| Revision as of 10:36, 22 February 2007 edit121.7.56.203 (talk) ←Created page with 'Please DO NOT assume bad faith.See Help:Reverting Especially the Revert Wars Part. And see Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith Warnings are a privilage,do not abu...' | Revision as of 10:41, 22 February 2007 edit undoEvan C (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,152 edits ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Please go to the discussion Page and Talk there.STOP THE CYCLE OF REVERTING!] 10:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | Please go to the discussion Page and Talk there.STOP THE CYCLE OF REVERTING!] 10:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :(message to 208.113....) I'd say I have good reason to call the placement of irrelevant, non-NPoV, misquoted, and improperly cited content vandalism in itself. However, thus far I have assumed good faith, and haven't called it such. The text I removed doesn't belong on the ] article, not in its current form, at least. The reasons are specified on ]. Feel free to discuss it there - the general method in a dispute is to remove the text in question, discuss until a consensus is reached, and ''then'' to put the content back. | |||
| Finally, I don't particularly like being "warned" for "vandalism" that I've not committed. Please try to be constructive. --] (]) 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:41, 22 February 2007
Please DO NOT assume bad faith.See
Help:Reverting Especially the Revert Wars Part. And see Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith Warnings are a privilage,do not abuse your right.
Please go to the discussion Page and Talk there.STOP THE CYCLE OF REVERTING!121.7.56.203 10:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- (message to 208.113....) I'd say I have good reason to call the placement of irrelevant, non-NPoV, misquoted, and improperly cited content vandalism in itself. However, thus far I have assumed good faith, and haven't called it such. The text I removed doesn't belong on the Railpage Australia article, not in its current form, at least. The reasons are specified on Talk: Railpage Australia. Feel free to discuss it there - the general method in a dispute is to remove the text in question, discuss until a consensus is reached, and then to put the content back.
Finally, I don't particularly like being "warned" for "vandalism" that I've not committed. Please try to be constructive. --Evan C (Talk) 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)