| Revision as of 23:48, 28 September 2020 editSandbh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,221 edits →I apologise for acting like a bull in a china shop: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:15, 8 January 2025 edit undoJJMC89 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators345,044 editsm Changed protection settings for "Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard": Persistent sock puppetry ( (expires 06:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)) (indefinite))Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talk header|noarchives=yes|WT:AN|WT:ANB}} | {{talk header|noarchives=yes|WT:AN|WT:ANB}} | ||
| {{section sizes|Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard}} | |||
| {{section sizes|Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents}} | |||
| {{Central|text=several subpages of Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard redirect here.}} | |||
| {{tmbox | {{tmbox | ||
| | image = ] | | image = ] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
| * Discuss general issues at ''']'''. | * Discuss general issues at ''']'''. | ||
| * Report posting of personal information by following instructions at ''']'''. | * Report posting of personal information by following instructions at ''']'''. | ||
| * Request discussions need to be closed at ''']'''. | * Request discussions need to be closed at ''']'''. | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{press | {{press | ||
| Line 48: | Line 51: | ||
| |maxarchsize= 250000 | |maxarchsize= 250000 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ] | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Editable archives == | |||
| == Kevin Deutsch article editathon == | |||
| {{Courtesy link|Talk:Kevin Deutsch#The Rolling Stone correction to their Kevin Deutsch story}} | |||
| It seems that the ANI archive pages (e.g. ]) have section edit links. This is not normal on archive pages: is it something special to ANI, or a mistake somewhere? --] 🌹 (]) 19:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Needs admin attention to deal with problematic user snowfire. ] (]) 03:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Maybe {{tl|Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} can be taught to emit the flag to inhibit that, iff transcluded onto a "subpage" (or "a subpage containing the string 'archive'")? ] (]) 20:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :And you're warned for personal attacks. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 03:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::That wasn't too hard. Which means I probably broke something as a side-effect. Trouts of various sizes welcome as appropriate. ] (]) 16:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Added a courtesy link to the discussion in question. There appear to be more personal attacks with {{tq|But especially not that hater snowfire!}} in ]. —] ( ] • ] ) 03:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, it's suppressed the edit links, so {{ty}} for that. --] 🌹 (]) 21:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Broken code in blue "Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents" box == | |||
| Yeah we don't want to keep going. Let's just compromise like we agreed. Harassment not going to happen. ] (]) 04:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| At the bottom of it: | |||
| Here’s the ANI discussion: and the SPI investigation: Result: five socks blocked, including the OP here (FTIIIOhfive) and the commenter above (LaneyJfromHoward). -- ] (]) 08:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| <small>Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are ] automatically by ]. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the ] subpage.</small> | |||
| == Protection of ] page == | |||
| |- | class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; background: var(--color-inverted, #fff); text-align: center; font-size: 125%;" | '''''' | |||
| Hi there, | |||
| I'm not sure if this is possible but would we be able to protect the 'Cavoodle' page please. It keeps getting vandalised and redirected to the 'cross breed' page. Although they are not recognised by a number of kennel clubs, they are recognised as a designer breed. For example the are searched for on Google about five time the number of times people search for a 'Norwegian Lundehund' which has it's own page that does not receive vandalism. | |||
| There are a couple of bad eggs which have nothing better to do with their time than to vandalise pages they disagree with but I don't think they should be able to vandalise pages to give themselves a little sense of power. | |||
| Leo <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :{{u|LeoRussoLeo}}, this sort of request should be made at ]. ] (]) 13:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Pretty sure the "|- | class= " etc. bit isn't supposed to be there. -] <sub>]</sub> 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :{{ping|The Bushranger}} I think I fixed it. ] (]) 17:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :For the record, there is ], so if necessary the redirect will be the version protected. ] (]) 15:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|Primefac}}, ha - now I remember why this is so familiar, I temp-blocked LRL as one of my first SPI clerk tasks! Shame on me for forgetting about that. Might end up needing that indef after all... ] (]) 15:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| == Archiving unaddressed discussions after three days == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> to the page ] has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19#Misplaced Pages:REPORT}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 10:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Questions about TPA and UTRS notification following TPA removal == | |||
