Misplaced Pages

WikiIslam: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:43, 17 March 2021 view sourceSnuish2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,291 edits added citation to intro← Previous edit Revision as of 16:12, 17 March 2021 view source Snuish2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,291 edits added sourceNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006.<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} It was founded by ], an Iranian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, ].<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006.<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} It was founded by ], an Iranian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, ].<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}}


WikiIslam described its purpose as "collect facts relating to the criticism of Islam from valid Islamic sources without the effect of censorship that is common in ]" and claims to have started as a result of the difficulty in "presenting 'correct' (i.e., critical) information on ."<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} In drawing a contrast to Misplaced Pages, the website declared that "opinions critical of Islam" would not be censored on WikiIslam "for political correctness."<ref name="CIWI"/>{{rp|57}} To be "critical," as used on WikiIslam, referred to holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam.<ref name="CIWI"/>{{rp|57|quote=Those who call up the homepage are also reminded that this is a critical site and that it does not contain any pro-Islamic content. In this specific context, to be critical is to hold a preconceived and negative opinion about Islam and Muslims.}} WikiIslam described its purpose as "collect facts relating to the criticism of Islam from valid Islamic sources without the effect of censorship that is common in ]" and claims to have started as a result of the difficulty in "presenting 'correct' (i.e., critical) information on ."<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gardell |first1=Mattias |title=Islamofobi |date=2012 |publisher=Leopard |isbn=978-9173434027 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Islamofobi/vC6bCwAAQBAJ |quote=WikiIslam – en 'islamkritisk encyklopedi' som skapades av antimuslimska cyberaktivister som slutit sig till att deras inlägg på Misplaced Pages 'censurerades' av politiskt korrekta redaktörer och motsades av muslimer som lade sig i samtalet om islam och muslimer – anser att 'termen islamofobi är avledande, uppeggande och ofta används för att förhindra mycket legitim kritik av islam'.}}</ref> In drawing a contrast to Misplaced Pages, the website declared that "opinions critical of Islam" would not be censored on WikiIslam "for political correctness."<ref name="CIWI"/>{{rp|57}} To be "critical," as used on WikiIslam, referred to holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam.<ref name="CIWI"/>{{rp|57|quote=Those who call up the homepage are also reminded that this is a critical site and that it does not contain any pro-Islamic content. In this specific context, to be critical is to hold a preconceived and negative opinion about Islam and Muslims.}}


In December 2015, the ] claimed they had taken over ownership and operation of WikiIslam.<ref name="EXMNA">{{Cite web|title=Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam|url=https://exmuslims.org/ex-muslims-north-america-takes-ownership-operation-wikiislam/|date=2015-12-03|website=Ex-Muslims of North America|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-26}}</ref>{{bsex|date=February 2021|reason=This potentially violates the WP:SELFSOURCE requirement that self-published sources not discuss third parties}} In December 2015, the ] claimed they had taken over ownership and operation of WikiIslam.<ref name="EXMNA">{{Cite web|title=Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam|url=https://exmuslims.org/ex-muslims-north-america-takes-ownership-operation-wikiislam/|date=2015-12-03|website=Ex-Muslims of North America|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-26}}</ref>{{bsex|date=February 2021|reason=This potentially violates the WP:SELFSOURCE requirement that self-published sources not discuss third parties}}

Revision as of 16:12, 17 March 2021

Anti-Islamic wiki owned by Ex-Muslims of North America
WikiIslam
WikiIslam's logo
Available in8 languages
List of languagesEnglish
Turkish
French
Italian
Polish
Azerbaijani
Uzbek
Russian
OwnerEx-Muslims of North America
Founder(s)Ali Sina
URLwikiislam.net
Launched4 September 2006; 18 years ago (2006-09-04)
Current statusActive
Content licenseCC-BY-NC 3.0
Part of a series on
Islamophobia
No mosque
Issues
Status by country
ExamplesAttacks on mosques:

Genocide:

Massacres, torture, expulsion:

Other incidents:

Media
Opposition

WikiIslam is a wiki focused on Islam-related content that has been described by scholars and writers as Islamophobic, anti-Muslim, and anti-Islam. WikiIslam was founded by Ali Sina in 2006 and was acquired by the Ex-Muslims of North America in 2015. As a "community-edited" website, WikiIslam's registered users may modify and edit its content.

Overview

The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006. It was founded by Ali Sina, an Iranian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, Faith Freedom International.

