| Revision as of 19:23, 23 January 2007 editClean Copy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,190 edits why would we not need these? everything (controversial) requires verification here← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:24, 23 January 2007 edit undoClean Copy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,190 edits criticism section existsNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | ||
| *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
| *Add a Waldorf criticism section. | *Add a Waldorf criticism section.(? There is one already...so what is being asked here ?) | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 23 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
- Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?
Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
- New question is do we
haveneedhave sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching?
- New question is do we
- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
Add section about the temperaments.- Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?
- Add a Waldorf criticism section.(? There is one already...so what is being asked here ?)