| After I reverted a bot archiving a report I filed here three days ago and that hasn't been addressed by an admin, {{u|GiantSnowman}} has reverted me. Why is this, and why can't a report remain on this noticeboard for ... I don't know, ''a week'', until it has received some attention from a non-involved editor or admin? ] (]) 12:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :You (disruptively - and twice!) reverted a bot archiving a large number of discussions, not just your own. If you want help, speak to me. ]] 12:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|JG66}}: ] in question strikes me as something that would be better handled at ]. –]] 12:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|xeno}}, thank you for the suggestion, and {{u|GiantSnowman}}, further to our discussion elsewhere. 'Fraid to say, I just see ] as yet another area that I'm completely unfamiliar with and looks so time-consuming to engage with. I say this after trying to get the issue addressed here and after having had what I considered a pretty solid case against the same user similarly ignored at AN/3RR last year. The editor's had past form at this noticeboard for ] on the same band's articles (eg, ]); seems to think information can remain unsourced for years; and insists that tacit acceptance of this outweighs key policies. (PaleCloudedWhite's opening statement at that linked AN/I discussion is uncannily spot on, btw, with regard to my experience of this user's approach both in 2019 and over the last week or so.) Yet here ''I am'', having to do all the work, just to get this behaviour and these latest policy violations addressed. | |||
| ::I'm tempted instead to just handle each album article in its own right. At ], it's stated: "Remove the template when you add a citation for a statement." Carliertwo reverted my edit(s), removing the tag, but did not add a source. I can open RfCs for specific examples of original research and puffery, I guess. I'd be happy to ping you both as and when but, really, this is pretty draining and stupid when all I'm trying to do is impose some basic principles that would never be challenged at any other music act's articles. ] (]) 14:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please re-post your case in brief on ANI main page (supported by links/diffs of the problematic behaviour) and ping me and I'll take a proper look! ]] 15:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Your feedback would be appreciated at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 22:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == I believe I’ve run into one of the usual suspects... == | |||
| ...but they aren’t doing the problematic behavior they are Best Known For. Report or wait until they starting acting up/out? ] (]) 00:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :IME if it's them and they know their sock is suspected, they'll stop using it. ] (]) 00:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::]? Never heard of him. <small>(and neither have you)</small> --<b>] ]</b> 03:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::One of the best unscripted police line-ups ever. -] ] 04:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == I apologise for acting like a bull in a china shop == | |||
| with respect to my allegations of incivil behaviour by ]. I'll discuss my remaining concerns with the individual editors involved. ] (]) 23:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:15, 8 January 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrators' noticeboard page. |
|
 |
|
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, several subpages of Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard redirect here. |
 | This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.
This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).
|
 | This noticeboard has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||
Index
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Editable archives
It seems that the ANI archive pages (e.g. Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1173) have section edit links. This is not normal on archive pages: is it something special to ANI, or a mistake somewhere? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} can be taught to emit the flag to inhibit that, iff transcluded onto a "subpage" (or "a subpage containing the string 'archive'")? DMacks (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- That wasn't too hard. Which means I probably broke something as a side-effect. Trouts of various sizes welcome as appropriate. DMacks (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it's suppressed the edit links, so
Thank you for that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it's suppressed the edit links, so
- That wasn't too hard. Which means I probably broke something as a side-effect. Trouts of various sizes welcome as appropriate. DMacks (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Broken code in blue "Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents" box
At the bottom of it:
Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are archived automatically by Lowercase sigmabot III. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the /Non-autoconfirmed posts subpage.
|- | class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; background: var(--color-inverted, #fff); text-align: center; font-size: 125%;" | Start a new discussion
Pretty sure the "|- | class= " etc. bit isn't supposed to be there. -The Bushranger One ping only 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger: I think I fixed it. Jip Orlando (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:REPORT" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:REPORT to the page Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages only reports what the sources say has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19 § Misplaced Pages:REPORT until a consensus is reached. 67.209.129.48 (talk) 10:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Questions about TPA and UTRS notification following TPA removal
Your feedback would be appreciated at WT:Blocking policy#Questions about TPA and UTRS notification following TPA removal. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Category: