Misplaced Pages

Talk:Axis powers: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:40, 19 September 2020 editOyMosby (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,891 edits RfC on infobox: reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:36, 20 December 2024 edit undoHMSLavender (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers61,576 editsm Reverted edits by 2403:4800:9462:4101:E2CE:4952:F43D:4336 (talk) (AV)Tags: AntiVandal Rollback 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Hatnote|'''Misplaced Pages requires that ], for this reason no country will be listed in the infobox as an Axis power unless ] on the topic of WW2 can be presented explicitly describing them <u>as an Axis power</u>. If you want a country to be included in the infobox, please find sources to support this before opening a discussion.'''}}
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Vital article|class=C|topic=History|level=5}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=b}}
{{WikiProject Germany|class=C|importance=high|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y}}
{{WikiProject International relations|class=C|importance=High}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=high}}
{{WPMILHIST
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=High}}
|class=C
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
|B-Class-1=no |B-Class-1=no
Line 20: Line 21:
|Italian-task-force=yes |Italian-task-force=yes
|WWII-task-force=yes}} |WWII-task-force=yes}}
{{WikiProject Japan|class=C|importance=high|milhist=yes|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes}} {{WikiProject Japan|importance=high|milhist=yes}}
{{WikiProject Italy|class=C|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Italy|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Hungary|class=C|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Hungary|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Romania|class=C|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Austria|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Bulgaria|class=C|importance=Mid|no-todolist=yes}} {{WikiProject Slovakia|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|class=C|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Croatia|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Thailand|class=C|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Albania|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Former countries|class=c}} {{WikiProject Romania|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Jewish history}} {{WikiProject Bulgaria|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Judaism}} {{WikiProject Finland|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Thailand|importance=Low}}
}}
{{WikiProject Former countries}}
{{archive box|
{{WikiProject Jewish history|importance=high}}
*]
{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=high}}
*]
*]
*]
*]
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 7 |counter = 13
|minthreadsleft = 5 |minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(90d) |algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Axis powers/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:Axis powers/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Global map requested}}
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=90 |small=yes |dounreplied=yes}}

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 March 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Axis powers|answered=yes}}
Why is Iraq not listed in the infobox? They were a full-fledged member of the Axis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/Anglo-Iraqi_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/1941_Iraqi_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat ] (]) 00:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> The FAQ at the top says {{tq|"Only the countries for which reliable sources have been found, describing the country unambiguously as a member of the Axis, should be included."}} As discussed previously, co-belligerents of the Axis are not considered members of the Axis and hence do not go in the infobox. The question of including Iraq in the infobox has also been discussed multiple times (see the archives), and consensus has also been against inclusion. ] (]) 23:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
::so we add Finland and croatia but not iraq?
::I don't get your logic here ] (]) 03:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
:::iraq is literally blue on the map on the allies article ] (]) 01:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
::::Hi @]. On Misplaced Pages, facts that can be challenged (which definitely includes which states were Axis powers) need to be clearly supported by ]. Misplaced Pages, including the map on the page about the Allies, is not a reliable source.
::::For Iraq, there is no source saying it was ever a member of the Axis powers. If we look at what the sources say, we can see that it is not clearly considered to have been an Axis power during the few months that Rashid Ali was in power. For example, points out that Germany and Italy had no desire to make deals with Arab states since Italy wanted the Middle East as part of its empire and Germany saw the Arab states as a distration from its upcoming invasion of the USSR. The source also states that no formal alliance was ever concluded.
::::For Finland and Croatia, there are ample sources stating that they were members of the Axis powers which you can find in the article. For Iraq those sources don't appear to exist. If you are aware of a reliable source that clearly and unambiguously describes Iraq as a member of the Axis powers, please let us know. ] (]) 07:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

== Issues with the map of participants in the info-box ==

Regarding the map of participants in the info-box, it contains inaccuracies:

* The USSR is listed as having switched sides from the Axis to the Allies, which is in between complete falsehood and utter lunacy. Neither the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact nor the joint-but-time-offset German-Soviet invasion of Poland ever made the USSR a member of the Axis, especially not de jure.

* Ethiopia is listed as having switched sides, but how can a colonial government (Italian East Africa) "switch sides" when it was disbanded altogether and replaced with a British military administration?

