Misplaced Pages

User talk:Spamreporter1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:34, 6 February 2007 editSpamreporter1 (talk | contribs)215 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 07:54, 6 February 2007 edit undoSpamreporter1 (talk | contribs)215 edits rem archived matNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --] 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --] 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

==Your Username (Spamreporter1)==
<s>Hello ''Spamreporter1'', thank you for your contributions. Misplaced Pages has a ] on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be ] with that policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it ]. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name ] following the guidelines on that page. Thank you. <!-- Template:UsernameDiscussion -->--]<sup>] ]</sup> 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)</s>
:Hello. While there had been some discussion ] about whether your username met Misplaced Pages ] on what usernames editors can use, the consensus was to '''allow''' it, and that discussion has now been closed. ''You do '''not''' need to change your username.'' Thank you. --]<sup>] ]</sup> 23:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:54, 6 February 2007

Archives

Links to commercial sites

(From User_talk:Bill Clark)

You will find a primary guideline to review at Misplaced Pages:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. Spamreporter1 12:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think I've violated that guideline, so I'm not sure what the problem is. I only added external links in a few cases (and not in the example cited here), and those were to community websites (not commercial) for those cities. In most of the cases, I simply added a wikilink in the "Economy/Public utilities" section indicating that Northland was the cable provider for that city, and/or a reference/citation for that fact.
Since my intention was to do the same for a large number of other cable companies, I'd like to get this cleared up before I proceed further. Is the problem with the wikilinks in the "Economy/Public utilities" section, the few external links, the citations, or something else? I'll be happy to change my plans, but need to have a clear idea of what's expected. Is there a better (more inclusive) place to discuss this, where I might get more input?
Thanks, --Bill Clark 14:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

NOTE: Please see the main discussion at VP/A and post any follow-ups there. --Bill Clark 19:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

RE:WikiProject bot pop

No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 1:33pm, February 4, 2007

I have responded here, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 2:01pm, February 4, 2007

Public Utility links

I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --Bill Clark 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)