I, really. Don't worry about it though. -- ] 23:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Template:Infobox_Philippine_High_School on deletion review== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ] 02:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am at my wits ends with this user, who as you know has been heavily engaged in editing ]. If you look at the edit history of the article, he has made literally hundreds of edits. His style seems to be to make lots of small edits which together add bias to the article, flame anyone who resists him, and never let up. When he is blocked, he returns as soon as the block is over and more or less reverts to "his" last preferred version. | |||
| I would respectfully say that in my opinion, bans on the user himself aren't going to work - he needs to be banned from editing ''this article'' otherwise he will gradually, over the course of time, turn it into propaganda for his personal beliefs. Perhaps if banned from editing this article, he would move on to edit something else on Misplaced Pages productively? | |||
| It goes without saying, I hope, that if he was to be prevented from editing this article, I personally would be more than happy to step away from it. --] 13:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Go to ], explain the situation to there and propose an article ban. Make sure to bring people's attention to Mitsos's block log, and that RfC from a few weeks ago. Try to use lots of diffs. -- ] 18:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. Will give the whole thing one more chance before doing so. Another user got involved and that has saved me pulling my hair out. --] 18:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Mitsos has been edit warring again and has shown total disregard for ]. Relevant diffs: | |||
| #Mitsos deletes any reference to a victim of assassination (Mallios) being a former torturer for a previous regime - . | |||
| #SandyDancer finds reliable source (BBC News Online), and restores references to Mallios being a torturer - . | |||
| #Mitsos reverts this to "accused of" wording - - first revert. | |||
| #Michaelis Famelis restores - . | |||
| #Mitsos reverts again to "accused of" wording - . | |||
| #SandyDancer adds official source (Greek Embassy, LA Consulate website) and restores original wording with amends to reflect new, additional source - . | |||
| #Mitsos reverts again - . | |||
| #SandyDancer restores again - . | |||
| #Mitsos reverts to essentially the same version a fourth time - . | |||
| I accept there may be a debate to be had on the talk page about sources - but Mitsos' starting position here was that he wanted factual information removed from the article - and when sources were presented, he adopted a new entrenched position in line with the Greek nationalist / neo-nazi agenda pushes constantly on Misplaced Pages. I accept you may not want to be involved in this - but without an admin watching this, all articles Mitsos edits will constantly be subject to a barrage of edits by him seeking to push his POV. --] 23:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I've sent this to ] (See ), just so I can't be accused of unfairly picking on Mitsos. I'm hope you have no objections. -- ] 23:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == Speedy deletion of ]. == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| A few days ago you deleted an abuse report that ended up it with the wrong filepath. Since then, the actual report in the ] has been deleted. The reason given is that this page was created by a banned user. Several of us have worked on the page. I don't know if it was created by a banned user, but my account ] has been blocked and the page has been deleted. The page is meant to fix the problem that there are many editors who edit from this IP and that they shouldn't all be confused with a banned user who also edits from this IP address. If you could undelete that page I would greatly appreciate it. I've long edited under this IP and its only in the last few months that problems have arisen. I created an account with the hopes that this would get me past those problems, but that's now been blocked. My hope is that we will get Admins to understand the significance of this IP address. Thanks in advance for your help. --] 20:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Talk to ], or something. -- ] 20:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 03:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Brothers Past on deletion review== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ] 22:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == seth and willie fred == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| Why was the Seth and Willie Fred page deleted? It is a real band and their page was deleted after I uploaded it. {{Unsigned|Lightning7smith}} | |||
| :There was no indication that this band is notable enough for inclusion within an encyclopedia. -- ] 22:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 03:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Time to unprotect ]? == | |||
| == Page for Mark Nesbitt == | |||
| I think it's time to unprotect this article. Enough time has gone by and the vandals are gone. ] 18:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like it's already been done. -- ] 22:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I notice that you previously created a page that was deleted. I am interested in recreating this page. Thanks ] (]) 15:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for the protection Tag on the above. | |||
| :Your intervention is much appreciated. | |||
| :]--] 22:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:56, 23 November 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Steel has not edited Misplaced Pages since 2 July 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Click here to leave a new message
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
- Refining the administrator elections process
- AI-generated images depicting living people
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Proposed rewrite of WP:BITE
- LLM/chatbot comments in discussions
 Archives |
|---|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 03:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 03:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Page for Mark Nesbitt
Hi, I notice that you previously created a page that was deleted. I am interested in recreating this page. Thanks Kimpsky (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories: