Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitextInline

Revision as of 02:16, 8 February 2014 editTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits →3RR warning← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:17, 8 February 2014 edit undoTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits →3RR warning: c/eNext edit →
Line 1,471:		Line 1,471:
	This is the required warning that you have reached three reverts at ]. A fourth revert will result in a ] violation. --] (]) 02:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)		This is the required warning that you have reached three reverts at ]. A fourth revert will result in a ] violation. --] (]) 02:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
	:] does not mean ]. When we have four excerpts all saying the same thing with slightly different words, that's repetitive and redundant. Misplaced Pages is not supposed to have bad writing and bad organization any more than would a college paper or an ]. And there's no reason whatsoever to bury a negative review in the middle rather than breaking it out separately. And there's no reason not to group related thoughts. These are just basic tenets of good writing, let alone about trimming an indiscriminate glob that hurts Misplaced Pages by turning what should be a neutral section into a hype-y fan page. ] says when your bold edit is reverted, discuss it on the talk page. At least two editors are already there discussing it. We'd welcome your discussion. --] (]) 02:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)		:] does not mean ]. When we have four excerpts all saying the same thing with slightly different words, that's repetitive and redundant. Misplaced Pages is not supposed to have bad writing and bad organization any more than would a college paper or an ] article. For instance, there's no reason whatsoever to bury a negative review in the middle rather than breaking it out separately. And there's no reason not to group related thoughts. These are just basic tenets of good writing, let alone about trimming an indiscriminate glob that hurts Misplaced Pages by turning what should be a neutral section into a hype-y fan page. ] says when your bold edit is reverted, discuss it on the talk page. At least two editors are already there discussing it. We'd welcome your discussion. --] (]) 02:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)