| Revision as of 15:17, 23 August 2021 editGoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers494,858 edits →InformationTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:35, 23 August 2021 edit undoJBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators195,998 edits This comment serves no constructive purpose, and in the cnrext of what has passed before is not a good idea.Tag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ===Information=== | ===Information=== | ||
| Additionally, one is not allowed to remove declined unblock requests white the block is in force. ]] 14:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC) | Additionally, one is not allowed to remove declined unblock requests white the block is in force. ]] 14:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :I hope he's gotten a new pair of pants. ] (]) 15:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:35, 23 August 2021
This user has permanently retired themselves.
Unblock request
KosomPolskii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Firstly, I am not a sock. I created this account way before the dispute with GoodDay. I was getting logged out continuously on my iPad, so some edits were with IP and some with username. Secondly, the ban on my IP was for adding sections to GoodDay’s talk page, warning him of escalation if he did not withdraw his uncivil comments here https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:George_V#Monarch_of_the_United_Kingdom where they said “this will shock the pants off of you” and repeated such behaviour here https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:DrKay#Notice . Me creating sections on their talk page was to be reconcile and rapprochement. They, however, complain about me. Also, my recent edits here https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_titles_and_honours_of_George_VI&oldid=1040246161 are backed by solid sources and are verifiable. Misplaced Pages policy on block evasion says a user editing on behalf of a blocked dude, if his edits are verifiable and constructive, are not to be treated as acting in bad faith. Please consider these facts. I would like to know what was the source of this dispute, me editing constructively, or GoodDay being uncivil and un-repentant. Am I allowed to escalate these uncivil comments from GoodDay. I simply don’t have time to be disruptive or to be blocked. KosomPolskii (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block on the IP was your block. You shouldn't have edited anywhere except your user talk, and that only to seek unblock. I applaud HighInBC's altering of your block as I share their hopes for your future here. However, you will need to understand that when admins or experienced editors give you advice your first action is to listen. Sure, they could be wrong but it's in your best interest to ask questions, read policies and guidelines and attempt to understand the origin of the advice. Tiderolls 13:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Information
Additionally, one is not allowed to remove declined unblock requests white the block is in force. Tiderolls 14:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)