| Revision as of 19:58, 1 December 2020 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2020/November. (BOT)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:17, 22 January 2025 edit undoZ. Patterson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,564 edits →ClueBot-related statements: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{skip to TOC}} | {{skip to TOC}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/ |
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/Facepalms | ||
| |format= | |format= | ||
| |age=99999 | |age=99999 | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| |archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
| <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
| == Question regarding ClueBot == | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
| Thank you for showing me the way of wiki ] (]) 20:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
| I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis == | |||
| Why the default are set to <code>|format=Y/F</code> when <code>format= %%i</code> is better according to the ]? | |||
| Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - ] (]) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Because ] to the documentation without updating ]. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. <span style="color:#dbb5ff;font:bold 125% 'Brush Script MT',cursive;padding-left:.75em;padding-right:.5em">— ] ]</span> 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :What? ] ] ] 00:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == ClueBot-related statements == | |||
| I have three statements about ClueBot Commons. | |||
| {{Ordered list|For some time, I have wondered if we should reinstate ] so it works alongside ] in finding and reverting vandalism. It has been on a WikiBreak for a long time, and I wondered if we should reinstate it and improve upon ClueBot so there would be two anti-vandalism bots working concurrently, similar to how we have ] and ] archiving pages.|When should an administrator switch ] to "True"? This bot has not been used since 2014, and I have wondered when ClueBot II will be back in service.|I am interested in helping review ClueBot NG's dataset to help identify vandalism and constructive edits in its corpus and to learn ]. I signed up for helping review the dataset, but my account is pending approval.}} ] (]) 03:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:17, 22 January 2025
| Skip to table of contents |
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Not running - last edit was User talk:2600:6C4E:3040:225A:49DF:FA95:DA43:C00E 7450s ago
The current status of ClueBot III is: Not running - last edit was User talk:Bgsu98 28701s ago
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis
Why the default are set to |format=Y/F when format= %%i is better according to the documentation?
Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - Ivan530 (Talk) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Because someone added that comment to the documentation without updating User:ClueBot III/JustArchiveThis. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. — Naomi Amethyst 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
ClueBot-related statements
I have three statements about ClueBot Commons.
- For some time, I have wondered if we should reinstate ClueBot so it works alongside ClueBot NG in finding and reverting vandalism. It has been on a WikiBreak for a long time, and I wondered if we should reinstate it and improve upon ClueBot so there would be two anti-vandalism bots working concurrently, similar to how we have ClueBot III and Lowercase sigmabot III archiving pages.
- When should an administrator switch ClueBot II/Run to "True"? This bot has not been used since 2014, and I have wondered when ClueBot II will be back in service.
- I am interested in helping review ClueBot NG's dataset to help identify vandalism and constructive edits in its corpus and to learn machine learning. I signed up for helping review the dataset, but my account is pending approval.