WikiIslam described its purpose as "collect facts relating to the criticism of Islam from valid Islamic sources without the effect of censorship that is common in Misplaced Pages" and claims to have started as a result of the difficulty in "presenting 'correct' (i.e., critical) information on ." In drawing a contrast to Misplaced Pages, the website declared that "opinions critical of Islam" would not be censored on WikiIslam "for political correctness." To be "critical," as used on WikiIslam, referred to holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam.

In December 2015, the Ex-Muslims of North America claimed they had taken over ownership and operation of WikiIslam.

As a "community-edited website," WikiIslam may be edited and modified by its registered users.

Critiques

In 2007, theologian Göran Larsson argued that the website should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal, noted that it commits selection bias by collecting only negative or critical material, and characterized the website as "strongly anti-Muslims and anti-Islam." His article in Contemporary Islam states that "In relation to the criteria set up by the Runnymede Trust ... it should be quite easy to label most of the material published on WikiIslam as expressions of Islamophobia." Larsson added that "my impression is that the stories reported by WikiIslam have merely been selected to show that Muslims are ignorant, backward or even stupid" and observed that the website encouraged visitors to criticize Muslims and spread negative information about them. However, because WikiIslam contained a list of links to other websites, such as that of the Middle East Media Research Institute, the article notes that "it becomes much more difficult to argue that all information posted on WikiIslam is Islamophobic by nature."

In 2013, both Daniel Enstedt and Göran Larsson wrote that the apostasy testimonies on WikiIslam were a part of a "negative and biased" representation of Islam and "an important element in an Islamophobic world view that presents Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all other world views." The authors remarked that despite the material on WikiIslam being "presented as authentic" and derived from Islamic sources and Muslim spokespersons, the selection and presentation was "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented." They explained that because the website highlighted skewed perceptions of Muslims and Islam, it "is often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic."

In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites," WikiIslam's apparent aim was described as "present Islamic history, theology, and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith, discouraging them from either taking up or continuing its practice. The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics."

In 2019, Asma Uddin described WikiIslam as a "rampantly anti-Muslim website." Also in 2019, Syaza Shukri expressed that the lack of positive content on the website demonstrated a "definite agenda" and that WikiIslam promoted a monolithic version of Islam, both violent and oppressive, unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion."

Notes

  1. Larsson's view was summarized by Ruth Tsuria, an expert on Islamophobia and digital media: "Larsson argues that WikiIslam takes a closed attitude in its understanding of Islam, and so should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal." Tsuria, Ruth (2013-01-01). "The video Three Things About Islam: Islamophobia online or a religious dialogue". Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. 25: 225. doi:10.30674/scripta.67442. ISSN 2343-4937.

References

  1. ^ Larsson, Göran (1 June 2007). "Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam". Contemporary Islam. 1 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2. ISSN 1872-0226. S2CID 144896607.
  2. ^ Enstedt, Daniel; Larsson, Göran (2013). "Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net" (PDF). CyberOrient. 7 (1): 64–93. doi:10.1002/j.cyo2.20130701.0003. ISSN 1804-3194. Retrieved 12 July 2020.
  3. ^ Larsson, Göran (2014). "Islamophobia or Legitimate Concern? Contrasting Official and Populist Understanding of Opposition to Muslims". In Mays, Christin; Deland, Mats; Minkenberg, Michael (eds.). In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe. Vienna: Lit Verlag. pp. 155–66. ISBN 9783643905420. OCLC 881140905.
  4. ^ Shukri, Syaza Farhana Mohamad (2019). "The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study". Islamophobia Studies Journal. 5 (1): 61–75. doi:10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061. ISSN 2325-8381. JSTOR 10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061. ...specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda...WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.
  5. ^ Uddin, Asma T. (2019). When Islam Is Not a Religion: Inside America's Fight for Religious Freedom (First Pegasus Books hardcover ed.). New York. ISBN 978-1643131740. The rampantly anti-Muslim website, WikiIslam, connects Islam and pedophilia even more brazenly, 'Pedophilia is permitted in the Qur'an, was practiced by Prophet Muhammad and his companions, and some Muslims today continue to commit the crime, following their prophet's example.'{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. ^ "Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam". Ex-Muslims of North America. 2015-12-03. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  7. Gardell, Mattias (2012). Islamofobi. Leopard. ISBN 978-9173434027. WikiIslam – en 'islamkritisk encyklopedi' som skapades av antimuslimska cyberaktivister som slutit sig till att deras inlägg på Misplaced Pages 'censurerades' av politiskt korrekta redaktörer och motsades av muslimer som lade sig i samtalet om islam och muslimer – anser att 'termen islamofobi är avledande, uppeggande och ofta används för att förhindra mycket legitim kritik av islam'.

External links

Categories: