Misplaced Pages

Talk:Privatization: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:16, 9 July 2024 edit79.166.6.229 (talk) →Why no mention of how privatization is imposed upon poorer countries?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:40, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,528 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|age=90|bot=ClueBot III}} {{Talk header}}
{{American English}} {{American English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

Latest revision as of 15:40, 10 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Privatization article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBusiness Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEconomics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Libertarianism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconSociology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


We should put the opinions from IGM Forum European Economists

Absolute Majority agreed about Privatization in Eastern Europe which was strong Positive Some economists wrote down "this is No brainer" I think this source is useful http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/privatization-in-central-and-eastern-europe Shfur0306 (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Privatization unquestionably allowed corruption to take greater hold in eastern europe. The mechanism is obvious: while state capitalism implied concentrated corruption intranationally, privatization allowed corruption to flow into these countries internationally.
Eastern europe is not filled with miracle economies like the spanish miracle or the chinese miracle. The contrast should be obvious, and it would have been famous otherwise. Houseratz (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

they lies if they sad. The boss is in the jsilhe can't be injail Because ittreind of then.boss and boy soliestheylessonthem instead oofme Because it my power 41.116.8.232 (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

the man's are jelouse all of them.that got gurus and that don't have gurus so liesabout boss helping themfor4000peoplesthat staying with my enemies soliesabdhoy foessamething behind my back no body injail lies it theirfreind 41.116.8.232 (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Why no mention of how privatization is imposed upon poorer countries?

There is a specific mechanism created by IMF, World Bank and USA to impose privatizations on the poorer countries, it even has an article here in wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/Washington_Consensus

So, why is there no mention here? This article is like as if privatization is a matter of taste. It's not! 79.166.6.229 (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Categories: