| Revision as of 18:04, 8 January 2007 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 edits →Inshaneee: Hynosadist's remarks seem... unhelpful. Removing.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:06, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,457 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|- |
|
|
|
|counter = 14 |
|
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
|
|
|algo = old(7d) |
|
|- |
|
|
|
|archive = User talk:Zscout370/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User_talk:Zscout370/Archive_7--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
|
|
|
}} |
|
---- |
|
---- |
|
{| align="center" |
|
{| align="center" |
| Line 22: |
Line 23: |
|
* ] |
|
* ] |
|
* ] |
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|}<!--Template:Talkarchives--> |
|
|}<!--Template:Talkarchives--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
==Hellenic Air Force Roundel.svg== |
|
|
|
== WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call) == |
|
Hi, could you upload this image to Misplaced Pages Commons please? ] 12:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Give me several hours; I'm at a place where the Internet connection is spotty, at best. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 13:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sorry to trouble you. I found another variant on commons - "Grecja-roundel.svg". However I would like to ask you for '''Roundel of the Philippines Air Force.svg''' instead, if thats ok ] 13:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I can still upload both, I just need to get somewhere that I can get a better internet connection. Misplaced Pages doesn't load for me half of the time. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 13:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Thanks! No hurry. ] 14:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I uploaded the second photo. I am still debating about the Greece roundel image. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Thanks a lot for uploading it! ] 12:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{|{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on ]. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--]}}|} |
|
== Can you pls help == |
|
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0386 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call) == |
|
Can you look into this link below (as you've already had an idea about the issue) and help resolve it? Thanks <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000">] (])</span> 18:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{|{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on ]. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--]}}|} |
|
] |
|
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0394 --> |
|
:I am going to get some more eyeballs to look at this, because it seems that what I am doing in ineffective. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The GAN ''Newsletter'' (November 2012) == |
|
== About your deletion of ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| align="center" style="font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; border: 2px solid #CCCCCC; width:100%" cellpadding="5" |
|
The reason for deletion was: "''blatent copyright violation from http://news.yahoo.com/photo/061230/ids_photos_wl/r2543073752.jpg''", however I wonder why this image does not falls under fair use criteria of a not replaceable TV screenshot of a significant historical event? --] <sup>(])</sup> 23:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|- |
|
:The image came from Reuters, of their images. Plus since the image came out less than 3 days ago, the agency, among others, are selling the photograph to other agencies. By us having it, we will fail in the 4th requirement for the image to be fair use. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| |
|
::Well I have to say that first of all Reuters does not own copyright because it's a screenshot from the iraqi tv, so the iraqi station own the copyright, thought that's irrelevant at this point because the image is used under ], which "''permit the use of copyrighted material on Misplaced Pages under a restricted set of criteria''" when the content is not freely available. An example to this use of copyrighted material is ], which shows the newspaper headline (copyrighted content) of a important historic event under fair use. --] <sup>(])</sup> 04:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{User:Hahc21/sandbox/Newsletter/Banner|volume=III|issue=2|month=November 2012}} |
|
:::When I checked the image, it was being sold by Iraq TV to Reuters and the AP, and all three well selling the image. We still cannot use it yet. They are still selling the image. Give it about 6 months and I will have no objections. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|} |
|
::::Another hint, someone uploaded a copy of the photo to the ]. We cannot host fair use on the Commons at all, so even if down the road that we can use the Saddam hanging photo, we cannot have it on the Commons. What will most likely happen is after a few weeks, when the newsworthyness of the photo is gone, I will restore it. It has the source info, we have image undeletion, so give me about 5 weeks and I will restore it. Agreed? ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|} |
|
:::::Sure, that's fine with me. --] <sup>(])</sup> 11:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
| |
|
|
{| align="center" style="width: 100%; font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; width:100%" cellpadding="5" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|colspan="2" style="width: 50%;"|<big>'''In This Issue'''</big> |
|
|
------- |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma;"| |
|
|
*'''Request for Comment''': ] has been started this month. Go and voice your opinions! |
|
|
*Featured editorial: ] |
|
|
*Project News: ] |
|
|
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma; border-left: 2px solid #CCCCCC;"| |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*GA Task Forces: ] |
|
|
*Member News: ] |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
-------------------<br> |
|
|
<center><div class="hlist"> |
|
|
* '''Read this newsletter''' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* Newsletter delivered by ''']''' (]) · 3 November 2012 |
|
|
</div></center><br> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
== The WikiProject: Good Articles ''Newsletter'' (December 2012) == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| align="center" style="font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; border: 2px solid #CCCCCC; width:100%" cellpadding="5" |
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
| |
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/Banner (December Version)|volume=III|issue=3|month=December 2012}} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| |
|
|
{| align="center" style="width: 100%; font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; width:100%" cellpadding="5" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|colspan="2" style="width: 50%;"|<big>'''In This Issue'''</big> |
|
|
------- |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma;"| |
|
|
*Featured editorial: ] |
|
|
*]: A ''']''' is being held now at GAN. |
|
|
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma; border-left: 2px solid #CCCCCC;"| |
|
|
*]: Our picks for November, 150+ promotions. |
|
|
*GA Task Forces: ] |
|
|
*Member News: ] |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
-------------------<br> |
|
|
<center><div class="hlist"> |
|
|
* '''Read this newsletter''' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* Newsletter delivered by ''']''' (]) · 3 December 2012 |
|
|
</div></center><br> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013 == |
|
I 4got to check with you if you got the wma file. --] (]•]) 00:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Just caught me eating dinner, so I will check in a few minutes. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 00:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::O, I thought of it being sent last Friday. No? maybe today, if Nox gets the chance to go on-line. First day back to work after the holidays...--] (]•]) 01:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Nope, didn't get it yet. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Hey. Forwarded Nox email to you just now. Pls check and msg me when you get it. Thanks. --] (]•]) 00:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/February 2013/Delivery}} |
|
== Please speedily undelete my user-subpage == |
|
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0460 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Good Article Nominations Request For Comment == |
|
Please immediately ] my user-subpage ] that you "out of process" speedily deleted at 03:44 this morning . I can see no proper basis for you deleting my user-subpage; it did not contain the image in question and was simply a record of the copyright justification prior to deletion so I could sleep on the matter before deciding if I wanted to take the issue further. The process for requesting a user page deletion is described at ]. ] 18:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Restored, sorry about that. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Good. Do you also accept that as ] had both a fair-use template and a ''Fair Use Rationale'' section, and that ] had commenced the ] process, you were wrong to speedily delete that image, and the proper thing to do would have been to let the IfD process run? (I do have sympathy with your argument that Reuters could be marketing the image so fair-use was invalid - but that argument should have been made in the IfD discussion.) I struggle to think of a reason for you to delete my user-subpage other than to remove evidence regarding your speedy delete of ] - please explain. ] 09:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| {{WP:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=A ''' ']' '''for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found ]. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) ]. |
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this time, '''Proposal 1, 3, and 5''' have received full (or close to) support. |
|
Err.. why are you reverting edits by ]? It looks like he's just archiving old discussions to ]. ] 04:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:I see it now, it would be helpful that he is saying "I am archiving this" instead of just blanking the page without any comment. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 04:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Alright, thanks... ] 04:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I also replied to OF's email, so he should be unblocked by now. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 04:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the ''General discussion'' thread. |
|
== What is your reason and authority for indefinitely blocking ]? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that '''Proposal 2''' has been '''withdrawn''' and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard '''Proposal 9''' as it was never an actual proposal.}} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0482 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Good article reassessment for ] == |
|
i see no discussion of this at ArbCom or ANI or anywhere. what gives you that authority? there is something very sinister going on here and ArcCom will be hearing about it soon. ] 05:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:The administrators have the ability to block people for any length of time. Your friend, Nkras, was reposting content that was previously deleted under our policies. After being told not told, he did so anyways and promised to keep doing it. Because of his intent to disrupt Misplaced Pages, I had no choice to block him indefinitely. Plus, indefinite blocks do not have to first discussed on ANI or ArbCom. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 05:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:: he is not my friend even though he "thanked" me for comments i put on his talk page and i agree with him only marginally (almost not at all) on content regarding the article ]. i cannot find any discussion of the degree of abuse except on his talk page and that is thin. i dunno where you come from but this indefinite block is playing right into the hands of his content opponents and this is, in effect, a block because of content dispute. |
|
|
:: i am no neophyte here, and unless you do the right thing here, Fred Bauder and other ArbCommissioners are going to hear about this. this is systemic bias at it's ugliest. ] 05:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I am inclined not to lift the block. He was warned plenty of times. Also, read my comment in the next section about the details of the block. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Nkras' block== |
|
|
|
|
|
Although theatrical language like "something sinister going on" is of course out of place, I also support a review of the indefinite block on ]. After his initial clumsy behavior at ], he de-escalated the situation himself and participated in the successful, collegial revision of the article's opening. I believe the attempted recreation of ] was also in good faith, as this was discussed during the afd. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 05:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:The problem is that he was asked to not do it, yet he still did. The one that caused the indefinite block was the following message when he decided to recreate the article at ]: "18:42, 3 January 2007 . . Nkras (Talk | contribs | block) (Creation of Marriage (traditional). Deletion of this article without discussion, even by Admins, will be considered prima facie POV.)" If something was deleted because of AFD, then he should have gone to ], not recreate the article across Misplaced Pages under several names. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 05:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: and he'll learn. a 24 or 48 hour block might have sent a message, but the indefinite block says that "Nkras cannot get the message so why try?" the indefiniteness of the block is disproportionate and just wrong. i'm too tired to file a RFA now (01:13 hours EST), but i hope you will save us all a lot of time and headache and fix this before i get the energy to act on this. ] 06:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::As I said above, I am not going to lift the block. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I was also someone on the opposite side of the fence from Nkras on most issues, but I still am shocked that he was blocked indefinitely, and think it was a gross overreaction. I would hope that this decision will be reversed, as Nkras, while being somewhat problematic at the beginning of his editing here, was a major force in resolving the conflict on the Marriage article. If he is unblocked, I will be the first to welcome him back. We had strong differences of opinion, but he certainly had my respect for his ability to compromise in order to achieve consensus. ] 09:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*I further think that protecting the Tradiditonal Marriage pages is heavy handed, to say the least. Several people, myself included, said that the topic itself was certainly worthy of an article, just not the article that was copied from Marriage itself. Now anyone who wants to write about the development of the term as used for political purposes is blocked from writing it. ] 09:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:I had no hand in the protection, that would have to be discussed with the protecting admin, who is on vacation. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Well, you have made your position clear about your block of Nikras, so I shall, as well. I find it to be heavy handed, and entirely disproportionate to his transgression. I further find it troubling that you and other admins block users without explaining to them (many of whom are new or relatively new) what their options are in the situation. I once again request you unblock him. I also plan on submitting this to ] and ]. ] 21:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I won't unblock. The only options that this user really has is to convince me that he needs an unblock. He can do that via email, which is listed at my userpage on MetaWiki (see the link on my userpage). Other than that, his options are slim. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::One more thing, he can still post at his talk page. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
==Execution of Saddam== |
|
|
http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/01/01/wld02.asp |
|
|
hi |
|
|
Saddam died at 6:10, this guy kept on reverting and making things wrong... Iraq official death certificate is 6:10, died 6:05... http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/01/01/wld02.asp . Also that guy removed saddam's link to his last hours, all those should go back. en.wikipedia.org/Saddam_hussein You should block this guy who kept on reversing everything. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein&diff=98515213&oldid=98514518 is best version, see what can be done asap. you can go on talk page yourself and waste time. |
|
|
:I am not going get involved with that. Take your battle elsewhere. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
<p>So who the h... made you administrator, you seem a hypocrite, you just did something over there with some page photo. |
|
|
:All I did was I removed the photos from the articles for being copyright violations. I have no interest in finding out what time did he die. There is a post at ] and on the talk page of Saddam's article. There is nothing much I can add and I won't be any use at those pages. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Zach, please check if the stub can now be removed from the article. Also, the source for the IHMS song is already in the file. Please check so we can make the necessary correction. (BTW, let me know if you got the email re Lupang Hinirang). --] (]•]) 01:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Removing stub tags now. Email received. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 02:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::As for the song of the IHMS, was it emailed to you guys or did you download it somewhere? Regardless, list it on the page of the file. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 03:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::The composer, Fr. Roland Pacudan, also posted it Pls check if that is okey.--] (]•]) 04:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Re the Lupang Hinirang, I just listened to the wma file now, I did not know it was so "scratchy" or noisy. Why? old age? LoL! You've managed to lessen the noise? Is it better? --] (]•]) 04:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Arbeit Macht Frei, offensive imagery: ] == |
|
|
].]] |
|
|
This image is deeply offensive to me and to many others. |
|
|
The persistent upload and re-creation of this image, now under a new name, has been done to circumvent a prevented protection and block of same. It is now renamed "Welcome3.gif" |
|
|
I have already told the author that I find it deeply offensive. He has also been warned by a total of 3 admins so far. He has been told that if he keeps uploading it, he will be blocked without further warning. The warning was: '''"If you do one more such edit you ''will'' be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages."''' I ask that you please block him now and please delete this image for the last and final time. He has been given a lot of warnings and the image has been deleted many times before, but he keeps flouting the rules. - ] 03:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Blocked for 48 hours. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 04:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== request for arbitration. == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arbitration has been requested for a dispute that you are or may be involved in. please see ] ] 04:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== About your removal of the fair use photo on ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
You deleted the image, but to me it seems like a fair use image according to ], under the overview of |
|
|
* "critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." - Yeah, it does that. |
|
|
* the execution is as notorious the "Muhammad cartoons newspaper scan", being the subject of worldwide discussion. Basically, it's not replacable with a free alternative and contains analysis and commentary. |
|
|
|
|
|
It also fits the policy as: |
|
|
* No free equivilent exists |
|
|
* Won't replace the original market, since it's only a screenshot |
|
|
* It was low-resolution |
|
|
* It has been previously published |
|
|
* It is encyclopaedic |
|
|
* Meets the media-specific requirements |
|
|
* Was used in an article |
|
|
* Contributes significantly to the article (adds /A LOT/ to it) |
|
|
* Used in article namespace |
|
|
* Contained proper attribution |
|
|
|
|
|
If you disagree (which I have a feeling you might), could you advise as to where to go to get a second opinion? I think it's an iconic, important, informative image that should to be placed on the page -] 08:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:The reason why I deleted the image is that the image is fairly recent and is being sold by Iraq TV, Reuters and the AP. Under the fair use laws of the US, we cannot have the photo '''yet''' because the news agencies are still selling the photo. We are hurting the market value of the photo and we cannot host it because of it. As I told others, give us about 4 weeks and I can have the original Saddam hanging video restored. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 11:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Whaaaaaaaaaaat??!!== |
|
|
|
|
|
You have more than 20,000 edits. =D Nothing I was just aghast. =)) ] 10:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Misplaced Pages Week == |
|
|
|
|
|
The best existing proposal I can, in my own limited way, think of for the previously discussed "appreciation week" can now be found at ]. Any comments or responses would be more than welcome. ] 15:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! I placed the template US interactive map on the Paring Bol-anon USA section. Will you please check if that is all right and/or move to a best position? Thank you...--] (]•]) 22:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:The location is fine. I am going to email you the OGG file we discussed earlier now. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Got the email! BTW, What is the best player to play ogg? --] (]•]) 23:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I use ] (to get the OGG codec version, you need to go to the Winamp website and click the player to download. Click "get basic" then click "full." ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Thank you. Will do...--] (]•]) 00:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Download successfully done! Thank you for the step-by-step process. I am using it now. --] (]•]) 02:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
<p>Saddam timing is important, what do you mean by immaculate heart of mary?Is that part of rosary? |
|
|
:Er, what is this about? the seminary?--] (]•]) 00:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Pinay, ignore the last banter. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== FYI == |
|
|
|
|
|
Just wondering if you've read .--] (]•]) 06:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
: O, and is a version of the UP Concert Chorus. --] (]•]) 06:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::As for the blog, yes I read it before. I left comments on it before. I seen the soundclick page before, but haven't gotten anything from them yet. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== seals == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! when you get slack time, do you think you can improve the seals of the ] and the ]? Let me know...Thanks. --] (]•]) 18:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|
==Nkras== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|
Just letting you know that I decided to try unblocking him. See ]. Basically I feel that, it's worth given him a second chance. ] | ] 00:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> |
|
:Sounds fine. I will keep watch, but won't do any more blockings. I still believe that my original blocking should be a wake-up call for Nkras and that he knows that he has the community watching him. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|
|
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|
== Images with permission == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
"these images are speedy deleted by order of ] since May of 2005" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
: Can you provide a pointer to this order and the rationale for it? If we have permission to use an image, we can use the image. Seems pretty clear to me. — ] 04:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
::The Order can be read at (which is linked on my userpage too). I do not know why he personally did this decision, I cannot peer into his mind and find out why. What I, and Jimbo, meant by "by permission only" images is that Misplaced Pages, and only Misplaced Pages, can use the content. Misplaced Pages's content is copied by various websites, including images. That would put mirrors into a bind, plus, if we want to make a Misplaced Pages DVD, we can't use those images. I hope this helps. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 10:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> |
