| Revision as of 09:20, 16 May 2022 editDouble sharp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,065 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:35, 11 June 2022 edit undoDouble sharp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,065 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | ||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ]]] 15:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC) | <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ]]] 15:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == ] in astrology? == | |||
| Hi DS. Do you know of any astrological sources which use ♁ for planet Earth? I've seen a fair number of astronomical (mostly old), and have seen plenty of 🜨 in both, but don't recall ever seeing ♁ in astrology (not that I'd necessarily notice if I did). ] (]) 04:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Kwamikagami}} I haven't seen this either, sorry. ] (]) 09:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Might be astron only, then. I've asked astrolog. ] (]) 09:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ping|Kwamikagami}} In fairness, I'm going by memory, and I don't think I ever looked very hard for it. But yeah, I don't ''think'' I've seen it. ] (]) 09:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Wondering whether in should be included in our list of astrol symbols (both had been removed), or given the label 'astrol.' on Wikt. ] (]) 16:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Oh, found a recent use of ♇ for Pluto: Boblest, Müller & Wunner (2015) ''Spezielle und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie'', p. 19. Wonder if they inherited it from something one of them wrote earlier, because although they do call Pluto a DP in the caption, it's the only DP they show. (They also have the Moon.) Notice also that, at the top of that page, they use M♁ when giving masses of the planets as multiples of Earth mass, as we might expect from a German source. ] (]) 22:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
| |style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| * On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. | |||
| * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. | |||
| * Interested in taking part? ''']'''! | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.<br> ] to opt out of any future messages. | |||
| (] · ]) ''']''' 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/Mailing_list&oldid=1090143622 --> | |||
| == File:Curium target livermorium.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> –] (]]) 22:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:35, 11 June 2022
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Double sharp. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 |
Proposed deletion of File:Nitrogen electrode potentials.png
The file File:Nitrogen electrode potentials.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned in mainspace. Corresponding vector image is based off of the source of this image, not this image itself, so it is not needed for attribution.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlaster 15:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
"Hecatontagram" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hecatontagram and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#Hecatontagram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Heptagrammic antiprism (7/2) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heptagrammic antiprism (7/2) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Heptagrammic antiprism (7/2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 14:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Heptagrammic antiprism (7/3) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heptagrammic antiprism (7/3) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Heptagrammic antiprism (7/3) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 14:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Heptagrammic crossed-antiprism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heptagrammic crossed-antiprism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Heptagrammic crossed-antiprism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 14:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Dodecagrammic crossed-antiprism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dodecagrammic crossed-antiprism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dodecagrammic crossed-antiprism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 14:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Dodecagrammic antiprism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dodecagrammic antiprism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dodecagrammic antiprism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Dodecagrammic prism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dodecagrammic prism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dodecagrammic prism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 15:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Enneagrammic prism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enneagrammic prism is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Enneagrammic prism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1234qwer1234qwer4 15:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
♁ in astrology?
Hi DS. Do you know of any astrological sources which use ♁ for planet Earth? I've seen a fair number of astronomical (mostly old), and have seen plenty of 🜨 in both, but don't recall ever seeing ♁ in astrology (not that I'd necessarily notice if I did). — kwami (talk) 04:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: I haven't seen this either, sorry. Double sharp (talk) 09:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Might be astron only, then. I've asked astrolog. — kwami (talk) 09:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: In fairness, I'm going by memory, and I don't think I ever looked very hard for it. But yeah, I don't think I've seen it. Double sharp (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wondering whether in should be included in our list of astrol symbols (both had been removed), or given the label 'astrol.' on Wikt. — kwami (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: In fairness, I'm going by memory, and I don't think I ever looked very hard for it. But yeah, I don't think I've seen it. Double sharp (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Might be astron only, then. I've asked astrolog. — kwami (talk) 09:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Oh, found a recent use of ♇ for Pluto: Boblest, Müller & Wunner (2015) Spezielle und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, p. 19. Wonder if they inherited it from something one of them wrote earlier, because although they do call Pluto a DP in the caption, it's the only DP they show. (They also have the Moon.) Notice also that, at the top of that page, they use M♁ when giving masses of the planets as multiples of Earth mass, as we might expect from a German source. — kwami (talk) 22:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
File:Curium target livermorium.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Curium target livermorium.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