* If Ethiopia is listed as having switches sides, then Italy should have certainty been included in the list as well, but it was not. The situation with the Italian Social Republic complicates the matter, but since France is already dealt with separately (on the map) in terms of Vichy France and German-occupied France, the same could be done with Italy (showing the Italian Social Republic borders at establishment in blue, and the rest of Italy in blue but with a "switched sides from the Axis to the Allies" marker).
] (]) 12:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
*:Ethiopia went from being an Italian colony to one that had been liberated and Ethiopia's full sovereignty was restored with the signing of the Anglo-Ethiopian Agreement in December 1944 (duing Ww2). ] (]) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
*:We do not list the USSR as a member of the Axis. ] (]) 13:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
*::The map is garbage. It might well be better not to have it. ] (]) 10:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
*:::This is not the first time problems with the map have been raised. Other discussions where problems with the map have been raised include:
*:::*]
*:::*]
*:::*]
*:::*]
*:::*]
*:::*]<br/>
*:::For this reason I am removing the map as a ] move simply because it is not a good illustration for this article. ] (]) 13:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
*::::Don't care about the map, but this article cannot have the same lead image as ]. It will only further conflation. ] (]) 03:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
*:::::I'm fine with this change. If there were a colour poster or similar then that would be even better but I'm not aware of one. PS - , but we'd need a hi-res copy, and to be sure that it's free-to-use (it ''probably'' is, but that's not good enough). ] (]) 10:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 10:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)


== Only Axis powers should be listed in the infobox in an article about the Axis powers ==
== Iran ==


There was an extensive discussion about why the infobox only included actual members of the Axis. It's now been changed back to its previous format without any discussion as far as I can see. This is not a Paradox game or online games forum like NationStates, we need <u>'''''sources'''''</u> to describe a country positively as having been <u>'''''one of the Axis powers'''''</u>, not whatever idea someone has just come up with on their own about what the Axis was.<br/>
Iran was invaded by Britain and the USSR in August 1941. The invasion was related to WWII and the Allied war effort (''see ]''). Should Iran be added to the 'Controversial cases' or 'Co-belligerent state combatants' section?--] (]) 09:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
:Yes, Iran was overwhelmingly pro-Axis, like Egypt and Iraq. (] (]) 17:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC))


The second world war is almost certainly the most written-about subject in world history. If you cannot find a source explicitly stating that a country was one of the Axis powers (or similar language) then please consider that it may not have been an Axis power, and that your idea of what the Axis powers were does not match what reliable sources say about it. It is, in fact, not easy to find reliable sources that list the members of the Axis beyond Germany, Japan, and Italy, and NONE of the sources we've reviewed so far that do try to provide exhaustive lists of Axis members include the countries that people typically want to add to the infobox - they don't include Vichy France, they don't include the USSR, they don't include Iraq, they don't include Iran, they don't include Manchuria. However, they DO typically include Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, and Romania, and (less often) Croatia, Slovakia Thailand. You can review the sources that list Axis powers in the article, but the convenience of anyone reading this page, here's the main ones:
== Rmoving Mengjiang (Inner Mongolia) ==


