Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sydney: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:13, 10 June 2003 editRobert Merkel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,324 edits yanked crime section← Previous edit Revision as of 07:35, 10 June 2003 edit undoArno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,792 edits reverseNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


:I've bitten the bullet and yanked it and whacked a great big disclaimer on top. If somebody wants to fix it, well and good, otherwise it can stay well out of the way. --] 04:13 10 Jun 2003 (UTC) :I've bitten the bullet and yanked it and whacked a great big disclaimer on top. If somebody wants to fix it, well and good, otherwise it can stay well out of the way. --] 04:13 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)

:: That'sinteresting - it was part of a seprate article in the first place! ( See history of this page) ] 07:35 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:35, 10 June 2003

If the Melbourne entry is going to mention that city's distance from Sydney . . . Oh, and you might mention the city's namesake.


As an inhabitant of Sydney, I honestly can't see why its subway is considered interesting - some details please, or else excise the reference -- MB

Probably just a remnant of the Underground nomenclature wars :-) --Anders Törlind

Manning: You don't find Sydney's subway system interesting? You've obviously never gone on a tour of the disused tunnels off St. James station :) -- Simon J Kissane


Again, some discussion of Sin City's criminal past is worthwhile, but the article as it stands gives the misleading impression that the crime rate is extremely high in world terms, which is just not true. Not even Alan Jones can make it so.---Robert Merkel 07:31 Dec 5, 2002 (UTC)

I agree - the crime section seems very out of place - wm

I've bitten the bullet and yanked it and whacked a great big disclaimer on top. If somebody wants to fix it, well and good, otherwise it can stay well out of the way. --Robert Merkel 04:13 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)
That'sinteresting - it was part of a seprate article in the first place! ( See history of this page) Arno 07:35 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)