Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chicdat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:44, 10 November 2021 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Chicdat/Archive 6) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 22:28, 14 November 2021 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,558 edits →Topic ban: new sectionNext edit →
Line 100: Line 100:


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice-->] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added 11:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice-->] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added 11:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Topic ban ==

Per consensus at the administrator's noticeboard (), the following topic ban has been enacted:

:''Chicdat is topic-banned from editing pages within projectspace ("Misplaced Pages:"). He is still able to edit the talkpages of these pages to make any requests and engage in discussions. Chicdat is additionally prohibited from editing redirects to pages in the project space, for the same period. These restrictions are appealable at ] no sooner than 6 months."

Please read ], ] and ].

This topic ban will be logged at ].

Regards<br>] (]) 22:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:28, 14 November 2021

This is Chicdat's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 14 days 

The problem with Misplaced Pages is not the vandals, it is the experienced, respected, wrongdoers. Chicdat


Voluntary restriction

I formally agree to a voluntary restriction. I will treat this like an involuntary editing restriction, and administrators may treat this the same way. The details are:

  • I can edit freely in certain areas. They include
    • Everything in mainspace and talkspace
    • Everything in WikiProject Tropical cyclones
    • Everything in XfD
    • All areas of the village pump
    • Using my pending changes reviewer user right
  • I may not:
    • Involve myself with blocks or unblocks, except my own
    • Interact with Kashmorwiki until he/she is unblocked
    • Edit in any way an admin noticeboard, except in discussions concerning me and to appeal this ban
    • Close any discussion, except to withdraw if I started it (per ANI discussion)
    • Edit any other noticeboard (see below)
    • Edit WP:SPI
    • Retarget project-space redirects without a discussion at RFD
  • I may, but only under scrutiny in exceptional circumstances, edit:
    • AIV (e.g. a vandal destroying large numbers of pages)
    • UAA (e.g. an extraordinarily disruptive username, like "XXXX should be dead")
    • RFPP (e.g. a page being vandalized 30 times in 10 minutes)
    • An extremely controversial article
    • Templates (only after discussion and testing in the sandbox)

If I violate these conditions once, I will be given a final/only warning. Twice, and please block me. 🐔 Chicdat 10:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Another thing

I take full responsibility of any article created by Kashmorwiki. 🐔 Chicdat 10:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

? ? ? ? CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Chicdat means that he doesn't want any of them to be speedy deleted under G5 I believe. Jackattack1597 (talk) 23:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
As your mentor I'll watch over you in regards to your restrictions. To admins: I don't think Chicdat should not be indefinitely blocked in all areas of Misplaced Pages when he's violating these conditions multiple times. I'll prefer a temporary partial block (on Misplaced Pages: space in particular), but if these things build up, eventual indefinite partial block. (Reason why I said this is because this is how topic bans normally work) BTW, here's your adopt page to continue your lessons, and please read policies and guidelines to help answering these questions. MarioJump83! 07:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


  • Apparently what you are doing here is WP:HOUNDING which is a form of harassment against a user, by checking his contributions and spuriously taking responsibility of the articles that cannot be checked at least not under a minute the way you are doing.

WP:PROXYING says: "Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned or blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits. "

Where are your independent reasons other than to "I want to preserve creations of Kashmorwiki"? That's not a valid reason but violation of WP:PROXYING.

Since a number of users have already raised concern over your spurious attempts to take responsibility, I am going to give you an opportunity to self-revert yourself on these all articles that weren't edited by you before they were tagged for deletion. Failing this, I will need to report you to WP:AN. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Since you didn't get active during May 7 I have reverted your edits, please see Special:Diff/1021727380 and Special:Diff/1021727467 for the reason. MarioJump83! 03:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
I just realized this violates the "Kashmorwiki interaction" part of my ban. Thank you for realizing first, and sorry that I couldn't be active during May 7. 🐔 Chicdat   10:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Modification

I expand this ban to closing any discussion, except when withdrawing a discussion that I nominated, that had significant opposition. 🐔 Chicdat   09:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I have clarified that I can edit in any area relating to my pending changes reviewer rights. 🐔 Chicdat   10:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Stop your disruptive editing (in your own words "just blindly reverting"). If it happens again, I will take it to the admins noticeboard. Renewal6 (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

My editing is not disruptive in the slightest. I'm just following WP:BRD. If you want me to stop reverting, take it to a place where regular longevity editors will determine whether there is consensus for this change or not. In the meantime, I'll revert your edit at list of the oldest people by country. 🐔 Chicdat   10:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
(talk page watcher), Chicdat and Renewal6: You are both edit warring on multiple pages simultaneously: . This is my only warning; please take this dispute to the relevant talk page(s) – if you continue reverting, you may be sanctioned. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in longevity. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Blablubbs (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA Reform 2021 Phase 2 has begun

Following a 2 week brainstorming period and a 1 week proposal period, the 30 day discussion of changes to our Request for Adminship process has begun. Following feedback on Phase 1, in order to ensure that the largest number of people possible can see all proposals, new proposals will only be accepted for the for the first 7 days of Phase 2. The 30 day discussion is scheduled to last until November 30. Please join the discussion or even submit your own proposal.

There is 1 future mailing planned with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Saturnino de la Fuente García

In my opinion, he needs to be nominated for AFD. If you get time and you agree, maybe you could work your usual magic! Regards, MattSucci (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Of course, of course. 🐔 Chicdat   12:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.163.1.15.238 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Topic ban

Per consensus at the administrator's noticeboard (permanent link), the following topic ban has been enacted:

Chicdat is topic-banned from editing pages within projectspace ("Misplaced Pages:"). He is still able to edit the talkpages of these pages to make any requests and engage in discussions. Chicdat is additionally prohibited from editing redirects to pages in the project space, for the same period. These restrictions are appealable at WP:ANI no sooner than 6 months."

Please read Misplaced Pages:Banning policy#Topic ban, Misplaced Pages:Banning policy#Exceptions to limited bans and Misplaced Pages:Banning policy#Evasion and enforcement.

This topic ban will be logged at Misplaced Pages:Editing restrictions.

Regards
Daniel (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)