:* - This lists Albania, Bulgaria, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, and Thailand. It discusses Croatia as well but is a bit ambiguous about whether it was an Axis member. It mentions Iraq but does not define it as having been a member of the Axis, but instead as a "puppet state" of the Allies. It explicitly describes Spain as having been neutral. There is no mention at all of Vichy France here.
I am proposing to remove Mengjiang from the list of nominally independent Japanese puppet states. The reason is:
:* - this defines the Axis as including Germany, Italy, Japan, Croatia, Finland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia. Notably it does not mention Thailand. It also does not mention Iraq, Vichy France etc. as Axis countries.
a. The article is about those states, authentically or nominally independent, fighting against the Allies in WW2.
:* - this book does contain a list as such, and primarily focuses on Europe, but the following countries are explicitly described as Axis powers throughout the book: Germany, Italy, Japan, Finland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria. It is more equivocal about Slovakia and Croatia, describing them as puppet countries - this does not mean they were not Axis powers in the view of the author, but neither confirms that they were. There is no mention of Iraq, Vichy France, and the usual suspects, in the context of describing who was part of the Axis.<br/>
b. Mengjiang was a nominally "independent" puppet state only until 1940, afterwards it nominally became an "autonomous" part of the Wang Jing Wei regime.
I could understand someone, based on the Bowman reference, wanting to add Albania, but since this does not match what other sources say about Albania in WW2 I'm inclined not to. Similarly I could understand someone wanting to remove Thailand since only Bowman includes in their list, though other sources appear to support this (see the sources in the section about Thailand, including the Thai historical dictionary). I can even understand just limiting the Axis to Germany, Italy, and Japan since many books/articles do only talk about those countries as "the Axis". What I can't understand is constantly trying to add Iraq/Vichy/USSR/whatever without any sources at all. ] (]) 09:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
c. Neither Japan nor any of its puppets was formally engaged in WW2 until Pearl Harbor in 1941, by which time Mengjiang had lost its nominal "independence".
] (]) 01:00, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:Ad b: Yes, it was a puppet state of Japan until 1940. In that year is was taken over by ], another puppet state of Japan.
:And according to some scholars, the ] was part/a prelude to the Second World War. So no, removing it seems a bad idea. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 01:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:: I believe most scholars consider the ] to be NOT a part of WW2 until Pearl Harbor, as the generally accepted WW2 start time is Sept.1939, not 1937 when China and Japan went to war.
:: Furthermore, if Mengjiang is to be included, so should be the ] and ], which like Mengjiang were nominally "independent" puppet states which existed until 1940 when they, again like Mengjiang, were absorbed into the Wang Jing Wei regime.
] (]) 02:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:::If there's no further discussion, I will proceed with edit tomorrow, thanks. ] (]) 09:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
::::That is not how it works here. Give it time for discussion. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 10:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::I have no objection to including the Chinese puppet regimes or to removing Mengjiang. The concept of the "Axis powers" is somewhat fuzzy when you move beyond the Tripartite Pact powers and in this article we can cover these puppet states in their own sections or as part of the Japanese war effort. ] (]) 22:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::: Thank you for your input of opinion, Srnec.] (]) 23:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::: To "The Banner", you are surely welcome to give any further reason for your objection, though I belive the one you gave yesterday has been properly addressed and no longer an issue. ] (]) 23:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::::Sad for you, it are your arguments that are rebuffed.
:::::::But {{ping|Srnec}} has a point that the Japanese client-states/puppet-states make the article somewhat fuzzy. With the fact that the present article is already quite long, a reorganisation/rewrite looks sensible. In this case by shortening the separate entries of the Japanese client-states/puppet-states (just a list) and move the background to ]. The rather random removal of just one puppet-state is not correct. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 10:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
::::::::Please stop making offensive comments, "The Banner". I have responded to your opinion with explanation, you responded to this with nothing but saying I am sad. Ironically, it was also you who said "That is not how it works here". This time, no, that is NOT how it works here. ] (]) 23:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::::: Your description of the proposed removal of Mengjiang as "random" is not precise too. I have clearly explained why Mengjiang is not compatible with the current list, while all other Japanese puppet states are -- they fought against Allies in WW2 as nominally "independent" entities. ] (]) 23:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::::::And why are the others suitable? And do you have any opinion about my proposal? <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 01:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::::::: To "The Banner", I have addressed the difference between Mengjiang and the others, but in case you still find my point ambiguous, then I'll say it again: the other puppets fought in WW2 as nominally "independent" states, but Mengjiang fought in WW2 nominally as a part of the Wang Jing Wei regime.
:::::::::: Furthermore, I previously thought your proposal of shortening was addressed to Srnec. As for me, my concern is about removing Mengjiang because it doesn't fit into this list. You're surely welcome to shorten the article in your proposed way, at least I wouldn't disagree with it. ] (]) 04:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
::::::::::: To "The Banner", while I remain convinced Mengjiang doesn't belong to the list, if you disagree with its removal, then I will not proceed with the edit, since a consensus can't be reached and I won't force it upon you. Happy new year to all. ] (]) 10:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)


Albania was invaded and occupied, Thailand was not. ] (]) 11:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==
::Generally agree Steve, but more to the point: no other source I've seen says Albania was a member of the Axis so Bowman seems an outlier here. ] (]) 10:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-01-09T01:22:20.690173 | Andrzeja Olejko Słowackie epizody z polskiego Podkarpacia Sanok 39.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 01:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 August 2024 ==
== Status of Japan ==


{{Edit extended-protected|Axis powers|answered=yes}}
Was Japan actually part of the Axis? I'm pretty sure they had their own alliance going, the ]. Japan just signed the Tripartite Pact. ] (]) 11:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Please read the lead, it is generally treated and considered like that.(] (]) 04:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)) ] (]) 22:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)


Hello, I noticed that they removed kingdom of iraq from the axis states meanwhile after the success of the iraqi coup detat in 1941 Iraq joined the axis states, Someone who deleted the article of the kingdom of iraq in this page, So I hope you guys fix it and thank you for your service
== Norway and Finland ==
Here the article for making it easy to copy and paste
*{{flag|Kingdom of Iraq}}{{Efn|Co-belligerent of the Axis led by the ] which declared a ] against British rule. Backed by other Axis states in the region during what became the ].}}
:Do you have evidence that they joined the Axis? <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 23:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 23:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 August 2024 ==
Norway and Finland were both allies of Germany from 1940 to 1945. (] (]) 17:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC))
:Norway doesn't count because it was under military occupation, had a puppet government led by a party that never got relevant amounts of votes, and had a governor or "reichskommissar" appointed by Hitler himself. Norway was not even nominally independent, but was rather a reichskommissariat! ] (]) 18:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
::Norway and Finland both took part in the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. (] (]) 18:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC))


{{edit extended-protected|Axis powers|answered=yes}}
== RfC on infobox ==
Add Oxford commas. ] (]) 15:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{notdone}} Not clear what the request is. Please mention the specific changes in a ]. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)


== Maps ==
{{rfc|hist|rfcid=416BDDB}}
Should the infobox be slimmed down, as ? ] (]) 23:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


See ]. -- ] (]) 07:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
*The rule for inclusion that I applied was "Did they sign a peace treaty with the Allies?" This excludes co-belligerents like the Soviet Union, Iraq and Danzig as well as puppet states like Slovakia and Croatia. There is no need to separate the belligerents based on when or whether they signed the Tripartite Pact, which is ''not'' the defining feature of the Axis. As the first sentence indicates, the only thing they had in common was that they "fought in World War II against the Allies". Signing a peace treaty with the Allies is proof that a state was Axis. <small>Note that while this proposal would "remove" the Croatia issue, that is not the only reason to prefer it. I wrote that "I'd prefer a plain list of 'Axis' powers" back in ] when discussing the USSR.</small> ] (]) 23:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
*{{sbb}} '''Seems a little excessive, but I would support an intermediate edit.''' Personally, I think the distinction of when and by which instrument parties joined as axis powers/co-belligerents is content that is useful to the reader (especially those with limited knowledge of WWII) at a glance. Thus I can't see how stripping that summarized context out of the infobox is a step in the right direction. I also find the argument that "signing a peace treaty with the Allies is proof that a state was Axis" has more than a little bit of an ] streak to it, and is not consistent with the ] of historical research to the extent I am familiar with it as regards what defined an Axis power as opposed to a state that was aligned with one in some capacity at some stage in the war. So I'd just as soon those list remain more extensive and delineated. All of that said, I think the footnotes are excessive: infoboxes are meant to summarize the broadest details of the content of the article in a fashion that is as brief as it can be while remaining salient; a more nuanced discussion of the particular can and should be reserved for the main body of the prose, and needn't be repeated in the infobox to break down the particulars of the box's own content. There are additionally ] issues with all of this small print. So, in short '''keep the more fullsome and subcategorized list of belligerents, but remove the subnotes'''. ''] ]'' 02:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Mostly oppose''' I would axe the "Co-belligerent states" section. Most sources on the Axis powers do not define the co-belligerent states as being Axis powers (for instance, I am not finding sources that say this with regard to Danzig, and with regard to Finland it is a matter of some controversy<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Miloiu |first1=Silviu-Marian |title=Mobilizing the European idea at Europe’s eastern frontier. The war propaganda of Romania and Finland as recorded in their bilateral relationship |journal=Valahian Journal of Historical Studies |date=2005 |issue=3-4 |pages=67–75 |url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=210080 |language=English |issn=1584-2525}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Holmila |first1=Antero |last2=Silvennoinen |first2=Oula |title=The Holocaust Historiography in Finland |journal=Scandinavian Journal of History |date=2011 |volume=36 |issue=5 |pages=605–619 |doi=10.1080/03468755.2011.627500}}</ref>), so this part of the infobox has the potential to confuse or mislead readers. However, per Snow's comment I do not think that most reliable sources define Axis powers based on peace treaties. Therefore, I support continuing to organize the template based on the Tripartiate pact signatories. I do not have an opinion on the subnotes. Slovakia should certainly stay in the template because (until 1944) it was not a puppet state and joined Hitler's war more or less voluntarily. Reliable sources state that it was one of the Axis powers.<ref>"In November 1940, the Slovak Republic joined the Axis powers (Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and imperial Japan), which led to the declaration of war on the Soviet Union in June 1941, and on Great Britain and the USA in December 1941." '']'', p. 181</ref> (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 10:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''No''', more details the best.(] (]) 21:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC))
*'''Possibly but prefer 2017 version </nowiki>]...''' It gives more detail and better information for the reader. It was a long standing version changed without an RfC I believe. How about this. I agree with KIENGIR that more details is best. Surpising as I had the impression before they were for short hand “simplified” names instead of the actual full names of the entities. As for going by signers of the tripartite agreement this is also kind of an ]. Also it misleads the readers as Slovakia and The Independent State of Croatia were Axis puppets installed by German or for NDH German and Italy. The current infobox implies equal weight to the puppet and their masters as well as other states such as other existing states like Romania and Bulgaria that aligned themselves with the Axis Powers, they weren’t invaded and puppet regimes put in place. The reader should know the difference. Of course a puppet state will be aligned with the master state that installed it. And they answer to that master that here bing the axis powers. Slovakia and NDH were aligned and fought for the Axis side but were not “powers”. NDH is regarded as “what is no more than a puppet Axis regime” even looking at the History Channel website. So to call it an Axis Power seems quite POV push even if inadvertently. (Even though the NDH regime was eager to follow Hitler’s racial persecution laws and then some and had autonomy to an extent.)At least when looking up Axis Powers in Encyclopedic Brittanica and other such resources. I don’t see them regarded as such. Which is pov not neutral. Long story short: '''And so I think the infobox should go back to its previous version listing all collaborating entities. As it was''' </nowiki>] and that the RfC should include this as an option. More details is best KIENGER points out and might agree with this option. And would make sure readers see all associated with the Axis powers. It isn’t long and seems fine on my screen. I don’t understand why it was changed and decided that Tripartite Signers defines Axis Powers. It seems kinda cherry-picking. Again, more details would be better. Else I would support Srnec’s new more simplified version as it address the issue with undue ] equalizing puppet states to their master states as would be the perception of the readers. Either of the two I am fine with. This is why I really dislike infoboxes in general. ] (]) 21:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
::As pointed out in the Tripartite pact talk, establishment history of countries are not relevant or a base of any distinguishment, Slovakia and Croatia are equal partners, etc.(] (]) 23:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC))
:::That is a point of view you hold, yes. But that doesn’t make it a matter of fact. It is a base of distinguishment. It also doesn’t address my other points in my post. But as was pointed out in the Tripartite pact talk, a puppet state is not equal to the master state. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a puppet. A puppet state is not the same is an existing independent state such as Bulgaria, German or Romania. I don’t get how that can possibly be argued. Otherwise NDH would’t be dubbed “axis puppet state” So I don’t understand your view here. Slovakia and NDH were not equal partners to Germany nor functioned freely like Romania. NDH being created from German-Italian occupied land is a differentiator absolutely. A puppet doesn’t make the choice, the master finds whoever will align with them and install them in power such as Hitler did with Ante Pavelic and his Ustashe terrorist organization. From a Croatian Ultranationalist POV NDH would be dubbed a legitimate official Croatia (as apposed to a meere puppet pretending to be it’s own country) as I’ve seen rightwingers try to do, but most RS don’t label it so. Also Federal State of Croatia was not part of the pack along with different borders. So saying Croatia isn’t specific enough, etc. Again all pointed out in the Tripartite pact talk page. It is a base of distinguishment when another country baring a similar name exists later on particularly with different borders. As another editor {{ping|Peacemaker67}} explained as well there. No point re-explaining all this here. It’s all on that talk page. And I do not wish to do reruns of past debates which had no conclusion. The focus is what version info box is best. Ultimately I mentioned that being you agree with more details being better, I see no reason for not reverting to the original infobox </nowiki>]. I also find it amusing that the infobox map doesn’t show NDH as an axis power but as (colonies or co-belligerents) so it seems this was all understood for quite a while. ] (]) 23:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
::::I won't repeat the discussion made already in the Tripartite pact talk (in this we agree, despite you did again go to details), so to your recent argumentation, which I disagree and reject the answer is there.(] (]) 21:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC))
::::: Again I was agreeing with you that more detail is better and that I think the original infobox that I linked was better detailed. You chose to reply about an old discussion to begin with, to be fair. That was not my main point in my vote explanation. I already said we will not see eye to eye on the matter of state naming and who is equal to who. That isn’t the main point in my vote explanation though. I didn’t repeat details in our past conversation. My “recent argumentation” is new not the same as the other talk. Not even 5% of it. So I don’t understand what comes across as a snide remark of “despite you did again go to details”. As I haven’t repeated myself. Most of my reply is about OR, Weight, the original infobox, me agreeing that the more details the better, the other user Peacemaker agreeing on the name, and how Croatian Nationalists like to view NDH as a real country (and some still think it exists). My replies are detailed rather than a short sentence as a reply as you did so others know what my reasoning is. However you replied in a “matter of fact” tone as if that talk page came to the same conclusion as you, when really you simply stated your pov not a definitive fact and I stated my pov on the matter. But rhat doesn’t explain what version of the infobox is to be used which is my main point of debate. My focus is the infobox not the Slovakia NDH naming debate from while back. I brought it up as one of many different points is all for the infobox change. It isn’t the ONLY one. Let’s be civil now, KIENGIR. I meant not to antagonize a rerun of an old discussion. You rejecting my proposal of going back to the old infobox is not answered on the Tripartite Talk page. What do you mean? ] (]) 22:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
::::::I understand and notice everything, even if I am concise, and the repetitive content was much higher in percentage. No civility harmed, again, discussion about this took place in the Tripartite talk, any of my answers are there related in details, I just summarized here my point shortly.(] (]) 04:15, 19 September 2020 (
:::::::Not really that much higher but okay. Now that that’s been established repeatedly. How about your take on the other 95% of my vote comment not related to the Tripartite TalK Page discussion? The Weight, the original infobox, me agreeing that the more details the better, etc, The actual main point of my vote and this RfC? Would the 2017 version be the best settlement? If there are mistake what are they since we both agree having more infomercial is better else why not just list Germany, Japan and Italy if we want to keep refining the list of possible mistakes as Srnec mentioned in their proposed version?] (]) 04:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
UTC))
::::::::I disagree these percentages, as I reflected. The old-detailed infobox, even by correcting errors was rejected to be re-added repeatedly, I don't support just listing the the three you mentioned, btw. current infobox is flawless.(] (]) 09:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC))
::::::::: That’s fine,. They aren’t meant to be taking literally but that majority of my comment is about the infobox and manny other points unrelated to the tripartite discussions. To find an actual number percentage is irrelevant. But again not the point and was talked about ad nauseam. My comment on using just the three axis powers was sarcastic to make a point of the ever increasing reduction of information. On your talk page however you said you would be for the 2017 version of the infobox granted we fix the dates which I would be for as well. If you think more information is better, than how would the current infobox be flawless as it leaves out a lot? Also it was a smal minority of editors that rejected the old version. ] (]) 12:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I think the infobox should be divided into two: a) the three Axis powers, and b) those that actually joined the Pact (Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Bulgaria, and the NDH). Yugoslavia's membership was only two days, and that doesn't justify being in the infobox and can be adequately covered in the body. Leave the rest out of the infobox. ] (]) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
**I'll add this what the Britannica article includes. ] (]) 05:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:::I agree with Yugoslavia not being worth listing but works as a little clickable note as is right now. Would it not be relevant have a subcategory denoting Slovakia and NDH being puppet states for the reader compared to other signers of the pact? Also what do you think of restoring this original long standing version </nowiki>]? Only adjustments would be date and separate categories for Puppet states and Pupet governments. Again to be as accurate as possible for the readers ] (]) 05:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
::::Whether the NDH or Slovakia were puppet states is debatable, we shouldn't be parsing this sort of thing in an infobox. ] (]) 05:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:::::Peacemaker67, Yugoslavia is not listed mainly, it is only mentioned in the notes, which is appropriate. I think the current infobox is fine.(] (]) 09:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC))
::::::{{ping|Peacemaker67}} I’m confused here. Didn’t you always state that NDH was a puppet state? As is the consensus of RS, articles about them And pretty much any book about them referring to them as a puppet state even the Nurnberg trials and so on? You had argued this on this talk page in the past that they were installed by the Axis powers and would survive otherwise. Also what do you think about going back to the long standing version as I linked </nowiki>] ? KIENGIR at told me in an other discussion that they would consider it if the dates were fixed.] (]) 12:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:*{{u|Peacemaker67}}, I would accept that but for the exclusion of Finland (and to a lesser extent Thailand). ] (]) 15:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Srnec}}I don’t see why Finland would be removed as Co-Belligerent being that other sources label them when talking about Axis Powers. Also could you make it an option on the RfC to choose the 2017 version (granted with tweaks to dates and such) like </nowiki>]? It gives editors more to choose from. ] (]) 16:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
::::Peacemaker implied the removal of Finland. If that isn't what he meant, he'll have to clarify. ] (]) 19:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:::::I see I misread. I thought you were advocating. However, what about my proposal of including the 2017 version (granted with tweaks to dates and such) like </nowiki>] in the RfC choices?. Thanks ] (]) 19:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
{{talk ref}}

