| Revision as of 15:38, 7 February 2007 view sourceWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 editsm Reverted edits by 72.20.128.64 (talk) to last version by Red Deathy← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:54, 7 February 2007 view source Xvandelx (talk | contribs)1 editNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| COMMIE MONKEYS ARE TAKING OVER MY MIND! AND YOU HAVE A VAGINA FACE!! | |||
| {{dablink|This article is about '''communism''' as a form of society and as a political movement. For information on Communist organizations, see ]. For information on communist party-run states, see ].}} | |||
| {{Communism}} | |||
| '''Communism''' is an ideology that seeks to establish a ], ] ], based upon ] of the ]. It can be classified as a branch of the broader ]. | |||
| Early forms of ] social organization have been described as ']' by Marxists. However, communism as a political goal is generally a conjectured form of future social organization. There is a considerable variety of views among self-identified communists, including ], ], ], ], ], ], and various currents of ], which are generally the more widespread varieties. However, various offshoots of the ] (what critics call the ']') and Maoist interpretations of ] comprise a particular branch of communism that has the distinction of having been the primary driving force for communism in ] during most of the 20th century. The competing branch of Trotskyism has not had such a distinction. | |||
| ] held that society could not be transformed from the ] ] to the advanced communist mode of production all at once, but required a transitional period which Marx described as the ] ], the first stage of communism. The communist society Marx envisioned emerging from capitalism has never been implemented, and it remains theoretical; Marx, in fact, commented very little on what communist society would actually look like. However, the term 'Communism', especially when it is ], is often used to refer to the political and economic ]s under ] that claimed to embody the dictatorship of the proletariat. | |||
| In the late 19th century, Marxist theories motivated ] across ], although their policies later developed along the lines of "reforming" capitalism, rather than overthrowing it. The exception was the ]. One branch of this party, commonly known as the ]s and headed by ], succeeded in taking control of the country after the toppling of the ] in the ]. In 1918, this party changed its name to the ], thus establishing the contemporary distinction between communism and other trends of socialism. | |||
| After the success of the ] in ], many socialist parties in other countries became communist parties, signaling varying degrees of allegiance to the new Communist Party of the Soviet Union. After ], Communists consolidated power in ], and in 1949, the ] (CPC) led by ] established the ], which would later follow its own unique ideological path of communist development. Among the other countries in the ] that adopted a pro-communist government at some point were ], ], ], ], ], and ]. By the early 1980s almost one-third of the world's population lived in ]. | |||
| Since the early 1970s, the term "]" was used to refer to the policies of communist parties in western Europe, which sought to break with the tradition of uncritical and unconditional support of the Soviet Union. Such parties were politically active and electorally significant in ](]), ](]), and ](]). | |||
| VAGINASAUROUSREX!!!!!!!!! | |||
| There is a history of ] ], which manifested itself in the ] and in the subsequent ], for example, as well as in the later period of ]. However, many regions of ] continue to have strong communist movements of various types. | |||
| With the decline of the Communist governments in Eastern Europe from the late 1980s and the ] on ], ], communism's influence has decreased dramatically in Europe. However, around a quarter of the world's population still lives in Communist states, mostly in the People's Republic of China. | |||
| ==Early communism== | |||
| {{Main|History of communism}} | |||
| Karl Marx saw ] as the original, ] state of humankind from which it arose. For Marx, only after humanity was capable of producing ], did private property develop. | |||
| In the history of Western thought, the idea of a society based on common ownership of property can be traced back to ancient times.<ref>"Communism." ''Encarta Online''. 2006.</ref> In his 4th century BCE '']'', ] considers the idea of the ruling class sharing property. <ref>"Communism" ''Dictionary of the Social Sciences''. Craig Calhoun, ed. Oxford University Press 2002. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press.</ref> In the republic, the ruling or guardian classes are committed to an austere and communistic way of life, with the aim of devoting all of their time and efforts to public service. <ref>Angela Hobbs, "Plato" ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics''. Ed. Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan. Oxford University Press, 2003. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press.</ref> | |||
| At one time or another, various small communist communities existed, generally under the inspiration of ].<ref>"Communism." ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. 2006. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.</ref> In the medieval Christian church, for example, some monastic communities and religious orders shared their land and other property. (''See'' ]) These groups often believed that concern with private property was a distraction from religious service to God and neighbor. (Encarta) | |||
| Communist thought has also been traced back to the work of 16th century English writer ]. In his treatise '']'' (1516), More portrayed a society based on common ownership of property, whose rulers administered it through the application of reason. (Encarta) In the 17th century, communist thought arguably surfaced again in England. In 17th-century England, the ], a ] religious group known as advocated the abolition of private ownership of land. (Encarta) ], in his 1895 ''Cromwell and Communism'' argued that several groupings in the ], especially the Diggers espoused clear communistic, agrarian ideals, and that ]'s attitude to these groups was at best ambivalent and often hostile.<ref>Eduard Bernstein, (1895). ''Kommunistische und demokratisch-sozialistische Strömungen während der englischen Revolution'', J.H.W. Dietz, Stuttgart. {{OCLC|36367345}} Sources available at </ref> | |||
| CALL US FOR MORE INFO 412-884-5230 | |||
| Criticism of the idea of private property continued into the ] of the 18th century, through such thinkers as ] in France. (Encarta) Later, following the upheaval of the French Revolution, communism emerged as a political doctrine.<ref> "Communism" ''A Dictionary of Sociology''. John Scott and Gordon Marshall. Oxford University Press 2005. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press.</ref> ], in particular, espoused the goals of common ownership of land and total economic and political equality among citizens. (Encarta) | |||
| Various social reformers in the early 19th century founded communities based on common ownership. But unlike many previous communist communities, they replaced the religious emphasis with a rational and philanthropic basis. (EB) Notable among them were ], who founded ] in Indiana (1825), and ], whose followers organized other settlements in the United States such as ] (1841–47). (EB) Later in the 19th century, Karl Marx described these social reformers as "]" to contrast them with his program of "]" (a term coined by ]). Other writers described by Marx as "utopian socialists" included ] and ]. | |||
| In its modern form, communism grew out of the socialist movement of 19th-century Europe. (Encarta) As the ] advanced, socialist critics blamed capitalism for the misery of the ]—a new class of poor, urban factory workers who labored under often-hazardous conditions. (EB) Foremost among these critics were the German philosopher Karl Marx and his associate Friedrich Engels. (EB) In 1848 Marx and Engels offered a new definition of communism and popularized the term in their famous pamphlet '']''. (EB) Engels, who lived in ], observed the organization of the ] movement (''see'' ]), while Marx departed from his university comrades to meet the proletariat in France and Germany. | |||
| ==The emergence of modern communism== | |||
| {{main|Marxism}} | |||
| ===Marxism=== | |||
| ] | |||
| Like other socialists, Marx and Engels sought an end to capitalism and the systems which they perceived to be responsible for the exploitation of workers. But whereas earlier socialists often favored longer-term social reform, Marx and Engels believed that popular revolution was all but inevitable, and the only path to socialism. | |||
| According to the Marxist argument for communism, the main characteristic of human life in class society is ]; and communism is desirable because it entails the full realization of human freedom.<ref>Stephen Whitefield. "Communism." ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics''. Ed. Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan. Oxford University Press, 2003.</ref> Marx here follows ] in conceiving freedom not merely as an absence of restraints but as action with content. (McLean and McMillan, 2003) They believed that communism allowed people to do what they want but also put humans in such conditions and such relations with one another that they would not wish to exploit, or have any need to. Whereas for Hegel the unfolding of this ethical life in history is mainly driven by the realm of ideas, for Marx, communism emerged from material forces, particularly the development of the ]. (McLean and McMillan, 2003) | |||
| Marxism holds that a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle will result in victory for the ] and the establishment of a communist society in which private ownership is abolished over time and the means of production and subsistence belong to the community. Marx himself wrote little about life under communism, giving only the most general indication as to what constituted a communist society. It is clear that it entails abundance in which there is little limit to the projects that humans may undertake. In the popular slogan that was adopted by the communist movement, communism was a world in which each gave according to their abilities, and received according to their needs.' '']'' (1845) was one of Marx's few writings to elaborate on the communist future: | |||
| DDDDAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNN RRRRRAAAAAAAATTTTTTHHHHHHHHEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |||
| :<blockquote>"In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic."<ref>Karl Marx, (1845). '']'', Marx-Engels Institute, Moscow. ISBN 978-1-57392-258-6. Sources available at </ref> | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| Marx's lasting vision was to add this vision to a positive scientific theory of how society was moving in a law-governed way toward communism, and, with some tension, a political theory that explained why revolutionary activity was required to bring it about. (McLean and McMillan, 2003) | |||
| In the late 19th century the terms "socialism" and "communism" were often used interchangeably. (Encarta) However, Marx and Engels argued that communism would not emerge from capitalism in a fully developed state, but would pass through a "first phase" in which most productive property was owned in common, but with some class differences remaining. The "first phase" would eventually give way to a "higher phase" in which class differences were eliminated, and a state was no longer needed. Lenin frequently used the term "socialism" to refer to Marx and Engels' supposed "first phase" of communism and used the term "communism" interchangeably with Marx and Engels' "higher phase" of communism. | |||
| These later aspects, particularly as developed by Lenin, provided the underpinning for the mobilizing features of 20th century Communist parties. Later writers such as ] and ] modified Marx's vision by allotting a central place to the state in the development of such societies, by arguing for a prolonged transition period of socialism prior to the attainment of full communism. | |||
| ===Other currents=== | |||
| Some of Marx's contemporaries espoused similar ideas, but differed in their views of how to reach to a classless society. Following the split between those associated with Marx and ] at the ], the anarchists formed the ].<ref>Marshall, Peter. "Demanding the Impossible - A History of Anarchism" p. 9. Fontana Press, London, 1993 ISBN 978-0-00-686245-1</ref> Anarchists argued that capitalism and the state were inseparable and that one could not be abolished without the other. ] such as ] theorized an immediate transition to one society with no classes. ] became one of the dominant forms of anarchist organization, arguing that labor unions, as opposed to Communist parties, are the organizations that can change society. Consequently, many anarchists have been in opposition to Marxist communism to this day. | |||
| WHATS THE FREQUENCY KENNTH!?!??#!@?#$!@?$! | |||
| In the late 19th century Russian Marxism developed a distinct character. The first major figure of Russian Marxism was ]. Underlying the work of Plekhanov was the assumption that Russia, less urbanized and industrialized than Western Europe, had many years to go before society would be ready for proletarian revolution could occur, and a transitional period of a bourgeois democratic regime would be required to replace ]ism with a socialist and later communist society. (EB) | |||
| WHATS THE FREQUENCY? | |||
| ==The growth of modern communism== | |||
| KENNTH!!!!!!!!! | |||
| {{main|Marxism-Leninism}} | |||
| ] following his return to Petrograd]] | |||
| In Russia, the 1917 October Revolution was the first time any party with an avowedly Marxist orientation, in this case the ], seized state power. The assumption of state power by the Bolsheviks generated a great deal of practical and theoretical debate within the Marxist movement. Marx believed that socialism and communism would be built upon foundations laid by the most advanced capitalist development. Russia, however, was one of the poorest countries in Europe with an enormous, largely illiterate ] and a minority of industrial workers. It should be noted, however, that Marx had explicitly stated that Russia might be able to skip the stage of bourgeois capitalism. <ref>Marc Edelman, "Late Marx and the Russian road: Marx and the 'Peripheries of Capitalism'" - book reviews. ''Monthly Review'', Dec., 1984. </ref> Other socialists also believed that a Russian revolution could be the precursor of workers' revolutions in the West. | |||
| The moderate socialist ]s opposed Lenin's communist Bolsheviks' plan for socialist revolution before capitalism was more fully developed. The Bolsheviks successful rise to power was based upon the slogans "peace, bread, and land" and "All power to the Soviets," slogans which tapped the massive public desire for an end to Russian involvement in the ], the peasants' demand for ], and popular support for the ]. | |||
| The usage of the terms "communism" and "socialism" shifted after 1917, when the Bolsheviks changed their name to the Communist Party and installed a ] devoted to the implementation of socialist policies under ]. The ] had dissolved in 1916 over national divisions, as the separate national parties that composed it did not maintain a unified front against the ], instead generally supporting their respective nation's role. Lenin thus created the ] (Comintern) in 1919 and sent the ], which included ], to all European socialist parties willing to adhere. In France, for example, the majority of the ] socialist party split in 1921 to form the ] (French Section of the Communist International). Henceforth, the term "Communism" was applied to the objective of the parties founded under the umbrella of the Comintern. Their program called for the uniting of workers of the world for revolution, which would be followed by the establishment of a ] as well as the development of a socialist economy. Ultimately, if their program held, there would develop a harmonious classless society, with the withering away of the state. | |||
| During the ] (1918-1922), the Bolsheviks ] all productive property and imposed a policy of "]," which put factories and railroads under strict government control, collected and rationed food, and introduced some bourgeois management of industry. After three years of war and the 1921 ], Lenin declared the ] (NEP) in 1921, which was to give a "limited place for a limited time to capitalism." The NEP lasted until 1928, when ]'s personal fight for leadership, and the introduction of the first Five Year Plan spelled the end of it. Following the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks formed in 1922 the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), or ], from the former ]. | |||
| Following Lenin's democratic centralism, the Communist parties were organized on a hierarchical basis, with active cells of members as the broad base; they were made up only of elite ]s approved by higher members of the party as being reliable and completely subject to ].<ref>]. "Communism" ''The Oxford Companion to World War II''. Ed. I. C. B. Dear and M. R. D. Foot. Oxford University Press, 2001.</ref> | |||
| *EVIL LAUGH* | |||
| The Soviet Union and other countries ruled by Communist Parties are often described as ']s' with ']' economic bases. (Scott and Marshall, 2005) This usage indicates that they proclaim that they have realized part of the socialist program by abolishing the private control of the means of production and establishing state control over the economy; however, they do not declare themselves truly communist, as they have not established communal ownership of property. | |||
| ====Stalinism==== | |||
| {{main|Stalinism}} | |||
| The Stalinist version of socialism, with some important modifications, shaped the Soviet Union and influenced Communist Parties worldwide. It was heralded as a possibility of building communism via a massive program of ] and ]. The rapid development of industry, and above all the victory of the Soviet Union in the Second World War, maintained that vision throughout the world, even around a decade following Stalin's death, when the party adopted a program in which it promised the establishment of communism within thirty years. | |||
| However, under Stalin's leadership, evidence emerged that dented faith in the possibility of achieving communism within the framework of the Soviet model. Stalin had created in the Soviet Union a repressive state that dominated every aspect of life. Later, growth declined, and ] and ] by state officials increased, which dented the legitimacy of the Soviet system. | |||
| Despite the activity of the ], the Soviet Communist Party adopted the ] theory of "]" and claimed that, due to the "]," it was possible, even necessary, to build socialism in one country alone. This departure from Marxist internationalism was challenged by ], whose theory of "]" stressed the necessity of world revolution. | |||
| MIKE PARISH <3 DAN RATHER | |||
| ====Trotskyism==== | |||
| {{main|Trotskyism}} | |||
| Trotsky and his supporters organized into the "]," and their platform became known as ]. But Stalin eventually succeeded in gaining full control of the Soviet regime, and their attempts to remove Stalin from power resulted in Trotsky's exile from the Soviet Union in 1929. After Trotsky's exile, world communism fractured into two distinct branches: ] and ]. Trotsky later founded the ], a Trotskyist rival to the Comintern, in 1938. | |||
| Trotskyist ideas have continually found a modest echo among political movements in ] and ], especially in ], ], ], ], and ]. Many Trotskyist organizations are also active in more stable, developed countries in ] and ]. | |||
| However, as a whole, Trotsky's theories and attitudes were never reaccepted in worldwide mainstream Communist circles after Trotsky's expulsion, either within or outside of the ]. This remained the case even after the ] and subsequent events exposed the fallibility of ] and ]. Today, even given the fact that there are areas of the world where Trotskyist movements are rather large, Trotskyist movements have never coalesced in a mass movement that has seized state power. | |||
| ===Maoism=== | |||
| {{main|Maoism}} | |||
| After the death of Stalin in 1953, the Soviet Union's new leader, ], denounced Stalin's crimes and his ]. He called for a return to the principles of Lenin, thus presaging some change in Communist methods. However, Khrushchev's reforms heightened ideological differences between the ] and the Soviet Union, which became increasingly apparent in the 1960s. As the ] in the international Communist movement turned toward open hostility, China portrayed itself as a leader of the underdeveloped world against the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union. | |||
| hascenekidds@gmail.com | |||
| Parties and groups that supported the ] (CPC) in their criticism against the new Soviet leadership proclaimed themselves as 'anti-revisionist' and denounced the CPSU and the parties aligned with it as ] "capitalist-roaders." The Sino-Soviet Split resulted in divisions amongst communist parties around the world. Notably, the ] sided with the People's Republic of China. Effectively, the CPC under Mao's leadership became the rallying forces of a parallel international Communist tendency. The ideology of CPC, ] (generally referred to as 'Maoism'), was adopted by many of these groups. | |||
| mongoosedogg@gmail.com | |||
| After the death of Mao and the takeover of ], the international Maoist movement fell in disarray. One sector accepted the new leadership in China, a second renounced the new leadership and reaffirmed their commitment to Mao's legacy, and a third renounced Maoism altogether and aligned with the ]. | |||
| ===Other anti-revisionist currents=== | |||
| After the ideological row between the Communist Party of China and the Party of Labour of Albania in 1978, the Albanians rallied a new separate international tendency. This tendency would demarcate itself by a strict defense of the legacy of Joseph Stalin and fierce criticism of virtually all other Communist groupings. The Albanians were able to win over a large share of the Maoists in ], most notably the ]. This tendency has occasionally been labeled as 'Hoxhaism' after the Albanian Communist leader ]. | |||
| After the fall of the Communist government in Albania, the pro-Albanian parties are grouped around an ] and the publication 'Unity and Struggle'. Another important institution for them is the biannual ], which was initiated in 1970s. | |||
| Under the leadership of ], general secretary of the ] a small current emerged in the 1970s of Marxist-Leninist groups in several countries. This tendency aligned with Albania politically, but remained somewhat separate from the main pro-Albanian camp. | |||
| ==Cold War years== | |||
| By virtue of the Soviet Union's victory in the ] in 1945, the ] had occupied nations in both ] and ]; as a result, communism as a movement spread to many new countries. This expansion of communism both in Europe and Asia gave rise to a few different branches of its own, such as ]. | |||
| Communism had been vastly strengthened by the winning of many new nations into the sphere of Soviet influence and strength in Eastern Europe. Governments modeled on Soviet Communism took power with Soviet assistance in ], ], ], ], ] and ]. A Communist government was also created under ] in ], but Tito's independent policies led to the expulsion of ] from the ], which had replaced the ]. ], a new branch in the world communist movement, was labeled "]." ] also became an independent Communist nation after World War II. | |||
| By 1950 the ] held all of ], thus controlling the most populous nation in the world. Other areas where rising Communist strength provoked dissension and in some cases led to actual fighting include the ], ], many nations of the ] and ], and, especially, ] (''see'' ]). With varying degrees of success, Communists attempted to unite with ] and ] forces against what they saw as ] ] in these poor countries. | |||
| ==Communism after the collapse of the Soviet Union== | |||
| In 1985, ] became leader of the Soviet Union and relaxed central control, in accordance with reform policies of ] (openness) and ] (restructuring). The Soviet Union did not intervene as ], ], ], ], ], and ] all abandoned Communist rule by 1990. In 1991, the Soviet Union itself dissolved. | |||
| By the beginning of the 21st century, states controlled by Communist parties under a single-party system include the ], ], ], ], and ]. President ] of ] is a member of the ], but the country is not run under single-party rule. Communist parties, or their descendant parties, remain politically important in many European and Asian countries. | |||
| The People's Republic of China has reassessed many aspects of the Maoist legacy; and the People's Republic of China, Laos, Vietnam, and, to a lesser degree, Cuba have reduced state control of the economy in order to stimulate growth. The People's Republic of China runs ]s dedicated to market-oriented enterprise, free from central government control. Several other communist states have also attempted to implement market-based reforms, including Vietnam. Officially, the leadership of the People's Republic of China refers to its policies as "]." | |||
| Theories within Marxism as to why communism in Eastern Europe was not achieved after socialist revolutions pointed to such elements as the pressure of external capitalist states, the relative backwardness of the societies in which the revolutions occurred, and the emergence of a bureaucratic stratum or class that arrested or diverted the transition press in its own interests. (Scott and Marshall, 2005) Marxist critics of the Soviet Union, most notably Trotsky, referred to the Soviet system, along with other Communist states, as "]" or "]s," arguing that the Soviet system fell far short of Marx's communist ideal. | |||
| Trotskyists argued that the Soviet state was degenerated because the ] was politically dispossessed. The ruling stratum of the Soviet Union was held to be a bureaucratic ], but not a new ruling class, despite their political control. They called for a ] in the USSR and defended the country against ] restoration. Others, like ], advocated the theory of ], which asserts that the bureaucratic elite acted as a surrogate capitalist class in the heavily centralized and repressive political apparatus. | |||
