| Revision as of 17:16, 25 March 2021 editDallavid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users746 edits →AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 25 March 2021 edit undoDallavid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users746 edits →AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ||
| == ] notification: ] has a new comment == | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> ] | |||
| I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at ]. Thanks! ~ ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 10:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC) </div> | |||
| == ] notification: ] has a new comment == | == ] notification: ] has a new comment == | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 25 March 2021
Dallavid, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Dallavid! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new comment
Proposed deletion of The Right To Struggle
The article The Right To Struggle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Current Version + WP:BEFORE does not give me any result which could establish sufficient notability per WP:NBOOK
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
I blocked your account from editing User talk:CuriousGolden for a week. Please consider this as a last warning. I do not see so many useful contribution from your account, and this talk page is full of warning, but I do see some harassment. If you want to continue editing Misplaced Pages please stop doing what you are doing now and start contributing constructively.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Could you explain to me why? In what way have I harassed? A month ago I said something I regret writing but in the Regarding Hayanist subtopic I said nothing that can be classified as harassment, no? Could you justify your decision? @Ymblanter:
- Your general tone on that page is really disgusting, and, in addition, you continue posting there even after you were asked to stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- What do you mean by my tone is really disgusting? Could you give an example? Perhaps I was pressing since CuriousGolden didn't respond to what I answered to him. For example he claimed x, I refute what he says then he changes the topic. Regarding "in addition, you were asked to stop", the only reason I was on his talk page was because he was constantly undoing my edits and previously he had threatened to block in case other people continued to undo him undoing edits. He could've messaged me on my talk page after I undid him undoing my edits (if that makes sense), there wouldn't have been a difference. By the way, I have a question, is the tone I am using now really disgusting? @Ymblanter:
- Look, - is he under obligation to reply to your messages at his talk page? How come that a removal of a reliable source can be justified in this way? How is this not shouting? How is pinging a user every time posting on his talk page constructive?--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Regarding your first point, it turned out that one of the sources he listed didn't even exist so I rightfully removed it, and the other two were alleged quotes from a book that he could've at least posted a link to like he did with the "Rediscovering Armenia" book. Regarding second point, he was undoing my edit and I was restoring them so before he threatened to block me for edit warring (which I should add that he did earlier to other people, I can post a link if you don't believe me), I decided to continue the dispute on his talk page. Regarding me shouting, I didn't mean it in a rude way, which I even stated in a previous comment. I simply was tired of refuting his claims just for him to change the subject so I capitalized on my last point. Regarding pinging a user, isn't that how it sends someone a notification? When he replied he never pinged me so I had to frequently check his talk page in order to see if he had responded. Now that I've answered your questions, I'd like to ask why you blocked me for something I said 1 month ago that wasn't even relevant to the (then) current dispute? I'd like to ask why, when I pinged you to resolve this dispute since he didn't reply to any of my points and changed the subject, you didn't respond for two days however when Curious complained to you, you responded relatively quickly and blocked me? In his talk page I wrote and linked to his blatant pro-Azerbaijani bias several times which wasn't at all objective, and assuming you read the dispute on his talk page, this would've mean more than enough of a reason to warn/block him. However instead, you chose to block me for something I said a month ago? @Ymblanter:
- Look, - is he under obligation to reply to your messages at his talk page? How come that a removal of a reliable source can be justified in this way? How is this not shouting? How is pinging a user every time posting on his talk page constructive?--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- What do you mean by my tone is really disgusting? Could you give an example? Perhaps I was pressing since CuriousGolden didn't respond to what I answered to him. For example he claimed x, I refute what he says then he changes the topic. Regarding "in addition, you were asked to stop", the only reason I was on his talk page was because he was constantly undoing my edits and previously he had threatened to block in case other people continued to undo him undoing edits. He could've messaged me on my talk page after I undid him undoing my edits (if that makes sense), there wouldn't have been a difference. By the way, I have a question, is the tone I am using now really disgusting? @Ymblanter:
- Your general tone on that page is really disgusting, and, in addition, you continue posting there even after you were asked to stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)