Latest revision as of 02:36, 20 December 2024

Misplaced Pages requires that all content be verifiable, for this reason no country will be listed in the infobox as an Axis power unless independent, reliable sources on the topic of WW2 can be presented explicitly describing them as an Axis power. If you want a country to be included in the infobox, please find sources to support this before opening a discussion.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Axis powers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
? view · edit Frequently asked questions Q1: Why is country X included in the list of Axis countries in the infobox? A1: Because reliable sources, cited in the article, describe it as an Axis country. If you think that a country presently included in this list should NOT be included in it, please describe why reliable sources do not support it being included here, and if possible provide sources backing up this position. Particularly in the case of Finland, this has been discussed many, many times, so please review the talk-page archive to see if you have any new points to raise on this topic. Q2: Why is country X NOT included in the list of Axis countries included in the infobox? A2: Only the countries for which reliable sources have been found, describing the country unambiguously as a member of the Axis, should be included. If you think a country should be added to the list, please provide reliable sources that clearly and unambiguously state that they were members of the Axis. Please note that particularly Vichy France, Iraq, Spain, the Soviet Union, and the various puppet-states of the Axis outside of the ones that are included in this list have been discussed a large number of times here, so please review the discussions before opening a new discussion to see if the point you want to make has already been discussed. Q3: Why aren't only Tripartite Pact signatories included as Axis members in the infobox? A3: Because this article is not about the Tripartite Pact, which has its own article. Similarly, it is also not about the Anti-Comintern Pact. Instead it is about the Axis, which reliable sources describe as having a membership different to that of the Tripartite Pact and the Anti-Comintern Pact. Q4: Why aren't puppet states and colonies included as Axis members in the infobox? A4: Some puppet states may be included as members of the Axis powers where there are reliable sources stating that this is what they were, however, where no source says that a country was a member of the Axis, simply having been a puppet state or colony of a member of the Axis is insufficient to make it a member of the Axis if reliable sources do not describe it as such. Q5: Why are other states, that were not members of the Axis, discussed in the body-text of the article? A5: States and movements that had notable relations with the Axis, for example states the leadership of which gave serious consideration to joining the Axis, should be discussed to the extent relevant. Relevance should be decided in consensus with other editors - if in doubt, please discuss on the talk page here. Q6: Why was membership of the Axis, as listed in the infobox, decided to only include those clearly and unambiguously described as being members of the Axis in reliable sources? A6: In a discussion on the talk page in January 2021 it was decided to remove all countries which no reliable sources clearly described as being a member of the Axis. The reasoning was that by including countries that no reliable source actually identified as Axis powers but which some editors had characterised as "Axis co-belligerents", a term with no basis in reliable sources, we were essentially engaging in original research and going outside the topic of the article, which is about the Axis powers and not about wars fought parallel to the wars fought by the Axis. Q7: I disagree with the criteria used to determine what should be included as a member of the Axis in this article! A7: Consensus can change, please feel free to open a discussion here about how you think the article should address the question of which states should be included as members of the Axis in this article. Please also review the prior discussions in the archive to see whether your proposed way of deciding Axis membership has already been discussed.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconGermany High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternational relations High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / European / German / Italian / Japanese / World War II
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
German military history task force
Taskforce icon
Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
Taskforce icon
Japanese military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
WikiProject iconJapan: Military history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:18, January 11, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconItaly High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHungary High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAustria High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSlovakia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCroatia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAlbania Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconAxis powers is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Misplaced Pages visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomania Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconBulgaria Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFinland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinlandWikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconThailand Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Misplaced Pages. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFormer countries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
WikiProject iconJewish history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJudaism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed
Map needed
It is requested that a global map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Why is Iraq not listed in the infobox? They were a full-fledged member of the Axis. https://en.wikipedia.org/Anglo-Iraqi_War https://en.wikipedia.org/1941_Iraqi_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat Ironzombie39 (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The FAQ at the top says "Only the countries for which reliable sources have been found, describing the country unambiguously as a member of the Axis, should be included." As discussed previously, co-belligerents of the Axis are not considered members of the Axis and hence do not go in the infobox. The question of including Iraq in the infobox has also been discussed multiple times (see the archives), and consensus has also been against inclusion. Liu1126 (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
so we add Finland and croatia but not iraq?
I don't get your logic here Sanad real (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
iraq is literally blue on the map on the allies article Sanad real (talk) 01:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Sanad real. On Misplaced Pages, facts that can be challenged (which definitely includes which states were Axis powers) need to be clearly supported by reliable sources. Misplaced Pages, including the map on the page about the Allies, is not a reliable source.
For Iraq, there is no source saying it was ever a member of the Axis powers. If we look at what the sources say, we can see that it is not clearly considered to have been an Axis power during the few months that Rashid Ali was in power. For example, this source points out that Germany and Italy had no desire to make deals with Arab states since Italy wanted the Middle East as part of its empire and Germany saw the Arab states as a distration from its upcoming invasion of the USSR. The source also states that no formal alliance was ever concluded.
For Finland and Croatia, there are ample sources stating that they were members of the Axis powers which you can find in the article. For Iraq those sources don't appear to exist. If you are aware of a reliable source that clearly and unambiguously describes Iraq as a member of the Axis powers, please let us know. FOARP (talk) 07:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Issues with the map of participants in the info-box

