| Revision as of 23:02, 2 January 2022 editExtraordinary Writ (talk | contribs)Administrators75,346 edits →Saeed Lom: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:53, 4 January 2022 edit undoTimetraveller80 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users771 editsNo edit summary | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| *'''Keep''' per above position alone does confer notability.] (]) 10:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per above position alone does confer notability.] (]) 10:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep:''' I wonder why this article was ever nominated? Notable. — ] (]) 18:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC) | *'''Keep:''' I wonder why this article was ever nominated? Notable. — ] (]) 18:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Seems like a notable person as per gng. ] (]) 08:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:53, 4 January 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Saeed Lom
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Saeed Lom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Random police chief, for a while. Fails WP:BIO. Might be WP:BLP1E. Possible UPE campaign Fiddle Faddle 23:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 23:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Are you calling the inspector-general of a whole country a "random" character? Move to Saeed Chawul Lom as the full name is used in every one of the articles. Geschichte (talk) 07:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Position alone confers sufficient notability. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 10:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As noted, the position alone entitles notability. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above position alone does confer notability.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: I wonder why this article was ever nominated? Notable. — Ret.Prof (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like a notable person as per gng. Timetraveller80 (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.