| Revision as of 12:54, 23 February 2022 editDjm-leighpark (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,518 edits →Please be careful on WP:BLPs: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:26, 23 February 2022 edit undoFrazerrex (talk | contribs)434 edits →Please be careful on WP:BLPs: replying to this messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| If you are dealing with BLP it is important to check claims have ] sources, and this was not the case in the content you re-introduced at ]. Ask at the ] for advice if you need it. Thankyou. ] (]) 12:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | If you are dealing with BLP it is important to check claims have ] sources, and this was not the case in the content you re-introduced at ]. Ask at the ] for advice if you need it. Thankyou. ] (]) 12:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| Well from what I can see the previous version was better and the sources were fine, there was definatley no problem with the "documentaries" section, so I've reinstated that. For the other bits I'll look at the sources are see if they prove what the other stuff is true or not or see if it needs changing. | |||
| Frazzerex | |||
Revision as of 13:26, 23 February 2022
Frazerrex, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Frazerrex! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC) |
February 2022
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Please be careful on WP:BLPs
If you are dealing with BLP it is important to check claims have WP:RS sources, and this was not the case in the content you re-introduced at Special:Diff/1073582220. Ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE for advice if you need it. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Well from what I can see the previous version was better and the sources were fine, there was definatley no problem with the "documentaries" section, so I've reinstated that. For the other bits I'll look at the sources are see if they prove what the other stuff is true or not or see if it needs changing.
Frazzerex