| Revision as of 04:11, 28 January 2007 editLovelight (talk | contribs)1,461 edits Undo revision 103761051 by Arthur Rubin (talk) What you see, is not what you get…← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:37, 28 January 2007 edit undoDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits They are conspiracy theories.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
| ==9/11 |
==9/11 conspiracy theories== | ||
| <noinclude>The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease. | <noinclude>The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| <div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
| {| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" | {| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" | ||
| | align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki><nowiki>]</nowiki></div>'''9/11 |
| align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki><nowiki>]</nowiki></div>''']<br>Conspiracy theories, hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | align="center" halign="top" | Theories | | align="center" halign="top" | Theories | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | ] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | align="center" halign="top" | Proponents and supporters | | align="center" halign="top" | Proponents and supporters | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| | align="center" halign="top" | Visual media | | align="center" halign="top" | Visual media | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist. | This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist. | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| </noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 04:37, 28 January 2007
9/11 conspiracy theories
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.
| 9/11 conspiracy theories Conspiracy theories, hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture | |
| Theories | |
| Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center | NESARA conspiracy theory | |
| Proponents and supporters | |
| Kevin Barrett | Robert M. Bowman | Andreas von Bülow | James H. Fetzer | David Ray Griffin | Sander Hicks | Jim Hoffman | Alex Jones | Steven E. Jones | Thierry Meyssan | Michael Ruppert | Peter Dale Scott | Webster G. Tarpley | Barrie Zwicker | |
| Groups | |
| 9/11 Citizens Watch | Scholars for 9/11 Truth | |
| Visual media | |
| Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11 | Fahrenheit 9/11 | 9/11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands | 911: In Plane Site | Loose Change | 9/11: Press for Truth | |
| Books | |
| 9/11: The Big Lie | The CIA and September 11 | The New Pearl Harbor | The Terror Timeline | The War on Freedom | |
This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.