Template:Article Rescue Squadron Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:59, 14 April 2021 editಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users94,900 editsm Fixed the obsolete html tag Lint error.← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:58, 31 January 2022 edit undoAlalch E. (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers30,326 edits Fix alignment issueNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div style="float:right">		<div style="float:right">
	{\|cellpadding=4 style="border: 1px solid #0E0F10; background-color: #EAECF1" align=right width=375px		{\|cellpadding=4 style="border: 1px solid #0E0F10; background-color: #EAECF1" align=right width=375px
		⚫	\|{{center\|'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''}}
	\|style="text-align:center;"\|
⚫	'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''
	]		]
	* Please note that '''WikiProject ]''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking. Please be sure to follow ]. This means, in part, that you should use ] on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.		* Please note that '''WikiProject ]''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking. Please be sure to follow ]. This means, in part, that you should use ] on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.

Revision as of 22:58, 31 January 2022

Project Code of conduct

Please note that WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron is a Wikiproject intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting !votes, nor about vote-stacking. Please be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.
Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Misplaced Pages's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.