| Non-Marxists, in contrast, have often applied the term to any society ruled by a Communist Party and to any party aspiring to create a society similar to such existing nation-states. In the social sciences, societies ruled by Communist Parties are distinct for their single party control and their socialist economic bases. While ] applied the concept of "]" to these societies, many social scientists identified possibilities for independent political activity within them, and stressed their continued evolution up to the point of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and its allies in Eastern Europe during the late 1980s and early 1990s.<ref>{{cite journal|author=H. Gordon Skilling|date=April 1966|title=Interest Groups and Communist Politics|journal=World Politics|volume=18|issue=3|pages=435-451}}�UNIQ3ab34e171166e61b-HTMLCommentStrip7c7dfbc41ccbeb7000000002</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=]|year=1985|title=Origins of the Great Purges: The Soviet Communist Party Reconsidered: 1933-1938|publisher=Cambridge University Press|id=ISBN 978-0-521-33570-6}}</ref> | |||
| Today, Marxist revolutionaries are conducting armed insurgencies in ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
| ==Criticism of communism== | |||
| :''Main article: ].'' | |||
| A diverse array of writers and political activists have published criticism of communism, such as Soviet bloc dissidents ], ] and ]; social theorists ], ], ], ], and ]; economists ], ], and ]; historians and social scientists ], ], ], and ]; anti-communist leftists ], ], ], ], ], and ]; novelist and philosopher ]; and philosophers ] and ]. Some writers such as Courtois go beyond attributing the estimated tens of millions of deaths and other large-scale human rights abuses during the 20th century merely to the Communist regimes associated with these atrocities;<ref>], ], ], ], ], ], '']'', ], 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, ISBN 978-0-674-07608-2</ref> rather, these authors present the events occurring in these countries, particularly under Stalin and Mao, as an argument against Marxism itself. Some of the critics were former Marxists, such as Wittfogel, who applied Marx's concept of "]" to communist societies such as the ], and Silone, Wright, Koestler (among other writers) who contributed essays to the book '']'' (the title refers not to the Christian God but Marxism itself). | |||
| There have also been more direct ], such as criticisms of the ] or ]. Nevertheless, Communist parties outside of the ], such as the Communist parties in Western Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa, differed greatly. Thus a criticism that is applicable to one such party is not necessarily applicable to another. | |||
| ==Comparing "Communism" to "communism"== | |||
| According to the 1996 third edition of '']'', ''communism'' and derived words are written with the ] ''c'' except when they refer to a political party of that name, a member of that party, or a government led by such a party, in which case the word is written "Communist" (with an ] ''C''). Thus, one may be a communist (an advocate of communism) without being a Communist (a member of a Communist Party or another similar organization). | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| {{Political ideology entry points}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ===Schools of communism=== | |||
| * ] <!-- ] commented out pending dispute --> | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ===Organisations and people=== | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==References== | |||
| <div style="font-size:85%"> | |||
| <references/> | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==Further reading== | |||
| *Forman, James D., "Communism from Marx's Manifesto to 20th-Century Reality", New York, Watts. 1972. ISBN 978-0-531-02571-0 | |||
| *], Furet, Deborah Kan (Translator), "The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century", University of Chicago Press, 2000, ISBN 978-0-226-27341-9 | |||
| *Daniels, Robert Vincent, "A Documentary History of Communism and the World: From Revolution to Collapse", University Press of New England, 1994, ISBN 978-0-87451-678-4 | |||
| *], ], "Communist Manifesto", (Mass Market Paperback - REPRINT), Signet Classics, 1998, ISBN 978-0-451-52710-3 | |||
| *Dirlik, Arif, "Origins of Chinese Communism", Oxford University Press, 1989, ISBN 978-0-19-505454-5 | |||
| *Beer, Max, "The General History of Socialism and Social Struggles Volumes 1 & 2", New York, Russel and Russel, Inc. 1957 | |||
| Adami, Stefano, 'Communism', in Encyclopedia of Italian Literary Studies, ed. Gaetana Marrone - P.Puppa, Routledge, New York- London, 2006 | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| {{Wikiquote|Communism}} | |||
| {{wiktionarypar|communism}} | |||
| * http://www.broadleft.org/ - Comprehensive list of the leftist parties of the world | |||
| * Includes the works of anarchist communists. | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| <!-- The below are interlanguage links. --> | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 16:54, 7 February 2007
COMMIE MONKEYS ARE TAKING OVER MY MIND! AND YOU HAVE A VAGINA FACE!!
VAGINASAUROUSREX!!!!!!!!!
CALL US FOR MORE INFO 412-884-5230
DDDDAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNN RRRRRAAAAAAAATTTTTTHHHHHHHHEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHATS THE FREQUENCY KENNTH!?!??#!@?#$!@?$!
WHATS THE FREQUENCY? KENNTH!!!!!!!!!
- EVIL LAUGH*
MIKE PARISH <3 DAN RATHER
hascenekidds@gmail.com
mongoosedogg@gmail.com