| Revision as of 17:05, 21 April 2021 editErmenrich (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers22,388 edits →Bludgeoning: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:07, 21 April 2021 edit undoBilto74811 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users671 edits →BludgeoningTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| You might want to read ] before you continue posting so much in the RFC you’ve started. Just some friendly advice.—] (]) 17:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC) | You might want to read ] before you continue posting so much in the RFC you’ve started. Just some friendly advice.—] (]) 17:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks but I dont see any issue in commenting my view and thanking each commentor for their comment and vote since Im the one that asked for their view. ] (]) 17:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:07, 21 April 2021
I apologize for changing the page without discussing it. I simply wanted to state that the majority of scholars (Baruch Halpern, Avraham Faust, Carol Meyers, Richard Elliott Friedman, William G. Dever and others) do believe that an historical core exists in the Book of Exodus and that some settlers did come from Egypt, although the Biblical story is obviously non historical, and is not to be read as historical. -Karma1998 (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Bludgeoning
You might want to read wp:BLUDGEONING before you continue posting so much in the RFC you’ve started. Just some friendly advice.—Ermenrich (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks but I dont see any issue in commenting my view and thanking each commentor for their comment and vote since Im the one that asked for their view. Bilto74811 (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)