Regarding the map of participants in the info-box, it contains inaccuracies:

  • The USSR is listed as having switched sides from the Axis to the Allies, which is in between complete falsehood and utter lunacy. Neither the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact nor the joint-but-time-offset German-Soviet invasion of Poland ever made the USSR a member of the Axis, especially not de jure.
  • Ethiopia is listed as having switched sides, but how can a colonial government (Italian East Africa) "switch sides" when it was disbanded altogether and replaced with a British military administration?
  • If Ethiopia is listed as having switches sides, then Italy should have certainty been included in the list as well, but it was not. The situation with the Italian Social Republic complicates the matter, but since France is already dealt with separately (on the map) in terms of Vichy France and German-occupied France, the same could be done with Italy (showing the Italian Social Republic borders at establishment in blue, and the rest of Italy in blue but with a "switched sides from the Axis to the Allies" marker).

212.243.68.210 (talk) 12:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Only Axis powers should be listed in the infobox in an article about the Axis powers

There was an extensive discussion about why the infobox only included actual members of the Axis. It's now been changed back to its previous format without any discussion as far as I can see. This is not a Paradox game or online games forum like NationStates, we need sources to describe a country positively as having been one of the Axis powers, not whatever idea someone has just come up with on their own about what the Axis was.

The second world war is almost certainly the most written-about subject in world history. If you cannot find a source explicitly stating that a country was one of the Axis powers (or similar language) then please consider that it may not have been an Axis power, and that your idea of what the Axis powers were does not match what reliable sources say about it. It is, in fact, not easy to find reliable sources that list the members of the Axis beyond Germany, Japan, and Italy, and NONE of the sources we've reviewed so far that do try to provide exhaustive lists of Axis members include the countries that people typically want to add to the infobox - they don't include Vichy France, they don't include the USSR, they don't include Iraq, they don't include Iran, they don't include Manchuria. However, they DO typically include Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, and Romania, and (less often) Croatia, Slovakia Thailand. You can review the sources that list Axis powers in the article, but the convenience of anyone reading this page, here's the main ones:

  • Facts About the American Wars, Bowman, p. 432 - This lists Albania, Bulgaria, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, and Thailand. It discusses Croatia as well but is a bit ambiguous about whether it was an Axis member. It mentions Iraq but does not define it as having been a member of the Axis, but instead as a "puppet state" of the Allies. It explicitly describes Spain as having been neutral. There is no mention at all of Vichy France here.
  • The Library of Congress World War II Companion, Wagner, Osborne, & Reyburn, p. 39 - this defines the Axis as including Germany, Italy, Japan, Croatia, Finland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia. Notably it does not mention Thailand. It also does not mention Iraq, Vichy France etc. as Axis countries.
  • Germany and the Axis Powers, DiNardo, particularly p.92-3 - this book does contain a list as such, and primarily focuses on Europe, but the following countries are explicitly described as Axis powers throughout the book: Germany, Italy, Japan, Finland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria. It is more equivocal about Slovakia and Croatia, describing them as puppet countries - this does not mean they were not Axis powers in the view of the author, but neither confirms that they were. There is no mention of Iraq, Vichy France, and the usual suspects, in the context of describing who was part of the Axis.

I could understand someone, based on the Bowman reference, wanting to add Albania, but since this does not match what other sources say about Albania in WW2 I'm inclined not to. Similarly I could understand someone wanting to remove Thailand since only Bowman includes in their list, though other sources appear to support this (see the sources in the section about Thailand, including the Thai historical dictionary). I can even understand just limiting the Axis to Germany, Italy, and Japan since many books/articles do only talk about those countries as "the Axis". What I can't understand is constantly trying to add Iraq/Vichy/USSR/whatever without any sources at all. FOARP (talk) 09:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Albania was invaded and occupied, Thailand was not. Slatersteven (talk) 11:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Generally agree Steve, but more to the point: no other source I've seen says Albania was a member of the Axis so Bowman seems an outlier here. FOARP (talk) 10:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
R3YBOl (talk) 22:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that they removed kingdom of iraq from the axis states meanwhile after the success of the iraqi coup detat in 1941 Iraq joined the axis states, Someone who deleted the article of the kingdom of iraq in this page, So I hope you guys fix it and thank you for your service Here the article for making it easy to copy and paste

Do you have evidence that they joined the Axis? The Banner talk 23:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 23:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Oxford commas. 64.189.18.44 (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Not clear what the request is. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. The Banner talk 16:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Maps

See Talk:Allies of World War II#Maps. -- Beland (talk) 07:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).

Categories: