Misplaced Pages

Talk:Swiftfox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:39, 20 January 2007 editKilz (talk | contribs)1,368 edits add firefox speed discussion area.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:39, 20 January 2007 edit undoHagermanBot (talk | contribs)95,722 editsm Kilz didn't sign: "add firefox speed discussion area."Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
==Firefox Speed== ==Firefox Speed==
The Firefox speed section uses references to very old benchmarks on old equipment. The uses Firefox and Swiftfox 1.5. The Softpedia page was made on 30th of November 2005. The are based on Firefox 1.0 and Firefox 1.5 and 2.0 beta versions. The site is also a private site listing the findings of only one person with no editorial oversight and is therefore not a creditable source per its . magazine is also based on Firefox 1.5.0.6 a very old build.If we cant find information on the 2.0 version from a reliable source the section needs to be removed IMHO. The Firefox speed section uses references to very old benchmarks on old equipment. The uses Firefox and Swiftfox 1.5. The Softpedia page was made on 30th of November 2005. The are based on Firefox 1.0 and Firefox 1.5 and 2.0 beta versions. The site is also a private site listing the findings of only one person with no editorial oversight and is therefore not a creditable source per its . magazine is also based on Firefox 1.5.0.6 a very old build.If we cant find information on the 2.0 version from a reliable source the section needs to be removed IMHO.
Secondly we do not need Firefox benchmarks on the Swiftfox page. Comparing the speed of Firefox vs Swiftfox is something that needs to be done on a article we link to. Doing this here is original research . This page is also about Swiftfox, not the short comings of Firefox IMHO. Secondly we do not need Firefox benchmarks on the Swiftfox page. Comparing the speed of Firefox vs Swiftfox is something that needs to be done on a article we link to. Doing this here is original research . This page is also about Swiftfox, not the short comings of Firefox IMHO. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 19:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

Revision as of 19:39, 20 January 2007

Archive

Archives


1
WikiProject iconLinux Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

I've just archived the talk page, as it was 182KB - much over the recommended maximum of 32KB. 0L1 Talk Contribs 23:49 15/12/2006 (UTC)

Firefox Speed

The Firefox speed section uses references to very old benchmarks on old equipment. The Softpedia uses Firefox and Swiftfox 1.5. The Softpedia page was made on 30th of November 2005. The Browser Speed Tests are based on Firefox 1.0 and Firefox 1.5 and 2.0 beta versions. The site is also a private site listing the findings of only one person with no editorial oversight and is therefore not a creditable source per its . APC magazine is also based on Firefox 1.5.0.6 a very old build.If we cant find information on the 2.0 version from a reliable source the section needs to be removed IMHO. Secondly we do not need Firefox benchmarks on the Swiftfox page. Comparing the speed of Firefox vs Swiftfox is something that needs to be done on a article we link to. Doing this here is original research . This page is also about Swiftfox, not the short comings of Firefox IMHO. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kilz (talkcontribs) 19:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC).

Categories: