| Revision as of 02:36, 2 February 2007 editKarebh (talk | contribs)69 edits ←Created page with ' This subject is a fairly large one among biologists who study species, and it was really not represented in the species article. It is also one that lots of...' | Revision as of 02:39, 2 February 2007 edit undoTainter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,010 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This subject is a fairly large one among biologists who study species, and it was really not represented in the ] article. It is also one that lots of non-biologists wonder about sometimes, so it seemed like a gap that should be filled. ] 02:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | This subject is a fairly large one among biologists who study species, and it was really not represented in the ] article. It is also one that lots of non-biologists wonder about sometimes, so it seemed like a gap that should be filled. ] 02:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| I would ask, so this page doesn't get pro'd, to difinity clean it up, expand it, and reference it to and through the ] article. there is no reason that the subsection related to this subject in that article cannot be improved as well. --] 02:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:39, 2 February 2007
This subject is a fairly large one among biologists who study species, and it was really not represented in the species article. It is also one that lots of non-biologists wonder about sometimes, so it seemed like a gap that should be filled. Karebh 02:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I would ask, so this page doesn't get pro'd, to difinity clean it up, expand it, and reference it to and through the species article. there is no reason that the subsection related to this subject in that article cannot be improved as well. --Tainter 02:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)